Idoc basic type PEXR2003
Hi all,
can any one take me the structure of Idoc Basic type PEXR2003.
WE60 ==> Basic Type checked ==> enter PEXR2003 ==> F9 key
Thanks in advance
Ragerds
Mercuryx
Up,
No ideas??????
Similar Messages
-
How to change the default IDOC basic type from CREMAS05 to CREMAS04.
Hi All,
How to change the default IDOC basic type from CREMAS05 to CREMAS04 when sending Vendor Master Data.
When I generate partner profile, the system will add the latest version of IDOC type which is CREMAS05 to the Outbound message. In my project, I'm asked to use CREMAS04.
I want to use BD14 to send master data directly, but the program will generate IDOC using CREMAS05. Is there a way that I can change it to CREMAS04? And also for using Change Pointers, I want to use the report RBDMIDOC, but i have the same problem.
Thanks
Sai Krishnaexecute WE20 and edit the outbound parameters
here is a pretty good example: http://documentation.softwareag.com/webmethods/sapr3_gateway/sap231/pages/sapdist.htm
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Sep 7, 2011 9:49 PM -
Inbound IDOC basic type HRMD_A07: Why no validation available?
I am using a standard inbound IDOC basic type HRMD_A07 to update employee master data (IT0000 & IT0001). However, i found out that this IDOC just directly updates to the infotypes without any validation. For example, i provide an invalid company code (BUKRS) and personnel area (WERKS), the IDOC still updates into database without any proper validation.
Filled the following fields in the IDOC segments:
E1PLOGI
plvar=01, otype=P, objid=00000001, opera=I
E1PITYP
plvar=01, otype=P, objid=00000001, infty=0000, begda=20120101, endda=99991231
E1P0000
pernr=00000001, infty=0000, endda=99991231, begda=20120101, massn=01, massg=01, stat1=3, stat2=3
E1PITYP
plvar=01, otype=P, objid=00000001, infty=0001, begda=20120101, endda=99991231
E1P0001
pernr=00000001, infty=0001, endda=99991231, begda=20120101, bukrs=XXXX, werks=XXXX, persg=1, persk=EC, abkrs=99, plans=00000111, otype=S
Please help me out in case I am missing something. Thanks.Additional Info:
In WE21 at the TRFC Port, it is possible to set this Option:
Send Only Fields of Selected Segment Version
The segment data of the IDoc is passed to this port with the length matching the segment definition of the release specified in the partner profile.
But if we are using an reduced message type, all fields of the newest release are in the segement.
The docu tells that this will be done in function EDI_DOCUMENT_OPEN_FOR_CREATE.
But it is never called when createing an material IDOC with BD10.
Bug or feature?
Kind regards
Manuel -
Status 51 in IDOC Basic type: ORDERS05
Hi,
When Inbound IDOCs of IDOC basic type : ORDERS05 are processed in bulk then few of the IDOCs go to status 51 with error message : "Sales organisation, Distribution channel and division cannot be determined for the customer (followed by customer number)". But when these failed IDOCs are processed again using BD87 few more IDOCs go to status 53. Similarly if the failed IDOCs are reprocessed for 4/5 times without changing any data in the IDOC then all the IDOCs go to status 53.
When I try to create a duplicate IDOC using WE19 then the IDOC goes directly to status 53. So if processed in bulk then few IDOCs go to status 51 and when processed one by one the IDOCs go to status 53 without any problem. Can someone tell me what is the reason behind it and what has to be done to avoid the continuous reprocessing of IDOC.Hi,
When Inbound IDOCs of IDOC basic type : ORDERS05 are processed in bulk then few of the IDOCs go to status 51 with error message : "Sales organisation, Distribution channel and division cannot be determined for the customer (followed by customer number)". But when these failed IDOCs are processed again using BD87 few more IDOCs go to status 53. Similarly if the failed IDOCs are reprocessed for 4/5 times without changing any data in the IDOC then all the IDOCs go to status 53.
When I try to create a duplicate IDOC using WE19 then the IDOC goes directly to status 53. So if processed in bulk then few IDOCs go to status 51 and when processed one by one the IDOCs go to status 53 without any problem. Can someone tell me what is the reason behind it and what has to be done to avoid the continuous reprocessing of IDOC. -
F110S - debugging - Idoc basic type PEXR2002
Hi,
i'm trying to debug F110S and its not stopping in FEDI0003 routines. am i missing something.
i have to populate bank details in this Idoc (basic type pexr2002 and message type PAYEXT)
please let me know.
Thanks.
Edited by: vij k on Aug 5, 2009 9:51 PMfigured it out. Thanks.
-
Processing IDOC Basic type ORDERS05 in CRM...
I'm processing (via WE19) an IDOC (Basic type ORDERS05) to create a Sales order withing CRM. I'm getting there in that a sales order is being raised, although there is no item level details so far. I know that config of the system plays a big hand in what fields within the IDOC need to be populated but has anyone actually posted/raised a Sales order in this way and can you tell me what fields within the IDOC are mandatory. Or perhaps suggest how I might derive this.
Ideally I wanted to extract a sales order and produce an outbound IDOC and then compare the contents, but I can't (don't know how) do this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.Hi Garry,
Here is an order from WE19, which works
E1EDK01
ACTION: [QUAL] - suggesting 000 - no changes
E1EDK14
QUALF: [QUAL] - suggesting 008 - sales org
ORGID: [ORGANIZATION] - anything you have defined /your side/
E1EDK03
IDDAT: [QUAL] - suggesting 002 - delivery date
DATUM: [DATE] - any date
E1EDKA1
PARVW: [QUAL] - may use AG as 'sold to' here
PARTN: [PARTNER#] - any partner defined
E1EDKA1 - not necessary
PARVW: [QUAL] - may have different 'sold to' and 'ship to' or 'bill to'
PARTN: [PARTNER#]
E1EDP01
POSEX [ITEM#] - for example '1'
MENEE [Unit of measure] - PCE for peaces
E1EDP02
QUALF: [QUAL] - suggesting 001 - customer order
BELNR: [document number] - document #. any
E1EDP20
WMENG: [Scheduled quantity] - any - quantity
EDATU: [Date] - any - when to deliver
E1EDP19
QUALF: [QUAL] - for example 001 - used by customer, 004 - used by manufactured
IDTNR: [material ID] - material ID
E1EDS01
SUMME: [Total value of sum segment] - check for the number of lines in PO1.
Hope this helps and do not forget to allot points.
Regards,
Martin -
Release? while assigning Z Message Type to a Standard SAP IDOC Basic type
Hi Experts,
Am trying to assign a custom Message Type to a Standard SAP IDOC Basic type in WE82 transaction, but am not sure How to find the Release(last column of WE82 Tx)? Pls. let me know.
Thank youHello,
In case of IDOC, Go to Transaction WE30, type your IDOC name & select basic type & extension.
After that select Go to -> Header data (Shift+F7), you will Idoc header info. In the same pop-up you will find IDOC release for which version.
Regards,
Sameer -
How can I delete the IDOC basic type and extension?
Hi,Expert:
There are some idoc basic types and extension which are not used any more in our system.Now we want to delete them.but when I delete them using tcode:WE30, system said that the basic type or extension has been released and they can not be deleted.
How should we do to delete these idoc types?
ThanksFrom the top menu > edit> cancel release then try to delete
a®s -
What is the IDOC Basic Type for sales order creation
Hi Experts,
Can anyone tell me Idoc Basic type for sales order creation.
Thanks
PrashantHi,
The basic types for creating the order are:
1.Orders01
2.Orders02
3.Orders03
4.Orders04
5.Orders05.
The basic type for SIS order is:
SISCSO01.
Regards,
Krishna. -
IDOC Segement Release vs IDOC Basic Type
Hi there,
we are in an upgrade project and are runing into a general question about idoc creation.
Here is our behavior:
1. We have an reduced IDOC Type in BD53 ZMATMAS based on Messagetype MATMASDI.
2. It has 2 Segements E1MARAM with fields MSGFN MATNR PSTAT and Subsegemnt E1MAKTM with fields MSGFN SPRAS MAKTX.
3. Done the things around (RFC, Partner Profile, distribution model, changepointer ..)
4. In Distribution Model in outbound parameters, added our ZMATMAS.
As parameters we have: Partner type: LS, Message Type: ZMATMAS, Basic Type MATMAS03! and Seg. release in IDOC Type 46B. The Partnersystem is an NoneSAP System.
We are using MATMAS03 because this interface exists since 46B.
Now we send an Material with BD10 and Message Type ZMATMAS.
The Master and Commuidoc are successfull created. In BD87 the commuidoc is an MATMAS03 and has the expected 2 segements E1MARAM and E1MAKTM.
But what we do not expect, if we look into the content of E1MARAM there are ALL Fields which exist for the E1MARAM in release 7.00. Not only our 3 fields MSGFN MATNR PSTAT, or as we second expect only the segemnts that had existed in the segemnt E1MARAM in release 46B of MATMAS03.
The additional fields were filled with the NODATA sign.
My question is: Is it correct that an IDOC with basic type MATMAS03 can have an segement E1MARAM which is formated like the segemntdefinition E2MARAM007 (Release 7.00 / 6.03)?
The difference is definatly the length of the field! 876 in 7.0 vs 757 in 4.6A.
Why is SAP using the highest available segemnt release regardles which basic type we choose?
Isnt this wrong?
Additional infos:
We know that it is not possible to have an IDOC with basic type MATMAS03 with an segement e.g. E1MARA1 which only exists in newer basic type MATMADI if segemnt release is set to 46B in our distribution model.
Failure is: Segment E1MARA1 is unknown in Release 46B/ (correct and expected behavior)
If we are using this scenario with not an reduced message type, we will only find the fields in E1MARAM which are filled with data. (Not all fields of the latest release with nodata)
I traced the MASTER_IDOC_CREATE_MATMAS and hit the function IDOC_REDUCTION_FIELD_REDUCE. As you can see in it, it first checks if the idoc is an reduced message type, and at the end, fills up all fields with the "empty_symbol" which have no data in it. Why is this only happening if it is an reduced message type?
Kind regards
ManuelAdditional Info:
In WE21 at the TRFC Port, it is possible to set this Option:
Send Only Fields of Selected Segment Version
The segment data of the IDoc is passed to this port with the length matching the segment definition of the release specified in the partner profile.
But if we are using an reduced message type, all fields of the newest release are in the segement.
The docu tells that this will be done in function EDI_DOCUMENT_OPEN_FOR_CREATE.
But it is never called when createing an material IDOC with BD10.
Bug or feature?
Kind regards
Manuel -
Hi guys,
Is there anyway to find out the right Basic type which suites our requirement?
SahilHi Michal,
My requirement is whenever a material is created/changed an IDOC should be triggerd.
we are using change pointers concept here.
MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_MATMAS is used to record the changes and its get triggerd when we create/change and then pass the idoc to PI for further processing.
I am also extending my IDOC by adding few fields.
My question is:
1.How do i know which basic type to use?
2.Do i need to populate the fields for an extended IDOC using some enhancements/EXITs or just pass the extended IDOC to PI?
please reply
Sahil -
Idoc basic type and extension copied to new extension now how to trigger
HI EXPERTS,
I have copied a basic type and extension of idoc and now my new idoc has extension name say ext1.
my old extension name is ext .
now i want to trigger an idoc with ext1 extension ,i do not want to change idoc settings in we20.
how can i do this ,please some one reply .
Thanks,
Pradeep.hi nikhil,
reason is we want two different transport paths ,one team is amking changes to existing things ,i am working on another pahse of project .
I have almost reached near to the solution .i have set the message variant in we20 ,now when i trigger its generating 2 idocs
i am trying to write code in exit but in exit there there is no field idoc_mescod or idoc_cimtype
Kindly suggest!!!1
Thanks,
pradeep. -
IDoc basic type FIDCCH01 with error F5866
Iu2019m trying to create an iDoc with basic type FIDCCH01 and message type FIDCCH type. Iu2019m getting error F5866 u201CWhen calling up the interface to financial accounting, no entry was made in the transfer parameter "Application key" when I process the idoc. I do not see an idoc value by this name. What am I missing in my config?
Thanks,
StanStan,
First, I'd like to mention that you determine where the error message F5866 is used by entering this message in transaction SE91 and pressing the where-used function. This won't show you any of the dynamic message calls, but it does indicate that function modules FI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE and FI_DOCUMENT_CHECK_CHANGE are both possible origins for the message you received. These function modules are part of the FI Interface which I am assuming is called during the processing of your IDoc.
ACCHD-AWREF is one of the values passed to the FI Interface function modules, and message F5866 is returned when that field is blank. This is why I assume that the IDoc in question is missing a value for the AWREF field.
Based on that assumption, I checked the definition for the IDoc type that you mentioned, FIDCCH01, via area menu WEDI. This IDoc type contains a segment E1FIREF with field AWREF. You can use transaction WE02 to display the IDoc causing the error and check to see if the actual data for E1FIREF-AWREF is blank (ultimately leading to the blank ACCHD-AWREF value and error F5866).
Cheers,
Jamie -
IDoc Basic Type needed for FI & CO posting with local & document currency
Hi All,
I am using basic type u201CFIDCCP02u201D which has local and document currency separately and posts to FI and CO segments but without any validations. This results in erroneous entries like posting to a cost center that cost center is not linked to company code.
Is there a basic type that I can use which posts to FI and CO with all validations similar to t-code FB01 and have fields to post local and document currency separately?
Thanks,
LeoHi Umesh,
Select 'Display Currency' button
Choose Local currency radiobutton and click Enter.
Let me know if it worked.....
Deepthi. -
Hi ,
I am creating idocs for vendor invoices.Txn FB60.
Here in txn i have a field XMWST ( Calculate tax ).This is a mandatory
field for my requirement.But this field was not found in the segments
of basic idoc type FIDCCP02.Could you tell me whether i have to map
some other field that does the same functionality of XMWST.Help me out to
solve this issue.
Thanks.Extend the basic idoc type FIDCCP02 in WE30 & Cretae the field that u want . If this is an outbound then , populate the new field under the user-exit of the standard function module that populates this idoc.
Regards,
Barath.
(Reward if the info helps u )
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to change the default look and feel
Hi. Does anyone knows how to change the default Caspian look and feel to, for example, Nimbus ? Or the skin feature turns look and feel setting, as We know in java, unnecessary in javafx ? I´m using javafx 1.2. Cheers
-
My wife just got this iPad mini and I want to copy the address book on my iPad 2 over to the mini. Can I use iCloud to do this and what are the steps. The 2 devices have different Apple IDs.
-
HI All I had created a User Form using Screen Painter, and while working with that form everything is fine , but when Iam trying to Update a record its shows an error message saying that "This entry already exists in the following tables "(@TBL_INDER
-
Hi friends, How to underline a word in ABAP reporting like MS-Word? Name : <u>Thayalan </u> Age : <u> 30</u> Thanks & Regards, Thayalan
-
Strange issue with ADF table in chrome browser
I have ADF table which should display 23 rows, but only 20 rows are visible in chrome browser, but other browsers like IE, firefox displays the 23 rows correctly. I have used default ADF table with Drag&drop behaviour in this table. All the 23 rows e