Huge folio file size

Hi there
I have a folio that has ballooned to about 500 megs. There are 8 articles, about 3 pages each and only 3 videos (2 megs, 18 megs and 23 megs) total. The updates to download are now massive. I'm not sure where all thus size is coming from?
Is there a way to check individual article size on the cloud? the size doesn't make sense.
thanks for any input!!
S

I wrote a collection of things you can do to optimize folio size
http://digitalpublishing.tumblr.com/post/11650748389/reducing-folio-filesize
(mobil gesendet)

Similar Messages

Folio file size

My project is to convert an 800 page Indesign print catalog into a DPS folio. I have 14 out of 26 articles completed and received a message on my iPad saying I was almost out of space message while previewing in Content Viewer. When I deleted it from Content Viewer it is just over 11gb and when I looked at the local resource on hard drive it is 5.75gb. Ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Is it typical for the Content Viewer file to be twice the size of the local file? Which is a better indicator of what to expect for a finished project?
This is obviously way too large. How can I make this a more manageable size? First, this has a dual orientation. The vertical is produced first, then an alternate layout is created for the horizontal. The vertical is deleted and the layout is saved as _h. Would having only one orientation reduce my overall size significantly? Each article's individual .folio file size ranges from 400mb-600mb. It was my understanding that Folio Builder compressed/converted all images used in the articles. Do I need to convert all of the high resolution print images into low resolution?
Thanks,
Joe

On further inspection, I found my problem. It appears to be a web content overlay. An article's .folio file is 482mb with this layer in the Indesign layout file and only 5.3mb when removed from the Indesign layout file.
The content associated with the overlay is 2 HTML files at 2kb each and images, css, and javascript totaling 524kb.
Why does this create over a 900% increase in the file size?
How can I fix this?
Will an html resources folder work? I thought that was only for html articles.

Large folio file size

We are half way through a book that comprises 100 single page articles. However it is already nearly 500 MB and this isn't sustainable.
Does the following affect the file size:
Is the Folio file size affected by the number of individual articles, would it be smaller if we had stacks of say 10 articles each with 10 pages rather than 100 single pages?
Every page has a two picture (JPG) object state, the first image is an extreme elargement of the image that visible only for a about a second before the full frame image appears. Each page has a caption using Pan overlay that can be dragged into the page using a small tab.Does an Object State increase the file size over and above the images contained within it?
We have reduced the JPGs to the minimum acceptable quality and there is no video in the Folio.
Any ideas would be much appreciated?

800 MB worth of video sounds crazy.
Of course, a high number of videos can bring you to that.
I saw bigger dps apps. I think the apple limit lies around 4 gb (remember,
that is more than 25% of a whole 16 gb iPad)
The mp4 video codec does a really good job while keeping the quality high.
And the human eye is more forgiving to quality when it comes to moving
images compared to still imagery.
I wrote a collection of tipps and ideas how to reduce your file size.
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigitalpublis hing.tumblr.com%2Fpost%2F11650748389%2Freducing-folio-filesize&ei=uVbeTv_yD--M4gTY_OWbBw&u sg=AFQjCNHroLkcl-neKlpeidULpQdosl08vw
—Johannes
(mobil gesendet. fat fingers. beware!)
Am 06.12.2011 18:32 schrieb "gnusart" <[email protected]>:
Re: Large folio file size created by gnusart<http://forums.adobe.com/people/gnusart>in
Digital Publishing Suite - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4067148#4067148>

Huge HD file sizes in iMovie when importing AVCHD files from HD Camcorder

Although several answers have been given on different ways to import HD files from a AVCHD camcorder, in this case a Sony one, the issue is what to do with the HUGE files it creates. I recorded 2 hours of HD content in about 30GB on the camcorder. I can burn those native HVCHD files on DVD's, took 6 of them, and play them on a Blue Ray player in HD. To edit, I tested a sample 50MB file that was about 3 minutes in length. It convered to quicktime file in the same 1920x1080 quality resulted in a file that was about 800MB, looked great, but how do I store or play a 20 minute version of it? iMovie is inadequate to do anything other than produce smaller size files for an iPod or lower quality, unless it is going to be a very short HD movie if doing true HD quality. One of the reasons I took the MAC plunge was the better multimedia capabilities. In this case, Apple (iMove and Final Cut) is behind.
I ended up shifting my HD editing back to a PC with $100 Sony Vegas software that can edit the AVCHD files and author in it. I can produce a DVD with about 25 minutes of edited HD in AVCDH file format and play it. I can also store the finished product in a much smaller space using AVCHD files. I have a 1 TB drive on my Mac that would be consumed if I worked in iMovie with converting all these AVCDH files and kept them in HD quality since it looks like it needs to expand them 12-16 times the AVCHD file size.
Yes, I know I could lower the quality to better work with them in iMovie, but that makes no sense to me. I want to record and edit in the HD format. Seems like these AVCHD cameras are becoming a standard since they are so efficient at storing HD content, iMovie needs to figure out how to edit and store them the same way. Very disappointed in how iMovie handles HD, to me it is NOT very good at handling HD, no good way to store or distribute it.
Am I missing soomething here? I have spent hours looking for a different answer, but have not found one yet? Maybe the next version of iMovie will be better. I like using it for SD DVD authoring, but for HD, did not work at all for me.
Jon

Interesting you say it is not meant for editing, but there are about a half dozen editor's for windows that will work on these exact files. I know with Sony Vegas that I have the same level of control with frame precision as I do with iMovie so I think there must be more to the story why Apple has not been able to support it like other software manufacturers who support windows. Don't get me wrong, i would love to do the work in iMovie and not have to learn something new. I don't have the storage space to use the HD apple format, that 2 hr of HD in AVCHD would turn into about 500GB then what do I put it on to play it. If the BlueRay standard calls for 25 or 50G disc's and we can get full two hour movies on them today, then they must be using a file format similar to AVCHD to fit on a disc, they cannot be using anything close to what Apple uses for HD files, it is just simple logic and math. So why doesn't Apple finure it out before everyone who starts working in HD comes to the same conclusion that the Apple QT file formats for HD is going to be an issue with space, you can create content, but cannot afford the disc space to store it or play it.

Huge .rpt File Sizes

Post Author: ssolice
CA Forum: Crystal Reports
I have a question that I've been unable to get answered on any of the other forums.I am using Crystal Reports v10.The vast majority of my 300+ reports are 8,637KB. Many of the reports that also include sub-reports are much larger 17-18MB. Only a few reports are what appear to be "normal" size - 10 or 12KB.I can see no report settings that are different in a 10KB report file and a 17MB report file. No, I'm not saving the data with the report file.Any help is much appreciated.Thanks.

If file size is the biggest concern, once you've cleared out
all items
you don't need any longer, try:
1. Doing a Save As, then a Save As again. Often, for whatever
reason,
this finally gets rid of old, unused objects.
2. Create a new project and import the existing project's
slides. This
can have the same effect.
In my experience, the first is better for reducing file sizes
and the
second is better for getting rid of any playback anomalies.
Otherwise, a better approach for what you're doing, again in
my
experience, would be to cut up the audio outside of Captivate
into one
file per slide (using a tool like Audacity), import them all
into the
library, then add each individually. That's our standard
process and
we've yet to experience these huge, bloated CP files (knock,
knock).
Erik
luke@nesc wrote:
> I have been using Captivate to imbed an audio recording
of a presentation into
> the slides for said presentation. The audio is in the
form of one large mp3
> file. When adding the audio, I select the option to
distribute over many files,
> and line up all the slides to the correct part of the
audio. If i need to edit
> the slide times or audio (this happens frequently
because captivate seems to be
> rather buggy when splitting up the single audio track
into one for each slide)
> the resulting Captivate Project file rockets in file
size. ....
Erik Lord
http://www.capemedia.net
Adobe Community Expert - Authorware
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
http://www.awaretips.net -
samples, tips, products, faqs, and links!
*Search the A'ware newsgroup archives*
http://groups.google.com/group/macromedia.authorware

Huge captivate file sizes

I have been using Captivate to imbed an audio recording of a
presentation into the slides for said presentation. The audio is in
the form of one large mp3 file. When adding the audio, I select the
option to distribute over many files, and line up all the slides to
the correct part of the audio. If i need to edit the slide times or
audio (this happens frequently because captivate seems to be rather
buggy when splitting up the single audio track into one for each
slide) the resulting Captivate Project file rockets in file size. I
believe this is because it is keeping a copy of all audio used in
Captivate, ie an old and new copy of the whole mp3 stream, before
and after editting.
If this happens a few times the file size grows accordingly,
and for a 50min presentation i'm looking at project files of 1.3GB.
These are clearly pushing my (powerfull dual core, 2GB RAM) desktop
to the limit. I have tried removing all unsed items from the
library but this makes no difference to the size of the projects.
To illustrate the problem to a friend I deleted EVERYTHING
from the library, added 1 new blank slide and deleted all the other
slides. The resulting project looked akin to a brand new blank one.
Upon saving (as a new cp file) the project was infact 1.16GB in
size. Eh?
Is there some way of deleting files from captivate projects
other than the library?

If file size is the biggest concern, once you've cleared out
all items
you don't need any longer, try:
1. Doing a Save As, then a Save As again. Often, for whatever
reason,
this finally gets rid of old, unused objects.
2. Create a new project and import the existing project's
slides. This
can have the same effect.
In my experience, the first is better for reducing file sizes
and the
second is better for getting rid of any playback anomalies.
Otherwise, a better approach for what you're doing, again in
my
experience, would be to cut up the audio outside of Captivate
into one
file per slide (using a tool like Audacity), import them all
into the
library, then add each individually. That's our standard
process and
we've yet to experience these huge, bloated CP files (knock,
knock).
Erik
luke@nesc wrote:
> I have been using Captivate to imbed an audio recording
of a presentation into
> the slides for said presentation. The audio is in the
form of one large mp3
> file. When adding the audio, I select the option to
distribute over many files,
> and line up all the slides to the correct part of the
audio. If i need to edit
> the slide times or audio (this happens frequently
because captivate seems to be
> rather buggy when splitting up the single audio track
into one for each slide)
> the resulting Captivate Project file rockets in file
size. ....
Erik Lord
http://www.capemedia.net
Adobe Community Expert - Authorware
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
http://www.awaretips.net -
samples, tips, products, faqs, and links!
*Search the A'ware newsgroup archives*
http://groups.google.com/group/macromedia.authorware

Huge background file sizes in CP5.5

I've noticed recently that all my background file sizes are huge - over 2 MB each. Earlier projects would vary the size of the background files - most around 60-80K, and a few the same as the current ones 2,257.21K.
I wondered if it has to do with adding more master slides, or the slides in the template (my templates include several example slides, which are removed when the project is completed). I've also noticed that the images etc. in the library are still marked after the example slides are removed, apparently because they are part of the template.
Can anyone explain this stuff? It's increasing the size of files and therefore the loading time tremendously, not a good idea.
Thanks,
Marion

Just an addition to this...I edited one of the background files in an outside graphics program. The file was only 42KB. I reduced it from 8-bits/Channel to 256 colors, which presumably would decrease the size of the background file. The actual file is only 32 KB, but the file in Captivate is still 2257.21 KB, though it says it is 256 colors. It should at least be a smaller file.
I tried exporting the original file, and it was 1.61 MB.
Captivate is apparently leaving a fixed amount of space for each background file, which is out of proportion to the actual size of the file.
I also tried capturing the same screens in a blank project with no master slides, in case it was somehow attaching them to each graphic. It made no difference. Each background was still 2.257 KB, which still seems larger than the capture should be.
I tried capturing at 790 x 545, and as Lilybiri says, it is 1.7 MB.
I also captured the 990x570 file with Snag-it, and it was 1.67 MB
The problem is that, while the file may be compressed on publishing, the projects are now much larger than they used to be, and are causing problems on loading.
I am trying Rod's suggestion of a blank slide at the beginning...

Folio file size limit

In the past their were file size limits for folios and folio resources. I believe folios and their resources could not go over 100MB.
Is their a file size limit to a folio and its resources? What is the limit?
What happens if the limit is exceeded?
Dave

Article size is currently capped at 2GB. We've seen individual articles of up to 750MB in size but as mentioned previously you do start bumping into timeout issues uploading content of that size. We're currently looking at implementing a maximum article size based on the practical limitations of upload and download times and timeout values being hit.
This check will be applied at article creation time and you will not be allowed to create articles larger than our maximum size. Please note that we are working on architecture changes that will allow the creation of larger content but that will take some time to implement.
Currently to get the best performance you should have all your content on your local machine (Not on a network drive), shut down any extra applications, get the fastest machine you can, with the most memory. The size of article is direclty proportional to the speed at which you can bundle an article and get it uploaded to the server.

How to reduce folio file size

This is a quote from the Adobe support pages:
Default Image Format Choose a default option for the folio. Individual articles can have different Image Format settings. Choose Automatic if you want to let InDesign determine whether to export the pages as JPEG, PNG, or PDF. If you want to reduce file size at the possible expense of image fidelity and performance, choose JPEG or PDF. Choosing PDF lets users zoom in on pages that do not have interactive content.
Our app is now 825mb and I am looking for ways to shrink it. We have used auto settings (presumably this means JPEG) at High. Our intention was to remake all the folios using PDF* to enable pinch/zoom (on pages that have no interactivity) but there is no way of telling what effect this will have on the file size since the PDF option offers no control over image quality.
Can Adobe please clarify these settings.
* We would have done this from the outset but for the fact that there is no desktop preview for this option.

Thanks Ali
Syncing audio to slide shows difficult, I have tried it. We do have quite a bit of video but also a lot of large stills and these are the ones that I am concerned about if rendering as PDF since there are no controls for altering the image quality within PDF folios. I am wondering what setting actually is actually used?
Best
Graham

Huge .asnd file size?

Hello,
I've been working on a podcast and choose Soundbooth for editing but I'm very disappointed with the way the program works. Basically I have 2 audio files (mp3) and to fix an echo problem - since those 2 audio files were recored using on 2 diffent computers - I need to create tracks to fix this.
It's a little bit complicated to explain but the point is that I have 2 audio files (150mb/file) and I copied them inside Soundbooth and use them for different tracks in a multi track file, the result is that the file size is abour 18gb (?!) and I can hardly work with this amount of data.
Isn't there a way to link the files instead making a new file? Like After Effects does for an example.
Thanks in advance.

Hi David
Karsten is 100% on this I just want to speculate around how I would do.
Easiest way:
is to get an external hard disk BUT THIS SHOULD be:
- a FireWire disk - no USB/USB2 - will not behave if one stores video material on it and tries to work with is here
- has to be Mac OS Extended or Mac OS Extended (journaled) - DOS/UNIX/Mac OS Exchange will not work
There should be at least 10Gb free space on internal hard disk (thumb-role
is 10% free space). at less than 5Gb the Mac OS gets problems due to that it
really is UNIX with a Mac interface. = lots of temp-files (invisible) and virtual
memory management.
Worse way:
Tidy up the internal hard disk so that it has about 10 - 25Gb free space by
storing old documents elsewhere - eg DVD disks, ext hard disks etc.
Yours Bengt W

Huge binary file size difference LV 6.1 to LV 8.2

I have an application that was first developed under LabVIEW 4.2 and has been periodically upgraded as necessary. It is normally run as a built application so LabVIEW version changes only come in when something in the application has to be changed. That occasion occurred and we changed from LabVIEW 6.1 to LabVIEW 8.2 for the build environment. No changes were made to any of the file handling vis (other than what LabVIEW did in the conversion, which I didn't check at all).
The problem is that this application writes a large structure (4320 elements in each of 13 single-precision variables) into a binary file once a day. When I started the new version of the application the size of the files went from 242956 bytes to 775334 bytes.
The vi to read these files still works for the old files as well as the new files and a set of C routines that I use to read the files seems to also work correctly with the new files - at least the data looks like it is supposed to when it is plotted.
The change in file size is a concern since this application is supposed to keep writing these files every day for many years into the future.
Is there any known way to return to the original behavior with the smaller files?

Hi Bryan,
you say: "all changes are made with rotates and insert elements to prefent the arrays from growing"!
You should use "replace array elements" to prevent array growth!!! Please check this with your application!
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

Why Such a Huge Photoshop File Size Increase When Saving In CC from other versions?

Hello,
I have limited experience in Photoshop, and am working with a file with two other people. We are creating web comic pages. The line artist and colorist are both using CS 6. I have CC. The file I receive from them is around 238MB. If I open it and make even the slightest edit, Photoshop will not save it as it warns that the file size is too large (greater than 2GB!). How does this happen? Is it something in my preferences that causes 10x increase in file size?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks!

Thanks for replying. First I didn't have this problem in the beginning. I do the same in CS5 and I can do it with no problem.

Huge iMovie file size.

I made 3 movies in Quicktime from Keynote presentations, sizes 4, 24 and 48 MB, but when I import them into iMovie, the project file grows up to 7+ GB. Could somebody tell me why this happens, and is there a way to make it smaller or am I doing something wrong. That takes up almost all my free hard drive space, and taht is only 1 of three project I want to create.
David

Hi David
Karsten is 100% on this I just want to speculate around how I would do.
Easiest way:
is to get an external hard disk BUT THIS SHOULD be:
- a FireWire disk - no USB/USB2 - will not behave if one stores video material on it and tries to work with is here
- has to be Mac OS Extended or Mac OS Extended (journaled) - DOS/UNIX/Mac OS Exchange will not work
There should be at least 10Gb free space on internal hard disk (thumb-role
is 10% free space). at less than 5Gb the Mac OS gets problems due to that it
really is UNIX with a Mac interface. = lots of temp-files (invisible) and virtual
memory management.
Worse way:
Tidy up the internal hard disk so that it has about 10 - 25Gb free space by
storing old documents elsewhere - eg DVD disks, ext hard disks etc.
Yours Bengt W

Excel data filtration using oledb from huge excel files size approx (200mb) using c# (ADO)

hi,
My ado application requires to read data from one xlsx file(Approx 10-20MB min) and then process the data row by row and compare with
another xlsx file( approx size 250 MB min) containing over 1000000 rows with 63 columns (work like database).
when i try to read the database file (250 MB) and run the oledb data queries on it, it's working so strange, its only give the first matched data from the database file. but if i opened that xlsx database file in office excel and then run my application
its return all matched data from the database file without changing any code.
i already checked my dataquery its working fine in server Explorer and returns the complete result.
this process also very time consuming ,
i already tried openxml sax mathod to resolve the performance issue as well, but its not worked too. even it takes more time compare to oledb to read the excel.
i also have two another issues in my application,
1. sometime oledb returns an exception 'System resource exceeded' and
2. some time return 'internal ole automation error' .
i also tried google to resolve these issue but i didn't find any solution for my problem.
is there any solution to resolve these issues? please help me. any suggestion appreciated but please remember one thing i can't change any xlsx table format because i don't have rights, these xlsx files automatically generated by another tools by our
sourcing partners.
thanks.

Please see this.
http://www.sqlis.com/post/Looping-over-files-with-the-Foreach-Loop.aspx
Or, if you don't have SSIS, do Bulk Insert by looping through the files. Let's say the files have something in common, like a date in the name of the file. Simply run this SQL Server script . . .
DECLARE @intFlag
INT
SET @intFlag
= 1
WHILE (@intFlag
<=48)
BEGIN
PRINT @intFlag
declare @fullpath1
varchar(1000)
select @fullpath1
= '''\\ftp\your_path\'
+ convert(varchar,
getdate()- @intFlag
, 112)
+ '_your_file.txt'''
declare @cmd1
nvarchar(1000)
select @cmd1
= 'bulk insert [dbo].[your_table] from '
+ @fullpath1 +
' with (FIELDTERMINATOR = ''\t'', FIRSTROW = 2, ROWTERMINATOR=''0x0a'')'
exec (@cmd1)
SET @intFlag
= @intFlag + 1
END
GO
Knowledge is the only thing that I can give you, and still retain, and we are both better off for it.

Pictures edited with Photoshop becomes huge in file size

Hey,
Sometimes I like to edit my pictures with Photoshop if there are some things I need to remove etc. But after I save my picture from within Photoshop, it takes up like 70MB or something in my Aperture library. That's a lot for a single picture. Isn't there something to be done so they get down to around RAW-filesize level?
Or do I have to go the long way round and export first (as what?), then edit in Photoshop, save as JPEG, import to Aperture?

This issue of size is not Aperture, per se. If you open one of your RAW files saved directly from the camera to a folder on your Mac, then open with Photoshop, change to Mode settings to be 16 bit vs 8 bit, then Save As a TIFF, you will see the same size increase.
Aperture by default is working in 16 bit color, and that alone will increase TIFFs or PSDs by a factor of two.
Photoshop needs the image file to be either TIFF or PSD to accomplish and then save most edits that require Photoshop, and that you can later re-edit. If your edit requires layers, then you can flatten the image before saving to not pass that increase back into Aperture storage.
Although you can save your edited image as a JPEG in PS, there is no facility to directly pass this back to the Aperture Library.
I find little reason to use Photoshop for editing, unless I need to work with layers, btw, especially since Aperture 3.
Ernie

Huge folio file size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for