Hyperion - best practice architecture

we are planning to use the hyperion 11x (HFM and Planning and Financial Reports) and would like to know the best practice architecture and the oracle doucment id on this.
any help would be much appreciated
Thanks

If you want to understand the architecture recommended by Oracle then have a look at the standard deployment guide at - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/nav/portal_1.htm
If you don't want to go down the recommended route then I suggest getting in a consultant to discuss your possible options.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

Best practice architecture Wireless security

What is the best practice architecture for wireless to the wire network?
Use AP to Firewall and it to a router using RADIUS?
It apply to Control is a safety?
What models Cisco recomend (Hard and Soft?)
Is any place in Cisco that I can use to see Architecture recomendations that integrete Wireless, Radio (Microwave) and Voice over IP com-plete system?

using one of the 802.1x types (i.e. LEAP, EAP-FAST, PEAP) with WPAv2 (AES encryption). Too bad that there are not many wireless adapters support AES.
All Cisco wireless product support AES in 12.3(2)JA recently.
Also, you may want to configure WDS for radio management.

Teststand best practices architecture for communicating with TCP instruments

Hi,
I am using Teststand 2014 and LabVIEW 2013 SP1 as the module adapter.
My Teststand sequence file includes communication with 3-5 different instruments via TCP/IP.
Such as Spectrum analyzer, generator and other RF measurement devices.
There are many steps located in subsequences that implement code to communicated with these devices whether to fetch , query or write.
What is the best architecture to implement this program ?
As I can see it there are many possibilities, such as :
1. Launching a subsequence as a new thread in the Sequence Setup. This subsequence calls a VI that dynamically register for events/queue that can be launched from any step. (in this case there is a VI running in the background that can perform Write/Read/Qurey to the instrument and he is triggered from any step using an event or dequeue element)
This option can be duplicated for any instrument or only once for all of the instrument with prioritizing the event queue.
2. Creating a communication reference in the Setup of the Main Sequence. And passing it to any step that need it. (there is also the question how to pass this reference… in Teststand globals or in LabVIEW queue).
another 2 small questions that I encountered -
Is using LabVIEW queues and notifiers in TS steps and obtaining their reference (in the LabVIEW code) by name is considered best practices ?
If I would like to run only one VI in a new thread, should I use a new subsequnce and set it as a new thread or use the Run VI Asynchronously ? what are the differences ?

I use Action Engines to hold my VISA Sessions and just write my LabVIEW VIs to use those to send commands and read data. Any returned data can be analyzed in the VI or passed on to TestStand as a step result. You just need a sequence to run at start up to initialize your Action Engines and another one to close them.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

SQL Server Best Practices Architecture UCS and FAS3270

Hey thereWe are moving from EMC SAN and physical servers to NetApp fas3270 and virtual environment on Cisco UCS B200 M3.Traditionally - Best Practices for SQL Server Datbases are to separate the following files on spearate LUN's and/or VolumesDatabase Data filesTransaction Log filesTempDB Data filesAlso I have seen additional separations for...
System Data files (Master, Model, MSDB, Distribution, Resource DB etc...)IndexesDepending on the size of the database and I/O requirements you can add multiple files for databases. The goal is provide optimal performance. The method of choice is to separate Reads & Writes, (Random and Sequential activities)If you have 30 Disks, is it better to separate them? Or is better to leave the files in one continous pool? 12 Drives RAID 10 (Data files)10 Drives RAID 10 (Log files)8 Drives RAID 10 (TempDB)Please don't get too caught up on the numbers used in the example, but place focus on whether or not (using FAS3270) it is better practice to spearate or consolidate drives/volumes for SQL Server DatabasesThanks!

Hi Michael,It's a completely different world with NetApp! As a rule of thumb, you don't need separate spindles for different workloads (like SQL databases & logs) - you just put them into separate flexible volumes, which can share the same aggregate (i.e. a grouping of physical disks).For more detailed info about SQL on NetApp have a look at this doc:http://www.netapp.com/us/system/pdf-reader.aspx?pdfuri=tcm:10-61005-16&m=tr-4003.pdfRegards,Radek

Remote Monitoring Latest Best Practice Architecture

Hi guys,
I've developed very few remote monitoring systems in the past. One of them was using a PXI RT and the rest are cRIO. The approach and architecture were based from some of the things I've read from ni.com and this forum. In the process, there were much difficulties and some extensive troubleshooting exercises that I need to do. The results, while the system work and meet the user's requirements, it didn't meet my own expectation. I was hoping that the system can be expanded (adding more cRIO or PXI) with much ease and little or no re-programming effort. Anyway, 2-3 years have passed and opportunities with similar requirements has emerged. So, I would like to get started to think about the architecture at an early stage (ie. now).
In my past systems, I've used Shared Variables (SV) a lot - and it gave much much headache too. Some of the troubles I had were:
1. I can't decide whether to lump all SV in one library and host them in one system, or to separate them into various libraries and systems... neither do I know what's the best approach, as I've read too many 'suggestions' and 'advices',
2. Some of the SV are from custom control and the control is type-def. When running the VI in RT with these SV in development platform, everything works smoothly but when I compiled and deploy, the program didn't run. After extensive troubleshooting, I found out that this had something to do with these SV - because when I removed the type-def from the custom controls and recreate my SV, everything worked fine. I suspect this may have something to do with how I deploy but after I tried several approach, the problem still persist.
3. The best and most common of all is unstable connectivity - it work today but that doesn't guarantee it will work tomorrow. When the host PC changes, the same problems resurfaced again. I read somewhere that I need to read or interface with the .alias file but this work some times and other times, the same problem persist.
Attached is the most common architecture that I've used. I would like to move away from SV as much as possible. If the application is 1:1, there's no problem as I can easily use TCP/IP & Network Stream. However, my doubts and headache comes when the RT:Host communication is either 1:N, N:N or N:1. I've read in ni.com and found out that there are various new approach to this, such as AMC (derivated from UDP), Web Services (or was it HTTP).
I really appreciate it if you guys share your thoughts and advices here, please?
Shazlan
Attachments:
Remote Mon Sys - Arch.pdf ‏27 KB

Nick,
I was not talking about the mgmt0 interface. The vlan that you are testing will have a link blocked between the two 3750 port-channel if the root is on the nexus vPC pair.
Logically your topology is like this:
| |
| Nexus Pair |
3750-1-----------------------3750-2
Since you have this triangle setup one of the links will be in blocking state for any vlan configured on these devices.
When you are talking about vPC and L3 are you talking about L3 routing protocols or just intervaln routing.
Intervlan routing is fine. Running L3 routing protocols over the peer-link and forming an adjaceny with an router upstream using L2 links is not recommended. Teh following link should give you an idea about what I am talking here:
http://bradhedlund.com/2010/12/16/routing-over-nexus-7000-vpc-peer-link-yes-and-no/
HSRP is fine.
As mentioned tracking feature purpose is to avoid block hole of traffic. It completely depends on your network setup. Don't think you would be needing to track all the interfaces.
JayaKrishna

Webinar Invitation: Join us for "SiteStudio Best Practices"

<strong>SiteStudio Best Practices</strong>
Join us for a Webinar on November 13
Space is limited.
Reserve your Webinar seat now at:
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/789489722
Joe Duane is a senior principal product manager at Oracle, and former senior principal consultant. As a consultant, Joe spent 8 years architecting and deploying Web Content Management solutions for clients. This presentation will focus on best practice architecture and development with the 10gr3 release of Site Studio.
Title:
SiteStudio Best Practices
Date:
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Time:
12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CST
After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the Webinar.
System Requirements
PC-based attendees
Required: Windows 2000, XP Home, XP Pro, 2003 Server, Vista
Macintosh-based attendees
Required: Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) or newer

Hi,
was there some kind of document formulated upon conclusion of this webinar? I was unable to attend, so I'm wondering if there is anything I can read on Best Practices for SS or any link to related information would be useful.
Thank you,
G

Best practice to extract data from Hyperion Enterprise 5.5

We are looking into extracting high-level data from our Hyperion Enterprise 5.5 and am in the process of researching what are the best practices to do that. I am reading the docs for the APIs that I can call from VB6. I am also interested if there are available Java APIs out there.Thanks in advance and Happy Holidays to everyone!Angelito [email protected]

The easiest is using HAL (Hyperion Application Link). I have used HAL to extract data, organizations, account, subs, entities, etc.

EFP and Intranet Portal - Best Practices for architecture

Hi All,
   We are planning to create a portal for our partners (b2b scenario). This portal will provide anonymous and user specific access. We also have a intranet portal with ESS and MSS. I have some doubts around implementing EFP and Intranet portal.
   1) What is the best practice solution architecture around portal instances? Is it suggested to implement both intranet and internal portals on same portal instance? Do you implement them as 2 seperate instances (and 2 seperate boxes) one for intranet and another for internet?
   2) There are couple of functions shared between inranet and internet portals. Has any one attempted   a FPN connection between a internet portal and intranet portal?
   3) What is the best practices around an external portal connecting to ECC directly?
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Hi Pallayya,
         We are implementing a similar kind of thing for our client.I can explain that so you find some glimpse out of it.
We have decided twp ways.
1) We are having one instance of the portal that will be accessed both in Intranet & Internet.We are using two different URL for intranet & internet.We have a reverse proxy in the picture also,coz it will increase the security of the portal in the Internet.The reverse proxy will be available in the DMZ Zone.We have integrated ECC & BW with the portal and some web dynpro application(For intranet only).
Now the user comes from the Internet will hit the reverse proxy first->then it will go to EP Server->in EP it will be decided which kind of request client is asking ->
If it is a ECC request->Portal Server sends back the request to Reverse Proxy->RP will send it to web dispatcher->Then it will go to ECC.
If it is a BW request ->Portal server sends the request to BW Server.
2) There will be two different URLS for the portal in Intranet & Internet
     For that we used two reverse proxy
regards
Indranil

Best practices for JavaFX architecture and patterns?

Hi,
I want to write reusable, easy to maintain JavaFX code for a larger UI project and wonder what are the best practices doing so.
1) Are there preferred UI patterns? MVC, MVP, Presentation Model, ...?
2) Does it make sense to use FXML to separate View from Logic? Or should I use 2-3 Java classes instead (one for View, one for Logic, one for Domain Model, depending on the pattern)
3) How to organize all the views? Should I use Dependency Injection? Or Singletons for each view? Spring or Guice framework, if at all?
Currently I use singletons for most views, so that I can use them from anywhere in my application. If a window is closed and opened again, I use the same instance for that, which still resists in memory.
For patterns, I try to lean on Presentation Model, since this is what I know from Flex development: Having a View layer, which contains all the UI stuff and an abstract view layer, which holds properties, that describe the View, e.g. submitButtonDisabledProperty. The View knows the abstract layer (Presentation Model), but not vice versa and the UI elements are bound to its properties.
I am unsure if this is appropriate for JavaFX, too (for Flex or Silverlight it is).
What are your recommendations / experiences for large UI projects?

You are correct that in 'pure' MVP the View should know as little about it's presenter implementation as possible. The view should just notify one or more 'listeners' that something has happened.
You can use event listeners for this, but I would highly recommend not exposing your Control-specific GUI events and instead create your own. So for example, don't expose ActionEvent or MouseEvent as these expose too much detail about your View's implementation, instead create 'semantic' events, so you might have something like 'sayHelloRequested' or 'printOptionSelected' (whatever naming system you want). This hides how the option is implemented, so you might have a 'print' button, a 'print' menu option, a CTRL+P print shortcut, or a double tap anywhere on your screen to print. The listener knows only that the view thinks 'print was requested by the user' - decoupling achieved.
Once you start doing this however you end up with an explosion of event listener interfaces. So say a view has 10 callbacks it wants to notify about, then you end up with 10 interfaces, and if you're being really pure you also end up with 10 'Event' beans (or DTOs) to encapsulate the details of that event. It starts to get ungainly even for a semi-purist like me. So the logical progression from there is usually just to define all 10 callbacks in one interface and call it something like MyViewListener.
There are two common ways to implement listeners, the traditional way is to allow an arbitrary number of listeners to be added. Whereas another option is to allow only a single listener to be added. In JFX you will notice that Button for example has a setOnAction() method not a addOnAction() method - it allows a single event handler only and let's face it this is generally fine in 95% of cases. For the remaining 5% you can just write your own aggregate event handler that dispatches the event to multiple listeners.
So if we go down the road of single event listeners, using an interface for all of the callbacks and not bothering with full 'Event' objects, you end up with something like this:
public interface MyViewListener {
    void printRequested();
    void doSomething(int someParam);
    void doSomethingElse(String someOtherParam);
}And if you look closely at the 'Purist' option in my MVP pattern where I define interfaces for everything, then you will see that this is pretty much the exact interface I've created for the 'Presenter'. You could just as easily rename this interface to MyViewListener in this pattern and have the same outcome.
So to wrap all that up, yes, the Presenter should be decoupled and I highly favour the 'purist' option in my blog and would definitely use it if FXML didn't dictate a impure design pattern (there are some ongoing discussions about this on the OpenJFX discussion group). And, yes, my 'purist' option could be even more pure if you went for the full-blown event callback model and if you go down that road you will have an extremely clean architecture but also an extremely large code-base - totally your call whether it's worth it.
It's also worth remembering in all this, that there are a lot of people from a lot of different backgrounds using JFX and some people hate (passionately) even my semi-pure option - especially those coming from other, less heavy-weight languages. They just don't get why you wouldn't build it all into one class and reduce the overheads. So what you have in my blog is my thoughts on it, other people will most definitely differ. I'm a big fan of developer's choice, and that's why I did the smorgasboard approach even though I personally would never use some of those implementations.
Also this video on GWT is an awesome reference on GUI design patterns: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM
JFX Flow draws a lot from GWT as I think it is a very clean architecture (just such a shame that they put all that effort into hiding the horrid, sordid mess that is the web+html+css, instead of making something proper, like JFX).
Hope that helps,
zonski

Logical architecture+best practice

Hi,
what does these mean for you regading Oracle applications :
1-logical architecture
2-best practice
Regards.

1-logical architecture -> I assume the technical architecture for deployment of Oracle Applications (Single node, multi node, HA, DMZ configuration etc)
2-best practice -> Best Practices in each function within maintaining and implementing Oracle Applications.. like best practice for Upgrades, Coning Patching etc
Sam
http://www.appsdbablog.com

Best Practices & Strategy Planning for SAP BI Architecture

What are best practices and strategy planning that SAP BI Architect should know?
What are the challenges are involved with this role ?
What are the other information that this Architect should know to deliver the robust BI solution?
Is there any white papers on the best practices on Architecture & Data Modeling, please ?
Thanks,
Venkat.

Hi
As per the Best Practice first load the master and next transaction data .
Please find the link for best practices
http://www.sap.com/services/pdf/BWP_SAP_Best_Practices_for_Business_Intelligence.pdf.
Regarding the architecture it depend upon the size of volumen and how much frequency your load and hard ware sizing
based on this we can provide best solution
If you any issues please let me know
Regards
Madan

Hyperion Essbase Best Practices Document...

Hi All,
Is there any document out there that has the best practices for Hyperion Essbase development? I am looking for methodologies, naming conventions and such information. Wondering if there is any such doc with Hyperion Essbase Guru's that outlines the best approaches for Essbase-outline development with it . Searching this forum with the string "best practice" yields a lot of threads on specific issues, but couldn't find any document.
Any pointer is most appreciated.
Regards,
Upendra.

Various consulting organizations have different
guidelines, each with their own strengths and
weaknesses. To get them to cough it up without
bringing them in for a paid project might be
difficult, but not impossible.I agree with Doug here.. Many of these consulting companies have developed their best practices over a number of years and view them as a competitive advantage over the other consulting firms. I would be highly surprised if you managed to get ahold of such a document very easily.
That being said, those same consultants share information here in bits and pieces, so you can learn at least some of the best practices here (along with best practice tips from consultants/developers/customers who don't have an 'official' best practices guide)..
Tim Tow
Applied OLAP, Inc

High demand architecture, large reports, distributed printing, best practic

Hi,
I have a client with high demand for printing reports in different country regions and large reports (10000 pages some of them), today they are doing this with Oracle Reports, but the server regularly gets overloaded and some reports never complete. They use reports in PDF format.
Can you please suggest an appropriate architecture for this scenario. Or refer some documentation on Best Practices for high demand and distributed reporting?.
Case description
They have a centralized Reports Server and reports are used in different remote regions of the country.
Some reportrs have 6 pages and others may be more than 10.000 pages.
Reports server has communication with some remote facilities at 10 mbps, and some regional offices at 10mbps, but most offices connect at 512 o 1024 bps.
The idea would be having reports like "client reports" in the offices and request only "Data" to the server, so they can reduce network traffic, they believe most problems come from the fact that Reports Server sends heavy PDF thru the network causing lags and fails, some reports never complete, they have to resend them.
Some othes ideas also include : Reduce the business logic placed into reports, use of regional servers, or even they have thought in changing Reports for another tool.
Any comment or suggestion would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your attention.

i think better way is to keep business logic into database and generate ur reports using Forms(Oracle forms) based parameter forms and save results into temporary tables
show some progress bar status on ur forms so it will be easy for users how long they have to wait for report to generate
in reports there should not by anything more than select * from mytemptables
Baig,
[My Oracle Blog|http://baigsorcl.blogspot.com/]

Architecture/Design Question with best practices ?

Architecture/Design Question with best practices ?
Should I have separate webserver, weblogic for application and for IAM ?
If yes than how this both will communicate, for example should I have webgate at both the server which will communicate each other?
Any reference which help in deciding how to design and if I have separate weblogic one for application and one for IAM than how session management will occur etc
How is general design happens in IAM Project ?
Help Appreciated.

The standard answer: it depends!
From a technical point of view, it sounds better to use the same "midleware infrastructure", BUT then the challenge is to find the lastest weblogic version that is certified by both the IAM applications and the enterprise applications. This will pull down the version of weblogic, since the IAM application stack is certified with older version of weblogic.
From a security point of view (access, availability): do you have the same security policy for the enterprise applications and the IAM applications (component of your security architecture)?
From a organisation point of view: who is the owner of weblogic, enterprise applications and IAM applications. In one of my customer, application and infrastructure/security are in to different departments. Having a common weblogic domain didn't feet in the organization.
My short answer would be: keep it separated, this will save you a lot of technical and political challenges.
Didier.

Bring CRM to clients and partners, Architecture DMZ best practices

Hi, we need to bring access to CRM from internet to clients and partners.
So that we need to know the best practices to architecture design.
We have many doubts with these aspects:
- We will use SAP portal, SAP Gateways and web dispatchers with a DMZ:
       do you have examples about this kind of architecture?
- The new users will be added in 3 steps: 1000, 10000 and 50000:
       how can regulate the stress at internal system?, is it possible?
- The system can't show any problems to the clients:
       we need 24x7 system, because the clients are big clients.
- At the moment we have 1000 internal users.
thanks

I use the Panel Close? filter event and discard it and use the event to signal to my other loops/modules that my software should shut down. I normally do this either via user events or if I'm using a queued state machine (which I generally do for each of my modules) then I enqueue a 'shutdown' message where each VI will close its references (e.g. hardware/file) and stop the loop.
If it's just a simple VI, I can sometimes be lazy and use local variables to tell a simple loop to exit.
Finally, once all of the modules have finished, use the FP.Close method to close the top level VI and the application should leave memory (once everything else has finished running).
This *seems* to be the most recommended way of doing things but I'm sure others will pipe up with other suggestions!
The main thing is discarding the panel close event and using it to signal the rest of your application to shut down. You can leave your global for 'stopping' the other loops - just write a True to that inside the Panel Close? event but a better method is to use some sort of communications method (queue/event) to tell the rest of your application to shut down.
Certified LabVIEW Architect, Certified TestStand Developer
NI Days (and A&DF): 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014
NI Week: 2012, 2014
Knowledgeable in all things Giant Tetris and WebSockets

Hyperion - best practice architecture

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for