HP SimplePass not waiting for my finger swipe

I have the HP SimplePass software installed and the Validity driver installed. The fingerprint reader is enabled and working.
My problem is that when I go to enrol my finger the software tells me to click on a figer to enroll it, when I click on the finger the software flashes the enrollment screen, with the 0% loading bar on it, then it switches to a message saying "It looks like you are having some trouble. Do you want to try again." I try again and the same thing happens.
I have made sure the sensor is clean and the blue light beside the sensor is activated. The issue appears to be the program not waiting for me to swipe my finger.
Any help or ideas as to how to fix this would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Testing123
Welcome to the HP Community Forum.
I dislike this series of the Support pages -- there is not a Validity Sensor Driver listed for this Series notebook at the Support pages.  It is not common; it does happen for a few models.
Reference:
HP Pavilion dv6-6070ca Entertainment Notebook PC
The problem is that I cannot verify beyond what I can find elsewhere that your fingerprint reader hardware and your software is indeed compatible -- OR that the advice that I can give you is reasonable.
If you end up needing a copy of your Validity Sensor Driver, the following appears to be the correct Driver for your System.
sp55109 Validity Sensor Driver V4.3.205.0
Commentary
The message you are seeing is USUALLY an indication of an incompatibility between the Validity Sensor -- either the Driver / hardware and the version of the HP SimplePass program OR the Driver / hardware and some itch in the File system that impacts the way in which the HP SimplePass program is interpreting the Driver information.  This is speculation and based on experience -- I don't have access to the code, to the File System, and I do not work for HP.
The version level of your Validity Sensor Driver, in and of itself, is adequate to allow you to upgrade to a later version of HP SimplePass than the version available at your computer's Support website.
Because you did not indicate which version of HP SimplePass you are running, I assume you do not know, or that you are running an older SimplePass program.
The following might work for you:
Open the file > Click on Download > Click “Open in Adobe Reader”
Instructions to Upgrade HP SimplePass
If your HP SimplePass is not working:
Start here -- it is possible the issue is not one of anything more than just a bad "tangle":
See Page 10 of the document (at writing) –
Follow the Procedure Pile of Rubble - Hard Reset Sequence
Next
If no joy, go back and follow:
Procedure - Update / (Re) Install HP SimplePass
NOTES:
You are using HP SimplePass Series 6 >> Ignore references to Series 8
Pay attention to Order-of-Events
==============================================================
Click the Kudos Thumbs-Up to say Thank You!
And...Click Accept as Solution when my Answer provides a Fix or Workaround!
I am pleased to provide assistance on behalf of HP. I do not work for HP. 
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur

Similar Messages

  • Process chain Error: This AND process is not waiting for event RSPROCESS

    Hi All,
    I am facing an error in the process chain in PRD.
    Error message: This AND process is not waiting for event RSPROCESS.
    We had a process chain which had two sub chains which run parallel and below of this we had AND process type and below of the AND process we had 4 more jobs.
    Once the two subchains got successfully loaded, the and process should turn to green and further 4 jobs should start.
    It is a daily load , it worked fine from past years,but suddenly the AND processtype is getting failed.The thing is in the two subchains if one got completed, the AND process process is not waiting for 2nd subchain to get completed.The AND process is turning to RED (status: cancelled) . I tried to repeat the AND process once after above 2 subchains loaded, but it didnt worked.
    And i removed the existing AND process and created a new one and placed it in same place and activated and schedules again.but still it is getting failed with same error.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sai Chand.S

    Hi,
    If you did any transports related to that metachain we face similar kind of issues.
    not only the AND process , we need to remove all the process before executing the AND process and create it again.
    It helps you, you said your in production So you should take the proper approvals and do it.
    Regards,
    Yerrabelli.

  • How can I not wait for a RFC response

    Hi everyone, i want to execute an RFC and not wait for the response, i don´t care, so, is there a way to achieve this ? thanks

    Hello Isaac,
    If you are calling the RFC from WebDynpro then you have to wait for the RFC response. However, there is a way that you can get early response from a RFC.
    Suppose you are using RFC1 in your program and it contains business logic. Now, don't directly call the RFC1, instead, write another RFC2 which calls RFC1 asyncronously. This way, when you call RFC2 it automatically call RFC1 and does not wait for any response for RFC1
    You can call RFC1 from RFC2  asynchronously:
    CALL FUNCTION RFC1 STARTING NEW TASK taskName
    Your WD application will immediately get a response from RFC2 while RFC1 still executing.
    To know more about asynchronous RFC refer [Parallel Processing with Asynchronous RFC  |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/22/0425c6488911d189490000e829fbbd/content.htm]
    Hope this helps
    Abhinav

  • How do I call the subvi in parallel with main VI. Main vi should not wait for the subvi

    I have a subvi which takes the parameters like port name, transmit rate, message to transmit over serial port and Start/stop flag. This subvi calls VISA write vi in a loop continuously, till the Start/Stop flag is false, to write a message to serial port at a mentioned transmit rate. This subvi will be called from another VI. Actual intension is to transmit different messages to different ports continuously and stop them when required. In this senario, please provide solution for below points:
    1. How do I call the subvi in parallel with main VI. Main vi should not wait for the subvi.
    2. How does main vi can control already running subvi in parallel to it. In the above example I would like to start the subvi from main vi when start\stop flag is true and would like to stop it when the flag is false.
    3. How do I call the subVI with one set of parameters from main vi, when same subVI is running with other set of parameters already from main vi(subvi being called in a case with different set of parameters each time when the case is called). Means, how do I keep track of reentrant subvi (different calls to same vi)from the same main vi.

    Hi Dharani24,
    Try if these are helpful,
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/DB92C44E7D4D8A1B862577CB007D9C45
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvconcepts/asynchronous_vi_calls/
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvconcepts/reentrancy/
    Thanks
    uday,
    Please Mark the solution as accepted if your problem is solved and help author by clicking on kudoes
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer (CLAD) Using LV13

  • Text Entry not waiting for entry before continuing

    Captivate 4
    I'm trying to add a TEB where the user will need to enter the correct text before moving to the next slide.  I would like it to continue as soon as they user types the correct entry.  The problem is that the slide doesn't pause to wait for the entry - it continues to the next slide without anything being typed or a click.  ??
    I have the correct text listed in the 'Correct Entries' box and have it set to 'go to next slide' for 'On success'.  Under 'Options', I have it set to 'Validate User Input'.  I do not have any hint or caption buttons, and I am not showing a 'submit' button.
    Can someone tell me how to get it to pause the training to wait for the user to enter the correct text?
    Screen shots below.
    Thanks in advance,
    D

    Hi there
    Indeed there is!
    You enable the Button in the properties. This will place an associated button next to the field.
    What's that you are asking? You don't want a button?
    Well, nobody said you actually have to SEE the button! Just double-click the button and its properties will show. Choose Transparent Button and configure it so it's invisible. Then you configure the other "1" for the Button press!
    Cheers... Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    Captivate Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Adobe Certified Captivate Training
    SorcerStone Blog
    Captivate eBooks

  • Second tween does not wait for first to finish

    Having a little problem here and as far as I can tell it is
    just that the second tween starts before waiting for the first to
    finish. Basically on a click event it should slide out a scroll
    pane to the bottom of the screen, change the contentpath of the
    scroll pane, then slide it back up.
    with the code below it just slides up the new movie clip but
    does not slide out the old one, if i remove the code for the new
    clip to slide up the old one does do the slide out how I want it to
    look.
    how can I make a pause in between the two to wait.
    on (press) {
    import mx.transitions.Tween;
    import mx.transitions.easing.*;
    _root.mask._x = 54;
    _root.mask._y = 109.3;
    _root.scroll_pane.setMask(_root.mask);
    switch (_root.loaded_clip)
    case 2: var Slide_out:Tween = new Tween(_root.scroll_pane,
    "_y", Bounce.easeOut, _root.scroll_pane._y, 900, 3, true); break;
    _root.scroll_pane.contentPath = "Search_mc";
    var Slide_up:Tween = new Tween(_root.scroll_pane, "_y",
    Bounce.easeOut, 900, 109, 3, true);
    _root.loaded_clip = 1;
    }

    Its still not working with that code but I think I can muck
    around with it and figure it out, the slide out works on the old
    clip now but then the new one never shows up.
    The onMotionFinished was basically what I was looking for,
    think I can eventually figure it out from here, thanks for the
    info.

  • WaitFor() Does not wait for Process

    Experts,
    I have a Process p for a Microsoft Outlook Process OUTLOOK.EXE
    Now if there is an Email file (xyz.msg) opened as this process along with my MS Outlook running then,
    p.waitFor();
    // Where p = runner.exec(shell_command_to_open_msg_file);
    does not wait and move further.
    But if the MS Outlook is not running, then it waits till I manually close the Email msg file.
    How can I handle/overcome the former situation?
    Thanks in advance

    moondra_JavaDev wrote:
    How can I handle/overcome the former situation?
    You can't in java.
    What happens is that when outlook is already running then the new attempt to run does the following
    1. A application starts
    2. It determines that outlook is already running.
    3. It focuses that instance
    4. It exits.
    The last step is what you see. You do not have access to the one that is running because it isn't the same application.
    I would suggest examining the business requirements that are driving this. If you allow the user to already have outlook open then it seems rather odd that you are insisting that they exit it anyways. Instead you can pop a dialog and require that they tell you when they are done. Or don't use outlook and use java mail instead.

  • Wait for move complete not waiting for timeout

    Hi,
    I am running a small rotary stage with a 7358 motion controller. Occasionally when I command a new position, the "wait for move complete" seems to get triggered almost immediately even though the move is not complete. Since I have put in a "halt" downstream of this to cover the case where the move times out, the move stops immediately. The problems seems interrmittent but I haven't discovered a pattern yet except that is happens for more often when making a reverse move, i.e. I go to 1000 counts as a forward move and then back to 800 as a reverse.
    Has anyone seen something similar?
    Thanks,
    Dave
    David A. Taylor

    oops syntax error! I put waitComplete, but it's supposed to be moveComplete as the last argument for flex_wait_for_move_complete. Just want to let you guys know that. Thanks!

  • WORKFLOW PROCESS IS NOT WAITING FOR USER INPUT LIKE RE-ASSIGN FUNCTION

    I am using Stand alone Workflow 2.6, In my workflow process
    which is an Issue tracking system which is working fine. On Enhancement I would like to create my own RE-ASSIGN function which will, Change the ownership of an issue totally to other user.
    For this I Created a package(CHANGE_OWNER.CREATE)which will show list of Users and Comment field(Just like Re-Assign).
    Here user can pick other user, and add comment,
    once submit for that Item key I am updating the workflow notification table so that paritcular issue ownership will be changed.
    In my workflow process I created a lookup code called "Change Owner". On click of Change Owner it will call the Function
    in workflow process which will call CHANGE_OWNER.CREATE, here
    the workflow process supposed to wait and get the User to be
    changed. BUT THE PROCESS IS NOT WAITING, IT JUST DISPLAYED THE
    SCREEN AND CONTINUED THE WORKFLOW PROCESS. I WANT THE MY
    WORKFLOW PROCESS TO BE ACT AS RE-ASSINGN BUTTON WHICH WILL WAIT
    FOR THE USER INPUT.
    HOW TO DO IT.
    Thanks
    Bala.

    Hi Bala
    What enhancements were you adding to the Workflow Reassign/Delegate feature, which included being able to add comments? A good idea is to look for any differences between how workflow implements the reassign feature, and your customization.
    Also, make sure you only use the Public documented PL/SQL APIs and do not update the tables directly to ensure no Support or Upgrade Issues.
    Cheers
    Mark
    I am using Stand alone Workflow 2.6, In my workflow process
    which is an Issue tracking system which is working fine. On Enhancement I would like to create my own RE-ASSIGN function which will, Change the ownership of an issue totally to other user.
    For this I Created a package(CHANGE_OWNER.CREATE)which will show list of Users and Comment field(Just like Re-Assign).
    Here user can pick other user, and add comment,
    once submit for that Item key I am updating the workflow notification table so that paritcular issue ownership will be changed.
    In my workflow process I created a lookup code called "Change Owner". On click of Change Owner it will call the Function
    in workflow process which will call CHANGE_OWNER.CREATE, here
    the workflow process supposed to wait and get the User to be
    changed. BUT THE PROCESS IS NOT WAITING, IT JUST DISPLAYED THE
    SCREEN AND CONTINUED THE WORKFLOW PROCESS. I WANT THE MY
    WORKFLOW PROCESS TO BE ACT AS RE-ASSINGN BUTTON WHICH WILL WAIT
    FOR THE USER INPUT.
    HOW TO DO IT.
    Thanks
    Bala.

  • Thread not waiting for DOS process

    Hi
    In program I am using Threads. Here all threads will start and execute one DOS command. My problem is that all those thread needs to wait for DOS command to finish its process and then only thread should return.
    I have created ThreadGroup and added all threds. And I am checking it by using
    ThreadGroupVar.activeCount()!=0 so that I can come to know all thread processing is over or not.
    Threads are coming back to main process as soon as they start DOS command ..they are just not waiting it to be finish DOS job.
    Please guide me on this
    Regards,
    Niraj

    Create a collection of the Threads then iterate through it using join() on each one. When you have iterated though all the Threads they will all have completed.

  • Encrypted btrfs array, systemd not waiting for partitions [workaround]

    Hi,
    I have a non-root btrfs filesystem spannig over two encrypted partitions:
    /etc/crypttab:
    graid1 /dev/sdc3 /etc/crypto/graid1 timeout=15
    graid2 /dev/sdb2 /etc/crypto/graid2 timeout=15
    /etc/fstab:
    /dev/mapper/graid1 /mnt/raid btrfs defaults,device=/dev/mapper/graid1,device=/dev/mapper/graid2 0 0
    When booting I get
    A start job is running for dev-mapper-graid2.device (10s / no limit)
    Adding a nofail option to fstab makes the system bootable again but obviously the raid filesystem is not mounted. A mount -a in an interactive root shell mounts the filesystem just fine.
    My first guess was that systemd is ignorant to (among other things) the fact that all btrfs partitions must be present when mouning a btrfs array, not just the first one and it tries to "optimise" the boot process by starting the mount as soon as the first device is up via crypttab systemd automagick (systemd-crypto or whatever that unit parsing crypttab is called). Since debugging of systemd is black magick (no errors, warnings, fails or anything useful yielded from two-hour debugging using the wiki and extensive ddg'ing) I went the trial-and-error way.
    I found out that systemd somewhat "virtualises" the fstab to it's units, namely mount units, so I tried to gently hint it that it should really wait for the cryptsetup.target to finish so that all partitions are ready before it tries to mount the array:
    /etc/systemd/system/mnt-raid.mount:
    [Unit]
    Description=/mnt/raid
    Wants=cryptsetup.target
    After=cryptsetup.target
    AssertPathExists=/dev/mapper/graid1 // I was hoping these would force the unit to FAIL
    AssertPathExists=/dev/mapper/graid2 // in order for it to be at least a little debuggable. Guess what.
    [Mount]
    What=/dev/mapper/graid1
    Where=/mnt/raid
    Type=btrfs
    Options=defaults,relatime,compress=lzo,device=/dev/mapper/graid1,device=/dev/mapper/graid2
    Along with this unit I also commented out the line in fstab since it took precedence* every time even though the systemd documentation specifically says otherwise: If a mount point is configured in both /etc/fstab and a unit file that is stored below /usr, the former will take precedence. If the unit file is stored below /etc, it will take precedence. This means: native unit files take precedence over traditional configuration files, but this is superseded by the rule that configuration in /etc will always take precedence over configuration in /usr.
    *) I figured that much by trial-and-error approach, having the mount unit already present and listed in systemctl list-unit-files but removing the nofail option from fstab resulted in above mentioned "a start job is running" red line of death.
    After bootup systemctl list-units says:
    dev-mapper-graid1.device loaded inactive dead start dev-mapper-graid1.device
    mnt-raid.mount loaded inactive dead start /mnt/raid
    (these lines were not present when booting without the unit file).
    Since the unit did not "fail" and there are no logs in journalctl -u mnt-raid.mount and running SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug systemctl start mnt-raid.mount yields only unseful:
    Calling manager for StartUnit on mnt-raid.mount, replace
    Sent message type=method_call sender=n/a destination=org.freedesktop.systemd1 object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1 interface=org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager member=StartUnit cookie=1 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a
    Sent message type=method_call sender=n/a destination=org.freedesktop.systemd1 object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1 interface=org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager member=GetUnit cookie=2 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a
    Sent message type=method_call sender=n/a destination=org.freedesktop.systemd1 object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/mnt_2draid_2emount interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=Get cookie=3 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a
    Adding /org/freedesktop/systemd1/job/59 to the set
    Got message type=signal sender=n/a destination=n/a object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/job/59 interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=PropertiesChanged cookie=2 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a
    Got D-Bus request: org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.PropertiesChanged() on /org/freedesktop/systemd1/job/59
    Got message type=signal sender=n/a destination=n/a object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/job/58 interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=PropertiesChanged cookie=3 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a
    Got D-Bus request: org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.PropertiesChanged() on /org/freedesktop/systemd1/job/58
    ... and hangs indefinitely, I'm really running out of ideas. I did not find any information on how to debug a dead unit since it's apparently not considered an errorneous state.
    I'm stuck. I don't know what to do next except for making workarounds like manually mounting the filesystem via some kind of (now defunct - why?) /etc/rc.local mechanism. How do I find out what's happening when systemd starts the mount unit? How do I get the output from the commands it runs (like mount and possibly others)? I have no idea whether the custom mount unit of mine works and the problem is elsewhere or doesn't, or ... whatever.
    (off-topic: exactly how does systemd "optimise" anything? Ever since Arch moved to systemd my boot time tripled, all troubles got way more frustrating and 4 out of 5 of them were due to some systemd "goodie". What happened to KISS? systemd sure is Stupid but I kinda miss the Simple part...)
    Last edited by mr.MikyMaus (2015-04-01 13:22:11)

    Thanks! The Arch bug isn't directly related to my problem but the comment in systemd's bugreport was, well, "helpful", if you can call it that.
    UUID in fstab indeed works but I have only vague idea why and from Lennart's style of commentary I have a really bad feeling. Last time I had this feeling was a couple of years ago when I needed to solve a problem with Windows and contacted Microsoft support. They also used this language style and words like "this is intended, this is considered to be like this, you need to" and similar but no explanation why is it this way and why is it deviating from what is expected behaviour from user's point of view.

  • [Solved] systemd does not wait for the unit to finish

    My problem is described in the title. I have made a test by enabling the following unit:
    [Unit]
    Description=/etc/rc.local Compatibility
    [Service]
    Type=forking
    ExecStart=/bin/sleep 1000
    TimeoutSec=0
    RemainAfterExit=yes
    After=network.target
    [Install]
    WantedBy=multi-user.target
    The unit is well started (a process sleep 1000 exists). But with a type=forking, systemd is supposed to hang in this case. Instead, the graphical.target is launched, systemctl list-units mention it as dead, but the display manager is started before the sleep 1000 completes. Ho can I force systemd to wait?
    Last edited by olive (2015-03-16 16:49:34)

    olive, now you're making even less sense. I didn't say the sleep example was stupid and I didn't question your reasons for doing/wanting this.
    I suggested you add "Before=display-manager.service" and you respond "I added Before=graphical.target and it didn't change anything."
    I also tried to explain why systemd has no reason to delay the display-manager.service. You could have asked for further clarification, as berbae has now done. Let's try a longer explanation.
    Service startup
    Services can be started in different ways, as configured with Type=. This determines when a service is considered "started" (or when the service's start-up is considered finished). When a service reaches this state (some time after being started), units that are supposed to start After= this service will be started (and no sooner).
    With simple systemd has no further information about the start-up process. It launches whatever you specify in ExecStart and this is the main process that continues to run till the service stops. systemd assumes this type of service is started immediately. All the other types have some way for the process to indicate to systemd (either directly or indirectly) when it has finished starting.
    Actually oneshot is also a bit special and that is where RemainAfterExit comes in. For oneshot, systemd waits for the process to exit before it starts any follow-up units (and with multiple ExecStarts I assume it waits for all of them). So that automatically leads to the scheme in berbae's last post. However, with RemainAfterExit, the unit remains active even though the process has exited, so this makes it look more like "normal" service with
    begin of unit/startup ---- end of startup ------ end of unit
    This is the relevant behavior for this thread. First sleep starts, then after 1000 seconds, start-up finishes and follow-up units will be started. Then either the unit dies, or (with RemainAfterExit) it stays "active".
    The man page describes how "end of startup" is determined for each Type.
    Targets
    Targets are meant to group units together, to provide synchronization points (and replace runlevels). When you start a target, all its units will be started (in parallel if possible). The man page says:
    Unless DefaultDependencies= is set to false, target units will
           implicitly complement all configured dependencies of type Wants=,
           Requires=, RequiresOverridable= with dependencies of type After= if the
           units in question also have DefaultDependencies=true.
    This means that (by default) when a target is requested, all it units are started first. Only after all units have finished starting, the target itself will be started (and since the target doesn't do anything by itself, this startup is basically instantaneous). Without this dependency, the order between the target and its units is unspecified, so in theory the target could finish starting immediately while its units are still being started.
    Back to olive
    graphical.target has these DefaultDependencies, so it is not started until all its units (like display-manager.service) and other After= dependencies (like multi-user.target) have finished starting. Your sleep service has to be started before multi-user.target starts (again due to default target dependencies). So first display-manager and the sleep service are started and after 1000 seconds, the sleep service finishes starting and then (assuming all other dependencies were quicker) multi-user.target is started and graphical.target as well (assuming display-manager didn't need 1000 seconds).
    If you want display-manager.service after the sleep service, add a Before/After line to specify that (this was your original goal and my suggestion).
    olive wrote wrote:However, units that are parts of the graphical target are still launched before the graphical target become active. I am still unable to completely delay the starts of the graphical target before a specific unit completes.
    It should be clear now how this works. "units that are part of the graphical target" can only mean "units that are wanted/required by the graphical target" but that is basically all the units that are started when you boot your system, because multi-user.target is a part of graphical.target. And your sleep service is a part of multi-user.target, so in fact you're saying you want to delay starting the sleep service until the sleep service completes
    What you probably intended was to delay all units that are a part of graphical.target but not of multi-user.target until after the sleep service. I can't think of an easy (or even good) way to do this and this post is already too long, so I'll table that for now.

  • SCCM does not wait for Soft Reboot in deployments with dependencies

    This is a difficult thing to search for due to its granularity, so I apologize if this is a repeat topic.
    I am deploying an application with a dependency that returns the '3010' code to tell client to perform a Soft Reboot. The outcome I intended was for SCCM to install the dependency, wait for a reboot (as is the nature of the Soft Reboot to my knowledge) and
    then continue with the installation of the primary application after the user reboots.
    However, in practice this is not what SCCM does. Instead, it seems that the notice for a Soft Reboot is acknowledged by the client, noted by the expected popup the user sees as well as the 'restart required' message in Software Center, but the deployment
    process continues on in the background with the installation of the primary application being deployed. It almost seems like a bug, but maybe this is the intended behavior of SCCM 2012. I just can't find any documentation anywhere that speaks to this.

    I think this may have been a misunderstanding on my part about the specific definitions of "Hard Reboot" vs "Soft Reboot". I thought the former would immediately restart the computer, but perhaps it only halts other installations until a restart is performed
    by the user? And then a "Soft Reboot" basically would just act as a passive notification to the user that they should restart at some point, but the client itself would not actually take any action?
    It was just confusing to me that Software Center displayed the 'restart required' status yet continued with the next part of the deployment.
    To actually answer your question, I have not tried configuring the app deployment type to "Configuration Manager client will force a device restart" because to me that sounded like the client would immediately force a reboot regardless of the return code,
    but I only wanted the computer to reboot if the application installation returned the '3010' code (it can return others), and thus the default of "Determine behavior based on return codes" seemed the most appropriate option.

  • HumanTaskActivity not waiting for user to act

    Hi
    In PROC2 I have FlowN activity, from each branch I'm invoking another process called PROC3 by passing some email as input to PROC3.
    PROC3 contains only HumanTaskActivity.
    The moment I initiate my PROC2 , it invokes PROC3, but in PROC3 HumanTaskActivity doesnt wait for the response, it gets complete without sending any email.
    Any help would be very handful for me.
    Thanks
    Viki

    Hi Krish
    Thanks for your help.
    From my PROC2 I'm getting an user name (realm user), I want to pass this to another process PROC3.
    Way I did:
    Create partner link for PROC3 in PROC2
    assign user value to PROC3 input and pass that value to HumanTask.
    My Requirement is :
    In PROC2 I have a flowN activity, inside each branch I get the user value, at this stage I want to pass it to HumanTask.
    Any help will be very much helpful.
    Thanks
    Viki

  • Magic Mouse scrolling lacks "rolling feature" for fast finger swipe

    I recently purchased a Magic Mouse for my iMac (27" 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with Leopard 10.5.8 OS). I've noticed that the scrolling does not have one of the features shown in the System Profile settings for the mouse scrolling. When I move my finger quickly to scroll using a swiping motion (removing my finger from the mouse at the end of the motion), the scrolled content does not continue to roll on for a bit. Instead, it just stops. This is not a serious problem, but I would like to enjoy the full functionality as advertised by Apple. Anyone know what I should try to fix this? Thanks.

    Hi Marilyn:
    I dredged this up from my dim memory banks:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3925
    You are correct, that article indicates that the momentum feature is only available with OS X 10.6.
    If you have not done so, you might want to install this update (you probably already have it):
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL951
    Barry

Maybe you are looking for