HR-PA. Issue when hire in future period. Transaction PA48.

Hi, Guru! May be somebody help me.
When i hire candidate from transaction PA48 on hire > sy-
datum, object BP not created for new object CP, because in
the function module 'RH_ALEOX_INTG_CP_FILL_CONT
in the line 102
'perform sync_cp_collect_objects' work not correct.
data select only sy-datum
loop at it_hrdbtab assigning <ls_hrdbtab>
where otype = gc_cpers and
istat = '1' and
opera ne 'D' and
begda le sy-datum and
endda ge sy-datum.
move-corresponding <ls_hrdbtab> to ls_person.
append ls_person to ct_persons.
endloop.

check this link might be helpful
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/45/8150635e9c40c1e10000000a1553f7/content.htm

Similar Messages

  • Settlement Posted to future period

    Hi All,
    User has execute the settlement in CJ88 to an asset by giving future period 12/2010. Value of settlement was Zero and no accounting document got generated. Only CO and Asset line items with Zero values.
    Now when he tries to reverse the settlement it is giving error
    "Reversal cannot be posted (system error)
    Procedure
    When you reverse a posting that originated during the transfer of balances during the asset data transfer, use transaction OASV (FI-AA Customizing "Transfer balances"). Manually create a reverse posting (with reversed positive/negative signs) for each line item in the document you want to reverse. If it is no longer possible to use transaction OASV, use transaction ABF1"
    There is no asset document generated and we can reverse as above.
    It is not allowing to settle for 01/2010, as it says perform settlement after 12/2010.
    Please let me know how this issue can be resolved.
    Thanks
    Satish

    Hi,
    For new asset the Capitalization date is not updated in the Asset Master and for old asset the date is previous settlement date.
    Thanks
    Satish

  • Depreciation error - Unplanned posting run allow for future period

    Dear ,
    Need urgent advice for depreciation error happen in our production system.
    FYI, our fiscal year variant 2013 = Feb 2012 - Jan 2013 ( We are now at month-end close for Pr 1 2013 ).And fiscal year close 2012 AJAB and Carry forward ARJW have successfully run for new FY 2013.
    In short, in our asset accounting user was accidentally run unplannned depreciation for future period 12/2013 of one particular asset, while we are now in Pr 1/2013. And, Pr12/2013 is open for asset posting.However, no FI posting posted into the system.
    Just a curiosity as to why system allow user to run unplanned depreciation for future posting without giving an error message to follow the posting cycle.
    The impact/error of above unplanned depreciation run:
    User is not allowed to execute AFAB depreciation run for Pr 1/2013. Even worst, in the AFAB program shows from Pr 1/2013 - 12/2013 is already posted when we do depreciation test run. We can't perform any planned,repeat,restart  for Pr1/2013.
    Because of only one asset had accidentally run for Pr12/2013, all of our asset (96,773 asset) cannot proceed with depreciation run for Pr 1/2013 in the new fiscal year.
    This is high priority as it will impact the entire depreciation run for 12 month of our company.
    Your early reply on this issue is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Latifah

    Thank you for the response.
    FYI, the asset posting actually has been executed but no document was posted as there's no value.
    I've check the 2 tables below:
    ANLC - No numbers of run for any period in FY2013
    ANLP - No depreciation run was posted in FY13 (all periods).
    Is there anyway for us to do normal planned run for Pr 1/2013? As i understand SAP has no function to perform reversal depreciation run in AFAB. How
    With regard to the posting period 12/2013 that is open for user, I already highlighted this to the respective custodian.
    Thanks.

  • Posting run for future period requested (check entry)

    Hi,
    While taking depreciation run for company code in AFAB system is generating the error message "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" SAP error AA697
    I checked in OB52 postings periods are open for 2009(all periods)
    SAP note 1150235 (all corrections) and 1153718 are completely implemented.
    Still the problem is not resolved.
    Regards,
    Sankar

    Hi Sankar,
    I would like to refer you to the already implemented note 1153718 which states :
    After you implement the changes, the system issues error message AA 697      
    "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" immediately when     
    you use a fiscal year that is in the future.  In principle, you can          
    customize this message. However, in this case, no settings are taken         
    into account; the system always issues an error message.                     
    Regards Bernhard

  • Planned Orders Are Being Created In The Future Period (About Six Months onw

    Dear All,
    We are facing a problem that when we execute the product heuristics for a particular location - item, planned orders are not getting generated as per the demand element in the current period but they are getting generated in future period say six months from now... We could NOT understand that Why the system is pushing the orders in future period. We have checked the following parameters :
    Calendar is active for  the period upto DEC"2012.
    Time Streams have been genereted for the particular resource.
    Resource(s) do exist in Live Cache.
    Sufficient capapcity is available in the current period (as viewed from the resource planning table).
    Please advise that what other parameters should be checked in order to get the planned orders in current period. In this regard, we shall like to confirm that we are facing this issue since last 8 - 10 days, earlier, there was NOT such an issue.
    With Best Regards,
    Sanjeev Chugh
    06-JAN-2012

    Hi Sanjeev,
    Did you maintain any value for planning time fence, and if yes, how big is it? This could be one possible reason why system is not able to plan the orders (also depends on what Heuristics you are using).
    In RRP3, double click on your planned orders and check out the start date and the end date. Is your start date also lying in the future, or is it that due to long time in your operations (somehow your PDS/PPMs got messed up?), orders availability got pushed to the future.
    I am not an expert in PPDS, but I can only think of different lead times coming into picture which could possibly push your planned orders availability to the future.
    See if this helps.
    Thanks - Pawan

  • Performance issues when creating a Report / Query in Discoverer

    Hi forum,
    Hope you are can help, it involves a performance issues when creating a Report / Query.
    I have a Discoverer Report that currently takes less than 5 seconds to run. After I add a condition to bring back Batch Status that = ‘Posted’ we cancelled the query after reaching 20 minutes as this is way too long. If I remove the condition the query time goes back to less than 5 seconds.
    Please see attached the SQL Inspector Plan:
    Before Condition
    SELECT STATEMENT
    SORT GROUP BY
    VIEW SYS
    SORT GROUP BY
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
    AND-EQUAL
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N2
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_N1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
    After Condition
    SELECT STATEMENT
    SORT GROUP BY
    VIEW SYS
    SORT GROUP BY
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    TABLE ACCESS FULL GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_N1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    Is there anything i can do in Discoverer Desktop / Administration to avoid this problem.
    Many thanks,
    Lance

    Hi Rod,
    I've tried the condition (Batch Status||'' = 'Posted') as you suggested, but the qeury time is still over 20 mins. To test i changed it to (Batch Status||'' = 'Unposted') and the query was returned within seconds again.
    I’ve been doing some more digging and have found the database view that is linked to the Journal Batches folder. See below.
    I think the problem is with the column using DECODE. When querying the column in TOAD the value of ‘P’ is returned. But in discoverer the condition is done on the value ‘Posted’. I’m not too sure how DECODE works, but think this could be the causing some sort of issue with Full Table Scans. How do we get around this?
    Lance
    DECODE( JOURNAL_BATCH1.STATUS,
    '+', 'Unable to validate or create CTA',
    '+*', 'Was unable to validate or create CTA',
    '-','Invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
    '-*', 'Modified invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
    '<', 'Showing sequence assignment failure',
    '<*', 'Was showing sequence assignment failure',
    '>', 'Showing cutoff rule violation',
    '>*', 'Was showing cutoff rule violation',
    'A', 'Journal batch failed funds reservation',
    'A*', 'Journal batch previously failed funds reservation',
    'AU', 'Showing batch with unopened period',
    'B', 'Showing batch control total violation',
    'B*', 'Was showing batch control total violation',
    'BF', 'Showing batch with frozen or inactive budget',
    'BU', 'Showing batch with unopened budget year',
    'C', 'Showing unopened reporting period',
    'C*', 'Was showing unopened reporting period',
    'D', 'Selected for posting to an unopened period',
    'D*', 'Was selected for posting to an unopened period',
    'E', 'Showing no journal entries for this batch',
    'E*', 'Was showing no journal entries for this batch',
    'EU', 'Showing batch with unopened encumbrance year',
    'F', 'Showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
    'F*', 'Was showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
    'G', 'Showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
    'G*', 'Was showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
    'H', 'Showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
    'H*', 'Was showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
    'I', 'In the process of being posted',
    'J', 'Showing journal control total violation',
    'J*', 'Was showing journal control total violation',
    'K', 'Showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
    'K*', 'Was showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
    'L', 'Showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
    'L*', 'Was showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
    'M', 'Showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
    'M*', 'Was showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
    'N', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
    'N*', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
    'O', 'Unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
    'O*', 'Was unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
    'P', 'Posted',
    'Q', 'Showing untaxed journal entry',
    'Q*', 'Was showing untaxed journal entry',
    'R', 'Showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
    'R*', 'Was showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
    'S', 'Already selected for posting',
    'T', 'Showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
    'T*', 'Was showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
    'U', 'Unposted',
    'V', 'Journal batch is unapproved',
    'V*', 'Journal batch was unapproved',
    'W', 'Showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
    'W*', 'Was showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
    'X', 'Showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
    'X*', 'Was showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
    'Z', 'Showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines',
    'Z*', 'Was showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines', NULL ),

  • Printing issues when printing to Server 2008 R2 Print Server

    We have a problem with netwok printing that encompasses many different areas and versions of Windows OSes so I will be posting this in a few different places.
    Let me lay this out for you. We have a single Server 2008 R2 print server with 300 printers of various models. This print server has both 32 and 64-bit drivers installed for every printer. For the HP printers we are using the HP Universal Printing PCL 6
    (version 61.94.3.37) and for the Ricoh printers we are using their PCL6 driver for universal printing version 3.5. All drivers run in Isolation mode and no printer gets published to AD.
    We have a mix of Windows clients printing to these printers, both XP Pro and Windows 7 32 and 64-bit.
    Now for the problems: The other day one Isolation host on the server went crazy, processing was hitting 100% and memory was fluctuating and growing a lot. After investigating a little that isolation host was having issues accessing the Ricoh Driver (which
    was 3.4 at the time). In an attempt to resolve the issue we updated the driver to V. 3.5. This seemed to fix the isolation issues and things calmed down however this is the beginning of many other issues for the clients. Both Windows OS versions (XP and 7)
    don't seem to be either downloading and installing the updated driver and/or doing so correctly. Clients are now experiencing extremely slow printing, applications such as Word, Outlook, Excel and others open slowly and it can take 2-3 minutes for print dialog
    boxes to open. In all cases it seems that we have to have a tech delete the printer(s), delete the driver and then re-install the printer to make things better but for some reason, which is really unknown, this process doesn't work for every machine and on
    some we can't even remove the old drivers at all without booting into SafeMode and doing it that way.
    With all of that said, are there any suggestions as to why the clients aren't downloading and installing the drivers from the server correctly? How to avoid these issues when we need to upgrade the drivers on the server in the future? Most importantly right
    now, are there any recommendations or scripts on how to force the deletions of the printer, driver, reset the print spoolers and then re-add the printers in a more automated fashion?
    I have played with both wmic, pnputil and printuidll and am trying to put something together but without a set solution that will work consistently it becomes a lot more difficult.

    We are experiencing a very similar issue.
    Windows Server 2008 R2. Printers are deployed over group policy.
    Clients range from Windows 7 to Windows 8. Citrix XenDesktop and XenApp environment also connects to these endpoints.
    We have A wide assortment of HP printers, and Ricoh Printers.
    For the ricoh's we have been historically using the PCL6 drivers for the individual device type (not universal print). Up till recently, it all was working fine, until about some time in the middle of june, when everything just seemed to go crazy.
    The issue was resolved by moving off from the PCL 6 drivers and using the PCL5e driver counterparts on all of our ricoh printers.
    It would crash XenDesktop applications, it would crash office applications.
    The print spooler would lock up, even if the ricoh printers were not actually used, just as long as they were loaded.
    Even after loading PCL5 on the servers, some of the clients would simply not download the PCL5 version of the driver from the print server. In order to resolve this, I have created the steps below. Be advised, this may possibly cause damage on your system.
    We just found it worked great for us. Local printers will likely have to be manually reinstalled after this.
    Directions
    Stop the print spooler
    Open C:\Windows\System32\Spool and delete the following
    All files in SERVERS
    All files in PRINTERS
    All files in drivers
    All files in prtprocs
    Start the print spooler
    Open a command prompt as administrator, and run the following command
    Cscript C:\windows\system32\Printing_Admin_Scripts\en-US\prndrvr.vbs -x
    This should further delete all print drivers.
    Open a command prompt as a standard user (not administrator) and run the following
    Gpupdate
    Now wait. It takes a while, but the printers will slowly start to repopulate.
    I am still not sure what is going on with the PCL6 drivers for ricoh, and why this issue is happening. I'm guessing it has something to do with the Ricoh auto update that is included in their pcl6 drivers. Maybe some sort of auto update happened recently.

  • Issue when running acutal Off-cycle payroll in India!

    Dear experts!
    I have an urgent issue when running ACTUAL off-cycle payroll in India as below: "Payroll already performed once in future".
    In testing mode, everything is fine. I have tried to check payroll result in pc_payresult and pu01, and Infotype 3. All of them show the last payroll in 31.07.2011. But now I run off-cycle payroll on 20.08.2011, this error is displayed. So I cannot run actual payroll for them.
    Please help me! I am really appreciated.
    Regards!
    Woody.

    Hello
    Normally this error message reflects an inconsistency in the payroll
    directory cluster, that you can view via RPUDIR00. What you can do to
    restore the consistency is to run the report RPUDIR00 for this pernr
    with the following parameters on the selection screen:
    Payroll for country                           
    Personnel number             
    Compare directory            
    Payroll results structure   
    detailed log                
    Save new directory             X          <  this will write the new directory.  If you want to test first, do not select this parameter.
    Afterwards it should be possible to run payroll for this employee.
    Thanks and Kind Regards
    Ramana

  • Issue with Fiscal Year Varient Period modifications for 2012

    Hi All,
    Can you please advice how the Fiscal Year Varient modified periods be transported to different clients.
    The issue is, we have 2012 Periods already setup in DEV and transported to QAS and PRD, now the clinet came up with different periods for 2012. I have modified the periods as requested and captured them in transport.
    When the new transport was sent to QAS, the new periods are appended to the old periods, instead of replacing the old periods.
    any help is much appreaciated.
    Thanks
    Shasha

    Hi All,
    My issue has been resolved, we figured out that we need to delete the existing calender and capture that in transport and  then recreate the calender for 2012 with new periods and capture this in the same transport and this works.
    Instead of deleting the existing calender we changed the values before, which is the reason it was appedning the previous periods and the new periods.
    Thanks
    Smitha

  • Info Record Validity Dates - Future Period

    Hi Gurus
    can you help
    we have current Purchase Info Recs in place, with pricing condition records that have a validity date that will expire in the next few days
    we have already loaded the next pricing for the next cotnract period with the vendor, but wish to check the accuracy of the data before that pricing condition becomes "current"
    do you know how can we pull the data from the future validity period pricing condition record, so we can validiate this
    i have only found ways to get the current pricing conditions, but not the one for the future period
    please advise
    many thanks

    hi Velu
    we maintain Pricing Condition Type PB00 in ME13
    when i key a Pur Ord for the part, then go to Conditions tab in ME21n, then select the Analysis of the Pricing Condition, it bring up Procedure RM0000
    then Gross Price PB00, then various steps under this
    a number of steps not executed due to requirements not filled etc, being Contracts, outline agreements, Plant Infor Rec Order Unit, then Material Info Rec (Plant Specific)  A017, then Material Info Rec table A018 with various field names
    For Access Sequence step Mat Info Rec (Plant Specific)  it does say No condition record was found for this condition using the document data.
    any thoughts
    If we cannot resolve i shall leave it for now, and review on the day it becomes current
    many thanks

  • Posting run for future period requested

    Dear Team,
    While taking depreciation run for company code in AFAB system is generating the error message "Posting run for future period requested (check entry)" SAP error AA697
    please help to reslove the issue.
    Regards,
    MAhendra

    Hi,
    look into the Threads,
    Can't Run AFAB - Posting run requested for future period
    Regards
    Andi

  • Rejection Reason - Future Period Date Placed in Service

    Hello all,
    While running PRC: Interface Assets to Oracle Assets program, I got Rejection Reason as Future Period Date Placed in Service
    Please give your inputs to clear this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Muthu

    Hi
    The Date Placed on Service should be within an open period in Projects. FA period should also be open.
    It seems you enter a Date placed on service which is later than the end of the open Project period.
    Dina

  • Future period R12

    Hi frnds,
    When I try to open a period in GL I get error telling not enough future period defined. I inserted few future periods and could open period now normally.
    My qustion is, where to check how many future periods do I need to maintain to avaid such error in Oracle EBS R12?
    Thanks,
    Lisan

    Hi Adam, thanks for your reply
    The problem is that, activating this message as an error, all invoice posting are going to be affected. I can't just use it for MIRO transaction, for that matter. Therefore, I should use some user exit implementation or a validation rule.
    Regards,
    Marcelo Buosi.

  • Which invoice validation status transfer to next period or future period.

    Dear All
    can any one explain which invoice validation status transfer to next period or future period.
    The validation status can be 1) Validated 2) Needs revalidation 3) cancelled 4) Approved 5) never validated.
    can i know which validation status moves to next open period and which can be to future open period.
    Regards
    Shaizy
    Edited by: user11298424 on 10 Aug, 2012 2:51 AM

    Hi ,
    I have run the query given by you. it shows Y for posted. but when I query JE_BATCH_ID from AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL, it shows null JE_BATCH_ID.
    How can I get corresponding GL Batch and journals for these invoices?
    JE_BATCH_ID     ACCOUNTING_DATE     PERIOD_NAME     POSTED_FLAG     ACCRUAL_POSTED_FLAG
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y
         3/28/2012     MAR-12     Y     Y

  • Help/understand plz-transcoded footage issue when slowing

    OK...just before I posted this question I tried one last thing and it seemed to resolve the issue stated below BUT I would appreciate an explanation so I understand potential issues in the future since I borrow my friend's cams for church work and one is an AVCHD cam which is great for b-roll/non-audio-important footage.  It appears that removing the "FRAME BLENDING" resolved the issue.
    ISSUE:
    When I slowed the b-roll to 50-80% AND rendered the footage after dropping it over the primary footage, it got all "jittery" (before rendering it was fine).
    DETAILS:
    1) working in FCP 7. 
    2) primary footage on a SONY Z1U (mDV) and b-roll on a SONY CX550 (AVCHD).
    3) transcoded the AVCHD footage from the CX550 to APR 422 (LT)
    As stated, issue seems to be resolved by removing the FRAME BLENDING when changing speed but I'd still appreciate an explanation.  Thanks for your time.
    Glenn

    hi Andrews117,
    Thanks for the follow up info.
    Can you share the link maybe of where you bought it, the actual link 
    I tried checking the system board for your Modeltype number 59383984 
    It listed a Motherboard which is 
    90003237
    VALGD MB W8S UMA
    SYSTEM BOARDS
    This board is a Shared graphics memory and does not have a discrete Video Graphics.
    Please send me the link so I can verify if the link or the posted details from where you bought it was the problem.
    Regards
    Solid Cruver
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Maybe you are looking for

  • With JDBC, calling a stored procedure with ARRAY as out parameter

    Hi, I want to use the data type ARRAY as an out parameter in an Oracle stored procedure. I want to call the stored procedure from my java program using JDBC. The problem it's i use a 8.1.7 client to acces with oci to a 7.1.3 Database. With this confi

  • WSDL dynamic

    Hi Everyone, I have a WSDL generated by a Function Module Web Service Development: [http://dev.xxx.com:1080/sap/bc/srt/wsdl/bndg_4B9BE30395435803E10000000A01F005/wsdl11/allinone/ws_policy/document?sap-client=777] Quality: [http://quality.xxx.com.sa:1

  • TS1717 Unable to launch Itunes

    When I try to launch itunes, I get a blank window with "OK" in but no other message, I can click on the OK, but nothing happens and itunes doesn't launch!  I have tried checking for updates, and I have also shut down and re-started.  To no avail.  La

  • Troubled with PreparedStatement, please help

    Hello all: Here is a seemingly too simple a problem which is already taking my day. Please help. String x=null; String querry1 = null; String querry2 = null; ResultSet rs = null; Statement st = null; PreparedStatement pstmt = null; try { st = conn.cr

  • I just updated iTunes, but when i synch my iPad I get a rotating ball

    This is my situation: I just updated iTunes to the latest 10.5, security update, and safari to prepare updating my system to iOS 5, but when I connect my iPad to my Macbook pro, and launched iTunes, I get a rotating multicolored ball. The application