HP Unix 64 bit oracle 9i 9.2.0.5.0 Proc Abort Core Dump

Hi,
I am trying small sample proc program on HP unix 64 bit machine. But with 9.2.0.5 it gives core dump
program:
====
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sqlca.h>
#include <oraca.h>
#define USERNAME "xx1"
#define PASSWORD "xx1"
char *username = USERNAME;
char *password = PASSWORD;
VARCHAR dynstmt[80];
VARCHAR ename[12];
int empno = 10;
main() {
EXEC SQL WHENEVER SQLERROR GOTO error;
EXEC SQL CONNECT :username IDENTIFIED BY :password;
puts("Connected\n");
exit(1);
error :
puts("\n not connected.\n");
Machine is
HP-UX xx B.11.11 U 9000/800 178484665 unlimited-user license
The program runs fine in oracle 9.0.1.4.0
But it gives core dump in oracle 9.2.0.5.0
GDB Trace is shown below,
====
#0 0x800003ffbf157390 in pthread_default_stacksize_np+0xe8 () from /usr/lib/pa20_64/libpthread.1
#1 0x800003ffbfe609c0 in Ldipme10+0x85daf0 ()
from /u01/apps/products/oracle/902/lib/libclntsh.sl.9.0
#2 0x800003ffbf9f1130 in Ldipme10+0x3ee260 ()
from /u01/apps/products/oracle/902/lib/libclntsh.sl.9.0
#3 0x800003ffbf9f48c8 in Ldipme10+0x3f19f8 ()
from /u01/apps/products/oracle/902/lib/libclntsh.sl.9.0
#4 0x800003ffbf9f5294 in Ldipme10+0x3f23c4 ()
from /u01/apps/products/oracle/902/lib/libclntsh.sl.9.0
=========
Can anyone help me out ? Have anyone faced this issue ?
Also, is there any patch needs to be updated for 9.2.0.5 ?
Regards,
Srinivasan S

Looks like metalink 435400.1
I suggest you open a call @ SAP and let them look on the system.
Markus

Similar Messages

SAP BI-BO Integration for "BO XI 3.1 on HP-Unix-PA-RISC-64 bit"+Oracle WAS

Hi,
We have set up SAP Integration Kit to integrate SAP BI 7.0 and BO XI
3.1. Our BO system is set up on Unix HP-UX-PA-RISC 64 BIT and Oracle Web Application Server
10.1.3.
When we are creating a WebI report using WebI Rich Client, we are able
to fetch the data from SAP BI Query and also refresh the data using
WebI Rich Client (Desktop).
When we are creating a WebI report from Infoview, we are able to create
the WebI report,but we get the database error "Unable to Bind to
NetworkLayer Object"
(WIS 10901)" when trying to Run the Query i.e.
fetch the data from SAP BI Query. Same error is also there when we try
to refresh the data from Infoview for a WebI report created using WebI
Rich Client (Desktop).
We raised an OSS Message with SAP. We got a response that :
====================================================================
The reason you're having this problem seems to be because you don't have the SAP dataAccess library (libdbd_sap.so) and its equivalent config files (sap folder).
Those are the files that manage the connection from BOE queries to SAP.
You can check that they exist in your Windows client fine(.dll).
Here's what I have in my HP-UX system:
$ ls -l sap
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 4671488 Sep 13 2008 libdbd_sap.so
sap:
total 80
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 4650 Sep 13 2008 sapen.cod
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 358 Sep 13 2008 sap.prm
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 10670 Sep 13 2008 sap.rss
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 1343 Sep 13 2008 sap.sbo
These drivers are not installed with the SAP Kit but with the BOE setup
itself - meaning you can have a system without SAP Kit but with these drivers.
On the other hand, with SAP Kit, you can have other features such as your working SAP authentication fine but not this one since it comes with BOE.
====================================================================
Request the SDN Community to check the below mentioned :
Platform : HP-UX-PA-RISC 64 bit
Oracle WAS (instead of Tomcat).
1) Which installer was used to install BOE XI 3.1 ?
2) Is the BOE XI 3.1 base installer available for HP-UX-PA-RISC-64 bit ? I could not find one at SAP Service Market place (the nearest one is for HPP - 32 Bit)
3) Do you have the relevant SAP Folder & Drivers on this path, as per the above SAP OSS Message.
4) Any inputs on how to resolve the issue (we have so-far tried with 4 different installers for HP-UX-PA-RISC and not got any success)
regards,
Rajesh K Sarin

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
(A) We have attempted with BOE and SAP Integration Kit in the sequence. My earlier communication has all the attachments for the steps followed, and the SAP message.
(B) We have HP-UX-PA-RISC-64 bit. Request to please point us to the correct installer on this link
(C) We have done 4 complete trials :
1) BOE XI 3.0 Installer provided by BO Consultant, 6 months back & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.0 --> Upgrade to BOE XI 3.1 --> BOE FP 1.2 for XI 3.1 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.1 --> Integration Kit FP 1.2 --> Oracle WAS Manual deployment steps
2) BOE XI 3.0 Installer & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.0 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.0 --> Oracle WAS manual deployment steps
3) BOE XI 3.1 Installer for HP-UX-PA-RISC-32bit (HPP) & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.1 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.1 --> Oracle WAS manual deployment steps
4) BOE XI 3.1 Installer provided by SAP OSS Support & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.1 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.1 --> Oracle WAS manual deployment steps
None of these steps have helped us.
SAP OSS Support asked us to check availability of the "SAP Folder" and "Lib / driver" files on the Connection Server Directory; which would appear once BOE XI 3.1 installer is installed (ONLY BASE Install, SAP Integration Kit is not needed).
We have also confirmed this with one another Client / Project. They have HP-UX-Itanium-64 bit and BOE-XI 3.1 only base install (No SAP Integration kit). This particular SAP Folder / Drivers are available without any SAP Integration kit.
Request to correct me, if I am wrong :
SAP Integration kit additionally provides the drivers needed for Crystal & SAP Authentication.
regards,
Rajesh K Sarin

Poor performance and increase CPU on UNIX 64 bit

Hi
I have moved one of my 300GB test databases from a 4GB RAM 2x DUAL zeon 3GHz processors LINUX machine to a UNIX 64 bit 6GB RAM 2x1GHz USIIIi processor machine. Both have the oracle data stored on RAID 5 disk.
Both Oracle versions are the same. The data was transered via export/import.
Running exactly the same queries the UNIX box is up to 3 times slower and sits at 100% CPU, wheras LINUX machine sits between 30-50% CPU and performance is really good. No other users are accessing the machines.
Statspack reports look very similar, both have 100%/near 100% instance efficiency. top wait events on both machines are control file parallel write and db file sequential read, but even the values for these do not look worrying. The only difference is there is more memory allocated to the SGA of the UNIX server.
Any ideas as to why the UNIX 64bit server is slower and using 100%CPU would be greatly received.
Thanks

LINUX
SELECT
count(*)
FROM
mastermap.topographicline
WHERE
descriptivegroup like :"SYS_B_00"
and
descriptiveterm like :"SYS_B_01"
and
physicalpresence = :"SYS_B_02"
AND
sdo_filter(geom, mdsys.sdo_geometry(:"SYS_B_03", :"SYS_B_04", null,
mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array (:"SYS_B_05", :"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07"),
mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array (:"SYS_B_08", :"SYS_B_09", :"SYS_B_10",:"SYS_B_11")), :"SYS_B_12")=:"SYS_B_13"
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 2 0 0
Execute 1 0.01 0.01 0 11 2 0
Fetch 2 0.20 0.18 0 10713 0 1
total 4 0.21 0.19 0 10726 2 1
UNIX
SELECT
count(*)
FROM
mastermap.topographicline
WHERE
descriptivegroup like :"SYS_B_00"
and
descriptiveterm like :"SYS_B_01"
and
physicalpresence = :"SYS_B_02"
AND
sdo_filter(geom, mdsys.sdo_geometry(:"SYS_B_03", :"SYS_B_04", null,
mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array (:"SYS_B_05", :"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07"),
mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array (:"SYS_B_08", :"SYS_B_09", :"SYS_B_10",:"SYS_B_11")), :"SYS_B_12")=:"SYS_B_13"
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.03 0.02 0 42 2 0
Fetch 2 0.24 0.34 0 10707 0 1
total 4 0.27 0.36 0 10749 2 1
The elapsed time is twice as slow on unix, and it seems to be a fetch issue. Any ideas?

64-bit vs 32-bit Oracle on Win2003

Background:
Ive been tasked to come up with the appropriate hardware/software solution for my company, an MMOLG (Massively Multiple On-Line Gaming) enterprise as it gets ramped up for two huge game releases. We use My SQL (4.x) for managing the Web Front-end, MS SQL 2000 Servers to manage the games, and Oracle to manage the billing application on the back-end. The billing application is also used for authentication (registration of new subscribers, credit card validations) and authorization (what games each subscriber can play, is their account up to date, etc.). We currently support our billing application using 32-bit Oracle (9.2.0.4) on 32-bit, clustered Win2k, using Failsafe (3.3.2) on MSCS (1.0). We have the first new game-to-be-released in Beta, and, to date, I have a similar setup except that the Oracle is 9.2.0.6, Failsafe is 3.3.3, and MSCS is 1.1. Originally, I was given to understand that each of the two new games were to be on separate Oracle instances, but now my management wants both games to be run from the same instance. Our Marketing team spit out the anticipated subscriber/subscription #s recently, and the size of the #s has given me pause I question whether or not our current system will be able to handle the # of logins (for authorization and authentication) during the so-called land-rush (the games 1st week/month of release) and that period of time immediately following an upgrade to the game (where huge #s of gamers rush to get back to playing). I also need to consider the peak # of logins during the heaviest play period times. The minimum # of gamer logins/hour I need to account for is 5-7k/hour, and the high end could be upwards of 30-45k/hour (for both games, post-upgrade case). To me, that number of logins/hour is asking a lot Windows 32-bit, perhaps the impossible.
What Ive done to date:
First I made sure that I understood what I can do with Windows, and then implemented a base test on the Beta environment by setting up Windows for VLM management. I have both the /PAE and /3GB switches enabled (I have 8GB of RAM, so the /3GB switch gets me the extra 1GB memory for shared_pool w/o being the hindrance it would be if I was using 16GB+), and I have the AWE tailored to 768MB (the minimum that, via trial and error, that I could bring Oracle up under). This has allowed me to have a shared_pool of 320MB, a java_pool and large_pool of 152MB (more on the large_pool later). To date, Ive sized the buffer_cache at 5000MB (just to prove that I could do it, and see the results). So SGA is 5362MB. Ive set the Aggregate PGA Target to 256MB.
Ive looked at 64-bit Oracle on 64-bit Win2003. 64-bit Oracle 9.2.0.7 is certified on Win2003 (Itanium only, no certification yet for the really spiffy EM64T chip set). If dedicated will not cut it for the max login load, I could consider Shared mode, knowing that I get some performance hit. Going to 64-bit Theres some test data out there (Larry Pedigo, of Performance Tuning Corp. had a nice white paper), but Ive found little else. This seems, at first blush, the best choice for a Windows shop, but who knows? Ive come across one gotcha to date, the Failsafe Manager is only 32-bit (while Failsafe is 64-bit, why Oracle did that, I do not know), so has to be installed on a separate home, on a separate 32-bit Windows machine. Ive gotten it from Oracle Support that 32-bit Oracle Client will connect w/o issue to the 64-bit Oracle server, so having the various 32-bit applications used (on separate 32-bit Win2k machines) connect to the database is not a problem.
Ive looked at putting 32-bit Oracle on a 64-bit Win2003, so if the initial load/stress tests fails (at 5-7k logins/hour) I could easily migrate Oracle to the 64-bit. From what Ive read, I would expect the 32-bit Oracle to be way too slow.
Ive looked at going to RAC as it would buy me twice the memory for the pools.
Im just starting to look at moving to Oracle on UNIX. I have yet to estimate the total cost for doing so (early guess-timate is $750k), and Id have to bring a Unix Sys Admin on-board. Up to now, Turbine has been 90% Windows, 10% Linux.
Questions for the group:
Has anyone out there had this problem to tackle?
Am I correct in thinking that Windows 32-bit would be swamped by the anticipated load?
Is anyone running 64-bit Oracle on 64-bit Win2003? If so, did you get what you expected with respect to performance? Any obstacles that you had to overcome?
Has anyone suggestions as to configuration/environment that would help me?
Any responses would be a God-send to this poor, beleaguered DBA. Thanks very much (in advance).

Wow, you have a big task at hand, and it looks very fun to build.
I say you should consider 10g r2, as it will soon (or maybe already released) run on the AMD Opteron and the EM64T now that windows 2003 is set up for these processors.
If you are not ready to go 10g, then I would seriously consider RAC for the 9i database.
and I wouldn't install 32 bit on 64bit machine. Its not supported and would give you less than desirable results
Message was edited by:
acrlewis

Moving a 32 bit Oracle 9i database to 64 bit on a different server

Hello,
We have a 24 GB database with Oracle 9.2.0.7 (32 bit). As the hardware of this server is getting obsolete, it is planned to move this instance to another server, which has 64 bit Oracle software of same version (9.2.0.7). In this scenario what is the best way to move the instance?
Is it only the full export from 32 bit server and import into 64 bit server(after creating the instance there)?
Since this is a 24 GB database, and target server is 8 gb of ram, any pointers on how long the import process can take?
There is a documentation to change word size, I can run utlirp.sql as suggested here:
http://www.orafaq.com/forum/?t=rview&goto=258668#msg_258668
But I have some doubts as I mentioned in that post. Can you please share your suggestions?
Thanks,
Nirav

Hi
Is there some document or steps to follow when creating the instance on the new server The database move is easy, and here is one way to move the schema, fast:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/oracle_tips_db_copy.htm
And then, you just run the script to change the wordsize for 64-bit:
Also, after your migration, watch out for common performance issues:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_bad_poor_performance_upgrade_migration_32_64_bit.htm
Also, note that Oracle has changed the optimizer costing model from "IO" to CPU" in 10g, and shops that combine an upgrade to 64-bit servers with a 10g migration may want to look at changing the new default for _optimizer_cost_model.
Going 64-bit means that you can now allocate very large RAM data buffers and increase your shared_pool_size above two gigabytes. However, it is important to remember that there are downsides to having a super-large db_cache_size. While direct access to data is done with hashing, there are times when the database must examine all of the blocks in the RAM cache. These types of database may not always benefit from an upgrade to a 64 bit server:
Systems with high Invalidations: Whenever a program issues a truncated table, uses temporary tables, or runs a large data purge, Oracle must sweep all of the blocks in the db_cache_size to remove dirty blocks. This can cause excessive overhead for system with a db_cache_size greater than 10 gigabytes.
High Update Systems: The database writer (DBWR) process must sweep all of the blocks in db_cache_size when performing an asynchronous write. Having a huge db_cache_size can cause excessive work for the database writer. Some shops dedicate a separate, smaller data buffer (of a different blocksize) for high-update objects.
RAC systems: Oracle RAC and Grid does not perform optimally with super-large data buffer RAM, as available in 64-bit systems. You may experience high cross-instance calls when using a large db_cache_size in multiple RAC instances. This inter-instance "pinging" can cause excessive overhead, and that is why RAC DBA's try to segregate RAC instances to access specific areas of the database. This is why Oracle 10g grid server blades generally contain only 4-gig RAM.
Hope this helps. . .
Don Burleson
Oracle Press author
Author of “Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference”
http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm

32 bit Oracle database 10g to 64 bit Oracle Database 11g on Windows 2008

Hi everybody,
I'm going to move and upgrade my 32 bit Oracle database server 10g to another 64 bit windows 2008 server.
New database server will be 64 bit Oracle database server 11g.
Somebody told me export import doesn't carry archieve logs therefore is there any way to move and upgrade the database without any lost?
Thanks for your help

I'm going to move and upgrade my 32 bit Oracle database server 10g to another 64 bit windows 2008 server.
New database server will be 64 bit Oracle database server 11g.
Somebody told me export import doesn't carry archieve logs therefore is there any way to move and upgrade the database without any lost?Yes, in export/import, you will create a new database and import. The question is why you want to prefer export/import?
is it source database 32bit is in different OS platform? If not directly after installation you can upgrade the database. using DBUA

Companion CDs for 64-bit Oracle HTTP Server for AIX5L(64 bit) required.

I need Companion CDs for 64 bit Oracle HTTP Server for AIX5L(64 bit).
I tried to install using
as_ibm_aix_companion_101300_disk1.cpio & as_ibm_aix_companion_101300_disk2.cpio
but when i checked the files present in <Oracle_Home>/ohs/lib , they are of 32-bit.
Also i tried with Oracle 10.1.2.0.2 but still the server is installed as 32-bit.
Is 64-bit Oracle HTTP Server supported on AIX5L(64 bit) ?
If yes, then from where can i download the CDs?
Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Greetings,
Try this link:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/htdocs/10201aixsoft.html
Regards,
Bill Chadbourne

Installing 32 bit oracle on 64 bit windows 7

My oracle application works only with 32 bit oracle.Now I need to install the application on a 64 bit windows 7.I tried installing oracle 11g 32 bit database on this machine(64 bit windows 7).During the final stages,it gave an error that the listener service has not started.When I checked the Services status in Computer Management->Services,I found that the listener has already started.I closed the error message and continued with installation.The installation completed successfully.But when I login to sql plus with my oracle database(SYSTEM/SYSTEM@MYHOSTNAME),it is giving tns error ORA 12541-TNS NO LISTENER.I tried every possible ways like restarting the service, and deleting the listener and creating it again,but still it doesnt work.
If anyone has faced the same problem,please give me solution.
I cannot try installing 64 bit oracle because my application is not compatible with 64 bit oracle.
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:22 AM
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:23 AM

1001322 wrote:
My oracle application works only with 32 bit oracle.Now I need to install the application on a 64 bit windows 7.I tried installing oracle 11g 32 bit database on this machine(64 bit windows 7).During the final stages,it gave an error that the listener service has not started.When I checked the Services status in Computer Management->Services,I found that the listener has already started.I closed the error message and continued with installation.The installation completed successfully.But when I login to sql plus with my oracle database(SYSTEM/SYSTEM@MYHOSTNAME),it is giving tns error ORA 12541-TNS NO LISTENER.I tried every possible ways like restarting the service, and deleting the listener and creating it again,but still it doesnt work.
If anyone has faced the same problem,please give me solution.
I cannot try installing 64 bit oracle because my application is not compatible with 64 bit oracle.
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:22 AM
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:23 AMIn addition to the other comments, you need to make the distinction between the oracle database and the oracle client.
the application interacts directly with the oracle client software. The application should not know or care about the word length of the database.

Unable to install 64-bit Oracle ODBC Instant Client on Windows 2008 R2 machine.

I am trying to upgrade the Oracle ODBC driver from the 32-bit version currently installed (ODBC Instant Client Release 10.1.0.5.0, April 2006) to a newer 64-bit version but have not been successful. I have had success at uninstalling and reinstalling the existing 32-bit version package (release 10.1.0.5.0) however when I've tried to install the 64-bit ODBC Instant Client (Release 12.1, December 2012), I run the odbc_install.exe application inside the package. it appears to run without issue/compliant, but then I do not see the 64-bit Oracle ODBC driver anywhere, either if I go via the traditional Administrator Tools --> ODBC Data Sources or if I go to the c:\windows\syswow64\odbcad32.exe route. Further investigation into the ReadMe file (ODBC_IC_Readme_Win.html) reveals that you need the 3 DLLs oci.dll, oraociei11.dll and orannzsbb11.dll which the package does not come with. Where could I obtain the correct version of these DLLs or else where can I get an installation package which already contains them?
Any help with this is greatly appreciated. Thank you

Welcome to the forums !
Pl post this in the Instant Client forum - Instant Client
HTH
Srini

Install 32-bit Oracle on a 64-bit OS

Hi,
for some reason,i have to install 32-bit oracle on a SUN X4450.As you know ,it's X86 and OS on it is solaris 10 for soalris X86. Both the CPU and OS are 64-bit.
All i want to know is that if there are some limits on server's RAM,such as RAM can't over 16GB

Hi,
All i want to know is that if there are some limits on server's RAM,such as RAM can't over 16GBSun server X4450 supports RAM upto 256 Gb
See the below link:
http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4450/specs.xml
Regards,
Xaheer

Is there a 32-bit Oracle 9i Release 2

We have a 32 bit HP UX 11.0 server we would like to set up as a development and test server for Oracle 9i. Is there a 32-bit Oracle 9i Release 2 ? The only one I can see in downloads if for HPUX 64 bit.

Wrong forum.
Only solution I can think to actually get to the view.
1. SQL Server, in TSQL, alllows access to ODBC driver
2. Use a ODBC driver that can access Oracle (which probably means any SQL driver that will install.)

Access a view on a 32 bit Oracle 9i from a MS SQL 2008 R2 64 bit

NOt sure if this is the right forum for this.
We need to access a view on a 32 bit Oracle 9i - Release 9.2.0.8.0 database running on Windows 2003 Server, from a MS SQL 2008 R2 64 bit system running on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
Edited by: 854859 on Apr 26, 2011 3:21 PM

When yu want to access a view hosted in Oracle and retrieve data from this view in a MS SQl Server, then you need to use MS SQL Server Linked Server mechanism based on OLEDB/ODBC.
Since MS SQL Server this feature is integrated in MS Integration Services and more details can be found at the MS knowledge base.

We need to access a view on a 32 bit Oracle 9i - Release 9.2.0.8.0 databas

Hi
I don't know if this is the correct forum:
We need to access a view on a 32 bit Oracle 9i - Release 9.2.0.8.0 database running on Windows 2003 Server, from a MS SQL 2008 R2 64 bit system running on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
The DBA for one of the vendors involved has concluded that it is not possible to link from 64 bit MS SQL to a 32 bit Oracle install.
If it is possible, can you advice what we need to do. Thank you.

Wrong forum.
Only solution I can think to actually get to the view.
1. SQL Server, in TSQL, alllows access to ODBC driver
2. Use a ODBC driver that can access Oracle (which probably means any SQL driver that will install.)

32 bit oracle in 64 bit OS and issues

Hi All,
Good morning, I installed windows 7 (64 bit) and installed oracle 10g 10.2.0.1.0 version. previously when I was used vista the ojdbc14.jar driver worked fine and able to access the DB using this driver. now I am getting the below error as:
=====
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: D:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server\BIN\ocijdbc10.dll: Can't load IA 32-bit .dll on a AMD 64-bit platform
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection$1.run(T2CConnection.java:3139)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection.loadNativeLibrary(T2CConnection.java:3135)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection.logon(T2CConnection.java:221)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.PhysicalConnection.<init>(PhysicalConnection.java:439)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection.<init>(T2CConnection.java:132)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CDriverExtension.getConnection(T2CDriverExtension.java:78)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:801)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(Unknown Source)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(Unknown Source)
at DBPrime.main(DBPrime.java:14)
=====
Please guide me to avoid this issue. What driver I have to use to get rid of this or am I use another version like 64 bit oracle for this.
Bhargava S Akula.

absriram wrote:
Actually I am facing this issue due to 64 bit. its not OS specific.Do you mean you had this working on 32 bit Windows 7?
many of the production support systems are running on 64 bit processors.My point was not related to 32 bit or 64 bit but running Oracle software on an unsupported platform.

64 bit oracle client VS 32 bit oracle database

if I have 64 bit oracle client installed in a windows host.., can I connect to a 32 bit oracle database?
I thnk yes, right?
thank you

Just curious - How difficult would it be for you to check?

HP Unix 64 bit oracle 9i 9.2.0.5.0 Proc Abort Core Dump

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for