How to serve multiple weblogic instances with a single apche server

Can any body let me know how to make use of an apache server to serve 2 weblogic
instances.
Thanks in advance
damodar

Yes, the documentation explains how to do this:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/adminguide/apache.html
Regards,
Eric
"Damodar" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3c23ccb9$[email protected]..
>
Can any body let me know how to make use of an apache server to serve 2weblogic
instances.
Thanks in advance
damodar

Similar Messages

How Can I Use Multiple Weblogic Instances in a Single OS

Hello Everyone,
Actually I have to install Some different applications. Few of them need weblogic 10.3.6 and others need 10.3.4. The OS am using is Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.
Now I am able to install 2 separate(One of 10.3.4 and 10.3.6) instances with two different users,In two different directories.
I have installed the weblogic 10.3.6 version with a user webadmin and installed node manager with port 5556. This is working fine.
The main problem here is :
In the second instance (10.3.4 ) installed with a a different user and gave the port number to NodeManager as 1600 and its not getting started. Its throwing error and also after some errors in the terminal am able to see that its reverting to port number 5556 only.
What might be the issue?
I have to install 2 different versions of weblogic in a single Server. But am failing with NodeManager. What Can I do to have multiple weblogic instances with multiple versions in a single server ?
Can anyone suggest a resolution for this please ?
Thanks in advance.

Pl do not spam these forums with multiple posts - How Can I Use Multiple Weblogic Instances in a Single OS

SSM - Configure Multiple Webserver's with a Single Database Server

Hi,
I need to install SSM using the following system landscape: Distributed system using a single database server and two webserver's.
The system is configured to use the Microsoft Network Load Balancing and that's the reason why exist two webserver's. When the user put the URL, the connection can be done to the webserver 1 or webserver 2 (the Microsoft Network Load Balancing will manage that).
I was checking the install guide "NW CE 7_1 SP5 SQL Server Install Guide.pdf" but there is no reference to this system landscape. The only "similar" is for High Availability System using Microsoft Cluster Service (MSCS), but that's not what I need.
I was planning to do a distributed installation and in the database server I will install:
- the Database Instance of NetWeaver
- the Database components of SSM (PAS)
In the Webserver I will install:
- the SCS Instance of NetWeaver
- the Primary Application Instance of NetWeaver
- the Web components of SSM (PIP, etc...)
For a scenario of a single webserver and a single database server, this work just fine.
My questions are:
- how can I configure SSM to work in a scenario of two webserver's and a single database server?
- Should I install the same components in both WebServer's?
- Should I use the same instance number or a different one?
- It is possible to have two netweaver instance sharing the same database?
Thanks in advance for all the help
Regards
Pedro

Hi Pedro,
- how can I configure SSM to work in a scenario of two webserver's and a single database server?
Yes see below. But also make sure SAP will support the configuration you're planning!
- Should I install the same components in both WebServer's?
yes.
- Should I use the same instance number or a different one?
The same makes configuration eaiser
- It is possible to have two netweaver instance sharing the same database?
Not for the SCS but yes for application server (your Java instances)
The central services, SCS instance, are one per a SAP System. So you cannot install one on each Web Server and operate them simultaneously.
Given your database is also a single point of failure then I would suggest you install the SCS with it on the database server.
On each of the Web Servers install an application instance of SAP NW CE.
Since the instance are on different servers they can share the same instance number. It is not mandatory but it may make configuration easier. e.g. for the the webservice the port will not change.
There can only be one Interactive Publisher (PIP) running so this may as well also go on your database server.
The Pilot Application Server (PAS) there can be multiple of so install one on each Web Server.
See section 5.2.3 of Server Installation Guide SAP Strategy Management Release 7.0 Support Package 2 and higher for configuring SAP NW CE to point to the one instance on Interactive publisher.
See section 5.2.7 of Server Installation Guide SAP Strategy Management Release 7.0 Support Package 2 and higher for setting up the Web Service target in Interactive publisher this will need to use the virtual ip(or hostname) of your Network Load Balancer.
Best of luck.
Marcel.

How To Install Multiple OBIEE Instances On One Linux Machine

Hi,
OS: Red Hat ES 5.2
OBIEE : 10.1.3.4
We one development server(Linux) where one OBIEE 10.1.3.4 was installed with os user as 'ora1a' (Deployed on Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.4)
and now I have installed OBIEE 10.1.3.4 on same Linux Server with different user(ora2b) and different mount point (Deployed on Another Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.4 )
But My OBIEE was not working and I came to know that only one can be working by default.
After following few notes i have update NQSConfig.inc and odbc.ini with different ports ie from 9704 to 9725 and bounced BI server and presentation server
But still its not working can any one tell me what are all needs to update to make it work
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Bhanu Chander
Reference's i used: HOW TO: Install Multiple OBIEE Instances On One UNIX Machine (Doc ID 605582.1)

Hi
I was not much clear about what you are telling
See my first OBIEE instance URL is http://hostname18.oracle.com:7777/analytics (As i deployed OBIEE on Application server 10g(OAS1))
and second one is http://hostname18.oracle.com:7778/analytics (As i deployed OBIEE on another Application server 10g(OAS2))
Also My port for first OBIEE instance is 9704 and second one is 9725(Which i changed to this)
Now tell me what are all i should update
Thanks,
Bhanu Chander

How to delete multiple data domains with single step ?

how to delete multiple data domains with single step ?

You can go to your Endeca-Server domain home e.g.($WEBLOGIC-HOME$/user_projects/domains/endeca_server_domain/EndecaServer/bin)
run
[HOST]$ ./endeca-cmd.sh list-dd
default is enabled.
GettingStarted is enabled.
endeca is enabled.
BikeStoreTest is enabled.
create a new file from the output just with the domains that you want to delete and then create a loop
[HOST]$ vi delete-dd.list
default
GettingStarted
endeca
BikeStoreTest
[HOST]$ for i in $(cat delete-dd.list); do; ./endeca-cmd.sh delete-dd $i; done
Remember that this can not be undone, unless you have a backup.

Create multiple portal instances with only one database?

Can someone create multiple portal instances with only one database?
If so, how is this done, just by running the portal configuration wizard?
How are most people running with multiple developers working on portal? Do they share a portal instance, or create their own?
Thank you very much!
Phillip

i'm currently using 9ias rel 2(9.0.2) and i have install one infrastructure and two mid tier, hoping that this will create two portal, but it didn't. Can you please tell me how to do create two portal within one server.
thanks and regards;
andrew

Java client connecting to multiple weblogic instances

We have a standalone java client JMS application that needs to connect to multiple
Weblogic instances running in different domains.
The client works fine when we obtain an initial context to the multiple instances
without specifying a security principle and password. As soon as we add in this
information, we get problems: The initial context is still successfully retrieved
for each of the weblogic instances, but we cannot send JMS messages to destinations
on one of the Weblogic instances due to a security exception which states that
there is an 'Invalid Principal'.
Any advice would be appreciated.

You should first establish a trust relationship between your Weblogic
servers:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/secmanage/domain.html#1171534
It is very poorly documented since this is a change in the behavior with
previous versions and should have been in the Release Notes but instead
is inside the normal documentation.
--dejan
jonathan wrote:
Thanks Arvind, but both JVMs are the same (1.3.1) and there is no jsse stuff in
the classpath.
"Arvind Gudipati" <[email protected]> wrote:
check if yr client's jvm version is the same as server's jvm.. ive noticed
this problem a few times when i was using client jvm (1.4.x) connecting
to
server jvm (1.3.x).. also check if u have any jsse libraries in yr
classpath.. if so remove 'em
+arvind
"Jonathan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3f2f9f19$[email protected]..
We have a standalone java client JMS application that needs to connect
to
multiple
Weblogic instances running in different domains.
The client works fine when we obtain an initial context to the multiple
instances
without specifying a security principle and password. As soon as we
add in
this
information, we get problems: The initial context is still successfully
retrieved
for each of the weblogic instances, but we cannot send JMS messages
to
destinations
on one of the Weblogic instances due to a security exception which
states
that
there is an 'Invalid Principal'.
Any advice would be appreciated.

Multiple weblogic instances using IIS to proxy the requests

I have a need to run multiple weblogic instances using IIS as the web
server.
Does anyone know if this is possible. I am aware and have been able to run
multiple weblogic servers as an nt service,
but in those cases weblogic was being called and IIS was being bypassed.
Now the user base wishes to use IIS to proxy the requests.
I have been able to set IIS to forward using the .jhtml and .jsp file
extensions to the iisproxy.dll, but have not been able to forward these
requests to multiple weblogic instances. When the request is made it is
only looking in the first instance of weblogic for the request.
Is it possible to use weblogic and IIS with two or more weblogic instances,
without weblogic acting as a webserver.
I dont believe this is possible but I need to find out if this really is the
case.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Ed

You need run each IIS web server instance in its own memory space. This can
be set through the Management Console for IIS.
Keith
Mike Kendzierski <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
We tried to do this & Weblogic doesn't support this config. We opened upa
support call with them regarding this, but there is a problem with the way
that IIS & NT proxies .JSP pages to the weblogic servers. It's very
unstable this way & I wouldn't recommend this config.
We switched to Apache with virtual hosts to do this & it works fine. It's
probably not the answer you want to hear, but it works very well.
If you have any questions, just ask away.
"Ed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a296c2d$[email protected]..
We are using IIS4 with weblogic 4.5.1 sp11,
I thought I read someplace, their was a problem between wls 4.5.1 sp7
and
wls 5.1 where it didnt look in the folder where the dll was.
I will give it a try on monday.
Peter Mergaerts wrote in message <[email protected]>...
We tried to do the same thing.
We copied iisproxy.dll and iisproxy.ini to server1 and let IIS use this.dll
instance for proxying .jsp etc.
We copied the iisproxy.dll and iisproxy.ini to server 2, renamed
iisproxy.dll to iisproxy2.dll (to make sure another instance was used)
and
let the second iis site use iisproxy2.dll, but that didn't worked. (It
doesn't read the iisproxy.ini file located in the same directory as the.dll
file, altough in the manual it says it checks this first.) Now, I thinkit's
possosible to use several iisproxy.dll's as long as you rename it so
each
get it's own instance, the only problem is that each .dll doesn't readthe
correct iisproxy.ini file. (BEA, is this for SP7?)
Regards,
Peter Mergaerts

SOA Server 11g (Weblogic instance) stopping on its own on Windows 2003 OS

Hi,
I am running SOA Server 11g (Weblogic instance) on Windows 2003 OS. The machine has 4 GB RAM and 1.8 GH CPU. The SOA Server (Java process) and Weblogic Admin Servers are stopping on its own. There are lo errors in the server log files. Please suggest if you have faces similar issues. I have installes Oracle Weblogic 11g and SOA Suite 11g on this machine. The same software runs fine on Windows XP OS.
Thanks
Subho

Can you please provide more information:
1. Which version of Windows Server 2003? 32 bit or 64 bit version?
2. Which exact version of Weblogic and SOA Suite have you installed?
3. How long do the servers run before they shutdown(do they even start properly before going down)?
4. Make the stdout go to the server log and then see if you can find any errors.
To do that you need to go to following under domain structure tree:
Environment>Servers>{your admin server name} page
in Logging tab, advanced section, Put a checkmark against following:
Redirect stdout logging enabled
Redirect stderr logging enabled
Save and activate and then restart the server. This will log the JVM log information to the weblogic server log and hopefully you will be able to identify the issue.

Managing multiple Postfix instances on a single host

We have quite a few sites on our Xserve. Each site should be able to relay email out the respective unique IP on a single host; however, by default email goes out the default website of the server or which IP is the current gateway.
NOTE: this is not a Postfix Virtual Domain Hosting > mail forwarding domains issue. Mail routes just fine to the correct email boxes. This is and issue where email going out to other mail servers originates from the box and not the respective domains and IP space.
The solution for this is Multiple PostFix Instances. One for each website (each website has a respective IP due to SSL and DNS is correct along with MX records).
For the outbound mail relay for our corporate network it seems there are no fields to enable a new postfix instance for each hosted or virtually hosted domain. Nor is there a way to enable SMTP to relay outgoing mail through another host unless you use a generic setting for every website on the server.
So for a enterprise level business how do we Managing multiple Postfix instances on a single host?

Fully on the same page with you. 110%
Here is why I am under the impression of why each domain name needs to be as if it needs its own MTA (mail transfer agent). No matter how big or small the business.
Just like a domain using SSL in Apache needs a dedicated IP when doing the packets . . .
Yahoo the big dog (for small to medium online businesses 70% of their customers make purchases with Yahoo emails; which most of them are temp emails or known as aliases.) states:
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/basics/postmaster-02.html
Many mail providers follow the same guidelines:
{quote}Segregate your lists to different IP addresses. If you maintain several lists (or clients, especially for an ASP), you may want to segregate your lists to ensure that users are marking each list on its own merits. If user sees both spam and legitimate mail from the same IP, their notifications to us will be hazy and will likely result in the spam overiding the legitimate mail.{quote}
So why not segregate websites to email out their own dedicated IPs?
Understandably sites that share IP space can go out the default MTA or better yet the MTA of that IP.
This way host providers can segment groups of clients and further prevent issues with out going email.
When email goes out a single MTA there are checks and rate limitations not just on the hops involved but from the "originating" IP address. So if site "A" has one IP and site "B" has another . . . well they both send email out the same default gateway. Take 100's of domains going out the same IP and customers (websites) start having issues getting customer communications delivered.
{quote}Maintain accurate reverse-DNS information for your mail servers. Yahoo! Mail makes extensive DNS checks for each connection, and an accurate reverse DNS will ensure prompt processing of your connection and email.{quote}
One mistake by one client out of 1,000 sites (or now Apple letting tens of thousands of sites able to be hosted) can get all 1,000 websites deferred and have what is called "reputation" issues.
In the past, as companies grow, sure they get more boxes or can cluster mail servers. With economic times beyond using Parallels . . . a single Mac Xserve can handle tens of thousands of websites doing a few thousand emails a day or more. It is more of a software/setting/configuration issue than just capability.
I remember Intel board meetings in the 90's where I (as a customer) stated put two nic cards on the mother board, standardize those rails, put twisted pair on those hard drive cables. Some things just take practical experience to see yes there is a real need and the business people are not getting it because they are focussing on the business or chasing their tail.
Also Note the IP address has to be STATIC:
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/errors/550-bl21.html;ylt=AsNxnjlX971dwy743e7j.olJHdG
{quote}In our continuing efforts to protect our users from unsolicited email, Yahoo! Mail does not accept SMTP connections from dynamic or residential IP addresses . . .{quote}
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/basics/postmaster-15.html
{quote}Segregate your mail streams by IP addresses, domains and/or DKIM selectors since Yahoo! Mail keeps reputation data about each IP address and domain you send from. For example, by segmenting the mail stream that delivers marketing mail from another that sends transactional messages, you make it easier for Yahoo! Mail to determine and assign each mail stream's reputation. {quote}
{quote} Use common-sense settings. While we have not published guidelines for numbers of connections you can concurrently use, we ask that you treat our resources with respect. The more you take, the fewer there are for others, which may force us to defer your connections. {quote}
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster//basics/postmaster-38.html
{quote}To facilitate the smooth flow of messages between legitimate senders and Yahoo! Mail, we offer the following recommendations:
Limit the messages you send per connection
Yahoo! Mail accepts a maximum of 5 messages per SMTP connection. We encourage you to cap the number of messages you send to Yahoo! Mail to fall within this per-connection limit.
When this limit is reached, no further messages will be accepted for delivery as our server automatically terminates the connection (without giving an error code). If you are sending messages to a significant number of Yahoo! Mail users, the suggestions below will help ensure uninterrupted delivery for your messages.
Reestablish connections if you do not get an error code
When our server terminates your connection after 5 messages have been accepted, you may try to reconnect to our MX servers immediately thereafter.
Open concurrent connections
You may open concurrent connections from the same server to facilitate efficient transmission of your messages. However, while we do not publish specific guidelines for the numbers of connections you can concurrently use, we ask that you treat our resources with respect. The more you take, the fewer there are for others, which may force us to deprioritize connections from your server(s).{quote}
In the Server Admin under General one can enable IMAP with a maximum number of connections. However, for normal SMTP there is no connections cap. Unless I am wrong here.
Domain throttling by domain is another way, but the real solution is just dedicated IPs for each website or each website to have a separate MTA. In the past this has meant a dedicated server or a physical gateway.
Technically there should be a Virtual solution. If I can virtually host many sites and many incoming emails on dedicated IP space respective to each domain. There should be virtual MTAs on dedicated or the same respective IP space as the incoming; hence, why I gave the example of how SSL works in Apache with web servers.
Totally get what you are saying on how currently mail works just out the default gateway since there is only one "default" MTA for the "xserve".
Everything is good coming in, but did something somewhere miss the mark on the outgoing? Should be one for one.
Yahoo is the big player putting the foot down or the glass half full people would say setting the mark on how outgoing mail should work when they are accepting emails.
I am not trying to innovate, but rather just follow the rules.
Sure mail out one MTA works no matter how many website you put on the box and it is "good enough for government work" or "looks good from my house".
There are many people struggling with corporate communications (even the concept of corporate communications and marketing) and I think Apple could step up to the plate and help follow the standard of best practices.
I have done research for 10 years and over the past two tested what I know to be true. Then spoke with many businesses that did not understand but had the same issue. . .
Yahoo customers not getting their email communications and email simply not being as good as the old fashion phone call.
So back to your question (fabulous question since every tech asks me the same thing):
{quote}So my question to you is this: why can't you run all your domains on a single server/IP address?{quote}
Because it is no longer 1996 and I want Apple stock to triple!
. . . and that it no longer works for sites conducting a profitable business. We are really underachieving what America could do!
Yahoo! is clearly saying to each business to do business communications or even marketing on separate IPs. Gmail, Hotmail, and the list goes on and on. They all follow the same thing. Yahoo! just happens to be more aggressive and has more good consumers (buyers) using their free email service. Gmail started aliases and could gain market share of buyers.
I need to get Xserve to have one dedicated IP in and out for each independent website whether it is an Apache transaction on port 80 (443 SSL) or an email going out the postfix MTA on port 25 SMTP or any other standard alternative port (587 or 465 SSL) for that matter.
So far everything works as expected, but the SMTP MTA out. One big default gateway per hardware.
We missed the 1% mark. That club that gets it! I would like to see every business owner that buys an Xserve to be in that one percent club out of the box!
Why Rob? Well because it works! Dedicated IPs work. Think about this, if you gave the postman your address and did not include your suite number more than likely your lucky if you get your mail. WORKS the same way for email.
If your business grows you can get a few more until something once again gets abused and they start tracking MAC addresses. By then will have virtual MAC addresses like most routers can already do.
To prevent SPAM you just set the MTA defaults to one IP per website. Let's keep it simple. This way you keep a clean reputation and one reputation per website or business. Most businesses just need one IP and cannot afford a whole server for each website/business. THINK GREEN!!! The email filtering systems (RBLs and filtering rules) already out there will weed abusers out. Let's not hurt the small to medium businesses in the process.
Your not going to get RDNS and dedicated IP space anyhow unless your a real business.

Multiple ASM instances on a single node

Can i have multiple ASM instances on a single node? This is to have each instance supporting different environment dev,stage etc
Thanks
Sannidhi

I had been discussing the same issue with someone from Oracle. I asked for multiple ASMs on a server so that we could have seperate ASMs running for, say, 10g and 11g.
He explained that we should think of ASM as being the same as Veritas FileSystem. We don't run multiple instances of Veritas on our servers. On single Veritas "instance" (set of drivers) provides all the Veritas Fx mountpoints on the server. Similarly, there should be only 1 ASM instance on a server.
(substitute UFS or ZFS or CFS for Veritas in the above example and you still have only 1 filesystem manager on a server providing one type of filesystem, although you could have, say , UFS and Veritas co-exist ; just as you could have Veritas, ASM and Raw co-exist on a server).
Hemant K Chitale
Edited by: Hemant K Chitale on Sep 29, 2009 11:50 AM

Can I have multiple TFS instances use a single SSRS installation

Can I have multiple TFS instances use a single SSRS installation?
Thanks

Hi Kim,
According to your description, you have multiple TFS instances using one Reporting Services instance. Right?
For installing TFS, to use a named instance with Team Foundation Server, you must install SQL Server by using a named instance, or move or restore Team Foundation Server data to a named instance, or create a team project collection on a named instance. Please
refer to the link below:
Work with SQL Server Named Instances
Reference:
Understanding SQL Server and SQL Server Reporting Services
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

Clear template cache on multiple CF instances in a single action?

I'm running several instances of Coldfusion on the same box
with template caching turned 'on' for each instance. I have it set
up where one instance will replicate file changes to the other
instances, but with caching turned on, I currently have to log in
to each CF Admin instance and click the "Clear Template Cache Now"
button for the file changes to appear. As I add more instances,
this will become an increasingly tedious process.
Does anyone have or know of a way to clear template cache
across multiple CF instances in a single action?

cfJarrod wrote:
> I'm assuming that using clearTrustedCache() will only
clear the cache for a
> single CF instance and not all instances on the server.
Is that in fact true?
Yes.
> Ideally I'd like to run a single script that will clear
the cache for all
> instances.
The Admin API is an application programming interface: you
are supposed
to write your own scripts that call its methods.
Jochem
Jochem van Dieten
Adobe Community Expert for ColdFusion

Multiple vendor payments with a single u201CYOURSELFu201D cheque

Hi,
How do we handle multiple vendor payments with a single u201CYOURSELFu201D cheque, drawn in favor of the paying banker? OR NEFT transfers in SAP.
Thanks,
M. Senthil

Hi
First things first:
1. You want to create a single payment document for multiple vendors. In such a case, you will not be able to use F110. You need to use F-53 or F-f8 in such a case. In the all the vendor masters, maintain the alternative payee with Description as "YOURSELF". There after, if you are using F-53, use FBZ5 to print the cheque in the name of alternative payee.
2. if you are using F110, multiple payment documents will be created for different vendors. In FBZP Config, you can assign the Payment Advise Form in the Payment Method Step in FBZP Config
Regards
Sanil

Convert a Mac Pro Server from January 2007 with OS 10.4 Server to Snow Leopard 6.0 (NON SERVER)

I have a Mac Pro Server from January 2007 with OS 10.4 Server installed. I want to convert from OS 10 Server OS to just using Snow Leopard 6.0 (NON SERVER). I have two hard drives installed. What is the best way to do this?
Can I just install Snow Leopard NON-SERVER on the second drive, then switch it into the place of the original main drive?
Can I switch the drives, then install the Snow Leopard on the replacement drive?

Not sure how you configured the server, though you can install snow leopard on second HDD and select boot drive with pressing "option" key during startup.

How to serve multiple weblogic instances with a single apche server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for