IDK automatically adding Everyone group to collab community project

Hi,
I deleted Everyone group from the community project members. I tried to read the properties of community project of collab using the IDK. What I observed is IDK call automatically adding Everyone group in the members. Can anybody tell me the reason why its happening.
Note: I am 100% sure that i am not changing any property of the community project using portal collab ui or using the IDK.

Hi Juan,
I just made a test with my Project Online instance and when I create a new user, the team member group is already selected in the user's creation interface. Thus by default, any user will be in the team member group.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

Similar Messages

Question about Everyone Group in SharePoint 2013

Hi,
I have couple of question about EVERYONE group below,
         - As per the best practice which Group we should use instead of EVERYONE group in Sharepoint ?
         - What is the difference between Everyone and All Authenticated Users Group
We have added Everyone Group in different sites, now the question is if we hide this group showing up in sharepoint people picker, is there any impact interms of current site?
         - Is there any way we can hide Everyone group showing up in the people picker only for the site / Site Collection level.
Please help.
Thanks
srabon

There is no functional difference between the Everyone group and All Authenticated Users (after Active Directory has been upgraded to Server 2003 native schema).
I'm not aware of any function to hide the group from the People Picker.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

How do I duplicate layers & groups without automatically adding a "copy", "copy 1", "copy #" at the end of the new group?

How do I duplicate layers & groups without automatically adding a "copy", "copy 1", "copy #" at the end of the new group?
It's been pestering me for quite a while now, since I often work with the same elements over and over again. Its frustrating to have to change the name of each layer manually, especially if I'm copying a whole group.
Is there a setting in Photoshop or perhaps an external script that can help fix this for me?
Cheers,
Qiming

There is no way to defeat this within the program itself. Here's the workaround:
Duplicate the file (from the Image menu).
Drag the Group or layers from the Layers list from the duplicate to the image window of the original , while holding down Shift.
That will make a "copyless" copy and reposition the copyed material in the exact same position it was on the original.

Users added to Profile Manager not showing up in everyone group

So profile manager was working quite well until I made a change to the workgroup group.
I removed the password policy from the workgroup group and added a new group for the password policy so we could essentially still manage non user assigned iOS devices.
Now when I add a new user to the workgroup group on the server I have them login to the mydevices site so we can enroll the device and they can login but are immediately presented with:
"You do not have permission to access the page you were looking for. Contact your system administrator."
In troubleshooting the issue I noticed that new users being added are not showing up the in the everyone group which is preventing the users from having proper access. Prior to all this I could add a user and they would show up in everyone as intended.
Any thoughts?

I'm not sure if this is the same issue, but I have a user in Server.app that is not showing up in Users group. She is listed in her sub-group, but I cannot add devices to her account. When I click on the arrow next to her name in the sub-group, it takes me to the Users list to the top user.
Any thoughts?

Difference between Domain\Domain Users and Everyone Group in SharePoint

Hi,
In SharePoint 2013, is Everyone Group an AD group ? Please help with details.
Thanks
srabon

Hi All,
Domain Users, Authenticated Users, or Everyone
Domain Users
The Domain Users is the only real group of the 3 listed above. By that I mean you can add and remove members from this group. Domain Users is a Global Group in the domain, and it can only contain users that are members of same domain the Domain
Users group resides in. By default all users created in the domain are automatically members of this group. However, the default Guest account in the domain is NOT a member of Domain Users, instead it is placed in the Domain Guest group.
Because Domain Users is generally considered the most secure group of the three listed above.
Authenticated Users
Authenticated Users was first introduced in Windows NT 4.0 SP3. This is a built-in group and cannot be modified. The Authenticated Users group contains users who have authenticated to the domain or a domain that is trusted by the computer domain.
Authenticated Users contains all manually created user accounts in all trusted domains regardless of whether they are a member of the Domain Users group or not. Authenticated Users specifically does not contain the built-in Guest account, but will contain
other users created and added to Domain Guests.The Authenticated Users group also includes the local computer account (computername$) and the built-in SYSTEM account.
Everyone group
The Everyone group includes all members of the Domain Users, Authenticated Users group as well as the built-in Guest account, and several other Built-in security identifiers like SERVICE, LOCAL_SERVICE, NETWORK_SERVICE, etc. NULL session connections (aka
anonymous logon) used to be included in this group but were removed in Windows 2003. This is a built-in group that cannot be modified.Because the Everyone group contains the Guest account, and several other Built-in security identifiers like SERVICE,
LOCAL_SERVICE, NETWORK_SERVICE, etc. is generally considered the least secure of the three groups.
Short Answer is there isn't much to worry about unless folks are logging I with a guest account or you have removed a bunch of folks from the domain users group
-Ivan

Adding new groups to weblogic

Is there a way of adding new groups to weblogic without using the console ? I need to add a list of group names (~100) from a flat file to weblogic. Is there a way I could automatically add those groups instead of me creating each of those groups from the console. Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks.

This is likely not the forum to get an answer to this question - check the BEA support fora.
IIRC groups are defined in weblogic.xml - unless you are talking about some other groups, in which case it depends on your authorization provider, right?
Good Luck
Lee

Everyone Group vs. Authenticated Users Group

Two questions.....
1.) What is the difference between the "Everyone" group and the "Authenticated Users" group.
2) We are starting to use some new BI content (NW04s) in our federated portal and have found that we have to grant permissions to "Authenticated Users" instead of the "Everyone" group. Any ideas why?
Regards,
Diane

Diane,
The following asnwer is not a SAP answer but I did a quick check on our system and:
1. the difference between the group Everyone and Authenticated users is exactly 1 user assignment.. I looked further and see that it has to do with the J2EE_GUEST user. this user is member of the group Everyone but NOT of the group Authenticated users.
2. Can not give you a sure anser on this question but maybe it has to do with security that this is needed?!?!\
Hopfully another SDN community member can fill me in here...
Good luck and Kind Regards,
Benjamin Houttuin

Everyone group in an alternate RDBMS Security Realm

We have implemented an alternate Oracle RDBMS security realm. The problem we have is that users added to the RDBMS realm do not show up in the console display of the Everyone group. Only users in the file realm show. Has anybody else experienced this behaviour? We have been able to confirm that users added to the RDBMS realm are indeed members of the Everyone group, they just don't show up as such in the console display.

Rick Hendricks wrote:
We have implemented an alternate Oracle RDBMS security realm. The problem we have is that users added to the RDBMS realm do not show up in the console display of the Everyone group. Only users in the file realm show. Has anybody else experienced this behaviour? We have been able to confirm that users added to the RDBMS realm are indeed members of the Everyone group, they just don't show up as such in the console display.Without looking at the code my guess would be that this is an artifact of an implementation where group "everyone" is backed by a class that always answers true to isMember() message and does not keep track of group members.
Cheers,
Alex

RDMBS - Creates two rows in table and adds to "everyone" group

I have got the RDBMSRealm (using the example code) working from a JSP and a new
user is persisted to my Oracle 8i users table. From the WLS console I can also
see this new user under my Group "Candidates". However it has also added this
user to the "everyone" group and I have two identical rows in my table. I can't
see where it picks up this "everyone" group. Any pointers would be appreciated.
Thanks.
I'm using WLS 6.1 sp2 under Windows 2K Prof.

"Roger Lee" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I have got the RDBMSRealm (using the example code) working from a JSP
and a new
user is persisted to my Oracle 8i users table. From the WLS console I
can also
see this new user under my Group "Candidates". However it has also added
this
user to the "everyone" group and I have two identical rows in my table.
I can't
see where it picks up this "everyone" group. Any pointers would be appreciated.
Thanks.
I'm using WLS 6.1 sp2 under Windows 2K Prof.

RDBMSRealm, everyone group, guest user

Hi folks, I'm having some fun with the rdbms realm lately and have a few
questions.
We're using the RDBMSRealm example with form based auth under WLS 5.1 SP 9 and
have the following in web.xml
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>All Pages</web-resource-name>
     <description>These pages are only accessible by all authorised xyz users.</description>
<url-pattern>*</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<description>These are the roles that have access</description>
<role-name>
xyz
</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<security-role>
<description>All application users</description>
<role-name>
xyz
</role-name>
</security-role>
which basically says that every page in the web-app requires a user to be in the
xyz role and does seem to work fine.
Now, what I'd like to do is to allow everyone to access one particular page
within the application (that is, this page does not require the xyz role). So
something like the following would be great.
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>Some Particular Page</web-resource-name>
     <description>This page is accessible to everyeone.</description>
<url-pattern>/particular/page.jsp</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<description>everyone can get at this page.</description>
<role-name>everyone</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
However, this doesn't seem to work, I get redirected to the form based login
page and once I've logged in can get to the page that I'm hoping shouldn't
require a logged in user.
So I'm wondering about the xml syntax and semantics.
- What are the rules around specific and general mappings, like will a
more specific mapping be used before falling back to the general mapping?
- Are the mappings applied in order (first to last) and the first match
taken?
- Are the rules according to section 10 of the servlet spec applicable here?
Now my problem might also be the RDBMSRealm its self -- I'm also having some
problems with the everyone group and the guest user. If I remove the first
constraint above and only include the /particular/page.jsp constraint to the
everyone group things still don't seem to work right.
I can see the realm call getGroup("everyone") and getUser("guest) but both
calls return null, since these principals are not in our database
tables. However, if I hit http://localhost:7001/AdminRealm I do see a list of
all groups that our RDBMSRealm knows about and I also see the everyone group
which contains system and guest users and so I have more questions.
- Does CachingRealm fall back to the standard properties realm if it gets nulls
from the RDBMSDelegate?
- Does the everyone group include unauthenticated users (i.e. guest) as I'm
hoping?
I've tried adding an instance of weblogic.security.acl.Everyone to my
RDBMSDelegate class and checking if the call to getGroup is looking for
"everyone" in which case I return this instance but this doesn't seem to do
anything either. I also tried adding this everyone group to the list returned
by getGroups but that didn't help and I carried the idea through to getUser and
getUsers with a guest user but again no luck. I'm always forced to authenticate
before I can get to the page that should allow anyone (everyone) to see it.
Any help, ideas, advice, beer, etc. would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
Derek

THorner <[email protected]> writes:
RDBMSRealm, everyone group, guest user
Update-I've got it working.
AS well as the isMember change mentioned below I altered getPrincipal
for both the RDBMSRealm class
if(name.equals("guest")){return createUser("guest","guest");}
if(name.equals("everyone")){return new Everyone(this);}
and RDBMSDelegate
if(name.equals("guest")){return realm.createUser("guest","guest");}
if(name.equals("everyone")){return new
weblogic.security.acl.Everyone(realm);}
did something to RDBMSUser so that guest always authenticates
(alternatively you could put the guest user on the database, surely?)I did see various examples of the guest and everyone additions to the realm
code, but I also read some stuff that indicated that if the rdbms realm returns
null for these requests then the caching realm should fall back to the standard
properties realm which does have the guest user and everyone group defined.
With the debugging turned on this does seem to be what it does and the
guest/everyone code doesn't seem to be needed. I also checked the
http://localhost:7001/AdminRealm servlet and did see the everyone group with
system and guest users as part of it.
>
Allow guest access to the file servlet (otherwise they can't be sent any
HTML pages - my best guess would be that this is your problem).This was probably part of the problem, judging by the messages from the realm
debugging.
Also I altered weblogicURL.policy to allow 'everyone' access to the page
that was to be unrestricted - so I guess you should set
I hope this helps, if not (and you haven't already) turn on RDBMSRealm
debugging - eventually I found the information useful (in that it tends
to tell you what it has last been looking for, and the methods used)In the end, I found that specifying that the everyone group is required for a
particular resource didn't seem to work. Instead I protected the majority of my
application with a set of rules and left all other pages without any matching
rules and the guest user then seems to work ok.
The servlet 2.3 spec has an addition to the <role-name> tag which allows a * to
indicate all roles but this isn't in the 2.2 spec.
Thanks for the help!
Cheers,
Derek
>
terry
-----Original Message-----
From: THorner
I am working on something similar (although not in a war),
which isn't working yet, but I can tell you a couple of
things that I have come across.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Derek
Scherger
Posted At: Mon 04 June 2001 22:13
Posted To: weblogic.developer.interest.security
Conversation: RDBMSRealm, everyone group, guest user
Subject: RDBMSRealm, everyone group, guest user
Hi folks, I'm having some fun with the rdbms realm lately and
have a few
questions.
We're using the RDBMSRealm example with form based auth under
WLS 5.1 SP 9 and
have the following in web.xml
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>All Pages</web-resource-name>
     <description>These pages are only accessible by all
authorised xyz users.</description>
<url-pattern>*</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<description>These are the roles that have
access</description>
<role-name>
xyz
</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<security-role>
<description>All application users</description>
<role-name>
xyz
</role-name>
</security-role>
which basically says that every page in the web-app requires
a user to be in the
xyz role and does seem to work fine.
Now, what I'd like to do is to allow everyone to access one
particular page
within the application (that is, this page does not require
the xyz role). So
something like the following would be great.
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>Some Particular Page</web-resource-name>
     <description>This page is accessible to
everyeone.</description>
<url-pattern>/particular/page.jsp</url-pattern>
</web-resource-collection>
<auth-constraint>
<description>everyone can get at this page.</description>
<role-name>everyone</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
However, this doesn't seem to work, I get redirected to the
form based login
page and once I've logged in can get to the page that I'm
hoping shouldn't
require a logged in user.
So I'm wondering about the xml syntax and semantics.
- What are the rules around specific and general mappings, like will a
more specific mapping be used before falling back to the
general mapping?
- Are the mappings applied in order (first to last) and the
first match
taken?
- Are the rules according to section 10 of the servlet spec
applicable here?
Now my problem might also be the RDBMSRealm its self -- I'm
also having some
problems with the everyone group and the guest user. If I
remove the first
constraint above and only include the /particular/page.jsp
constraint to the
everyone group things still don't seem to work right.
I can see the realm call getGroup("everyone") and
getUser("guest) but both
calls return null, since these principals are not in our database
tables. However, if I hit http://localhost:7001/AdminRealm I
do see a list of
all groups that our RDBMSRealm knows about and I also see the
everyone group
which contains system and guest users and so I have more questions.
- Does CachingRealm fall back to the standard properties
realm if it gets nulls
from the RDBMSDelegate?
- Does the everyone group include unauthenticated users (i.e.
guest) as I'm
hoping?
I've tried adding an instance of weblogic.security.acl.Everyone to my
RDBMSDelegate class and checking if the call to getGroup is
looking for
"everyone" in which case I return this instance but this
doesn't seem to do
anything either. I also tried adding this everyone group to
the list returned
by getGroups but that didn't help and I carried the idea
through to getUser and
getUsers with a guest user but again no luck. I'm always
forced to authenticate
before I can get to the page that should allow anyone
(everyone) to see it.
Any help, ideas, advice, beer, etc. would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
Derek

Everyone group

Hi,
I'm implementing a custom RDBMS realm (based on the one in the examples) and
am getting into a bit of bother with users not being added to group everyone
according to the administration console. Can anyone point me to more
information/documentation on this or know what I need to do to ensure this?
Thanks
Sioux

Sioux,
I am using exactly that technique in my hacked version of RDBMS Realm! I
was happy to see you post because it means I'm not the only one who found
the need to handle this case.
I too hope that it is a valid technique and look forward to some other
responses.
I didn't need to do anything special in isMember().
John
Sioux France <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a9689f5$[email protected]..
What I've used is a change to the RDBMSDelegate which contains a Group
everyone as a member variable:
// where realm inherits from ListableRealm.
Group m_everyone = new weblogic.security.acl.Everyone(realm);
public Group getGroup(String name)
throws SQLException
if (name.equals("everyone"))
return m_everyone;
// usual code
So this way I actually hold a group 'everyone' containing my realm.
Does this seem reasonable? And do you think I should put some on the
isMember checking in as well?
Thanks
Sioux
One way around it is to have the isMember method in RDBMSGroup dosomething
like this.
public boolean isMember(Principal member){
if (this.getName().equals("everyone")){
return true;
}else if(member.getName().equals("everyone")){
return false;
}else{
[do the normal checking]

I have all my music on my external hard drive when I try to add it to iTunes it is automatically added to my MacBook Pro's hard drive. How do I stop this from happening? I just want the music to stay on the external hard drive. Thanks!

I have all my music on my external hard drive when I try to add it to iTunes it is automatically added to my MacBook Pro's hard drive. How do I stop this from happening? I just want the music to stay on the external hard drive. Thanks!

This is true of course, but doesn't cover the situation where some files are in the iTunes Media folder and others are on an external drive. In my case I keep my music in the Media folder and all my films on an external drive (there are too many to have on the internal drive). In iTunes 11, and before, it was easy to add those external files by holding down the alt/opt key while dragging to the sidebar. In iTunes 12 this is no longer possible. There are several workarounds: use TuneSpan to move the file after it's been added; delete the file from the Media folder and empty the trash then use iTunes Get Info which will report the file is missing and allow you to locate it; constantly switch the Add to iTunes toggle on and off as required. All of these require a lot more work than just holding down the alt/opt key while adding.
It constantly gets harder.

I don't accept cookies except from "Exception" domains. However, it seems that any site that want to set a cookie is automatically added to my list of "Exceptions". Why is this?

I have "Accept cookies from sites" unchecked. I have a list of exceptions for domains that I allow to set cookies. However, it seems some site not on my exception list are automatically added to my list when they want to set cookies.
Why/how is this happening?

Hello cor-el, thanks for your reply. I changed my settings for downloads to desktop and it has appeared on there. When I double click I am asked which program I want to open file. I click firefox and another box "opening install" says I have chosen to open the file which is an application and do I want to save it. This is the only real option so I press save file. I get a box saying this is an executable file which may contain viruses - do you want to run. I press ok and the final box showing C drive file name and desktop appears stating application not found.
This happens the same whenever I try to install.
To my untrained eye the application is not being recognised as an application and I cannot work out how to get it to do that.
My plugin is still showing as out of date.
Is there anything you could suggest. Thanks for your time.

Automatic assignment responsible group partner function of Activities

Hi,
I need help on below requirement>>
Automatic assignment responsible group partner function of Activities when status is set to u201CIncorrectly Assignedu201D.
Thanks

you can check with order status badi
BR
Radek

How do I stop itunes from automatically adding songs into my itunes library?

I want to disable itunes from automatically adding songs into my library. Every time I sync up my ipod I'm finding miscellaneous debris on it that itunes keeps importing into it. Theres got to be a way to disable this function but I can't seem to find it in the preferences. I'm using a 2011 macbook pro with os x 10.6.7.

I figured out how to change itunes as my default player. I did this by selecting a new audio file and hitting cmd and I to get info, then I selected the "open with" category. Inside "open with" theres an option to open the file with quick time, underneath that is the "change all" option. select that and you will solve this problem if this is a nuisance to anyone else.

IDK automatically adding Everyone group to collab community project

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for