HTTP Queue for EOIO

Hi All:
Few days back I raise a request (forum) regarding HTTP queue creation for QoS = EOIO. I spent much time on SDN just to find any hint how to create a Queue from HTTP url(Sender).
Error I was getting <b>"INTERNAL.ATTRIBUTE_INITIAL" for "QUEUE_NAME".</b>
At last I come to know that it was a bugg in XI and due to which queue was not created. Please
refer a SAP Note: 1073448(it is created just 4 days back) - Plain HTTP adapter: Queue ID is not accepted.
This is just to share little information from my side.
Thanks
Farooq.

This issue has ben solved. SA Provided a patch for NetWeaver 2004s SP11....
Prasad M

Similar Messages

HTTP Sender with EOIO leads to HTTP Response 500

Hello everybody,
since we are using SP12 we have problems with the HTTP sender when using EOIO. If I use the two parameters ....qos=EOIO&queueid=myQueue... I got a HTTP Reponse Code 500: Internal Server Error in the sender system (for the test I use a Java Program). When I use the qos EO (without a queue ID) it works.
Does anybody now this problem?
Regards,
Thomas

Have u seen this
HTTP Queue for EOIO
Also have a look here SAP Notes 804124, 807000
Regards,
Prateek

Configuration for Queue Prioritization for EOIO Queues

Hi,
Please can anybody help me in configuring the queue prioritization for EOIO Queues.
Regards
Srinivas

hi,
Check these help..
Eo/EOIO?BE - Queue - ? - /people/sap.india5/blog/2006/01/03/xi-asynchronous-message-processing-understanding-xi-queues-part-i
Please go through these links
/people/sap.india5/blog/2006/01/03/xi-asynchronous-message-processing-understanding-xi-queues-part-i
For queues in message mapping
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/06/09/introduction-to-queues-in-message-mapping
Here are the Queues for Asynchronous Message Processing
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/7b/94553b4d53273de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f078394a-4469-2910-c4bf-853c75674694
Thanks,
Vijaya.

PI to ECC via ABAP Proxy - Outbound Queue for HTTP

Dear Experts,
Is there any Outbound Queue for HTTP?
I've a interface scenario where the receiver is SAP ECC and the receiver adapter XI ABAP proxy. As I see in the communication channel the transport protocol used is HTTP. So I think could there be an outbound queue to manage HTTP connection when PI send the data to SAP ECC?
Just like when we are sending IDocs to ECC via tRFC, we could check if the IDoc has really been sent to ECC by checking in tcode SM58 (Outbound tRFC).
In case for ABAP Proxy via HTTP, is there any similar connection to SM58 (IDoc via tRFC)?
Thank you,
Suwandi C.

Hi Kandasami,
Thank you for the reply. I will check for it.
Hi Jens,
Yes, I mean somewhere after the SXMB_MONI in PI and before SXMB_MONI in ECC, is there any queue in between those two?
Thank you,
Suwandi C.

How to configure a error queue for weblogic jms topic

Hi guys.
I want to configure a error queue for weblogic jms topic. Wanted: The message goes to error destination when messages have expired or reached their redelivery limit.
1. using jms transport configure proxy service:
Retry Count :3
Retry Interval:10
Error Destination: ErrorTopic
Expiration Policy: Redirect
I tried use the proxy service to consume message from the jms topic . and generation an error in the proxy message flow. But the message didn't goes into the error topic.
Any suggestions for this topic? Can anyone provide some helps or any useful links.
Thanks in advance.
Mingzhuang

Mingzhuang
I want to configure a error queue for weblogic jms topic. Wanted: The message goes to error destination when messages have expired or reached their redelivery limit.
1. using jms transport configure proxy service:
Retry Count :3
Retry Interval:10
Error Destination: ErrorTopic
Expiration olicy: RedirectUnlike File/SFTP, JMS proxy service definition does not have the concept of Error Destination. To accomplish similar functionality go to JMSQ on (for which proxy is configured) server console (http://localhost:7001/console) and configure the Error Destination. Following URL will help in how to configure JMS Q.
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/ConsoleHelp/taskhelp/jms_modules/queues/ConfigureQueues.html
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/ConsoleHelp/taskhelp/jms_modules/queues/ConfigureQueueDeliveryFailure.html
I tried use the proxy service to consume message from the jms topic . and generation an error in the proxy message flow. But the message didn't goes into the error topic.If every thing is configured as per above step, then the after retries, the weblogic server will put the message into JMS topic configured. Your proxy will receive from this topic.
Let me know if we are not on same page.
Cheers
Manoj

Attachments still getting queued for a long time

Others have probably observed as well that after the forum upgrade, attachments are still getting queued for a long time, e.g. the attachment in this post has been queued for almost two hours:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/433930?tstart=0
(The attachment posted 9:56 AM PDT, it's now 11:49 AM PDT.)
Is there an ETA on a fix for this? If it's going to be awhile, can attachments just be disabled until it's fixed?

In lieu of working attachments, I prefer recommending www.pixentral.com, for a couple of reasons:
- The camera icon is limited to 2 MB, while Pixentral has a larger limit. For the metadata issues I often address, I of course want to see the original. And not only is it inconvenient for the original poster to resize the image to upload it, but many Photoshop Elements users have difficulty resizing the pixel dimensions of photos.
- When a 2 MB image is inserted with the camera icon, the Jive software inserts a link to the original 2 MB image and relies on browser-side image resizing, slowing down everyone's page downloads. For an example:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/2000474#2000474
Here's the HTML:
<a href="http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/4336/skin91.jpg">
<img alt="skin91.jpg" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick=""
src="http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/4336/skin91.jpg" width="620"/>
</a>
The SRC URL refers to the full 2 MB image.

Long queue for unidentified mails/ domains

friends i was checking my queue for ex 2013 and i found loads of emails blocking my queue. we dont use these domains neither anyone from us connects to them.. they look some face domains.. can you guys please provide some info.
please check below screen shot. I am not sure from where these are coming .. what should i check. and how can i remove as when i am removing this by right clicking one of the msg it says it will be removed but stays there. please advise
*** below image is also available on this link https://www.dropbox.com/s/af0lto7dat6sh83/Error.png?dl=0
Thanks, Happiness Always
Jatin
Skype: jatider2jatin, Email: [email protected]

Hi ,
Please have a look in to the message tracking logs.
From the logs i came to know that the sender "[email protected]" is trying to send an email to the non existing recipient "[email protected]" in your exchange organisation.Due to that email get failed and your post master address
is sending an non-deliver report to the sender address "[email protected]" because of that messages are getting queued on your exchange server.
On the below logs the non-existing recipient address is [email protected] likewise they can generate lot of emails to non-existing email address in your exchange organisation.So on such case finally we would be having large queue which contains
the non-delivery report to the unknown sender address.
Note : Really sorry , I am not aware of smse .But as i said earlier You need to enable the equivalent option on the smarthost which you are having in your environment.
Logs :
RunspaceId : 4553bf75-e032-477c-be5b-effc5d901e90
Timestamp : 19-Jan-15 12:38:06 PM
ClientIp : 192.168.0.14
ClientHostname : SVBHEMS02.bhumishq.local
ServerIp : 192.168.0.14
ServerHostname : svbhems02
SourceContext : 08D201DA53EAEF86;2015-01-19T08:37:43.506Z;0
ConnectorId : SVBHEMS02\Default SVBHEMS02
Source : SMTP
EventId : RECEIVE
InternalMessageId : 38487201939500
MessageId : <0577B-26357849-09580778-2015.01.19-08.59.19-Scott1966#[email protected]
le.net>
Recipients : {[email protected]}
RecipientStatus : {}
TotalBytes : 3503
RecipientCount : 1
RelatedRecipientAddress :
Reference :
MessageSubject : Hi, my dear friend!
Sender : [email protected]
ReturnPath : [email protected]
Directionality : Incoming
TenantId :
OriginalClientIp : 216.146.33.62
MessageInfo : 0cA:
MessageLatency :
MessageLatencyType : None
EventData : {[FirstForestHop, SVBHEMS02.bhumishq.local], [ProxiedClientIPAddress, 216.146.33.62],
[ProxiedClientHostname, mail-23-ewr.dyndns.com], [ProxyHop1,
SVBHEMS02.bhumishq.local(10.10.20.4)], [DeliveryPriority, Normal]}
RunspaceId : 4553bf75-e032-477c-be5b-effc5d901e90
Timestamp : 19-Jan-15 12:38:35 PM
ClientIp :
ClientHostname : svbhems02
ServerIp :
ServerHostname :
SourceContext :
ConnectorId :
Source : ROUTING
EventId : FAIL
InternalMessageId : 38487201939500
MessageId : <0577B-26357849-09580778-2015.01.19-08.59.19-Scott1966#[email protected]
le.net>
Recipients : {[email protected]}
RecipientStatus : {[{LRT=};{LED=550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found};{FQDN=};{IP=}]}
TotalBytes : 3707
RecipientCount : 1
RelatedRecipientAddress :
Reference : {<[email protected]>}
MessageSubject : Hi, my dear friend!
Sender : [email protected]
ReturnPath : [email protected]
Directionality : Incoming
TenantId :
OriginalClientIp :
MessageInfo :
MessageLatency :
MessageLatencyType : None
EventData : {[DeliveryPriority, Normal]}
RunspaceId : 4553bf75-e032-477c-be5b-effc5d901e90
Timestamp : 19-Jan-15 12:38:35 PM
ClientIp :
ClientHostname :
ServerIp :
ServerHostname : svbhems02
SourceContext : Failure
ConnectorId :
Source : DSN
EventId : DSN
InternalMessageId : 38487201939504
MessageId : <[email protected]>
Recipients : {[email protected]}
RecipientStatus : {}
TotalBytes : 8666
RecipientCount : 1
RelatedRecipientAddress :
Reference : {<0577B-26357849-09580778-2015.01.19-08.59.19-Scott1966#[email protected]
ble.net>}
MessageSubject : Undeliverable: Hi, my dear friend!
Sender : [email protected]
ReturnPath : <>
Directionality : Originating
TenantId :
OriginalClientIp :
MessageInfo :
MessageLatency :
MessageLatencyType : None
EventData : {[DeliveryPriority, Normal], [OriginalFromAddress, [email protected]]}
Thanks & Regards S.Nithyanandham

Transport-Leave Transport request in queue for Later import

Dears,
I want that U0 mode i.e. Leave Transport request in queue for Later import should always be selected by default while importing any transport.
Please suggest,How it can be done.
Shivam

Shivam,
Please check the attached link.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3d/ad5b814ebc11d182bf0000e829fbfe/content.htm]
Sample Syntax
tp import T11k904711 P11 U0
Hope this helps.
Manoj
Edited by: Manoj Chintawar on Mar 20, 2009 11:55 AM

RF Queue for a specific Shipping Point ...... Is it possibe?

Hi,
We have around 10 doors and 10 shipping points. Transfer orders created for all the outbound deliveries are directed to an RF queue for picking.
Now, we have a specific Shipping Point which we want to seperate out for picking and we want the transfer orders to go to a different queue.
How can this be achieved?
Few clues which might work out are :
1) If we can somehow link that shipping point to a door, then we can create a queue for that door. But how can we link a shipping point to a door?
2) If we create a new storage type and direct our picking to the new storage type. Is it possible? how?
Any other suggestions are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
-Mike

It is http://server:port/reports/rwservlet/showmyjobs.
I have a pull-down (mmb) menu item that does the following. We're using Single Sign-on; not sure how this would need to be modified without SSO.
WEB.show_document(:GLOBAL.report_server_url||'/showmyjobs','_blank');

Lock Queue for a particular Partner No.

Hi All,
We want to lock the RFC queue for a particaular partner No. is this possible in SAP?
Background : We are having a maintainace activity on one of our middle ware, hence there would be changes done to a particular and critical interface. The middle ware team has requested that they should not receive any IDOCs during this time but as the activity is for a substantially high time, we cannot stop the batch which generates the critical Idocs during time as the critical IDOCs can be generated only for N and N-1 day only (Activity may last for 3-5 days depending on the outcome). We would want to lock the queue for a particular Partner No. so that once these IDOCs are generated they can be waiting in queue untill the queue is released and the target system has all the IDOCs required by the time the system is handed over to the bussiness.
P.S : We are transfering IDOC through TRFC call to the target system.
Can you please suggest?
Regards,
Anand.

Hi Anand,
As per SAP documentation
Creating an Outbound Partner Profile (SAP Library - IDoc Interface/Electronic Data Interchange)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b7f5643d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/content.htm
When you assign a port number for IDOC partner profile, this port number is mapped to a RFC destination.
Either you can hash out port <-> RFC destination mapping or hash out the RFC destination host mentioned in SM59.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

Exchange 2010 - PerfMon - Messages Queued for Delivery = 2,147,483,649

Our monitoring system is alerting Messages Queued for Delivery as 2 Billion messages and the value returned by PerfMon > MSExchangeTransport Queues > Messages Queued for Delivery also matches this number during some samples.
I was wondering, what's going on here. When checking queues using Get-Queue cmdlet it doesn't show more than couple of messages in the queue.
How do I get this fixed? This seems to be a known issue from thread http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ac121f02-4359-4d18-b86a-9c9c78b320a9/perfmon-messages-queued-for-delivery-2147483764?forum=exchange2010
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Hi ChaituNanl,
Thank you for your question.
By our search, I suggest we update Exchange to Exchange 2010 CU6 or later, because problem also seem to appear to Exchange CU5 or former.
We could download the CU by the following link:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/240.exchange-server-and-update-rollups-build-numbers.aspx
Notice: please note the version of Exchange Service Pack
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim

Specific queue for one Scenario.

Hi guys,
Im using an RFC interface to connect an R/3 to XI. I would like to use only one specific queue for this scenario. Is it possible specifying a specific queue? Where I can define it?
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo.

Hi Ricardo,
you can do this using
Configure Filter for Queue Prioritization in SXMB_ADM Transaction
For more refer to
<a href="/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/12/12/how-to-prioritize-messages-in-xi:///people/sap.user72/blog/2005/12/12/how-to-prioritize-messages-in-xi
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/59e837d3-0201-0010-c096-dc1869733413">https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/59e837d3-0201-0010-c096-dc1869733413</a>
Regards,
Sudharshan

Specify a XI queue for processing ?

Hi,
I would like to specify clearly a queue for a specific outbound Message Interface. For instance :
Queue_1   for all MessageInterface_4
Queue_2   for all MessageInterface_5
Queue_3   for all MessageInterface_6
By this way, I will be sure that all messages of "MessageInterface_4" sent every 10min will be processed by the same Queue "Queue_1".
Thus if a queue is in status "Stopped", that's means that only one interface will be affected.
Note: I use mainly adapter JDBC, IDoc, Abap proxy in Asynchronous mode EOIO.
Note: Another way is perhaps serialization, but I'm not sure that's possible with XML message inside XI.
Thanks
Mickael
P.S: I know well document "How to Priorize XI messages on IS - NW2004S.pdf"

Hi,
As its mentioned in above one of the post
You could arrange the queue for IDOC with
1. Create a function module, which will be used to indicate QueueID for the IDoc type.
2. Import parameters: CONTROL of type EDIDC & Export parameter: NAME of type CHAR16
3. Tables: DATA of type EDID4 In the body of source code, simply specify the QueueID with one line of code.
Note that it must match with the QueueID specified in IDXQUEUE table in your XI system.
For JDBC to be serialized
"Database Transaction Level" Setting as serializable:
Most restrictive isolation level. When it's used, the phantom values cannot occur. It prevents other users from updating or inserting rows into the data set until the transaction will be completed.Phantom behavior occurs when a transaction attempts to select a row that does not exist and a second transaction inserts the row before the first transaction finishes. If the row is inserted, the row appears as a phantom to the first transaction, inconsistently appearing and disappearing.
You need to go through below link also
/people/yining.mao/blog/2006/09/13/tips-and-tutorial-for-sender-jdbc-adapter
Thanks
Swarup

Different Queues for each paper tray

Our customers wish to simply have to select a printer without selecting additional tray outputs (ok, it´s not myself , its a customer of mine, a lacy one).
Is there a way to add separate printer queues for each tray? E.g. "Printer Tray1 - white paper" and "Printer Tray2 - preprinted"...
Then the employees only have to select the one or other printer, the remaining process will be done automatically.
Thanks for your tipps.
Klaus

If you go to the CUPS web interface you can set the default paper tray/size etc for the printer:
http://127.0.0.1:631
Click the "Printers" section at the top of the page, scroll down to the printer you want to set up, then click "Configure printer" - you see all the options applicable to the printer.
I've used this to automate print routines, and it works perfectly.
Just set up multiple "virtual" printers for the same device with different settings for paper tray/size.
You will need to do this on the local machine, and have an admin password.

Execute queue for EJB

Hi,
We are working with weblogic 8.1. We have configured one Execute Queue for our
EJB, and modified deployment desriptor weblogic-ejb-jar.xml using this queue.
In our application we are using scheduler program(Quartz) to invoke this EJB,
but the calls are not going in to this Execute queue, instead it goes to the default
queue.
But when i call EJB method from other client(different VM), calls goes through
the execute queue.
For your information, we haven't modified <enable-call-by-reference> tag, which
means this option is set to default value false.
Please let me know if i am missing something?
Regards
Naresh

Hi,
To assign an EJB object to a configured execute queue, use the new dispatch-policy element in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml.
Ex : dispatch-policy>queue_name</dispatch-policy>
If no dispatch-policy is specified, or the specified dispatch-policy refers to a nonexistent server execute thread pool, then the server's default execute thread pool is used instead.
Go through the following links and find the information on this issue.
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/perform/AppTuning.html#1104273
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ejb/DDreference-ejb-jar.html#dispatch-policy
Regards
Anilkumar kari

HTTP Queue for EOIO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for