How to use non-standard port for vnc?

Our Windows users who use RDC to connect to their desktops from off-site come in on a non-standard port number. Part of our security setup.
I'd like to do the same with Mac users who use screen sharing and vnc to connect remotely.
How can I specify another port number at both ends to accomplish this?
I can find nothing in the Network Utility app, or in the KB.
Surely there's a short sequence of Terminal commands that will do this?

I haven't tried this so don't know whether it will work. But I think it will. Presuming the target machine is a Mac, see if editing its /etc/services file will do it. Find the two lines that start with "vnc-server" and change the port number there. Launch Terminal.app as an administratively privileged user, sudo pico /etc/services, ^w to search for vnc-server, make the changes, ^x to exit, y to save and overwrite. Also, you will need to have screen sharing enabled in the target machine's System Preferences' Sharing, and the authorized users defined there, too. Reboot. Now, on the remote client, assuming it is also a Mac, the user would type ⌘k in the Finder (or mouse to Finder > Go > Connect to Server), and enter something like vnc://123.45.67.89:55900 where you substitute the actual IP address or host name for where I have entered 123.45.67.89, and where you substitute the actual alternate port number where I have entered 55900. Of course, in the clients' Screen Sharing's Preferences, they should choose to encrypt the entire session, not just the login. Like I said, I haven't tried this because I just tunnel my vnc stuff through ssh, but I'm thinking that this should work.

Similar Messages

  • How to use a fixed port for remote assistance in windows 8.1 behind a nat router freebox?

    Hello,
    Before to use remote assistance in windows 8.1, i need to configure my nat router freebox.
    But remote assistance ( msra.exe ) use a dynamique port and never the same.
    How to use a fixed port for remote assistance ini windows 8.1 ?
    And why i can't use easy connect ?
    i read that the router must implement the PNRP protocol. I think it's a propriatary microsoft's protocol unknow on my router.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    Very good. It's a big range ( 255 mini from 49152 )  for a single port but if it's the only one possibility...
    You are very helpfull ( i don't know if it's a good english but you make me very happy )
    Merci beaucoup

  • Isakmp peers using non-standard port 4500

    Hello,
    I have a remote site using the Internet to access corporate networks over IPSEC. Set-up is as below:
    Remote Router uses public IP across internet --> hits corporate untrusted nework FW --> NAT'ed to private 10.x.x.x IP --> reaches trusted network router.
    The problem is that the peer keeps hanging and the only way to reset it is to issue 'clear crypto session' on the central trusted router. I have added isakmp keepalives with the aim of forcing some keepalive traffic:
    crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic
    ...and this works to some degree (with DPD are u there keepalives). However I have noticed that the far end router uses non-standard ports when trying to set up phase-1 tunnel:
    BEVRLY_D_CR184_01#sh crypto isa pee
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 4500 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10456 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10554 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10557 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10580 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10589 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10596 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: 161.x.x.x Port: 10600 Local: 77.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    These ports (non-4500) will be blocked by our firewalls. Why does it use these, and is there a way of stopping the router using anything other than port 4500?
    Thanks
    Phil

    Hello,
    Yes - there's NAT at the trusted central router end our side of the firewall... the config used is below:
    Remote Router end:
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    encr 3des
    hash md5
    authentication pre-share
    group 2
    lifetime 180
    crypto isakmp key address
    crypto isakmp invalid-spi-recovery
    crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic
    crypto ipsec security-association idle-time 300
    crypto ipsec transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec profile VTI
    set security-association lifetime seconds 1800
    set transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform
    interface Tunnel1
    description BEVRLY_CC296_01 F0/8 (10.30.45.29)
    ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
    ip helper-address 10.91.6.30
    ip helper-address 10.4.162.92
    ip mtu 1400
    ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5
    load-interval 30
    tunnel source Dialer1
    tunnel destination
    tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
    tunnel protection ipsec profile VTI
    Central Router:
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    encr 3des
    hash md5
    authentication pre-share
    group 2
    lifetime 180
    crypto isakmp key address
    crypto isakmp invalid-spi-recovery
    crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic
    crypto ipsec security-association idle-time 300
    crypto ipsec transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec profile VTI
    set security-association lifetime seconds 1800
    set transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform
    interface Tunnel1
    description link to Beverley via internet (BEVERLY_CR184_01 Tun1)
    ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
    ip mtu 1400
    ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5
    load-interval 30
    tunnel source FastEthernet0/1
    tunnel destination
    tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
    tunnel protection ipsec profile VTI
    I believe the DPD keepalives ensure NAT is known and compatible (crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic) between the peers....
    Any help gladly appreciated....
    thanks
    Phil

  • CFHTTP GET using non-standard ports

    I have an application which goes out and checks links on
    various servers to verify that the link still exists, however I
    have a few links on servers that use non-standard ports (ie 8001,
    7072, 8080, etc). When I dump CFHTTP I get the following:
    struct
    Charset [empty string]
    ErrorDetail I/O Exception: Premature EOF encountered
    Filecontent Connection Failure
    Header [undefined struct element]
    Mimetype Unable to determine MIME type of file.
    Responseheader struct [empty]
    Statuscode Connection Failure. Status code unavailable.
    Text YES
    Any ideas?
    Thanks.
    Mike

    Yup, FaceTime was set up on all devices using my home network. It functions correctly pretty much everywhere except on my internal network at the office.
    I'm pretty sure this is a firewall issue, not a basic FaceTime problem.

  • CSS 11501 ftp server setup problem using non-standard port

    Dear Expert,
    we would like to setup FTP server over CSS where our member sever use non-std-port to open both control/data channel (i.e. 6370 as ctrl and 6369 as data this case.) but seems we only get Passive mode FTP mode work only but not for Active mode FTP case for data channel establishement for server back to client...is there any professional advise can help on this case...? here is our setup info FYI
    #  sh ver
    Version:               sg0820501 (08.20.5.01)
    Flash (Locked):        08.10.1.06
    Flash (Operational):   08.20.5.01
    Type:                  PRIMARY
    Licensed Cmd Set(s):   Standard Feature Set
                           Secure Management
    CVDM Version:          cvdm-css-1.0_K9
    !*************** Global
    ftp data-channel-timeout 10
      ftp non-standard-ports
    !************************** SERVICE **************************
    service ftp_ftpgtw
      keepalive maxfailure 2
      keepalive frequency 15
      keepalive retryperiod 2
      keepalive type tcp
      ip address 192.168.52.170
      protocol tcp
      keepalive port 6370
      port 6370
      active
    # sh run group drfusegtwftp_grp 
    !*************************** GROUP ***************************
    group gtwftp_grp
      vip address 192.168.52.28
      add service ftp_ftpgtw
      active
      content ftp_gtwpkg-ftpgtw
        add service ftp_ftpgtw
        vip address 192.168.52.28
        port 21
        protocol tcp
        application ftp-control
        active

    Thanks for your confirmation on no prob found in config level 1st..:P..as to save us a lot of time in isolating problem at this level.
    What we can notice is seems the data port connection is fail to open  for server back to client....for our general sense..... the flow expected should be:
    TCP session A -- Client:1234 --> VIP:21 --> member svr:6370
    TCP session B -- Client: 5678 <--> VIP:20 <--> member Svr: 6379 [on demand generated between server/client]
    but we can only see session B fail  to setup when client side access VIP site on CSS..even we try to put the most standard case as below
    TCP session A -- Client:1234 --> VIP:21 --> member svr:21
    TCP session B -- Client: 5678 <--> VIP:20 <--> member Svr: 20
    we still unable to make the Active mode FTP access work either...hence we got no idea on how CSS handle FTP access when it involve services over multiple tcp ports..
    and from CSS xlate view...the problem is we can only see what NAT IP that used in CSS connect to client...but no way to confirm for which port for VIP using outgoing to client. neither it is dropped by CSS..nor it is never setup from VIP to Client side.

  • How to use non default port 1521 while 11.2.0.1 grid upgrade to 11.2.0.2

    Hi Team ,
    We are planning 11.2.0.1 Grid infra rolling upgrade to 11.2.0.2 with out any downtime.
    But while up gradation due to default scan port 1521 , 11.2.0.1 databases are not able to connect (remote connections)
    We are using 1900 port for existing 11.2.0.1 grid infra scan.
    While up gradation it is taking default port of 1521 insted of existing port 1900.
    Please provide the solution to use non default port while 11.2.0.2 up gradation.
    After upgrade the status as below.
    grdoratst104:/apps/grid/grdhome:+ASM4> srvctl config scan_listener
    SCAN Listener LISTENER_SCAN1 exists. Port: TCP:1521
    SCAN Listener LISTENER_SCAN2 exists. Port: TCP:1521
    SCAN Listener LISTENER_SCAN3 exists. Port: TCP:1521
    Here I was getting TNS:no Listener errors from the client connections.
    I have modifyed the scan port then it is working fine.
    grdoratst104:/apps/grid/grdhome:+ASM4> srvctl modify scan_listener -p TCP:1800
    grdoratst104:/apps/grid/grdhome:+ASM4> srvctl config scan_listener
    SCAN Listener LISTENER_SCAN1 exists. Port: TCP:1800
    SCAN Listener LISTENER_SCAN2 exists. Port: TCP:1800
    SCAN Listener LISTENER_SCAN3 exists. Port: TCP:1800
    grdoratst104:/apps/grid/grdhome:+ASM4>
    Here the problem is we need to do the grid infra upgrade with out downtime,but due this default port issue clients are not able to connect to the database.
    Thanks
    Bala
    Edited by: user12032334 on May 31, 2011 11:46 AM

    Why are you using a non default port? It does not improve security. It makes network management more complex. And causes the type of issues that you are facing now.
    So before changing defaults, make sure that your reasons are technically sound. And using port 1900 when 1521 is available, is not technically sound by any means.
    As for addressing the problem you have created for yourself by mucking around with port numbers. Use a NAT firewall (on each RAC node) to rewrite packets headers received on port 1900 and send these to the server's port 1521 instead (on the VIP or static IP as required).
    This can be fairly easily done using iptables if your o/s is Linux. You need to:
    a) create a pre-routing NAT rule
    b) create a post-routing NAT rule
    c) create a forwarding filter rule for port 1900/tcp
    d) create an input filter rule to accept traffic on 1900/tcp

  • FaceTime using non-standard ports?

    FaceTime will not work on my internal network. I can place a call from one iOS device to another, and the receiving device can connect...but the caller doesn't complete the connection.
    I've opened the ports on my firewall listed in Apple's KnowledgeBase article (http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4245):
    443 (TCP) - already open for HTTPS traffic
    3478 through 3497 (UDP)
    5223 (TCP) - already open for Apple Push Notification Service traffic
    16384 through 16387 (UDP)
    16393 through 16402 (UDP)
    In my WatchGuard Firebox firewall's logs, however, when I place a FaceTime call I'm seeing 3 packets blocked with destination ports in the 50000-60000 range - well outside the ranges Apple lists, for example:
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     49350/udp -> 59491
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     49351/udp -> 59491
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     21487/udp -> 59491
    or
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     25000/udp -> 60232
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     51137/udp -> 60232
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     51138/udp -> 60232
    or
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     27814/udp -> 59060
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     10839/udp -> 59060
    Deny     10.50.1.155     [outside]     10840/udp -> 59060
    As mentioned, I place the call, the receiver rings, the receiver answers and says "connecting...", but the caller keeps ringing.
    Any ideas?

    Yup, FaceTime was set up on all devices using my home network. It functions correctly pretty much everywhere except on my internal network at the office.
    I'm pretty sure this is a firewall issue, not a basic FaceTime problem.

  • IPSEC crypto peers using non-standard ports

    Hello,
    I have a remote site that is using port 4500 for within the isakmp phase of creating a IPSEC tunnel, but for some reason it is also using random port numbers constantly (in bold):
    BEVRLY_D_CR184_01#sh crypto isa peer
    Peer: x.x.x.x Port: 4500 Local: x.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: x.x.x.x Port: 10456 Local: x.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: x.x.x.x Port: 10554 Local: x.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: x.x.x.x Port: 10557 Local: x.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    Peer: x.x.x.x Port: 10580 Local: x.x.x.x
    Phase1 id: 10.2.0.92
    These are all blocked by the firewall when trying to communicate with our central router in the trusted network. The central router does not display the same symptoms, it only uses port 4500.
    Is there a way of preventing the remote router from using random port numbers and only allowed to use 4500??
    Thanks
    Phil

    Hello,
    Yes - there's NAT at the trusted central router end our side of the firewall... the config used is below:
    Remote Router end:
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    encr 3des
    hash md5
    authentication pre-share
    group 2
    lifetime 180
    crypto isakmp key address
    crypto isakmp invalid-spi-recovery
    crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic
    crypto ipsec security-association idle-time 300
    crypto ipsec transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec profile VTI
    set security-association lifetime seconds 1800
    set transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform
    interface Tunnel1
    description BEVRLY_CC296_01 F0/8 (10.30.45.29)
    ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
    ip helper-address 10.91.6.30
    ip helper-address 10.4.162.92
    ip mtu 1400
    ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5
    load-interval 30
    tunnel source Dialer1
    tunnel destination
    tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
    tunnel protection ipsec profile VTI
    Central Router:
    crypto isakmp policy 10
    encr 3des
    hash md5
    authentication pre-share
    group 2
    lifetime 180
    crypto isakmp key address
    crypto isakmp invalid-spi-recovery
    crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic
    crypto ipsec security-association idle-time 300
    crypto ipsec transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec profile VTI
    set security-association lifetime seconds 1800
    set transform-set BEVERLEY_Transform
    interface Tunnel1
    description link to Beverley via internet (BEVERLY_CR184_01 Tun1)
    ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
    ip mtu 1400
    ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5
    load-interval 30
    tunnel source FastEthernet0/1
    tunnel destination
    tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
    tunnel protection ipsec profile VTI
    I believe the DPD keepalives ensure NAT is known and compatible (crypto isakmp keepalive 90 30 periodic) between the peers....
    Any help gladly appreciated....
    thanks
    Phil

  • How to use front microphone port for Vo

    Hey guys, I'm using a trusty old audigy platinum, and I recently grabbed a headset to hop into gaming chat and VoIP with friends. The microphone works fine, because I can hear myself speaking through the headset. However, when I try to use it, no VoIP software recognizes it. I believe that the problem is that it's plugged into Microphone/Line-In 2 on my front panel. It's not a software-specific problem, because both GTalk and Skype have it. I do know there's some way to do a software work around, because some of my sound editting software allows me to take the input from the front(such as a guitar) and record and play fine.
    What I need, is some way to pass off Microphone/Line-in 2 as Mic port , or some specific work around to make both Skype and GTalk work with the front ports. Putting it in the back is really not an option.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    To use it with skype, go to options and under audio devices there should be an option called "Let Skype adjust my sound device settings." Untick this box and manually set the recording source to be "Mic2/Line-In 2."
    The it should work with Skype without a problem

  • How can ftp service on non-standard port be load balanced using Cisco ACE.

    How can ftp service on non-standard port be load balanced using Cisco ACE.For example ftp service required on tcp 2000 port

    Hi Samarjit,
    you can do this by specifying the port number in the class map that you create . Please find the below mentioend config guide where you can specify the tcp/udp port , range or ports or even the wild card to match the port.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/administration/guide/mapolcy.html#wp1318826
    Regards
    Abijith

  • Using non-standard sshd port after 10.8 upgrade

    After spending hours tracking down this solution as a result of losing my ssh settings after the upgrade to Mountain Lion, I thought it might be useful to post the steps taken to restore the configuration I used with Snow Leopard.
    Changing the sshd default listening port
    Disclaimer: This tutorial is specific to Mountain Lion (OS X 10.8). I was able to accomplish this using Snow Leopard (OS X 10.6) in fewer steps, but upgrading required this more involved solution. 
    Steps:
    1.) You must first enable the root user account in order to change the relevant files. This can be done from the terminal, or by going to System Preferences --> Users & Groups. Once there, click on 'Login Options' at the bottom of the Current User list, and 'Join' where it says 'Network Account Server'.
    This will bring up a smaller window. Click on 'Open Directory Utility' at the bottom. You will be prompted for your admin password. Now go to the 'Edit' tab at the top of the screen and toggle down to 'Enable Root User'.  You will be prompted to enter your admin password twice.
    2.) Log out of your regular user account. At the log in screen you will now see an additional entry for 'other'. Click on that and log in with the username 'root' and your admin password. If are inexperienced as a root-level user, be careful as you can cause problems to your system can be difficult to undo.
    Once in your root account, the first step is to create a new 'service definition' in the etc/services file. Open the file with text editor of choice and scroll to the current entry for sshd listening port, which will look like this:
    ssh    22/udp    # SSH Remote Login Protocol
    ssh    22/tcp     # SSH Remote Login Protocol
    Overwrite the '22' with the port number you would like sshd to listen on:
    ssh    12345/udp   # SSH Remote Login Protocol
    ssh    12345/tcp    # SSH Remote Login Protocol
    *12345 being our hypothetical, non-standard port.
    It is important to note that the new port number will not take by simply adding a new uncommented line to the file (I tried), unless of course you comment the original ssh entries. Easiest way is just to overwrite what is there already. Save changes.
    3.) You now need to edit the ssh.plist file, which is located at /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/ssh.plist. A word to those familiar with Linux/BSD environments: changing the default port in the sshd_config file, which exists in OS X, does NOT change the listening port. Simply changing the default port, saving the config file, and restarting the server (the sensible way) won't work. The OS X sshd server (openssh) is configured to get launch instructions from the ssh.plist file, as opposed to sshd_config. If you are more interested in this aspect of OS X, read up on LaunchDaemons (e.g. launchd).
    Before altering the ssh.plist file, you should save a backup copy in case of mistakes, or if you need to revert back to it in the future. Name your backup file something like original.ssh.plist, etc.
    In the ssh.plist file, locate the SocksServiceName entry and change it from the default:
    <key>SockServiceName</key>
    <string>ssh</string>
    To the following:
    <key>SockServiceName</key>
    <string>$alternate port number</string>
    In our example from above this value would be 12345.
    4.) Save your changes, and exit ssh.plist. You now need to move the backup file you created (original.ssh.plist) out of the System/Library/LaunchDaemons path.
    The updated sshd port will not take until you have only one ssh.plist file in the LaunchDaemons directory - this has to do with how launchd is configured to load files which is outside the scope of the current discussion.  (*If you've found a way around this, please share.) 
    5.) Restart the sshd server. Easiest way to accomplish this is going to System Preferences --> Sharing and clicking off 'Remote Login', then clicking back on it. 
    6.) Test the configuration by logging into the machine running the sshd server from another host using:
    ssh username@ipaddress -p 12345
    There are a few good tutorials out there that capture some of these steps, but many are dated and/or incomplete. If you are running a standard setup of OS X 10.8, this should work for you.
    Of course, don't be fooled into thinking that changing the default listening port from the ubiquitously-probed 22 equates to actual security. At best, it will cut down on the number of dubious connection attempts and probing.

    Hi all, above helped me change the sshd port number, thank you very much.
    Just upgraded to OS X 10.9.3 on my macbook pro.
    My findings were:
    Step 1(become a root user or sudo)
    Step 2 (/etc/services)
    This may not be required unless you want ssh to work without the "-p XXXX" option to connect to other ssh hosts.  I favor such as "ssh -p 2222 user@hostname" just to be sure I know what I am doing and also to leave ssh known port as its default "22".
    Step 3 (/System/Library/LaunchDaemons/ssh.plist)
    This is required if you want to change the sshd port number, I changed both "ssh" to "2222" in this file.
    Step 4 (launchctl)
    Below is a must as I understood:
    launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/ssh.plist
    launchctl load /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/ssh.plist
    it should be already working with the new port number.
    You can "ssh -p 2222 user@localhost" in the console terminal and see if its working.
    Since I am no expert on MacOS X, and it is a macbook pro that I am using, I also rebooted the system and changes were reflected permanantly.
    Thank you guys!

  • Mailserver using non-standard smtp port

    how do i set SMTP to accept connections on a non-standard port (i.e. 2525 or something)?
    i'm running a mail server and my residential isp (comcast) after ten years of peaceful coexistence decided that they need to block port 25. so i am setting up a commercial store/forward mail relay service. all i need to do is set up my snow leopard server to accept incoming connections on a port other than 25. sounds easy. it is mentioned in the docs thusly:
    "By default SMTP is enabled on port 25. If port 25 is blocked in your environment,
    you need to change the port SMTP uses."
    ... but that's all i can find. specifically, it doesn't say exactly how to change the port.
    any help appreciated.

    following up to my own post. hoping this info may be useful for others who face the same issue who are running a server and then having email ports blocked by their ISP's.
    i worked around this by signing up for a mail relay service (i use the one provided by dnydns.com). they forward incoming mail for my domain over a nonstandard port.
    since i never received an answer to my question about how to make SnowLeopardServer email server accept SMTP connections on other ports, i simply used port mapping in my router (Airport Extreme) to redirect this port (i used 2525) on my WAN address to port 25 on my server - an acceptable workaround.
    i also did the same port redirection for the other "standard alternative" smtp ports, 465 and 587.
    since my ISP blocks port 25 in both directions, i also needed to find a work-around for outgoing mail as well. previously, my mail server simply forwarded to my ISP's smtp server (using the default port 25). here the Server Admin interface worked but with one "trick": under Mail>Settings>General, i left the box for "Relay outgoing mail through host:" checked, and in the field there i put "[smtp.myispdomain.net]:587" (that is with square brackets, and a colon, but no double-quotes - and of course, use your own smtp server's domain name). afaik this is not documented anywhere in the apple-provided docs, but i found the corresponding docs for postfix, and reverse-engineered it.
    so now i can read (via IMAP) and send (via SMTP) mail from my home server, both when i am on my LAN and when i am accessing remotely, and effectively work around the bi-directional block of port 25 imposed by my ISP.
    i'd still like to know if there is a method of configuring smtp to accept connections on ports other than 25. i can see how to do it by editing /etc/postfix/master.cf, but afaik that file gets overwritten by Server Admin...

  • Using the CSM to setup a HTTPS session on non-standard ports?

    Hi Guys,
    One of our clients wants to setup an SSL connection on a non-standard SSL port i.e. 4444 to begin with. Here the sever handles the SSL encryption / deccryption) instead of the SSL module.
    I've found the following config to work well:
    serverfarm FARM-MOBS-4444
    nat server
    no nat client
    predictor leastconns
    failaction purge
    real 130.194.12.81 4444
    inservice
    real 130.194.12.84 4444
    inservice
    probe MOBS-4444
    sticky 108 netmask 255.255.255.255 timeout 60
    vserver VMOBS-PROD-4444
    virtual 130.194.11.51 tcp https
    serverfarm FARM-MOBS-4444
    sticky 60 group 108
    persistent rebalance
    inservice
    With the above setup the CSM redirects the SSL connections (recieved on 443) to port 4444 on the sever and maintains this for the duration of the session.
    While the above setup works, is it possible to configure the VIP to use a HTTPS port other than 443 (which is default)? This would then allow for separate HTTPS paths to be setup on non-standard ports. I ask this since the client also wants to setup a HTTPS path on port 4443 as well.
    Any ideas would be useful.
    thanks
    Sheldon

    Hi Martin,
    Do you mean using the SSL module to perform the encryption / decryption? If so i've tried this and it does work without an issue.
    I was just wondering if it were possible to have a VIP setup where the HTTPS port is not 443 but say 4443, where the encryption / decryption is done by the real servers themselves.
    thanks
    Sheldon

  • Cannot setup work email using SSL on non standard port

    All,
      I've been trying now for a few hours to setup a corporate email account.  I've tried via the curve and via the bb internet service but in both cases since the service cannot detect the settings since a non standard port is in use I cannot use the the service and am considering returning the device to go with another easier to use device.  I love the hardware design but if I cannot setup my corporate email this is no good to me.  I'd appreciate any tips anyone has.
    Thanks,
      Frustrated.

    Your corprorate email account is an exchange server or what?
    You are on a personal BIS plan?
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • How To Configure non-standard SMTP port

    My ISP has blocked port 25. I have a service that will deliver mail to the port of my choosing. How do I configure Leopard Server to listen on a non-standard SMTP port? 2525 for example.
    Also, I assume all I have to do on my Airport Express is set up NAT to rake external port 2525 and point it to the private address of my email server on port 2525. Is this correct?
    Thanks,
    -ernie

    Assuming such is offered, look to acquire a business-class ISP service level, and move on to the next issue? The business-class services typically provide static IP address(es), opens up server ports, and sets up DNS and ISP-side server connections for your hosts. And you can call your ISP or other assistance when your network craters; non-standard connections are (as you've found) harder to support.
    One subtlety here: in a number of cases, simply having a business-class service means you're supported by a different group within (larger) ISPs. This can be a significant advantage at times, given that the scripts and tools and such that are available for the business group will be rather more targeted than the scripts that are available for the residential services group at the ISP.
    There are a number of folks that have sought and have tried this (try a few Google searches for SMTP and non-standard port), and it mostly works. But it is fragile, and tends to be derailed when something goes weird, or when the ISP spots and shapes or blocks the server traffic.
    Also check your ISP's terms of service here, lest your network pipe be subject to summary disconnection.
    The other option is to VPN or tunnel into to a co-lo or dedicated server or a virtual hosting service; to run your servers or virtual servers somewhere without firewalls blocking the standard ports.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Need suggestion on Color Profile settings for printing image

    I am trying to print the image below on a Xerox Docucolor 242.  Im trying to get a better understanding of profiles and all that, which I THINK I do now. Under Color Settings in Indesign, I have under Working Spaces, RGB is set to my monitor brand an

  • EJB - JAR or EAR file reloading - how to get it to work consistently.

    We are using wl 6.0 sp2 rp2 - with 2 WL instances on the same box. We have always seemed to have had this headache with WL - getting EJB's to reload consistently. Does anyone have a sequence of steps they follow to get good consistent reloading resul

  • Purchasing inforecord price history

    Hi How to control the PO price history whether as effective price or net price cheers

  • Notes missing

    Hello, 70% of my notes are missing. I've just unlocked my phone, and they're gone. I've done nothing new in any of my Apple devices (ipad, iphone or macbook). Do you know if it is possible to restore the old notes? I had them backed up to iCloud, but

  • Retina MacBook Pro fan very loud and usb mouse disconnecting when restarting the computer

    2 days ago, I got a brand new retina MacBook Pro 13 inch with the specs 2.8 GhZ i7, 8 gigs of ram and 512gb ssd. It should definitely be functioning properly since it's a really expensive computer, but I already noticed a few problems that I hope you