Httpd not processing php correctly

I have a weird issue with a Jooma CMS.
Mysqld is up, httpd is up, php is installed. I've updated php.ini to include the vhost directories.
The sites actually come up but they don't display perfectly. Joomla's header, sidebar menu, and several modules display perfectly. One of the news items is corrupt. Jumping to Joomlaboard, I can read perfectly but can't post.
Clearly, php is mostly working. I wouldn't see Joomla if it wasn't.
I originally thought the issue was a corrupted database so I restored from two different database backups. All copies of the database function identically.
The system was running perfectly on Ubuntu four days ago when I shut it down. I haven't formatted the drive that holds the mysql and web content. I just mounted them and pointed the respective servers to the old data.
This is weird. Any ideas? Any suggestions on where to start looking?
Last edited by TomB17 (2009-09-04 23:15:28)

Thank you for the reply.
Paths are identical. Oddly, most of the site renders properly but a couple of news items on the front page don't render and I can't post in the forums or read a thread.
At first, I thought the database was corrupt so I restored from two different backups taken on previous days. Each time, the result is the same.
If you want to see the behavior, have a look at the site http://www.CarlsonSpeed.com/.

Similar Messages

4250 appliance not processing packets correctly

Following are symptoms:
Starts with
errorMessage: name=errWarning ARP: bad operation from packet ###
Shortly after this we see events such Frag Too Small (1206)
And following this the following message appears repeatedly
errorMessage: name=errWarning Producer appears to be out of superblocks..consider configuring TCPReassemblyMode to loose FreeBlocks: 7
Following this there are missed packet count events (no other events) until the appliance is rebooted.
Any ideas on what could be causing this??

Version is 4.1(5) S201
CPU utilization is not through the roof. The sensors operate for some time, and then all start to experience the error roughly about the same time (within a few days of each other). All monitoring different networks with different load levels.
For more details, my TAC service request # is 602767977.

Error: The resource did not process correctly. How do I get rid of it?

I continue to receive an error everytime I log in to my college student email. The error says The resource did not process correctly. I desperately need help with this problem the error shows this as well java.lang.NullPointerException

Is that with Angel LMS from Blackboard?
That software doesn't seem to work with Firefox 7.
*http://helpdesk.oneonta.edu/xoops/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=167

Processing this item failed because of a PDF parser error. Input string was not in a correct format.

Good Morning,
We're having issues parsing several hundred PDF files located in two separate Record Center sites. All other PDF documents in the environment are being crawled and parsed without issue. I've verified the permissions for the Search service account, but that
doesn't seem to be the issue. Searching for this particular error hasn't returned much, but I have ensured that the Search service account has been added to the necessary Local Security Policy objects and cleared the configuration cache. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Processing this item failed because of a PDF parser error. ( Error parsing document 'https://asdf.com/sites/HRRecords/asdf.pdf'. Input string was not in a correct format.; ; SearchID = 6642FEEF-6921-434E-B084-02809173D8A7 )

This issue came back up for me as my results aren't displaying since this data is not part of the search index.
Curious if anyone knows of a way to increase the parser server memory in SharePoint 2013 search?
http://sharepoint/materials-ca/HPSActiveCDs/Votrevieprofessionnelleetvotrecarrireenregistrement.zip
Processing this item failed because the parser server ran out of memory. ( Error parsing document 'http://sharepoint/materials-ca/HPSActiveCDs/Votrevieprofessionnelleetvotrecarrireenregistrement.zip'. Document failed to be processed. It probably crashed the
server.; ; SearchID = 097AE4B0-9EB0-4AEC-AECE-AEFA631D4AA6 )
http://sharepoint/materials-ca/HPSActiveCDs/Travaillerauseindunequipemultignrationnelle.zip
Processing this item failed because of a IFilter parser error. ( Error parsing document 'http://sharepoint/materials-ca/HPSActiveCDs/Travaillerauseindunequipemultignrationnelle.zip'. Error loading IFilter for extension '.zip' (Error code is 0x80CB4204). The
function encountered an unknown error.; ; SearchID = 4A0C99B1-CF44-4C8B-A6FF-E42309F97B72 )

Firefox does not process paypaly continue_shopping links correctly.

firefox does not process paypaly continue_shopping links correctly. When you are at the paypal 'View Cart' and click on the continue shopping link it should take you back to the page you came from (this works in IE and Chrome) instead you end up on a 'sign in to PayPal page'
As far as I know this will happen on any page that is using PayPal add to cart buttons with a continue_shopping_url but you can see it on my own page below.
== URL of affected sites ==
http://amazingporcelain.com/beads.php

Very odd today it seems to work ok. I've tried it several times over the last week and each time it would do as described above. Today it works properly. Go Figure.

MIR6 not matching to correct PO number

Hi,
We have an issue (occasionally), when attempting to process parked documents. I am informed that this does not happen all the time, but is getting more and more frequent. We are using MIR6 to match deliveries to parked documents. I run my listing based on Vendor code and select the relevant parked document from the list. I enter the delivery note number in the correct field on the PO reference tab and hit enter. I get a list of 4 PO's (all different vendors), where the 2nd one in the list is the PO that I want. I highlight that line and enter. I then get an error message that states "currency entered differs from currency XXX in PO XXXXXXXXX", where the PO number given is the 1st one in the original list., not the 2nd that it should be.
I have searched to see if anyone else has encountered this and whether there is a SAP note that can correct this, but I cannot find anything. Can anyone help?
Kind regards
Jackie

When you need only PO numbers, link only the 3 tables to make your query simpler.
ap_invoice_distributions_all aida,
po_distributions_all pda,
po_headers_all poh
Only po based invoices will be selected for these tables

Certificate issues Active Directory Certificate Services could not process request 3699 due to an error: The revocation function was unable to check revocation because the revocation server was offline. 0x80092013

Hi,
We have some problems with our Root CA. I can se a lot of failed requests. with the event id 22: in the logs. The description is: Active Directory Certificate Services could not process request 3686 due to an error: The revocation function was unable to
check revocation because the revocation server was offline. 0x80092013 (-2146885613). The request was for CN=xxxxx.ourdomain.com. Additional information: Error Verifying Request Signature or Signing Certificate
A couple of months ago we decomissioned one of our old 2003 DCs and it looks like this server might have had something to do with the CA structure but I am not sure whether this was in use or not since I could find the role but I wasn't able to see any existing
configuration.
Let's say that this server was previously responsible for the certificates and was the server that should have revoked the old certs, what can I do know to try and correct the problem?
Thank you for your help
//Cris

hello,
let me recap first:
you see these errors on a ROOT CA. so it seems like the ROOT CA is also operating as an ISSUING CA. Some clients try to issue a new certificate from the ROOT CA and this fails with your error mentioned.
do you say that you had a PREVIOUS CA which you decomissioned, and you now have a brand NEW CA, that was built as a clean install? When you decommissioned the PREVIOUS CA, that was your design decision to don't bother with the current certificates that it
issued and which are still valid, right?
The error says, that the REQUEST signature cannot be validated. REQUESTs are signed either by itself (self-signed) or if they are renewal requests, they would be signed with the previous certificate which the client tries to renew. The self-signed REQUESTs
do not contain CRL paths at all.
So this implies to me as these requests that are failing are renewal requests. Renewal requests would contain CRL paths of the previous certificates that are nearing their expiration.
As there are many such REQUEST and failures, it probably means that the clients use AUTOENROLLMENT, which tries to renew their current, but shortly expiring, certificates during (by default) their last 6 weeks of lifetime.
As you decommissioned your PREVIOUS CA, it does not issue CRL anymore and the current certificates cannot be checked for validity.
Thus, if the renewal tries to renew them by using the NEW CA, your NEW CA cannot validate CRL of the PREVIOUS CA and will not issue new certificates.
But it would not issue new certificates anyway even if it was able to verify the PREVIOUS CA's CRL, as it seems your NEW CA is completely brand new, without being restored from the PREVIOUS CA's database. Right?
So simply don't bother :-) As long as it was your design to decommission the PREVIOUS CA without bothering with its already issued certificates.
The current certificates which autoenrollment tries to renew cannot be checked for validity. They will also slowly expire over the next 6 weeks or so. After that, autoenrollment will ask your NEW CA to issue a brand new certificate without trying to renew.
Just a clean self-signed REQUEST.
That will succeed.
You can also verify this by trying to issue a certificate on an affected machine manually from Certificates MMC.
ondrej.

IDOC is not processing in R/3 with status 64(Urgent)--Production issue.

Dear Folks,
Here we are implementing MIRROR sytem for data extraction in to BIW.
I had gone through the steps in PDF file(How to minimize down thime for Delta Initialization) which has given by SAP.
These are following steps I had performed in BW production
1. Using RSADMIN transcation- Assigned one user as a Debugging user.
2. With the Debugging user Created one infopackage on Purhcasing ITM datasource--
 In data selection tab, I given date as from 2002 to 2003
 In Update tab, I selected update mode as Initialize Delta process- without data transfer and Uncheck Update Data in master system immediately
 In schedule tab I selected option Start Data load immediately then Start extraction.
3.Data was requested and It was intialized properly with green status 1 from 1 Records.
4. In details tab Request, Extraction, transfer(IDOC and TRFC), Processing everything in Green color.
5.As per document I have checked in R/3 for IDOC with status 64 using transaction BD87/WE05
Problem is that IDOC is not processing in R/3 system. for that IDOC I have checked in BW montior screen using the option IDOC list in Source sytem, here also it is not showing any IDOCs.
Please let me know why BW sytem is not sending any IDOCs to source sytem.Is there any settings I could have miss in BW aswell as in R/3 system.
Note: In BW production I successfully loaded master data from R/3. aswell as I triggered infopackage-Initialization with data transfer, it is showing IDOC number properly in R/3 system.
Points is Assured for all replies.

Hi,
- check you RFC destination (normal test + authorization test)
- Check you partner profiles in WE20 and its ports WE21
- from the source system tree (RSA13) right click your source system and perform a check
- the best is to restore your source R/3 source system from BW (right click on it ans select RESTORE); you'll need to be able to log in the source system as an admin as well as opening the source system for customizing in SCC4 so that BW can recreate the correct partner parameters automatically; the best is to do that with your basis group.
hope this helps,
Olivier.

I do not have the correct version of the flash player, but when I follow the steps to download it, it still doesn't work in Firefox. (It does work in Internet Explorer)

Every time I click on a video icon, the response I get is that I cannot play the clip because I do not have the correct flashplayer. However, when I click to download it, nothing changes. I even tried disabling my security setting but it still did not work. Unfortunately, the troubleshooting help was too complicated for me to figure out. Is there something basic I can do to make firefox work? It does work on Internet explorer, so obviously the correct program is in my computer - it just won't work on firefox.

IE uses a different version of Flash than other browsers use.
1.Download the Flash setup file from here: 
[http://fpdownload.adobe.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player.exe Adobe Flash - Plugin version]. 
Save it to your Desktop. 
2. Close Firefox using File > Exit 
then check the Task Manager > Processes tab to make sure '''firefox.exe''' is closed, 
{XP: Ctrl+Alt+Del = Processes tab}
3. Then run the Flash setup file from your Desktop.

Import Server detects file in Ready folder but does not process

I have a problem where MDIS detects a file in the ready folder, but it does not launch the import:
2772 2008/10/22 23:37:52.240   1.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.001451 seconds.
2772 2008/10/22 23:38:23.428   1.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.001151 seconds.
2772 2008/10/22 23:38:54.678   1.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.006335 seconds.
2772 2008/10/22 23:39:25.897   1.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.011595 seconds.
2772 2008/10/22 23:39:57.272   1.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.003268 seconds.
2772 2008/10/22 23:40:28.507   1.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.006276 seconds.
The log file shows the above. You can see it detects the file is there, but since it does not launch the import it does not process the file or even move it to the exception or archive folders. I have confirmed settings in the MDIS.ini file, e.g. password, etc. I can import the same file using Import Manager without any errors.
Please help!

Hi Jitesh,
Your suggestion to try a different file type yielded positive reults. I created a simple tab delimited text file and import map and changed the existing Port from using XML based on the MATMAS05 schema to using the text file. The log shows:
6056 2008/10/23 17:32:34.066   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: ImportTask: Task started. Chunk size[50000], No. parallel chunks[5]
4572 2008/10/23 17:32:34.144   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: xStructuralTransformer: Thread started.
1160 2008/10/23 17:32:34.144   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: xValueTransformer: Thread started.
4192 2008/10/23 17:32:34.144   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: xImporter: Thread started.
4572 2008/10/23 17:32:34.144   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: xStructuralTransformer: Thread finished; Start -> End: 0.000000000 seconds.
1160 2008/10/23 17:32:34.160   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: xValueTransformer: Thread finished; Start -> End: 0.000000000 seconds.
4192 2008/10/23 17:32:34.660   Repository Load Successful. [JAN Master]: Delta: 0.085377 seconds.
4192 2008/10/23 17:32:35.958   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: xImporter: Thread finished; Start -> End: 1.000000000 seconds.
6056 2008/10/23 17:32:36.458   [MDS=ROBLB2K1H2J Repos=JAN Master ClientSystem=U2K2_MDM Port=Materials_from_U2K2_MDM]: ImportTask: Task finished. Chunk size[50000], No. parallel chunks[5]
4192 2008/10/23 17:34:11.133   22355-3-1-10-23-08-06-32-57_081023-063303_999.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.006444 seconds.
4192 2008/10/23 17:34:11.242   Repository Load Successful. [JAN Master]: Delta: 0.028803 seconds.
4572 2008/10/23 17:34:43.825   22355-3-1-10-23-08-06-32-57_081023-063303_999.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.003005 seconds.
4572 2008/10/23 17:35:16.018   22355-3-1-10-23-08-06-32-57_081023-063303_999.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.010113 seconds.
4572 2008/10/23 17:35:47.742   22355-3-1-10-23-08-06-32-57_081023-063303_999.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.001994 seconds.
4572 2008/10/23 17:36:19.419   22355-3-1-10-23-08-06-32-57_081023-063303_999.xml
Source file retrieval: Delta: 0.012413 seconds.
The text file was immediately picked up and imported. This thus proves that (1) MDIS is functioning, (2) user / password is correct. Unfortunately you will also see from the log above that when I changed the port back to run on XML the problem has not been resolved.
Any ideas?

Per-service SID's are not being granted correct permissions

Hi,
I had posted this here :
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/770984/per-service-sid-s-are-not-being-granted-correct-permissions, but no response as yet.
When installing SQL 2012 (on a VMWare VM), based on the following article :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504(v=sql.110), I have noticed that the SQL per service SIDs are not being granted the correct permissions. From the initial install, the following is what was observed (the red x's being permissions that
should have been granted but were not).
When re-installing and changing from specifying a domain account, to the default values, during set-up, the 4 service SIDs that were not added to 'Log on as a Service' initially were then correctly granted permission, but the other 4 in 'Bypass traverse
checking', 'Adjust Memory Quotas for a process' and 'Impersonate a Client after authentication' were still not added.
When running a repair on this install, 'NT Service\MSSQLFDLauncher' was then granted the correct permissions, but 'NT SERVICE\MsDtsServer110' was still missing 'Bypass traverse checking' and 'Impersonate a Client after authentication'.
This also resulted in the installation of Reporting Services - Native failing in the original installation with 'Attempted to perform an unauthorized operation'.
If anyone has recently installed SQL 2012, can you check (via gpedit.msc) that the correct 'User Right Assignment' was granted to the per Service SIDs as per
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143504(v=sql.110) ?

Have you resolved this yet? Group policy for the OU with my desktop removes all SQL per-service rights. If group policy is your issue, I'd be interested in how some are retained.
Randy in Marin

Lookout "Client" Not Updating with Correct Numbers

We have Lookout 6.6 processes running on full development servers at separate locations. At Station 1, Lookout is communicating with plcs collecting data. The data here is updating properly. At Station 2, we have expressions looking at data on the Lookout process running at Station 1. At Station 2, our expression might look something like this:
\\192.168.201.10\processname\modbus1.30001 192.168.201.10 is the static IP address of the Lookout computer at Station 1.
If for some reason the computer at Station 2 is restarted, the value of the expression shown above will often times be incorrect when Lookout comes back up. It will stay incorrect until the actual value of the expression changes at Station 1, or we modify the expression at Station 2 and type it in exactly as it was. Somehow, this forces the expression to update and the value will be corrected. This is causing significant problems because we cannot rely on the values shown at Station 2 to be correct on signals that aren't continuously changing.
I have installed the latest Logos engine (via a Lookout 6.7.2 install) to try and address this issue, and it does appear to be better, but the problem is still occurring. The problem is not an inability to communicate between Station 1 and Station 2, because modifying the expression at Station 2 to be exactly as it was causes the numbers to properly update.
Any suggestions to address this problem will be appreciated very much.
Jeff Miller

Thanks for the reply Ryan.
All updates for 6.0.2 are current.
I updated the hyper.cbx as noted in your post.
This did not seem to correct the problem.
We do not have any of the client laptop firewalls turned on. If I turn the server firewall on, I can't connect to the client laptops.(Seperate issue that I will deal with in another post.)
I turned the firewalls for the client laptops on and added the following exceptions to the the firewall exceptions list.
C:\Windows\system32\lkads.exe
C:\Windows\system32\lktsrv.exe
C:\Windows\system32\nicitdl.exe
C:\Windows\system32\nicitdl5.exe
C:\Program Files\National Instruments\Lookout x.x\lookout.exe
I can now connect and get the Hypertrend to work.
The first couple of times the trending was slow but by turning the
trend off, the trend would slowly load. It is now a lot faster and
probably is restricted, now by the modem speed.
Thanks for your help.
WaterWorks
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/0D7B86F4B4D19A5E86256F9A006EECB1?OpenDocument
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/8AE45BBFA1D7025E862570F200642FD8?OpenDocument
hyper1.zip (89 kb)
Message Edited by WaterWorks on 06-25-2008 06:23 PM

SQL Developer, Deploy Cloud Cart Status is at Approved for a long time and not moving forward i.e. not processing.

SQL Developer, Deploy Cloud Cart Status is at Approved for a long time and not moving forward i.e. not processing.
Please help.
Thanks
Srinivas

Hi Gustavo,
It appears your Service SFTP user was not created correctly. Please contact support and mention the fact that your Service SFTP user appears on Security/Users tab and not on Security/SFTP Users tab.
Vlad

Alerts not retrieving the correct number of records

Hi,
I have created alerts to run plans. These plans are getting records from DB and populating the ADC. The alerts are getting executed but are not retrieving the correct number of records.
I have created 5 alerts to run 5 plans all in the same time. The error at the "Data Flow service status" window is :
CACHED RESULT
     REQUEST ID: {4EB6B955-96B3-4AF2-B836-6C9F417D47A6}
     EXECPLAN ID: {11372B4D-9ACE-4CFB-831F-11028FF996D5}
     EXECPLAN NAME: xxxx
     FIX COUNT: 0
     START TIME: 6/8/2006 12:00:01 PM
     EXECUTION TIME: 0:00:00
     Sink Records Blocks Disk Blocks Fix Count Hit Count Execution Status
     0: 0 0 0 0 0
Complete - ERROR Error while processing the data for the step 'SQL Query'
This error is seen for 2-3 plans .......
But if i execute the plan manually from design studio there is no error.
So
1. Do i need to change anything in the config files to increase the MAx memory block?
2. Is there any way, the plans can be run one at a time i.e. configure alerts in such a way that if one plan finishes the other one starts automatically? Currently i have scheduled the plans to run at the same time using Alerts..
Please help...
Thanks

Here is one 'culprit' you can verify. Open DesignStudio. You should "--not--" see any grids or icons on (near) the botton status row. If you see them - right click and delete them. These are plans with same_names put in 'locked' state. After you do this. close your design studio.
Note- if you ever open a plan in designstudio, always "save" it and close it (exit). Donot click on window [x] mark to close the appl.
After above verifrication -- restart EnterpriseLink and restart PlanMonitor, verify if everything runs fine.
--sanjeev

XI can not process empty files

Hi All,
We have some problems as SAP is sending empty files.
are there any way to avoid this kind of files?
Actually an error happens when an empty file is sended. Xi is not able to process it and this empty files blocks the correct execution of the following files.
Thanks a lot in advance and kind regards

Hi Masters,
We had an error this morning. This is the log:
2007-04-12 08:00:00 UTC: Error: File 'Diageo_Multisite_col.dat': Archiving to file'/data/backup/20070412-080000-296_Diageo_Multisite_col.dat' on FTP Server after processing failed: FTPEx: Transfer complete.
The file Diageo_Multisite_col.dat is Zero bytes.
It is not important as this file will be overwrited tomorrow and the interface will be executed.
But in other interfaces that take a lot of files, if one is empty XI does not process any of them and does not provide any log. Until Zero bytes files will be deleted XI will not process files.
Hope it helps somebody to help me in order to understand the problem
Thank you very much
Regards.

Httpd not processing php correctly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for