ICloud photos process takes too much network resources

Photos of iCloud process takes too much network resources in the background and slows down a lot the iMAC. Almost impossible to navigate or use applications that uses internet connections.
I would like to pause the process or to configure it somehow to prevent excesive network utilization.

Do you have iPhoto setup to import all Photo Stream photos into your library? If so uncheck the circled checkbox in this screenshot and see if that will speed up things:
You'll have to manually import from the Photo Stream after that.
OT

Similar Messages

Theater 550 Pro's PowerCinema 4 take too much CPU resource?

Hello all Theater 550 Pro users,
I am experiencing Power Cinema 4 is taking too much CPU utilization on my PC, versus any other TV viewer apps like WinAmp TV, FlyTV, etc. CLCapSvc.exe is the process that blatantly taking most juice out of the CPU, causing TV viewing experience on Power Cinema 4 bad. Anyone know how to fix this? Any known patch for Powercinema4?
Now I'm using WinAmp's TV plugin until I find a better TV Viewer prog. Any suggestion?
Do you guys use any other TV Viewer app?

Thanks Stu. I'm still figuring how to get mediaportal working on my PC as over here only have analog TV, no EPG, no scheduler, no nothing... just plain old TV Viewer is all I want. However, PowerCinema4's CLCapSvc.exe issue shouldn't be ignored too...

Additional photo folders take too much iphone space

Hi there,
I have a problem with my pictures and the way iPhone handles them.
I have an iPhone 4S and a PC. The problem I have is that I have 2 additional camera folders on my iPhone: I have the standard "Camera roll", and after updating iTunes last time I got "Photo Library" and "iPhone [my name]", they just appeared without my knowledge. I didn't create those folders and I don't need them. I would like to delete them without deleting my other photos from the camera roll.
The main problem with those folders is that itunes says that my pictures/videos use 9.6GB of space, but when I check them out in Windows, it says only 1.3GB. My camera roll folder has 100 pics and 2 videos, but those other folders have like 356 pics and 10 videos. On my iphone I currently have only those pictures that camera roll sees. It's much closer to 1.3 because 100 pics and 2 short videos can't be 9GB! So I guess those duplicate folders are filling the iphone with useless data.
I never sync photos, I just copy them from my iPhone to my PC folder manualy. I don't want to sync photos as I want different pics on my iPhone and on my PC - on my iphone I want just a few pics that I want to show to other people (like my baby, cats etc), and on my PC I want all the pics I ever took.
What am I missing? Do I have to do something with photo sync or is there an option in the itunes that I can delete those old photos? Can I manualy delete something from the "Iphone [my name]" folder on my PC or something?
Thanks in advance,
Pikka

I'm running iOS 5.1 on my iPhone4 and my new iPad3. But I never saw this color effect on my iPhone3G or iPod2G as well. I did sync some slideshows as well, but that is done on a Mac, not a Windows PC.
What are the settings on your camera when you shoot the photos? Is the sRGB profile embedded by the camera? Any RAW formated pictures involved?

In the closure of Adobe, the process remains active and takes too much resource processor. Expected results:The process AdobRd32.exe has to be correctly closed.

In the closure of Adobe, the process remains active and takes too much resource processor.
Expected results:The process AdobRd32.exe has to be correctly closed.

I'm not sure on a Mac, but when I have this issue, I simply kill the thread (task-manager/processes/select the process, kill thread)
I have had no ill effects doing this.
It is my belief, it is the cloud, since they have a dcc connection, you can disconnect from the cloud, close everything, and the cloud is still connected to you. This is a feature of their update process I suppose.(speculation) Additionally, I remember reading somewhere this issue was due to applying administrative permission at the instigation of the installation. (which I do allow *some* trusted companies to have this so updates can be applied during my downtime. )
I have never had any overt issues after killing the thread and I have done that many times.
Hope this helps

Bootcamp: WinXP: Network initialization takes too much time

Hey
I've set up a BootCamp partition on my Macbook 6,1: Windows XP Professional 32-bit SP3 (up-to-date).
Its a fresh installation, with latest BootCamp drivers.
From start on, the network-initialization takes too much time:
- Windows boots up
- Enter password
- Desktop appear
- after 2-3 minutes, the network symbols appear in the taskbar.
If I open the System Control panel and want to enter the networking-devices it loads until network is really initiated.
I also can't browse to any web-site (through IE).
So, it seems that something blocks or prevent the networking from fast start-up.
I've tried to disable WLAN, same problem
If I disconnect all connections (no LAN-cable, no WLAN configured) its still the same problem.
Does anybody have a similar issue?

You can read: I have installed BootCamp (Lions one said no, but I have an MacBook 6,1 - Yep, this one was shipped with Snow Leopard, so I have the "old" BootCamp drivers with XP-drivers on my Install-disc.).
The BootCamp drivers from the Mac OSX 10.6 CD are installed and updated through Apple-Update.
So, WinXP should be supported?

SELECT query takes too much time! Y?

Plz find my SELECT query below:
select w~mandt
wvbeln wposnr wmeins wmatnr wwerks wnetwr
wkwmeng wvrkme wmatwa wcharg w~pstyv
wposar wprodh wgrkor wantlf wkztlf wlprio
wvstel wroute wumvkz wumvkn wabgru wuntto
wawahr werdat werzet wfixmg wprctr wvpmat
wvpwrk wmvgr1 wmvgr2 wmvgr3 wmvgr4 wmvgr5
wbedae wcuobj w~mtvfp
xetenr xwmeng xbmeng xettyp xwepos xabart
x~edatu
xtddat xmbdat xlddat xwadat xabruf xetart
x~ezeit
into table t_vbap
from vbap as w
inner join vbep as x on xvbeln = wvbeln and
xposnr = wposnr and
xmandt = wmandt
where
( ( werdat > pre_dat ) and ( werdat <= w_date ) ) and
( ( ( erdat > pre_dat and erdat < p_syndt ) or
( erdat = p_syndt and erzet <= p_syntm ) ) ) and
w~matnr in s_matnr and
w~pstyv in s_itmcat and
w~lfrel in s_lfrel and
w~abgru = ' ' and
w~kwmeng > 0 and
w~mtvfp in w_mtvfp and
x~ettyp in w_ettyp and
x~bdart in s_req_tp and
x~plart in s_pln_tp and
x~etart in s_etart and
x~abart in s_abart and
( ( xlifsp in s_lifsp ) or ( xlifsp = ' ' ) ).
The problem: It takes too much time while executing this statement.
Could anybody change this statement and help me out to reduce the DB Access time?
Thx

Ways of Performance Tuning
1.     Selection Criteria
2.     Select Statements
     Select Queries
     SQL Interface
     Aggregate Functions
     For all Entries
Select Over more than one internal table
Selection Criteria
1.     Restrict the data to the selection criteria itself, rather than filtering it out using the ABAP code using CHECK statement.
2.     Select with selection list.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA.
CHECK: SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
         SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below which avoids CHECK, selects with selection list
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE BOOKID FROM SBOOK INTO TABLE T_SBOOK
WHERE SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
              SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
Select Statements   Select Queries
1.     Avoid nested selects
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO EKKO_WA.
SELECT * FROM EKAN INTO EKAN_WA
      WHERE EBELN = EKKO_WA-EBELN.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below.
SELECT PF1 PF2 FF3 FF4 INTO TABLE ITAB
    FROM EKKO AS P INNER JOIN EKAN AS F
      ON PEBELN = FEBELN.
Note: A simple SELECT loop is a single database access whose result is passed to the ABAP program line by line. Nested SELECT loops mean that the number of accesses in the inner loop is multiplied by the number of accesses in the outer loop. One should therefore use nested SELECT loops only if the selection in the outer loop contains very few lines or the outer loop is a SELECT SINGLE statement.
2.     Select all the records in a single shot using into table clause of select statement rather than to use Append statements.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA.
CHECK: SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
         SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below which avoids CHECK, selects with selection list and puts the data in one shot using into table
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE BOOKID FROM SBOOK INTO TABLE T_SBOOK
WHERE SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
              SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
3.     When a base table has multiple indices, the where clause should be in the order of the index, either a primary or a secondary index.
To choose an index, the optimizer checks the field names specified in the where clause and then uses an index that has the same order of the fields. In certain scenarios, it is advisable to check whether a new index can speed up the performance of a program. This will come handy in programs that access data from the finance tables.
4.     For testing existence, use Select.. Up to 1 rows statement instead of a Select-Endselect-loop with an Exit.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA
UP TO 1 ROWS
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code is more optimized as compared to the code mentioned below for testing existence of a record.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA
    WHERE CARRID = 'LH'.
EXIT.
ENDSELECT.
5.     Use Select Single if all primary key fields are supplied in the Where condition .
If all primary key fields are supplied in the Where conditions you can even use Select Single.
Select Single requires one communication with the database system, whereas Select-Endselect needs two.
Select Statements SQL Interface
1.     Use column updates instead of single-row updates
to update your database tables.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT INTO SFLIGHT_WA.
SFLIGHT_WA-SEATSOCC =
    SFLIGHT_WA-SEATSOCC - 1.
UPDATE SFLIGHT FROM SFLIGHT_WA.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
UPDATE SFLIGHT
       SET SEATSOCC = SEATSOCC - 1.
2.     For all frequently used Select statements, try to use an index.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO SBOOK_WA
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'
    AND CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
SELECT * FROM SBOOK CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO SBOOK_WA
WHERE MANDT IN ( SELECT MANDT FROM T000 )
    AND CARRID = 'LH'
    AND CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
3.     Using buffered tables improves the performance considerably.
Bypassing the buffer increases the network considerably
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
BYPASSING BUFFER
WHERE     SPRSL = 'D'
        AND ARBGB = '00'
        AND MSGNR = '999'.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
WHERE     SPRSL = 'D'
        AND ARBGB = '00'
        AND MSGNR = '999'.
Select Statements Aggregate Functions
     If you want to find the maximum, minimum, sum and average value or the count of a database column, use a select list with aggregate functions instead of computing the aggregates yourself.
Some of the Aggregate functions allowed in SAP are MAX, MIN, AVG, SUM, COUNT, COUNT( * )
Consider the following extract.
            Maxno = 0.
            Select * from zflight where airln = LF and cntry = IN.
             Check zflight-fligh > maxno.
             Maxno = zflight-fligh.
            Endselect.
The above mentioned code can be much more optimized by using the following code.
Select max( fligh ) from zflight into maxno where airln = LF and cntry = IN.
Select Statements For All Entries
     The for all entries creates a where clause, where all the entries in the driver table are combined with OR. If the number of entries in the driver table is larger than rsdb/max_blocking_factor, several similar SQL statements are executed to limit the length of the WHERE clause.
     The plus
     Large amount of data
     Mixing processing and reading of data
     Fast internal reprocessing of data
     Fast
     The Minus
     Difficult to program/understand
     Memory could be critical (use FREE or PACKAGE size)
Points to be must considered FOR ALL ENTRIES
     Check that data is present in the driver table
     Sorting the driver table
     Removing duplicates from the driver table
Consider the following piece of extract
          Loop at int_cntry.
Select single * from zfligh into int_fligh
where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Append int_fligh.
                      Endloop.
The above mentioned can be more optimized by using the following code.
Sort int_cntry by cntry.
Delete adjacent duplicates from int_cntry.
If NOT int_cntry[] is INITIAL.
            Select * from zfligh appending table int_fligh
            For all entries in int_cntry
            Where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Endif.
Select Statements Select Over more than one Internal table
1.     Its better to use a views instead of nested Select statements.
SELECT * FROM DD01L INTO DD01L_WA
WHERE DOMNAME LIKE 'CHAR%'
        AND AS4LOCAL = 'A'.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM DD01T INTO DD01T_WA
    WHERE   DOMNAME    = DD01L_WA-DOMNAME
        AND AS4LOCAL   = 'A'
        AND AS4VERS    = DD01L_WA-AS4VERS
        AND DDLANGUAGE = SY-LANGU.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be more optimized by extracting all the data from view DD01V_WA
SELECT * FROM DD01V INTO DD01V_WA
WHERE DOMNAME LIKE 'CHAR%'
        AND DDLANGUAGE = SY-LANGU.
ENDSELECT
2.     To read data from several logically connected tables use a join instead of nested Select statements. Joins are preferred only if all the primary key are available in WHERE clause for the tables that are joined. If the primary keys are not provided in join the Joining of tables itself takes time.
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO EKKO_WA.
SELECT * FROM EKAN INTO EKAN_WA
      WHERE EBELN = EKKO_WA-EBELN.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below.
SELECT PF1 PF2 FF3 FF4 INTO TABLE ITAB
    FROM EKKO AS P INNER JOIN EKAN AS F
      ON PEBELN = FEBELN.
3.     Instead of using nested Select loops it is often better to use subqueries.
SELECT * FROM SPFLI
INTO TABLE T_SPFLI
WHERE CITYFROM = 'FRANKFURT'
    AND CITYTO = 'NEW YORK'.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT AS F
    INTO SFLIGHT_WA
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_SPFLI
    WHERE SEATSOCC < F~SEATSMAX
      AND CARRID = T_SPFLI-CARRID
      AND CONNID = T_SPFLI-CONNID
      AND FLDATE BETWEEN '19990101' AND '19990331'.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be even more optimized by using subqueries instead of for all entries.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT AS F INTO SFLIGHT_WA
    WHERE SEATSOCC < F~SEATSMAX
      AND EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM SPFLI
                     WHERE CARRID = F~CARRID
                       AND CONNID = F~CONNID
                       AND CITYFROM = 'FRANKFURT'
                       AND CITYTO = 'NEW YORK' )
      AND FLDATE BETWEEN '19990101' AND '19990331'.
ENDSELECT.
1.     Table operations should be done using explicit work areas rather than via header lines.
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X BINARY SEARCH.
IS MUCH FASTER THAN USING
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X'.
If TAB has n entries, linear search runs in O( n ) time, whereas binary search takes only O( log2( n ) ).
2.     Always try to use binary search instead of linear search. But dont forget to sort your internal table before that.
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X'. IS FASTER THAN USING
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY (NAME) = 'X'.
3.     A dynamic key access is slower than a static one, since the key specification must be evaluated at runtime.
4.     A binary search using secondary index takes considerably less time.
5.     LOOP ... WHERE is faster than LOOP/CHECK because LOOP ... WHERE evaluates the specified condition internally.
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA WHERE K = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.
The above code is much faster than using
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA.
CHECK WA-K = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.
6.     Modifying selected components using MODIFY itab TRANSPORTING f1 f2.. accelerates the task of updating a line of an internal table.
WA-DATE = SY-DATUM.
MODIFY ITAB FROM WA INDEX 1 TRANSPORTING DATE.
The above code is more optimized as compared to
WA-DATE = SY-DATUM.
MODIFY ITAB FROM WA INDEX 1.
7.     Accessing the table entries directly in a "LOOP ... ASSIGNING ..." accelerates the task of updating a set of lines of an internal table considerably
Modifying selected components only makes the program faster as compared to Modifying all lines completely.
e.g,
LOOP AT ITAB ASSIGNING <WA>.
I = SY-TABIX MOD 2.
IF I = 0.
    <WA>-FLAG = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above code works faster as compared to
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA.
I = SY-TABIX MOD 2.
IF I = 0.
    WA-FLAG = 'X'.
    MODIFY ITAB FROM WA.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
8.    If collect semantics is required, it is always better to use to COLLECT rather than READ BINARY and then ADD.
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA1.
READ TABLE ITAB2 INTO WA2 WITH KEY K = WA1-K BINARY SEARCH.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    ADD: WA1-VAL1 TO WA2-VAL1,
         WA1-VAL2 TO WA2-VAL2.
    MODIFY ITAB2 FROM WA2 INDEX SY-TABIX TRANSPORTING VAL1 VAL2.
ELSE.
    INSERT WA1 INTO ITAB2 INDEX SY-TABIX.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above code uses BINARY SEARCH for collect semantics. READ BINARY runs in O( log2(n) ) time. The above piece of code can be more optimized by
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
COLLECT WA INTO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
SORT ITAB2 BY K.
COLLECT, however, uses a hash algorithm and is therefore independent
of the number of entries (i.e. O(1)) .
9.    "APPEND LINES OF itab1 TO itab2" accelerates the task of appending a table to another table considerably as compared to LOOP-APPEND-ENDLOOP.
APPEND LINES OF ITAB1 TO ITAB2.
This is more optimized as compared to
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
APPEND WA TO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
10.   DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES accelerates the task of deleting duplicate entries considerably as compared to READ-LOOP-DELETE-ENDLOOP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM ITAB COMPARING K.
This is much more optimized as compared to
READ TABLE ITAB INDEX 1 INTO PREV_LINE.
LOOP AT ITAB FROM 2 INTO WA.
IF WA = PREV_LINE.
    DELETE ITAB.
ELSE.
    PREV_LINE = WA.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
11.   "DELETE itab FROM ... TO ..." accelerates the task of deleting a sequence of lines considerably as compared to DO -DELETE-ENDDO.
DELETE ITAB FROM 450 TO 550.
This is much more optimized as compared to
DO 101 TIMES.
DELETE ITAB INDEX 450.
ENDDO.
12.   Copying internal tables by using ITAB2[ ] = ITAB1[ ] as compared to LOOP-APPEND-ENDLOOP.
ITAB2[] = ITAB1[].
This is much more optimized as compared to
REFRESH ITAB2.
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
APPEND WA TO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
13.   Specify the sort key as restrictively as possible to run the program faster.
SORT ITAB BY K. makes the program runs faster as compared to SORT ITAB.
Internal Tables         contd
Hashed and Sorted tables
1.     For single read access hashed tables are more optimized as compared to sorted tables.
2.      For partial sequential access sorted tables are more optimized as compared to hashed tables
Hashed And Sorted Tables
Point # 1
Consider the following example where HTAB is a hashed table and STAB is a sorted table
DO 250 TIMES.
N = 4 * SY-INDEX.
READ TABLE HTAB INTO WA WITH TABLE KEY K = N.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
This runs faster for single read access as compared to the following same code for sorted table
DO 250 TIMES.
N = 4 * SY-INDEX.
READ TABLE STAB INTO WA WITH TABLE KEY K = N.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
Point # 2
Similarly for Partial Sequential access the STAB runs faster as compared to HTAB
LOOP AT STAB INTO WA WHERE K = SUBKEY.
ENDLOOP.
This runs faster as compared to
LOOP AT HTAB INTO WA WHERE K = SUBKEY.
ENDLOOP.

Itunes takes too much time to open and don´t recogneize my iphone

itunes takes too much time to open and don´t recogneize my iphone
I´ve alredy unistall and re install and didn´t work

5-10 minutes is normal for me when opening iTunes. But then my library is stored on network drive which slows everything down.
There has been many posts about problems with RAID and iTunes. Don't know if any of those relate.

T400 takes too much time to start or shutdown

I got a lenovo thinkpad T400, everything seems to be fine but lot of issues.
1. It takes too much time to start or shutdown (I purchased 2GB turbo memory along with the system for $50, but no use).My system is slower than 2.2 GHz(mine is 2.53GHz)
2.Fingerprint Reader: When I tried to login using my fingerprint reader it gives an error message "computer is locked only authorized user can login", when we need to type in Password every time, why Finger print reader is used ?
Connectivity: All laptops around can see all networks but not mine, my system couldn't see any networks. Why ?
4. System strucks suddenly staying irresponsible for while.!!!!!!!!!!!
When I tried to talk to CSR, they instructed to format my system using the CD's which they are going to send.When I tried to do so; an error message occurred when I inserted second CD ,that "please insert suitable/matchable(don't remember exactly) CD.
I have other question; the CD's sent by lenovo are not AUTO PLAYABLE ?

what if you press your blue thinkvantage button during startup? does it take you to the recovery partition?
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

Bought i phone 6 64 GB just 3 days before performance is very bad.Couldn't even open app store it takes too much time for opening a web page.

bought i phone 6 64 GB just 3 days before performance is very bad.Couldn't even open app store it takes too much time for opening a web page.

You may need to reset your network settings, making sure the network you're accessing is stable: tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset Network Settings.
If your iPhone still can't connect to App Store, tap Settings > iTunes & App Store > tap the Apple ID and sign out > later, sign in with your Apple ID.

PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx takes too much time

We are using an Acrobat plugin that renders the PDF file to a bitmap in memory.
We are using Acrobat Professional X. But same problems also appear on Acrobat 9.
We have received several problematic PDF files from our customers that is causing the call that renders the image -
PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx() to take unreasonably long time.
My target resolutions is 600 dpi but I couldn't wait for the call to return, after more than 6 minutes I kill the process.
The same PDFs render in Acrobat with slight delay (flickering and repainting) but in reasonable time.
I have written for this problem on previous occasions (Aug 5 2010). Since then further problematic samples
show that is linked somehow with transparency being present, but not on all PDFs with transparency.
We have a fast computer so the problem is somewhere in the PDF analysis.
Trying to optimize the file didn't help.
Checking with Preflight for PDF syntax issues also didn't find anything.

I'll have to check the headers, but I KNOW that we exposed it to plugins in A9 – it was necessary since we pulled the DrawToWindow call on the Mac (carbon vs. cocoa).
What you are asking the SDK to do is going to be painful on large complex images. Drawing into an HDC/Window adds SIGNIFICANT overhead to our rendering process, since we have to do all the work in our own "bit buffer" and then copy that buffer into the OS's provided HDC. OUCH! This is why DrawToMemory is better.
Additionally, if you have files with complex transparency AND you want OverprintPreview, that's also going to be VERY complex rendering pipeline – made WORSE by the need to end up in an HDC. Forgetting separations for the moment, consider that we have to convert everything to CMYK (since you can only compute OP in CMYK), blend colors, then convert all of that to RGB. And that's assuming SIMPLE transparency. If you have multiple blending groups, soft masks, etc. then you just raised the bar even more!
How long does it take Acrobat to open up the PDF and render it completely to screen? For separations, how long does it take to do a "Flatten Transparency" operation?
UpdateRect won't help because of the OP and then transparency flattening
From: Adobe Forums <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:45:46 -0800
To: Leonard Rosenthol <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx takes too much time
Re: PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx takes too much time
created by Nikolay Tasev<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Nikolay+Tasev> in Acrobat SDK - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4064198#4064198

UPK takes too much time "Loading Library"

Hi All, I installed the UPK Developer version 3.5.1 together with the Service Pack 3, as soon as the installation is finished:
1) Execute the UPK Developer application
2) Immediately appear a window, showing that UPK is "Loading the Library"
3) Most of the times takes too much and nothing happens, I have to kill the process.
4) Few times (I don´t know why) it stops and
4a) Let me to navigate in the menu, but most of the options are not available, I mean
I can not make a New Folder, Topic, etc, I can not Open, I can not See Options, etc
And I can not execute anything.
Does any body could help me?
During the process the only few things I was asked for were: Language, Type (I need SINGLE USER) and Windows Group, nothing related to Library configuration or something like that, any clue?
BR //
Ruben

Hello,
You can contact Oracle Support here: http://support.oracle.com/
For more information about this forum, please see the announcement at the top of the forum: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/ann.jspa?annID=1175
You shouldn't need to kill the Library loading process. Once that happened, it likely left a partial Library in your local cache. Oracle Support can assist you with this issue.
Best regards,
Marc

Finishing Backup takes too much time.

Finishing backup takes too much time in my system , sometimes 30 minutes even 1 hour! and sometimes right after finishing backup(before the icon in the menu bar stops) it starts to take another backup( and usually 10MB or something small !) or the estimation is wrong .
Sometimes I see my system that is taking backups hours and hours(just with small stops!)
and the speed rate I of data transfer is reduced, while I set it to be on maximum speed in Time Capsule.

And the log with Time-stamps from Console
4/6/09 2:31:24 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Starting standard backup
4/6/09 2:31:34 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Mounted network destination using URL: afp://[email protected]/Sina's%20Time%20Capsule
4/6/09 2:31:34 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Backup destination mounted at path: /Volumes/Sina's Time Capsule
4/6/09 2:31:39 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Disk image /Volumes/Sina's Time Capsule/Sina’s MacBook_0017f2347181.sparsebundle mounted at: /Volumes/Backup of Sina’s MacBook
4/6/09 2:31:39 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Backing up to: /Volumes/Backup of Sina’s MacBook/Backups.backupdb
4/6/09 2:39:45 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] No pre-backup thinning needed: 862.6 MB requested (including padding), 205.56 GB available
4/6/09 2:46:52 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Bulk setting Spotlight attributes failed.
4/6/09 2:48:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 2:48:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 2:48:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 2:50:06 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 2:50:06 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 2:57:21 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Bulk setting Spotlight attributes failed.
4/6/09 3:03:57 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 3:03:58 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 3:03:58 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Unable to rebuild path cache for source item. Partial source path:
4/6/09 3:12:55 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Copied 29426 files (162.6 MB) from volume Macintosh Disk.
4/6/09 3:17:36 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] No pre-backup thinning needed: 678.9 MB requested (including padding), 205.56 GB available
4/6/09 3:37:18 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Bulk setting Spotlight attributes failed.
4/6/09 3:37:57 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Copied 2362 files (100.3 MB) from volume Macintosh Disk.
4/6/09 3:42:00 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[2141] Starting post-backup thinning

Server0 process taking too much time

Hi All,
Once i start the Netweaver server, the server) process taking too much time.
When i was installed Netweaver that time 13 min, after 2 months 18 min.. then 25 min now it is taking 35 minutes.... to become green color.
Why it is taking too much time, what might be the cause.....
Give some ideas to solve this problem..............
The server0 developer trace has this information continuously 6 to 7 times...
[Thr 4204] *************** STISEND ***************
[Thr 4204] STISEND: conversation_ID: 86244265
[Thr 4204] STISEND: sending 427 bytes
[Thr 4204] STISearchConv: found conv without search
[Thr 4204] STISEND: send synchronously
[Thr 4204] STISEND GW_TOTAL_SAPSEND_HDR_LEN: 88
[Thr 4204] NiIWrite: hdl 0 sent data (wrt=515,pac=1,MESG_IO)
[Thr 4204] STIAsSendToGw: Send to Gateway o.k.
[Thr 4204] STIAsRcvFromGw: timeout value: -1
[Thr 4204] NiIRead: hdl 0 recv would block (errno=EAGAIN)
[Thr 4204] NiIRead: hdl 0 received data (rcd=3407,pac=2,MESG_IO)
[Thr 4204] STIAsRcvFromGw: Receive from Gateway o.k.
[Thr 4204] STISEND: data_received: CM_COMPLETE_DATA_RECEIVED
[Thr 4204] STISEND: received_length: 3327
[Thr 4204] STISEND: status_received: CM_SEND_RECEIVED
[Thr 4204] STISEND: request_to_send_received: CM_REQ_TO_SEND_NOT_RECEIVED
[Thr 4204] STISEND: ok
[Thr 4204] STIRCV: new buffer state = BUFFER_EMPTY
[Thr 4204] STIRCV: ok
[Thr 4204] *************** STSEND ***************
[Thr 4204] STSEND: conversation_ID: 86244265
[Thr 4204] STISearchConv: found conv without search
[Thr 4204] STSEND: new buffer state = BUFFER_DATA
[Thr 4204] STSEND: 106 bytes buffered
[Thr 4204] *************** STIRCV ***************
[Thr 4204] STIRCV: conversation_ID: 86244265
[Thr 4204] STIRCV: requested_length: 16000 bytes
[Thr 4204] STISearchConv: found conv without search
[Thr 4204] STIRCV: send 106 buffered bytes before receive
[Thr 4204] STIRCV: new buffer state = BUFFER_DATA2
[Thr 4204] *************** STISEND ***************
then
[Thr 4252] JHVM_NativeGetParam: get profile parameter DIR_PERF
[Thr 4252] JHVM_NativeGetParam: return profile parameter DIR_PERF=C:\usr\sap\PRFCLOG
this message continuously
Can i have any solution for the above problem let me know .
Thanks & regards,
Sridhar M.

Hello Manoj,
Thanks for your quick response, Previously the server has 4GB RAM and now also it has same.
Yesterday i found some more information, like deployed(through SDM) applications also take some memory at the time of starting the J2EE server...Is it right?
Any other cause...let me know
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar M.

Whay the itunes take too much ram

the itunes take too much ram in 16 gig pit windows

Well recalling an old post, is just stating the fact that the program is still doing the same thing. And i do concurr that itunes is one of my bigger ram hogs but i have no problem with 16gigs of ram installed. As coder myself, i know it is possible for them to rework itunes to dump cache periodically so that it doesnt hog as much ram as it does.
Itunes is falling behind times as Solid State Drives are becoming more prevelant in computers, they shouldn't need to cache as much as it does currently and hogging system resources. But then again on the other hand, they are probably thinking that it is not a problem anymore since the standard for most computers/laptop is upwards of 4gigs+. Still is poor coding on apple's behalf that wont be recognized this late in the game.
In reply to Zak,
As of right now apple is on downward slope according to stock market quotes. But they have a few products that are coming out here soon that will bounce them back easily. After that, I am not sure.
In reply to Richb1910,
Comparing Apple to Mircosoft now a days is like comparing apple to oranges. Their companies have taken different paths, yes one may be better then the other in their choice of paths. But as it stands microsoft is still the leading home user operating system and server operating system for many major companies. Apple excels with their product lines which make them a very successful company. To say on or the other is barely staying above water is by far the wildest thing i have ever heard.

White MacBook takes too much time to boot up

Hi there.
I got the topcase(keyboard) of my MacBook repaired. (White MacBook 2006) and after that it takes nearly 7 up to 10 seconds after pressing the power button that I first see apple logo and it boots up.
I'm not sure but seems like that detecting the hardwares take too much time .
any solution?
PS: I'm running Snow Leopard(10.6.2)

macbig wrote:
OK, 32 seconds is not good. I don't think it has anything to do with a keyboard repair. You need to try a little maintenance: Reset Pram - http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=2238
Repair Permissions - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1452
Run Disk Utility >applications>utilities>disk utilities>verify disk
How much free space do you have on your HD: Right click on HD icon and select "get info" in the drop down menu (if you don't have right click capabilities, highlight your HD icon, go file in the Apple menu, and select "get info" in the drop down menu. Let us know your results.
Yes PRAM was the the problem, I've already tried it from this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2303507&tstart=0
by the way thank you .

ICloud photos process takes too much network resources

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for