Idoc collective processing

Hi We have a custom idoc(Inbound) for posting goods movements...Actually it does goods movements through two seperate BDC calls and returns the material document number in the status.When we process two or more idocs through a batch processing at a same time..the first idoc goes through do the posting corretly but the second and third doesnt do anything but gets 53 status and also picks up the material doc number of the first idoc in status...
Each idoc goes through correctly when processed individually...What might be the problem....?and how it could be corrected...?
Thanks,
Larry

Hi,
As Manohar said ,the problem is due to variables refresh. One of the variables is setting to success status after processing of the first idoc , i think the same status is transfered to next idoc's also.
follow below steps to identify the problem.
1.Change the partner profile settings to 'Collective method' , then idoc's will be created with 64 status.
2.then put a break point at processing function module.
3.use BD87 or program : RBDAPP01 to process 64 status idoc's , while processing idoc's take more than one 64 status idoc. then you will know the exact problem.due to break point, program will go to debug mode, after processing of the first idoc then start debugging the program with second idoc processing.
Regards
Appana

Similar Messages

IDoc Collection in BPM and Without BPM

Hi All
I'm much confused on IDoc collection for which i require your expertise to clear my doubts. My primary question is based on the context "Multimapping doest work with idocs".
consider the case -> collect files-idoc scenario. Using BPM i need to have
a multimapping scenario. In the transformation step we will have a container element where mutiline is enabled so that the collected files are transformed into one abs interface. my dopubt arises here when i consider this scenario without bpm that is N:1 mapping (no collection). in this case why this multimapping works in bpm process and not incase of non-bpm scenarios? is it because in bpm the mapping happens in BPE?
pls clarify.
thks
Prabhu

>>>>In an N:1 scenario without BPM, how could you send more than one message to your multi-mapping? You can't.
yes we cant as this validation is not supported at abap stack level and N:1 is possibkle without BPM (or i'm missing something here). but this same step with bpm get executed succceffuly. whats the logic behind it
Message was edited by:
Prabhu S

What is the difference beween idoc package and idoc collection

Hi friends,
    i am unable to understand difference betwen Idoc package and Idoc cillection.
    Please give me clear clarification.
Thanks and regards
Bhanu

Hi Bhanu,
Apart from the replies above, in case you're looking for an answer from ECC perspective, here are some inputs: (ECC is considered as sender here)
1. IDoc Collection:
   This will collect the IDocs and will not immediately send it to the target system after they are created. Program RSEOUT00 can be later scheduled for these collected IDocs to deliver them to the target. You can treat this as a park and process approach which proves useful in several business scenarios.
This standard link gives more insight:
SAP Library - IDoc Interface/ALE
2. IDoc Packaging:
    This defines the number of IDocs to be packed and sent in 1 RFC call (tRFC). If you set is as 20, then 20 IDocs will be sent in 1 tRFC request. This doesn't connote whether the IDocs will be triggered immediately or later, this just talks about the bundling of IDocs per RFC call.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Abhishek

Idocs parallel processing

Hi,
We have some goods movement idocs(MBGMCR/MBGMCR03)getting posted simultaneosly.(Std ALE idocs no customization)We dont want to collect it and process it(timing issue).When we allow it to process immediately material batch combination gets locked out and one idoc goes through and others fail...i know we can collect it and process it through a batch prog setting RBDAPP01 variant with no prallel processing but is there any way i can switch on immediately and allow each idocs to process one by one avoiding parallel processing..?
Thanks,
Larry

Hi Larry,
Please check your partner profile (WE20) and set to trigger immediately under processing by function module area.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Collective Processing VL10 is not grouping deliveries for same sales parame

Hi.
Created multiple sales orders for same sales parameters like ship to, sold to, sales org, etc.
When tried to process collectively the delivery ceation via VL10, system generated group for each delivery selected instead of creating group for multiple deliveries.
When I compared my client's system config with Standard config client, it is exactly same in terms of all parameters, scenario profile, delivery creation profile,etc. The standard system works as expected and grouping the deliveris and create one group for multiple deliveries.
The group type is L and delivery categories we are tryign to group is J & T.
Thanks,

hi sridhar
Collective processing of deliveries means delivering the few order collectively. that means one delivery document for all orders.
In vl10h u can access only orders due for delivery.
first of all mark the orders line items to do collective processing deliveries.

Error : Pre Settings for IDoc inbound processing are missing error

Hi Experts,
There is a CRM job which executes LSMW and I am facing a strange problem during the IDOC posting the error "Pre Settings for IDoc inbound processing are missing error". Can anyone please tell me how to correct this error?
Thanks in advance.
Madhurima.

I'd start with the following document, with one modification. At step 12 after typing GEARAspiWDM press the Enter/Return key once prior to clicking OK. (Pressing Return adds a carriage return in the field and is important.)
[iTunes for Windows: "Registry settings" warning when opening iTunes|http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3299]

Delay in the Inbound Idoc Posting Process

Dear Friends,
We have an scenario in the Inbound Idoc Posting Process, when we process the Idocs through the standard Inbound Program - RBDAPP01, we face the delay of 3hrs to 12 hrs, approx.
When we try to re-process the same through the manual process, we could successfully post the Idocs, immediately.
When the same happens, through the background job - the delay is happening.
As we see, there is no problem with the program - RBDAPP01, but can't able to trace the delay in the process.
Any suggestions / advises are welcome.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Prasanna,
The update will happen only if a value already exists with the same unit of measure in the system. If the quantity is left blank in the system and if you are trying to update, the update might not happen. Even if the value is Zero in the system, provide the same unit of measure as the data used in the BAPI.
Regards,
Yogesh

Concurrency Visualizer Extension (VS2013): "An unknown error occurred while trying to start the collection process."

Not sure if this is the right place to ask about this but since my question concerns an extension I'll give it a shot.
I'm trying to use the Visual Studio 2013 Concurrency Visualizer extension to debug a simple test console application. I've set executive paging to disabled in the registry as it directed and hit "add SDK to project" in the concurrency
visualizer menu options. And of course, restarted my computer to apply the settings. When I try to "start [the concurrency visualizer] with current project" I get an error popup:
"An unknown error occurred while trying to start the collection process."
I really need the concurrency profiling to start debugging contention in my multithreaded application. Prompt assistance would be much appreciated.

Hi,
This forum is to discuss and ask questions about extending and integrating with Visual Studio (using the Extension Manager, building VSX containers for deployment, Visual Studio SDK, and more), Visual Studio Online (REST APIs, service hooks, and OAuth),
and Team Foundation Server.
You have problems when using Concurrency Visualizer Extension, please ask in
the page under "Q AND A". Since Concurrency Visualizer is a diagnostic tool, you can post this issue in
Visual Studio Diagnostics (Debugger, Profiler, IntelliTrace) forum too.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

#'s coming up in IDOC when IDOC flatfile processed with RSEINB00

Hi,
We have given IDOCs in flatfile structure which are needed to be loaded in backend SAP R/3 through XI and it needs some transformation,so we are using XI for mapping in between,otherwise we would have processed directly into R3.
Basically we are placing IDOC Flatfile in a folder and we are running RSEINB00 program on XI through a file port in XI and IDOCS are getting created in Backend SAP R/3.
When we place IDOC flatfile in Windows folder and process the file we are getting #s in IDOC fileds(many fields) ,but we don't see any #s when we process the IDOC flatfile when placing IDOC flatfile on UNIX .Our XI/PI is running on UNIX.
please help,what causing the problem?
Thank you,
Regards,
Sathish

Hi Ravi kanth,
I see them (#s)in IDOC fields in backend SAP R/3 once the IDOC flatfile got processed.
as we are running RSEINB00 report on XI ,we noticed that empty tags are coming (from Windows OS Folder)in SXMB_MONI even before my mapping execution ,I think they are being populated as # in IDOC.but dont see this problem when IDOC file processed from UNIX folder.
You think ,if we save file in UTF-8 format or Binary might help rather than ANSI format and process it.
Thank you,
Sathish

LSMW idoc Inbound Processing settings

Hi,
We have done LSMW with BAPI method to create Bank master.
In Idoc Inbound Processing settings -
We created partner type as 'B' i.e, for BANK
While creating Partner Number it is not allowing to create Partner Number. The error is "Enter a permissible partner number"
Please let me know what would be the problem.
Regards,
Hari
Edited by: Bhatlapenumarthy Hari Krishna on Sep 12, 2008 9:31 AM

Hi,
Use patner type as US only and LSMW as Patner number.
this will surely solve your problem .
plz do this way :
The first requirement is a file port for the file transfer. If required, create a port of the file type via Maintain ports. To do this, position the cursor on "File" and press Create. You should be in change mode. SAP recommends:
Port: LSMW
Name: Legacy System Migration Workbench
Version: 3 (IDoc record types SAP Release 4.x)
Outbound file Please enter a (dummy) physical directory and a file name, i.e. u2018filelsmwu2019 ·
As an addition, you can specify a tRFC port. This port is required, if you do not want to create a file during data conversion but submit the data in packages directly to function module IDoc_Inbound_Asynchronous.
SAP recommends:
Port: assigned by the system
Version: 3 (IDoc record types SAP Release 4.x)
RFC destination: Name of R/3 System
Name of port: Legacy System Migration Workbench.
Then the partner type should be defined or selected. SAP recommends:
Partner type: "US" (User)
As of release 4.5A, this partner type is available in the standard system. Up to release 4.0B inclusive, this partner type is not available in the standard program and should be added. SAP recommends:
Partner type: Create US
Report name: /SAPDMC/SAP_LSMW_PARTNERTYPES
Form routine: READ_USER
Short description: any.
Finally a partner number should be defined or selected. SAP recommends:
Partner number: LSMW
Partner type: US
Partner status: A (active)
Type: US
Language: DE or EN
Person in charge: Your user ID.
Activate IDoc inbound processing
reference : help.sap
thanx.
Edited by: Dhanashri Pawar on Sep 12, 2008 7:10 AM

IDoc Inbound Processing for CREMDM & DEBMDM

Hi experts,
I'd like to gather some feedback from you regarding the topic ERP IDoc Inbound Processing for CREMDM & DEBMDM. As you all know, there's currently no option to directly process CREMDM/DEBMDM IDocs in ERP. Currently you have to use PI for splitting the CREMDM/DEBMDM message into its related ADRMAS and CREMAS/DEBMAS IDocs.
My areas of interest are:
1) How satisfied are you with the current situation? Does the split work? Are there issues or problems in the current message handling? What are the Pro's and Con's from your point of view?
2) What would be the requirements for a CREMDM/DEBMDM handler? What would you expect? Maybe you have implemented something similar on project basis and could post some feedback?
One painpoint I'd see with a CREMDM/DEBMDM inbound is that you'll lose the IDoc Monitoring capabilities. The message split allows a single record tracing in the IDoc Monitor (as there is a 1:1 relation between IDocs and records). This changes for the mass processing. The monitor would display only the status of the IDoc and you'd need some other monitoring capabilities to check the results on record level. What are your thoughts about that? Is the monitoring important? Would the application log be a feasible solution for that challenge?
Additional comments are welcome, of course.
Best regards
Michael
PS: @ Matt, please contact me by mail. thanks.

Hello ,
Here are some other pain areas regarding the message split :
1. Complicated monitoring proess & reprocessing error idocs : We have to monitor ADRMAS & CREMAS or ADRMAS & DEBMAS during inbound processing. Also we could not find any best practices to reprocess error idocs. E.g. If ADRMAS fails & CREMAS succeeds what is the impact . Also the impact if it is reveresed. We know for sure that if CREMAS fails , vendor will not be created / updated. But we could not find specific pointers for ADRMAS failures.
2. It is a tedious process to link CREMAS with corresponding ADRMAS idoc specially when SAP maintains internal number range for vendors.
3 . The process is complicated if you are managing customer or vendor contact information with contact address . We could succesfully implement the integration but it took us a while to reach end-point.
4. Splitting really does not seem to support if ERP maintains internal number range.
5. Another major issue we observed is , if ADRMAS is under process & corresponding DEBMAS or CREMAS is posted , it fails raising the message that Account is locked. Default serialization does work in ERP system . But overlap of few microseconds also cause this error.
Hope this helps !!
Please let me know if you need any other specific details since we have used MDM - ECC integration using PI to its maximum extent .
Regards
Yogesh

IDOC Inboun processing success but no record posted to table

Hi,
We are performing ALE refresh in RCD221 (development system). The ALE IDOCS are extracted for HR area with Message class as HRMD_A, the IDOCS are processed successfully from the sending system (RCB) and reaches the receving system RCD221. While we process the inbound IDOCS in RCD221 records are not getting posted in the table, however the IDOC status is shown as successful (53). This is happening when we are processing the data for object type 'P'.
Regards,
Bharath Mohan B.

RFC destinations, Logical systems, and then Partner profiles needs to be maintained. and You need to create the Distribution model in sender system.
Partner profiles maintained in both the systems, soure Outbound properties
Target Inbound properties.
if you have two clients in system it will be easily you can check.

RFC For IDoc outbound processing

I am creating an RFC for BDC for call transaction we19
input as : idoc number
and output:-.. iDoc Outbound processing done
so:-
I go to we19> give iDoc Number (say, some number for ALEREQ01), and execute> click on Outbound processing-->click enter -->enter
in this way, I can process any iDoc from SAP system to outbound.
I want to create RFC for the same.
Problem:-
when i am executing that RFC, and when I check the iDoc status in we05, that iDoc shows status as Idoc ready to dispatch( its in yellow color).. Its not showing green color and not saying that IDoc passed OK
when I try manually ,I see the status green..OK..successfully
Any idea why I am getting this problem??
Is there any problem in my BDC recording?..but when I run that recording for Process, i dont see any problem,it executes successfully.. but when I copy the Code from BDC and make a RFC using that code, its giving problem as mentioned.

Hi Ankit,
Theorotically it should work.... but I'll suggest not to use BDC here. What you can do is,
1. You have Idoc number..Right?
2. Read control record from EDIDC and data record from EDID4.
3. Then call Master_idoc_distribute.
4. This will again distribute the same IDoc with same control and data record as a new one. It will be same as WE19 , but without WE19.
Please check and confirm.
Regards,
Audy.

Idocs not processed automatically in BW

Dear Experts,
I have a scenario here where I extract data from source system via process chains.
The source system job completed and in BW, the outbound idocs resulted in the following Status (02).
02 Error passing data to port 1
In the infopackage message dialog, I got the message as
Could not find code page for receiving system
Errors have been reported in Business Information Warehouse during the IDoc update:
In order to resolve this, I'm manually processing the idoc using program RBDAGAIN.
Note: This issue occurs only when I trigger the infopackage via process chains.
How do I rectify this error so that the idocs are processed automatically in BW?
Br, Harish

Hi,
how much time your ecc job takes to finish job.
Is this process chain newly created one or old one?
if its old one, any changes were applied on this process chain recently?
is it showing any idoc numbers at below status bar.
if yes then try to pull them by using t code BD87.
Can you share info pack error message screen shot.
Thanks

Please provide the Message type ,IDOC TYPE , PROCESS CODE for Edi 990 ,214

Hi friends,
Please provide the Message type ,IDOC TYPE , PROCESS CODE for Edi 990 (Response to a Load Tender)., 214 (Shipment Status )
For shipement status i got trxstc01 for idoc type .. but its only before 4.6 version ..for 4.7 its not there .. please give the alternate for that ...
Thanks in Advance ....
If any one is provide exact answer i will give Max marks ..
Edited by: ajay KOLLA on Aug 6, 2009 8:04 AM

Hi,
Have you resolved this issue. If yes, can you please let me know. Im actually looking for same for EDI 867 (guess it is for summary report and need to know message type, Idoc type associated with this).
Rgds
Sudhanshu

Idoc collective processing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for