I have v2 of iWeb. I use standard fonts yet some PCs see a very problematic website after publishing. Will v3 resolve some of these issues ?

I have seen other blogs where it says optimisation is required. Not sure about this. How do other published sites get over this problem ? Other sites are far from simple or is it that we are saying iWeb needs to be beefed up ? As I ask - is v3 any better in this respect ?

I wouldn't have thought that upgrading to V 3 is going to make much difference. There are a few things you can do in iWeb to help the situation but, at the end of the day, it all depends on the browser that is used to view the site and how it is setup.
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Browser-Compatibility.html
"I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link."

Similar Messages

I have purchased an app from the app store and cannot seem to download it. I have tried restarting, and checked my connection but this seems to have no effect. I have also downloaded other (free) applications since then and some of these download

I have purchased an app from the app store and cannot seem to download it, the download statrs and then rapidly cuts out, it will not complete and seems to repeatedly go over the same few Mb. I have previously downloaded large files and not had a problem with them.
I have tried restarting, checked my hard disk (and repaired a sector of the disk) and checked my connection but this seems to have no effect. I have also disabled virus protection and my firewall to see if this has an effect. I have also downloaded other (free) applications to test it since then and some of these download but not the larger ones. Has anybody else encountered this? Does anyone know how to solve it?

Can you download large files from other places apart from the App store, wondering if it is the App store or your internet connection.
If it just the app store check this url http://www.apple.com/support/mac/app-store/contact/

Is there a way to still have a scratch disc and use boot camp ? it seems to kill my windows install after.

Macbook Pro
running 10.8.1 with bootcamp for a win 7 install
was working fine
had to delete the scratch drive to let me partition it correctly so I could install windows
I installed windows everythings working great
user recreates scratch drive now I cant see the windows install when i boot
it is there just unable to boot to it.

Photoshop only has one Color Palette. If you could script something like a Color Palette with two sets of active sliders the script would be in control till you dismissed its sliders dialog. You would not be able to do anything but adjust the script's sliders in Photoshop while the script dialog window is being displayed. Photoshop Scripting does not have real palette dialog type support.
I do not know what is possible with Photoshop extensions using HTML 5 Panels.....

How to use Google fonts not in an H tag?

How do you do it?
I ask this because Im under the impression h tags have attributes that come along with it to make it like a paragraph, right?
Im looking at making a few word a Google font and a caption. How would I apply this to a div? Inline? Or a new css rule? Both?
Im not good at handcoding CSS, so this is why I ask.
I have the Google font in my CSS and call a few HTML headers h1,h2,h2 to it fine. How do I make text not in an H tag the Google font?
(yes, I think it's a super easy answer, but not too knowledgeable about it)
Also, does CS5 DW have some sort of support to make the Google font a selectable from the dropdown?

Use CSS classes.
.google {
google font rules go here...
HTML:
<p class="google">This paragraph uses google font</p>
<h1 class="google">This heading uses google font</h1>
<h1>This heading uses standard font</h1>
<p>This paragraph uses standard font</p>
CSS classes appear in the drop-list on your properties panel.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

How to use Google Fonts in email?

Hi,
I would like to know how I use google fonts in my emails.
We're using the ubuntu font and I see the fonts on my computer but after sending an email the fonts change.
I'm using the addon SmartTemplate4.
Hope any f you know the answer!
Thanks in advance

Several online resources point to these two articles at Campaign Monitor:
* [https://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/3897/using-web-fonts-in-email Using web fonts in email] (Dec. 2012)
* [https://www.campaignmonitor.com/resources/will-it-work/webfonts/ Web Fonts] (permanent resource)
The first link provides examples on how to do this, while the second one has informaiton about email client support & compatibility with this feature.
Keep in mind using web fonts will have a limited effect if viewing such emails while offline.
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Default_HTML_font_for_new_messages_-_Thunderbird This older MozillaZine article] also has information about fonts use in Thunderbird. In my experience in most cases the receiving party will have to have the fonts locally installed for the best results.

I have installed mackeeper on my iMac and ia show 1945 issues, is subscibing to mackeeper the only way to get rid of these issues

I have installed Mackeeper on my iMac an it shows 1945 issues, and they have used 700+ GB of hard drive space, is subscribing to Mackeeper the only way to get rid of these issues?

Those are not real issues. I tested the MacKeeper trial on a freshly-installed OS X 10.8.2 system, with absolutely nothing added to it, and it identified almost as many "junk files." They're not really junk, you're being scammed to convince you to pay the money to buy the program so you can "fix" the "problem." There have been many reports that allowing MacKeeper to "clean up" your system can actually destroy it, requiring reinstallation.
MacKeeper is to be avoided at all cost. For more information, see Beware MacKeeper. Remove it according to the instructions here:
http://applehelpwriter.com/2011/09/21/how-to-uninstall-mackeeper-malware/

Adobe X PDF files converted to jpg, edited and converted back to PDF have ragged, unclear text. I didn't have this problem with Acrobat 9 standard. What is the remedy for this. If this is the best I can expect, I won't be able to use X standard.

Adobe X PDF files converted to jpg, edited and converted back to PDF have ragged, unclear text. I didn't have this problem with Acrobat 9 standard. What is the remedy for this. If this is the best I can expect, I won't be able to use X standard.

I can't imagine any worse workflow than converting to JPEG to edit text, then back to PDF. Text in a PDF is a vector thing, smooth at all resolutions. And JPEG is made for photos. EVERY conversion to JPEG and back loses quality but how much loss there is will vary.
If you must go to an image format, try PNG.

I have been using DREAMWEAVER MX for almost ten years to keep a website up-to-date. Can I switch to iWeb now to do the job, and if so, how do I go about it?

With MacOS 10.7 looming on the horizon, using veteran software DREAMWEAVER MX any longer does not seem to be such a good idea. I would like to use an editor that can cope with the new MacOS. Is iWeb that editor?
Specifically, I need some clarity on these issues:
Can I switch to iWeb now to create and publish content in my old website for which I have been using DREAMWEAVER MX?
Can I use the html layout I have been using in DREAMWEAVER, or do I have to steel myself for drastic changes?
How do I import the complete website into iWeb – if at all?

If you switch to iWeb you will have to build the site from scratch since iWeb can't read or import html files. Also since the future of iWeb is a little uncertain as to if it will be continued to be supported by Apple it might not be the best move at this time.
You might look into upgrading to Dreamweaver for Mac.
OT

I'm using iweb 3.4 and trying to load audio files to my web page. everything looks good in iweb but after publishing instead of having a control bar i have a "?". does anyone know what to do?

I'm using iweb 3.4 and trying to load audio files to my web page. Everything looks good in iweb but after publishing instead of having a control bar i have a "?". Does anyone know what to do?

Where are you hosting the site, how are you uploading the files and what's the URL of your site so we can examine it first hand?
Adding audio files by dragging onto the web page forces the viewer to have Quicktime installed on their computer in order to be able to listen to them. Look at the audio player options on this page of Roddy's iWeb for Musicians site: Audio Players for your Music Website.
OT

I have made a slide show using iPhoto - how can i play this on s standard DVD player connected to a standard TV?

I have made a slide show using iPhoto - how can i play this on s standard DVD player connected to a standard TV?

Try posting in the iPhoto forum where those experts are.

Should I use Standard C++ Containers and Stuff for games and other real time activities?

Hello,
I'm a C++ developer using VS 2012 and VS 2010 for developing AAA titles. I have read about not using STL and other stuff provided in the standard headers that come with VS. I read most of the stuff on the websites based on game programming and some
are really from the people well known in the industry. I have seen cases where they wont even use vector, list, map and others and not even use utility functions and algorithms. In such cases they write those containers and stuff themselves which has almost
the same interface and so much of debug and implementation time spent on such huge code.
I have two questions:
1: Isn't the C++ implementation that comes with VS optimized for the platform for better performance? Isn't it using some intrinsic functions that people on the client end doesn't know about and supplying their own implementation would indeed be
more slower in basic container operations such as insert, remove, find, swap, copy? Lets assume that we supply our own custom allocators for faster memory management to every container that we use. Also, they take care of fragmentation, alignment and stuff.
Why develop custom containers with almost same interface, why not spend that time on writing allocators and other stuff that might actually help?
2: There are times when we include a lot, a lot, of unnecessary stuff through the standard headers in a huge code base. Unnecessary, because we only needed a thing or two from such huge headers including other huge headers and so on. Now, I know templates
aren't instantiated unless used, same goes for the members functions inside them and blah blah. Since, these are precompiled headers, it is safe to assume that there is no compile time hit for that unnecessary stuff. My question is, is there any hidden effect
of such inclusions on code size (executable) that grows with the huge growth of the code base? In my opinion there shouldn't be, but I wanna know I'm not mistaken just in case.

Hi
I can tell you a story about one of our projects. We had to implement a block management system for harddisks (like the parts of file systems that allocate, free blocks and do the bookkeeping stuff). Now, one guy was convinced, that we should use the STL,
because it's easy to use and very well optimized and things like that. An other one said, that he would implement it by hand. So we decided to do both for a little test. The result was, that the hand implemented thing was much easier to write and much faster...
and the one using STL saw, that some classes were so slow, that he couldn't believe it... he then tryed to build some classes by hand and exchange them (e.g. array classes and stuff like that) and it was way faster than the STL and he wrote them in minutes
(!)... since then nobody wanted to use STL again... we don't even try it. It ended that we wrote our own string and array classes and stuff like that... easy little things that we understand. Now it's easy to use and fast and still flexible, because we know
what it's doing...
... but, that's just a story about our development and of course, we're often programming very close to the hardware and also using assembler languages often... so, I don't know what this tells us... you have to decide :-)
Rudolf

How to publish to an FTB server in iWeb 2 using the File ➙ Publish to Folder option??

I was just given the following advice regarding publishing to an FTP other than MobileMe.
Web 08 does not have that feature (drop down menu to publish from "site" icon). You will need to upgrade to iWeb 3 in iLife 11 in order to get that feature. You can get iLife 11 at the online Apple Store while supplies last since iWeb (and iDVD) have been discontinued by Apple
To pubish to an FTB server in iWeb 2 use the File ➙ Publish to Folder menu option and then use a 3rd party FTP client like Cyberduck to upload the site files.
Follon-on question, can anyone provide more details on how to do exactly what was suggested? I toyed with it and can only get it to publish to a folder on my desktop, but not to an external FTP. (I have already purchased a web-host package, just need to publish to it!)

Okay. When you publish your site from iWeb to a local folder what you will get is one site folder - this site folder will have the same name as you gave your site in iWeb and one separate index.html file.
Your site folder contains an index.html file as well as the separate index.html file. You NEED both.
What you need to do is firstly using Cyberduck or whatever, upload your site folder to your host into whatever folder you need to upload to on the server - could be 'public_html', 'htdocs' or whatever - this is your root folder.
You then need to upload your separate index.html file to your server too, but this index file needs to sit outside your site folder because it needs to point in towards the index.html file that is in your site folder - this is the first page of your site.
You don't delete or duplicate any index files - iWeb produces the two index files that you need when you publish to a local folder - one index file in the site folder itself and one separate index file that sits outside the site folder and points into the first page of your site.
Also, remember to call the first page of your site something like Home or Welcome, but DO NOT name it index.
By the looks of things here you have not uploaded your index files correctly.
What I would suggest that you do is start over - so open Cyberduck and connect to your server and go and delete your site folder and your other index file if it is still there.
Go back to iWeb and publish to a local folder again and notice that you have both your site folder and separate index.html file.
Now go and open Cyberduck again and connect to your server and note where you need to upload your files to.
Now go and upload your Site Folder to your server and once this has finished go back and upload your separate index.html file, but this needs to sit outside your site folder. If you do this, then your site should display okay - as long as your other index file is pointing into to the first page of your site it should display correctly.

How to use table control wizard using standard SAP structure.

Hi ,
I'm working on one project...
I have created my own program, where we generate sequence of numbers. This output is displayed in the table control and when i save it saves in my user defined database table.
Now i'm trying and using standard structure in table control wizard to view the data... Table control wizard is not working if we define structure..
Please help me out with the solution.
Thanks and Regards in advance.
A. Rafique

Please explain as to what u mean by standard structure in the table control, when u r trying to view the data, are u trying to populate the internal table that you are feeding to the screen structure with the entries that you want to display?

My PDF uses a font I have installed locally but is using Adobe Sans MM instead

Hello - I am hoping to contact Adobe directly about this but cannot find a way to do so, so here it goes.
Our accounting package is creating PDF's that include some text using a special bar code font, Code39-Narrow-F (Code39-Narrow-F.ttf). We install this font on all computers in the company, and I have confirmed it is installed on my PC.
I have a statement (pdf) from our accounting package that includes a line giving the total expenses using this bar code font, then under that using a normal font (Helvetica I think) so the total is also human readable.
In Adobe Reader this font is not being used, even though it is installed. According to the file properties in Adobe the "Actual font" is Adobe Sans MM. From what I have read online this is a standard built-in font used when the requested font is not found. Yet it is installed and actually if I try a few competitor PDF viewing products that font does show up. I have tried Google Chromes built in PDF reader as well as Foxit Reader and both display the bar code.
Therefore this seems to be a bug of some kind. I am testing with Adobe Reader 11.0.06 which I believe is the latest release.
I would be glad to send this PDF to someone at Adobe to review, including a copy of the font. The file itself though contains sensitive financial information so I do not want to post that here for the world to read.
Update: I have found another pdf report from the same accounting system that does show the bar code properly. Really strange eh? I can send an Adobe person this file as well for comparison.
Thank you
Bruce
Message was edited by: Bruce Spies

Most people just read PDF's, and do not create them, and as such have no control over the PDF's they are presented with. I believe some fonts also require a license to use.
Adobe and other PDF readers do try and use the local fonts when they are available if it is not embedded. The issue I have is Foxit and Chrome appear to be more successful at that then Adobe. They appear to have a wider or more liberal font search algorithm than Adobe does. I would like Adobe to loosen up their font search so their product can be just as successful in displaying PDF's properly as their competitors.
I took another look at the two PDF's I have and noticed a difference with the fonts.
The one that works says the font is "Code39NarrowF" (literally like this, case sensitive etc).
The one that fails says the font is "code39-narrow-f" (again, literally)
The font itself on my computer is named 'Code39-Narrow-F.ttf,
In the registry is listed under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts is named "Code39NarrowF (TrueType)"
I suspect then that the non-Adobe products are figuring out that "code39-narrow-f" is either the name of the TTF file and matching it that way or maybe it does a case insensitive search that does not include the hyphens.

[SOLVED]GPG no longer supports --no-use-standard-socket?

I've used an SD card for where I store my gnupghome for a long time. I have delegated subkeys and all the configuration for them there. It's mounted to /mnt/keys on vfat. These cards use a FAT file system as I use these keys on multiple operating systems.
GPG with release 2.1 has removed the 'standard socket' options, which means now if your gnupg home is on any file system that can't create socket files (see: FAT), gpg-agent can no longer run. Ironically, this is also the release that *removes* all support for running gpg without an agent!
I'm disappointed this was not considered news for arch, I even wrote a small silly wrapper just for forcing me to read front page stories! (http://github.com/codemac/yosumiru)
The GPG news page had the following:
With GnuPG 2.1 the need of GPG_AGENT_INFO has been completely removed and the variable is ignored. Instead a fixed Unix domain socket named S.gpg-agent in the GnuPG home directory (by default ~/.gnupg) is used. The agent is also started on demand by all tools requiring services from the agent.
Any thoughts on how I can keep my gnupg on a FAT filesystem and still run the agent? I'm feeling pretty hosed right now, and am pretty confused why this feature was removed from gpg agent, as this would be as simple as keeping the old functionality, but maybe forcing the --no-use-standard-socket option to be in gpg.conf
Last edited by codemac (2014-12-02 18:43:06)

codemac wrote:I've used an SD card for where I store my gnupghome for a long time. I have delegated subkeys and all the configuration for them there. It's mounted to /mnt/keys on vfat. These cards use a FAT file system as I use these keys on multiple operating systems.
That's exactly what I used to do as well: mount a USB key read-only and run gpg --homedir /path/to/usb.
codemac wrote:
GPG with release 2.1 has removed the 'standard socket' options, which means now if your gnupg home is on any file system that can't create socket files (see: FAT), gpg-agent can no longer run. Ironically, this is also the release that *removes* all support for running gpg without an agent!
I'm disappointed this was not considered news for arch, I even wrote a small silly wrapper just for forcing me to read front page stories! (http://github.com/codemac/yosumiru)
The GPG news page had the following:
With GnuPG 2.1 the need of GPG_AGENT_INFO has been completely removed and the variable is ignored. Instead a fixed Unix domain socket named S.gpg-agent in the GnuPG home directory (by default ~/.gnupg) is used. The agent is also started on demand by all tools requiring services from the agent.
Any thoughts on how I can keep my gnupg on a FAT filesystem and still run the agent? I'm feeling pretty hosed right now, and am pretty confused why this feature was removed from gpg agent, as this would be as simple as keeping the old functionality, but maybe forcing the --no-use-standard-socket option to be in gpg.conf
I don't understand why you insist on using --no-use-standard-socket...
Some background: traditionally gpg-agent is started by a DE (e.g. xfce4-session starts it). This is useful because gpg-agent also manages ssh keys. However, this is not required anymore because agents are started on-demand and multiple agents can run concurrently.
Now, if you didn't have a vFAT FS, all is good as you call gpg --homedir because it will invoke gpg-agent with the correct --homedir flag.
So, all you need to do now is to rsync your gnupg dir on the SD card to some temp dir, e.g. /dev/shm/gnupg and use this dir as an argument to --homedir, and don't care about the agent at all.

I have v2 of iWeb. I use standard fonts yet some PCs see a very problematic website after publishing. Will v3 resolve some of these issues ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for