HSlider causes security violation.

I am pulling image urls from Google using their AS API, and I decided to add an HSlider. Currently the HSlider is just sitting there, with no peroperties set in its tag, but when you click on the slider thumbnail you get this error:
SecurityDomain 'IMAGE_URL_IS_HERE' tried to access incompatible context 'file:///C:/ChikaraDev/src/flexapps/Showcase/MediaBrowser/bin-debug/MediaBrowser.html'
*** Security Sandbox Violation ***
So I'm wondering how an HSlider that literally is not doing anything results in these errors just by clicking its thumbnail.

Is that all you get or is there a full stacktrace.  Unless you get the RTE dialog you can ignore the output
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Developer
Adobe Systems Inc.
Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Similar Messages

  • [svn] 2818: Fix up the remaining uses of stage that might cause a security violation.

    Revision: 2818
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-08-12 12:01:36 -0700 (Tue, 12 Aug 2008)
    Log Message:
    Fix up the remaining uses of stage that might cause a security violation.
    QE: YES
    Doc:
    Checkintests: YES
    Reviewer: Alex
    Bugs:
    mx/controls/DataGrid.as
    mx/controls/List.as
    Listen to mouse down on sandbox root instead of systemManager. Fix remove listener code.
    mx/controls/sliderClasses/SliderThumb.as
    Listen to mouse down on sandbox root instead of systemManager. Remove stage listener for MOUSE_MOVE since
    systemManager will add a stage listener automatically if the caller has access to the stage.
    mx/preloaders/DownloadProgressBar.as
    Use the DownloaderProgressBar's stageWidth/stageHeight properties instead of directly accessing the stage.
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/DataGrid.as
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/List.as
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/sliderClasses/Slide rThumb.as
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/preloaders/DownloadProgressB ar.as

    Revision: 2818
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-08-12 12:01:36 -0700 (Tue, 12 Aug 2008)
    Log Message:
    Fix up the remaining uses of stage that might cause a security violation.
    QE: YES
    Doc:
    Checkintests: YES
    Reviewer: Alex
    Bugs:
    mx/controls/DataGrid.as
    mx/controls/List.as
    Listen to mouse down on sandbox root instead of systemManager. Fix remove listener code.
    mx/controls/sliderClasses/SliderThumb.as
    Listen to mouse down on sandbox root instead of systemManager. Remove stage listener for MOUSE_MOVE since
    systemManager will add a stage listener automatically if the caller has access to the stage.
    mx/preloaders/DownloadProgressBar.as
    Use the DownloaderProgressBar's stageWidth/stageHeight properties instead of directly accessing the stage.
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/DataGrid.as
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/List.as
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/sliderClasses/Slide rThumb.as
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/preloaders/DownloadProgressB ar.as

  • Security violation exception with Weblogic cluster installation on OIm 9.1

    Hi,
    I have OIM9.1 installed on weblogic 8.1 SP4 in clustered environment, which more often than not seems to work fine. But some time I get following exception on server console/log file which causes certain provisioning task to be rejected...
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:224)
    at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:183)
    Caused by: javax.ejb.AccessLocalException: [EJB:010160]Security Violation: User: 'xelsysad
    m' has insufficient permission to access EJB: type=<ejb>, application=Xellerate, module=xl
    DataObjectBeans.jar, ejb=tcFormInstanceOperations, method=create, methodInterface=LocalHom
    e, signature={}.
    at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MethodDescriptor.checkMethodPermissionsLocal(MethodDesc
    riptor.java:486)
    at weblogic.ejb20.internal.StatelessEJBLocalHome.create(StatelessEJBLocalHome.java
    :80)
    at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcFormInstanceOperations_2j82mm_LocalHomeImpl.create(
    tcFormInstanceOperations_2j82mm_LocalHomeImpl.java:93)
    ... 126 more
    ERROR,19 Dec 2008 14:20:03,752,[XELLERATE.APIS],Class/Method: tcBaseUtilityClient/getLocal
    Interface encounter some problems: {1}
    java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.in
    Problem is, I get this exception only 4 out of 6 times (when it is least expected). I have googled, and tried all possible means but have't been able to resolve it. One more thing I am sure of is, it only comes with Weblogic installation not with Jboss. So there should be some configuration issue with weblogic installation.
    Any suggestions would be useful...

    No Response???
    Where are the good guys??

  • Switch por-security - - - Security Violation Count

    I have some question with a device cisco 3400 metroaccess.
    In a interface i have this config.
    3400_METROACESS#sh run int g0/1
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 449 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
     description
     switchport access vlan 192
     switchport port-security
     switchport port-security violation restrict
     bandwidth 800000
     load-interval 30
     media-type rj45
     speed 1000
     duplex full
     mac access-group Block-Invalid-ERS-Frames in
     service-policy input 800M
     service-policy output LIMIT_QQ1
    end
    3400_METROACESS#sh port-security int g0/1
    Port Security              : Enabled
    Port Status                : Secure-up
    Violation Mode             : Restrict
    Aging Time                 : 0 mins
    Aging Type                 : Absolute
    SecureStatic Address Aging : Disabled
    Maximum MAC Addresses      : 5
    Total MAC Addresses        : 2
    Configured MAC Addresses   : 0
    Sticky MAC Addresses       : 0
    Last Source Address:Vlan   : XXXX.XXXX.XXXX:192
    Security Violation Count   : 3515----------------------------------------->what is the default parameter or the petitions permited, for the security violation take the action mode.
    I have many logs from the int g0/1
    Apr 23 16:08:37: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address XXXX.XXXX.XXXX on port GigabitEthernet0/1.
    Thanks you for your help.
    Best Regards!!

    The default (initial) count is 0, the number increases everything there is a violation. 
    you can reinitialize (clear) that counter by using the command : clear port-security all int g 0/1

  • E03 Program RSUSR003 Reports Security violation in SM21

    Hello All,
    I am getting below error in SM21:
    "E03 Program RSUSR003 Reports Security violation"
    ============================================================
    Documentation for system log message E03 :
    The specified program encountered a problem. A short message in English
    is output describing the problem.
    If there are no other related entries in the system log, the program
    solved or at least found a workaround to the problem.
    If these messages occur frequently, or the program is unable to
    complete processing, notify SAP of the message and include the module
    name and location, or the line number of the system log message. This
    helps the support team locate the cause of the error.
    In this context a program is an independent component at the
    operating system level.
    ==============================================================
    Can you please let me know how to proceed.
    Best Regards,
    Pratyusha.

    Pratyusha
    RSUSR003 displays logon system settings and checks passwords of SAP*, DDIC, SAPCPIC, EARLYWATCH (critical accounts).
    This message appears in the system log when the report is run as Dialog or in Background and there is some violation that needs to be reviewed.
    If run in background, there should be a spool to review.
    If run in dialog, the output should be the same as the spool (with any possible differences from the time of the runs).
    Hope this helps.
    PJ

  • SG-500-28P How to configure switchport port-security violation setting

    Is there a way to do switchport port-security violation {protect | restrict | shutdown} in SG-500-28P in case of a BPDU Guard violation?
    Seems like the default option is shutdown and I don't know how to change it.
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    you can recover this Violation.By using below command:
    To enable automatic re-activation of an interface after an Err-Disable shutdown, 
    use the errdisable recovery cause Global Configuration mode command. To 
    disable automatic re-activation, use the no form of this command.
    Syntax
    errdisable recovery cause {all | port-security | dot1x-src-address | acl-deny | 
    stp-bpdu-guard | loopback-detection | udld }
    no errdisable recovery cause {all | port-security | dot1x-src-address | acl-deny | 
    stp-bpdu-guard | loopback-detection | udld }
    For more information:
    Refer this URL:page no :406
    http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/Sx500/cli_guide/CLI_500.pdf
    regards
    Moorthy

  • Security Violation when using -link to sun APIs

    I'm interested in a work around for this irritating (but non-critical) bug:
    When I create application docs that -link to the sun APIs, moving from my Javadoc pages to the sun API pages causes a browser security violation:
    Line: 13
    Error: Access is denied.
    The offending function is:
    function asd()
    parent.document.title="Object (Java 2 Platform SE v1.4.0)";
    You see, from my application, the 'parent' domain isn't java.sun.com.
    Only programmers see this in any significant way (with a debug dialog box popping up.) Others just see 'done with errors on page.'
    Can this get fixed? How? When?
    Thanks,
    F. Randall Farmer
    State Software, Inc.

    This is a known bug:
    http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4645058.html
    We hope to fix this for 1.4.2, but cannot guarantee it.
    The purpose of this Javascript is when using frames, it puts the
    name of the class in the window title. This enables you to
    not only see the name of the class when the window is open,
    but also see the name of the class when the window is
    minimized and appears on the Windows task bar.
    In the example shown, "Object" is the name of the class.
    The bug might be due to the fact that the <SCRIPT>
    element is neither in the <HEAD> nor in the <BODY>,
    but between them.
    -Doug Kramer
    Javadoc team

  • IPSec Security Violation iTunes Desktop On Shutdown

    I could use some insight into why the iTunes desktop is causing a security violation when I shut the program down. I am receiving the following failure audit code in the Event Viewer/Security File:
    Event ID 615
    Error Message Received:
    IP Sec Services: IPSec Services failed to get the complete list of network interfaces on the machine. This can be a potential security hazard to the machine since some of the network interfaces may not get the protection as desired by the applied IPSec filters. Please run IPSec monitor snap-in to further diagnose the problem.
    IPSec Snap-in Statistics:
    When I run the snap in I am not receiving any changes in values within the IPSec Statistics. All categories are reflecting “0”. Within the IKS Statistics the following two categories values have been changed to “1”, Active Acquire and Acquire Heap Size. I am allowing an exception to occur within my firewall for iTunes.
    This problem is only occurring when I shut the program down and the error message is appearing randomly in the event viwer. Any help would be greatly appreciated in helping me understand why this is occurring.
    OS: Windows XP Home SP2 Toshiba 1135/S155 Laptop

    B Noir
    After my last discussion with you on this subject matter I continued receive the 615-error code in my Event Viewer\Security folder. This really ticked me off my friend. All along I thought iTunes was the source of the problem. But this just was not the case. Before I present to you the actual problem I will say by changing the Target Scope on the firewall it did resolve some minor issues that I was having with iTunes. My apologies for any misunderstandings that may have taken place on this issue. Therefore, let me present the following information to you to settle this issue once and for all:
    Event Viewer – Failure Audit Id 615 Description – Security Folder
    Source: Security
    Category: Policy Change
    Failure Aud Event Id: 615
    User: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE
    Computer: OWNER-(For security reasons I have removed the rest of this information)
    Description:
    IPSec. Services: IPSec Services failed to get the complete list of Network Interfaces on the machine. This can be a potential security hazard to the machine since some of the interfaces may not get the protection as desired by the applied IPSec. Filters. Please run IPSec. Monitor to further diagnose the problem.
    Notes:
    This event discussion will apply to the following modem:
    2Wire 1700HW
    SN: 384114124206
    Assembly Number: 4200-00174-000
    When this event occurred no special filters were in place. All settings were set to “Default” system wide. Snap-in Monitor: IKE Statistics were in normal range. IPSec. Statistics values did not change indicating any problems.
    I was determined to find out what was causing the problem. So, since the 615 entries were identified as a security issue I contacted MS Security Department as my starting point. After an hour of discussion with the security team and ruling out the possibilities it was not security related. So, they shot me over to the Windows XP Home SP2 support team. After ruling out any Windows based problems we determined that it was a Modem\port issue that was causing the problem.
    Now that I had a starting to point to work with my final investigation produced the final solution to correct the problem.
    When the event occurred I was receiving the entry’s randomly on start-up\reboot. After several hours of discussions and running tests with a BellSouth tech, I tracked the problem down to my Troubleshooting – Event Log in the 2Wire MDC\Management and Diagnostic Console. A BellSouth Tech Supervisor confirmed this problem once I identified the possible source.
    Source of the problem: “Bad Modem\Port Issue” on link up. The modem is not connecting properly on link-up with the server. As a result I began having lost connection entries indicating that the service was restarting itself on the lost connection. To confirm my lost connection findings I installed a Server Monitor and set the monitor to “Poll” the server in one-minute intervals. The source of the actual problem in this case will be centered on the following connection process: “vlanmon0”. I have provided a copy of the link-up process tree for your review.
    Final Summary: At times I was receiving a lot of lost connection entries in the MDC event log. This is what was causing the 615 entries to occur in the event log on my machine. You will not automatically receive a 615 entry in the Event Viewer\Security folder on lost connections. Again in this case I was only receiving the entries on start-up\reboot randomly.
    What was more frustrating is when the events started to occur I went to my command prompt and pinged the IP’s within the routing table I kept coming back with 100% Success back to the server. Bottlenecking at the Socket Connection was also ruled out. I spent a total of five hours over a two-day period diagnosing the problem. I even allowed the tech to do a remote access session on my machine. In the end I had nothing but kudos’ on how well my machine was set-up and protected. Final conclusion: BellSouth will be replacing the modem.
    615 error codes can be very difficult to resolve. In closing my discussion with you on this issue I would advise caution in resolving this issue due to the many variables involved with IPSec Services.
    Thank you for the intelligent discussion on the issue.
    2WIRE MDC - Link Tree
    Management and Diagnostic Console
    Advanced – Link Manager States
    root
    |-->homenet0 is up
    ||-->vlan0 is up
    ||\-->ipv4net1 is up
    || |-->vlanmon0 is up >>>>>>>(Source of Event Id 615 in Security Folder)
    || \-->ipv4bridge2 is up
    |\-->vlan3 is up
    \-->broadband0 is up
    \-->adsl0 is up
    Snap Shot of today’s lost connection: 2Wire Troubleshooting – Event Log
    Type Date/Time Event Description
    INF +000 days 00:00:00 SYS: System started
    INF 2003/01/15 05:00:01 EST SYS: Set system clock from: 1969/12/31 19:00:00 EST
    INF 2003/01/15 05:00:03 EST SYS: ipv4net1: Up on vlan0 with 192.168.1.254/24
    INF 2003/01/15 05:00:24 EST SYS: ppp0: Up with ipv4 service on pppoe0
    INF 2003/01/15 05:00:24 EST SYS: ipv4net0: Up on ppp0 with 72.155.108.75/32
    INF 2006/09/05 07:02:42 EDT SYS: Set system clock from: 2003/01/15 05:00:25 EST
    INF 2006/09/05 08:44:56 EDT SYS: Successfully logged into a password protected page
    INF 2006/09/05 16:48:19 EDT SYS: Successfully logged into a password protected page
    INF 2006/09/05 20:18:35 EDT SYS: vlanmon0: connection lost, reconnecting...
    INF 2006/09/06 06:20:08 EDT SYS: Successfully logged into a password protected page
    INF 2006/09/06 06:21:25 EDT SYS: Successfully logged into a password protected page
    INF 2006/09/06 09:50:24 EDT SYS: Successfully logged into a password protected page
    Jblittlejohn
    OS: Toshiba Satellite 1135’S155 Windows XP SP2
    Server: BellSouth – DSL Lite
    Socket Connection: LPT2T1

  • Weblogic 10.3.0 -  Security Violation when Group Membership Lookup enabled

    Dear Admins,
    We're running a Weblogic 10.3.0 cluster with our own software deployed.
    We're using SQL authentication (JDBC to Oracle DB) to authenticate users.
    Recently we've been tuning our WL cluster to improve performance, and have enabled Group Membership Lookup Hierarchy Caching.
    Sometimes users log into our application and get inssuficient rights (or some other error). This appears to happen at random. Most of the times they can log in without problems.
    We determined it's not something to do with the cluster, although it can happen on one node and the other node will work as normal.
    In the Managed server we see this error (with test user):
    Managed7Server.out00011:java.rmi.AccessException: [EJB:010160]Security Violation: User: 'test' has insufficient permission to access EJB: type=<ejb>, application=leanapps, module=process_general.jar, ejb=LaLifeProcessController,
    method=create, methodInterface=Home, signature={}.
    When we disable Group Membership Lookup Hierarchy Caching, this error never occurs.
    Our settings (Security Realms -> myrealm -> Providers -> SQL Authenticator -> Performance):
    Max Group Hierarchies In Cache: 5000 (we have approx. 2000 groups)
    Group Hierarchy Cache TTL: 3600
    provider specific settings :
    Group Membership Searching: unlimited
    Max Group Membership Search Level: 0
    Also in Myrealm -> Performance we have set :
    Enable WebLogic Principal Validator Cache
    Max WebLogic Principals In Cache: 5000
    If we put the TTL really low (default 60 seconds), the error hardly ever occurs. But we want to have cache that lasts longer then one minute.
    This might be a bug, as we have other clusters running on WL 10.3.5, 12c where we use the same cache settings. This issue does not occur there.
    I'm more then willing to provide more info or config files
    Edited by: user5974192 on 21-nov-2012 5:17

    This is fixed now. Someone had defined a Servlet for the web service in web.xml that was preventing the EJB container to kick in.
    Edited by: user572625 on Aug 25, 2011 11:54 PM

  • Error encountered while signing: The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error: Access was denied because of a security violation. Error Code: 2148532330

    Last night when i tried to sign a document i received the mesage below and after that it says this document can't be signed what can i do to fix this problem.
    Error encountered while signing:
    The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error:
    Access was denied because of a security violation.
    Error Code: 2148532330

    I assume you are implying "biztax" application here, right?
    I have contacted their program lead, with no result at all.
    Past days I have been searching for a solution - reinstalls / new systems - no solution.
    This issue appeared a week or two ago only.
    I found http://forums.adobe.com/message/5338853 useful - but no positive results either.
    http://test.eid.belgium.be/faq/faq_nl.htm obviously didnt help either.
    If anyone finds a solution to this issue, please do let me know - any help is appreciated.
    Biztax tells to use the "signature", not the "authentication"  - but it is only Auth. that is showing up as option to sign (that works)
    ps, did you fiddle with the Adobe Reader XI security settings and import that PKI etc as well? I hoped that would be the breaktrough. Sadly i'm still crying in my chair.
    Oh, and dont forget: they claim nobody else got this issue. Maybe one or two people. (We got about 8 customers experiencing exactly the same symptoms at the same time )
    >  I noticed that when I try to open the pdf  document that is 'signed' by the government it is not showing the filename in the title bar, but only " - Adobe Reader".    every piece of info helps I guess.
    Obviously last version of Reader   11.0.03

  • Security Violation Error while running schedule task from OIM.

    Hi All,
    I am getting this error while running a custom java schedule task from OIM:
    *Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException [EJB:010160] Security Violation: User '<anonymous>' has insufficient permission to access EJB:*
    type=<ejb>,application=Xellerate,module=xlDataObjectBeans.jar,ejb=tcReconciliationoperations,method=createDeleteReconciliationEvent
    at Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsClient.createDeleteReconciliationEvent(UnKnown Source).
    I got this error as soon as my code start creating Delete Reconciliation Event.
    Note: I have already protected the JNDI Namespace.
    Please provide some pointers.
    Regards,
    Sunny

    Hi Rajiv,
    Check this:
    package com.centrica.iam.scheduletask;
    import java.io.BufferedReader;
    import java.io.File;
    import java.io.FileFilter;
    import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
    import java.io.FileReader;
    import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.Calendar;
    import java.util.Date;
    import java.util.HashMap;
    import java.util.Hashtable;
    import java.util.Iterator;
    import java.util.Set;
    import oracle.iam.connectors.common.ConnectorLogger;
    import com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSet;
    import com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSetException;
    import com.thortech.xl.dataobj.PreparedStatementUtil;
    import com.thortech.xl.orb.dataaccess.tcDataAccessException;
    import com.thortech.xl.scheduler.tasks.SchedulerBaseTask;
    import Thor.API.tcResultSet;
    import Thor.API.Exceptions.tcAPIException;
    import Thor.API.Exceptions.tcInvalidValueException;
    import Thor.API.Operations.tcLookupOperationsIntf;
    import Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsIntf;
    import Thor.API.Operations.tcSchedulerOperationsIntf;
    public class CustomFlatFile extends SchedulerBaseTask {
         private static tcSchedulerOperationsIntf schedulerIntf;
         private static tcLookupOperationsIntf lookupIntf;
         private static tcReconciliationOperationsIntf reconIntf;
         String sObjectName;
         String LookupName;
         String LookupName2;
         String FileDirectory;
         String FileName;
         String File;
         String delimeter;
         String isDeleteTrue;
         HashMap<String, String> attrMap = new HashMap();
         HashMap<String, String> delMap = new HashMap();
         HashMap<String, String> finalMap = new HashMap();
         ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
         public boolean isReconStopped;
         public CustomFlatFile()
              isReconStopped = false;
         public void init()
              LookupName = getAttribute("Attribute Lookup Name");
              FileDirectory = getAttribute("Directory Path");
              FileName = getAttribute("File Name");
              delimeter = getAttribute("Delimeter");
              sObjectName = getAttribute("Resource Object Name");
              isDeleteTrue = getAttribute("Is Delete Allowed");
         public void execute(){
              try {
                   System.out.println("Start Exceute");
                   //Initiate lookupIntf
                   lookupIntf = (tcLookupOperationsIntf)getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcLookupOperationsIntf");
                   reconIntf=(tcReconciliationOperationsIntf)getUtility("Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsIntf");
                   catch (tcAPIException tcapiexception){
                        tcapiexception.printStackTrace();
                        //logger.error(classname, s, tcapiexception.toString());
                        //logger.setStackTrace(tcapiexception, classname, s, tcapiexception.getMessage());
                   catch (Exception excep){
                        excep.printStackTrace();
                        //logger.error(classname, s, excep.toString());
                        //logger.setStackTrace(excep, classname, s, excep.getMessage());
                   attrMap = readLookup(LookupName);
                   System.out.println(attrMap.toString());
                   readFile();
                   if (isDeleteTrue.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
                        performDelete();
                   System.out.println("Finish Execute");
         public void performDelete()
              System.out.println("Start Perform delete");
              int k = list.size();
              System.out.println("list size " + list.size());
              try
                   Thread.sleep(15000);
         /*     Hashtable ahashtable[] = new Hashtable[k];
              Hashtable hashtable = new Hashtable();
              for (int i=0;i<k;i++)
                   hashtable.put("User Id", list.get(i));
                   ahashtable[i] = hashtable;
                   System.out.println(list.get(i));
              Set set = reconIntf.provideDeletionDetectionData(sObjectName, ahashtable);
              System.out.println("Set--" + set.toString());
              tcResultSet tcresultset = reconIntf.getMissingAccounts(sObjectName, set);
              System.out.println("tcresultset - " + tcresultset.getRowCount());
              if (!(tcresultset.isEmpty()))
                   long l[] = reconIntf.deleteDetectedAccounts(tcresultset);
                   for (int i1=0;i1<l.length;i1++)
                        System.out.println("delete recon key " + l[i1]);
              //Get the existing list of Managed users
                   tcDataSet tcdataset = new tcDataSet();
                   tcDataSet tcdataset1 = new tcDataSet();
                   String query = "select orf.orf_fieldname,prf.prf_columnname, sdk.sdk_name from orf, sdk, pkg, tos, prf, obj " +
                             "where pkg.obj_key = obj.obj_key and pkg.pkg_key = tos.pkg_key and tos.sdk_key is not null " +
                             "and tos.sdk_key=sdk.sdk_key and tos.tos_key=prf.tos_key and prf.prf_iskey='1' and prf.orf_key=orf.orf_key " +
                             "and orf.orf_parent_orf_key is null and obj.obj_name='" + sObjectName + "'";
                   tcdataset.setQuery(getDataBase(), query);
                   tcdataset.executeQuery();
                   String FFName = tcdataset.getString("prf_columnname");
                   String FName = tcdataset.getString("sdk_name");
                   String ROFName = tcdataset.getString("orf_fieldname");
                   System.out.println("form- " + FName + " Field- " + FFName);
                   query = "select " + FFName + " from " + FName + " udtable, oiu a, ost b " +
                             "where udtable.orc_key=a.orc_key and a.ost_key=b.ost_key and b.ost_status!='Revoked'";
                   System.out.println(query);
                   tcdataset1.setQuery(getDataBase(), query);
                   tcdataset1.executeQuery();
                   int i = tcdataset1.getRowCount();
                   ArrayList list1 = new ArrayList();
                   String s1 = null;
                   System.out.println("N. of rows--" + i);
                   for (int j=0;j<i;j++)
                        tcdataset1.goToRow(j);
                        s1 = tcdataset1.getString(0);
                        System.out.println("s1---" + s1);
                        if (!(list.contains(s1)))
                             list1.add(s1);
                             System.out.println("under if--" + s1);
                   //Getting the existing list of unmanaged users
                   query = "select distinct (b.rcd_value) from rce a, rcd b, orf c, obj d where a.rce_key=b.rce_key and " +
                             "b.orf_key=c.orf_key and c.orf_fieldname='" + ROFName + "' and a.rce_status!='Event Linked' " +
                                       "and a.obj_key = d.obj_key and d.obj_name='" + sObjectName + "'";
                   tcdataset1.setQuery(getDataBase(), query);
                   tcdataset1.executeQuery();
                   i = tcdataset1.getRowCount();
                   System.out.println("No. Of Unmanaged Users " + i);
                   for (int j=0;j<i;j++)
                        tcdataset1.goToRow(j);
                        s1 = tcdataset1.getString(0);
                        System.out.println("s1---" + s1);
                        if (!(list.contains(s1)))
                             list1.add(s1);
                             System.out.println("under if--" + s1);
                   int k1 = list1.size();
                   System.out.println("list1 size--" + k1);
                   for (int j1=0;j1<k1;j1++)
                        delMap.clear();
                        delMap.put(ROFName, (String)list1.get(j1));
                        System.out.println(delMap.toString());
                        long l = reconIntf.createDeleteReconciliationEvent(sObjectName, delMap);
                        System.out.println("delete recon key--- " + l);
              catch (Exception exception)
                   exception.printStackTrace();
         public void readFile(){
              String s = "readFile()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              HashMap map = new HashMap();
              try {
              File = getFile();
              BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(new
                        File(File)));
              String line = "";
              int k = attrMap.size();
              String value[] = new String[k];
              String Header[]= new String[k];
              if (delimeter.equalsIgnoreCase("|"))
                   delimeter = "\\" + delimeter;
                   line = reader.readLine();
                   Header = line.split(delimeter);
                   while((line = reader.readLine()) != null)
                        value = line.split(delimeter);
                        k = value.length;
                        for (int i = 0;i<k;i++){
                             finalMap.put(attrMap.get(Header), value[i]);
                        System.out.println(finalMap.toString());
                        System.out.println("Start Ignoring Event");
                        if (!(reconIntf.ignoreEvent(sObjectName, finalMap)))
                             System.out.println("Not Ignored");
                        long l1 = reconIntf.createReconciliationEvent(sObjectName, finalMap, true);
                        System.out.println("Recon Key--" + l1);
                        else
                             System.out.println("ignore event ---" + finalMap.toString());
                        list.add(finalMap.get("User Id"));
                        System.out.println(list.size() + "add--" +finalMap.get("User Id") );
                        finalMap.clear();
              catch (Exception exception)
                   exception.printStackTrace();
         public boolean stop(){
              String s = "stop()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              //logger.info(classname, s, "Stopping Reconciliation........");
              isReconStopped = true;
              //logger.setMethodFinishLog(classname, s);
              return true;
         FileFilter fileFilter = new FileFilter()
         public boolean accept(File file)
         String sFilePath = file.getName();
         if( sFilePath.startsWith(FileName) )
         return true;
         else
         return false;
         public String getFile() throws FileNotFoundException, Exception{
              String s = "getFile()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              String s1;
              File dir =     new File(FileDirectory);
              File[] files = dir.listFiles(fileFilter);
              if (files.length ==0)
                   throw new FileNotFoundException();
              if (files.length>1)
                   throw new Exception("Multiple Matches found for this file name");
              s1 = files[0].toString();
              //logger.setMethodFinishLog(classname, s);
              return s1;
         public HashMap readLookup(String s1){
              String s = "readLookup()";
              //logger.setMethodStartLog(classname, s);
              HashMap map = new HashMap();
              try {
              tcResultSet tc1=     lookupIntf.getLookupValues(s1);
              int i = tc1.getRowCount();
              for (int j = 0;j<i;j++){
                   tc1.goToRow(j);
                   map.put(tc1.getStringValue("Lookup Definition.Lookup Code Information.Code Key"), tc1.getStringValue("Lookup Definition.Lookup Code Information.Decode"));
              catch (tcAPIException tcapiexception){
                   tcapiexception.printStackTrace();
                   //logger.error(classname, s, tcapiexception.toString());
                   //logger.setStackTrace(tcapiexception, classname, s, tcapiexception.getMessage());
              catch (Exception excep){
                   excep.printStackTrace();
                   //logger.error(classname, s, excep.toString());
                   //logger.setStackTrace(excep, classname, s, excep.getMessage());
              return map;

  • Security Violation during PATH Variable Substitution

    Hi -
    I' m trying to write a file with the receiver file adapter by the variable substitution feature from SP12 on.
    Whereas the %filename% variable works fine, I get for the %path% variable an exception in the adapter engine, whenever I'm trying either
    - to use an absolute path like "/tmp" or
    - composed pathnames like "tmp/test" (that are based on $XIHOME/j2ee/cluster/server0)
    Non-composed pathnames like $XIHOME/j2ee/cluster/server0/tmp by setting %path% to "tmp" work also.
    Any clue?
    I'm on AIX on SP12.
    Here is the exception:
    java.text.ParseException: Security violation encountered during variable substitution: Content of variable path is not safe
    Thanks.
    Stefan

    Hi Stefan,
    did you check the flag 'Disable Security Checks' in the communication channel?
    Regards
    Stefan

  • 802.1X Port Based Authentication - IP Phone- MDA - Port Security Violation

    I have configured 802.1X authentication on selected ports of a Cisco Catalyst 2960S with Micorsoft NPS Radius authentication on a test LAN. I have tested the authentication with a windows XP laptop, a windows 7 laptop with 802.1X, eap-tls authentication and a Mitel 5330 IP Phone using EAP-MD5 aithentication. All the above devices work with with the MS NPS server. However in MDA mode when the  802.1x compliant  windows 7 laptop is connected to the already authenticated Mitel IP Phone, the port experiences a security violation and the goes into error sdisable mode.
    Feb  4 19:16:16.571: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %DOT1X-5-SUCCESS: Authentication successful for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Gi1/0/1, putting Gi1/0/1 in err-disable state
    Feb  4 19:16:17.651: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    Feb  4 19:16:18.658: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    If the port config  is changed to "authentication host-mode multi-auth", and the laptop is connected to the phone the port does not experience the security violation but the 802.1x authentication for the laptop fails.
    The ports GI1/0./1 & Gi1/02 are configured thus:
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 20
    authentication event fail action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event server alive action reinitialize
    authentication host-mode multi-domain
    authentication order dot1x mab
    authentication priority dot1x mab
    authentication port-control auto
    mab
    mls qos trust cos
    dot1x pae authenticator
    spanning-tree portfast
    sh ver
    Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image
    *    1 52    WS-C2960S-48FPS-L  15.2(1)E1             C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
    Full config attached. Assistance will be grately appreciated.
    Donfrico

    I am currently trying to get 802.1x port authentication working on a Cat3550 against Win2003 IAS but the IAS log shows a invalid message-authenticator error. The 3550 just shows failed. When I authenticate against Cisco ACS (by simply changing the radius-server) it works perfectly.
    However, I am successfully using IAS to authenticate WPA users on AP1210s so RADIUS appears to be OK working OK.
    Are there special attributes that need to be configured on the switch or IAS?

  • 802.1X Port Based Authentication Security Violation

    I have configured 802.1X authentication on selected ports of a Cisco Catalyst 2960S with Micorsoft NPS Radius authentication on a test LAN. I have tested the authentication with a windows XP laptop, a windows 7 laptop with 802.1X, eap-tls authentication and a Mitel 5330 IP Phone using EAP-MD5 aithentication. All the above devices work with with the MS NPS server. However in MDA mode when the  802.1x compliant  windows 7 laptop is connected to the already authenticated Mitel IP Phone, the port experiences a security violation and the goes into error sdisable mode.
    Feb  4 19:16:16.571: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %DOT1X-5-SUCCESS: Authentication successful for client (24b6.fdfa.749b) on Interface Gi1/0/1 AuditSessionID AC10A0FE0000002F000D3CED
    Feb  4 19:16:16.645: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: security-violation error detected on Gi1/0/1, putting Gi1/0/1 in err-disable state
    Feb  4 19:16:17.651: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    Feb  4 19:16:18.658: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to down
    If the port config  is changed to "authentication host-mode multi-auth", and the laptop is connected to the phone the port does not experience the security violation but the 802.1x authentication for the laptop fails.
    The ports GI1/0./1 & Gi1/02 are configured thus:
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 20
    authentication event fail action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 4
    authentication event server alive action reinitialize
    authentication host-mode multi-domain
    authentication order dot1x mab
    authentication priority dot1x mab
    authentication port-control auto
    mab
    mls qos trust cos
    dot1x pae authenticator
    spanning-tree portfast
    sh ver
    Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image
    *    1 52    WS-C2960S-48FPS-L  15.2(1)E1             C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M
    Full config attached. Assistance will be grately appreciated.
    Donfrico

    I believe , you need to configure re-authentication on this switch port:
    ! Enable re-authentication
    authentication periodic
    ! Enable re-authentication via RADIUS Session-Timeout
    authentication timer reauthenticate server

  • Security violation error (error code 2148532330) in Acrobat Pro XI with Windows 8

    I have two certificates, physically residing on the same (Belgian) government issued smart card. One is labeled "Authentication" (Intended usage: sign transaction), and the other is labeled "Signature" (Intended usage: sign document). I have been trying to add a signature to a pdf document in Acrobat Pro XI (trial) on WIndows 8 Home (64 bit). It works perfectly with the "Authentication" certificate, but all attempts with the "Signature" certificate yield the following error:
    Error encountered while signing:
    The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error:
    Access was denied because of a security violation.
    Error Code: 2148532330
    The only relevant difference between both certificates that I have been able to spot, is in the "key usage" field of the certificate ("sign transaction" versus "sign document"). Any thoughts on what might be wrong?
    Thanks.

    I assume you are implying "biztax" application here, right?
    I have contacted their program lead, with no result at all.
    Past days I have been searching for a solution - reinstalls / new systems - no solution.
    This issue appeared a week or two ago only.
    I found http://forums.adobe.com/message/5338853 useful - but no positive results either.
    http://test.eid.belgium.be/faq/faq_nl.htm obviously didnt help either.
    If anyone finds a solution to this issue, please do let me know - any help is appreciated.
    Biztax tells to use the "signature", not the "authentication"  - but it is only Auth. that is showing up as option to sign (that works)
    ps, did you fiddle with the Adobe Reader XI security settings and import that PKI etc as well? I hoped that would be the breaktrough. Sadly i'm still crying in my chair.
    Oh, and dont forget: they claim nobody else got this issue. Maybe one or two people. (We got about 8 customers experiencing exactly the same symptoms at the same time )
    >  I noticed that when I try to open the pdf  document that is 'signed' by the government it is not showing the filename in the title bar, but only " - Adobe Reader".    every piece of info helps I guess.
    Obviously last version of Reader   11.0.03

Maybe you are looking for