HP 3852A Data scanning speed

Hi Labview users
I have 3852A DAQ, which is connected by GPIB-USB-B. It's data scanning/updating speed is lower than expected. It's reading 32 data (23 of thermocouple, and 9 of analog voltage), and the data updated every 2 seconds (While loop is set to run as fast as it can). When it reads smaller number(2 or 3) of data, it runs faster. I want to know if there is any way that I can increase the data scanning speed faster than every 2 seconds. I attached my VI for review. Thank you.
Attachments:
Main_ver_latest.vi ‏77 KB

Your program can be simplified a lot, but probably the speed is determined solely by the measurement speed of the HP.
Not that bad for a multimeter that has to read out thermocouples at good resolution anyway.
So first check the measurement speed, and than try to add more multimeters to speed things up.
greetings from the Netherlands

Similar Messages

Problems with Photoshop performance and data transfer speed on iMac

Two months ago, I started noticing slow performances using Photoshop (above all using clone stamp tool) on my 27" iMac (late 2012). I did the AHT and I found that 8GB of 32GB RAM were broken.
I removed them but the problem didn't disappered, I also noticed that data transfer speed (both copy and paste from/to internal HD and from CF card/external HD) was really slow.
I tried many solutions suggested by Apple support, none of them worked out. At the end, I tried uninstalling and re-installing Photoshop: no more problems!!!
10 days ago, I received a new 8GB RAM module and so I installed it back... suddenly, the problem came back, I tried re-installing again Photoshop but the problem, this time, still persist!
Does anyone had the same experience? All other CC programs work well (LR, AE, Premiere...)

yes, it does!
what seems to be very strange to me is how data trasnfer speed could be affected!
(just to say, I've already tried reset of SMC and PRAM, I've tried with different accounts and I've also re-installed the OS, next step would be formatting the disk and installing the OS from zero)

How to increase AFP data transfer speed?

When I connect to our server from a WAN source outside of our facility the file data transfer rate is extremely slow. We just upgraded to a 10Mps fiber service and that has dematically increased our website data tranfer speed. I would like to find a way to access the file server from remote location and work, but the data transfer rate makes productivity impossible. I would appreciate hearing how other organizations are set-up and functioning with file transfer sizes at an average of 10 to 15 Mb.
Thanks,
Brian
OS10.6.8 Server,

If you don't have enough network bandwidth for your time requirements, you have little chance of success with the direct approach. Techniques such as file compression and such can only provide limited help. If you're transfering multiple copies of the files, then you can push one copy of the file to a hosted provider, and then serve additional copies from there.
As for your network, a ten million bits per second network connection is the speed of first-generation Ethernet. That Ethernet was a fast network, back in 1985. In the era of a one billion bits per second Gigabit Ethernet and increasingly commonly with the ten gigabit Ethernet links, a 10 Mb link is glacial.
A typical DSL network is asymmetric, meaning you'll have 10 Mb down (theoretically) and some fraction of that up. So you might not be getting that 10 Mb in the direction you're coppying files. And this is best case; various of the ISP network links around aren't providing their rated speeds.
AFP stinks on a network, and you're also opening up your file system to remote attackers.
As for WebDAV, read this. In addition to WebDAV, you can also try an sftp or other "simpler" copy command as a test, and see what you get for that. (sftp is also encrypted, which has benefits, though the encryption also requires more processing time.)
But beyond techniques such as data compression (and which may or may not be an option here) or incremental or "delta" changes to the data (which probably isn't an option here) or working locally and batching over the changes, there are few good ways to contend with a too-slow-for-your-needs link.

Very slow network directory listing - but fast data transfer speed once listed?

Hello,
I have really tried to sort this myself before opening up to the community, however I have run out of ideas, and hope someone can offer the magic solution I have missed.
I am currently using the 3.4ghz i7 iMac on a 1GB LAN, running OSX10.7.2 - connecting to a Windows Server 2008 (Running Release 2) over ethernet.
If i go to a network directory that i haven't recently accessed it can take up to 60 seconds to show the contents of that directory. Once i have accessed that folder, if i come out of it and go back in it will be instant again - but the first time it lists the directory it looks like i have opened an empty folder - which after anything from 10seconds to 1 minute will suddenly show the files that are there.
Internet connectivity is fast through the network, and file transfers across the LAN are fast. (showing as approx 300mb per second) I can play and edit HD content across the network with no slowdown so I am confident that this issue is not related to the network speed itself, and is more to do with a setting on this mac.
Symptoms are very similar to this post: https://discussions.apple.com/message/12245148?messageID=12245148&amp%3b#1224514 8 - however i understand that in OSX Lion - SMB was removed - so i cannot find this file to edit.
I have tried bypassing additional hubs in the network by wiring direct cables to the switch that is connected to the file server, this made no difference.
I have also tried disconnecting the ethernet cable, and running over wifi. This fixes the listing problem, but when editing HD content over a network drive, this connection is not fast enough to carry the data without interruption (some projects are linked to up to 900gb of hd video content!)
Using ethernet, I have tried DHCP, DHCP with manual address, and manual mode. All reproduce this problem. i have tried using the windows workgroup, and tried without it.
I have also followed this suggestion: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2134936?threadID=2134936&tstart=45 and used OpenDNS. this did not fix the issue.
For argument sake, I have also just tested a Macbook Pro running Snow Leopard to see if it was OS related. This reproduces the exact same problem, near instant directory listing on the wifi, a long and arduous wait on ethernet.
I cannot work out why directory listing is instant over wifi, but not over ethernet on 2 different macs, running 2 different versions of OSX. I also do not understand why if the network is having trouble listing the directories - the data transfer speed is 300mbps when i copy files across the wired network from the file server to the mac.
Does anyone have any other ideas as to what could be the problem here? We are about to start work on a very large project, where the content we are editing is spread out across around 200 different network folders (different shoots captured over the past 2 years). We really don't have the time to wait 60 seconds each time we need to access one of those directories to look for a file, and I am very close to pulling all my hair out!
I really look forward to hearing from anyone who can offer any insight.

If you are suspecting that the Windows update had something to do with your LAN going slow, then try the following:
1. Look for updates for your clients LAN NIC driver; or
2. Un-install the updates.

Adobe Acrobat XI Pro.   Scanning SPEED is very SLOW (1) page in 30 seconds        EPSON Scanner softwear    speed is (27) per Minute

HELP    with   Scanning Speed
[email protected]

May 26, 2014 @ 12:59pm - ADOBE
        In receipt of below Message.
            We would never went to store & obtain ...... ADOBE Acrobat - PRO,
            if we had known about it taking ................... (45) Seconds in ADOBE to ( scan ) a simple - Black & White sheet.
            EPSON Scanner using Adobe software   scans at .................... (27) sheet a Minute.

Data Retrieval Speed in Oracle Spatial vs. ESRI ArcSDE

I would appreciate any opinions regarding data retrieval
performance between Oracle Spatial and ESRI ArcSDE. Would an end-
user (using ESRI software) experience significant differences in
data retrieval speed depending on how the data were stored in
Oracle (MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY verses ESRI Binary/Blob formats).
Knowing that the ESRI binary formats are tailored to their
software front-end apps (ArcGIS, ArcMap, ArcCatalog, and
ArcInfo), wouldn't this be a "non-issue" until the spatial
dataset gets "large", and even then, wouldn't performance be
(almost) equal if the spatial indexes were created properly?
Thanks for your inputs,
Bruce

John,
You can't do that type of query in sql from sql*plus using
SDEBINARY. HOwever, you can perform spatial queries in ArcMap
if you are using SDEBINARY.
You can use the query builder to perform point-in-polygon type
queries.
Hope that helps.
For my two cents, I think SDO_GEOMETRY gives you a more robust
database to work with, because you have the added power of
Oracle Spatial functions. If you are using SDEBINARY you are
limited to only what you can do thru ArcGIS.
If you are concerned more about performance than accessibility,
especially with a large number of users, then SDEBINARY might
be the better choice.
I love Oracle Spatial and am hoping that the performance issue
will not be a serious one when we start putting ArcIMS developed
apps into production.
Dave

Xserve Data Written speeds

Due to an application upgrade for one of our departments, I had to upgrade our Xserve G5 w/megaraid from 10.3.9 to 10.5.7. Since the upgrade, I have noticed that the internal drive speed seems to be slow when our apps are attempting to do a mysqldump of the databases (internal drive to internal drive). Diagnostics don't show any problems.
When I go to Activity Monitor, it shows the Data Read speed as 8 - 12MB /sec (sometimes a little lower or higher) and a Data Written speed of around 6MB - 8MB /sec (sometimes a little higher, but sometimes much lower around 1 - 2MB /sec).
Is this normal? I'm not sure what the "normal" data write speed is for Xserve PCI RAID hard drives? I have three 80GB Apple module drives on a RAID-5 via megaraid.
Thanks.

Similar problem here. I have three Mac (iMac, MacBook PB G4) connected to the same AE and the attached USB hard drive. Every one of them recognise the changes I did to the hard drive except the iMac. Doesnt has a clue what's going on.

Internal Disk to Disk Data Transfer Speed Very Slow

I have a G5 Xserve running Tiger with all updates applied that has recently started experiencing very slow Drive to Drive Data transfer speeds.
When transferring data from one drive to another ( Internal to Internal, Internal to USB, Internal, Internal to FW, USB to USB or any other combination of the three ) we only are getting about 2GB / hr transfer speeds.
I initially thought the internal drive was going bad. I tested the drive and found some minor header issues etc... that were able to be repaired so I replace the internal boot drive
I tested and immediately got the same issue.
I also tried booting from a FW drive and I got the same issue.
If I connect to the server over the ethernet network, I get what I would expect to be typical data transfer rates of about 20GB+ / hr. Much higher than the internal rates and I am copying data from the same internal drives so I really don't think the drive is the issue.
I called AppleCare and discussed the issue with them. They said it sounded like a controller issue so I purchased a replacement MLB from them. After replacing the drive data transfer speeds jumped back to normal for about a day maybe two.
Now we are back to experiencing slow data transfer speeds internally ( 2GB / hr ) and normal transfer speeds ( 20GB+ / hr ) over the network.
Any ideas on what might be causing the problem would be appreciated

As suggested, do check for other I/O load on the spindles. And check for general system load.
I don't know of a good GUI in-built I/O monitor here (and particularly for Tiger Server), though there is iopending and DTrace and Apple-provided [performance scripts|http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1992] with Leopard and Leopard Server. top would show you busy processes.
Also look for memory errors and memory constraints and check for anything interesting in the contents of the system logs.
The next spot after the controllers (and it's usually my first "hardware" stop for these sorts of cases, and usually before swapping the motherboard) are the disks that are involved, and whatever widgets are in the PCI slots. Loose cables, bad cables, and spindle-swaps. Yes, disks can sometimes slow down like this, and that's not usually a Good Thing. I know you think this isn't the disks, but that's one of the remaining common hardware factors. And don't presume any SMART disk monitoring has predictive value; SMART can miss a number of these cases.
(Sometimes you have to use the classic "field service" technique of swapping parts and of shutting down software pieces until the problem goes away. Then work from there.)
And the other question is around how much time and effort should be spent on this Xserve G5 box; whether you're now in the market for a replacement G5 box or a newer Intel Xserve box as a more cost-effective solution.
(How current and how reliable is your disk archive?)

Data Load Speed

Hi all.
We are starting the implementation of SAP at the company I work and I am designated to prepare the Data Load of the legacy systems. I have already asked our consultants about the data load speed but they didn´t answer really what I need.
Does anyone have a statistic of the data load speed using tools like LSMW, CATT, eCATT, etc... per hour?
I know that the speed depends of what data I´m loading and also the CPU speed but any information is good to me.
Thank you and best regards.

hi friedel,
Again here is the complete details regarding data transfer techniques.
Call Transaction:
1.Synchronous Processing
2.Synchronous and Asynchrounous database updates
3.Transfer of data for individual transaction each time CALL TRANSACTION statement is executed.
4.No batch input log gets generated
5.No automatic error handling.
Session Method:
1.Asynchronous Processing
2.Synchronous database updates.
3.Transfer of data for multiple transaction
4.Batch input log gets generated
5.Automatic error handling
6.SAP's standard approach
Direct Input Method:
1.Best suited for transferring large amount of data
2.No screens are processed
3.Database is updated directly using standard function modules.eg.check the program RFBIBL00.
LSMW.
1.A code free tool which helps you to transfer data into SAP.
2.Suited for one time transfer only.
CALL DIALOG.
This approach is outdated and you should choose between one of the above techniques..
Also check the knowledge pool for more reference
http://help.sap.com
Cheers,
Abdul Hakim

NI8451 SPI data transfer speed and SCLK setup time adjustment

I'm using NI USB-8451 SPI bus to do communication. I can not reach the speed of communication 4MHz (NI USB-8451 module advertises speeds up to 12MHz). Actrually the data transfer speed is much slower than 4/8 Mb/s. The 16k*16bit data cost around 800ms while it should be 128ms if the data transfer achieves 4Mhz speed. In the manual there is a SPI timing clock figure like this:
In the 4Mhz communication case, the t2 should be 0.25us. I wonder whether the low data transfer speed is due to t1,t3 and t4 since they occupy too much "dead time". If my guess is right, is there any method to reduce the t1,t3 or t4, espetially t3? I know that in the advanced API there is a way to add delay while I did not figure out how to reduce delay(t3). If my guess is wrong, what is the exactly maximum data transfer speed NI8451 can support? (not the clock rate)
Thanks for help.

Hi everyone. Im using the SPI communication with 8451 and Im having the same situation., since the serial flash memory I need to program is big enough, t3 (SCLK Setup time) and other "dead time" which I think is the time when buffer on the 8451 needs to be re-filled those are killing my expectation on the final results. I can't see a way to decrease t3 (~10uSec) and in the same way Im seeing something like buffering up to 100~110 bytes then, a ~1.5mSec delay appears on the signal waveforms. Did somebody have good results trying to avoid this?
Thank you.
Javier
Attachments:
t3 - SCLK setup time.jpg ‏156 KB
Data byte Transfer_109.jpg ‏137 KB

Agilent E4980A Measurement Speed and Data Acquisition Speed

I am using E4980A LCR meter, I need very fast data aquisition unfortunately limited by device own speed with 5.6 ms per measurement which means nearly 178 Hz. I am using usb interface with the software provided by NI, in that program I made some modification taking the reading side of the programme in a while loop .
To test my speed I start the program count 5s and stop saving the results to an excell file. If I plot the results in a graph while programme is working I have 60 Hz speed. If I don't, then it is 80 Hz which are far below the potential maximum speed of 178 Hz. If my lap top battery is very low then my speed is worse. But with no battery problem, my celeron laptop performance is the same as an i7 laptop.
Here it is my programme, it is the same provided NI but some modification. What can I do to have higher data acquisiton speed ?
Probably, USB's speed is not enough but I can not believe that while it can save gigabytes of data in a few min can't take 200 datapoint in 1s. Why can't I have 178 Hz speed now and how can I reach this limit ?
Regards.
Attachments:
Read Measurement.PNG ‏44 KB
Read Measurement.PNG ‏44 KB

Instrument communications via serial, USB, Ethernet, GPIB, etc just tend to be slow. The instrument has to interpret the data, react to it, and then send data back. That takes time. A few ms per measurement is quite normal. One option you might have is you could tell the instrument to take several measurements and then request all of the measurements once it is done. I haven't looked into the E4980A yet to see if it can do that.
What exactly are you trying to measure. There might be better ways to get "fast" readings.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions

NSS2000 - Data transfer speeds over gigabit ethernet

I've just installed a NSS2000 on a gigabit network. I'm aware that some of the promised features (like support for jumbo frames) are not currently supported by the current firmware (version 1.13).
However, even without jumbo frames, I'm puzzled of why I am seeing data transfer speeds of only 50megabits per second, or about 5% utilization of the 1000Mb/s connection. I was expecting at least 20% utilization.
Is this another limitation of the current firmware version, or is there a setting somewhere on the NSS2000 which I need to to tweak to increase data transfer speeds?
More background - it is the only significant traffic on the network during test, the ethernet controller driver on my PC is the latest available, and the NSS reports that it is connected at 1000MB/sec. The unit has two 1.5Tb SATA drives in it, which are configuered as RAID1.
Also - does anyone know when the next firmware version is going to be available, and which of the current known issues it is likely to address?
thanks
Graham

I should mention that the volume I am writing to is encrypted - is the answer simply that this is the fastest that the onboard CPU can decrypt the content?
An experiment to an unencrypted volume increased the LAN utilization to around 10% - so an improvement, but still not as high as I had hoped.
thanks
Graham

Recommend me a scanner with good OCR & reasonably good scan speed.

Hi,
I used to have HP F2200 printer/scanner, the OCR was fantastic. It scanned perfectly. The user interface was so intuitive. In face the OCR of that old model even beat the current Canon scanner. I bought the Canon scanner and returned it because the OCR was not up to par.
Because of my previous good experience with HP scanner, I decided to upgrade to a new one.
I bought HP Envy 4504 - so disappointed to realize that OCR is not part of it anymore. I have read in the forums that OCR is not part of the software bundle anymore.
What I want to know now is what HP scanner
- comes with OCR (ie I don't have to buy OCR separately), preferably uses the same OCR product as the HP F2200. Not sure if it is Iris.
- has better scan speed than F2200, but does not need to be super fast.
- don't require a document feeder. I am mostly scanning books so document feeder probably is not going to be of much use.
Thanks.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
I believe I've replied you on other post.
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

NI-8451 in SPI mode and poor data throughput speed. 6us delays between bytes

I'm using 8451 to communicate via SPI with a DSP. I'm using Labview 7.1 (os:winXP), reading the data using "NI-845x SPI Write Read.vi".
Clock rate is with 6 MHz. and data transfer seems to work ok.
Problem is very poor performance:
The bytes are transferred correctly at 6MHz speed, but when I measure the clock and data signals using oscilloscope, there is a 6us delay between bytes. These delays are generated by 8451 , because it's the bus master. What's wrong?
I excepted to get data transfer speed of 6Mb/s, as there is no speed limitations mentationed in 8451 manual. Currently my data throughput is 15% of the nominal speed.

I have the same problem.

Few questions - game loop, data types, speed

Hello, I have a few questions after studying some topics in this forum regarding game creation:
1) What's the fastest way to wait in the game loop? I've seen two approaches:
thread.sleep(10)andsynchronized(this) { wait(10); }2) What data types shall I use? In C++ I use to prefer int over short in all cases, because 32bit hardware works faster with integers. Is this same on cell phones?
3) Speed of applications is slow. I just wonder wheter it's my fault. I was testing application, which only cleared the buffer and outputted FPS and I got around 20 frames. It was Nokia 6300 with 240x320 display. After testing on other phones I've found out that the bigger the resolution, the slower the game is going. Is this normal?
Thanks for replies...

1) You're not going to notice any really speed difference between the two code snippets. Read up on 'Threads', and you'll see why one may be used in place of the other depending on the situation. In general there may be a slight performance loss, however unnoticable, when using the synchronized version, but when you are multithreading it is likely necessary.
sleep(int) is impossible to interrupt, so it's generally a no-no in most situations. However we are talking about devices where every bit of performance helps, so as long as it works for ya, it's not a big deal.
2) The performance difference is fairly negligable, if any. The biggest thing to consider is memory requirements, and shorts take 1/2 the data.
Also, many phones don't support floating point data types, so you'll likely need to use ints/longs to calculate your values if you want to have any accuracy beyond whole numbers. Doing something like shifting bits or using 1000x values in your calculations can get around most of the problems when you can't use floats.
3) The biggest performance killers are IO, memory allocation, screen drawing; pretty much in that order. So I imagine that you are re-creating a new String object every time you output your FPS value on screen right? Doing that every frame would destroy any hopes of getting high-performance.
Just be careful, and never allocate objects when you can avoid it. anything where you concat String objects using + will cause your performance to die a horrible painful slow death. Remove anything that says 'new' from your main loop, and all String operations, and it'll likely speed things up a lot for ya.
Does your main loop have something like this?
g.drawString("FPS: " + currentFps, 0,0,Graphics.TOP | Graphics.LEFT);
This is very bad because of the String operation. It'll create a new String every frame.
If you have any more specicif questions, or you'd just like to pick the brain of a mobile game dev, stop by my messageboard:
http://attackgames.proboards84.com
Message was edited by:
hooble

HP 3852A Data scanning speed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for