IBM FileNet instead of UCM as default content repository for WebCenter

Hi,
Appreciate if anyone can clarify the following queries:
Is it possible to replace UCM with IBM FileNet as the default (primary) content repository of Oracle WebCenter?
Is JSR 227 adapter available for FileNet to connect it to WebCenter (as Secondary, NOT as primary content repository)?
regards
Rafique

useful links:
UCM replacement with IBM File net
Using IBM FileNet instead of UCM
From the installation document:
The Documents service provides content management and storage capabilities for WebCenter applications. To use the Documents service, you must have a content repository > at the back end that contains the documents you want to manage. Oracle WebCenter supports content integration with the following external repositories:
Oracle Content Server
Oracle Portal 11g
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) 2007 Service Pack 2
Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) version 3 Service Pack 2I know that the marketing materials show a Documentum adaptor, but I don't believe that's been created yet. I believe that it's a legacy BEA adaptor that hasn't been officially released for WC yet.
Thanks,
-ryan

Similar Messages

Using IBM FileNet instead of UCM

Is it possible to replace UCM with IBM FileNet. Currently I am developing a portal using Webcenter Spaces 11.1.1.5 and Using UCM as content server, now I need to replace UCM with IBM FileNet, is this possible?

Short answer: no
Long answer: with a lot of effort you should be able to do it... The think is that all the content related taskflows like document explorer, content presenter and so on are using the JCR 1.0 standard. There is currently no adapter available for FileNet so you could write one using the JCR specifications and expose it to webcenter.
Otherwise, you can also use FileNet API to create your own taskflows but that is building all the functionality from scratch.
There is no easy way to just replace UCM with FileNet because FileNet is currently not supported by WebCenter as document repository.

Changing content repository for external archiving:

Recently my company is in the process of transitioning from one document archiving server to another. We configured a new content repository in our system, and then I used transaction OACT to change the content repository for the category of documents that I am working with.
This appeared to work well on development, old documents on the server A were still accessible, newly created documents were archiving succesfully to server B.
The problem arose when I attempted to transport my change to the QA server. It seems that when a change to a content repository field is made in transaction OACT the transports do not contain a change to that field, so I cannot change it in QA.
The following entries are created in my transport:
IMG Activity Define Content Categories
     View Maintenance: Data
         V_SDOKSTCA
             SDOKSTCAE
             SDOKSTCAT
             SDOKSTCDSP
I can change the Document Area, but the content repository field is not included in the transport. Has anyone else run into this when migrating between archving servers?

It seems that it isn't a good idea to change the content repository for this type of object once a system has gone live. I'm planning to have all of the documents previously archived migrated to the new server and once that occurs I'll edit this field directly in production...
If anyone has a better suggestion please let me know.

Document type to default content repository

Is it possible to configure the DMS system so that when you create a document using CV01N and check in the original (using a KPro document type) it will enter it into a content repository by default, without using the pop-up box.
For example a document of type DMO (if DMO it has KPRO checked in it's setup) - always puts the original document in DMS_C1_ST?
Thanks for any advice.

Dear Arthur,
if I understood your latest information correctly your request is that
the files are stored automatically to storage category if
you add a file of a specific workstation application to a document info record and save it.
This first setting enables the automatic start of the checkin
process. But to have a specific storage category choosen for an
original workstation application, you have to do another setting and
create a profile in your system in the customizing under
- Cross Application Components
     - Document Management System
         - General Data
             - Define profile
For this profile pleasee add your workstation applications under
"Determine definitions for applications". Here you can maintain the
default storage category for this application in field 'Storage cat.'.
Since this profile is created assign it to all your users directly.
Then if an user adds a new original file and chooses a workstation
application the system should take the storage category automatically
from the profile.
To achieve an automatic checkin behavior the additional required setting here are the flags
"Checkin" and "Checkin required" which must be set for the used document status in transaction DC10.
Another proposal would be to use the BADI DOCUMENT_STORAGE01 which
shoudl offer also methods to control which storage category should
be taken for which workstation application.
I hope that this information could be useful for you. To set up this
scenario in detail I would recommend you to contact your local
consulting organisation too which will help you in realising a solution
that meets all your requirements.
Best regards,
Christoph

Setting a default content area for simple search

How to set up a default content area/all content areas for simple search when searching from a page?
The only way i can set a content area, is to go to advanced search and specify the content area or say all content areas
When i am searching from a content area, simple search searches the same content area.

Harish,
One simple way is create a navigation bar in the content area you are interested in searching, containing just the search element, and expose that navigation bar as a portlet.
Now you can add this portlet to any page and the search will search only on the content area it belongs to.
null

Linking DMS to a Content Repository for Recipe Management

How do I link a document type to a content repository?
This is for Recipe Management. When I look in DC10 I can see that there is a document type of RMS for Recipe Management.
I assume this means Recipe Management is connected toDMS
I have created a content repository ZRM using OAC0.
How do I make the link between the document type RMS in DMS and the content repository ZRM?

Thanks for the reply but it isn't really what I was after.
I am only the basis guy so I am not sure of the application but my expectation is that users will save a document with a document type of RMS. This document should be saved to a Content Repository
What you have described is how to save a type of document such as MS Word to a particular repository. I was hoping that Recipe Management documents (possibly MS Word, possibly not) would go to a Recipe Management Repository.
There still might be the possibility that documents (possibly MS Word) for other projects e.g. packaging could be written to a different repository.
What I am hoping for is a link from the document type RMS in DC10 to the Content Repository defined in OAC0.
I have a suspicion this is via the category defined by OACT.
The link from SAP DMS to Content Repository seems fundamental to me. I am surprised no one has the answer
...or perhaps I have completely missed the point?
Tony

Content Repository for SAP Digital Personnel Files

Hi,
I am trying to configure and use SAP DPF to store employee's certifications and document. I had created record model and manage to create Personnel Records with tcode SRMRECORDSCREATE.
I am now trying to find out where the document loaded is stored in the SAP standard configuration. I searched from online help and documentation, it mentioned that it is based on the content repository that it is set. However, i couldn't find the standard Content Repository that SAP DPF is using.
I need to store the document in the external content server.
Thanks
Yin Mun

Hi Andy,
I could not find content repository standard 'ASR_DPF' in tcode OAC0.
Is anything missing?
Regards.

Sharepoint 2007 as Content repository for KM

Hello
Any one know if it is possible to define Sharepoint as repository for KM (EP7 SP10)?
TNX
Erez

Hi Erez,
I am not sure about the interoperability between Sharepoint 2007 and EP7 SP10. But there is a document about the interoperability of older versions. Find it <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e891378-0601-0010-5386-a3387f1b161b">here</a>.
Basically, SAP Knowledge Management can be used as a WebDAV server or a WebDAV client. In a scenario as a WebDAV client, SAP KM provides an access to documents stored on other WebDAV-enabled servers. For this purpose, you use the WebDAV repository
manager.
The setting up the access to documents in SharePoint Document Libraries does not dif-
fer from the default procedure and comprises following steps:
     Define an HTTP system in the CM system landscape.
     Create a cache for the WebDAV repository manager.
     Configure the repository manager parameters for the WebDAV repository man-
        ager.
That should still work for the new versions of Sharepoint and EP.
Hope I could help!
Best regards,
Martin

Configuring content repository for project archiving

Hi Experts,
Self have done the below steps for archiving projects.
1) Created a project, released it and set the status DLFL and DLT for the project through CN80.
2) For archving created the variant and saved it. For start date gave as immediate. For spool parameter selcted on printer and saved it.
3) In customizing Maintained the created variant as test mode variant and production mode variant. Selected the delete jobs as "Start Automatically". In "Place file in storage system' self have given the content repository created in Knowledge management in Define content repository. The content repository which i created was not available in F4 but just gave the name which i created. "Store before deleting check box" was checked and "Delete program reads from storage system" was also checked and then the data's are saved.
4) When i executed the variant, archiving was happening properly but storage was not successful. I was also able to access the project in CJ20N
5) In retreival of CN80 i was able to retreive the archived project as well when i give the archive version number, hence self think archving has happened properly.
My confusion is when i check "From database" check box and give the project in retreival then also the project is getting retreived. Self feel the project must not be available in physical database.
Help me in below points
1) Will the project be read only in CJ20n when the project is archived?
2) Steps to configure storage system in archving projects.
3) Do i need to do anything more than the stpes specified above.
Thanks,
Visvesh

Hello Swarna,
I will always prefer to use a different content repository rather than going with other repository which is already in use. This will help in management of post archive pdf documents effectively in content server as well as legal requirement management.
If one file size is 95 MB then if system takes 04secs to archive then it is very good response.
I am thinking that you wanted to mention it as 0.95MB but by mistake u mentioned as 95MB.
If it is 95MB then for archiving 10000 pdf documents it will require full day.
However for 0.95MB size of pdf file archiving i would suggest to go with saparate content repository.
Hope this answer will help you to take up further decisions.
-Thanks,
Ajay

Single content repository for multiple archiving objects?

We have three archiving objects that the business has basically set the same retention period for all of them (April 1: archive previous year (current-1), delete archived data from the year before (current-2)). Rather than have three separate repositories, would it be a good practice to place these three (and any other that meet the criteria) into the same repository making the management of these simpler (deleting from IXOS)?
Thank you,
Skip howell
Limited Brands

Hi,
COntent repository can be single or multiple. It depends on the clients requirements.
How ever you can recommend to your client based on the following best practices :\
(1) COntent repositories can be created and allocated based on the archive object.This will help the client to maintain the archive files and also use them at a later stage for retrieval/audit or any other purpose.
(2) Content repositories can also be created and allocated based on the retention time .
(3) Single content rep for multiple objects is technically possible but this is not a good approach.If this is done, then utmost care needs to be taken during the Archive file naming convention ( while archiving the data for a particular object) . Such a naming convention would reduce the hassels of getting the archived files mixing up. this will also help you to better manage the archive files of different objects in a single content rep.
DIfferent clients may use any of the approact based on their records management strategy.
Hope this information helps.

Content Repository for Image Archiving

Hello Experts,
We designed a Report to archive PDF files . Each file size is about 95 MB. We are planning to archive 10000 / Day .
In the Program we made use of some standard Archiving Functions to archive and to update in the Archive Link Tables.
In the Dev system it took 1 second for each file to archive.
In Test system It has taken 4 seconds for one PDf file.
Since the Content Repository I used in the Test system is being used by many Data and Document Archiving Objects, I changed the Document type to get linked to another Content Repository. Then it took 1 second to archive One file.
Do we need to have separate a CREP for this ?. Does the CREP has any impact in the archival and Retrieval of Documents?.
Any Suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Regards - Swarna.

Hello Swarna,
I will always prefer to use a different content repository rather than going with other repository which is already in use. This will help in management of post archive pdf documents effectively in content server as well as legal requirement management.
If one file size is 95 MB then if system takes 04secs to archive then it is very good response.
I am thinking that you wanted to mention it as 0.95MB but by mistake u mentioned as 95MB.
If it is 95MB then for archiving 10000 pdf documents it will require full day.
However for 0.95MB size of pdf file archiving i would suggest to go with saparate content repository.
Hope this answer will help you to take up further decisions.
-Thanks,
Ajay

Changing Applications default content type for e.g fro Adobe Acrobat 7 to Adobe Acrobat Document

How can I change the default Applications content type, currently it point to Adobe Acrobat 7.0 the correct content type should be Adobe Acrobat Document.

See the [[managing file types]] article, in particular the section on changing download actions. You may need to select "Use other" and browse to the application if it is not listed as one of the default options.

Is there a way to rename an object (instead of seeing the default "group" name for an object?

I have about 10 objects that are named "group" in the inspector. Does anyone know how to rename these so that it make it easier to manage transition effects between them?

Hi Ryan,
I know about two ways:
either using the Timebased widget by Jim Leichliter http://captivatedev.com/2012/09/26/adobe-captivate-6-0-free-widget-time-based-actions/ only for SWF
or using micronavigation: http://blog.lilybiri.com/micro-navigation-in-adobe-captivate
Lilybiri

Assign default content type to any library automactially when site get created or people add the library

we are on on premise environment, and we have a requirement that when people create a site or a sub site or even when they add a new document library , we want to ensure our custom content type is assigned as default content type to this library.
the question is that is there any non-full trust solution, i know we probably can do it via feature stapling, or custom site template stuff. but they are NOT considered as we want PLA compliance

Hi,
As I understand, you would like to asscoiate a custom content type to a library when the library is created.
With OOB option, you could try add this content type to an existing library, and save library as template. Then the library template should appear in Your Apps page, that is to say, users can directly create document library based on this template.
As I tested, new document library created based on this template contains custom content type by default.
With programatically methods, please refer to the similar threads below:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ec9e243b-ea4c-4a46-8780-75a3a5659164/mysite-add-content-type-to-document-library-by-default?forum=sharepointadminprevious
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e58eb107-daa5-4a51-a139-dca2b1cf8591/set-default-content-type-for-document-libraries-on-a-custom-site-template?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
Regards,Please
remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Document Set default content type

When defining a document set, you can define what content types can be used in a document set. If, after uploading a document, the user cancels the properties page, the default content type for the library is assigned to the document (even though the
document set does not permit the content type). This is obviously a bug. There have been several posts on this and it appears 2013 has the bug as well as 2010.
We are seeking a work around to this bug.
Is it possible in in the client object model by placing a CEWP in the editform.aspx to force a content type on the item when the form is loaded?
The other option is to modifiy the url that opens EditForm.aspx to force the content type. Unfortunately the link that opens the EditForm.aspx page cannot be modified in the document library.

Hi Clem_FRB,
I did a test in my environment and I reproduce this issue.
As a workaround, I suggest you change the content type or return an error in ItemAdded Event Receiver for document library.
Here is a similar thread for you reference:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/21986/document-sets-dont-enforce-allowed-content-types-when-multiple-doc-set-ct-are-a
More information for your reference:
http://www.niteenbadgujar.com/2013/05/change-default-content-type.html
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/281fa281-7071-4beb-b275-e3179ce2cc08/how-to-set-default-content-type-in-document-library-using-client-object-model?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
Best Regards
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Zhengyu Guo
TechNet Community Support

IBM FileNet instead of UCM as default content repository for WebCenter

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for