HT203088 Support for RAW for format in Samsung NX30

Have just acquired Samsung NX30 Smart camera. Have Aperture 3.6. Upload RAW files?
Have Yosemite 10.10.3

Larry, thx for the clarity. I didn't realize asking about future directions was a no-no here.
I since found an Apple document indicating support for the Leica D-LUX 3 and RAW format in an OS 10.4.10(?) release. I think I'll have to drag my Mac to the camera store, take a few pics with the D-LUX 3, attempt to sync and see if/how the RAW images come over, and then advise here on if it worked with OS 10.5.2 and iPhoto '08.
Peter

Similar Messages

  • Announcement: Adobe Revel now supports the raw file format!

    You asked, we listened! Revel 2.2 for iOS and adoberevel.com now support the raw file formats listed below:
    (premium subscribers only)
    arw (SONY)
    cr2 (CANON)
    crw (CANON)
    dng
    erf (EPSON)
    raf (FUJI)
    3fr, fff (HASSELBLAD)
    dcr (KODAK)
    mrw (KONICA)
    mos (LEAF)
    rwl (LEICA)
    nef, nrw (NIKON)
    orf (OLYMPUS)
    rw2 (PANASONIC)
    pef (PENTAX)
    srw (SAMSUNG)

    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras  I do not see that SX60 as supported. Just how new is the SX60 when was it announces. Its support is not even listed in ACR 8.7 RC

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10963: Integrating latest FXGUtils that removes support for  format to reflect FXG 2.0 final specification, as well as corrected bounds calculations, including corrections for stroke width.

    Revision: 10963
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2009-10-09 16:19:35 -0700 (Fri, 09 Oct 2009)
    Log Message:
    Integrating latest FXGUtils that removes support for related test as that has been removed from FXG 2.0. The updated bounds calculations mean that bitmap compares for stroke related tests will need to be updated.
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: N/A
    Reviewer: Min
    Tests run: Checkintests, mustella spark/core/fxg (bounds change tests were excluded)
    Is noteworthy for integration: Yes, this includes corrections to bounds calculations and thus changes rendering.
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/fxg/FXGCompiler.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/fxg/FlexFXG2SWFTranscoder.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/lang/StandardDefs.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/fxg/FXGConstants.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/fxg/FXGException_en.properties
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/fxg/swf/FXG2SWFTranscoder.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/AbstractFXGNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/AbstractShapeNode.jav a
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/CDATANode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/EllipseNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/GraphicContentNode.ja va
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/GraphicContext.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/GraphicNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/LineNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/MaskableNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/PathNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/RectNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/RichTextNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/TextGraphicNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/TextNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/fills/BitmapFillNode. java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/AbstractRich BlockTextNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/AbstractRich ParagraphNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/AbstractRich TextLeafNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/AbstractRich TextNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/DivNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/LinkNode.jav a
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/ParagraphNod e.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/TCYNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/strokes/AbstractStrok eNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/text/AbstractTextNode .java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/types/FillMode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/sax/FXG_v2_0_Handler.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/swf/ImageHelper.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/swf/ShapeHelper.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/swf/TypeHelper.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/types/FXGMatrix.java
    Added Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/TextHelper.j ava
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/TextLayoutFo rmatNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/TextProperty Node.java
    Removed Paths:
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/FormatNode.j ava
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/LinkActiveFo rmatNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/LinkHoverFor matNode.java
        flex/sdk/trunk/modules/fxgutils/src/java/com/adobe/internal/fxg/dom/richtext/LinkNormalFo rmatNode.java

  • Preview does not support the raw file format of the nikon d300s

    preview does not support the files and snow leopard does not provide icon previews either.
    is there any date when there will be support for these type of files?
    any suggestions on how to open the NEF files with preview in the meantime there is an update?
    regards

    any suggestions on how to open the NEF files with preview in the meantime there is an update?
    Not with Preview, but Nikon Transfer v1.0.1.3005 is so far happy with 10.6.1 and you may see if there is any advantage there. Take the card out of the 300s and use a reader if you have to.
    It usually takes from 3 to 6 months before Apple releases a new/specific Nikon RAW related update, so you are at the beginning of that cycle it would appear...all you can do is wait, sorry.

  • LR 3 support for Samsung TL350 (WB2000)?

    Hi all,
    does the LR3 update that now supports the RAW files of the Samsung TL500 (EX1) also support the RAW files of the Samsung TL350 (WB2000)? If not, I would be grateful if this camera could be added to the list in another update! Thanks to the Adobe team in advance!
    Cheers,
    jazzy

    jazzcrab wrote:
    Hi all,
    does the LR3 update that now supports the RAW files of the Samsung TL500 (EX1) also support the RAW files of the Samsung TL350 (WB2000)? If not, I would be grateful if this camera could be added to the list in another update! Thanks to the Adobe team in advance!
    Cheers,
    jazzy
    Hi Jazzy!
    Have the same problem!
    How do you deal with it now?
    Is there a possibility yet to use .srw from the wb2000?
    (instead of the samsung software)
    If you have time...
    please write your request (that adobe puts those cams into "bridge" or "lightroom") into the request area of Bridge.
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/bridge/bridge_feature_requests
    We have to make preasure to them!
    thx, lukas

  • Aperture support for unsupported raw formats

    I was doing some tests with Aperture to see if it could fit my workflow. My concern was support of old files from a Nikon Coolpix 5400, raw (thanks to firmware update at the time) as well as a recent Nikon DSLR. No problem with the DSLR. 5400 was not supported. After some internet research I found out there is a pref file (Raw.plist in /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/ ImageIO.framework/Versions/A/Resources) that has info about all supported cameras. This add raw support for the cameras listed in the file for Preview, iPhoto, Aperture (system-wide). Same list that Apple provides as camera compatibility list.
    In that list I chose to duplicate the NIKON-E8400 array and renamed it NIKON-E5400. Didn't change any value in the array. To my surprise, even without rebooting, this added support for the Nikon Coolpix 5400 images. The image looks pretty much the same with these default settings (when opened in Preview for example) than it does in ACR in CS2. The only odd difference is the image size loosing 10 vertical pixels (from 2592x1944 opened in ACR CS2 to 2592x1934). I have no idea why it does this but it is no big deal really as it is no scaling, just loss of pixels.
    I am a bit concerned of course about the possibility to carry on this tweak in the next OS updates.
    I guess any raw from any camera could have support this way.
    Just need to name the array in Raw.plist properly. For mine I just opened a raw in text edit and saw first line the name of camera, was "NIKONE5400". I compared the format of this name to other names in the array and decided to add the "-" to look like others so "NIKON-E5400", and that was it. Now I was lucky the default setting for the 8400 I used as a base worked for the 5400, apparently. It could have not been the case and then I would have had to play with the values in the array. Quite a few so a long process I am afraid, but possible.
    The deal would be to release a little utility software that would let us play with these values easily and see a result live on a sample image, and once satisfied it would modify this Raw.plist file. This way people could add support to their own raws.
    If anyone in the know sees a big issue in doing what I did please tell.
    Of course playing with this Raw.plist file is at your own risks so keep backup and bee careful.
    The tweaking of this raw.plist file had been talked about in different forum in the past concerning the support of Canon 3xxD that had a different US name Rebel something. The change of name of the corresponding array added support before an OS update did it for everyone.

    I also modified my Raw.plist file to import RAW files from my Olympus C-5050Z. But that doesn't make Aperture import a type of RAW file it didn't support before. It just turns out that your Nikon 5400 RAW files are the same format as the Nikon 8400 files except for size, just as my Olympus C-5050 files are substantially similar to the Olympus C-7070 files. I think the Raw.plist file used by ImageIO contains hints on how to treat the data and color in the images and as long as the cameras don't behave too differently, substituting one model with another will work.
    The RAW.plist file is a standard plist file that can be examined and modified with the Property List Editor. What I would like to see is documentation of the parameters so that we can more easily add support for cameras that aren't supported out of the box.
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   2.16GHz 2GB RAM 256VRAM

  • LR 3.3 - Olympus E-5 Support for Raw-Format, Lens Correction Profiles for Zuiko Lenses

    Ich wish strongly Olympus E-5 Support for Raw-Format for Ligtroom 3.3,... and i wait since ages for Lens Correction Profiles of Zuiko Lenses ;-)) There are plenty of Olympus users who yearn for that :-)
    Will Release 3.3 support this?

    Hi,
    LR3.3 is released today, and it has support for Olympus E-5 added to it. Details of it can be found here;
    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/12/lightroom-3-3-and-camera-raw-6-3-now-avail able.html
    and the new version of LR3.3 can be downloaded here;
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html

  • Support for RAW format for Leica cameras

    Does anyone know when iPhoto might provide RAW support for the Leica D-LUX 3 digital camera?

    Larry, thx for the clarity. I didn't realize asking about future directions was a no-no here.
    I since found an Apple document indicating support for the Leica D-LUX 3 and RAW format in an OS 10.4.10(?) release. I think I'll have to drag my Mac to the camera store, take a few pics with the D-LUX 3, attempt to sync and see if/how the RAW images come over, and then advise here on if it worked with OS 10.5.2 and iPhoto '08.
    Peter

  • RAW Support for Samsung GX-1L

    Hi,
    I have a Samsung GX-1L which is basically a rebadged Pentax SLR
    The problem is the iPhoto 6.0.4 running on OSX 10.4.7 does not regognise the file format (PEF).
    OS X 10.4.7 is supposed to support the Pentax *ist DL RAW file format, so I would have assumed it would have had no problem with the Samsung?

    Hi there,
    iPhoto does not recognize every RAW image but it does surprise me that it won't see PEF's. I use Graphic Converter - it's a great almost 'free' App, check it out and it will open almost any RAW image including PEF's... Good luck, Rick
    iMac G5 iSight 20" - 30G iPOD in Slimming Black -   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   - HP Pav 15" WS and Toshiba Sat 17" WS LP's - Canon 20D & A620

  • HT203088 Any ideas when RAW support for the Nikon D7200 will be available?

    Hi
    I have recently bought the Nikon D7200. However Apple have not released their support for the RAW files. I am wondering what the likely timeframe is for support to be released? I do not want to make the switch to Adobe to get support and Nikons software isn't much fun at all so want to avoid that.
    In the meantime I am stuck using jpg...
    Any realistic timeframe estimates appreciated...
    James

    It used to be pretty quick with Nikons and Canons - some even before the camera was released! But now in the new Photos regime, we can't really say.

  • Needed Raw-Support for new Samsung SLRs like NX1000

    Hopefully Apple is updating his support for these new cameras (they are still a few month on the market).

    You better tell Apple directly: Apple - Aperture - Feedback
    Here Apple probably will not hear you.

  • New Camera Raw Update adds support for extra cameras

    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1072
    This update extends RAW image format compatibility to Aperture 3 and iPhoto '09 for the following cameras:
    Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
    Olympus E-PL1
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10
    Samsung NX10
    Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
    Sony Alpha NEX-3
    Sony Alpha NEX-5
    As always: Back up first
    Regards
    TD

    Hi,
    See if this answers your question:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1178283?tstart=0

  • New Camera Raw Update adds support for more cameras.

    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1072
    This update extends RAW image format compatibility to Aperture 3 and iPhoto '09 for the following cameras:
    Canon PowerShot SX1 IS
    Olympus E-PL1
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10
    Samsung NX10
    Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
    Sony Alpha NEX-3
    Sony Alpha NEX-5
    As always: Back up first
    Regards
    TD

    Hi,
    See if this answers your question:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1178283?tstart=0

  • Support for RAW Video and Image Sequences

    Being a stills photographer who moved into video some years back, I'm very interested in the direction Lightroom is going with regards to video support. I haven't tried it yet but I wondered if LR4 supports Red R3D files? And would it perhaps support other future RAW video formats from the likes of Canon and Sony? It would seem like the perfect application, perhaps intergrating with Premiere in a similar way to RedCine with FCP. Be great to be able to log footage, orginize it into bins and do basic colour correction in LR, edit the project in Premiere and re-touch in After Effects.
    Another task LR would seem ideally suited to is combining image sequences into timelapse video. Shooting timelapse as an image sequence on a DSLR is pretty much standard practice these days; and I've used LR to colour correct, crop and scale my sequences (before fitting them together in Quicktime) for years now. It would be fantastic to be able to preview the clip and export the video (as DPX, ProRes or DNxHD) from within Lightroom.
    These are obviously fairly long term wishes. In the short term though, the video features are pretty much useless to me without support for exporting ProRes and DNxHD files. With this LR becomes a powerful asset manager that could be used to collect together footage from multiple sources/codecs and transcode it all for editing. As mentioned in a previous thred, XML support would make it even more useful in this context. There is definitly a gap in the market for an application than can handle this kind of task well.
    With other manufactures floundering or neglecting their professional user base, Adobe would seem poised to take the video post crown. I wonder if Lightroom could be part of the takeover?

    As I understand it Andy, its intention is to remain a photographers program, not a videographers program.  The basic video features are available for lightweight management of videos coming from digital cameras, but it's not going too much further than that at this point in time.  Of course that may change in the future, but we'll all have to wait and see on that one.

  • Lost camera raw support for canon 1ds markI in mountain lion

    I seem to have lost system support for camera raw files for the original Canon 1ds (what you might call the markI). There's been two recent raw support updates, and I'm not sure if it occured with the first for those two updates or with update to Mountain Lion itself (which I recently clean-installed). I noticed it after the first raw support update (Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 4.01) but it could have happend with Mountain Lion install and I just didn't notice. In any case, I definitely don't have support for the camera raw files, finder shows only the generic TIFF icon thumnail (the raw files from the markI 1ds were of the extension .TIF, before canon moved on to .cr2 format..). Preview and Aperture can preview the file but without any custom white balance or other info stored with the raw file from camera.
    Anybody else experience this or know fix?
    Thanks!
    For anyone wanting and willing to test on their machine, I'll post a link to a test raw file.... hmm, apparently this support forum does not allow for the linclusion of a link to an image file, but I'll see if it allows for a link to a zipped folder with image inside... I suppose I wouldn't download a .zip file myself but for anyone braver than I:
    http://laglj.com/2012hirez/1dsTestFile.zip
    Thanks,
    Lane
    laglj.com

    Lane,
    That latest raw update also shows supported devices. The EOS-1Ds is still shown as supported by Mountain Lion in the knowledge base article that accompanies it. Bump!
    I wonder if using Disk Utility and verify/fix permissions may restore your RAW capability.
    Don't have Aperture or Lightroom.
    I installed the recent raw updates into 10.8.2. The DB5W2360.TIF file has a generic Preview icon. Graphic Converter 8.3.1 opens .cr2 files, and it opened this TIF file nicely as well. GC is willing to modify white balance with a condition that it cannot be done in place, and must be exported to a different format.
    Not much help, I know.

Maybe you are looking for