HP Enterprise Integration Module for SAP - Windows Server 2008

Is there a download for the HP Enterprise Integration Module which will run on Windows Server 2008 for QC Version 10?  HP Support has directed me to SAP Support for the Integration Versino 2.5 and above.

Hello John,
now I have a resolution.
I have deinstalled the MS SQL 2008 and install MS SQL 2005 plus SP2 at windows 2008 64bit VMware.
After reinstall HP Quality Center everything works fine.
( SQL 2008 is not official supported )
But there is another problem with the HP Enterprise Integration module 2.50 for SAP Solution Manager 7.0 EhP1,
the installer has a problem and does not work at windows 2008.
- this is a known HP problem and they should be published a newer version without the installer problem.
Today (april 6) I can't find an update, takes a while ... the "bad" version "setup_win.exe" has 132.327 kb.
you can only download the package from:
http://update.external.hp.com/qualitycenter/qc100/ent/enterprise_integration/index.html
you can find all add-ins at:
http://update.external.hp.com/qualitycenter/qc100/index.html
You should patch HP QC 10.00 with patch 10, see note 1329891 for details, takes 10 minutes or so.
With reards,
Michael

Similar Messages

  • Disk Partition for EHP4/Windows server 2008/SQL server 2008

    Hi All
    What is the drive partition recommendation for EHP4 ERP6 on Windows  server 2008 and SQL server 2008? I have checked the notes/ SAP Documents  but have not find any information related with SAP recommendation on this. Please help.
    I need the recommended partition size for  SAP application , transaction log,  SAP datafiles , MS SQL server installation files for DEV/QUA/Production 
    If you have a similar landscape for EHP4 ,  can you check in your DEV,QUA, Production set up  and tell the allocated and used partition size for SAP application, transaction log, SAP datafiles, MS SQL server installation files.
    Regards
    Sahad

    Hello Sahad
    As described by Markus and also, i want to share my company landscape information.
    We are using HP SAN Environment with using the SAP SR2 SQL 2005 and Win 2003 on HP Itanium Processor.
    We had reserved and present the following vdisk from the SAN Environment to the PRD server.
    F:\DATABASE                     600GB   RAID 5      ( still 200 GB free ** we lived our system on 1 Aug 2007)
    L:\TRANSACTION LOG         30GB   RAID 1      ( Expanded up to the disk space ** make backup 4 times a day )
    T:\TEMPDB                              1GB   RAID 1
    K:\KERNEL                         100 GB   RAID 5       (30 GB Free ** updaing kernely and EW tools upon the latest availability)
    Regards
    Anwer Waseem

  • Flash player for x64 windows server 2008 r2????

    I was running IE 7 and flash was fine.  I upgraded to IE10 (sick of all the 'you're using an unsupported browser' messages).  Flash player update window appears suggesting I need to upgrade my player, telling me that the correct version for my browser and OS will appear automatically.  I upgrade and now have no flash player at all.  Can anyone help?   Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard Version 6.1(build 7601:Service Pack 1)

    Check
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/885448
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/867968

  • RAID Management Software for TS130 (Windows Server 2008 R2)

    Hello, I'm needing assistance locating RAID management software for the TS130 in Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard. In Device Manager, the drive has the following hardware ID: "IDE\DiskRAID11.0.00__".  Does anyone know of a utility to check and monitor the health of this RAID array from within Windows?

    Hi beau_goldkey,
    Thank you for pointing out that we don't have the Intel RAID Management GUI software on the TS130 support page.  We'll work on getting that resolved.  In the meantime, the same software is used for the TS140 and can be found here.
    I apologize for the inconvenience!

  • Enterprise Hotfix Rollup for Win7 and Server 2008 R2 via WSUS

    I stumbled across the fact that Microsoft released a hotfix rollup for Win7 and Server 2008 R2 that contains 90 hotfixes
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2775511/en-us
    The articled I linked above talks about after installing 2775511 (the big hotfix rollup containing 90 hotfixes) it is also necessary to install three more hotfixes:
    After this update is installed, you must install update 2732673 to fix a regression issue in the Rdbss.sys file
    After this update is installed, you must install update 2728738 to fix a regression issue in the Profsvc.dll file
    After this update is installed, you must install update 2878378 re-released on November 11, 2013 to fix a regression issue in the Advapi32.dll file
    I have imported all four of these hotfixes into my WSUS server. Do I need to install 277551 first and then install the other three or can all four be approved and go out at once? I guess I am hung up on the language of "After this update is installed
    .... ". I want to put all 4 of these on our Win7 machines as well as my 40+ WinServer 2008 R2 machines

    I read somewhere that over half of the updates included in Win7 SP1 and WinServer 2008 R2 SP1 were originally released as hotfixes. This means Microsoft made the decision that a large number of hotfixes would benefit every user of these two OSs
    I think your conclusion is flawed. The only thing that you can draw from the presented statistic, is that Microsoft determined that a significant percentage of updates originally released as hotfixes warranted the additional investment in regression testing
    to subsequently release those hotfixes as updates.
    The fact that they bundled these 90 hotfixes together leads me to the same conclusion.
    In fact, exactly the opposite conclusion applies: What you have in this package is all the rest of the stuff that didn't make that cut. What you have in this package are still NOT-regression tested hotfixes, they've just been bundled up for easy deployment
    (and note that three of them got further broken in the process of bundling), causing yet three more hotfixes to have to be released.
    In fact I read the MS Team Blog about this big hotfix release and they say the same thing, all users of these OSs would benefit from the installation of this hotfix rollup, not just a subset of users.
    I suspect there are a notable number of patch administrators and systems administrators who would disagree with that self-serving promotion. If, in fact, it's true that "all users" would benefit, then the product team should have invested the effort in properly
    regression testing those hotfixes, and releasing them as REAL updates. They did not; ergo the *actual* value is less than claimed.
    Of course the bugaboo here is the fact that three other individual hotfixes need to be installed after the big hotfix rollup is installed.
    Exactly! (And those are just the attempted fixes that broke something. Who knows how many other "fixes" may still result in newly discovered "broken stuff" that was never broken in the first place.)
    The second part of this question should revolve around an itemized review of the hotfixes contained in this rollup with one simple question asked for each:
    Have we actually *experienced* the issue addressed by this hotfix.
    Where hotfixes are concerned one very simple but important rule applies:
    If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it!
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    SolarWinds Head Geek
    Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
    My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
    http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
    The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

  • I can't install service pack 1 for my Windows server 2008 R2

    I  found an error inside the log as amd64_microsoft-windows-lsa_31bf3856ad364e35_6.1.7601.17514_none_04709031736ac277\lsass.exe [HRESULT = 0x80070002 - ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND]
    Where can I find that file ? Any suggestion ?

    Please run the system update readiness tool.
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/What-is-the-System-Update-Readiness-Tool?SignedIn=1
    Then post the complete contents of;
    %SYSTEMROOT%\Logs\CBS\CheckSUR.log
    Regards, Dave Patrick ....
    Microsoft Certified Professional
    Microsoft MVP [Windows]
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

  • Integration Kit for SAP - Open SQL access to tables. List incomplete.

    After we install the BO integration kit for SAP and CR 2008 we were able to connect to SAP and open SAP Data Dictionnary tables (Open SQL access).
    I have a problem however:
    when I display the list of available tables, the is not showing all the tables in the SAP system. I believe it stops at some point.
    I see all tables with low letters or starting with /BIC...
    I have custom tables with names ranging from ZR1 to ZR5.
    Of these I only see tables up to ZR2*.
    My guess is :
    either that the table list displayed is limited to a certain mumber of tables
    or that there are some authorisations issues to be solved to view all tables (but the same SAP User sees all tables in SE11)
    or there is a table related setting in the Data dictionnary that makes some tables visible by CR and other not
    Thanks in advance for any answer.
    Claudio Ciardelli

    correct - it stops at one point because showing you more than 30.000 tables doesn't really help. Right click on your connection (server entry), select the menu options, there is an entry called Table name like. in your case enter Z% and hit F5 for a refresh and you will only get tables shown starting with Z
    Ingo

  • Installation Support of SAP Kernel Products on Vista / Windows Server 2008

    one of the major design goals of Vista and Microsoft Server 2008 is to harden the operating system against unauthorized attacks from viruses, trojan horses etc.
    The most important change in Vista/Windows Server 2008 (formerly longhorn)  is: a process running under a user account which belongs to the local administrators group does not run with administrative priviledges as long the process is not elevated to the administrative level.
    Elevation can be done by starting the process per Explorer using <b>Run As Administrator</b> or using special APIs, which are new in Vista. Programs started with <b>Run as Administrator</b> will not be able to start subprocesses elevated without additional changes (compared to Windows XP / Server 2003).
    Security settings of many Windows system objects like Directories and Registry Hives etc are much more restrictive in Vista compared to Windows Server 2003 / XP. In some functions SAPinst tries to access registry keys and values for enumeration with full access which is no longer possible in Vista.
    In other words: without code changes in SAPInst for Vista / Windows Server 2003 there will be no possibility to install a SAP System on these platforms.
    If you do not have a SAP note stating the opposit or if you do not have a PAM (Product Availability Matrix) entry promising support for Vista / Windows Server 2008 the probability is about 99.9 percent (or even higher) that the installation will <b>not</b> run.
    regards
    Peter

    > >>If you do not have a SAP note stating the opposit
    > or
    > but there is nothing with what I wrote: Note 1054740
    > describes how to evaluate 7.00 based products.
    ...on Windows Longhorn (which will be your quoted Windows Server 2008)
    > This version will work - but the rest  - especially
    > those ECC5 or 4.7 based IDES or MiniSAP systems or
    > all that stuff which is widely copied through some
    > unknown channels will not install.
    yes, that's true.
    I know of efforts porting MaxDB to Vista (there are some PTS'ses open) but generally one can say, that products below 7.00 are unlikely to work short term.
    Markus

  • 10.1.0.2.0 database download link needed for window server 2008 64bit

    Here is our plan. We are currently running oracle 10.1.0.2 database on a windowsServer 2003 32 bit.
    Now we would like to migrate the database to 10gR2 and run it on our new server windows server 2008 64bit. After doing research, I think I need to go through the following step:
    1) install 10.1.0.2 on our new server,
    2) clone the database using the current back up data on the new server.
    3) install 10gR2 on the new server.
    4) using dbua to upgrade the older database to the new version.
    Please let me know whether those steps are correct.
    If yes, where can I download 10.1.0.2 version database for 64bit window server 2008?
    The only link I can find is http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/index.html
    but 10gR1 not listed.
    Thank you very much!

    Welcome to the forums !
    10gR1 is de-supported, hence you will not find any download links. You will have to create an SR to see if Support can mail you the install media.
    How big is the database ? One other option you have is to export the 10.1.0.2 database and import into 10gR2 on the new server. This will achieve the upgrade in one step and will not require the intermediate 10.1.0.2 version on the new server.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14238/preup.htm#BABFHFIJ
    MOS Doc 419550.1- Different Upgrade Methods For Upgrading Your Database
    HTH
    Srini

  • Driver Security Certificate Expiration Issue on Windows Server 2008

    Hi,
    We want to install Oracle Database 10g Release 2 RAC (10.2.0.4.0) Enterprise for Microsoft Windows Server 2008 x64. When installing Oracle Cluster Ready Services on Windows Server 2008, the prerequisite check fails with the following message:
    "Security certificates for OCFS and Orafence drivers on Windows Server 2008 have expired"
    Can somebody please point a download location from Metalink from where we can download the latest drivers?

    Hi Satish,
    thank you for your reply. I also found this bug on metalink and did as they wrote there (change the date before 2009). It worked, pre requirments assistant is now ok, but after setting private/public interfaces section it fails with error message:
    "Unable to collect and verify hardware information on all nodes" ...
    This is the same error I got in 11g as well, because I already had a post yesterday about this bug in this section :(
    The strange thing is that now cluster verification passes the system architecture check for (10.2.0.4), but it fails during the installation of CRS.
    We are already have an SR with Metalink, but unfortunately they are not much of a help :(
    D:\10204_vista_w2k8_x64_production_crs\clusterware\cluvfy>runcluvfy stage -pre crsinst
    -n rac1,rac2 -verbose
    Performing pre-checks for cluster services setup
    Checking node reachability...
    Check: Node reachability from node "RAC1"
    Destination Node Reachable?
    rac2 yes
    rac1 yes
    Result: Node reachability check passed from node "RAC1".
    Checking user equivalence...
    Check: User equivalence for user "Administrator"
    Node Name Comment
    rac2 passed
    rac1 passed
    Result: User equivalence check passed for user "Administrator".
    Checking administrative privileges...
    Checking node connectivity...
    Interface information for node "rac2"
    Interface Name IP Address Subnet
    PublicLAN 172.17.10.23 172.17.10.0
    PublicLAN 172.17.10.201 172.17.10.0
    PrivateLAN 192.168.10.21 192.168.10.0
    Interface information for node "rac1"
    Interface Name IP Address Subnet
    PublicLAN 172.17.10.22 172.17.10.0
    PublicLAN 172.17.10.200 172.17.10.0
    PrivateLAN 192.168.10.11 192.168.10.0
    Check: Node connectivity of subnet "172.17.10.0"
    Source Destination Connected?
    rac2:PublicLAN rac2:PublicLAN yes
    rac2:PublicLAN rac1:PublicLAN yes
    rac2:PublicLAN rac1:PublicLAN yes
    rac2:PublicLAN rac1:PublicLAN yes
    rac2:PublicLAN rac1:PublicLAN yes
    rac1:PublicLAN rac1:PublicLAN yes
    Result: Node connectivity check passed for subnet "172.17.10.0" with node(s) rac2,rac1.
    Check: Node connectivity of subnet "192.168.10.0"
    Source Destination Connected?
    rac2:PrivateLAN rac1:PrivateLAN yes
    Result: Node connectivity check passed for subnet "192.168.10.0" with node(s) rac2,rac1.
    Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "172.17.10.0":
    rac2 PublicLAN:172.17.10.23 PublicLAN:172.17.10.201
    rac1 PublicLAN:172.17.10.22 PublicLAN:172.17.10.200
    Suitable interfaces for the private interconnect on subnet "192.168.10.0":
    rac2 PrivateLAN:192.168.10.21
    rac1 PrivateLAN:192.168.10.11
    ERROR:
    Could not find a suitable set of interfaces for VIPs.
    Result: Node connectivity check failed.
    Checking system requirements for 'crs'...
    Check: Operating system version
    Node Name Available Required Comment
    rac2 Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2008 passed
    rac1 Windows Server 2008 Windows Server 2008 passed
    Result: Operating system version check passed.
    Check: Total memory
    Node Name Available Required Comment
    rac2 8GB (8387020KB) 1GB (1048576KB) passed
    rac1 8GB (8387020KB) 1GB (1048576KB) passed
    Result: Total memory check passed.
    Check: Swap space
    Node Name Available Required Comment
    rac2 16.05GB (16826288KB) 1GB (1048576KB) passed
    rac1 16.05GB (16826288KB) 1GB (1048576KB) passed
    Result: Swap space check passed.
    Check: System architecture
    Node Name Available Required Comment
    rac2 64-bit 64-bit passed
    rac1 64-bit 64-bit passed
    Result: System architecture check passed.
    Check: Free disk space in "C:\" dir
    Node Name Available Required Comment
    rac2 20.21GB (21190416KB) 400MB (409600KB) passed
    rac1 19.98GB (20948624KB) 400MB (409600KB) passed
    Result: Free disk space check passed.
    System requirement passed for 'crs'
    Pre-check for cluster services setup was unsuccessful on all the nodes.

  • CF7 on Windows Server 2008

    Hello, does anyone know if you can install ColdFusion MX7 on
    a Windows Server 2008 64-bit Operating System?
    Thanks.
    Tim

    Well, you have 3 questions here: support for 64 bit, support
    for Windows Server 2008, and support for CF7. Let's take them one
    at a time.
    As for 64-bit, there's an important difference between being
    able to run on a 64-bit OS and being able to run in 32-bit or
    64-bit mode on that 64-bit OS.
    That said, only CF8 supports running in 64-bit mode. Further,
    in 8.0 it was only on Solaris, then 8.01 added Windows (including
    Server 2008 among others), Linux, and Mac.
    64-bit mode is also supported only in CF8 Enterprise
    specifically (not Standard).
    So you can run CF 8 Standard on a supported 64-bit OS, but
    only in 32-bit mode.
    More on 64-bit support at the CF8.01 update FAQs:
    "Does ColdFusion have 64-bit support?"
    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb403277&sliceId=1#_Toc193176415
    and
    "Does ColdFusion Standard have 64-bit support?"
    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb403277&sliceId=1#_Toc193176416
    But you said you want to run CF7. Of course, that's not going
    to allow you to run in 64-bit mode, as discussed above. But you can
    at least install it on a 64-bit machine as long as it's a supported
    OS, running CF in in 32-bit mode. More on that at
    http://www.adobe.com/go/8be22ed6.
    Sadly, for you, Windows Server 2008 is NOT listed as a supported OS
    For CF7. More at
    http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/coldfusion7/systemreqs/.
    To sumarize, you will need to move up to CF8 to get Win2k8 as
    a supported OS, then to 8.01 to get 64-bit support, and then only
    in CF8 Enterprise.
    /charlie

  • Windows Server 2008 R2 - Won't load certain web pages - Happens in all browers - Won't do windows updates

    This server (Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard with SP1) is used to host thin clients as well as RDP sessions.  One morning the office is fine, they come back from lunch and all of the sudden they can't load certain web pages, such as adobe.com
    and pandora.com to name a couple.  This was roughly 3 days ago. 
    1.)  I have tried machines that are not connected to this server (not thin client or RDP), but are on the same network, they can load up any web page fine with no issues.
    2.) On the server I have tried Opera, Chrome, IE and Firefox, all have the same exact problem.
    3.) Tried different DNS servers just to be sure, even though it only effects the server and no one else.
    Based on these facts I know that it is something wrong with the server, but not tied to a specific brower.  In all browsers when you load up a page in question it just sits there with a blank screen trying to load, it never generates any errors. 
    The Event Viewer is also clean, no errors.  So with no errors I have had trouble trying to find a starting place for this.  Things I have tried:
    1.) ipconfig /flushdns to try and clear out any DNS issues
    2.) Changing the DNS servers for the server to 8.8.8.8 and 4.2.2.2
    3.) Scanning for Viruses and Malware/Spyware
    4.) Checking proxy settings on the server
    5.) Updating and then removing Adobe Flash (thought it was tied to flash at first).  Problem persists even with no flash player installed.
    6.) Completed a failed update of .net, no effect
    7.) Loading up browsers in debug mode to try and find anything in the site code that I could relate between failed sites.  I found nothing I could identify
    Of all issues to finally be stumped on this seems like an easy one, but I can't even begin to come up with an idea at this point. 
    I have tried to lay out all of the facts that I know as plainly as I can.  I am hoping that someone has seen this before as this issue is effecting a number of differnt users and keeping them from doing portions of their job.
    Help is most appreciated, thank you!

    I was able to figure out a solution.
    CAUSE:
    It appears that the Internet isn’t fully up to date and ready to use EDns -- which is enabled on Windows Server 2008 R2 by default. The solution for this is to disable Edns. Note that this isn’t
    a problem for most Windows Server 2008 R2 member servers.  It’s only a problem for DNS *servers* that do recursive lookups.  i.e. likely only your domain controller will be affected if that is where your DNS Server role exists.
    SOLUTION:
    To disable EDns, you can do it from the command prompt, or by editing the registry.
    Create a DWORD called EnableEDNSProbes and set to 0 in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\DNS\Parameters
    Restart the DNS Server service for it to take effect.

  • Cisco Security Manager Client running on Windows Server 2008 R2 (64 bit) in Terminal Service

    Hello CSM Gurus,
    Would there be any performance issues in CSM client software design if multiple instances of CSM client by multiple users ran concurrently on a Windows Server 2008 R2(64 bits) while CSM users accessing the server via Remote Desktop Services ?
    In my environment, we have a CSM server at our major data center while security administrators from all over the world need to use this CSM server. 
    In order to overcome the latency of the CSM client due to the WAN network, the plan is to use a Windows Server 2008 R2(64bits) as a terminal server and all security administrators would need to access this terminal server via RDP and would launch CSM client on their desktop.  The terminal server locates on the same LAN as the CSM server itself in order to minimize network latency in communications between the CSM clients running on the terminal server and the CSM server.  there would be multiple instances of CSM clients running concurrently on the Windows Server 2008 R2, the terminal server. 

    Hi;
    please check
    Oracle Database 11g Release 1 (11.1.0.7.0) <<Oracle Database 11g Release 1 (11.1.0.7.0) for Microsoft Windows Server 2008 x64
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle11g/111070_win64_2008soft.html
    Check Database 11g Release 2 Certification Highlights [ID 1065024.1]
    But please check this thread
    client 11gR2 install on Win 7 Pro fails java.lang.NullPointerException
    Regard
    Helios
    Edited by: Helios- Gunes EROL on May 14, 2010 4:49 PM

  • Enabling Windows Server 2008 R2 Built-In Administrator Account

    The properties box for my Windows Server 2008 R2 built-in administrator program says the account is disabled.  Even the primary user account has virtually no priveliges.  How can I, with a mere primary user account available at logon, enable
    the built-in administrator account, or otherwise grant my primary user account administrator priveliges?  Windows Server 2008 R2 denies my primary user account access/permission for nearly all changes to accounts, programs and OS features. 
    Stephen W Plunkett

    The properties box for my Windows Server 2008 R2 built-in administrator program says the account is disabled.  Even the primary user account has virtually no priveliges.  How can I, with a mere primary user account available at logon,
    enable the built-in administrator account, or otherwise grant my primary user account administrator priveliges?  Windows Server 2008 R2 denies my primary user account access/permission for nearly all changes to accounts, programs and OS features. 
    Stephen W Plunkett
    In some of the organisations, default admin accounts on member servers are purposefully locked/disabled through group policy for security reasons.
    If you know the password for locked out/disabled admin account then there is a possibility of unlocking/re-enabling the account without using any third party tools.
    To do that,
    Restart the server
    Press F8 and select Safe Mode Without
    Networking
    Log on to the server with locked out/disabled admin account with its password.
    If you could successfully log on to the server then you will have option to unlock and enable the built-in admin account !
    Most of the downtime's are caused because of SysAdmin's curiosity ! - Santosh

  • Oracle 11g compatiblity with Windows Server 2008 R2

    Hello Experts,
    Can 'Oracle Database 11g Release 1 (11.1.0.7.0) for Microsoft Windows Server 2008 x64' be installed on Windows Server 2008 R2 x64?
    Thanks,
    Ashish

    user9208264 wrote:
    Thanks for the response Hans,
    When you said, People have been able to make it work, is there something that needs to be done to make it compatible or can I just ignore following from the compatiblity check in the installatation prerequisites?I do not condone using unsupported, and potentially unsupportable, environments. The risk to the user community in production is too great, especially in that 'it may appear to work, but may just as easily run into an obscure incompatibility'.
    Perhaps someone else will help you shoot yourself in the foot. Or use your favorite internet search ...

Maybe you are looking for