Hyperion 11.1.3 supported environment - Windows 2003 64-bit

We are planning our migration from Windows 2003 SP1 32 bit with Hyperion 9.3.1 to Windows 2003 64bit (and whatever SP is supported) with Hyperion 11.1.3
In reviewing the oracle support doc I came across exceptions for using Windows 64 bit with 11
1. NOT SUPPORTED FOR: Data Integration Management, Production Reporting Teradata Engine.
2. EXCEPTION: Data Relationship Management and FDM do not support Oracle Access Manager, Oracle Application Server Single Sign-On, and Oracle Identity Manager.
3. 32-BIT BINARIES ONLY FOR: Data Relationship Management, EPM Workspace Services, FDM, Financial Reporting Services, Interactive Reporting Services, Shared Services (embedded Native Directory OpenLDAP service), Smart Search, and Strategic Finance.
4. FDM and Strategic Finance cannot be deployed on the same computer where Financial Management (64-bit) and Performance Management Architect (64-bit) are deployed.
I am more concerned with #3. Does this mean that those services cannot run on the 64bit machine OR that they can run on 64bit but in 32bit mode only
JTS

Hi,
It means they are only 32bit binaries but they do work on a 64bit environment.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

  • Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers with Windows 2003 forest functional level Supported after Windows 2003 support ends in July 2015

    Hi
    Anyone knows whether Windows 2008 R2 domain controllers with Windows 2003 forest functional level will still be Supported after Windows 2003 support ends in July 2015 ?
    Thanks

    When Windows Server 2003 support ends, you should not have a Windows Server 2003 Domain Controller running if you would like to be supported by Microsoft. This means that there will be no reason to have a DFL or FFL that is lower than Windows Server 2008.
    So, if you are keeping Windows Server 2003 FFL to keep DCs running Windows Server 2003 then this is not supported.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Support for Windows 2003 on AGS 2.1

    I've been trying to find out if AGS2.1 is supported on Windows 2003 and 2003 SP1. The installation and configuration guide document for AGS 2.0 states that the minimum system requirements are either Windows 2000 Server or NT 4.0 Server with SP6a.
    Would greatly appreciate if anyone can confirm if support extends to Windows 2003 and 2003 SP1 as well.
    Thanks
    Richard

    I am interested in the same thing. How about windows server 2008? Richard, did you ever get an answer??

  • Windows 2008? Mainstream Support of Windows 2003 ends13.07.2010

    Hello,
    Window Server 2008 for TVN is not supported at present - does any one know a date?
    Mainstream Support of Windows 2003 is finished at 13. Juli 2010.
    Afterwards there is "Extended Support".....
    Best regards
    Jürgen

    Hi Jürgen,
    I was in Nakisa HQ a couple of weeks ago and they said there was no date yet for this. It has to go through some certain tests in order to be certified on this platform. It may work but there is unlikely to be any support for any issues that are OS related.
    Cheers,
    Luke

  • Enterprise System 5 support for Windows 2003 server

    Hi,
    Can you tell me if it is possible to run Sun Java Enterprise System 5 on a windows server and get the portal server to work?
    Weare currently using JBoss ... and not very keen on it as a portal server.
    I tried installing ES5 but was unable to get the portal server to play, then i read something about no support for windows 2003 in ES5.
    Can someone confirm if this is true, unfortunately I am tied into using a windows server for lots of reasons. Is the download for ES4 still available? I believe Portal 6.0 instead of 7 is still ok for windows Server 2003 ?
    If Portal 7.0 will play with windows, is there a guide somewhere that you can point me to as I am totally new to portals and could use a bit of an idiots guide.
    Any info welcome !!
    Cheers

    The support for Sun Java System Portal Server on Windows in Java Enterprise System 5 is limited to evaluation and development only. The Windows distribution for Portal Server (PS 7.1 Update 2) is provided as a pre-configured install. To install it, you unzip the file, and run a small setup script to change the hostname information. The pre-configured installation is setup with a fixed install location, ports, etc. so it is not really suitable for a deployment for that reason. Once installed, all of the functionality is there otherwise except the ability to patch the system.
    Note: I just tried going through the download links, and there is something broken in the Sun download center. I've sent an internal notification about this.

  • Maximum User Accounts supported by Windows-2003 server

    I want to know the maximum limit of User Accounts supported by Window 2003 Server Logically. I think physically it depends upon Hardware and network infrastructure. So want to know logical limit. I heard about window 2000, that it supports near about 16000
    and NT server 4.0 supports 40000 User accounts. But there is no source on the web to know about win2k3's Maximum Users account limit...
    Thanks...

    This article documents the scalability limits of Active Directory, including W2k3:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc756101.aspx
    Per the article, the maximum number of security principals (total of all users, groups, computers, and all objects with SIDs ever created) in Windows Server 2003 AD is 2^30 or 1,073,741,823.
    Richard Mueller - MVP Directory Services

  • Migrating Windows 2003 (64 bit) to Windows 2008

    Hi Experts!!!!!
    Recently we have been facing performance issue in our CRM 2007 development system. particulary with Tcode CRMD_ORDER. We have analysed from all corners like processor (4 processor), RAM (12 GB), User load (40 users), memory parameters, Network load, and also the EWA report from solution manager which shows that performance factor as green inidcator. But, while checking the load by transaction wise CRMD_ORDER is taking lot of time. We also run the DB Check and statistics update regularly.  So, I presumed that probelm is with CRMD_ORDER tcode and posted the issue with SAP where it has come up with a solution to migrate OS from Windows 2003 to Windows 2008 as this is a issue with Windows 2003 server as per notes 1320013 and 1316558.
    Now, what I would like to know is migrate from windows 2003 (64 bit) server to Windows 2008 then we need to follow system copy process only right. If  yes then we need to follow homogeneous copy method only as this is same windows environment only or have to go with heterogenous copy. Also, if I do a homogenous copy then I need to take the backup and also export the data from current 2003 server and then clean it completely. After that need to install 2008 server and then install SAP freshly and then restore the data from backup or system copy method. Is this right or is there any other better way. Also, kindly suggest if you find any advantages or disadvantages with this process or migration.
    Kind Regards,
    Sharath

    Hi, yes you can do standart homogeneous system copy. First of all you need to test your scenario (if it are Productive server)
    Create good backup and after try to do TEST system copy on installed win 2008, (this will show for you all
    possible errors and surprises. But note SAP does'nt  support current the windows 2008 R2 , more information -->
    SAP on Microsoft Windows
    Regards.

  • Oracle (64 bit) on Windows 2003 ( 64 bit )

    Hi Guys,
    Im trying to install Oracle Release 2 (9.2.0.2) on Windows 2003 (64 bit) , but failed. It pops up following error.
    "The image file setup.exe is valid, but is for a machine type other than the current machine."
    Can somebody help on this.
    rgds
    -ruwan

    If, on the next page http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/oracle9i/htdocs/win64soft.html
    you click on product certification information, you can see "Certify - Oracle's Certification Matrices".
    If you choose "View Certifications by Platform", etc, and you arrive here http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html
    If you choose "View Certifications by Product", etc, and you arrive here http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html, and you can read "32-bit/64-bit Information, read this http://www.oracle.com/technology/support/metalink/index.html.
    As I well understand, on EM64T, install Windows 2003 32-bits, after what you can install Oracle 9.2.0.2 64-bits.
    If anybody can confirm it...
    Nicolas.

  • R12 Cloning from Windows 2003 64 bit to Windows 2008 R2 64 bit

    Dear Gurus,
    I have a 12.1.3 applications and 11.2.0.2 database running on Windows 2003 *64 bit*. Now I need to perform a migration from Windows 2003 to Windows 2008 R2 64 bit. Please confirm if we can directly perform a clone from 2003 64 bit to 2008 R2 64 bit using Rapid clone?
    Thanks in advance!
    -Khan

    We are in Windows 2003 32bit on Applications and Windows 2003 64 bit for database. This architecture was certified as per Support which we had confirmed via SR.Correct.
    BTW the reason for raising this thread is that the clone failed for db Tier at a very first go with the below error where it states unknown OS Windows 2008 R2.
    E:\TEST\oracle\11.2.0\appsutil\clone\bin\..\jre\bin\java.exe -Xmx600M -cp E:\TES
    T\oracle\11.2.0\appsutil\clone\jlib\java;E:\TEST\oracle\11.2.0\appsutil\clone\jl
    ib\xmlparserv2.jar;E:\TEST\oracle\11.2.0\appsutil\clone\jlib\ojdbc5.jar oracle.a
    pps.ad.context.CloneContext -e E:\TEST\oracle\11.2.0\appsutil\clone\bin\..\conte
    xt\db\CTXORIG.xml -validate -pairsfile C:\Users\APDF38~1.ADM\AppData\Local\Temp\
    2\adpairsfile_2800.lst -stage E:\TEST\oracle\11.2.0\appsutil\clone 2> C:\Users\
    APDF38~1.ADM\AppData\Local\Temp\2\adcfgclone_2800.err && echo %ERRORLEVEL% > C:\
    Users\APDF38~1.ADM\AppData\Local\Temp\2\adcfgclone_2800.res
    RC-20011: Fatal: Failed to retrieve OS name. The following OS string returned fr
    om System.getProperty("os.name") is unknown: Windows Server 2008 R2
    Can't open Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError:
    Invalid argumentPlease see these docs.
    How to Overcome Windows 2008 Being Unrecognised by AutoConfig and rapid Clone? [ID 1270782.1]
    Running adbldxml.pl On Windows 2008 R2 Dbtier Fails On Unknown: Windows Vista [ID 1263136.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • ECC 6.0 and Sol Man 7.0 support on Windows Server 32 bit OS

    Dear Experts,
    I have read that SAP is moving towards 64 bit implementation.
    I have to install ECC 6.0 and Solution Manager 7.0 on a Windows Server. We have yet to purchase the hardware and to decide the hardware config I need answers to the following.
    Is ECC 6.0 and Solution Manager 7.0 supported on Windows 2003 server 32 bit OS?
    Should I buy 64 bit hardware for both or should I go for 32 bit hardware?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Shailendra

    > No Need to buy 64bit hardware.
    You're aware that successor releases are only available on 64bit? And also the fact, that certain functionality may not work in Solution Manager (e. g. activation of BI cubes etc.)? If he wants to go for EHP4 on ERP he needs to install EHP3 first and then EHP4 using SAINT - which needs a lot of downtime.
    SAP recommends using only 64bit system and I can just HIGHLY support that:
    Note 931024 - FAQ: 64-bit platforms for Windows
    <...>
    As of basis release 6.20 productive use of 32-bit platforms is not recommended.
    <...>
    and
    Note 1280759 - SAP recommends only 64-Bit Windows for SAP Appl. Servers
    <...>
    Therefore, we recommend that you only use 64-bit for your SAP system. Use Windows 64-bit also on small test and demo systems to become familiar with it. Otherwise you will end up wasting a lot of time and money optimizing your ABAP or Java application servers to run on 32-bit.
    <...>
    Almost all servers produced in the last two years are 64bit capable - so I'd check if the server really doesn't support a 64bit OS.
    Markus

  • Issue with SAP Authentication in a Windows 2003 64 Bits Server

    Hi Experts
        I have an issue in a Windows 2003 64 Bits Server in CMC when i'm in the authentication section i choose SAP the Role Import works fine and I can see the Users Group from SAP BW but the users don't appear.
        I try the same thing in a Windows 2003 32 Bits with the same parameters and works fine i can see de User Groups and The Users from the same BW Server.
    I Think i could be a problem with the 64 bits server the issue is the users from SAP BW are not imported.
    Regards Marvin Soto.

    Hi Ingo,
                  we have some thing similar issue. can you please help us out.
    We Imported users and in options we selected concurrent and every thing worked fine up to 1 month and then automatically our license key say you have only 2 named users. we have a license key for 100 named users now. do we need to delete all the concurrent users from sap now and we need to re-import them by selecting named in options tab of sap. what is the work around for this. i tested by changing the one of the sap user profile to named instead of concurrent, then i am able to login to infoview using sap credentials but when i open a report its says you don't have enough license to perform this operation. can i know why is this happening.
                Environment:
                                       BOBJ XI 3.1, SUN SOLARIS, SAP INTEGRATION KIT.
    Thanks,
    SK.
    Edited by: Siva Vallabhaneni on May 27, 2009 3:28 PM

  • 9i Lite on windows 2003 64 bit os

    hi..
    is Oracle9i Lite Release 5.0.2.8.0 supported on windows 2003 server 64 bit...???
    where can i find the 9i lite software for 64 bit os??

    Actually, 5.0.2.10 isn't supported anymore. EOL was February 2007 timeframe. It should work, but it is just not supported.

  • MLR.EXE on Windows 2003 64 BIT using WOW64

    Hi
    I have installed a SAP SCM 5.0 system on Windows 2003 64 BIT/MS SQL 2000.
    The SCM consultant needs the MLR.EXE exe installed on the OS for the RFC connection 'CALL_MLR', I have followed OSS Note 301569, copied the exe to the OS in the /usr/sap/<SID> directory, but when I run the exe i get the error :
    <b>'The application has failed to start because LIBRFC32.DLL was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this'</b>
    The note mentions you have to run WOW64 environment for 32 bit applications on 64 BIT OS, we are on Windows 2003 64 BIT SP1, so we should have WOW64  environment, the documentation I have read on WOW64 says it should run seamlessly as WOW64 hands the program as the address space in the program shows its a 32 BIT application.
    LIBRFC32.DLL is in the C:\WINDOWS\system32 folder, this is in the path on the server, so it should be found.
    I've ran the MLR.EXE on my 32 BIT Windows XP desktop to check its not a corrupted version, and it works ok, so its definitely a compatibility problem with Windows 2003 64 BIT.
    Has anyone setup MLR.EXE in a scenario like this, or has run 32 BIT Applications on Windows 2003 64 BIT using WOW64?
    Thanks.

    I believe the mlr.exe needs the correct version of 32bit librfc32.dll. 32bit program cannot call a 64bit dll file.  So you'll probably need to find that particular librfc32 file. It's probably a non-unicode 32bit file too.  I believe you can find  one at SWDC in service marketplace. Just do a search in all categories for librfc32.dll.  Heres a note about librfc32.
    Note 336693 - Replacing the librfc32.dll on a Win 32 Platform
    Wondering why the librfc32.dll from your ECC didn't work in the other system. Maybe there's another copy of librfc32.dll in your directory path that mlr.exe found and not the one in your \windows\system32 directory.
    I guess I would try and find out how many librfc32.dll and if not, try downloading those from SWDC and test those out.
    Good luck.
    regards,
    Laurence...
    disclaimer:
    The content of this message is my personal opinion only and, the statements I make here in no way represent my employer's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of my employer on this matter.
    Not sure if your

  • CF8 on Windows 2003 64-bit  (virtual?)

    We are trying to bring up a new Windows 2003 64-bit server,
    running both ColdFusion 8 and .NET Runtime 2.0
    We are having multiple problems, and not much of anything is
    running, and I am beginning to wonder whether there is a problem
    with 32-bit CF8 and 64-bit .NET trying to run on IIS 6 at the same
    time?
    Does anyone have this kind of setup sucessfully installed?
    Would like to get a few pointers.
    Alternately, thinking about running a 32-bit virtual server
    on the 64-bit OS, and installing CF8 in that virtual server.
    Does this make sense for a PRODUCTION server?
    Rick Colman

    ColdFusion 8.01 is in beta currently and it has 64 bit
    windows support. Why not give it a try at
    prerelease.adobe.com?

  • Link to downlaod 10.2.0.4 for windows 2003 64-bit

    hi, can you help me to provide link to download 10.2.0.4 for windows 2003 64-bit?
    Thanks

    On the OTN site there's a download page with 10.2.0.4 for Windows Vista x64 and Server 2008 x64, but for "plain" Windows x64, I see only the base 10.2.0.1 release.
    So you would need a Patch Set for 10.2.0.1 -> 10.2.0.4.
    For retrieving/being allowed to use Patch Set releases, you need Support (or SULS as the service is called in contractual terms) and a support web account.
    Edited by: orafad on Jan 7, 2009 1:00 PM

Maybe you are looking for