HT5731 why is apple tv better than netflix?

why is apple tv better than netflix?

Hi s13579,
Welcome to the Support Communities!
The following information will explain what the Apple TV is. Netflix is one of the services available on the Apple TV.
Apple - Apple TV - HD iTunes content and more on your TV.
http://www.apple.com/appletv/
Apple - Apple TV - Access iTunes, Netflix, and more on your HDTV.
http://www.apple.com/appletv/whats-on/
Watch everything from classics to recent Hollywood blockbusters to original programming like House of Cards and Orange Is the New Black.5 Apple TV organizes the huge catalog of streaming titles from Netflix so you can find what you want fast.
I hope this information helps ....
Happy Holidays!
- Judy

Similar Messages

Why my apple tv say that netflix is not available

why my apple tv say that netflix is not available. I used to watch netflix, but just today ...

Power cycle the ATV and router.

Why does apple charge more than it is mentioned in the game at the time you buy

why does apple charge more than it is mentioned in the game at the time you buy?

yes without any details and its not first time, i am always suprised to see the actual price and price i pay, well could be tax but should it be not mentioned which helps people understand.

Why is hyper-v better than virtualbox?

We have 4-5 people in a software development environment with access to 4 servers, each with 2 quad-core or dual-core cpu's (core-based, before nehalem), and 8gb or 16gb RAM, so I think we have a good amount of power for virtualization. Total, we have a
team foundation server, oracle server, web server, 2 virtualization servers, and multiple workstations, some virtualized, some not.
When we started virtualizing about a year ago, for whatever reason, and although everyone has an MSDN sub, we started using VirtualBox instead of Hyper-V. I'm no expert (and that's why I'm here) but I think they operate at different levels of interaction
with the hardware, and that VirtualBox is a bad idea for this environment.
Can someone give some good reasons why we should be using Hyper-V? Also is it possible to convert the virtual machines?
And then I would like to know if it's okay to also be virtualizing our web server and oracle server, etc. We have only been virtualizing workstations. I think we really need to make good use of virtualization if we are going to be doing it at all.
Advice welcome also for virtualization best practices, backups, management, infrastructure design, etc. I would like to start with a domain controller, and maybe a Lync server so we can share desktops, etc. Thanks for all input!

In my opinion Hyper-V is only better if your using Hyper-V to host servers, like Microsoft SharePoint, Active Directory, Sql Server, or even MySql to provide resources.
If you intend to be using Virtualizatio to develop software, like Working with SharePoint from a developer standpoint, building asp.net web applications, or even doing C++, desktop applications, or Android, Php etc, if you are going to be physically on the
VM using it as your environment to write code and design, then Oracle VirtualBox is better than Hyper-V.
With hyper-v your limited to using The Connect console, or Remote Desktop Protocol to see the virtual machine. The RDP console leaves much to be desired. It only gives you the option to use all of your monitors or one, it won't do 2 if you have
3. I like to use my third monitor to keep my email open, and pdf documentation, or word documents and use the other two monitors for my VM so I can see multiple code windows in Visual Studio at the same time (VS2010). Oracle handles multi monitors
so much better. And if I want to surface an adroid phone through USB to my VM, oracle is the only way to go there, or maybe VMWare, but VirtualBox is free.
However, Hyper-V is now native to Windows 8 desktop version and windows 8 server version. And most companies dealing with microsoft products use Hyper-V for their VM's, so from a multi developer environment, it makes sense for us to use Hyper-V with
windows 8 because all of our servers run on Hyper-V. If we need to troubleshoot something we can grab a copy of the latest server VM backup and spin it up locally on Hyper-V with windows 8 without having to do any conversions.
But from a developer standpoint it is really hard for me to leave VirtualBox. If RDP could work my 2 of my monitors and not all 3 or 4 of them I would have no complaints. Third part RDP sofware isn't any better, it could never compare to the
deep integration and speed of windows RDP. My main issue is, if RDP can do all of my monitors why can't it do just 2 of them, seems like a big thing to leave out in my opinion, it's so frustrating. It's such an awesome part of windows with such
a huge annoying handicap. I've actually thought about just having another computer for my third monitor, like a tablet or something on a stand. Sure you can SPAN a monitor in Windows so it acts like one monitor and I can tell RDP to go full screen
but it has a width limit and then I need extra software on the VM to handle the big resolution like 2 screens instead of one.
My Blog: http://www.thesug.org/Blogs/ryan_mann1/default.aspx Website: Under Construction

Why SAP ERP is Better than ORACLE ERP?????

Hi expert I need some help about the comparison study between SAP and Oracle.
One of our WOOD plantation Client have some confusion between two ERP packages.Oracle have approached them . So how can we convince them to do SAP ERP. If you have some ppt or any material please send it to me . Its urgent.
Another thing that how SAP FI is better than Oracle FI for any Wood Plantation Company.
If you gyes have any win story over Wood Plantation company then please give it to me.
Thnaks Experts for your kind Considuration

Dear Pratik,
You can find the points for your presentation from the link:
http://searchoracle.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid41_gci1173173,00.html#
Well, you need to convince your client that ERP is not all about cost of implementation. There are many other areas that you need to look at - availabilty of trained staff - complexity of business processes - does your existing data/processes map into one better than the other - are you happy going Oracle Oracle or would you prefer SAP with some other database.
You can add that the majority of transactions in vanilla Oracle are more difficult than in SAP. SAP can be configured to support most of the business processes without coding.
Let me know in case of any specific queries.
Regards,
Rakesh

Why is LR5 catalog better than PSE 12 Organiser?

Hi/
I have started using a trial version of LR5.
I have been a regular user of various versions of PSE over the years.
Generally, I have been happy with the organiser, & have various tags nested in each-other.
I have never had a problem with it being unstable, & can normally find what I am looking for,
(provided that I have correctly tagged it in the first place :-)
My first impression of the LR5 catalogue is that it is not as intuitive.
I have searched on-line for how to set-up the catalogue & much of the discussion relates to how many catalogues to have. - I've already made that decision - Just the one:
So? What features am I missing in the LR5 catalogue that make it better than the Elements Organiser?
What do you think?

I am also a happy user of the Organizer, but I also use LR 4.4.
What I find interesting in LR:
- huge amount of possible customization and options (if you need them...)
- Ability to manage jpegs just as raws (the organizer does not let you open jpegs in acr, )
- Smart ways to manage variants without copying files (virtual copies)
- More advanced metadata management
- possibility to merge catalogs
- Much more support by Adobe and user forums
- More advanced options in output in the latest versions
What can be debated is the difficulty of the learning curve as well as the 'robustness' of the software. The organizer was plagued with many bugs (it was already there many years before LR.) The problem is that having many more options makes LR much more complex. For instance the database has three times the number of tables. The result is that the LR forums are full of complaints about bugs or missing features... just because it is too rich and tries to satisfy everybody's needs.
Many cases of problems with the Organizer are related to the backup function which backs up both pictures and catalogs. Lr only backup catalogs. Backing up pictures is your responsability. If you have problems, it's not LR's fault, it's yours .
I can't find a post I made to show the possible advantages of the organizer, but that was just for the fun.

Are Apple routers better than others?

I have wi-fi at my home and I have problems with AirPlay as it sometimes skips.
I'm thinking of buying Time Capsule and I want to know if it's powerfull enough to work in a normal size house and will it solve AirPlay problem?
Is wi-fi on Time Capsule better than on Motorola VIP1003 router?

The broadcast power of all routers is limited by law. Every manufacturer is running their products at 100%, so there will be very little difference between routers of different manufacturers.
If you have having difficulty now, replacing your router with a Time Capsule will likely not solve your problems.
Instead, you will probably need to look for "extending" or "repeating" devices to provide a stronger signal throughout your house....whether you elect to add the Time Capsule or not.

Is apple TV better than Roku for Netflix?

Trying to buy one system to play movies with Netflix, and just got Roku. I was ondering if Apple TV does what Roku does better and then more (iTunes, etc)
Anybody has a recommendation about this?

With ATV you have access to iTunes rentals and TV shows purchases, Netflix, Youtube, Vimeo, Podcasts, Flickr, iTunes Match, some sports etc.
http://www.apple.com/appletv/
If you have an IOS device then you can use airplay or mirror (via iPad 2, iPhone 4S) for additional content.

Why iSO7 is not better than its predecessor ?

my iphone working real slow since upgread, why apple did not create bett

kula78 wrote:
it would be more approprite to take the customer feedback on apple website itself iSO 6 Vs iSO7 certainly I win - thanks alot for instant reply, am trying to be more constructive here, looking forward to see more improvements !!!
I think you misunderstand the purpose of this site. This is a user-to-user technical support forum. Apple rarely participates here. Your opinion is no more or less important than mine or anyone elses. No one here is required to agree with you or act on your opinion. You've been given your technical support options.
If you want to submit feedback to Apple, use the Feedback page:
http://www.apple.com/feedback

Why are two queries better than one

I'm trying to help out our developers who are struggling with the performance of a very simple select statmenent that for some reason is exhibiting some very inexplicable results.
I'll show the SQL as a single statement first.....
select * from transaction1 t where t.hid in (select distinct h.hid from history1 h,filter1 f where h.fid = f.fid and f.match='value');
transaction 1 has 250k records, history1 has about 100k as does filter1. We know generally the subselect will only return a total of half a dozen or less records (only 1 in our testing here).
Running the above query takes around 7 seconds.
Changing this to a with clause.....
WITH a as (select distinct h.hid from history1 h,filter1 f where h.fid = f.fid and f.match='value') select * from transaction1 t where t,hid in (select a.hid from a);
and the runtime drops to 3 seconds. But then re-running the first statement again also now takes 3 seconds (so I guess there's some caching going on there).
Now what really puzzles is if we split this into two queries.....
select distinct h.hid from history1 h,filter1 f where h.fid = f.fid and f.match='value';
This takes .1 of a second,
select * from transaction1 t where t.hid in (12345);
And this takes .1 of a second.
So why when run seperately are they so fast, yet combined they take so long. I'm a bit baffled by this. We've rewritten the same SQL in half a dozen different ways with the same result and also done the same thing with other tables as well. Is it an optimisation issue?

Appologies for not following protocol, my first time posting on here.
Oracle 10g clustered.
We have limited access as it's a customers server, but the explain plan comes back as....
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 898894568
| Id | Operation            | Name              | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|Time     |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                   | 49553 |    37M| 7075   (2)|00:01:25 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI|                   | 49553 |    37M| 7075   (2)|00:01:25 |
|   2 |   VIEW               | VW_NSO_1          | 26131 |   331K|   476   (4)|00:00:06 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN         |                   | 26131 |   791K|   476   (4)|00:00:06 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| FILTER1           | 26131 |   484K|   246   (4)|00:00:03 |
|   5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| HISTORY1          |   104K| 1225K|   227   (3)|00:00:03 |
|   6 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | TRANSACTION1      |   199K|   150M| 6593   (1)|00:01:20 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - access("T"."TID"="$nso_col_1")
   3 - access("H"."HID"="F"."ID")
   4 - filter("F"."MATCH"='value')
20 rows selectedI'll admit, I'm not completely clear on what I'm reading here, other than the fact there are some big differences in the timing values
We don't have privaleges to run trace, so I'm a bit stuffed there as I'm on the clients site, however I will get my developers to try this on our local server.
Edited by: user1410957 on 15-Sep-2009 06:14

Is an apple mouse better than an ordinary mouse

Is it better to buy an apple mouse or to buy a normal pc mouse

It's a matter of preference. I like the Magic Mouse for the additional gestures that Lion gives it.
Regards,
Captfred

Is apple mail better than outlook

That is the question I'd like answered please? I am a student and will be installing office for mac but I'd like to know which is the better of the 2 email clients i.e.. Outlook or Apples built in client? I am asking this because I have an iPhone, iPad and MBP so I want iCloud to work between them all

The answer to that question is very subjective and difficult to answer but I can share some incite based on my own experience. Ultimately the best way to judge is to try them both and see which one you prefer. A couple of thing to keep in mind.
Apple Mail is a better app if you are connecting to mail servers that use the IMAP protocol like iCloud mail, Google Gmail or Yahoo mail whereas Outlook is better if you are connecting to servers that use Microsoft's ActiveSync like an Exchange server.
Outlook integrates contacts and calendar functionality which also work best with ActiveSync servers. On the Mac Contacts and Calendars are handled by separate apps that use the open CalDAV and CardDAV protocols that are used by iCloud and Gmail.
Outlook stores its mail, contacts and calendar data in one large file whereas Apple Mail stores each email as a separate file. If you use Time Machine for backups backing up the Outlook database takes up a lot more room because the entire database file needs to be backed up whereas as with Apple Mail only the new emails files need to be backed taking up very little room in a Time Machine backup.
Ultimately, if you are going to use iCloud for mail, contacts and calendar your will be better served by Apple's apps. If you are connecting to mail, contact and calendar servers that use Microsoft's ActiveSync then Outlook might serve you better.

How is Apple display better than Samsung?

I am looking at buying a Samsung 23" monitor to hook up to my MacBook pro--I would get an Apple Cinema display but they seem to cost 3 times as much--what are the main differences in quality?

The 23" Samsung most likely uses what is called a TN LCD panel. TN panels are the same kind as used in virtually all notebook computers, including Apple's. TN panels are generally very sensitive to viewing angle. If you own a Mac notebook, or a PC notebook, perhaps you have noticed that tilting the lid/display can have a big affect on the colors you see.
Apple uses a premium LCD panel in their monitors based on a technology called IPS. IPS LCD panels cost more to make, though not three times. Nevertheless, if you really care about color and do color critical work, you should consider an Apple. The Apple will be better in nearly every way, you just need to decide for yourself if it's worth the added expense.

Why HCM Extracts is better than HCM BI Report?

Hi All,
I have simple question that why we use HCM extracts at time extracting data from HCM?
any suggestion will be helpful to me.
Thanks & Regards,
Shramistha

Hi Shramshitha,
The main difference is that using HCM extract you can prepare changes only reports, but you cant do the same in BI unless you have access to database.
Thanks,
Vinod

Why is Private Browsing better than just clearing History daily?

I heard that you should do your online banking and other financial activities in Private Browsing mode. I always clear history when I turn off the computer anyway. And getting the Private Browsing to accept my previously bookmarked locations has been unsuccessful. I can re-bookmark from Private Browsing, of course. But I just wondered if this is really necessary, or more for folks with computers on networks, or shared computers?
You may not get at my computer--troubleshooting information. I'm using Windows 7 operating system and the latest version of Mozilla Firefox.

You aren't on the latest version of Firefox, please update to Firefox 22 [[Update Firefox to the latest version]] (you are on Firefox 21).
There is no real difference between using Private Browsing and clearing your history everyday, it's just personal preference around workflows.

HT5731 why is apple tv better than netflix?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for