I get B2 after insalling gtx titan

Hi everyone, whell after i installed a new gtx titan i get a black screen and in the middle it says B2,
i have searched in this forum and it seems that it is a graphics error.
Now i would be very happy for some help,so i give you som info.
My system has been runnig for almost a year and five month.
My old card was a gtx 560 ti, i did not remove the old drivers before i put in the titan, and i shuld have done that, they were older than the
titan.
I did not updated my bios and maby i shuld have done that to, my bios is 1.3.
I have to go to bed now, but tomorrow after work, i will swap the cards and remove the drivers,
but is there any thing more i shuld think of.
3930k
X79A-GD65 (8D)
32 gig kingston hyper x
intel 520 180 *2
Kind regards
Mats Lindgren

Hi, i am getting ready to do this, but i have couple more questions.
When it comes to BIOS, shuld i take the E7770IMS.1B1 ====> E7751IMS.410 Official Bios, here on this forum.
and the ME drivers, shuld that one be the latest (9.0.2.1345 5M).
The ME drivers will be installed in Windows environment, am i right?
I wrote before that i newer done a bios flash,what i ment was dos flash,i have done one live uppdate on bios, now i know, that it shuld never
be done that way.
So to be sure that this is going to be right, i am going to do it like it's explaned in (Flashing a Corrupted bios when the alternate bios still works),
using my untouched BIOS as startup.
So question here is, you swith BIOS with the little A&B switch on the motherboard, and computer still running (and you well grunded), am i right?
Now the last one, when you have your usb tool inserted when booting up shuld i press the DEL key to get to BIOS or do it load the flash tool
when you have selected start from usb in BIOS before powering up.
How long time do you have before MEMTEST starts
I understand that i need to see the flash tool loaded, before i can swith BIOS.
I hope this makes any sense.
Kind regards
Mats Lindgren

Similar Messages

Who wants to be ready to edit 8k!? (Newegg has GTX Titan Z video cards available now)

Wow, here's what $3199 will get you:
- EVGA GeForce GTX Titan Z Superclocked (12G-P4-3992-KR) with
- 12GB GDDR5 memory
- 5760 cores
Please reply with your results if anyone has tried this card with Adobe?
Regards,
Jim

It is a pity that the graphics card does only help marginally when editing 8K.
You first need a decent system, like this one:
In that light the price of $ 3.2K is peanuts. Heck, you may be better off with two Titan Z's on a system like this.

GTX Titan in After Effects & Premiere CS6

GTX Titan Superclocked now running in OS X 10.8.3 using the latest NVIDIA Web Driver (313.01.01f03) and CUDA Driver Version 5.0.59.
I've modified both the "cuda_supported_cards.txt" file for Premiere Pro CS6 (6.0.2) and the "raytracer_supported_cards.txt" file for After Effects CS 6 (11.0.2) to include the "GeForce GTX TITAN."
Premiere recognizes the card fine and is able to leverage the Titan for it's Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA). However, After Effects reports the following error when starting up:
After Effects error: Ray-traced 3D: Initial shader compile failed (5070 :: 0)
Mylenium discusses the error in detail here:
http://myleniumerrors.com/2013/01/06/5070-0-3/
Removing the "GeForce GTX TITAN" from the "raytracer_supported_cards.txt" file resolves the error message, however, this obviously renders the Titan useless for any ray-traced acceleration using the Titan.
Any thoughts on why After Effects is reporting this error (even though Premiere is capable of enabling CUDA with the Titan) and what the solution might be?
One final note, even with the startup error, After Effects successfully reports the GTX Titan under GPU Information (see attached image below)

I agree with the above. Couple things I would add:
-1200W PSU should be good for nearly all systems, unless you are running 6+ HDD and multiple GPUs. The titan is actually very energy efficient for its speed
- IF going the overclocked 3930K route, I'd suggest the corsair HAF100 closed loop water CPU cooler, at a minimum.
- Coolermaster and thermaltake both make great cases. Airflow is very important.
- Also I have found in previous builds that 128 GB SSD for OS is not enough, it gets full very quickly. Personally, I'd recommend at least 256 for SSD overheard, especially if you want to install full Adobe CC suite + multiple 3D apps and programs.
- don't forget data backup is very important, especially when using RAIDS for projects, as they are not super stable and can have disk failures - you can get a cheap external 2-4 TB USB 3.0 drive for pretty cheap. It will save your life one day
- Definitely look into the red rocket PCI card. if you can afford it. Much better use of your money for editing red than another titan, or xeon chips.

GeForce GTX TITAN X Performance with after effects

Hi
I've build my pc with I7 5960x asus x99 with 32gb ram and
GeForce GTX TITAN X
And am not sure whether am getting the performance as the gpu is recognized as unsupported gpu in After Effects
Kindly suggest me whether I should get my card replaced with some other or what?
Would appreciate the response as am very much confused by fetching and researching on other blogs couldn't find the right answer or solution

Dhaval Barot wrote:
am planning to buy NVIDIA Quadro K5200 for using after effects with 3D ray tracing.
Please suggest will it be compatible and give a good performance?????
It is not on the list of officially approved cards. See this page for the list of supported cards: System requirements | After Effects

AE CC timeline lag & not realtime preview (Win7 GTX Titan)

As of a few days ago I'm suddenly experiencing lag when navigating around, scrubbing the timeline (as in cursor movement), using keyboard shortcuts, drag selecting keyframes etc.
Also RAM preview occasionally shows a red warning its not playing back in realtime.
This is a pretty new system that I'm only starting to use in anger and all has seemed fine until a few days ago, and I haven't updated anything to my knowledge.
I've an SSD for system disk, dedicated SSD for AE cache, 2 x HDD (1 for projects, 1 to render to).
I've deleted my preferences and purged all the cache several times and still have issues.
A new empty project seems fine, but if I make a new comp and add a new layer it starts to lag if I CTRL-D duplicate the layers (after about 20) and try to CTRL-A and expand a property (e.g position P)
As I say I've been working on a few proejct with lots of layers over the past month and not experienced the lag (though I have the red RAM preview warning)
I'm baffled as everything has seemed fine until very recently and I'm not aware of updating anything prior to noticing this issue.
Any ideas anyone?
Specs:
AE CC 12.2.0.52
Hardware:
Win7 Pro
CPU - i7-4930K 3.40Ghz
32GB RAM
GTX Titan 6GB Driver 332.21
Fast Draft:
Available
Texture Memory:
2422.00 MB
Ray-tracing:
GPU
OpenGL
Vendor:
NVIDIA Corporation
Device:
GeForce GTX TITAN/PCIe/SSE2
Version:
2.1.2
Total Memory:
5.91 GB
Shader Model:
4.0 or later
CUDA
Driver Version:
6.0
Devices:
1 (GeForce GTX TITAN)
Current Usable Memory:
5.72 GB (at application launch)
Maximum Usable Memory:
6.00 GB

Update: as a test I installed AE CS6 (after I'd finally managed to locate the download link!) and initial tests don't result in the same problems as CC. (This is both with and without the CS6 raytracer file modified to accept the Titan).
I can easily replicated the problem in CC:
1) New comp (1920x1080)
2) New solid layer - scrub timeline back and forth, fine no lag.
3) Duplicate layer - scrub timeline back and forth, fine no lag.
4) Duplicate layer a few more times - scrub timeline back and forth, start to notice lag
5) Repeat duplicate layer and I'll start getting delay in the duping process.
6) Get to about 30 layers and lag increases - scrub timeline back and forth, noticeable lag.
7) CTRL-A (delay), P (delay), click for keyframe (delay) scrub timeline back and forth, noticeable lag.
This has now made CC pretty unusable, but it was fine (bar occasional slow RAM preview playback) a few days ago!
Please don't tell me I have to roll back to CS6....
Is this the right place to report this issue? Anyone?

Rep tells me my Duel Xeons not support GTX Titan

i own/use a workstation computer for editing hd video and 2d animation - i don't game. when i purchased the machine a few years ago, a rep at the company told me that my duel xeons would only support quadro based (workstation) cards. i'm looking to upgrade the overall performance of my machine, be it a geforce gtx titan or 600-700 level gpu, or upgrading my processors, but i need to make sure that i indeed CAN switch to geforce from quadro. below are my straight from my invoice.
Intel Motherboard Dual Socket Xeon S5520SC
Intel Xeon CPU Fan Heatsink STS100C
2 x 2.26GHz Intel "Nehalem" Xeon Quad Core [8MB]
12GB 1333MHz DDR3 Triple Channel SDRAM (6 x 2GB)
1TB High Speed Hard Drive [64MB Cache, 7200RPM]
StormDrive Dual Layer CD/DVD Writer
850W Silent Power Supply
Windows 7 Pro [64-bit]
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 Workstation Graphics Accelerator [1GB]
PCI 3 Port FireWire [TI Chipset]
(additional) 1TB High Performance Drive [64MB Cache SATA 3 6GB]
(additional) 2 TB High Performance Drive [64MB Cache SATA 3 6GB]
ALSO, can anyone attest to which is better (on the whole): geforce or quadro?

You system would handle a Titan card but most of the available processing in the card would go unused. The Geforce cards right now have better specs than the Quadros accept for the extremely expensive K6000 which is equal to a Titan. When dealing with the Hardware MPE engine the specs of the cards decide the performance the GPU adds. Nothing specific to the Quadro cards effect the performance in Adobe. Now you can get 10bit color Preview with the Quadros in Adobe and you cant with the Geforce cards. The Geforce cards only support 10bit color via Direct X and Adobe uses Open GL. Beyond that a Geforce card would be far better suited. I would suggest a Geforce GTX760 or GTX770 card. Both would give you the best performance you will see from that system with GPU Acceleration.
Eric
ADK

For 4K video editing in CS6 (RED) - would a GTX Titan have much more benefit over GTX 760 Video card?

Would it be worth it to upgrade to a GTX titan (specs can be found here for both: NVidia Graphics Card Specification Chart - Studio 1 Productions and David Knarr
I know the numbers alone say it might be, but does anyone have any practical knowledge of this?
Thanks all!!
Aza

Only if you're using the ray-traced 3D renderer, which you probably aren't.
After Effects uses the GPU for almost nothing. Details:
GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) features in After Effects

In CS6 - would a GTX Titan have much more benefit over GTX 760 Video card?

Would it be worth it to upgrade to a GTX titan (specs can be found here for both: NVidia Graphics Card Specification Chart - Studio 1 Productions and David Knarr
I know the numbers alone say it might be, but does anyone have any practical knowledge of this?
Thanks all!!
Aza

Only if you're using the ray-traced 3D renderer, which you probably aren't.
After Effects uses the GPU for almost nothing. Details:
GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) features in After Effects

Upgraded to GeForce GTX TITAN Black video card. Everything is too small to read.

Upgraded to GeForce GTX TITAN Black video card and a Samsung 4K monitor, recently. Now, everything in Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 is too small to read. What can I do to make it readable?

UI scaling for larger displays was just added in the latest CC update, so I don't think there's much you'd be able to do on Premiere's end in CS6. If you're in Windows, you could use the universal scaling in the display control panel, but things might get chunky pretty fast with that.

GTX Titans in Expansion Chasis with 10.9.4

I have been searching online for this issue and found a few forums discussing it. ( here's one > http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1713478, )
It is not commonly discussed as the configuration is not common but I have no other way to reach out to Apple about this issue, so here I am posting it. I sincerely someone in Apple will read this and fix this and give some indication that they know of this issue and is working on it.
I have a Mac Pro 5,1 with 12 core hooked up to a Netstor PCIe Expansion Chasis (Similar to a CUBIX one , which also has the same problem). In the expansion chasis I have 3 GTX Titans in there to be used as GPUs for Resolve and OpenCL/CUDA processing.
In 10.8.5, System profile will show and detect all 3 Titans. And Resolve and all other apps can detect and use the 3 Ttians.
However, with 10.9.2, 10.9.3, and 10.9.4, only 2 of the Titans will be detected when 3 are installed. The 3rd one being "Display, no kext loaded". It doesn't matter which configuration, slot location, it will detect 1 less Titan when there are more than 1 installed. For instance, if I install only 2 cards, only 1 will be detected and the other as a "Display, no Kext loaded". I have tried mixing the cards, to see if it is a problem with 1 of the cards but it doesn't matter. As long as I have 2 or more cards installed, one of them will be "disabled".
If I install just 1 card, it will be detected fine and usable in Resolve.
I was hoping with every Maverick update this problem will be solved, but from 10.9.2 till 10.9.4, this problem persists. Oddly, the reverse problem is seen with Titan Blacks. Titan Blacks are fully detected on Maverick, but exhibit the same problem as the Titan in 10.8.5.
I sincerely hope someone from Apple will acknowledge and fix this issue, as it is clearly an OS problem. No Nvidia web drivers can solve it. If anyone else sees this problem, please chime in if you know of any solutions. even if it involves hacking any kext files I'd gladly do it.
Thanks!!

Apple development does not monitor these forums. These are user-to-user forums.
You should get a free developer account and file a bug report.

NVidia Geforce GTX Titan compatibility

Right now I'm using CS5 and want to upgrade to CS6. I would much rather upgrade my card and my software rather than just the video card. Before I buy the new nVidia Geforce GTX Titan for my system, I would like to know it will be compatible. I haven't seen it on the list of suggested cards, but it is fairly new. It seems to be the card to get, but the Quadro 6000 is what is recommended. The specs for the 6000 seems to be far lower (by over half) than the Titan, so I am not sure why I would buy it, except that it is definitely compatible with other nVidia Pro Video cards. I don't use SDI since I am using cards to shoot video and I use my computer for Post-Production. I also use Blender 2.66 for 3D design and animation in conjunction with AE and Premiere to clean up, edit and render out video. I am using a Quadro FX 5800 for my video card, but it is quickly becoming a dinosaur, which is pretty amazing to me that it lasted this long in the tech world. I realize this seems like an nVidia question, but it straddles both companies. Since nVidia has worked closely with Adobe for so long, I was just wondering if anyone knows. The Titan seems to run circles around the 6000 for half the price. How I would end up using the Titan would be as an engine and use the 5800 as the display card to allow the card to be maximized.

Just wondering if you read my reply ?
Looks like I can upgrade the memory with 24GB of G. Skill Ripjaw series DDR3 1600 for about $200.
Looks like a good plan.
The i7 can be upgraded to the 990X for about $1000 (and overclocked less than my 950)
and overclocking the 950 to 4.0 - 4.4 GHZ is free, saves you around $ 1000 and is about equally fast.
and the nVidia card upgrade to the Titan for about $1100.
which is absolute overkill on this system. You will not notice the difference with a 660 Ti for around $ 250.
Include the $375 for the upgrade to CS6 and I'm under $2700.
AFAIK the upgrade from CS5.5 to CS6 is $ 525 in the US and around $ 900 in Europe.
If you follow my advise, the total cost is $ 200 + $ 0 + $ 250 + $ 525 = $ 975.
That saving goes a long way for a new system, but you still would have to get that Samsung 840 Pro SSD.

GTX 680 vs GTX Titan MPE Performance difference in cs6

GTX Titan is avaialble here. Have any one tried benchmarking it? How it will performing compare to the GTX 680 the present best card? I found reading on another thread a MVP assuming will be 30-40% faster. But when considering the 6GB memory won't it give more performance?
And also let me know do we get any more performance increase by using 4GB 680 instead of 2GB 680? is that performance diffrence noticialbe?

Not completely true. Bill has tested our new MPEG2-DVD timeline, which is a single AVCHD 1080i/29.97clip with a number of effects like fast color correction, brightness & contrast, 3 way color correction, gaussian blur, gamma correction and speed adjustments and a duration of 2;39;04.
Exporting to MPED2-DVD with the preset NTSC 23.976 Widescreen high quality and MRQ turned on, Bill tested this on his i7-2600K, (OC) 4.4, 32 GB memory and the project on 2 Samsung 840 Pro SSD's in raid0, he found the following results:
Video card performance.
Just using two of Bill's observations plus his i7-960X system and my own gives these summary results:
System
Harware
Render time
Software
Render time
Gain
BillG i7-2600K and GTX 680 OC
31 seconds (5.1 x RT)
870 seconds
28.1 x
BillG i7-2600K and GTX 680
35 seconds (4.5 x RT)
870 seconds
24.9 x
BillG i7-960X and GTX 680 OC ?
30 seconds (5.3 x RT)
556 seconds
18.5 x
Harm's Monster and GTX 680 OC
24 seconds (6.6 x RT)
436 seconds
18.2 x
Here CUDA acceleration is severely tested, since there is scaling, blurring and frame blending going on. Note that the faster a system is, the lower the gain, but also the impact of a faster system on the results in hardware render time.
PS. Matt said it in his introduction, he tested with the PPBM6 file as it existed at that moment and since then it has been changed drastically. In addition Matt used the Total Time score for his comparison where the RPI score would have been better. The Disk I/O test is completely irrelevant when testing hardware acceleration, H.264-BR is largely irrelevant, it mostly is all about the MPEG2-DVD test and - at that moment at least - the rendering test.

Screen fields not getting displayed after Line 16

Hi All,
There is a screen exit created in IW51, now the new requirment is to add 3 more fields. I added the fields below the exiting fields, in line number 15 , 16 &17. After executing the Tcode I could find that the field created in line 17 is not getting displayed in runtime. I have increased the screen length. The fields if moved to line numbers below 16 then they are getting displayed. Can anyone help me to find why it is not getting displayed after line 16.

Hi,
Can you give me the Enhancement name?
I searched for the exits using package , but i did not find any screen exists for that IW51 Tcode?

Production Reporting out put not getting deleted after 30mins what we set.

Hi,
This issue regarding Production Reporting. In the workspace the report output not getting deleted after 30minutes (while publishing the report settings were like delete after 30 mins). Any suggestions please .....
Thanks
Venkat

Hi Deepak,
Please chek the field / value which u have changed is relavant to printouts of the change.
You can check with following path
SPRO> MM > Purchasing > Message > Fields Relevant to Printouts of Changes.
Confirm tick is provided for PO ( P)
Vivek

Hyperlinks from other placed indd documents or pdfs getting lost after export to PDF

after upgrade vom CS 5.5 to CS 6: hyperlinks from other placed indd documents or pdfs getting lost after export to PDF
I tried all options for the as well known and working export options

after upgrade vom CS 5.5 to CS 6: hyperlinks from other placed indd documents or pdfs getting lost after export to PDF
I tried all options for the as well known and working export options

I get B2 after insalling gtx titan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for