I defined my PI/XI system in R/3 system SM59

I defined my PI/XI system in R/3 system SM59 inside below
Rfc Destinations
HTTP Connections to R/3 System
 PI/XI definition
Test connection fails to XI system. I checked username,password, ip address
all is correct.I'm using PIAPPLUSER . This user was defined at the both end (R/3 and XI).
What can I do for achieving R/3 - XI connection.Vice versa is properly running.

PIAPPLUSER
role:SAP_XI_APPL_SERV_USER
profile:SAP_ALL
T_YB250030
When I use PIAPPLUSER connection is fail.
If I use most autorized user connection is successfull.
In addition which role or profile must be added to PIAPPLUSER
thanks

Similar Messages

Define Service Desk Destination in the Solution Manager System (Dump creen)

hi,
in SPRO when i click on Define Service Desk Destination in the Solution Manager System
i got dump screen with the error below
any help?
Runtime Errors         SAPSQL_EMPTY_TABNAME
Except.                CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SYNTAX
Date and Time          13.07.2008 14:05:57
Short text
    A dynamically specified FROM clause has an unexpected format.
What happened?
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPLSHI2" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYNAMIC_OSQL_SYNTAX', was not
     caught in
    procedure "STREE_READ_NODE_GENER" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by a
     RAISING clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    The running ABAP program attempted to execute an Open SQL statement in
    which a FROM clause was specified dynamically in the field "TABLE_NAME". In
     this
    FROM clause, either a table name after a join operator is missing, or an
     alias name after the key name "AS". The field "TABLE_NAME" could be empty as
    well.
regards

Hi,
I am facing the same problem. What is SP15 ?
Is there any SAP Note that can be applied to correct this ?
Thanks.

Defining a BI content datasoure in the source system(R/3)

Hi
How to define a BI content datasoure in the source system(R/3)? Can anyone help me out in this regard?
Regards,
Suman.

Hi,
In R3 system Activate data source in RSA5. Then you will be able to see datasource in RSA6. Enhance datasource if needed. Go to BI system and Replicate datasource.
You will find lot of threads on how to activate datasource(s).
Also check the below link:
Need some documents on SAP -BI extraction
Regards,
Pruthvi R
Edited by: Pruthvi R on Oct 22, 2009 10:40 AM

Problem in creation of system alias for bw system

Hi,
I want to create system alias for the bw system
system admin->sys Config->system landscape->portal content->my own folder
for this folder i created the system object
after creation of system object, from property category i select the connector and give the details.
after that i select the user management and give
authentication ticket - select
Logon method- UIDPW
User Management type- admin,user
i saved till now
in the display object i select the system alias
then that screen displays
In the system alias screen, i clicked on add button for adding alias then we r getting this message.
User Mapping Status: (Not ready for user mapping configuration)
Please give the solution for solving this problem
Regards,
Sid.
Edited by: sid m on Mar 11, 2008 12:15 PM

Hi Krishna,
I checked the connection settings.
WAS settings in system object is giving this mistake
before user mapping it works fine.
after giving usermapping i ma getting this exception.
SAP Web AS Connection
Test Details:
The test consists of the following steps:
1. Check the validity of the system ID in the system object
2. Check whether the system can be retrieved
3. Check whether a SAP system is defined in the system object
4. Validate the following parameters: WAS protocol; WAS host name
5. Check HTTP/S connectivity to the defined backend application
Results
1. The system ID is valid
2. Retrieval of the system was successful
3. The system object represents an SAP system
4. The following parameters are valid: Web AS Protocol (http) Web AS Host Name (172.19.18.75)
5. HTTP/S connection failed
for testing the connector i am getting this exception
Test Connection with Connector
Test Details:
The test consists of the following steps:
1. Retrieve the default alias of the system
2. Check the connection to the backend application using the connector defined in this system object
Results
Retrieval of default alias successful
Connection failed. Make sure user mapping is set correctly and all connection properties are correct.
Regards,
Sid.

AC 5.3 Logical systems and multiple Physical systems

HI all:
We have set up a Logical System, and then have hooked up 2 Physical systems to it. Based on the documentation from SAP, the rule set (and the way we set it up) is at the Logical system level.
Physical system #1 is reporting the correct results, however, Physical system #2 results are not complete. My understanding is that both Physical systems should be drawing from the rule set based in the Logical system.
Results: Physical system #1 - correctly identifies 10 risks
Physical system #2 - incorrectly only identifies 5 of the expected 10 risks.
Role assignment to user is exactly same, authorizations are exactly the same. The User/Role/Profile Full Sync has been repeated as part of troubleshooting.
Has anyone experienced this? I'm looking for ideas/options on where to investigate why the results are different.
Thanks
Margaret

HI:
Thanks for answering!! I'm having trouble understanding the answers, sorry.
When you have a logical system...you upload the rules once to that system, and generate them. Then when you set up a physical system and hook it up to the logical system...the 1st, 2nd or 3rd physical system....they all use the same ruleset. The whole concept (as I understand) is that the use of Logical and Physical systems...and putting the rule set on the Logical system so you don't have to worry about one rule set taking precedence over another, is an advantage, if this is possible (ie: we don't have multiple rule sets).
Where should I be checking that the risks are defined properly? The rule set is the delivered one from SAP. The functions and risks match what we had (plus more) in the CC 4.0 system.
The first physical system we set up (example: Development) works fine, and all regular SoD risks are coming up as expected. When we added another system (example: Test)...the results of SoD analysis were incomplete.
Does that help clarify? Perhaps I'm just missing something?
Margaret
Edited by: Margaret Sokolov on Apr 28, 2009 4:34 PM

Windows Server 2012 - Hyper-V - Cluster Sharded Storage - VHDX unexpectedly gets copied to System Volume Information by "System", Virtual Machines stops respondig

We have a problem with one of our deployments of Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V with a 2 node cluster connected to a iSCSI SAN.
Our setup:
Hosts - Both run Windows Server 2012 Standard and are clustered.
HP ProLiant G7, 24 GB RAM. This is the primary host and normaly all VMs run on this host.
HP ProLiant G5, 20 GB RAM. This is the secondary host that and is intended to be used in case of failure of the primary host.
We have no antivirus on the hosts and the scheduled ShadowCopy (previous version of files) is switched off.
iSCSI SAN:
QNAP NAS TS-869 Pro, 8 INTEL SSDSA2CW160G3 160 GB i a RAID 5 with a Host Spare. 2 Teamed NIC.
Switch:
DLINK DGS-1210-16 - Both the network cards of the Hosts that are dedicated to the Storage and the Storage itself are connected to the same switch and nothing else is connected to this switch.
Virtual Machines:
3 Windows Server 2012 Standard - 1 DC, 1 FileServer, 1 Application Server.
1 Windows Server 2008 Standard Exchange Server.
All VMs are using dynamic disks (as recommended by Microsoft).
Updates
We have applied the most resent updates to the Hosts, VMs and iSCSI SAN about 3 weeks ago with no change in our problem and we continually update the setup.
Normal operation:
Normally this setup works just fine and we see no real difference in speed in startup, file copy and processing speed in LoB applications of this setup compared to a single host with two 10000 RPM Disks. Normal network speed is 10-200 Mbit, but occasionally
we see speeds up to 400 Mbit/s of combined read/write for instance during file repair.
Our Problem:
Our problem is that for some reason a random VHDX gets copied to System Volume Information by "System" of the Clusterd Shared Storage (i.e. C:\ClusterStorage\Volume1\System Volume Information).
All VMs stops responding or responds very slowly during this copy process and you can for instance not send CTRL-ALT-DEL to a VM in the Hyper-V console, or for instance start task manager when already logged in.
This happens at random and not every day and different VHDX files from different VMs gets copied each time. Some time it happens during daytime wich causes a lot of problems, especially when a 200 GB file gets copied (which take a lot of time).
What it is not:
We thought that this was connected to the backup, but the backup had finished 3 hours before the last time this happended and the backup never uses any of the files in System Volume Information so it is not the backup.
An observation:
When this happend today I switched on ShadowCopy (previous files) and set it to only to use 320 MB of storage and then the Copy Process stopped and the virtual Machines started responding again. This could be unrelated since there is no way to see
how much of the VHDX that is left to be copied, so it might have been finished at the same time as I enabled ShadowCopy (previos files).
Our question:
Why is a VHDX copied to System Volume Information when scheduled ShadowCopy (previous version of files) is switched off? As far as I know, nothing should be copied to this folder when this functionis switched off?
List of VSS Writers:
vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
(C) Copyright 2001-2012 Microsoft Corp.
Writer name: 'Task Scheduler Writer'
 Writer Id: {d61d61c8-d73a-4eee-8cdd-f6f9786b7124}
 Writer Instance Id: {1bddd48e-5052-49db-9b07-b96f96727e6b}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'VSS Metadata Store Writer'
 Writer Id: {75dfb225-e2e4-4d39-9ac9-ffaff65ddf06}
 Writer Instance Id: {088e7a7d-09a8-4cc6-a609-ad90e75ddc93}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Performance Counters Writer'
 Writer Id: {0bada1de-01a9-4625-8278-69e735f39dd2}
 Writer Instance Id: {f0086dda-9efc-47c5-8eb6-a944c3d09381}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'System Writer'
 Writer Id: {e8132975-6f93-4464-a53e-1050253ae220}
 Writer Instance Id: {7848396d-00b1-47cd-8ba9-769b7ce402d2}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer'
 Writer Id: {66841cd4-6ded-4f4b-8f17-fd23f8ddc3de}
 Writer Instance Id: {8b6c534a-18dd-4fff-b14e-1d4aebd1db74}
 State: [5] Waiting for completion
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Cluster Shared Volume VSS Writer'
 Writer Id: {1072ae1c-e5a7-4ea1-9e4a-6f7964656570}
 Writer Instance Id: {d46c6a69-8b4a-4307-afcf-ca3611c7f680}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'ASR Writer'
 Writer Id: {be000cbe-11fe-4426-9c58-531aa6355fc4}
 Writer Instance Id: {fc530484-71db-48c3-af5f-ef398070373e}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'WMI Writer'
 Writer Id: {a6ad56c2-b509-4e6c-bb19-49d8f43532f0}
 Writer Instance Id: {3792e26e-c0d0-4901-b799-2e8d9ffe2085}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Registry Writer'
 Writer Id: {afbab4a2-367d-4d15-a586-71dbb18f8485}
 Writer Instance Id: {6ea65f92-e3fd-4a23-9e5f-b23de43bc756}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'BITS Writer'
 Writer Id: {4969d978-be47-48b0-b100-f328f07ac1e0}
 Writer Instance Id: {71dc7876-2089-472c-8fed-4b8862037528}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Shadow Copy Optimization Writer'
 Writer Id: {4dc3bdd4-ab48-4d07-adb0-3bee2926fd7f}
 Writer Instance Id: {cb0c7fd8-1f5c-41bb-b2cc-82fabbdc466e}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'Cluster Database'
 Writer Id: {41e12264-35d8-479b-8e5c-9b23d1dad37e}
 Writer Instance Id: {23320f7e-f165-409d-8456-5d7d8fbaefed}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Writer name: 'COM+ REGDB Writer'
 Writer Id: {542da469-d3e1-473c-9f4f-7847f01fc64f}
 Writer Instance Id: {f23d0208-e569-48b0-ad30-1addb1a044af}
 State: [1] Stable
 Last error: No error
Please note:
Please only answer our question and do not offer any general optimization tips that do not directly adress the issue! We want the problem to go away, not to finish a bit faster!

Hallo Lawrence!
Thankyou for youre reply, some comments to help you and others who read this thread:
First of all, we use Windows Server 2012 and the VHDX as I wrote in the headline and in the text in my post. We have not had this problem in similar setups with Windows Server 2008 R2, so the problem seem to be introduced in Windows Server 2012.
These posts that you refer to seem to be outdated and/or do not apply to our configuration:
The post about Dynamic Disks:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee941151(v=WS.10).aspx is only a recommendation for Windows Server 2008 R2 and the VHD format. Dynamic VHDX is indeed recommended by Microsoft when using Windows Server 2012 (please look in the optimization guide
for Windows Server 2012).
Infact, if we use fixed VHDX then we would have a bigger problem since fixed VHDX are generaly larger then Dynamic Disks, i.e. more data would be copied and that would take longer time = the VMs would be unresponsive for a longer time.
The post "What's the deal with the System Volume Information folder"
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2003/11/20/55764.aspx is for Windows XP / Windows Server 2003 and some things has changed since then. for instance In Windows Server 2012, Shadow Copies cannot be controlled by going to Control panel -> System.
Instead you right-click on a Drive (i.e. a Volume, for instance the C drive/Volume) in Computer and then click "Configure Shadow Copies".
Windows Server 2008 R2 Backup problem
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/windowsbackup/thread/0fc53adb-477d-425b-8c99-ad006e132336 - This post is about the Antivirus software trying to scan files used during backup that exists in the System Volume Information folder and we do not
have any antivirus software installed on our hosts as I stated in my post.
Comment that might help us:
So according to “System Volume Information” definition, the operation you mentioned is Volume Shadow Copy. Check event viewer to find Volume Shadow Copy related event logs and post them.
Why?
Furhter investigation suggests that a volume shadow copy is somehow created even though the Schedule for Shadows Copies is turned off for all drives. This happens at random and we have not found any pattern. Yesterday this operation took almost all available
disk space (over 200 GB), but all the disk space was released when I turned on scheduled Shadow Copies for the CSV.
I therefore draw these conclusions:
The CSV Volume has about 600 GB of disk space and since Volume Shadows Copy used 200 GB, or about 33% of the disk space, and the default limit is 10% then I conclude that for some reason the unscheduled Volume Shadow Copy did not have any limit (or ignored
the limit).
When I turned on the Schedule I also change the limit to the minimum amount which is 320 MB and this is probably what released the disk space. That is, the unscheduled Volume Shadow Copy operation was aborted and it adhered to the limit and deleted the
Volume Shadow Copy it had taken.
I have also set the limit for Volume Shadow Copies for all other volumes to 320 MB by using the "Configure Shadow Copies" Window that you open by right clicking on a drive (volume) in Computer and then selecting "Configure Shadow Copies...".
It is important to note that setting a limit for Shadow Copy Storage, and disabaling the Schedule are two different things! It is possible to have unlimited storage for Shadow Copies when the Schedule is disabled, however I do not know if this was the case
Before I enabled Shadow Copies on the CSV since I did not look for this.
I now have defined a limit for Shadow Copy Storage to 320 MB on all drives and then no VHDX should be copied to System Volume Information since they are all larger than 320 MB.
Does this sound about right or am I drawing the wrong conclusions?
Limits for Shadow Copies:
Below we list the limits for our two hosts:
"Primary Host":
C:\>vssadmin list shadowstorage
vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
(C) Copyright 2001-2012 Microsoft Corp.
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{e3ad7feb-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (91%)
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (E:)\\?\Volume{dc0a177b-ab03-44c2-8ff6-499b29c3d5cc}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (E:)\\?\Volume{dc0a177b-ab03-44c2-8ff6-499b29c3d5cc}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (0%)
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (G:)\\?\Volume{f58dc334-17be-11e2-93ee-9c8e991b7c20}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (G:)\\?\Volume{f58dc334-17be-11e2-93ee-9c8e991b7c20}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (3%)
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{e3ad7fec-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{e3ad7fec-178b-11e2-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 320 MB (0%)
C:\>cd \ClusterStorage\Volume1
Secondary host:
C:\>vssadmin list shadowstorage
vssadmin 1.1 - Volume Shadow Copy Service administrative command-line tool
(C) Copyright 2001-2012 Microsoft Corp.
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\)\\?\Volume{b2951138-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 35,0 MB (10%)
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (D:)\\?\Volume{5228437e-9a01-4690-bc40-1df85a0e6736}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (D:)\\?\Volume{5228437e-9a01-4690-bc40-1df85a0e6736}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 27,3 GB (10%)
Shadow Copy Storage association
 For volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{b2951139-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Shadow Copy Storage volume: (C:)\\?\Volume{b2951139-f01e-11e1-93e8-806e6f6e6963}\
 Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 0 bytes (0%)
 Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 6,80 GB (10%)
C:\>
There is something strange about the limits on the Secondary host!
I have not in any way changed the settings on the Secondary host and as you can see, the Secondary host has a maximum limit of only 35 MB storage on the CSV, but it also shows that this is 10% of the Volume. This is clearly not the case since 10% if 600
GB = 60 GB!
The question is, why does it by default set a too small limit (i.e. < 320 MB) on the CSV and is this the cause of the problem? I.e. is the limit ignored since it is smaller than the smallest amount you can provide using the GUI?
Is the default 35 MB maximum Shadow Copy limit a bug, or is there any logical reason for setting a limit that according to the GUI is too small?

Create Logical System in R/3 system

Hi all,
I am trying to define logical system for xMII server in R/3 system using SALE transaction. But the logical system for xMII server doesn't already exist. So I have chosen to create one. Seems there is format like <sys_id>'CLNT'<client>.
1) How to create logical system for xMII server in this format?
2) How does R/3 know in which host xMII server is running? Do we specify that somewhere? Is there any other configurations for linking xMII host and logical system?
I am new to xMII and so not aware of the steps. Please help me out.
Points will be rewarded for helpful answers.
Regards,
Harini S

Harini
Welcome to xMII.
Though i nvr used such things from the SAP R/3 system side, i think the logical system name format must be something like SAPSYS<Number> for SAP Connection BUSCON<Number> for Business Connector. After hving defined the Logical System in R/3 System, u need to configure the SAP Business Connector Interface Action in xMII-based Business Logic Services.
In additional to this, hope this following links will help u to understand more
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3861e693-0e01-0010-e791-9b44d2693e6c
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/201769e0-3174-2910-e287-baa58d198246
Wait till there comes other some suggestions/solutions for ur quieries
Best Regards
Som

Logical system name in SRM system

We are into SRM version 5.(SRM server 5.5) with the backend system as SAP ECC 6.0 .
The logical system is defined as '0000000050' for backend SAP system . All the systems like CRM and BW uses this as the logical system name for backend system . Recently SRM is implemented in our organization and we have no other choice and have to use the logical system name as '0000000050'
When product categories are assigned in the org attributes , the system stores the back end system as 50 and this is the issue. SAP support mentions that this is issue with logical system naming convention and that need to be fixed . But they fail to understand that the same name works fine in all other systems and also in SRM system except product categories .
Is there any OSS note for this fix. I would like to hear your experiences in this scenario.
Thanks
Mani

Hi Mani,
Logical System names are system specific, hence you have a different name in SRM system which will represent your backend system and this is not at all an issue. As suggested by SAP; '0000000050' is not the best name as per best practices.
You should have a name which should be of the pattern: <SID>CLNT<Client Number>.
Now here is the solution/work around. But be very careful and try this in sandbox system before being carried out in Dev/QA/PRD systems. Please make sure no other users are performing any activity while these tasks are being carried out.
In addition, please read through the ["Set up and system copy of SRM server 5.5";|https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000310782007E/SRM50_SetupTranspCopy.pdf] guide before you carry out this activity:
The below activities are to be carried out only in SRM system
I assume SRM & Backend are separate instances
1. Create a new logical system name for the backend system in SRM system as per the standard suggested above.
2. Then use the transaction BDLS, to convert the old logical system name to new logical system name in all the tables.
3. Now, the step 2 ensure the logical system name is converted appropriately in all tables except SRM Org Structure related table.
4. Use the report RHOMATTRIBUTES_REPLACE, for replacing all the old logical system value with new logical system value. Please note while providing the inputs in the screen, there will be a Checkbox field called "Sub-String", you must check this one for all attributes you enter in the report. Then when you execute the report, a list will be display, here you have to select all the rows and click the first button on the toolbar. Only then the attributes will be updated.
Please let me know, if further inputs are required.
Regards, Kathirvel

Regarding Error: Unable to Convert Sender System to ALE Logical System

Hi friends,
in File to IDoc scenario, i created a sender business system called bs_filetoidoc_send based on Standalone technical system and a receiver business system based on ABAP r/3 system. in my SAP IDES system which is dual stack (abap+java), XI client is 001 (LS: devclnt001) and r/3 client is 800 (LS: t90clnt090) i.e i'm posting idoc to t90clnt090.
I tried to send a text file. but while processing xml message in XI, i got an error saying "Unable to Convert Sender System to ALE Logical System".
then i searched the blogs and forum and found the solution. it was saying LS name was not assigned to BS bs_filetoidoc_send. so i went to SLD and tried to assign LS devclnt001 to my sender BS bs_filetoidoc_send, but got an error saying that "A business system with LS devclnt001 already exists". when i checked which is that BS, it is supposed to be the INTEGRATION SERVER itself with BS name INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV.
then i configured my sender BS as INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV itself which picked up the text file successfully and also receiver abap server received the IDOC with correct data and format with status 51. so scenario worked fine when i used my sender BS as INTEGRATION SERVER itself.
please clear my following doubts which arose after this scenario.
1) why the scenario didn't work when I used only standalone sender business system?
2) why should we assign a LS name of XI server to sender business system only in this scenario?
scenario worked according to my requirement, but using integration server itself as a sender BS confused though.
Many Thanks.

1) I can create any no of LS names using SALE
Yes you can create.
> 2) But I can assign a client to any one of those LS names (or 1 client will have only one LS name associated with it)
One Client will have one LS associated to it...and that can be any one of the LS..created.. use SCC4 to find the associated Ls for all the clients of a system
3) So anyways INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV has to associated with the client 001 only, so finally I have to use INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV only as my sender BS. Probleum is that I can't remove the LS name DEVCLNT001 from INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV and assign it to bs_filetoidoc_send BS right. If I do so, I think I would get an error saying that INTEGRATION_SERVER_DEV is not associated with the LS name of client 001.
As the logical system defined in Partner profile is expected to arrive in Control record of IDoc..it should be passed in that...
Did u checked this blog../people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/03/16/unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system so as per you need the explaination in the blog need to associate the logical system name .
HTH
Rajesh

The central system has no logical system name

I am encountering one error message during configuring the Chnage Request Management in solution manager. As follows.
The central system has no logical system name
Message no. SCDT_DIST034
How do i define it?

Hello,
You may define logical system name via Tcode SCC4. Select your client and there is dropbox for Logical System. Click on the dropbox and you may received message "No value.." and ask you if you want to define the new logical system.
Please ensure the rec. logical scheme is : <SID>CLNT<CLNTNO.>
Hope this could help you.
Regards,
AZLY

Source System Refresh with BW system Connected

Hi SDN Gurus,
We are doing a source system refresh for CRM 5.0 Production to CRM Quality.My question is the source system of the BW system will be Changed and the BW Quality will have old data. What are the Post Activities which needs to be done in BW 7.0 system after the CRM system is refreshed.
So that the Quality BW system which will be now Production can have fresh data from Production System of CRM.
Thanks and Regards
Vishwanath

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for the same.
I have another issue. My CRM Reports BI 7.0 is being displayed in Enterprise Portal, We have defined variables for user entry and they can select the values from the selection screen of the variable.
Let's say we have 80 thousand records and we have variable let's say Client Name, where the user wants to select his client name and display records for that client. The Screen shows him only 72 rows of data i.e nearly 1000 records of Client Name. But we have nearly 20000 client names, and only 1000 client names are being displayed to select from. If he does a filter (eg: A, it displays all the names starting with A, but when we say B or C*, though the data is available in the ODS table, those client name is not displayed in the Screen.
My question is how to Display all the Values or atleast when he gives A* or B* or Z* it should display those Names, so that he can see the records for those client Name.
I have done all sorts of R&D to achieve this but in Vain.
Please help me to sort this.
Thanks and Regards
Vishwanath

Possibility of connecting multiple BW systems to single ECC system

Hi all,
I have a requirement in my company to connect multiple BW systems to single ECC system. Would like to confirm whether this may not be supported by all BW extractors in particular the delta mechanism?
For logistics extractor in ECC side in RSA7 it stores BW System as target which shows they support multiple BW systems as target, but for FI extractors which keeps delta timestamps in BWOM2_TIMEST table, it doesn't store the target system. I'm afraid if we connect multiple BW systems to single ECC system, some of the delta records might go to one BW system and some others go to the other BW system when we execute delta load in both BW systems.
Thank you very much in advance.
regards,
arie

Hi,
You can very well connect multiple BW systems to single ECC system and you will not miss any delta as well. In the source system for each delta data source a delta queue is maintained for each target system.
for e.g. I have two BW systems ABW and BBW connected to AEC system then for 0FI_AP_4 data source we will have DQ1_ABW and DQ2_BBW as two different delta queues (I am not following any naming conventions, actual names will be as per the target system logical name).
The settings maintained in BWOM2_TIMEST table are across the system and they define some global settings e.g. till what time the FI data should be extracted in BW system, for e.g. the time maintained is 2.00 AM then though you do extraction from multiple systems same data will be extracted till next time interval occurs.
In summery you can very well connect multiple BW systems to a single ECC system.
Regards,
Durgesh.

Reconnect of a R/3 source system afer a BW system copy

We want to copy our BW 3.0b development system as a BW sandbox system in order to try out the BW 3.5 migration.
Therefore, we performed a system copy of our BW DEV system to a new machine. On the BW-side we ran BDLS to get a new logical name for the system and defined a RFC connection to our R/3 Dev Source System (incl. appropriate RFC users).
On the R/3 side we also defined an additional RFC connection to the "new - just copied" BW-system.
While trying to reconnect our R/3 Devopment source system within the new BW we encountered the problem that the R/3 system recognized that there already exists a connection to a BW (the old BW dev). If we take this option, the old connection is deleted and a new one is defined. However, from the R/3 perspective we want two BWs connected. It seems the problem has to do with the IDOCs and TRFC port definitions, because the IDOC type ZRSBW010 seems to point to the wrong system.
Unfortunately, we are stuck at the moment.
Any kind of help or hints to relevant SAP documents would be much appreciated.
In the OSS we found some notes on this topic (325525 etc.) but we still not sure how to proceed.
However, in general, we think it shouldn't be a problem to have one R/3 connected to several BW's or is it?
Frank Schülke, E.ON Ruhrgas IT, Germany

We worked out this scenario. Our solution came with an interpretaion of SAP documentation including SAP Note 886102, obsolete (but informative) SAP Note 184754, and the document How to... System Copy in SAP Business Intelligence System Landscapes - May 2005.
Basically the steps are...
-Using the BW transport collector in the source BW system, collect, release, and export all objects related to the R/3 source system.
-Perform the system copy of the source BW system to the target BW system.
-Change SM59 destinations in the target BW system to the R/3 source systems to invalid hostnames.
-Delete the R/3 source system definitions from the target BW system (the nonsensical hostnames in SM59 ensure you will not make any changes in the actual R/3 source systems).
-Use BDLS to change the logical system in your target BW system.
-Recreate the R/3 source system definitions in the target BW system, this step will make corresponding config for the target BW system in the R/3 source system. It is important here to activate and replicate.
-Ensure that table RSLOGSYSMAP has the correct entries for your R/3 source systems
-Import the objects you collected in the first step into your target BW system.

Can One Business system have two technical systems assigned to it

Can One Business system have two technical systems assigned to it

hi,
the technical system describes the physical view and the business system the logical view, respectively.
So in most cases you must define both but while a technical system can only link to one WEB AS, more than one business systems can link to the same technical system.
But one Business System can have only one technical system.
Logical system for senders and receivers in XI can be defined as business systems which is associated with technical systems. You may req to create BS for identifying individual senders and recievers. Technical system is gateway having the technical details and it is in the ID we designate it to be either a sender or a receiver.
Follow the link below to learn moer on it:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/97/9d84494b9f45caabe0713296d89b72/content.htm
Regards
Mamta
Edited by: Mamta Yadav on Sep 12, 2008 11:13 AM

How to integrate the portal system with non-sap system

Hi Gurus,
How to integrate Portal system with non-SAP system?
I know few ways .......Using Usermapping UIDPW method.
Using Appintegrator .....and using Business repository objects in JCA?
Is there anyother way to integrate if so please give me the names and steps for integrating it?
Thanks in Advance,
Dharani

Hi Dharani,
You can get information from the following links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/d08b00d73001b4e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?threadID=744043
SAP CONNECTORS:- Basically Connectors are like middlewares , that we use to connect to the backend system including Non SAP systems also. Will try to explain it to u with some examples of SAP Connectors:-
a) SAP Business Connectors:-
A middleware application based on the B2B integration server from webMethods.
The SAP Business Connector enables both bi-directional synchronous communication and asynchronous communication between SAP applications and SAP and non-SAP applications.
The SAP Business Connector makes all SAP functions that are available via BAPIs or IDocs accessible to business partners over the Internet as an XML-based service.
The SAP Business Connector uses the Internet as a communication platform and XML or HTML as the data format. It integrates non-SAP products by using an open, non-proprietary technology.
b) SAP Java Connector:-
SAP Java Connector (SAP JCo) is a middleware component that enables the development of SAP-compatible components and applications in Java. SAP JCo supports communication with the SAP Server in both directions: inbound calls (Java calls ABAP) and outbound calls (ABAP calls Java).
SAP JCo can be implemented with Desktop applications and with Web server applications.
SAP JCo is used as an integrated component in the following applications:
1) SAP Business Connector, for communication with external Java applications
2) SAP Web Application Server, for connecting the integrated J2EE server with the ABAP environment.
SAP JCo can also be implemented as a standalone component, for example to establish communication with the SAP system for individual online (web) applications.
To Know more go through,
SAP Java Connectors
II) ALE Concept:-
ALE is not restricted to communication between SAP systems, it can also be used for connecting SAP Systems to non-SAP systems.
By using IDocs as universal information containers, ALE can reduce the number of different application interfaces to one single interface that can either send IDocs from an SAP system or receive IDocs in an SAP system.
SAP certified Translator Programs can convert IDoc structures into customer-defined structures.
Alternatively, the RFC interface for sending and receiving IDocs can be used in non-SAP systems.
In both cases you need the RFC Library of the RFC Software Development Kit (RFC-SDK).
This link gives a great insight into landscape for Connectivity to Non-SAP systems:-
SAP to Non-SAP systems
III) Communication Between SAP Systems and External (Non-SAP) Systems using RFC:-
When you use RFC for communication with an external (non-SAP) system, you can also implement the SAP Java Connector or the SAP .Net Connector for the conversion of data. However, there are no specific security requirements for these components, since they only perform internal system conversion functions.
The additional security recommendations for communication with external systems in this section make particular reference to cases where an external system is used as a server (SAP calls the external system). If you use an external system as a client (the external system calls SAP), the appropriate SAP-specific security mechanisms are implemented on the SAP side.
This link explains in detail all the security considerations you need to take for connecting to an External Non SAP system like, User administration, Network Security etc.
Communication Between SAP Systems and External (Non-SAP) Systems using RFC
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Rudradev Devulapalli
Reward the points if helpful

I defined my PI/XI system in R/3 system SM59

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for