How to update Purchase Schedule agreement

Hi Experts,
Please tell me the ,is there any Function Module/BAPI which updates Purchase Schedule Agreement(Transaction Code ME38) in SAP???
Thanks..
Debi.

Hi,
Please check this BAPI BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Similar Messages

EDI settings for Purchase scheduling agreement

Hello,
We are having one new requirement,
Purchase scheduling agreement created for foriegn or local vendor, the Schedule lines are created or release by MRP run.
After MRP run the schedule lines are going to create , then vendor can get the message though IDOC,
How can we customise the ALE and Idoc settings for above said scenario.

Hi Mahesh
After schedule lines are created for SA we have provision of schedule line release transfer to Vendor , please check whether output determination is feasible with medium as Idoc
Please check
Kishor

BAPI for schedule lines (purchase scheduling agreement)

HI
Is there a BAPI available to create schedule lines in purchase scheduling agreements?
Is there any other way of creating schedule lines in purchase SAs via program?
Thanks in advance
Sriram

Dear Sriram,
Please check BAPI_SAG_CREATE with SE37.
Regards,
w1n

Price update in Scheduling Agreement

Dear Gurus,
I am seeking valuable suggestions reg the price update in scheduling agreement.
I am aware of the fact the the same can be done in the below mentioned ways-
1) Manually
2) Through condition records
I would be seeking the best possible option to the update the price in scheduling agreements, options would be
1) Manually @ item level
2) Changing condition records ( VK12) with same validity period
3) Changing condition records ( Vk12) with new validity period ( closing the old validity period)
This is because to avoid any inconsistency in the future.
Regards,
Ajit

Dear Ajit,
1.Manual entry -
Manual entry will be applicable in only some cases and you cant able to track if some one has changed the price and it is having limitation .
2.through condition records-
where as if you maintain the price through the access sequence and user cant able to change the price manually and for different combination and different material you can maintain different prices .here there is no limitation and you can extend this price for different combination in future .
Based on the above points you take decision.
Regards,
C.B Reddy

How to close the Scheduling Agreement

how to close the scheduling agreement
means i don't want to procure the material any more against the Scheduling agreement.

Abhishek
Please follow the below procedure.
You block items in Schedule agreements to prevent release orders or delivery schedules (in the latter case, including SA releases) being created against the agreement. For example, you may want to block an item if a vendor has delivered goods of poor quality.
Procedure
1.     Choose Schedule agreement Change.
2.     Specify the number of the outline agreement. Then press ENTER .
3.     Select the item(s) you wish to block. Then choose Edit Block.
The system inserts an S in the column D, indicating that the item is blocked.
To unblock the item, select it and then choose Edit Reset deletion indicator.
4.     Save the agreement.
or
You can delete the item in schedule agreement
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar

Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

Dear Experts,
We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
Solution
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Regards,
Udaya.

SAP BW Purchasing - Scheduling Agreement delta processing

Hi,
I have a question about Scheduling Agreements coming from ECC to BW with delta processing.
When a goods receipt happens for a Scheduling Agreement item, it registers process key 2.
However, it seems that when a second goods receipt happens for that same scheduling agreement item, the old goods receipts updates with a process key 4, and the new receipt takes the process key 2 when we aggregate at an InfoCube level. In the first level write optimized DSO, the process keys are in tact for every line item & schedule line (all goods receipts process key 2 are there).
Can somebody confirm this logic?
We are having issues because we need all of that goods receipt history stored in our InfoCubes, and we do not know how to resolve. Please help! Points will be assigned...
Thanks very much,
Courtney

are you saying that Process Key is 2 for both the good reciepts in write optimized DSO but in cube, first good reciept is having a process key 4 when second good reciept is also there?
If yes, it seems that problem is with the info object for process key - is it a Key Figure or characteristic?
It should be a characteristic so that the value is not added but overwritten.
you are doing a full or delta from Data Source to DSO and DSO to Cbue?
Regards,
Gaurav

Set Default Values on Purchasing Scheduling Agreements

Good day All.
I need to ensure that the Confirmation Control Key(EKPO-BSTAE) , Unlimited Over delivery indicator (EKPO-UEBTK), Creation Profile (EKPO-ABUEB) and Jit indicator (EKPO-FABKZ) is automatically updated with default values when a scheduling agreement is created for a specific purchasing organisation. Please advise if this is possible via config (SPRO).
Many thanks, Yumna
Edited by: Yumna Abrahams on Aug 10, 2011 2:58 PM

Hi,
To set default values for screen painter parameters initialize the field names with default values in the PBO module....
say u have the field name as f_field1....
in the PBO of that screen initialize it....
f_field1 = '100' "here 100 is the default value.
<b>reward points if useful.</b>
regards,
Vinod Samuel.

Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
Thanks

Hi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B

Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement

Hi Gurus,
Can you please advise on the below issue..
Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1) Create Delivery order (Order Type : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
Advance thanks for your valid points.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Hi Ram,
Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Auto update of Schedule Agreements

Once a schedule agreement has been created will MRP auto update the delivery date (for JIT) if the lead time is zero days and the new need date is today?

You need to check what is the procedure (T-Code) from which the data gets updated into these tables.
For example
when we craete a material from MM01 the data gets updated in the corresponding table i.e. EKPO.
In same way you need to find the process and then you can use BTE (Busineess transaction events) for that process. BTE are only for FI module and these tables are also related to FI .

How to update purchases in itunes

How to update app purchases made on 4S to new 5S?
Thanx, Boe

All purchases are listed in my account, but how to get them to showup in the 5S?

Binding on MRP field in Purchase Scheduling Agreement

Hi ,
We are trying to create a scheduling agreement using t-code ME31L, copying an existing scheduling agreement. This brings in most of the data from the referenced scheduling agreement. However, it does not bring in the "Binding on MRP" field in the scheduling agreement even though a value exists in the reference document.
Any help on how to bring this from the reference doucment is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Hari

Hello
You can use BAdI MD_PURREQ_CHANGE to define the desired valud for this field.
Check this document for more details about the BAdIs available on MRP.
BAdIs for MRP
BR
Caetano

How to update Purchase Request automatically when update qty in sales order

When we create a sales order, the PR will be automatically generated.
Now we have a requirement to change the order qty for the sales order. also the PR should be automatically changed.
With VA02, the process is perfect.
But by using BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE the SO is partly changed ( order qty is changed but the confirmed qty is not changed) and the PR is not changed.
So can you advise me how to update the PR by using the BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE, which indicator should be defined?
I've read the BAPI document but no such information.
Regards,

Hi Yang,
Workflow is the best approach for any issue related to business objects.
Since you want call FM BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE, it will change SO. It means everytime any SO is changed there will an event being triggered.
object type: BUS2032
event: Changed
simple solution:
1. Please create object type (SWO1) and its super type should be BUS2032.
2. Add your own method and attach your custom FM which actually updates the qty & PR)
3. Create Task (PFTC_INS)
in basic data:
- provide object type which you have created
- provide method which you have added
goto triggering events tab
- Choose Object Category as BOR object type
- provide object type (better give BUS2032)
- provide event as CHANGED
Please have look into very nice video blog which helps you to create your workflow.
blog: [Creating your first SAP Business Workflow]
Regards,
Sukhbold Altanbat.

Cumulative Qty Received by Customer wrongly updated in Scheduling Agreement

Hi All,
I face a strange issue in Schedule Agreement[Forecast Delivery Schedule].
The exact scenario is as follows:
1)On 17/09/09, I saw a CmlQtyReceived of '249'.
2)On 19/09/09, this value got changed to '141'
3)On 23/09/09, this value again got changed to '249'
I was not able to identify the reason for the '141' Qty getting displayed on 19th. Even if I go to Analysis now, there is no Forecast Delivery Schedule with '141' Qty to support the display.
Do let me know the issue in this.
Needless to say points will be awarded for helpful replies.
Regards,
Raj Kumar Reddy.

Hello;
I researched about this issue and I would like to recommend you to check the FAQ note about the most critical problems with Scheduling Agreements, note 923104.
As stated in question 2 (or also 3), you can check and correct the cumulative quantityes using Report SDLIPL01. Regarding this report, please refer to note 923105.
In addition, I kindly ask you to please check notes 922638 and 922639 about more details regarding the cumulative quantities.
Also, read the follow notes related to fiscal year changes:
      336670    Avoid the fiscal year change (introduction)
      332971    Avoid the fiscal year change (coding)
Well, I hope those documentation can help you a lot.
Regards
Ruy Castro

How to update Purchase Schedule agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for