Hue twists and correcting for metamerism editing ccChart Wizard profile "?'s"

Since this is loaded topic I'll organize my questions thusly:
1. Are hue twists that are incorporated within new Adobe created camera profiles with some camera models that alter hues when darkening or adding contrast edits within ACR or Lightroom also incorporated within PE generated custom recipe profiles or ccChart Wizard generated profiles?
2. When generating a ccChart Wizard generated profile in an attempt for accuracy over pleasing colors, is it wise or useful to edit this profile in DNG PE to compensate objects that produce metamerism to my camera? For instance some polyfiber knit fabrics I've captured give off a red hue that ccChart Wizard profile won't correct for. If I selectively edit this off colored object within DNG PE, will it produce a profile/recipe that will subsequently mess up other colors in future scene captures that don't inject this metamerism?

Thanks for confirming that, Sandy.
<br />
<br />Switching between Adobe Standard and the DNG PE test chart wizard profile induces similar hue twist effects only without a density edit. The appearance of these changes isn't exactly the same, though, but just wanted to make sure.
<br />
<br />There's a pronounced change to saturation and luminance of reds, purples and blues and fleshtone highlites between the two. I can't tell if it's a saturation boost or color temp mismatch. Here's a sample image where it's most pronounced.
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.pixentral.com/show.php?picture=1ylxlOupVec5DsRL10ODuXfOY1ZG3t" /></a>
<img alt="Picture hosted by Pixentral" src="http://www.pixentral.com/hosted/1ylxlOupVec5DsRL10ODuXfOY1ZG3t_thumb.jpg" border="0" />

Similar Messages

  • Software or website for validating and correcting for XHTML syntax

    I have some jsp pages and html pages.
    I would like to format all of them so that all are conform to XHTML standard.
    Is there any software or online website that provide the functionality of validate HTML and if possible auto-correct it?

    If you search google for 'Eclipse Europa', you can download the free IDE which a large bulk of users are using. When you open an html or jsp file in that IDE, it opens with a JSP editor. The editor will tell you if there are any problems. Its also a good idea to develop in an IDE. Alternatively, you can also use Dreamweaver for editing html and JSP, if you like spending money.

  • Media file thumbnails in browser say "media offline", but files are online and available for viewing/editing. How do I get a thumbnail of the clip back?

    I am moderately experienced with FCE, but cannot figure out this issue. The thumbnails in my browser say "media offline", and no longer show a thumbnail of my video clip. When I try to reconnect the media files, the reconnect dialog box only checks for "online" media. I am able to view and work with the media files in my project even though it says they are offline. This issue seems to occur after a power outage. Its more of an annoyance than anything else, but I would still like to find a solution. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Figured it out.

  • N8- Cut and Paste for Photo Edit?

    Hello,
    Am I am able to cut and paste from one image to another with my existing photo software?
    Compared to other phones - Nokia has awesome photo editing capability....
    If you know how - please help?
    Thanks,
    V
    Nokia 3395
    Nokia 6600
    Nokia N95 8GB
    Nokia N8 (Anna)
    Nokia Lumia 930

    Unfortunately, N8 pre-installed photo editor not able to do so. However, you can crop/resize photo but not copy & paste.
    Hope this helps you.
    If you find this post helpful, please show your appreciation by clicking the Kudos star at the left. If it provides you the solution, please click on the GREEN Accept as Solution button at below

  • What Macbook Pro to get for video editing?

    For software like adobe after effects cs5, what macbook would be the best, I have pretty limited money so is the base model ok? if not whitch one works well?
    Thanks!

    The top end non-retina, 15" anti-glare is the best. SSD preferred, has a Superdrive. RAM and hard drive upgradable later by the user.
    The retina has a glossy screen which is hard on the eyes and using in various places, it's battery life is terrible and the images are not correct as it's blowing things up to mach the higher pixel rate. No Superdrive. You can't open the machine up, you can't clean the fans of dust you can't upgrade it later, you will have to max it out at purchase for a small fortune and go way over budget. Plus there really isn't too much difference in the quality of the screen with regular MBP's anyway, just eats battery life to drive that huge pixel screen. You'll be replacing it a lot sooner than the standard 15"
    Don't waste your money on the 13", it lacks a dedicated graphics, the CPU does it thus it's HOT. Won't 3D game well if your also into play.
    Top end 15" antiglare is perfect.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X0wo6dIsMU
    Actually the MacPro is the perfect choice of power and performance for video editing, with it's substancial cooling. But you want a laptop , just know things will take longr and the machien will be hotter as a result and wear out sooner if your doing 3D gaming or video often.

  • Batch photos analysis, correction and processing - One size (analysis and correction) does not fit all

    PS CC 2014, Bridge and ACR. iMac. 100 pictures. Each  picture was taken in a totally difference environment (lighting, noon and evening. inside, outside, ISO, etc).  I need to process all 100 photos in ACR at the same time (don’t have time to manually analyze and edit one photo at a time) whereby each picture receives it own unique individual AUTO analysis and correction. One identical cookie cutter analysis and correction for all 100 photos will NOT work. I have the same question using LIGHTROOM. I will end up adopting whichever solution (ACR or LIGHTROOM) is the easiest and fastest.  I do realize that I will have to go back and tweak each photo. Thanks. Bob

    So I cannot just click once and the system will AUTO run all 100 photos through all the possible options (exposure, contrast, white balance, etc.). I sounds like I will have to run all 100 photos though each individual element (exposure, contrast, white balance, etc.). This would be very time consuming. Please clarify.

  • Lightroom - batch processing. One size (analysis and correction) does not fit all

    PS CC 2014, Bridge and ACR or Lightroom. iMac. 100 pictures. Each  picture was taken in a totally difference environment (lighting, noon and evening. inside, outside, ISO, etc).  I need to process all 100 photos in ACR at the same time (don’t have time to manually analyze and edit one photo at a time) whereby each picture receives it own unique individual auto analysis and correction. One identical cookie cutter analysis and correction for all 100 photos will NOT work. I have the same question using LIGHTROOM. I will end up adopting whichever solution (ACR or LIGHTROOM) is the easiest and fastest.  I do realize that I will have to go back and tweak each photo. Thanks. Bob

    So I cannot just click once and the system will AUTO run all 100 photos through all the possible options (exposure, contrast, white balance, etc.). I sounds like I will have to run all 100 photos though each individual element (exposure, contrast, white balance, etc.). This would be very time consuming. Please clarify.

  • Best external monitor for text editing

    Hi all - I have a 2011 MBP and want to connect it to an external monitor (+ mouse and keyboard) for text editing and web browsing. Text clarity is very important to me. First I've tried to connect  a mainstream Acer monitor, and then Lenovo ThinkVision eIPS LT2452pwc at work, and in both cases Mac fonts looked somewhat "fuzzy" where Windows and Linux fonts looked nice and sharp. In all cases I've used native screen resolution. There is nothing wrong with Laptop either (I tried a couple), and it has probably to do with different antialiasing algorithm that Apple is using, which looks good on higher pixel density laptop panels, but not that great on exteranal monitors.
    So... any advice from those using Macs with external monitor for text tasks? Obviously there are Mac displays, but I have some concerns about the glare. Then  I heard good feedback about Dell UltraSharp and NEC IPS monitors. Trully appreciate your input for somebody new to Mac.

    Yes, I did get Dell Ultrasharp U2713HM. I am happy with it with one caviat (which would be the same for 27 Apple monitor). The picture quality is absolutely amazing - the text is very shart and clear, I can't imagine it to be better. The color is very good and natural, plenty of brigtness and contrast to produce a good picture in any light conditions, plus *no glare* screen surface, arguably making this monitor better than the Apple monitor.
    The somewhat unexpected caviat is that since this monitor packs pretty high resolution in a 27" screen, the text appears smaller than on most other monitors (but would be the same as on Apple 27" monitor). It even *appears* smaller than on my 13" Macbook Pro, however at closer examination, that turned out to be not true. The text on the monitor is actually bigger than on laptop, but looks smaller since typically the external monitor is farther away from the eyes than a laptop monitor.
    At first I wanted to return the monitor and exchange for smaller and lower DPI (read bigger text) 24" Ultrasharp, but then got used to my 27" monitor and decided to keep it. Hope this helps.

  • Mac Pro for Video Editing?

    So I have an awesome Mac Pro computer at work all well equiped with all the bells and wistles for video editing and now I'm looking to upgrade my machine at home which is currently just a macbook pro with a second monitor.
    My one concern is that the Mac Pro has not been updated in sometime.  Obviously the mac bro route would be best for me being in video production so I can easily upgrade component with the never ending technology that keeps changing.  Now the concern about buying a Mac Pro right now is the possibilites of it being upgraded.  Now I understand things are obviously always being upgraded and things are never up to date for very long.  However I'm concerned that if in like 3-4 months they came out with something and changed the decision that I maybe screwed for upgrade components along the way.
    Just thought I'd get some insight from some of you and what your suggestions maybe?
    Thanks in advance.

    budget, time-line, stomach for 1.0 revamp (every new model, 2012 could be 3x), lack of Rosetta of course.
    production never = bleeding edge, go for a mature well tested proven design - expect to see firmware change, compatibility issues, and 3-4 months for a unified build and drivers rolled out, no?
    a nice $2200 "hold me over the hump" for the next 6-12 months for now, W3690/X3690 DIY (the w3680 3.33 6-core is mere $620)
    no easy answer that I see with all the products Intel has on their plates.

  • My name is Mike. I live in New Zealand. My username is waipukurau1. I downloaded MacBook booster from the prompts. Was this a good idea and good for my MacBook Pro? Please answer.

    My name is Mike. I live in New Zealand. My username is waipukurau1. I downloaded MacBook booster. I write to ask was this a good idea? Was this good and correct for my MacBook Pro. Please answer.

    ashish35,
    No one from Apple here - we're just users like you. All I can tell you is that electronic fail and with MacBook Pros (and most notebooks) the components are so integrated as to make a repair to the logic board practically impossible, hence the high prices charged for repairs.
    Only you can decide if you want to have your computer repaired or put the money towards the purchase of a new computer. If you do decide to purchase a new unit I would suggest that you also purchase the AppleCare Protection Plan which increases your warranty from one year to three years.
    Sorry and good luck,
    Clinton

  • 5930K vs 5960X for AVCHD editing and color correction?

    ***I have also posted this in Hardware Forum because I'm not certain which forum will be the best place to ask. Mods, I apologize if this is a no-no and of course you're welcome to remove the one you deem inappropriately placed. Thanks**
    Hi guys, getting ready to have a new custom system built (probably iBuyPower, not sure yet). I would love your input on choosing the ideal processor. I have read benchmarks and forums on both the Intel 5960X and the 5930K. Most benchmarks are only concerned about encoding times, not the actual editing and color correction processes. I realize that encoding (exporting) would be generally faster on the 8-core 5960 compared to the 6-core 5930. HOWEVER, all my source material is AVCHD and for that, higher clock speed does make a big difference during the actual editing. So let's forget about encoding/exporting right now and ONLY think about the actual editing. Let's also assume I will not overclock, or if I do then never more than 20%.* I 'm not a gamer and this workstation is ONLY for editing. I use Premiere Pro CC 2014.x and always keep it up to the latest version.
    Since the 5960X is only clocked at 3.0 Hz. I'm concerned that editing and color correcting AVCHDs will be not as smooth as one would expect from a $1000 chip. The editing process is quite complex, with multiple video layers (all AVCHD, either 60p or 60i), picture-in-picture, color correction (mostly GPU-accelerated ones such as the Three Way CC and RGB Curves), and so on. It's not simple cuts and a few transitions. In fact, the work required on those AVCHD files is very much beyond what AVCHD is meant for but it is what it is.
    So, considering all that, would you STILL fork out the extra cash to get the 5960X versus the 5930K, and if so, why?
    I thank you in advance for your opinions and insight!
    Current planned system specs (highlights)
    - Win 8.1
    - 5930K or 5960X (help!)
    - Asus Rampage V
    - 32 Gb 2666 RAM
    - GTX 780 (possibly will invest in a Titan X 12 Gb if funds allow)
    - Intel 730 SSD (480 GB) for OS and programs
    - I will use my current set of 5-6 SSD drives for sources, scratches, misc pull files, exports
    Thanks again for your feedback!
    PS: I would like to emphasize again that the actual process of editing and color correcting AVCHD files is what matters most to me here rather than getting the absolute fastest encoding times.
    * I realize that both chips are unlocked and made for overclocking. I've overclocked for years but frankly, I was never that comfortable with it, lots of crashes and instability - and that was at low overlock levels of around 20% or less. I do not want manage overclocking or thermal management or worry about frying the chips. If at all possible I would like to run the chips at stock, or as close to stock as possible. However I'm also open to suggestions about that.

    Actually the 5960X will clock the turbo speed for all cores if you set it that way which is one of the things we do with our systems. All Intel chips that are not locked can clock to their turbo rating for all cores if set that way. Even without setting all cores to the peak turbo ratio they will turbo to a clock speed higher than base when all cores are active. It's just not the peak turbo ratio. That has to be manually set. Turbo occurs anytime the system load reaches beyond a low level regardless of what your doing. The system boards and bios effect that. You can also disable a setting in the bios and the system will always stay at it's peak clock ratio. The 5960X clocked at 3.9 will easily outperform the 5930K with all codecs due to the cores and cache.
    We can configure the systems with any hardware available in the market. However we cant include all those items on the website right now without making it far harder for people to configure systems. The hardware options we list are there because they are tested to work with the video and audio hardware/software and the reliability. We also support the systems as a solution for the life of the system. We have price the systems for that support which is part of the price difference. The options you are looking at wont have near the same support or expertise with the hardware and software together hence why your asking the questions here.
    Eric
    ADK

  • What Compressor codec should I use for footage recorded on a Canon T3i, edited on FCP 6, and intended for Vimeo?

    I am looking for help!
    My planned workflow is as follows:
    Footage recorded on Canon Rebel T3i  --->  Edited on Final Cut Pro 6 (sequence compression is apparently H.264 according to the browser)  --->  Compressed with Compressor (ver 3.0.5) in original 1920 x 1080, 24p format  --->  Uploaded to Vimeo
    I am now at the point where I am trying to find a Compressor setting that will create a compressed movie that looks somewhat similar to what I see in the canvas in Final Cut Pro 6.  I have tried using the H.264, Apple ProRes 422(HQ), HD Uncompressed 8-bit, and XDCAM HD 1080p24 settings and in all cases, my movie plays back fine, however, the brightness/exposure seems to be hiked up a few stops and there is a substantial amount of noise in both the blacks and midtones that doesn't appear in FCP's canvas.
    My compressed movie I wish to export is only intended for Vimeo (similar to Youtube).  Is there a different setting I should be trying, or perhaps a way of downloading a more effective or current codec??  Any suggestions are greatly appreciated as it is very disappointing to see my movie degraded so much from its orginal quality.
    Shaun M

    H.264.  But the FCP Legacy (FCP 7 and earlier) Canvas and Viewer aren't color accurate.  Not designed to be. Their purpose is to show you what you are doing, show you the footage so you can make editing decisions. For color accuracy, the ideal way, since this was designed with television and feature editing in mind, is to have an IO device like those AJA.com and DECKLINK.com make, and send the signal to an HDTV or broadcast monitor. 
    Apple has realized that more and more people are editing for the web and computers only, so they made it so that FCX's viewer IS color accurate.  So...what that means is that currently, using what you have, you won't get things to match....they aren't designed to. So you can adjust for what happens when you export.
    But a big issue is that you are editing H.264 in FCP native. FCP doesn't work with H.264 native well, all sorts of potential issues can arise.  Sync issues, quality issues, the correct shot be exported, all sorts of things.  FCP works best with the FCP editing codecs. What are they? They are found in the EASY SETUP list.  But for HD, the most commonly used option is ProRes 422.  There is a BIG problem that FCP Legacy will SEEM like it'll work with H.264 natively just fine...it doens't throw up any warnings. That is bad. Also something Apple fixed with FCX. 
    The fact that you are editing H.264, and trying to export H.264, might also lead to the footage being more off that it would if you edited ProREs 422, and exported H.264.  Note...H.264 is a higher data rate codec, and easier for FCP to work with...but because it has a higher data rate, the file sizes are much higher than the original H.264.  5-6x larger.  FCP 7 did have a way to import Canon 5D, 7D and T2i (needed a hack with the T2i) via Log and Transfer.  But it doesn't work with the T3i...not even with that hack. Because FCP 7 was no longer updated after the T3i came out. It's 4 year old software, discontinued 2 years ago.
    If you want to edit native, you need to look at Adobe Premiere Pro CC. It's interface is more accurate too.

  • I'm using Adobe Acrobat with the hope of editing a url on the graphic...a simple 3-letter change, save, close and send for printing..how do I get in edit mode to delete 3 letters and insert 3 new letters?

    ?I'm using Adobe Acrobat with the hope of editing a url on the graphic...a simple 3-letter change, save, close and send for printing..how do I get in edit mode to delete 3 letters and insert 3 new letters?

    pkg4ibm wrote:
    editing a url on the graphic...
    Not sure what you mean by that: is that URL in an image, or is it actual text?
    If it is in an image, then you need to extract the image, edit it with something like Photoshop, then add it back to the PDF.
    If the URL is actual text, I suggest that you remove the entire URL, then add the corrected link.

  • Options gone for select,edit, and print under HP Smart Web banner since HP dialed in to fix crash

    The buttons are gone for selecting, editing, and printing under my HP Smart Web since HP dialed in and fixed another problem.  I have uninstalled and reinstalled the software but still no luck.  All that shows up is the "HP Smart Web Printing" banner with the X to exit; that's it, no options listed below.  My computer has completely crashed twice since I started using it 1/4/10.  The second time the person dialed in and changed the bios and a few things in msconfig but I don't see anything there that would cause the smart web printing.  HELP.  Am I missing something really silly since I am a new user of HP Smart Print?
    Thank you in advance if you can help!
    ^j^Put behind you the troubles of yesterday, today's a new day full of blessings.
    ^j^May you and your loved ones be blessed with peace, love, joy,and health now and forever.
    ^j^Put behind you the troubles of yesterday, today's a new day full of blessings.
    ^j^May you and your loved ones be blessed with peace, love, joy,and health now and forever.
    ^j^Carrie

    I am REALLY annoyed to read this post. I have spent a lot of time to try and fix my computer (which I don't have with 5 kids...not your problem I know and NOT the point). It should NOT be this hard to update and fix a product. I DON'T WANT the Bing bar...and am feeling like I am being forced to accept it to make my puter run correctly because it is supported by HP. What....kind of service is THAT???????? I hope that someone from HP....admin or whatever...reads this. I am "madder" than mad. I have had HP products for years with few problems...and all of which I could find a solution for. This is unacceptable...and I hope someone listens. I don't know if I can trust HP again....when it won't even use the browser most use without problems. Sorry to the rest of the "forum" for venting...but I can't get help...am frustrated...find this out now...and it is nothing personal.

  • Dual 17'' Displays and an NTSC Monitor for Video Editing

    I am trying to hook up two 17'' apple monitors and an NTSC television monitor for video editing, but all I have on the back of my G5 tower is one ADC plug and one DVI plug. Any advice on how to make this work would be greatly appreciated.

    If you run in anything other than the LCD's native resolution your graphics card will be resampling the image. This inevitably distorts the image as pixels must be discarded to create the display. Typically this softens the image.
    Cheers,
    Neale
    Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children

Maybe you are looking for