Hyper-V Windows 2012 r2 Poor network performance

Hi,
Since that I installed Windows 2012 R2 and Hyper-v, I notice that is very slow performing copy operations from the VMs to the physical machine (appears to be lock to 10MB). Firs I though that this issue was only between the VMs and the parent OS, now I realized
that when copying between this Hyper-v physical host and another physical host in the same subnet I also get only 10MB of speed.
How do I unlock this 10MB limit??
The switch and all NICs are GIGABIT capable and before using Windows 2012 r2, using the same hardware boxes I was doing 400MB of transfers between physical hosts and VMs??!!
Thank you.

I had the exact same issue with the same AR8151 NIC on my Alienware, only I'm running Windows 8.1. 
I have a VM with both an external (to the AR8151) and an internal NIC which serves as both a domain controller and router (RRAS) for my other VMs (which only have Internal interfaces).  There is no VMQ setting on the adapter, and I messed around with
the offload/RSS settings, but performance would drop whenever this VM would be running.  (Internet speed test would go from 95Mbps downstream to about 24Mbps.).  When I paused or shut down the VM, performance would return to normal. 
I found the issue to be an errant entry in my route table which I have no idea how it happened.  A second default route was created which used the internal IP of the VM with a lower metric.  Simply deleting the route corrected the performance issue.
Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface  Metric
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      10.10.1.200        10.10.2.1     
5
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      192.168.1.1    192.168.1.131     10
        10.10.0.0      255.255.0.0         On-link         10.10.2.1    261
        10.10.0.0      255.255.0.0    192.168.1.200    192.168.1.131     11

Similar Messages

  • Very poor network performance with a G4

    I have a white & grey G4 (1.25GHz and 256MB) running OS X 10.4.5. It's exhibiting very poor network performance, e.g. it will not FTP files over a LAN at more than about 40KB/second.
    Other nodes on the same switch perform fine, as do other ports on the switch. The machine is set to autodetect for speed & duplex, so my question is -- how do I debug this? I've tried swapping network cables already...
    Thanks!
    Chris

    This came down to an incompatibility between the G4 and the Cisco. When the switch is set to force 100Mbit but negotiate duplex, the G4 doesn't like it. Going back to auto speed & duplex fixed the problem...

  • Poor Network Performance from VPN sites

    We are experiencing poor network performance when connecting from hardware VPN sites. VPN sites have Cisco Hardware VPN client 3002 which terminates to Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator. Geting upload/download speeds of 355/484kbsp from VPN to surewest.com. If I remove the VPN and connect laptop directly to dsl modem, speeds are 3mb up and 1mb down. Any ideas what could be causing this?

    Try this
    Adjust the MTU and MSS size in concentrator and client.
    Try these link for more info:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008015ce0e.html#1223423
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2286/products_user_guide_chapter09186a00803ef6c5.html

  • Windows 2012 Nodes - Slow CSV Performance - Need help to resolve my iSCSI issue configuration

    I spent weeks going over the forums and the net for any publications and advice on how to optimize iSCSI connections and i'm about to give up.  I really need some help in determining if its something i'm not configuring right or maybe its an equipment
    issue. 
    Hardware:
    2x Windows 2012 Hosts with 10 Nics (same NIC configuration) in a Failover Cluster sharing a CSV LUN. 
    3x NICs Teamed for Host/Live Migration (192.168.0.x)
    2x NICS teamed for Hyper-V Switch 1 (192.168.0.x)
    1x NIC teamed for Hyper-V Switch 2 (192.168.10.x)
    4x NICs for iSCSI traffic (192.168.0.x, 192.168.10.x, 192.168.20.x 192.168.30.x)
    Jumbo frames and flow control turned on all the NICs on the host.  IpV6 disabled.  Client for Microsoft Network, File/Printing Sharing Disabled on iSCSI NICs. 
    MPIO Least Queue selected.  Round Robin gives me an error message saying "The parameter is incorrect.  The round robin policy attempts to evenly distribute incoming requests to all processing paths. "
    Netgear ReadyNas 3200
    4x NICs for iSCSI traffic ((192.168.0.x, 192.168.10.x, 192.168.20.x 192.168.30.x)
    Network Hardware:
    Cisco 2960S managed switch - Flow control on, Spanning Tree on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for the .0 subnet
    Netgear unmanaged switch - Flow control on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for .10 subnet
    Netgear unmanaged switch - Flow control on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for .20 subnet
    Netgear unmanaged switch - Flow control on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for .30 subnet
    Host Configuration (things I tried turning on and off):
    Autotuning 
    RSS
    Chimney Offload
    I have 8 VMs stored in the CSV.  When try to load all 8 up at the same time, they bog down.  Each VM loads very slowly and when they eventually come up, most of the important services did not start.  I have to load
    them up 1 or 2 at a time.  Even then the performance is nothing like if they were loading up on the Host itself (VHD stored on the host's hdd).  This is what prompted me to add in more iSCSI connections to see if I can improve the VM's
    performance.  Even with 4 iSCSI connections, I feel nothing has changed.  The VMs still start up slowly and services do not load right.  If I distribute the load with 4 VMs on Host 1 and 4 VMs on Host 2, the load up
    times do not change. 
    As a manual test for file copy speed, I moved the cluster resources to Host 1 and copied a VM from the CSV and onto the Host.   The speed would start out around 250megs/sec and then eventually drop down to about 50/60 megs/sec.  If I turn
    off all iSCSI connections except one, it get the same speed.  I can verify from the Windows Performance Tab under Task Manager that all the NICS are distributing traffic evenly, but something is just limiting the flow.  Like what I stated on top,
    I played around with autotuning, RSS and chimney offload and none of it makes a difference. 
    The VMs have been converted to VHDx and to fixed size.  That did not help.   
    Is there something I'm not doing right?   I am working with Netgear support and they are puzzled as well.  The ReadyNas device should easily be able to handle it. 
    Please help!  I pulled my hair out over this for the past two months and I'm about to give up and just ditch clustering all together and just run the VMs off the hosts themselves. 
    George

    A few things...
    For starters, I recommend opening a case with Microsoft support.  They will be able to dig in and help you...
    Turn on the CSV Cache, it will boost your performance 
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/clustering/archive/2012/03/22/10286676.aspx
    A file copy has no resemblance of the unbuffered I/O a VM does... so don't use that as a comparison, as you are comparing apples to oranges.
    Do you see any I/O performance difference between the coordinator node and the non-coordinator nodes?  Basically, see which node owns the cluster Physical Disk resource... measure the performance.  Then move the Physical Disk resource for the
    CSV volume to another node, and repeat the same measure of performance... then compare them.
    Your IP addressing seems odd...  you show multiple networks on 192.168.0.x and also on 192.168.10.x.   Remember that clustering only recognizes and uses 1 logical interface per IP subnet.  I would triple check all your IP schemes...
    to ensure they are all different logical networks.
    Check you binding order
    Make sure you NIC drivers and NIC firmware are updated
    Make sure you don't have IPsec enabled, that will significantly impact your network performance
    For the iSCSI Software Initiator, when you did your connection... make sure you didn't do a 'Quick Connect'... that will do a wildcard and connect over any network.  You want to specify your dedicated iSCSI network
    No idea what the performance capabilities of the ReadyNas is...  this could all likely be associated with the shared storage.
    What speed NIC's are you using?   I hope at least 10 GB...
    Hope that helps...
    Elden
    Hi Elden,
    2. CSV is turned on, I have 4GB dedicated from each host to it.  With IOmeter running within the VMs, I do see the read speed jumped up 4-5x fold but the write speed stays the same (which according to the doc it should).  But even with the read
    speed that high, the VMs are not starting up quickly.  
    4. I do not see any difference with IO with coordinator and non coordinator nodes.  
    5.  I'm not 100% sure what your saying about my IPs.  Maybe if I list it out, you can help explain further.  
    Host 1 - 192.168.0.241 (Host/LM IP), Undefined IP on the 192.168.0.x network (Hyper-V Port 1), Undefined IP on the 192.168.10.x network (Hyper- V port 2), 192.168.0.220 (iSCSI 1), 192.168.10.10 (iSCSI2), 192.168.20.10(iSCSI 3), 192.168.30.10 (iSCSI 4)
    The Hyper-V ports are undefined because the VMs themselves have static ips.  
    0.220 host NIC connects with the .231 NIC of the NAS
    10.10 host NIC connects with the 10.100 NIC of the NAS
    20.10 host NIC connects with the 20.100 NIC of the NAS
    30.10 host NIC connects with the 30.100 NIC of the NAS
    Host 2 - 192.168.0.245 (Host/LM IP), Undefined IP on the 192.168.0.x network (Hyper-V Port 1), Undefined IP on the 192.168.10.x network (Hyper- V port 2), 192.168.0.221 (iSCSI 1), 192.168.10.20 (iSCSI2), 192.168.20.20(iSCSI 3), 192.168.30.20 (iSCSI 4)
    The Hyper-V ports are undefined because the VMs themselves have static ips.  
    0.221 host NIC connects with the .231 NIC of the NAS
    10.20 host NIC connects with the 10.100 NIC of the NAS
    20.20 host NIC connects with the 20.100 NIC of the NAS
    30.20 host NIC connects with the 30.100 NIC of the NAS
    6. Binding orders are all correct.
    7. Nic drivers are all updated.  Didn't check the firmware.
    8. I do not know about IPSec...let me look into it.  
    9. I did not do quick connect, each iscsi connection is defined using a specific source ip and specific target ip.  
    These are all 1gigabit nics, which is the reason why I have so many NICs...otherwise there would be no reason for me to have 4 iscsi connections.  

  • Problem Intalling hyper-v Windows 2012 R2 on a Windows 8.1 Pro machine

    First Try:
    I am trying to install hyper-v Windows server 2012 from the Microsoft site below on to a Windows 8.1 Pro using Hyper-V Manager. 
    The Windows 2012 R2 ISO I downloaded from the link at the bottom of the screen. 
    I am downloading and copying this ISO to CD.  In hyper-v manager, right pane, I am clicking New, Virtual Machine, Next, Name (2012 R2), check the box “Store the virtual machine in a different location (F:\Windows 2012 R2), which is
    a partition that will used for all my hyper-v OSs.  Click Next, select Generation 2, Next, Startup memory 512 with box checked “Use Dynamic Memory for this virtual machine, Next, Configure Network connection (chose my virtual switch I setup
    in Virtual Switch Manager, Next.  For Connect Hard Disk, I chose “Create virtual hard disk, and went with the defaults. Clicked Next, and in Installation Options, I chose “Install an operating system from a bootable image file (media Image
    file (iso) – browsed to my DVD device and chose the saved iso), and then clicked Finish button.
    The virtual machine “2012 R2” appeared in the off state.  I double clicked it to open the virtual machine, and clicked the start button. 
    Received Boot Failed.  EFI SCSI Device. 
    PXE Network using IPv4 ……..
    PXE-E18: Server response Timeout.
    Boot Failed.  EFI Network
    Boot Failed.  EFI SCSI Device.
    No Operating System was Loaded. 
    Press a key to retry the boot sequence…..
    http://www.microsoftvirtualacademy.com/product-training/windows-server
    Second Try:
    I did the same process but changed select Generation 2 to Generation 1, and browsed to the ISO saved on my HDD rather than from a CD. 
    This time the Windows 2012 installed, but came up with a blue screen with the time showing in big numbers, and the words “Press Ctrl+Alt+Delete to sign in. 
    When I clicked Ctrl-Alt-Del:  the PC screen cleared and showed selections (Lock, Switch User, Sign Out, Task Manager). 
    I tried to switch user to my Microsoft Account, but it only redisplayed the previous blue screen with time ect…
    Bill Thompson, [email protected]

    You mount the ISO file directly to the VM, stored on the local disk.
    If you mount the ISO and boot into a VM you should not get a logon prompt - you should get the ISO boot prompt to install and if you fail to respond the VHD is booted.
    I am suspecting you have a  corrupt download of the ISO.
    Brian Ehlert
    http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
    Learn. Apply. Repeat.

  • Windows 2012 Datacenter R2 - Network Connections Confusion

    I have recently created a 2012 Datacenter install with the goal to create virtualize test lab. 
    As part of the install two connections were created:
    1. Labeled 'Ethernet' with Hyper-V Extensible Virtual Switch protocol enabled.
    2 Labeled 'Network 2' vEthernet (....Controller - Virtual Switch) with the standard networking protocols enabled.
    3. Network 2 interface is connected to the local area network.
    Ethernet adapter vEthernet (Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller - Virtual Switch):
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Hyper-V Virtual Ethernet Adapter #2
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : BC-5F-F4-3B-11-EE
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.100(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 8.8.8.8
    8.8.4.4
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    I am confused with the purpose of the network connection "Ethernet" and Hyper-Virtual Switch protocol and how this relates the "network 2" interface. I uncertain which network connection is the physical connections.
    I have tried to research this with "windows 2012 datacenter network connection configuration, setup, and etc.",  the results are a lot of the complex examination of setting of Hyper-V implementation, clusters, DHCP, and etc.
    I hoping to locate information that will explain the fundamentals of these related technologies (tutorial, youtube videos, etc.).  Any helpful advice is welcome.

    Hi,
    Based on the information which you provide, you created an External virtual switch, which binds to the physical network adapter so that virtual machines can access a physical network.
    ->I am confused with the purpose of the network connection “Ethernet” and Hyper-Virtual Switch protocol and how this relates the “network 2” interface. I uncertain which network connection is the physical connections.
    ->Network 2 interface is connected to the local area network.
    Based on your description, I suppose that you encountered some problems with understanding virtual network switch. When we install Hyper-V and create an external virtual network, the management operating system uses a new virtual network
    adapter to connect to the physical network. The network connections consist of the original network adapter and the new virtual network adapter. The original physical network adapter does not have anything bound to it. However, the virtual network adapter
    has all of the standard protocols and services bound to it. Here, the “vEthernet” is the new virtual network adapter, and the “Ethernet” was the original physical network adapter. Hyper-V binds the Virtual Network Service Protocol to the physical network adapter
    when an external virtual network is created. So the “Ethernet” has the Hyper-V Extensible Virtual Switch only. The physical adapter was equal to a virtual switch at this moment, all networking traffic is routed though the virtual switch.
    And to the physical machine, due to the physical adapter is a virtual switch now, so the new virtual network adapter is its network adapter now. So we can see the all TCP/IP configurations of vEthernet are the same with the local area
    network.
    For more details about virtual network switch, please refer to the link below,
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd581798(v=WS.10).aspx
    Best Regards,
    Tina

  • Boot Failed. EFI SCSI Device 1. Hyper-V Windows 2012 R2 Preview

    Hello,
    I am new to Hyper-V. I installed Windows Server 2012 R2  Preview on a physical server and installed Hyper-V role on it.
    I am trying to install Windows 2008 R2 on Hyper-V as a guest OS. 
    From Hyper-V manager, I created a VM and supplied 2008 R2 ISO as a boot device.
    Windows 2008 R2 ISO is bootable. I have used the same ISO on VMware and it works.
    I connected the VM and powered on, but OS instalaltion doesn't start.
    I get error " Boot Failed. EFI SCSI Device 1." Below is th screen capture.
    How to fix this problem ?
    How do I go to Hyper-v VM BIOS settings ?
    How do I change the boot sequence for Hyper-V VM ?
    Thanks ! Jayawardhane

    I was getting the same error but with WINDOWS 2012 STD Edition.
    My case: I was trying to use the existing WINDOWS 2012 VHDX with Generation 2 Virtual Machine, as I wanted to make use of 'Virtual Hard Disk Sharing' feature which is only supported on SCSI Controller. But during boot, it looked for UEFI code, whereas
    I had created VHDX using BIOS boot partition. So I guess, In order to use 'VHD Sharing' feature, I have to convert boot partition to GPT which supports UEFI.
    If I use the Generation 1 virtual machine, and then change the VHDX Controller from IDE to SCSI from settings, I see the option 'VHD Sharing' getting enabled, but unfortunately the Generation 1 BIOS does not have support for SCSI only IDE.

  • Extremly poor network performance

    Hello all. First time post, please excuse any annoyances.
    I'm using a WRT300N Wireless-N Broadband Router connecting three (sometimes four) computers. Two wired and one (sometimes two) wireless, using 802.11G.
    After a long period of time or after a short period of extremely high use (usually bit-torrenting assorted files) my network performance crawls to a near stop. My laptop will show an "excellent" connection but the speed will be 1 Mbps. The wired computers still show a connection of 100 Mbps but cannot connect to anything, including the router (using the web configure site). All connections time out. This happens to all the computers connected at the time and the only cure I've found thus far is to restart the router and or modem. If you need any more information please ask. Below is the information of my router, computers hooked to the router, and the network connection coming in.
    Connection coming in the house:
    Comcast Cable. 6 Meg connection (download)
    Router:
    WRT300N Wireless-N Broadband Router
    Using the latest firmware (0.93.3)
    Using DHCP, Laptop1 and Desktop1 have reservations.
    Laptop1:
    Broadcom internal wireless 'card' running 802.11G
    Desktop 1:
    Intel NIC
    Desktop 2:
    Asus motherboard onboard NIC
    (occasional) Laptop2:
    Dell external wireless card running 802.11G

    I must apologize for one annoyance... the whole post. I skipped step one of posting by forgetting to use that handy-dandy "Search" box located just above this whole post deal, I apologize again. I've found (after searching) that this problem is actually quite common with the 300N and I assume it's a firmware issue, I then assume that Linksys is working day and night, sweating behind a monitor, sleepless and hungry because all they are doing is trying to resolve this issue... then again... you know what they say about 'assuming''.

  • Lenovo W540 poor network performance

    My company recently purchased a Lenovo W540 (Intel i7-4700MQ @ 2.4 Ghz, 16 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 pro 64-bit) for me to use when I am working remote. I have to say that this thing has been an albatross from day one. While it generally performs poorly, the wifi is the worst I have ever experienced. The W540 can only hit a fraction of the network speeds of my 4-year-old Dell Latitude E6400 (1.1 Mbps compared to 2.7 Mpbs on average). The connectivity is very unreliable and I am constantly losing my VPN and VoIP connections.
    I have updated all of the drivers available from Lenovo and Intel as well as removed most of the bloatware pre-installed from Lenovo. Prior to doing so I could only manage .6 Mbps on a good day - using my tethered 3G phone was faster and more reliable.
    I have contacted support twice to gain assistance. Their best offer was to have me drive an hour to the nearest service center for support.
    I am at my wit's end and would appreciate any assistance you can offer before I send this back to Lenovo along with a jar of vasaline.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Try uninstalling the wifi drivers from device manager before re-installing the latest version. My Intel 6300 card was sticking at 54mbps the other day too, and this seemed to fix it.
    W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
    X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
    Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

  • SOLVED:Poor networking performance (Slow site lookup)

    I am dual booting with Windoze on the same machine. Websurfing performance on Arch is poor, and I can't figure out why. Windoze surfing with Firefox is instantaneous, whereas on Arch, I get "looking up http:www.google.com....................." for a good 5 seconds, sometimes 10 or 20 seconds, or more.
    It will be fine for a few minutes, and then I get pretty bad stalls like that quite often.
    Heres my rc.conf networking section:
    lo="lo 127.0.0.1"
    eth0="dhcp"
    INTERFACES=(lo eth0)
    # Routes to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # Declare each route then list in ROUTES
    # - prefix an entry in ROUTES with a ! to disable it
    gateway="default gw 192.168.0.1"
    ROUTES=(!gateway)
    And my daemons:
    DAEMONS=(@syslog-ng @hal @network @netfs @crond @alsa @fam @portmap kdm)
    Any ideas?

    lucke wrote:
    Sometimes ipv6 causes problem.
    You might try adding "alias net-pf-10 off" to /etc/modprobe.conf.
    Tried this, and it did not work. Same lag when "looking up" sights.
    High|ander wrote:Try to use your ISP:s DNS (better then letting your router redirect every DNS request)
    Snarkout wrote:I'd add those entries to resolv.conf and see what shakes loose -
    ralvez wrote:I concur with Snarkout.
    The way I have it set up in my system, and works like a charm, is that I have the nameserver set in the router and in my system.
    Ok, this seems to have worked. I plugged the DNS ip entries into the router and my resolv.conf, but DHCPD rewrites the resolv.conf on each reboot. I will consult the wiki to correct that, but even with just the DNS info in the router alone, I tried it out for a good 10 minutes and it was zippy fast, just like Windoze and PCLinuxOS (on my other HD).
    I will wait a day before renaming the thread as "SOLVED", so I can test ouit the results more thoroughly.
    Now, can anyone explain why it works fast under Windoze and PCLinuxOS, but Arch needs the DNS settings? Or is it just one of those weird unexplainable things?
    I am using a D-Link router, if it matters. (IIRC, some routers actually use Linux.)
    :shock:

  • Poor network performance on wired ethernet port and airport

    I'm using Leopard 10.5.1 on a home network comprised of a new, fully up-to-date (firmware wise) D-link wireless router and a couple ethernet hubs. I initially had problems because of old router firmware, but buying the new router and making sure firmware was up-to-date seems to have solved the connection problems. What I now experience is that whichever network cennection I am using, wireless or wired ethernet port, will slow down so slow that it's impossible to get any web content, upload files to my local server, or sent emails with any kind of attachment. Turning off the connection I am using, either wired ethernet or airport, and switching to the other solves the problem for a short time, usually a couple days or so. Then that connection with slow down and I have to switch back - again solving the problem. So to keep my network connection alive, I have to keep switching back and forth between the wired ethernet and the airport connection.
    The rest of my network consists of several Windows machines including a Windows 2000 server. None of these devices ever have any problems with network access.
    I've tried playing with the advanced settings with no luck. Does anyone know of a specific setting that might be the culprit?

    Hi ,
    Maybe you can try to disable checksum offloading and jumbo frames on the Physical NIC (ESX platform) to check result .
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Poor network performance with Websockets running on apple device

    I am working on an HTML/Javascript running on mobile devices that is communicating with a Qt/C++ application running on a PC. Both the mobile device and the PC are on a local network. The communication between the HTML page (client) and the C++ app (server) is done using Websockets.
    The HTML page is a remote control for the C++ application, so it is needed to have a low latency connection between the mobile device and the PC.
    When using any non-Apple device as a client, data is sent to a rate between 60 to 120 frames/sec, which is totally acceptable. When using an Apple device, this rate falls to 3-4 frames/sec. I also checked ping times (Websocket implementation, not a ping command from command line). They are acceptable (1-5 ms) for Apple devices as long as the device is not transmitting data. Whenever it transmits data, this ping time raises to 200ms.
    Looking from the Javascript side, the Apple devices always send data at a consistent rate of 60 frames/sec, as any other devices do. However, on the server side, only 3 to 4 of these 60 frames are received when the client is an Apple device.
    Does anyone have any idea on what can be happening?
    Here is my Javascript code :
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
            var wsUri = document.URL.replace("http", "ws");
            var output;
            var websocket;
            function init()
                output = document.getElementById("output");
                wsConnect();
            function wsConnect()
                console.log("Trying connection to " + wsUri);
                try
                    output = document.getElementById("output");
                    websocket = new WebSocket(wsUri);
                    websocket.onopen = function(evt)
                            onOpen(evt)
                    websocket.onclose = function(evt)
                            onClose(evt)
                    websocket.onmessage = function(evt)
                            onMessage(evt)
                    websocket.onerror = function(evt)
                            onError(evt)
                catch (e)
                    console.log("Exception " + e.toString());
            function onOpen(evt)
                alert("Connected to " + wsUri);
            function onClose(evt)
                alert("Disconnected");
            function onMessage(evt)
                alert('Received message : ' + evt.data);
            function onError(evt)
                alert("Error : " + evt.toString());
            function doSend(message)
                websocket.send(message);
            window.addEventListener("load", init, false);
    </script>
    Data is sent from Javascript side using dosend() function.

    What version of websocket is your server using? That is pretty much on the bleeding edge of things. It looks like you need to use RFC6455 and iOS6 and it should work fine.
    Thanks for the post. I didn't know about websockets. Very interesting.

  • Poor network performance in busy areas of San Francisco

    Verizon LTE coverage seems to be very poor in certain parts of San Francisco. The connection seems ok at 2 or 3 bars on 4g, but data connections are very slow. In particular along 18th street between Church and Castro, and Castro Street from Market to 20th, and finally the North East side of Corona Heights park. I have a Galaxy S5, I've tried resetting a few times. Also, I've been walking with others on verizon that have the same issue, as well as people on other carriers that didn't. Any hope of seeing better coverage in the near future in those areas?  There are several people considering switching over this.

    Post a URL so we can test the page.
    My "guess" is that Flash is the video format and Snow Leopard (10.6) actually installs an "out of date" version (fixed with the 10.6.1 update).
    http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/
    Test your install at the link above.

  • High Network Utilization on HeartBeat and LiveMigration networks - Windows 2012 R2 Hyper-V cluster

    Hi all,
    I have just setup a fresh Windows 2012 R2 Hyper-V cluster with 4 nodes.
    Config:
    Network:
    2 x Networks for iSCSI
    1 x VM network 1
    1 x VM network 2
    1 x Heartbeat
    1 x LiveMigration
    Disks:
    5 GB = Quorum
    2 x 2.99 TB (Deduplication enabled)
    The problem I am getting is that HeartBeat and LiveMigration (both configured with Cluster Only traffic) have alot of traffic on them even though no LiveMigration (the only card configured for LiveMigration) is going on.
    All network configuration is the same as it was in Windows 2008 R2 SP1 cluster which these machines where running before (not upgrade, fresh install and migration) and did not have this "problem".
    Has anyone experienced this or have a solution to this?
    Regards,
    Thorir
    thorir

    Hi Thorir,
    According to your discription , you can try to monitor and analyse the traffic of LM via network monitor for troubleshooting .
    Here is the links for downloading and using network monitor  :
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=4865
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc723623.aspx
     Any further information please feel free to let us know.
    Hope this helps
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Windows 2012 R2 hyper-v network unable to connect to outside resources

    Today, I went and upgraded a Windows 2008 R2 machine to 2012 R2.  I did a clean install and have never seen this problem before in this fashion.  It is a HP 370G6 with an HP NC375I quad card.  Only 1 adapter is in use, so it is not teamed. 
    After installing, none of my VM's will communicate to outside resources.  I got the Windows 2012 R2 update package from HP dated 4/14.  My virtual switch manager is set to Allow management operating system to share this adapter.  The adapter
    type is set to External.  After playing around with 1 guest, I finally have it communicating with the rest of the network.  However, my other guests will not.  I have checked all IP's multiple times, no differences but the last octet. 
    I can not figure out what is allowing my 1 guest to now communicate, but the others to not.  It is driving me crazy!  I have tried adding and removing the adapter several times, and also tried using the Legacy NIC to no avail

    Hi,
    The external 
    virtual switch vm can can’t access the outside resource issue we found most of them were pointing to the VMQ, we can try to disable the VMQ, here is the steps:
    Powershell command:
    Disable-NetAdapterVmq –Name NIC_CARD_NAME
    You can refer to the following article for more about the VMQ:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj130893.aspx
    Hope this helps.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adapter Modules in PI 7.0

    Hi All, I am using PI 7.0 SP 9. So in my case I am not able to use adapter module. (a) Is there any other alternative  to  adapter module as per the requirement if I am using PI 7.0 ? (b) In case of File-RFC-File ,how can I do the things without usin

  • How can I get rid of posts when there is no little x to click on?

    I was in Farmville Freaks and clicked on share and now it's on my home page and can't get it off because there's now little x beside of it to click on.

  • Purchase Group Default

    Hello All, Standard SRM has this functionality to default a purchase group based on product category and organization ID. Is it possible to default the purchase group in the shopping cart for ERP material numbers when shopped from Interna Materials/S

  • Only getting 160 characters in texts

    this happend to me the 2nd day i have had this phone..if i get a text that is more than 160 characters, i only get the first part of the text and not the 2nd, is there anything to do to make it so i can get all my my text and not just the first part?

  • New Spanish channles?

    Is there any chance to add SUR PERU to your spanish line up?I've seen forums asking this for A WHILE and no reply from your side.