How well does OSX Yosemite run on a Mid 2007 iMac?

I own a Mid 2007 iMac with 4GB 667Mhz DDR2 RAM, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz processor and has ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT 128 MB graphics. I was considering upgrading from OSX Mavericks 10.9.4 to OSX Yosemite, but fear it may slow the Mac down. If anybody has upgraded their Mid 2007 iMac, does it slow the system down? Thank You.

Hi JRos23. Thanks for sharing your experience.
I also have a mid 2007 iMac (2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo) and I'm waiting on reviews like yours to evaluate if it is worth to take the leap and update. Last year I updated to Mavericks from Lion (skipped Mountain Lion) and it improved a lot on many fronts. However, it only felt smooth when I updated the RAM to 6GB. Apple specs tells us that this machine supports max 4Gb, though I found many people saying that it would support 1x2GB + 1x4Gb, and it does. I trully recommend it. If it helps anyone, I bought these: link (sorry, Spanish Amazon store).
However, seeing that you're having a good enough experience until now I will definitely consider it as near future project, maybe with 10.10.1. Is it really an improvement or are there any daily usage setbacks?
Cheers,
JP

Similar Messages

How well does Vista Ultimate run? Worth getting?

Hey everyone, I have XP installed right now on my macbook pro to play Lord of the Rings Online and Counter-Strike Source. My college is offering Vista SP1 Ultimate for VERY cheap! Is it worth upgrading to Vista on a macbook pro? Also is it worth getting the 64 over the 32? I'm mostly just looking at being able to run Lord Of The Rings Online and Counter Strike and maybe some other games. So would it be wise to get Vista SP1 64-bit?
Also how well would it run in VMWare? I use VMWare sometimes when I just need to change some stuff in my XP Boot Camp partition, does it still run well?

which macbook pro do you have? What are the specs?

How Well does FCP Studio Run on a MBP?

I've been debating whether to wait on a MP update or pickup a new 17" MBP. How well do all the Studios programs run on the new 17" MBP?
Thanks

How well do all the Studios programs run on the new 17" MBP?
Exceptionally well. You can also get an Express Card adapter and run super fast eSATA external drives too.

How well does macbook air run photoshop?

I'm considering the 11" MB air and an the 27" monitor because I do a lot of traveling and writing that would be better with a light laptop. But I also do a fair amount of photo editing in Photoshop and am wondering what experience people have with running Photoshop and other graphics-intensive tasks on these machines. I run CS4 currently on an iMac. What is your experience? Thanks in advance!

I use CS4 Photoshop on both a 2010 11" and a 2011 13" (both 4 gb), and can confirm that it runs just fine, without issue, and no perceptible handicap as compared with a MBP (which I also have used it on).

How well does Adobe CS4 run on an Apple ibook G4?

I
I am using an Apple ibook 1.33GHz with Leopard 10.5.8
If anyone is using CS4 on a G4 any input would be extremely helpful

Hi, and welcome to Apple Support Communities.
According to Adobe, it won't run on any Mac with a G4 processor.
Macintosh system requirements
Design Premium and Standard
Web Preimium and Standard
Production Premium
Master Collection
Point Products
Design Premium and Standard
PowerPC G5 or multicore Intel processor

How well does Photoshop Cs6 run on the 15" Macbook Pro with 2.6gHz?

I'm currently 'in the market' for a new computer. My desktop is fine, but no longer can handle all the tasks I can toss at it for work (i.e. graphic design). I have been carefully biding my time, getting as much use out of it and my essentially crummy Paint Shop Photo x2, and I believe now for it to be the time to invest in a Mac and the newest edition of Photoshop (CS6). My question is this: Which one of the two Macbook Pro 15" will work best with it, and yet still survive through the next few series of upgrades? My boyfriend says the higher one, the 2.6gHz guy, will do just fine for what I need, I'm just chewing my nails off at the price. And no, I'm not interested in the retina display model. Suggesting it is just pointless.
Basically, I'd like to know which Macbook Pro 15", the one with 2.3gHz or 2.6gHz, will suffice for the jobs I need to do, which include all areas of graphic design and artwork (hence Photoshop), along with heavy internet usage (7-9+ tabs open at any time), Word documents or the equivalent (Pages) and any extras (iTunes, Spotify). Bonus if it can gently tolerate things such as the Sims 3 and all its expansion packs.

The nice thing about the 2.6GHz model is that it comes with a NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory. The 2.3GHz model only has the NVIDEO GeForuce GT 650M with 512MB of GDDR5 memory. And Photoshop will take advantage of that extra video RAM.
That said, I have an older (late 2011) 15" MBP with a 512MB video card and Photoshop CS6 (and the entire Adobe Design & Web Premium suite) works just fine. If I were you, I would buy the base 2.3GHz model with 4GB of RAM and upgrade the RAM, and possible the hard drive with a SSD, as you need it. You can upgrade your RAM yourself to 16GB and you will notice an appreciable difference in Photoshop speed. And I would recommend the RAM upgrade straightaway. You can then look at putting in a 512GB SSD for around $400 and you'll have one of the fastest machines around.
So go with the 2.3GHz and upgrade the RAM immediately. Good sources for RAM are Crucial, Corsair, etc. You'll get far more out of a RAM upgrade than you will the processor upgrade.
Clinton

How well does Aperture (i.e., brushes) perform on the iMac 3.06GHz?

I currently have a MBP 2.4GHz. I have the latest version of Aperture and my camera is a Canon 5D Mark II. I have noticed that when using Aperture's brushes that it really taxes my MBP. It will take a while to process and sometimes I get the spinning rainbow ball forever.
I know the 3.2 iMac works quite well as I toyed with it at the Apple Store. Unfortunately, the Apple Store didn't have any 3.06 iMacs on display.

The difference between the 3.06 and 3.2 will be more than eclipsed by maxxing out the memory and getting a fast beefy hard drive.

Was wondering how well does the 1Ghz titanium runs Leopard?

Hi
Could some one put up a youtube video of how well leopard runs on the last titanium g4?
I mean the minimum for leopard is 800mhz ... but how well does it actually run? is it worth purchasing leopard if you have 1Ghz?
Thanks
Chris

Hi, Nomad.c. How fast any OS runs on any computer is a lot more than you could reasonably expect to learn from any YouTube video.
We've seen posts here from people who had installed Leopard even on Tibooks that didn't meet the minimum processor-speed requirement of 867MHz (not 800MHz). They seemed to be happy with it by and large, but they may have had reasonable expectations going in. It won't be faster than what you're running now, but it will have some new features; you may or may not find them valuable. But you'd better have your Tibook's RAM maxed out at 1GB, because Leopard is much greedier for RAM than Tiger or Panther. That means if you use RAM-hungry applications on top of Leopard, you're going to make greater use of virtual memory than you have up to now, and VM is many times slower than real RAM.

Aperture on a macbook - how well does it run?

Hi,
Out of curisoity, how fast does Aperture run on a macbook? I know, it is not officially supported, but regardless, it will install, but how well does it actually run when processing RAW files?

Unfortunately we do not have a speedometer that measures application performance. However, numerous folks have commented subjectively with a wide variation of commentary. Review all the threads with Macbook in the title.
Do note that later versions of application software historically have typically required stronger systems than earlier versions needed. I am not saying that v2 will be more demanding than v1 (because I do not know) but I will say that folks who configure a computer should be buying for the apps and OSs of the next 2-4 years moreso than for today's apps and OS.
Also note that Apple officially considers the MacBooks inadequate to run Aperture. Any Aperture user who buys a MacBook should be intending only light Aperture usage (whatever "light" usage is).
Personally buying a light duty laptop to run heavy duty graphics applications does not make sense to me, but quite a few folks seem intent to do so; the argument being that the MacBook would only be for field review, and a powerful desktop box would do the heavy Aperture work.
Some interesting speed tests are at <http://www.creativemac.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=43717> but unfortunately the apps used do not include Aperture.
-Allen Wicks

How well does office for mac 2011 run on yosemite?

How well does MS office for mac 2011 run on Yosemite?

MacBook Pro late-2011, running Yosemite Beta 6. MS Office works just fine. No glitch whatsoever.
Cheers,
JP

How well does Final Cut Pro X run on an off-the-shelf 21.5" iMac?

I'm looking at purchasing an iMac for video editing projects but my budget is very limited. How well does a plain-jane iMac 21.5" (SATA 5400 RPM Drive, Iris Pro Graphics, 8 GB RAM) run FCPX?
Currently at my office I'm running FCPX on a Mid-2010 model with the 3.06 Core i3, 4GB of RAM and a Radeon HD 4670 256 MB. It is more than adequate for my needs in both FCPX and Motion 5. Will the current base model compare favorably to the one I'm already using?

Ian R. Brown wrote:
Most of the drives in MacBookPros were only 5,400rpm and I don't recollect them causing any problems with editing.
Yup, depends on simplicity and what you can "get away with".
Al

How well does a Macbook pro and a Macbook air run Xcode, Photoshop and Dreamweaver?

How well does a Macbook pro and a Macbook air run Xcode, Photoshop and Dreamweaver?

MacBook Pro - no problem, it is an extremely popular computer for running that software. Just look at the Adobe demo videos of their products, most of the time you can see a MacBook Pro running the software in their video.
MacBook Air - should be just as good most of the time.
However, if you get involved in heavy Photoshop work like highly stacked layers/masks/channels, 16 bits per channel or up, or merging HDR or panoramas, the MacBook Pro may be better because it can take 16GB RAM while the MacBook Air can take only 8GB RAM.
Also, if you are going to do serious programming in XCode or Dreamweaver, you may find the MacBook Air screen to be too small for all of the code windows and tool palettes that you may want to open and arrange in those programs. The 15" Retina screen of the MacBook Pro will let you spread out your work and do less window switching. The 11/"13" MacBook Air screens are both smaller and non-Retina so not as sharp.
Even Photoshop is nicer on the 15" MacBook Pro because of the extra screen space for the image with less intrusion by the tool palettes.
In short, if you are a casual user the MacBook Air will be great. If you are a professional with a heavy workload the MacBook Pro may be more efficient overall due to the larger screen and higher RAM capacity.

How well does final cut x run on 10.6 macbook pro?

how well does final cut x run on 10.6 macbook pro?

Which MBPro?
Most will be OK from 2009 on.
Al

How well does windows work?

How well does windows work on a Mac? I am thinking of getting a mac book pro and I would want to use the MAC OSX most of the time but sometimes on the road I will need to use windows for work. If I install windows also how well does it work?? Have you had any problems?

Lots of questions! I'll do what I can, I am newish to Macs and not an IT expert.
I use a MacBook when out and about, it seems fine, better when I upped the ram and HD. I'm not sure whether "better" is the right term. The pro's bigger screen and keyboard may be useful - your choice. The MacBook is my choice because of weight and price, I'm not sure what to get next time. I think I prefer portability for travel and Mac Pro power for deskbased work. The graphics driver would be the deciding factor for Cad etc for me. Not an issue so far and it's a 2 year old MacBook.
I did put a new hard drive in, the partitions were too small. A 250gb drib=ve is MUCH cheaper than a new machine, simple to install. I allowed the max XP partition at 30gb (FAT).
AV - antivirus software for XP - essential to keep clean files.
Leopard - run BootCamp and follow the instructions. It will tell you when to insert the XP disk etc. Mine was choosy about the XP version, you need a recent one. Early SP1 just don't work.
I prefer to use BootCamp and not Fusion etc - simply to maximise the MacBook resources - it's not sharing anything. That may be why I can run the apps. You just need a little planning on what you are going to work on.
Think that's all , as I said, I'm just a user.

How well does Qmaster via Compressor work with FCP 7?

How well does Qmaster via Compressor work with FCP 7?

It works wonderfully as long as you are running (at least) OSX 10.5.6 + QT 7.6 on a serious intel mac.
x

How well does OSX Yosemite run on a Mid 2007 iMac?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for