IDOC_ADAPTER.ATTRIBUTE_BE_NOT_SUPP Only asynchronous processing supported

Hello Expert,
Error while send IDOC
" IDOC_ADAPTER.ATTRIBUTE_BE_NOT_SUPP Only asynchronous processing
supported for IDOC Adapter" is returned.
Please suggest
Thulasi

Hi,
Make sure that you have mentioned the Recever message interface as Async mode
Here it is saying that IDOC suports only Async that means some where else u have mentioned as Sync interface
Regards
Seshagiri

Similar Messages

  • Asynchronous processing support

    I can't find anything about asynchronous processing in the documentation for ODP.NET, am I missing something, or is this a future enhancement?
    OO4O documentation extract.
    ===========================
    Non-Blocking Mode
    In non-blocking mode, control is returned to the application immediately even if the execution is not complete. This allows the application to execute other tasks which are not dependent on the results of the last execution.

    Async command execution in ADO.NET are slated for version 2 of the .net framework.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html/async2.asp
    Support in ODP.NET would have to follow that.
    For many senarios you can use .NET threading to run commands on background threads. You just can't share an OracleConnection between threads.
    David

  • Handling Faults in asynchronous process SOA11G

    I could implement RuntimeFault.wsdl in synchronous process, but I cannot to do the smae in asynchronous process.
    What is the difference in implementing it.
    I want to handle wsdl (partner link) fault in during invoke activity. But when I add this
    <wsdl:fault name="ImportOrderStatusFault" message="ns1:RuntimeFaultMessage"/>
    in my bpel process wsdl I get error, wsdl not expected.
    Also, when I use bpel:remoteFault, bpel:bindingFault or catchAll ,and use reply activity to client, I get error in reply activity.
    Also, in asynchronous process, i cannot use throw activity. Now, if source system invokes my bpel asynchronous process, and there is WSDL Fault in Partner Link. Would source know that there is an exception ?
    Thanks

    in your async process you have something like
        <portType name="getEmployee">
            <operation name="initiate">
                <input message="client:EmployeeRequestMessage"/>
            </operation>
        </portType>
        <portType name="getEmployeeCallback">
            <operation name="onResult">
                <input message="client:EmployeeResponseMessage"/>
            </operation>
           <operation name="onError">
             <input message="client:yourErrorMessage"/>
           </operation>
        </portType>in your bpel you catch the error and in the catch handler you do the invoke back just like you do the callback in your normal flow, only this time you call onError instead of onResult
    Or if you don't want the use a seperate callback (onError) you could still use the onResult in the catch handler, but before the invoke you need to construct the message you want to reply and assign that to lets say the outputVariable (if this is the one used by the callback in the error catch handler)

  • Synchronous to Asynchronous Process

    We need some desing help. We need a Synchronous(webService) to Asynchronous(Idoc to SAP) process, but not have the Synchronous thread wait for the Asynchronous process to complete. The Synchronous process needs to hand off the message to a Asynchronous process and immediately response back to the Synchronous client. The Synchronous reply is basically an acknowledgment.
    Appreciate can anyone have design idea?

    Hi,
    if you only want to close the sync step from the webservice call there is a simple idea that could help.
    When receiving the webservice call add a transformation step in the BPM (in the sync-async bridge BPM as second step). In this step add a mapping from the webservice outbound message to the response. Fill in whatever you need, e.g. constants. If I understand right, you only want to close the sync call.
    >With the mapping in the transform step you will fill a container element for the response which you can use in the close s/a bridge step to send the response.
    Regards
    Dirk

  • Asynchronous process learnings: Why are callbacks skipped?

    Just wanted to log my learnings about asynchronous processes and callbacks.
    I was trying to write a .NET client to invoke an asynchronous process and was not getting anywhere. The process was being invoked successfully but the callback wasn't happening. The visual flow in the console kept saying "skipped callback x on partner y". It appears this happens when the process does not recognize that the incoming invocation is conversational - in other words it does not find the WS-Addressing headers or if present does not understand it. You would notice the same behaviour when you invoke an asynchronous process from the console. This is expected behaviour because the console does not expose a callback.
    So, if you are trying to invoke an asynchronous process from another platform and see the "skipped callback" message, the first place to check is your WS-Addressing headers. Is it present and specified properly? Is the WS-Addressing namespace correct? On the BPEL 2.0.11 version I was testing, newer WS-Addressing versions would not work. I had to switch back to the older "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/addressing" version. Another strange problem I noticed was that it was expecting some bpel attributes such as rootID, parentID in the MessageID header. Without these it would throw a server fault.
    It also helps to write a sample client process in BPEL to invoke the asynchronous process and log the request and callback messages (there are technotes on OTN that show how to do this). This can be compared with the messages produced by your client to debug any problems.
    Hope this information is useful for interested people. I'm yet to test the behaviour on the 10g version. Will keep this thread updated when I do that.

    The migration utility only processes transforms that are created by the user.  If a transform was part of the Data Quality installation, it will not be migrated because the equivalent transform will be installed as part of the Data Services installation. 
    Please read the manual "DS Migration Considerations > Data Quality to Data Services Migration > How transforms migrate" for more details.
    Regards,
    George
    Edited by: George Ruan on Nov 22, 2011 9:04 PM

  • Hi ive upgraded my itouch to ios 6.1.3 but it keeps crashing ounce i put my passcode in is there a way i can fix this? one of my  friends mentioed downgrading it but the only way isnt supported by apple so i dont feel safe with it so plzz help me

    hi ive upgraded my itouch to ios 6.1.3 but it keeps crashing ounce i put my passcode in is there a way i can fix this? one of my  friends mentioed downgrading it but the only way isnt supported by apple so i dont feel safe with it so plzz help me.
    it has worked fine no problems till i updated it i tried restoring itwith my old backup but it doesnt move the ios back so it just keeps on craching when i try to unlock it

    Try:
    - Reset the iOS device. Nothing will be lost
    Reset iOS device: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - Restore from backup. See:                                 
    iOS: How to back up           
    - Restore to factory settings/new iOS device.
    If still problem, make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store since it appears you have a hardware problem.
    Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar          
    Downgrading the iOS is not supported by Apple

  • Row based Target only mode not supported

    when i try to execute a mapping i am getting the following error
    Row based Target only mode not supported
    what can be the reasons for this

    Hello Michael
    Check if you have a procedure (other than pre or post mapping) in your mapping. Every part of a mapping after a procedure can only be generated in row-based mode.
    Hope this helps
    Mate

  • Fault in initializing asynchronous process

    Hi Guys,
    As many posts and articles suggest, asynchronous process is better because of its flexibility. I am very happy with it until I encounter the following problem.
    We do the fault handling on all of our processes, using both the catch and fault policy framework. For asynchronous process, we use a separate invoke to return the fault. Recently, we noticed a problem. For some reasons, every Sunday when the production BPEL server restarts, there are always a few BPEL process turned retired and off. We've already raised a service request for this on metalink. But this causes another very serious issue:
    The calling BPEL instance sends a request to initiate the asynchronous process . As it is turned off and retired by accident, the initialization fails. However, as it's asynchronous, the calling process is not notified, which means there is no fault raised on the calling process. This causes a lot of trouble because we are not notified with the problem. This has never been a problem because we did not have process turned off and retired before.
    This can be easily verified by a simple test case. Create a synchronous process A and an asynchronous process B. Let A invoke B. Then turn off and retire B. A instance can still be executed successfully without saying the problem calling B. If B is a synchronous process, A will always report a fault in such situation.
    Of course, the domain log file records this ORABPEL-02106 problem. but we don't want to check log file all the time and want to be notified when it happens. Is there a way to catch such exception/fault in the calling process?
    Thanks in advance!!!
    Steven
    Edited by: sw12345 on Jul 26, 2010 9:41 AM

    HI Sridhar,
    Thanks for you advice. I think I will do the following:
    1. I will still keep all process as asynchronous with the deliveryPersistPolicy as default.
    2. I will add a cron job to scan the server whenever it restarts to detect any default version of BPEL process with a retire or off status. If there are, I'll correct them.
    3. I will implement the program to re-submit the failed invoke. But I cannot make it an alert program because I cannot get detail fault through IInvokeHandle (Please correct me if I am wrong).
    By the way the defect of the "ClassCastException" is fixed in 10.1.3.5, I guess that can upgrade that too :-)
    Thanks,
    Steven

  • Fault Handling in Asynchronous process

    Hi,
    I want to know how to throw fault from an Asynchronous process to the calling process. In a synchronous process we generally throw faults using fault message in 'process' port type. But Im not sure how to throw a fault from Asynchrnous process to the calling process that can be caught in the catch block of the calling process.
    Can some one update me with the feasibility of this.
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Look inside the Oracle® BPEL Process Manager Developer's Guide at http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31017_01/integrate.1013/b28981/faults.htm#BABIBAFC
    8.8.2 Returning a Fault in an Asynchronous Interaction
    In an asynchronous interaction, the client does not wait for a reply. The reply activity is not used to return a fault. Instead, the BPEL process returns a fault using a callback operation on the same port type that normally receives the requested information, with an invoke activity.
    Example
        <portType name="BPELFaultHandling">
            <operation name="initiate">
                <input message="client:BPELFaultHandlingRequestMessage"/>
            </operation>
        </portType>
        <portType name="BPELFaultHandlingCallback">
            <operation name="onResult">
                <input message="client:BPELFaultHandlingResponseMessage"/>
            </operation>
            <operation name="onError">
                <input message="client:BPELFaultHandlingErrorMessage"/>
            </operation>
        </portType>On the caller side you have to use one invoke followed by a pick activity waiting for onResult or onError callback.
    Best Regards,
    Harald Reinmueller

  • How to invoke an other BPM asynchronous process from the BPM process

    Do anyone know how to invoke other asynchronous process from the BPM process without using the Web Service URL?

    Try using a Service task implemented as a Process Call. Then you select the process you want to call, set the associations or transformation and deploy it to test.
    I hope it works for you.
    isabelbernely

  • When I open iMovie, it says that quick time componets are missing, "Please re-install"...When I do that it says that ONLY 9 is supported and I have to have that first. What gives with that?

    When I open iMovie, it says that quick time componets are missing, "Please re-install"...When I do that it says that ONLY 9 is supported and I have to have that first. What gives with that?

    What version of iPhoto are you using?
    This is the the first time I have ever launched it.
    Does that mean there are no photos in the library? If so move it to the Trash bin in the Dock and launch iPhoto again.
    If there are photos in the library do the following:
    Using iPhoto Library Manager  to Rebuild Your iPhoto Library
    Download iPhoto Library Manager and launch.
    Click on the Add Library button,                         
    and select the library you want to add from those in the selection window.
    Now that the library is listed in the left hand pane of iPLM, click on your library and go to the Library ➙ Rebuild Library menu option
    In the next  window name the new library and select the location you want it to be placed.
    Click on the Create button.
    Note 1: This creates a new library based on the LIbraryData.xml file in the library and will recover Events, Albums, keywords, titles and comments. However, books, calendars, cards and slideshows will be lost.
    Note 2:  Your current library will be left untouched for further attempts at a fix if so desired.
    OT

  • Re : what is diffrent Between  Synchronies and   Asynchronies  process

    Hi ,
          what is diffrent between Synchronies and   Asynchronies  process in  session Method and call Transcation method  pls give one Example...
    Thanks
    Arief .S

    Synchronus data processing is that in which the program calling the update task waits for the update work process to finish the update before it continues processing.
    In Asynchronus update the callng program does not wait for update work process to finish the update and continues as normal.
    A BDC done with sessions is always synchronus.
    A BDC with call transaction is by default asynchronus
    unless you define it explicitly as
    call transaction 'XXXX' ...... update 'S'.
    ( If you donot define update option it is defaulted to "A" ).
    The update method is of importance when one transaction locks data which may be required by a subsequent transaction . The subsequent transaction will fail if data is locked from previous one. An example would be you are creating sales order for same material in succession ( with asynchronus update ). Quite likely that some of transactions would fail due to material locked.
    For large volume of data Call Transaction will be faster but you have no restart capability here. Suppose from 1000 transactions 100 fails . You will have to run the BDC program again exclusing the ones which wrere successful. However with session method you have the option to process the error transactions again in SM35 . So if you are sure that errors will not occur use call transaction else use session method.

  • Several Onmessage and asynchronous process doesn't function

    Hi,
    I'm using the BPM suite v10.1.2.0.2.
    A process instantiated by a pick with two onMessage, each receiving a distinct message from two different invoke from another process, doesn't function.
    I have the following error :
    <remoteFault>
    <part name="summary" >
    <summary>when invoking endpointAddress 'http://set.by.caller', exception during AXIS invoke: java.net.UnknownHostException: set.by.caller; nested exception is: javax.xml.rpc.JAXRPCException: java.net.UnknownHostException: set.by.caller</summary>
    </part>
    <part name="detail" >
    <detail>javax.xml.rpc.JAXRPCException: java.net.UnknownHostException: set.by.caller</detail>
    </part>
    </remoteFault>
    More clearly, when I Introspect the data entries to instantiate only the process beginning with the pick, It works with one operation, but not for the other.
    I can see that the error is the following : the server always looks after the same portType, and therefore generates the following error : operation cannot be found in the portType.
    I assume the code is correct describing the two operations.
    Has anyone already faced such a bug ?
    Thank you by advance,
    mlamarque

    Hi,
    I've been working on it these past days. I Never found the problem.
    You can find here the useful bpel code :
    <partnerLink myRole="BPELProcess1Provider" name="PartnerLink_1" partnerLinkType="client:BPELProcess1"/>
    <partnerLink myRole="BPELProcess1Provider2" name="PartnerLink_2" partnerLinkType="client:BPELProcess2"/>
    <variable name="variable1" messageType="client:BPELProcess1RequestMessage"/>
    <variable name="variable2" messageType="client:BPELProcess1RequestMessage2"/>
    <pick name="Pick_1" createInstance="yes">
    <onMessage portType="client:BPELProcess11" operation="initiate1" variable="variable1" partnerLink="PartnerLink_1">
    <wait name="Wait_1" for="'PT5S'"/>
    </onMessage>
    <onMessage portType="client:BPELProcess12" operation="initiate2" variable="variable2" partnerLink="PartnerLink_2">
    <wait name="Wait_2" for="'PT5S'"/>
    </onMessage>
    </pick>
    and here is the WSDL code :
    <portType name="BPELProcess11">
    <operation name="initiate1">
    <input message="client:BPELProcess1RequestMessage"/>
    </operation>
    </portType>
    <portType name="BPELProcess12">
    <operation name="initiate2">
    <input message="client:BPELProcess1RequestMessage2"/>
    </operation>
    </portType>
    <plnk:partnerLinkType name="BPELProcess1">
         <plnk:role name="BPELProcess1Provider">
              <plnk:portType name="client:BPELProcess11"/>
         </plnk:role>
    </plnk:partnerLinkType>
    <plnk:partnerLinkType name="BPELProcess2">
         <plnk:role name="BPELProcess1Provider2">
              <plnk:portType name="client:BPELProcess12"/>
         </plnk:role>
    </plnk:partnerLinkType>
    If I Try to introspect the call of 'intiate1' with a HTML form on the BPM server, I get the following error message :
    Unfound operation in the portType. The operation "initiate1" cannot be found in the portType "{http://xmlns.oracle.com/BPELProcess1}BPELProcess12". Check if the "initiate1" operation exists.
    The other branch is working fine.
    I can't help thinking that this is an Oracle Bug : the server always looks after the same branch.
    Anyway, thank you by advance
    Mathieu Lamarque

  • Asynchronous processing options.

    On a CF9 system which of the various Asynchronous options would the group-think consider the easiest and best to implement for the following purpose.
    I have a file on one server that does some initial processing.  When done sucessfully it posts a received file to another server.  I want it to NOT wait for a response from that server.  Rather I just want the request to finish and return an initial response to the client that contacted the first server.
    Here is the code where The file is posted to an internal server.
    <cftry>
         <!--- Submit POST request to the internal server with to deliver the XML file --->
         <cfhttp url="http://#application.internalServer#/pur-loader/ws/ppur_int_v0.cfc" method="post" multipart="yes" timeout="0">
              <cfhttpparam name="incomingFile" type="file" file="#cffile.serverDirectory & '/' & cffile.serverFile#">
              <cfhttpparam name="method" type="url" value="receiveData">
         </cfhttp>
         <cfcatch type="any">
              <cflog application="yes" file="PPUR" type="error" text="HTTP Request to the Internal Web service failed.">
              <cfrethrow>
         </cfcatch>
    </cftry>
    I thought the timeout=0 was a very old method to generate an Asynchronous process.  But, apparently I am wrong or this is no longer true.  As this code does not work.  The <cfhttp...> tag is waiting for a response and is timing out from the request time out not the http timeout, do to the interal process is going to take serverl minutes or more.
    Would a <cfthread...> work well here?  My concern in the number of threads that can be spawned.  The initial template may be accessed upwards of 60 times in a relatively short time.  Would creating 60ish long running threads with the <cfthread...> be of concern?
    Would a gateway improve that situation in any way?
    Are there other Asynchronous options I am overlooking?

    your problem could be timeout="0"...i dont think it is a good idea to use zero...and <cfhttpparam is missing some pounds around variables...

  • Couldn't get Asynchronous process instance

    Hi,
    i am calling one Asynchronouse process from my queue listener process. The listener is calling the asynchronous process.But could see Async process instance in the instanceses tab of BPELConsole.
    can any one please help me in this ...
    when i invoked the Asynch process directly some times got invoked and could see the flow. But some times getting tryAgain link.. while trying again getting the same page again and again.
    what is the reasone where am not correct in asynch process ?
    Regards,
    Bogi.

    Did you set the loglevel to debug and verified the logfile?

Maybe you are looking for