I cant see my virtual copies on Lightroom

I try to create virtual copies in LR, but they are NOT visible, all filter and flags are off. Any help?

"Not visible,..."   Where may I ask?  Lightroom Library? Windows/Mac File Explorer?
Virtual copies are only ever visible within Lightroom.
Pressing [S] will toggle "stack"s on/off for all VCs of the one master image thumbnail. Try pressing [S]
"all filter and flags are off.."  does that include the "Kind" icons at the end of the 'Attributes' filter tool bar?

Similar Messages

  • Can you retrieve deleted virtual copies from Lightroom?

    Hello,
    I removed a catalog from LR3 and re-imported it and my develop settings are intact however, my virtual copies are all missing. Is there a way to get those copies re-imported back into LR or could they be in a cache file somewhere on my computer?
    Help!!!
    AlikMc

    That depends on your OS and/or if you did change the defaults.
    Look here: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/843/cpsid_84313.html

  • How to unstack (if this is the right term) virtual copies in LR4?

    i looked at this article http://forums.adobe.com/message/2881825#2881825 but it did not help. click on the 1/2 icon only makes it become "2" and doesnt sit the virtual copy next to each other.
    is "stacking" the right term im using or is there something im overlooking. last week lightroom was fine, this week its acting up without me touching anything.
    basically i would like to see my virtual copies side by side. thanks!

    Aloha Y'all,
    Don't know if you figrued this out, but I had a friend with the same issue and you inspired me to explore it a little more... The easy fix we found was being in the Library Module and in the Grid View... Then click "None" in the Library Filter bar at the top... It seems that somehow in the "attribute" area of the Library Filter bar at the far right we somehow had clicked on the first little icon to the right of the word "kind" that is to only view the "Master files"... We Tried it again to double-check and yep... With that icon clicked you cannot stack and unstack virtual copies... because you have told Lightroom to only show the Master Files... Duh. :-/
    Thanks for giving me the oompf to figure that out... Hope is helps, if any of you didn't know that.
    Message was edited by: SantaFeRick

  • Virtual Copies Not Working for Me

    Hello,
    I've installed Lightroom 1.0 and so far love it. But, I do have one issue. I cannot seem to create Virtual Copies.
    I select a photo in the Library grid, right-click it (I'm running Windows XP) and select "Create Virtual Copy."
    The grid's view remains the same (no new 'copy' of the picture with the little earmark appears) and on the Film Strip, I see a new gray box at the end of the strip, but no picture is in the gray box. If I click the gray box, nothing happens.
    If I try to create another virtual copy (of same photo or a different photo) the same behavior happens again (no change to the grid, and yet another gray empty placeholder where a new photo should appear).
    Am I creating virtual copies incorrectly? Is anyone else having this issue? I see nothing in knowledge base or Support DB about this.
    Thanks,
    Rodney

    Hi!
    Hmm, I played around a bit; this bug seems to have something to do with the Collection depth or wheter they were created with beta 4.1 or anything?!
    My steps:
    - I built a collection "Jockulator" in beta 4.1, created around 10 child collections with depth three.
    - With LR 1.0 I created "Jockulator / Zoo / H". When adding photos to this Collection, I do not see the virtual copies, like said above.
    - When I click "Jockulator / Zoo", same problem
    - When I click "Jockulator" (with 102 photos), I DO SEE the virtual copies!!
    - I have created then another collection with the same child depth, I have added photos and virtual copies to all dephts, aaaaand: it works.... in tears of joy or so I tried more ;-)
    - Some of the names of the "Jockulator" child collections had chars like " " and ":" in it which I remember to be difficult to handle sometimes. I tried renaming them, but the bug stays present.
    - Then I made a new child "Jockulator / 1-Zoo" (which is the first child alphabetically) and a child "H-85mm", and there....... it works!!!!
    So I don't know what the real bug is, but at least I know that it is not a immanent bug on my system, but that I can workaround it ... somehow...
    Bye . . . Joerg Wirtgen

  • Virtual copies are not synchronized in a second Lightroom catalogue although metadata are written in XMP and synchronization with metadata was selected

    Dear community,
    I operate one Mac with Lightroom 5.7 that is configured to store all metadata in xmp files. The Lightroom catalogue is stored locally on the Mac and only contains references to the images and their xmp files that are stored on a network device. There is another Mac with the same configuration having a separate local Lightroom catalogue and access to the same images on the network device.
    At a starting point, both Lightroom catalogues are identical - they refer to the same images on the network device and contain the same metadata.
    When I update image properties on the first Mac, these changes are reflected in the xmp file. After using the option "synchronize" with activated "metadata synchronization" on the second Mac, the modified image properties are visible on the second Mac. This is fine.
    However, when I create a virtual copy on the first Mac, I realize that the corresponding xmp file gets updated. However, even after synchronization, the virtual copy is not visible on the second Mac. I may modify image properties of the original image and get these modifications replicated to the second Mac, but the virtual copies remain on the first Mac.
    What needs to be done that also virtual copies get synchronized?
    Thank you very mich for your support.
    Best regards,
    Peter

    I do not doubt that File Export / File Import will work to transfer the virtual copies.
    My question was related to the fact whether the imported folder should not previously exist on the second Mac.
    Consider the following situation:
    time = 0:
    first Mac: folder A is in a first status
    second Mac: folder A is in a first status
    time = 1:
    first Mac: folder A is in a second status, export folder A in second status
    second Mac: folder A is in a first status, import folder A in second status
    My question is: What happens with these two folder A on the second Mac? Does folder A in the Lightroom catalogue of the second Mac gets overwritten? Do I receive an error message because folder A is already present in the Lightroom catalogue?
    I understand your answer that everything will be fine on the second Mac if there is no folder A at all at the second Mac while I import the new folder A. Under this assumption, I can import folder A and it will show the second status. Clearly.
    My question is only related to the fact that there is already a folder A on the second Mac, with the same images, but with different metadata and/or virtual copies.

  • Lightroom 5 virtual copies disappear

    HI there, just recently, maybe in the past couple months, anytime I make multiple virtual copies of images and then close and reopen lightroom, the copies have disappeared. I have a Mac with OSX 10.7.5. Thanks for any help.

    How that happened I cannot answer!
    To achieve the same I would- Select all images, press CTRL+'  (the key with quote symbols) three times.
    To view only the VCs (to delete?) you can filter for 'Attributes' and there is a toggle icon to show only VCs to the right of flags, stars, colors, etc.
    You will need a smart collection to filter for VCs that have NOT been edited.

  • Lightroom Virtual Copies when creating publish gallery

    When I create a publish gallery, I have the option of creating virtual copies. However, I notice the virtual copy stays with the original image, along with showing in the publish gallery. I would have figured the copy would only show in the publish gallery. Since I can't immediately tell where the vitual copy is linked to, it makes it confusing sometimes if I go back to re-edit. I want to isolate the photo from the orignal copy so lightroom doesn't want to republish any future edits to that file. Using lightroom 3.6. I've searched on this behavior and haven't found any helpful information.
    Any suggestions on how to more effectively use this in my workflow?

    With "publish gallery" you mean a collection under a Publish Service?
    I have not checked with LR4.2 how this behaves, but with normal collections you should get only the virtual copies as members.
    But you can remove the masters from the collection, using the filter: when in the collection, choose only master files in the filter bar, no virtual copies nor videos. Then select them all and choose simple delete: this will not remove from catalog ( as a splash-delete would do), but simply revoke their collection membership. Unlock the filter and you should have only the virtual copies left in your collection.
    Cornelia

  • HT4859 I HAVE AN ONLINE i CLOUD ACCOUNT. WHEN I SIGN IN TO IT ON MY PC I SEE NO PHOTS OR MUSIC STORED THERE. i CAN SEE NOTES ADDED THERE. i AM TOLD i HAVE LOTS ODF DATA STORED AND IT WOULD BE WISE TO INCREASE THE STORAGE CAPACITY BUT CANT SEE VIRTUALLY AN

    i HAVE AN ONLINE i CLOUD ACCOUNT. WHEN i SIGN IN TO IT ON MY PC i CAN SEE CHANGES I MAKE UNDER NOTES BUT THERE IS NO SIGN OF ANY OF THE  PHOTOS OR MUSIC THERE WHICH ARE IN MY I PAD. i HAVE PAID TO ENLARGE THE DATA CAPACITY SAVED THERE ONE STEP ABOVE THE BASIC LEVEL. iTS NOW A YEAR ON AND BECAUSE i CANT SEE ANYTHING THERE ON i CLOUD OTHER THAN A FEW SIMPLE NOTES i DECIDED TO REDUCE THE CAPACITY TO THE BASIC LEVEL AGAIN. APPLE NOW HAVE SENT ME AN E MAIL SAYING  IF I DO THAT I WILL LOSE DATA AS I HAVE MORE STORED THERE THAN THE BASIC AMOUNT.CAPACITY. wHY THEN CANT i SEE THIS DATA?

    "I still dont understand why I dont see any of these camera roll photos (or any) when I sign in on line on my pc to my icloud account.
    If photos cant be seen there, how do you arrange for an accidently deleted photo to be restored from there into the iPad?"
    If you set up photostream correctly on your computer/ipad and instructions can be found here:
    http://www.apple.com/icloud/setup/
    it automatically created photostream folder in your Pictures/my pictures folder for Windows or iphoto for Mac.
    You will find all your pictures in there, no need to go online. If you didn't use Photostream -start doing so now.
    Otherwise you pictures are included in your back up, but that is an image file. What it means you will not be able to retreive one picture out of back up. You can however restore from that back up - instructions here
    iOS: How to back up - Apple - Support
    You probably do not want to do that for one picture, or even two but the option exists and steps are also in the article above.
    "You say music does not take up i Cloud space . Does that mean it is not saved there in any way?"
    What I meant that whatever is saved - does not go against 5 gigs of storage that apple gives you - unlimited space available, but only for the stuff you purchased in itunes.
    "If it is saved but cant be seen, how do I set about restoring a music track that was deleted accidentily in the i Pad?"
    It can be seen and instructions here:
    Downloading past purchases from the App Store ... - Apple - Support

  • Lightroom virtual copies question

    One of the advantages of virtual copies is thet you can have several copies, each with different processing for later comparison. Is there a consensus as to where you can keep notes unique to each virtual copy of the processing used.? The ol' mind sometimes leaks too much to remember what I did to each virtual copy and the history list is sometimes too cryptic to help.

    Notes is something I really need.  If LR created a place for us to store such notes, it would not be in the metadata and would not follow the image out of LR.  Maybe that's OK.    However, it isn't an issue because they don't provide anywhere for notes.
    Since I really needed to know what I do with various photos outside of LR (usually PS), I started using the metadata field Special Instructions (called Instructions in LR)  for putting in notes.  These fields are all pretty imited in length. Special Instructions is one of the longer one at 256 characters.  So I don't give details, just the general direction of what I did.
    Note, if you do this, it just might show up in displayed metadata information.  For example, flickr displays this field.  I figure people don't need to know EVERYTHING, so I strip out this field before I upload.  I was doing other metadata munging anyway to merge my location fields into description, so it wasn't a big deal for me.
    Judy

  • Location of virtual copies on a Mac

    I made virtual copies for some of my pictures in order to do different crops.
    While I can see the results in Lightroom, I am unable to see the file (or the .xmp if that's the result).
    They seem not to be located in the same folder. but where???
    Any idea?

    There are loads, see here, but they usually only read bits from the xmp data. AFAIK only LR and Bridge will read everything that LR stores in xmp, but there may be others. As it is an open format I would expect to see greater usage of it being made, as tends to happen with most Adobe developed formats, unless somebody writes a better open format, in which case Adobe adopts it and abounded its original (as has happened with PSD). In the meantime it is the only way to transfer processing data around in image files without making permanent changes to a file, so we have to live with it!

  • Virtual copies not visible

    Oh God, can some one PLEASE help me???I can't contact Adobe by phone,m too late and it says everyone else busy, try later...right. 
    I DID review as much as I could possibly read, and NOTHING is of help.
    1. Made virtual copies, count goes up, can't see them in grid in library, develop, or in loupe.  Thought they were stacked, but when I went to Photo>stacking> the rest is all grayed out...can't do anything.  "set as master copy" also grayed out,.  Read somewhere "preferences for lightroom might be corrupt"????   I tried to do the thing in the library to correct the preferences,:(on moubntain lion 10.8.3), but in the user file there is no library...so I then looked up how to find the hidden library, but I can't  find the stuff to do THAT!!!  And, there IS a library on my hard drive, but when I open THAT up, there isn't anything about preferences.
    I JUST bought this 2 mos ago--how can it have corrupt preferences when I only just started using it???--used it once, then discovered diddn't have right processor in old computer...bought a new computer...took several weeks to get (bought increased ram)...now I am just using for first time today.  Started importing, but they are all coming up missing photoi (when I had lightroomn installed on old computer, I deleted uit and pics), then reinstalled and it was migrated over to this new computer.  I looked up how to massive transfer missing photos and there is NO folder with a question mark, so I have to do hundreds and hundreds manually--can I tell you I am really hating LR4.4????? Right now I am hating photography and LR and I am beyond upset.  I got back from vacation a month ago, and STILL haven't been able to process my pics!!!
    Disgruntled King Tut's Mom---p.s.PLEEZ help be4 I have a nervous breakdown !!!

    thanks...very strange.  so first, I found a thread that said could have corrupt preferences...the short of it:  caslled Apple support--he showed me how topull out the hidden "library (it wasn't that easy as it was written on a webpage here).  I found LR preferences and they were corrupt--there was almost nothing in them.  Followed instructions on webpage here, and redid them and it looked QUITE different!
    Thwn by accident I discovered that if I click on ALL photographs, the virtual copies were there, but not in the 2013 folder specifically.  don't understand that.  I later closed out and restarted, and now they are everywhere they are supposed to be, so I think it was the corrupt prefderences.  Also, now the mouse is working on the actual photo again......VERY odd.
    However, I am afraid to download anymore pictures because of what has been happening...the question mark, then another box telling me the metadata has been changed by both LR and another application, and do I want LR to import settings from disk or overwrite disk setrtings with those from the catalog?  I have no idea what this means...what does it mean, disk?. or from catalog?  Does it mean there were these pics still somewhere else on my computer and LR is confused?  I sure am.  The drink sounds very good......
    CAN ANYONE HELP??
    King Tut's mom

  • Inconsistent order in grid when creating Virtual Copies.

    When I create a virtual copy of a photo and look at it with the stack expanded, the order that the two pics appear in the library grid is inconsistent. Sometimes the VC is listed AFTER the original in the grid, and sometimes it's listed BEFORE the original. When it's listed before the original, I've tried changing the stack "on top" setting, but this only changes which photo appears when the stack is collapsed -- the order when expanded stays the same.
    I feel like I might be missing something here, i.e. is there some method of making a VC appear after vs before the original in the library grid? Also, is there a way to swap the order so that I can "fix" the situation? So far, the only fix I've found is to delete the VC and re-create it, at which point the order is sometimes corrected.
    Thanks for any feedback on this,
    Larry

    b_gossweiler wrote:
    it might be that you have a filter in effect on "All Photographs" that prevents the VCs from being shown
    Here's why I don't think that's my problem. I search and find an image - so yes I am using a filter - lets say I want file ABC123. Now I see that frame and I also see a Virtual Copy which I previously created. So clearly I don't have a any filter to prevent my seeing VCs. Now I select the Master and create a new Virtual Copy. The new copy does not appear but the Master reports it is now 1 of 3. So Lightroom is telling me there are three copies of this file, but only displays two, the Master and an older Virtual Copy.
    All I have to do (!) to see the new Virtual Copy is quit and relaunch. Now I see all three copies, the Master, the older and the new VIrtual Copy. Nothing changes between quit and relaunch.
    Even if "All Photographs" isn't a Smart Collection, is appears to have the same issue others have reported on creating Virtual Copies.
    DG

  • Virtual copies are invisible to me in LR 4.3

    When I create virtual copies, the total number of instances of the image goes up but I don't see any of the virtual images. I unstack and it shows they're unstacked and "1 of 2" but I still can't see the other. I've turned off all filters and still nothing.
    It was happening in 4.3rc and is still happening in 4.3. It is only present in certain catalogs.

    jasonjmp2 wrote:
    I would have thought that when you are in the Libary in a collection and you make a virtual copy, LR would automatically add the copy to the collection that contains it's Master.
    Yes, that is the expected procedure. The VC should be added to the collection automatically if it is created while working in the collection. And I never had a problem with this.
    For all of you who have problems with VCs not showing where they are expected:
    This could be due to a corrupt Preference File. This file can go "funny" and is then responsible for all kinds of strange behavior of Lr. The remedy is replacing the Preference File.
    See here for where to find the Preference file for your OS: http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/preference-file-locations-lightroo m-4.html
    See here for how to go about Replacing the Preference File: http://lightroomers.com/replacing-the-lightroom-preference-file/745/

  • Published virtual copies show up in Grid View of Collection

    I'm a bit frustrated at something that has only recently begun happening to me.  I am using Lightroom 3.  I'll have a collection that I will publish to flickr.  when I do, I later look at the collection and it'll not only show my photos, but also a virtual copy that is published to flickr.  I don't want that.  It's not necessary to see and I didn't have to see them before.  If I want to see what is published, I can go to the published collection and look.  On my local collection, I don't want to see virtual copies unless they were virtual copies that I purposely made for some reason.  I don't want Lighroom to be automatically creating a duplicate of every image that I publish to flickr.

    The screenshot was very helpful.  The problem is with the Custom 05 custom metadata field.  Which plugin defined that?
    It appears that smart collections don't properly search the custom metadata fields of virtual copies.    I filed a bug report in the official Adobe feedback forum: Lightroom: Smart collections don't correctly search custom metadata fields.
    You could work around this by using a filter preset in the Library Filter bar.  Perhaps not as convenient, but it would get the job done.

  • Finding Virtual Copies in Smart Collections

    Is there any way to find virtual copies in smart collections without using "copy name is not empty" ? Basically I am trying to use copy name as a version number for all images, include the base image which is the original. But this then makes it difficult to find the actual copies themselves. Any ideas?
    Thanks

    Is Andy? wrote:
    I'll see whether a smart collection can work from a saved filter, which can identify the real VCs correctly.
    Not sure what this means, but if you want "Is Virtual Copy" metadata available for (standard Lr native) smart collections, it is available via
    Metadata Extensions
    The only caveat is that the metadata is not updated immediately, so you need to "manage" the metadata updating and/or your expectations.
    Funny - I just ran into the need for this last night - I solved by making sure all virtual copy names were distinguishable from master copy names, still: because of Lightroom's text metadata processing shortcomings (e.g. space handling and "Big Mallard Ducks" bug), It really is best to have a yes/no rule.
    Cheers,
    Rob

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I get an iphone to replace my mom's old phone without activating it until she opens it?

    The guy at the store was a real jerk.  He said I could not get the new phone and delay the switch or activate it myself, that once I got her the new phone I could not leave the store without activating it and turning off her existing phone!  He was v

  • Help plzz abt xml

    public static int replaceTag(String targetTagName, String newTagName, String xmlDoc) public static int replaceTag(String targetTagName, String newTagName,Document xmlDoc) The above two methods replace the element name of every targetTagName element w

  • Unable to print PDF file

    Hi All, I have a printer HP ML1005 installed on my Mac. Printing is fine for all office applications and other applications as well *EXCEPT for PDF file*. Before I can print a PDF file on this printer, but now for no reason I can't print - it stuck o

  • Deserialization failed: Value was either too large or too small for an Int32.

    hi all I'm getting below error when I click on Properties of Datasource in Sql server analysis server; kindly help me.

  • Forwarding agent should not hold empty value

    Hi all, In Vt02n transaction while doing shipment completion i need to check if the forwarding agent field is empty or not . If it is so i need to raise a error message. After that the forwarding agent field should be opened for input. In the include