I'd like to see a floating license option for XML Author.

I am an experienced structured FM user. I am trying to set up a structured authoring environment for a small engineering firm. I write and edit documentation for aviation engineering projects. I work with six to eight engineers and designers who contribute content to our technical publications.
I want to minimize authoring overhead by eliminating manual formatting from my contributor workflow. Ideally, I would manage EDDs, DTDs, templates etc. and deploy several XML author licenses to collect content. However, the cost of an XML author license per each potential contributor is prohibitive for my small firm. I would love to be able to deploy XML Author through Creative Cloud either as a single-app license or as part of a team license.
Several other authoring platforms including Flare (no structured support, I know) offer a floating license option. I think a floating license option would make the Structured Frame/XML Author combo more competitive for Adobe and more attractive to small firms like mine.

Tell someone who make iphone apps.

Similar Messages

I have AI CS6 but do not see the option to Package a file. I do not see under File the option for Package

I have AI CS6 but do not see the option to Package a file. I do not see under File the option for Package

Thank you for the response. The AI Help did not indicate it was a Cloud
only feature but that makes sense.
Thanks again
Art Needleman
Division of Visitor Services
National Wildlife Refuge System
500 Gold Avenue, SW / Room 4501
Albuquerque, NM 87102
505-248-6822
The question is not what is the sound of one hand clapping but who is
making that sound. -- C.A.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Larry G. Schneider <

Licensing Options for .air (& .pdf) files?

Hello,
Does anyone have any ideas for licensing software for .air files that will be distributed? Using .swf licensing option might also work. Most everything out there is for .exe, and is really expensive.
I'm also looking for licensing options for use in PDFs that will be distributed.
Thanks!

Hi,
I'd start here:
http://www.adobe.com/licensing/
(runtimes licensing and distributions)
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/antipiracy/faq.html
(Acrobat family licensing/distributions FAQ)
PDF is advertised as open format:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pdf.html
(PDF Technology Center)
and other forum could help:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/acrobat
Generally speaking reading EULA-s for software you're using to produce contain help to find what software is used/components licensed for use with runtime/etc (so we could avoid patent trolls - while Adobe could be hit only - in theory):
http://www.adobe.com/products/eulas/
hth,
regards,
Peter

I would like to see my daily data usage for January 2015

How can I see my daily data usage for the month before the current one?

Sign into My Verizon. View bill. Change to date period desired. Click DATA tab. Under the Data Type drop-down select Data Usage. You can see day by day and approx what time and how much data was used. You can change the data from KB, MB, and GB. Probably easier to use MB to add it up. You can also use an app in the Play Store, if using an Android that can monitor your use and let you know daily, weekly, monthly use and what apps used that data. I'm sure Apple has something similar if you use an iPhone.

I don't see the backup files option for my library

I am currently using iTunes release 10.5.1.42 and I no longer see the option for backing up my files to CD. It used to be under File>Library but again, the option is missing. Can someone please advise me on a fix/work around for this issue? I have no interest in backing up my files to the cloud.

in the newer versions of iTunes "back up to disc" is no longer an option
you can try this article if you have an external hard drive
do steps 1 and 2
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1751?viewlocale=en_US

I would like to see even more import options

Say you have 3 different shoots you're importing at once, and they are all shot on different days. As it stands now you can put them in different folders or in the same one if you like, and even rename the folders.
What if you can rename the not only the folders but the photo names as well as you import them based on the folder that they are in.
Like a check mark that says name files the same as the folder.

That's a nice addon cor-el, thank you. It does not solve my issue but it's a step in the right direction! I love that finally somebody thought at making that window resizable!

I would like to have the new license file for version 2010

Can you deliver me the new license file, compatible with Labview 2010 ? We receive an error, as shown in attachment
Attachments:
01-12-2010_155054.jpg ‏84 KB

A simple license does not include upgrade to newer versions. If you want to keep up to date at all times, look into a SSP subscription. It has many other benefits.
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

I do not like to see that mozilla offers firefox for MAC and also CAMINO browsers.

I like Mozilla.
BUT I do NOT like to be offered two browsers for my macbook.
WHY am I offered CAMINO and FIREFOX? Does not make sense.
Because CAMINO is more adhered to the MAC environ, I suggest you eliminate the other and just rename CAMINO as the version of FIREFOX for Macs! Simple, more economic for you.
Because now if I pick CAMINO I am picking a not very well known browser, and some webpages even do not recognize it (like the www.uned.es)

You can provide '''feedback''' to Mozilla here: <br />
http://hendrix.mozilla.org/
I'm sure the users and developers of the Camino project would disagree with your opinion. And if other people thought like that back in 2002, Firefox might not exist today.

Would like to see on line the options (cost) for local service only

I saw a page the other day, and there was a local plan for $18.17
Now I can't find it back, no matter how much searching I do. I an area code 812-prefix 794.
Now the cheapest I can find is the Verizon Unlimited Local Service....at this link.
http://www22.verizon.com/Residential/Templates/Products/ProductDisplay.aspx
Can anyone help please?
Tia.
Sue
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I ended up calling them, and found out there is an even cheaper local land line service than what I had seen and then discussed with a rep days ago. It is just $14.17 and an additional $3.50 for call waiting, and then the usual taxes and additional charges. I have unlimited calling to 3 local towns, and have signed up for a Long Distance plan with another company that is 4.5 cents a minute, and even breaks the minute down into increments.
I'm a Verizon/Gte retiree, and will now be able to get the retiree concession rate since I no longer have one of the packages. They are practically 'giving' me my service.
Sue...a happy camper!

Licensing options for Adobe Creative Suite Software - Concurrent license

We have bought Adobe Web Premium CS4 product and at the moment it’s our intention to upgrade this product to the new release.
This product is licensed to one PC and it’s used, mostly, to repair acrobat documents and sometimes a few pictures which mean it’s not used intensively.
As we have another service that needs to use adobe Dreamweaver, Flash and Photoshop we would like to know if there is any kind of license that can be installed in one server and be used by other PCs, as long as the license is available and not in use by other PC.
We have other products with this kind of functionality, like AutoCAD, ArcGIS.
Does Adobe have any kind of this licensing method?
With my best regards,
Pedro

At this point you can no longer buy CS5, only CS6.
Mylenium

Cheapest Volume Licensing option for 8.1

Unreal the ridiculousness that is the Microsoft Licensing program...
I am wanting to figure out the cheapest method to get a 5 PC volume license. I already have 5 PCs with 8.1 Retail Pro loaded on them. I basically just want imaging rights at this point and to be able to add to the volume later as my businesss grows.
I'm confused as I keep seeing 2 and 3 year term agreements. Can I not simply pay one price at one time to get a volume license? I'm not interested in paying Microsoft annually for software. I'll abandon my endeavor if that's the case as it isn't worth it to me to be locked into an annual contract/subscription.
What exactly do I need to ask a reseller for I guess is the question I'm asking based on my above criteria?
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Make a trigger on insert inserting the date of the insert then query the table...

Licensing options for Server 2012 Standard Edition

I am working a proposal to a new client. Currently they have a single physical server, and 15 workstations, connected to AD;
Server 2012 standard running hyper-V - evaluation (and not attached to the domain)
On it are two virtual machines -
Domain Controller 2008 32bit - license is activated.
2nd server 2008 R2 64bit - evaluation (attached to the domain)
If they purchase a 2012 Server Standard license, with 15 user cals, I should be able to activate the two unlicensed servers?
Mark Smed, NPA Network Support Technician [email protected] Northern Computer l Your trusted partner. Ph: 250.762.7753 Ext. 1803 www.northerncomputer.ca

... If you make the host a domain controller and run Hyper-V you lose your "free" VM instances...
It is my understanding that you lose one of your VM instances, not both. I was led to believe that the purpose of this restriction is to prevent someone from getting a three-for-two deal on licenses, not to lock them out of guest privileges entirely.
but in you instance the host is not licensed and one of the vm's are not licensed so you still need to get a license for the host however you go about it.
This is not quite true as worded. It's true that you have to get a license for the host in general, because Windows Server licenses always apply to a specific piece of hardware, never to a virtual machine. However, it's not necessarily true that you have
to license the management operating system (I think the licensing document calls this the physical OSE, or something like that).
If you have purchased one license of Windows Server Standard 2012 or 2012 R2 non-OEM, then you are licensed to run a maximum of two virtual instances of that same server operating system version/edition or lower on a single host with up to 2 physical CPUs.
You are also allowed to run that same operating system version/edition or lower as the management operating system without purchasing an additional license as long as it runs nothing but Hyper-V Server and services needed manage/maintain its own virtual machines.
If you do anything else in the management OS that provides services to other systems (like ADDS), then one of the guest licensing privileges is lost to cover the management OS. Any OEM licensing may have its own restrictions.
For licensing questions, it is always best to contact an authorized Microsoft reseller and ask to speak to a licensing expert. They go through training specifically for this. The call is usually free. The fines for license violations most
certainly are not. "Read it on a forum" is not good audit defense.
Eric Siron Altaro Hyper-V Blog
I am an independent blog contributor, not an Altaro employee. I am solely responsible for the content of my posts.
"Every relationship you have is in worse shape than you think."

I'd like to see next generation of Touchsmart PC with Touchsmart keyboard and dual screen

Where you have a monitor as the display and a seperate keyboard, but the keyboard is another monitor which operates as a keyboard, for example something like this...
This ultimately would mean that the keyboard could be application driven, that is it could be specifically configured anyway that the application requires it. I'd also like to see a dual screen option for touchsmart PC - a screen that is built in and can be slid out from the rear of the monitor to act as dual screen, extended screen...
HP ENVY 17-j005tx Notebook, HP ENVY Recline 27-k001a, HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 G2020T, HP MediaSmart EX495 Server, HP MediaVault 2020, HP ENVY 120 AiO Printer

Jim,
You may want to check out this community for developers. I'm pretty sure HP is aware of the goings-on in these forums:
http://www.touchsmartcommunity.com/forums
... an HP employee expressing his own opinion.
Please post rather than send me a Message. It's good for the community and I might not be able to get back quickly. - Thank you.

What would you most like to see in a future version?

I'm pretty sure the DSC development team looks at these posts so what would you most like to see in the future? For me, I'd like to be able to dynamically add tags without shutting down the engine.
Regards,
Robert

In "context help". No more "no description available". At least give me the data type.
PaulG.
"I enjoy talking to you. Your mind appeals to me. It resembles my own mind except that you happen to be insane." -- George Orwell

How many other people would like to see a "GarageBand-esque" skin/gui???

how many other people would like to see a "GarageBand-esque" skin/gui for logic express/pro???
i use all three apps a lot, and the main thing i really enjoy about GarageBand is the simple single window interface.
i would like to see apple make the option of having a single window skin for logic.
iMac CoreDuo 2ghz/2GB/500GB Mac OS X (10.4.2)

The good thing about the Logic GUI, how grey and dull it may look, is that you don´t focus on it. It is pleasant to your eyes--and mind.
Garageband is for fun. If Logic should have a lift, I think inspiration should come from Final Cut. An app that initially was developed maybe 10 years later than Logic.
Problem with Logic is that it has been on the run for such a long time.
Quite a few menus haven´t changed in almost 15 years, well 10, then.
(Look at the much loved/hated environment)
Can´t help compare to SX, that had a completely new GUI, with the switch from Vst to SX. At a glance it is much more elegant than Logic.-And many features are superior to Logic--But, as your arrangement in SX grows, your screen will be cluttered--In a mess...all the bells and whistles.
And Logic remains cleaner in it´s dullness.
But, I´m very much annoyed with the GUI of a few Logic instruments.
The worst is Sculpture. Well, the GUI may be fancy enough, but do you have to use a magnifying glass to watch? It is just as bad as Reason!
I remember doing a post about upgrading graphic cards (I have 64 mb) and was adviced: No use, you will not benefit from upgrading, if you primarly use Logic....So Logic has a poor resolution or what? I don´t know, Tell me.
JanD

I'd like to see a floating license option for XML Author.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for