I need multi-system media storage advice please...

I have a small video production company; we currently have two workstations, a Power Mac G4 dual 1.42Ghz and a Power Mac G5 dual 2.0Ghz. Our workload is increasing at a healthy rate. But with more work comes the need for larger and more flexible storage for our media. We primarily work in DV and more recently HDV.
Typically my editor and I will work on different projects back and forth. What we are forced to do is copy all our assets back and forth from system to system. We have multiple firewire drives on both systems but sneaker-netting them back and forth doesn't work because normally both projects we are working on may share the same drive. So inevitable, we are forced to copy it from one firewire to another or through the network. It's not over efficient to say the least, and at times it messes up backups and keeping things correctly up to date.
What we need is some sort of shared storage that both systems can access a RAID setup at the same time, but of course has enough bandwidth to serve the Power Macs their HDV media. An Xserve is a total overkill, and honestly beyond our budget.
Does anyone have any cost-effective suggestions? I would think, bandwidth-wise, something like a Firewire 800 or eSATA makes the most sense. I am very computer savvy, but I have to admit my knowledge of the different solutions and how they could work for out setup evades me. That’s why I've come to you guys!
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated! Thanks!
PowerMac Dual 2.0 G5-PowerMac Dual 1.42 G4-MacBook Pro C2D 2.33-Mac mini 1.42 G4   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

can someone please recommend a solution that I can use to store and access all my dv projects? I'm using imovie, but soon to upgrade to fcp, and am looking at the lacie 2tb raid drives. My issue is that I do not understand Raid and how it will affect my ability to access and edit directly. I tend to like to import lots of footage (60-80gb) and then work through the editing process with all of it at my fingertips. I want a solution that will allow me to put all my video in and work with it from there, while knowing that I have the ability to recover the data should the drive malfunction. Ideally I'd store all my footage on that drive long term, but not sure if that's the best way. Somebody straighten me out on this.
It's a bit daunting. I'm not afraid of spending up to about $1500 on this, but I want to be sure that I pick the correct hardware. I do not necessarily need the ability to share over network or have multiple machines access projects simultaneously, just redundancy / stability and speed for accessing during editing sessions I guess.
thanks! BT

Similar Messages

  • New System Build feedback/advice, please...

    Time to build a new WorkStation. My motivation for upgrading is that I have been using a mediocore laptop (i7m, 8gb, 250gb ) from my work as my home system for the last 2 years, I am starting to get more freelance coming in and need a good desktop.
    I am not so sure about my processor, mother board and video card choice. I am more interested in app usability than absolute throughput and want to maximise my dollar investment.
    Purchase date: this week
    Budget:  I'd like to stay close to $1000-1300, but can spend more for significant performance gains. As I do more  research, my inclinations are trending higher.
    System Usage: My primary uses will include photo editing with Lightroom and Photoshop, 3D graphics using 3D studio Max, Maya and Mud Box, HD video editing using Premiere and After Affects and  Web Design. I will also use it as an HD media player and hifi audio is important. Maximizing cs6 performance in premiere & pShop is my main target. I am focused mainly on user experience while running these apps. If I need to encode hrs of video or crank out frames in max/maya, I can do it at work. I seldom run games.
    Monitors: I'm running two Dell U2410's IPS, calibrated w\Color Munki, one portrait one lanscape.
    Parts to Upgrade: Full system build
    O/S : Win7 Ultimate, I might play with Ubuntu/Virtualization
    Vendor: Newegg unless I can save big $$ else where. I like B&H.
    It needs to be an Intel machine & I have chosen lga 2011 becuase I'll eventually go to 64gb. I'll do some modest overclocking.
    Any advice is appreciated. Thank you for your expertise.
    Processor:
    Intel Core i7-3820 Sandy Bridge-E 3.6GHz (3.8GHz Turbo Boost) LGA 2011 130W Quad-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73820
    $299 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115229
    or
    Intel Core i7-3930K Sandy Bridge-E 3.2GHz (3.8GHz Turbo) LGA 2011 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73930K
    $569 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116492
    Do you have any feeling about how much I'll gain by going to the 6 core cpu over the 4 core? Remember, for me usability in the cs6 apps is more important than marginal gains in throughput.
    Mobo:
    MSI X79A-GD45 (8D) LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard with UEFI BIOS
    $218 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130635
    or
    ASRock X79 Extreme6 LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel Motherboard
    $240 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157289
    or
    MSI Big Bang-XPower II LGA 2011 Intel X79 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 XL ATX Intel Motherboard with UEFI BIOS
    $380
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130626
    I would really appreciate any feedback on mobos in regards to maximizing cs6...7...8 performance, system logiveity, and performance. Is it worth it to go for a higer end mobo? If so which one. I like the msi's based on eventually ug to 128 gb, but are they money well spent? Any probs w/these mobo's?
    Memory:
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL10Q-32GBXL
    $130
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231490
    Hard Drive:
    SAMSUNG 830 Series MZ-7PC256B/WW 2.5" 256GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
    $160
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147164
    Video:
    GIGABYTE GV-N65TOC-1GI GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB 128-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card
    $160 w/ship
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125447
    or
    MSI N660 Ti PE 2GD5/OC GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
    Item#: N82E16814127696
    $300
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127696
    I am still a little unsure of the real world differnces that I'll realize by doubling my video card expense, advice please?
    Optical Drive:
    LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM 4MB Cache SATA BDXL Blu-Ray Burner with SW, 3D Play Back - BH14NS40
    $70
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136250
    Case:
    COOLER MASTER HAF 912 RC-912-KKN1 Black SECC/ ABS Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
    $60
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811119233
    Power Supply:
    FX Core Edition PRO650W (P1-650S-NLB9) 650W ATX12V 2.2 & ESP12V 2.91 SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Active PFC Power Supply
    $90
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817207014
    Total     $1190
    or    $1760
    I have picked the MSI motherboard due to its support for 128gb ram, superior audio and other high end features. The AS Rock for its rep for solid value/performance. Opinions?
    Finally, I would like some advice on video cards. I prefer nVidia to ATI, but I'm not sure which chip to go for. The six fifties are cheaper, but the 660 ti provides more CUDA cores.

    Alex,
    I sure wish you would quick picking fights with lots of knowledgeable people just trying to help people build good PCs for running Adobe Premiere. (I am stating that based on not just this thread, but rather the strong challenges you seem to bring to about half of the threads that you've chosen to participate in).
    I was the original poster to suggest that Neal select a larger case. Next Harm agreed and cited 6 points which I would agree with regarding why a larger box is better for a video editing rig.
    What are the typical goals for someone wanting a video editing PC? I would expect that most users want:
    - robust, runs and never fails
    - has incredible power; face it, video editing with AVCHD is one of the most taxing applications a PC can face today
    - quiet; who wants to be doing creative work with any server room like wind noise
    Now let me be specific where you are simply WRONG WRONG WRONG:
    You stated: "Back pressure increases in larger spaces due to natural impedance of airflow (much like with electricity traveling over distance)"
    Fact: Exactly the opposite; Back pressure decreases in larger spaces due to more room for the air to flow (much like thicker copper passes electricity with less resistance than a thin wire)
    Your stated: "Open non-compartmentalized spaces are a recipe for hot spots - areas of turbulence with higher temperatures." and then cited a server room article talking about cooling air taking the path of least resistance -- going under the floor in a server room, instead of through rack mounted servers.
    Fact: Lots of open space for large, slow moving fans to keep a video editing box cool is a great way to go
    You stated: "Full towers - in themselves - are worse for cooling"
    Fact: That is one crazy indefensible statement!
    I seriously doubt that you fully comprehend the differences and importance of thermal conductivity, heat capacity, conduction, convection, and radiation for you to make the statements that you have so far and these are the staples for discussing how heat transfer takes place.
    Note to other readers... There are lots of ways to cool components including cpus, hard drives, gpus and memory. I suspect that the noise levels brought by servers and some gamers would be totally offensive to the ambient noise level that you want in the room with you for video editing. Therefore we are left with just a few quiet alternatives: 1) lots of volume at low velocity (large cases, large fans, slow rpm), 2) liquid cooling, and 3) Cases with doors or baffles to keep the sound from a noisier solution from getting back to your ears.
    Regards,
    Jim

  • New Workstation - System and Storage Critique Please

    Hi. I'm finalizing a new workstation config and would appreciate your advice.   Since I'm not a photo/video pro, this workstation will be used for multiple purposes:
    Video Editing (CS3 now; CS5 when released)
    Photo Editing (CS3 now; CS5 when released)
    Sotftware Development
    Stock data processing (custom app, processing daily data)
    Office and Personal Apps (Email, web browsing, personal finance)
    Below is my system config.   I'd appreciate any feedback that you have on the config, especially the disk config with an eye towards getting decent performance for editing AVCHD (w/Premiere) and still images (w/PhotoShop).
    To limit upfront expenses, I'm thinking software RAID 0 instead of hardware RAID.   A nightly (or more often) file backup would copy files to a Backup Drive.   A weekly backup would copy files over our network to a small server.   As projects becames stale, they would be copied to a removable archive disk (currently 500Gb).
    Some specific questions:
    I understand that Hardware RAID is better than software RAID.   If I start with a software RAID now, will there be any issues with upgrading to a Hardware RAID (like an Areca ARC-1210)?
    As you can see below, I'm thinking of moving the Paging File to a separate disk.  I'm thinking of a 150Gb Raptor or maybe an older 80Gb disk that I have laying around.   Does this disk have to be fast?
    I've seen several comments about buying WD RE4 (WE2003FYYS) disks are better for RAID that WD Caviar Black.   Are the RE4 cost effective for amateur use?
    Thanks,
    Dan.
    OS                              Win 7 Pro
    CPU                            Core I7-920 (OC’d to 3.8Ghz)
    CPU Cooler                 CORSAIR Water Cooling - Hydro Series CWCH50-1
    Mainboard                   ASUS P6X58D Premium
    Memory                       12 GB Mushkin Enhanced Redline DDR3 1600
    Video Card                  nVidia GeForce 9600 GT
    Power Supply              CORSAIR 850W
    Disk Controller            Intel ICH10R controller (6 x SATA 3.0 Gb/s ports) w/ RAID 0,1,5,10
                                       Marvell® PCIe SATA 6Gb/s controller (2 x SATA 6.0 Gb/s ports)
    System & App Disk     WD 300GB Velociraptor #1
    Paging File Disk          WD 150GB Raptor or maybe old 80Gb disk
    Backup Storage          1X Western Digital Caviar Green WD20EARS 2TB
    Removable Archive     1x 500Gb
    Other Disk                   Maxtor 6Y200P0 200Gb (currently owned, but not sure what to do with it
    Video Config:
    2X Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB configured RAID 0*:
    - Video Capture         
    - Preview Files
    - Sound File
    - Final Results
    * Or maybe WD RE4 2TB
    WD 300GB Velociraptor #2:
    - Project Files

    My suggestion is use another older computer for your non-video and non-photo apps.  That way you can minimize the processes on the video/photo machine and obtain maximum performance.on it and have maximum security and safety on your Internet/business machine.  If you want a common keyboard, mouse and video display get a KVM switch like I am using.  One of the biggest problems I see in analyzing the PPBM4 results that I get regularly is way to many processes/services running on machines people are trying to use as editing machines.

  • I am unable to attach documents to a yahoo email from my macbook pro can anyone advice me what i need to do to address this please?

    Hi there;
    For some reason I am unable to attach documents to a yahoo email from my macbook pro. I do not experience this problem on a nomal PC and i can even open attachments on the mac. However on trying to attach a document to an email it keeps coming up wth an error stating ''invalid file selected'' each time i tr. Can anyone advice me what i need to do to address this please?
    many thanks

    Since your Mac probably came with 10.4, there is no longer a way to get 10.5 Leopard install media. IF it has the requirements, you may be able to upgrade to 10.6 Snow Leopard by buying the boxed install media at the Apple Store for $30.
    System requirements are found here: http://support.apple.com/kb/SP575
    General support can be found here: http://www.apple.com/support/snowleopard/

  • I have the G Drive 1 TB (GEN4 1TB) external drive purchased in 2010. I need to connect to my new MacBook Pro. I'm using the external drive for media storage of my video editing projects. Will a 800fw to thunderbolt adapter cable work?

    I have the G Drive 1 TB (GEN4 1TB) external drive purchased in 2010. I need to connect to my new MacBook Pro. I'm using the external drive for media storage of my video editing projects. Will a 800fw to thunderbolt adapter cable work? I understand that using a USB port connection is not fast enough for video editing. I read somewhere the G Drives don't connect well to MacBook Pro.
    thanks
    larry

    I doubt this can be relocated or moved so you might want to just repost in the macbook pro area.
      MacBook Pro
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/notebooks/macbook_pro
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os?view=discussions
    Can you afford a new Thunderbolt case and cable? any case with FW800 is going to be slow 72MB/sec and less, and any new 1TB drive is capable of 75MB/s minimum up to 125MB/sec.
    Thunderbolt storage can of course when setup properly reach 100's of MB higher using multiple drives.
    Use what you have for a system backup or for secondary backup storage.
    you might be able to take the drive - most cases allow you to open and swap drives - and use this:
    G-Technology 1TB G-DRIVE mini High-Speed Portable Hard Drive                                   
    or this:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/HB137VC/A/g-technology-4tb-g-raid-professional -high-performance-dual-drive-hard-drive?fnode=5f

  • Need suggession on best Storage systems fro SAP.

    Dear All
    We are at starting stage of SAP core project implementation with EHp4, so we would like to take your suggestions and recommendations on storage systems.
    The current storage we are using is Dell EMC CX700 (SAN).
    Weu2019ve narrowed down to two vendorsu2019 i.e., Hitachiu2019s AMS 2500 and EMCu2019s CX4-480
    Currently we have high speed servers in place and running only with MM, SD and FI (we will not be changing the servers).
    Please see the server configurations.
    Note: we have 3 servers
    1. CI server (ECC 6.0)
    2. DB server (SQL 2005)
    3. Load balancing server (additional application server)
    Host           Usage                    OS                     HW   model             CPU type                        CPU       Numof CPUs     RAM
    Host1     DB     Win2K3 Ent 64-bit        HP  DL 580 G5       Intel Xeon X7350     2.93     16     32 GB
    Host2     CI     Win2K3 Ent 64-bit        HP  DL 580 G5       Intel Xeon X7350     2.93     16     32 GB
    Host3     AppWin2K3 Ent 64-bit        HP     DL 580 G5       Intel Xeon X7350     2.93     16     32 GB
    We will be using the same servers for the core project kindly give us your views and recommendations or suggestions on the best storage.
    Kindly note we have already gone through sizing and the current servers can effort the core implementation as per sizing.
    We need suggestions on best storage as mentioned above.
    Appreciate your best views on this.
    Thanking you
    Ravi
    SAP basis Admin

    Don't double post
    Re: Need suggession on best Storage systems fro SAP.
    Markus

  • I need G4 MDD, Hard Drive Up-Grade advice, please.

    I need G4 MDD, Hard Drive Up-Grade advice, please.
    My G4 Model:
    Power Mac G4 (Mirrored Drive Doors 2003) - M9145LL/A
    Processor G4 1.25 GHz (SINGLE)
    - L2 Cache 256 KB (1:1)
    - L3 Cache 1 MB
    167 MHz Bus Speed
    (Dual Boot Model) - Running 10.3.9 and 9.2.2
    Installed Memory - 1- 256 MB Stick and 1- 512 MB Stick - (Kingston PC2700 - KTA-G4333)
    - Maximum 2 GB
    - Slots 4 SDRAM (PC2700 - DDR333)
    Hard Drive 80 GB Seagate
    - Type (Speed) Ultra ATA/100 (7200 rpm)
    Combo Drive
    USB 1.1 2
    FireWire 400 2
    EtherNet (built-in) 1000Base-T
    Expansion Slots 4 PCI slots
    Display ATI Radeon 9000 Pro
    - VRAM 64 MB DDR
    - AGP 4x
    LaCie external DVD Burner.
    I'm planning on doing the following:
    I'm on a limited budget, can only afford to spend around $300.00
    I Want to add 3 more 512 MB Sticks of the Kingston KTA-G4333/512 PC2700 Ram.
    Also, I Want to Replace my 80 GB HD with either of the following:
    2 - Seagate 160 or 250 GB SATA drives/8 MB Cache on the Rear Bays
    And a - SIIG SATA PCI Controller Card (SIISCSATM12S)
    OR;
    1 Seagate 160 GB ATA/100 8 MG Cache drive in the ATA/100 Bus Rear Bay.
    And 1 Seagate 160 GB ATA/100 8 MG Cache drive in the front ATA/66 Bus Bay.
    My Question:
    (Which would be better performance wise and for stability?)
    I only want to have 2 internal Hard Drives so my Mac won't over heat.
    I'm planning on Cloning my 80 GB drive to one of the new drives using Super Duper.
    After that, I'll store the drive until I can afford to get an external OWC case for it.
    I want to use the second new drive for a Photoshop Scratch disk and for temp video file work.
    Under 10.3.9 - I use:
    Photoshop CS2
    Toast 7
    Popcorn 1.0.3
    VisualHUB
    On occasion I still boot into OS 9 for Photoshop 5.5., QuarkXPress 3.2.2 r5 and Adobe Illustrator 7.
    I don't foresee being able to afford a Mac Pro and don't want to get a used G5 anytime
    soon. I'm hoping my G4 will last me a few more years.
    I suspect putting a ATA/100 drive on the ATA/66 Bus might hamper performance. And suspect using a SATA controller card in a "PCI" slot isn't as good as having a True SATA Bus, performance wise either.
    I was just wondering which would be the better way to go for performance and stability?
    The drives will be probably OEM either at OWC or NewEgg.
    I'd really appreciate some help with this. Thank You.

    beardedbob wrote:
    I want to use the second new drive for a Photoshop Scratch disk and for temp video file work.
    Under 10.3.9 - I use:
    Photoshop CS2
    Toast 7
    Popcorn 1.0.3
    VisualHUB
    I suspect putting a ATA/100 drive on the ATA/66 Bus might hamper performance. And suspect using a SATA controller card in a "PCI" slot isn't as good as having a True SATA Bus, performance wise either.
    I was just wondering which would be the better way to go for performance and stability?
    With those applications and the intended purpose for the 2d drive, i.e. video and PS scratch, then go SATA. No question, best performance (without considering the cost of SCSI) to be found with SATA even using a PCI SATA controller. PATA been left behind, no ones doing development anymore.
    I would suggest partitioning that 2d drive because PS and FS scratch disks are different in kind. FS needs unfragmented media, otherwise dropped frames and sync issues. PS scratch media are temporary and messy.
    Depending on the drives and card, SATA drives should bench (with something like Intech QuickBench) at the high end of around 80-90 MB/sec. I haven't bought a PATA HD in years, but best I ever saw was around 60 MB/sec. 80-90 MB/sec is still very good even if say you can bench better in Mac Pro.
    The Siig card you're considering is solid. I've used it in both 10.4 and 10.5, but only used it to boot in 10.4.x, never in Leopard. I had some issues with it my others cards, but easily solved by swapping placement.
    I also have the two-port Sonnet Tempo, which is actually just a purple Firmtek Seritek 2-port card. I bought the Siig first, having to get it (and a bunch of other stuff) shipped overseas. I later bought the Sonnet because I could get it locally although for a higher price; with overseas taxes, customs, etc. for only the card --- it's a wash.
    Anyway, I have two WD SE16 750GB drives in my MDD 1.25 Dual, which were originally on the Siig. With the Siig, QuickBench (I run the big 100MB files) showed 70+ MB/sec Read, around 55+ MB/sec Writes. I was a bit disappointed about the Writes. When the Sonnet arrived, I swapped and ran QuickBench again. With the Sonnet I see both Reads and Writes at 80+ MB/sec.
    So as far as benchmarks go, the Sonnet/Firmtek wins. (I know Firmtek has a line of internal cards, including a 4 port version.) But I can't say I noticed any huge difference in everyday tasks. I had some sleep issues with Sonnet/Firmtek in 10.4.x, which was solved by downgrading the firmware.
    I have FC Studio, but I capture to externals via eSATA.
    I still have the Siig, it's in my MDD 1.0 Dual used as a file and Time machine server. Has a Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1TB on it which doesn't bench to well on the Siig, but I haven't tried bench testing it with the Sonnet.
    Hope that helps.

  • ITunes. Entire music list has the exclamation marks and I can't open music because it cannot be located. I'm 67yr old and need advice please.

    I'm 67 yrs old and asking for advice please.
    I'm unable now to play the music in my iTunes playlists. 90% of the tunes have exclamation marks now and I can't 'locate' the music. How can I locate the music or remove the exclamation marks on my iTunes music list?

    Typical reasons for missing files are, you've deleted the files, they are on a disconnected external drive, or the drive has a changed drive letter, you've moved the folder where the files live in some other fashion, a third party app has rearranged the files, or iTunes has got confused about the layout they are supposed to be in.
    Generally you need to work out what has happened, reverse the action and everything will be alright again. If it is something you can't/don't want to undo, e.g. a drive letter change, then as long as you can track down the current location of the folder containing the media then my script FindTracks should be able to reconnect it to iTunes.
    tt2

  • I have just added more storage to icloud but now want to cancel it and get a refund, any advice please?

    I have just added more storage to icloud but now want to cancel it and get a refund, any advice please?

    Try the suggestion by Plusco here >  https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3404394?start=0&tstart=0

  • ALMOST NO STORAGE HELP PLEASE!

    I was uploading my video to youtube from imove and i have almost no storage left it was fine before i did it i had 85.73 gb and now i have 22.21 gb I REALLY NEED HELP PLEASE i deleted the video and the files i have no idea what it did please someone help and fast and dont say get omni disk sweeper because i cant find the files that are taking up space i dont know what files are important so please help !

    You need to change the premise of your SSD use.
    see here:
    Your Solid State Drive and having enough space inside your Macbook Air & Pro
    Solid State Drive usage premise, or the “more space / upgrade SSD” question
    There have been questions posed and positions taken by many people who are trying to use their Macbook Air or Pro’s solid state drive (SSD) as a mass media storage device, for either pictures, videos, massive music collections or all three combined; but this should not be the working premise of a ‘limited’ SSD and its use.
    In which, it’s the case of those users with either 128GB, 256GB, or even 512GB of internal SSD space, that have or are running “out of space”, that questions are raised. The immediate premise of some users can sometimes be “(how to / if) upgrading my SSD” when in fact in nearly all instances another approach is the logical and sensible one that needs to be looked into and exercised.
    Any Macbook containing a SSD should be idealized as a ‘working platform’ notebook containing all your applications, documents, and weekly or bi-weekly necessary files. All collections of media files such as pictures, music, and videos, unless directly needed should be kept off the notebook and on an external hard drive or likewise. While the ‘working platform’ premise is also the case with larger internal conventional hard drives of 1TB+, its implementation isn't as critical except in terms of data protection.
    Realistically, you should at most coordinate roughly 20 to 25% of your total SSD space to all audio-video personal use media (picture / music / video collections), leaving the remaining amount on an external HD.
    Nobody should consider any notebook a data storage device at any time under any circumstance, rather a data creation, sending, and manipulation device; and in the case of a SSD, this is more important for purposes of having sufficient working space on the SSD and reducing SSD ‘bloat’ in which cases someone is wrongly attempting to use the SSD space as a large media storage nexus.
    The rare exception to the collective usage and premise of SSD use in which a much larger SSD is truly needed are for those in video and photography professions that require both the extremely fast speeds of the SSD and the onboard storage for large and or many video and photography files. However this also falls under the premise of a ‘working platform’ for such peoples rather than the intent of many who are using the SSD as passive and static data storage for media files very infrequently needed or accessed.
    All on-notebook data collections should be logically approached as to necessity, and evaluated as to whether it is active or passive data that likely doesn’t need to be on the notebook, allocations of space-percentages to as-needed work and use, apportioning space for your entertainment media, and questioning whether it should it be on the notebook for more than short-term consumption.
    Considerations should be made in the mind of any user in differentiating the necessary system data (System hub) comprising the Mac OSX, applications, necessary documents that both must and should be on your internal SSD, and that of the users personal data (Data hub) comprising created files, pictures, music, videos, PDF files, data created or being created and otherwise, that likely unless being used soon or often should be parked on an external hard drive for consumption, or temporarily loading onto the internal SSD.
    You both can and should purchase whichever SSD size you need or see fit, but even in the case of the largest of SSD, unless use-considerations are made, and SSD spaces are allocated as should be the case indicated above, one can easily and immediately run into this quandary of “needing more internal SSD space”, in which instance a different approach in usage must then be implemented.
    However it is almost always the case, that such large media files are wanted to be stored internally rather than actually needed, in which case the external HD is both prudent as well as necessary. Additionally costs per MB are infinitely less on an external HD than an internal SSD in any consideration of data expansion needs.
    A Professional Example
    In the case of a Macbook Air or Macbook Pro Retina with ‘limited’ storage on the SSD, this distinction becomes more important in that in an ever rapidly increasing file-size world, you keep vital large media files, pics, video, PDF collections, music off your SSD and archived on external storage, for sake of the necessary room for your system to have free space to operate, store future applications and general workspace. 
    You should also never be put in the position of considering “deleting things” on your Macbook SSD in order to ‘make space’. This is especially what your external HD is for.
    Professionals who create and import very large amounts of data have almost no change in the available space on their notebooks internal SSD because they are constantly archiving data to arrays of external or networked HD.
    Or in the case of the consumer this means you keep folders for large imported or created data and you ritually offload and archive this data for safekeeping, not only to safeguard the data in case your Macbook has a SSD crash, or gets stolen, but importantly in keeping the ‘breathing room’ open for your notebook to operate, expand, create files, add applications, for your APPS to create temp files, and for general operation.
    Slim USB3 1TB external hard drive
    External Hard Drives
    External hard drives are both extremely cheap and regardless of the size of your internal SSD (or even internal hard drive if the case), you need an external hard drive with your SSD equipped Macbook for several reasons:
    1. Data backup and protection.
    2. Redundancy for important data.
    3. Necessitated ideal space for large media files for collections of pictures, videos, and music etc.
    While ever changing in price, typical portable 2.5” external hard drives in USB3 run roughly $65 for 1TB or $120 for 2TB small portable USB3 hard drives. Such drives range in thickness between 5mm and 15mm, with recent improvements in storage of 500GB drives in 5mm profiles.
    There is almost no premise in which a small 12mm thick 1 Terabyte USB hard drive cannot be taken along with any Macbook as an external large storage extension inside any Macbook carry case or pouch. Typically such external HD profiles are not much bigger than a deck of cards.
    External hard drives are a foregone necessity for purchase with any Macbook for at the very least Time Machine backups, data redundancies, and ideally for large media storage.

  • HD Media Archival advice?

    I'm soon to be the proud owner of a Sony EX1R which will shoot HD video to solid state media at 35Mbs. I want to get my storage scratch disk/archive system dialed now so I'm good to go when the camera arrives. I'm an independent videographer and I would like to have:
    2TB for active projects
    1TB for archived stock footage
    So my questions is: Can I use Disk Utilities Raid options to build a Raid that would suit my purposes without buying a pre-configured standalone RAID system.? I would need all footage back-up all the time (mirrored?).
    My current drive configurations is 3 external 1 TB drives daisy changed using FW400 and then FW800 into my Mac Pro (8Core 12GB Ram). My System and personal drives are all ready back-up up to an internal 1TB. I appreciate I'll need some more drives to make this work which isn't a problem and it will be cheaper than buying a self contained RAID from the likes of G-Tech.
    Will through-put be an issue? I will only ever need to access media from one computer. Will the drives going to sleep be an issue? Will FW 400 be a bottleneck? Any help and advice on possible solutions would be appreciated.

    Thanks for the quick response. I won't be 'capturing' so much as 'log and transferring' as I'm shooting to SxS cards. Unfortunately my Mac Pro doesn't have eSata connection and my 1 TB drives only have eSata, FW400 and USB2. So maybe my best option is to just use my everyday back-up software (Memeo) and continue on as I have been. It backs up immediately which is cool.

  • Upgrading Memory/HD/Software - Advice Please

    Hello.
    I have an original MacBook Pro 15" 1.83GHz, 80GB Hard Drive, Mac OS X 10.4.11 and two 512MB RAM
    My Hard Drive is virtually full and I already use external storage for backup and large video and media content. I want to expand my internal Hard drive and whilst I'm at it, it seems wise to increase the memory and then upgrade my operating system.
    Can someone please offer any advice as to
    a) what i might be able to buy myself in terms of hardware
    b) how then I get it fitted/who could do it for me in London and
    c) How i then transfer content, software onto new drive, many thanks
    Look for to any help, in layman's terms. Thanks

    You can get up to a 500 GB drive, and your maximum RAM is 2 GB (you'd replace the 2 x 512 MB sticks with 2 x 1 GB sticks). An AASP can swap the HDD (and the RAM, too). Here's how to find one:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1434
    Most will perform the data transfer for you - they'll clone your current internal drive onto the new drive in an external enclosure, boot from the new drive to make sure it works, then physically swap the drives.
    If they don't do the transfer, clone your current drive onto an external drive (using SuperDuper or Carbon Copy Cloner), test the clone by booting from the external (connect it, boot with the option key held, select the external drive), then when you get your computer back, boot it from the external clone and use the same software to clone the system back to the new internal drive.

  • Time Capsule as Itunes Media Storage

    I'm thinking about buying a Time capsule, but I want to know if that's what I really need.
    1) My main problem is that I can't use my MacBook to hear music, watch movies or sync my Iphone 4 through my apartment 'cause my Library is in an External hard disk that needs electric power to function, so every time that I need to buy/hear music, watch a movie from my MacBook I have to be connected to my External HD. So, if I buy a TC can I sync/stream wirelessly my devices?
    2) Also I have an Apple TV and much of the times I buy music/movies/videos from there. If I connect the Apple TV to the TC, My library stills in just one folder in the TC?
    3) The TC is always on? or it starts up when a device is trying to connect to it?
    Thank you very much in advance...

    Please check out the following article to get one author's opinion on using the Time Capsule as a Media Storage device: theAppleBlog: Using Time Capsule as a Media Drive

  • Load balancing across 4 web servers in same datacentre - advice please

    Hi All
    Im looking for some advice please
    The apps team have asked me about load balancing across some servers but im not that well up on it for applications
    Basically we have 4 apache web servers with about 2000 clients connecting to them, they would like to load balance connections to all these servers, they all need the same DNS name etc.
    what load balancing methods would I need for this, I believe they run on Linux
    Would I need some sort of device, or can the servers run some software that can do this, how would it work? and how would load balancing be achieved here?
    cheers

    Carl,
    What you have mentioned sounds very straightforward then everything should go well.
    The ACE is a load balancer which takes a load balancing decisions based on different matching methods like matching virtual address, url, source address, etc then once the load balance decision has been taken then the ACE will load balance the traffic based on the load balance method which you have configured (if you do not configure anything then it will use the default which is "round robin"), then it will send the traffic to the servers which it has available and finally the client should get the content.
    If you want to get some details about the load balancing methods here you have them:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/ace_appliances/vA3_1_0/configuration/slb/guide/overview.html#wp1000976
    For ACE deployments the most common designs are the following.
    Bridge Mode
    One Arm Mode
    Routed Mode
    Here you have a link for Bridge Mode and a sample for that:
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_Bridged_Mode_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example
    Here you have a link for One Arm Mode and a sample for that:
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_One_Arm_Mode_with_Source_NAT_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example
    Here you have a link for Routed Mode and a sample for that:
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_Routed_Mode_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example
    Then as you could see in all those links you may end up having a configuration like this:
    interface vlan 40
      description "Default gateway of real servers"
      ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
      service-policy input remote-access
      no shutdown
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.1
    class-map match-all slb-vip
      2 match virtual-address 172.16.1.100 any
    policy-map multi-match client-vips
      class slb-vip
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy slb
    policy-map type loadbalance http first-match slb
      class class-default
        serverfarm web
    serverfarm host web
      rserver lnx1
        inservice
      rserver lnx2
        inservice
      rserver lnx3
        inservice
    rserver host lnx1
      ip address 192.168.1.11
      inservice
    rserver host lnx2
      ip address 192.168.1.12
      inservice
    rserver host lnx3
      ip address 192.168.1.13
      inservice
    Please mark it if it answered you question then other users can use it as reference in the future.
    Hope this helps!
    Jorge

  • FSCM in Multi System Scenario

    Hi,
    We are doing the ALE configurations for Multi System Scenario and found
    that during testing Dispute case creation is not happening in the
    Dispute Case Processing System but happening only in Accounts
    Receivable system.
    Here is the brief of what we had done so far:-
    In Financial Accounting System(System - ID6 - R/3 4.7) - We had done
    basic FI, CO configurations. Also we had done the steps of Creation of
    Logical System, RFC Destination for BAPI Calls, RFC Destination for
    dialog calls, created Distribution Model and distributed to Dispute
    Case processing system. Also Partner profile created and Outbound
    Message Type SYNCH assigned. We had tried to activate business objects
    in outbox for the object type BUS2022. But the when checking the
    Consistency Check - Serialization using object type, the same is shown
    as Inactive.
    In Dispute Case Processing System(EC6 - ECC 6.0) - We had created
    Logical System, checked the availability of Distribution model,
    activated business objects in inbound for object type BUS2022. Here we
    are having an error in consistency check - Serialization using object
    type - that No partner destination found.
    Please help us in resolving the same and let me know if you need more
    information.
    Regards
    Hari

    Mark, Thanks for your reply.
    Can you brief how this works?
    I have company code set up in FA system. The customers in FI are called Business Partners in FSCM
    This company code is not there in ECC 6.0 system which is FSCM system.
    Now, how will the customers in R/3 system will be created as Business Partner in FSCM system?
    Regards
    Hari

Maybe you are looking for

  • Resource Bundle with JRun4 and JDK 1.6

    Hi Everyone I have been using ResourceBundle with JDK 1.4 since quite a long. Following is the code snippet to show the way it was being used. ResourceBundle.getBundle("com.app.resources.sql\\entry_sql" + Locale.US);This code runs on JRun4 (updater 7

  • Harmon kardon soundsticks

    can these be used for sound from apple tv--they have a usb connection to the computer

  • XLIFF TRANSLATION

    Hello, I have a question for anyone whom has gotten the XLIFF tranlation working. Per Oracle, they are stating that we need to install language packs for each language we want to use in translation. I was confused as to why, because XLIFF is just usi

  • How do I edit AIFC Audio files?

    I am using WireTap Pro, from Ambrosia Software, to record music off the radio. The resulting files are AIFC Audio files. How do I "cut them up" to remove unwanted sections and then join together just the material that I want? The only way I know to d

  • Corrupted after SaveAs

    Post Author: queen3 CA Forum: General I use C#/VBScript (tried both) to update database location for all subreports and save new report:- open report- update location (LogOnInfo / SetTableLocation / etc);- SaveAs.Nothing more. This works fine on my m