Idoc count not reflecting soon in WE02 Transaction
Hi All,
We are working on one scenario where PI picks the file and posts the IDOCs to ECC.
When we were testing in Quality for multiple files the number of record count of IDOCs in WE02 transaction used to reflect with in seconds in ECC.
When we are testing in Production IDOC count in WE02 is not getting reflected with in short time and its taking lot of time for processing IDOCs.
configuration with respect to PI is same, Any suggestions on this. Has any one faces this kind of instance.
Thanks..
When we were testing in Quality for multiple files the number of record count of IDOCs in WE02 transaction used to reflect with in seconds in ECC.
When we are testing in Production IDOC count in WE02 is not getting reflected with in short time and its taking lot of time for processing IDOCs.
Pretty common issue...In quality system you didn't have teh same load as you have in production. What I mean is in production you have N number of other interfaces running and hence the load on PI server is more which results in the delay.
You can check this document for sizing & performance enhancement techniques which can increase the performance a bit(provided its already not implemented).
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2016a0b1-1780-2b10-97bd-be3ac62214c7?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Regards
Soumen...
Similar Messages
-
ITouch play count not reflected on computer
I know this was raised before and was claimed to be fixed but I don't think so - there are songs I play on my iTouch which are not always reflected in the play count/last played on my computer. Version is 1.1.4 (4A102) and iTunes is 7.6.2.9.
Thoughts? Thanks.
-Bob.I am surprised this issue has not been appropriately been solved or cleared by Apple.
I have an iPod Touch with firmware 1.1.4 and iTunes 7.6.2.9. My old "regular and clunky" iPod (a 60 Gb unit) did sync well all the time.
Now, sometimes, my Touch does not update the Play Count.
As a reference:
- I have it on automatic synching
- I am referring also about "fully played songs" and not skipped ones
- iTunes DOES recognize the Touch: iTunes shows the Touch on its screen and puts on all the synching signs, and the Touch also shows on its display that it is synching. However, sometimes, nothing happens.
My last missing play count episode seems to have happened after I added a new list to the group of selected lists for synching (curiously, the list was just a sub-set of other, previously selected, lists, so its addition did not require uploading any new song to the Touch).
One of the worst issues with this is that it seems to be unpredictable. My Touch got back to synching earlier today after a couple of days of trouble.
Anybody has a clue?
I will do some tests and will report if I find anything I find, but will surely appreciate if anyone can provide some light on this uncomfortable issue.
Tks -
Some of the error idocs are not falling into Workflow Inbox
The extract of IDOC list with status 51 from WE02 transaction is not matching with Workflow inbox column "object", some of the idocs which are errored are not showing in the workflow inbox. Here we are in need to get all the errored idocs into the inbox. Please suggest me to proceed further.
Hi Smita,
Thanks for your reply.
I have maintained the suggested role SAP_GRC_SPC_SCHEDULER in backend for an user id and i can able to see a job is getting completed in SM37.
However, the task in the inbox hasnt come yet.Any idea you may have as to how much time it will take for task to come into inbox.Or is that i need to do any more extra task.
Please advice.
Thanks
Ashok S -
QM03-Custom tab-Change to text field not reflecting-FG - XQQM-screen-0106
Hi,
I have a requirement to change the text field on a custom tab of QM03 transaction. Quality notification type is Z1 and the tab is "Checklist". Both are custom defined.
The existing text field is of 3 lines. The new text message is of 8 lines. When I did the changes on the custom screen 0106 in the function group XQQM, the changes are not reflected on the QM03 transaction's custom tab. Only first 3 lines were reflecting the change and rest of the 5 lines are not appearing on the screen.
Pointers on this will be definitely helpful.
Regards,
Mallika.I had a similar problem, but it was with the message line. I found that with Web Forms, I had to issue the Synchronize; a second time, but in Client/Server Forms 6i, the first synchronize worked. Here is the code I used:
<pre><font face = "Lucida Console, Courier New, Courier, Fixed" size = "1" color = "navy"> SYNCHRONIZE;
if Get_Application_Property(User_Interface) = 'WEB' then
synchronize;--first does not work on web
end if;</font></pre>
Let us know if this works. -
Idoc not reflected in Xi server
Hi Friends,
I am configuring idoc to be passed to XI. I have followed the following steps
1)created port in r/3
2)configured the port in idx1 in XI
when i send the idoc from r/3 the Idoc is not seen on XI using the T code SXMB_MONI but able to see an error status in we02 in XI server the error states
"Basic type ORDERS02 does not exist"
can any one help why i am not able to see the idoc as XML in sxmb_moni instead seeing it in we02 as an Idoc.
Thanx
Anandmake sure you have followed the same to Sent IDOCs to XI;
In XI
SM59 - R3 connection pointing to R3
IDX1 - define the port with the above dest.
In R3
SM59 - R3 connection pointing to XI
WE21 - define the port with the above dest.
WE20 - Partner profile type outbound
Also can you check the following;
1. Check for any entries in SM58 in R3
2. In IDX2 verify if there si the metadata present for your R3 and the Idoc. (XI)
3. Check for entries in IDX5 (XI) -
Transactional Replication: Alter view changes are not reflect on Subscription database
Hi All,
we are configured transactional replication in our environment on sql server 2008 R2 , Yesterday I made a view alter on publisher database the view also present in replicated articles but unfortunately the changes not reflect in subscription, I already have
checked the : Replicate Schema change option in Subscription option its also true, there is not latency exist in replication monitor , i have checked the blocking on subscription and publication. one more thing I tested the changes on replicated table its
working fine
Please help me to fix the issue.
Regards,
Pawan Singh
ThanksHi Pawan,
According to your description, the alter on the view in publication doesn't be reflected in subscription database. As my analysis, the issue could be caused by that the distribution agent job doesn’t run after altering the view.
I make a test on my computer, and set up transactional replication to replicate tables and views. Firstly, when creating subscription, I set the distribution agent job ‘Run continuously’(as the screenshot below), and alter the view in publication database,
then the change is successfully reflected to the corresponding view in subscription database.
However, I also make another test with setting the distribution agent job ‘Run on demand only’(It is determined by you), and find that it is not reflected to subscription database unless I run the distribute agent job manually.
The distribution agent is used to read the updated transactions written to the distribution database and applies the change to the subscription database, so please check if your distribution agent job runs after you alter the view. If not, please run the
job and check if the issue still occurs.
Regards,
Michelle Li -
Creation or change in WEB UI not reflecting in BP transaction
Hi,
I have a requirement in which whatever entry is there in Country field should be defaulted to Authorization Group field . When I am creating a new corporate account by filling all the mandatory fields in the UI and pressing enter and save, the authorization group field is getting defaulted in WEB UI and the change is reflecting in BP transaction under the Control Tab. But when I am creating a new corporate account by filling all the mandatory fields in the UI without pressing enter and pressing only the save button, the authorization group field is getting defaulted in WEB UI and the change is not reflecting in BP transaction under the Control Tab. help me out guys.
Thanks and Regards,
Surya.Hi Surya.
Not sure what version of CRM you are working on but transaction BP is not supported from CRM 2007 (I Think, else CRM 7.0), so what you're experiencing maybe linked to this.
Regards
Arden -
Problem with calling we02 transaction code from web dynpro
Hello everyone,
I want to skip the initial screen of we02 tcode for this i have created the URL, provided the idoc number and
used the function code DYNP_CODE=ONLI for execute button.
DATA : FINAL_URL TYPE STRING.
CONCATENATE 'host' '.port' '/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/webgui?~transaction=we02 DOCNUM-LOW='
ls_itab-docnum ';CREDAT-low=' ' ' ';DYNP_OKCODE=ONLI'
into FINAL_URL.
I am trying to pass the idoc number internally and click on execute button...so that the end user can see the idoc display directly, rather than clicking the execute button manually. But, unfortunately the function code for execute buttong (ONLI) is not working. In WE02 tcode, provided input values are appeaing correctly but not triggering the execute button.
Please help!
Thanks in advance...Hi Rohit.,
Did u tried my previous reply., Use., & ~OKCODE=ONLI .,
http://host:8000/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/webgui?sap-system-login-basic_auth=X&sap-client=800&sap-language=EN&transaction=we02&okcode=ONLI
tis will work.,
Thanks & Regards
Kiran -
Hi All,
My webapplication server contains dual stack.
I have a JAVA Webdynpro application which is using java api to generate and send the IDocs.
I Idocs generated from Java API is being sent to a External R3 system which is configured in portal.
Since we are sending the Idocs generated directly to external R3 system, the Idocs are not being tracked in ABAP stack's (WE02) transaction of the WebApplication server.
Please let me know how to send Idocs, so that they can be tracked in ABAP stack.
Thanks & Regards,
PavanHi Rohit.,
Did u tried my previous reply., Use., & ~OKCODE=ONLI .,
http://host:8000/sap/bc/gui/sap/its/webgui?sap-system-login-basic_auth=X&sap-client=800&sap-language=EN&transaction=we02&okcode=ONLI
tis will work.,
Thanks & Regards
Kiran -
UI Screen Configs not reflecting on the web
For doing screen configuration, when I click on the frame to configure, the system is picking up std key and not the custom key zpartman though zpartman key is there in the list. ( Note: Zpartman key is the one assigned to this role ). Therefore if I do config in zpartman key, it's not reflecting on the web. Please reply what could be the reason and the solution.
Thanks
TRHi TR
first access the standard and check the configuration info such as what is the configuration key , object and subobject .
Then access your custom configuration screen and check what it was looking for and what is it picked , change your custom configuration accordingly what it was looking for (by making changes to configuration key, object and sub object).
Check that you are accessing in the same client if not transport the request to other client using SCC1 transaction.
Thanks & Regards
Raj -
Unread message count not updating in Mail.app
I am running a MBP 15" with 10.4.10 and Mail.app (version 2.1.1 build 752.3) and as you can see in this screengrab here:
the unread message count is not correctly updating.
This may actually be something for the Mail dev' team to handle, unless some one else out there in the groups has some inside knowledge about this issue.
For that matter, I do not know how to forward this to the Mail dev' team inside Apple, so if any one else does, please do.
Cheers.
Jason
MBP 15; 2.16 ghz; 2gb RAM; 100gb; Mac OS X (10.4.10) Palm Treo 680 + Cisco 1242 WAP + xo.net + Hyatt Embarcadero room serviceJason,
What screengrab?
What type of account do you have -- POP, IMAP or .mac? How many accounts do you have? Do you access your account from more than one computer?
Unread message count where -- on the Mail Icon in the Dock or in individual mailboxes? In the Dock, the Unread message count will NOT reflect any messages moved to custom mailboxes by Rules, but only those in the Inboxes.
Ernie -
Conditions in Calculation Schema not reflecting in Purch Info Record
Hi,
We are using calculation procedure TAXIN.
We have maintained Calculation Schema & maintained required conditions.
When we checked for maintaining these conditions in Purchasing Info Record, (Transaction Code - ME11 / ME12), these conditions are not appearing in the info record. But, the conditions appearing in the info record are not same as those in the Calculation Schema.
Also, the conditions maintained in Info Record are not getting copied to Purchase Order (except Base Price P000).
What could be the reason behind this? How to correct the same?
Regards,
Prashant KolhatkarTax procedure condtions will not appear in the info record. for the conditon which is not reflecting in the PO, you may check in inforecord whether there is a check mark in condition record saved for approval; if so it is deleted
-
AR Down Payment Invoice Does Not Reflect in BP Master Data...
We have placed a sales order for a BP.
We select payment means and accept the payment
In the background a AP Down Payment Invoice is created
When we view the BP master data - the account ballance window does NOT reflect this "down payment"
If we select the golden arrow at account ballance, uncheck "reconciled transactions" you can see the payment and AP down payment and they clear each other out.
The problem is that when the final invoice is created it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. Even if you are simply working at the BP master data window, it is not obvious that a down payment has been received. I belive our process is correct because If you click the TDP box, the payment is listed and will be applied to the final invoice.
It simply does not alert the user that a payment had been received.
What are we doing wrong?????\
Thank you!
Edited by: Andrew Bleier on Feb 4, 2009 1:27 AMKeith Taylor
You are right this feature is only available in Version 2007A. There account posting happen purely due to the pay SAP has been designed and the configuration of GL Accounts.
To make fundametal change to the core product is very difficult if you explain me your business process exactly as you do, I could think of alternatives.
Please let know.
Suda -
IDOC is not processing in R/3 with status 64(Urgent)--Production issue.
Dear Folks,
Here we are implementing MIRROR sytem for data extraction in to BIW.
I had gone through the steps in PDF file(How to minimize down thime for Delta Initialization) which has given by SAP.
These are following steps I had performed in BW production
1. Using RSADMIN transcation- Assigned one user as a Debugging user.
2. With the Debugging user Created one infopackage on Purhcasing ITM datasource--
In data selection tab, I given date as from 2002 to 2003
In Update tab, I selected update mode as Initialize Delta process- without data transfer and Uncheck Update Data in master system immediately
In schedule tab I selected option Start Data load immediately then Start extraction.
3.Data was requested and It was intialized properly with green status 1 from 1 Records.
4. In details tab Request, Extraction, transfer(IDOC and TRFC), Processing everything in Green color.
5.As per document I have checked in R/3 for IDOC with status 64 using transaction BD87/WE05
Problem is that IDOC is not processing in R/3 system. for that IDOC I have checked in BW montior screen using the option <b>IDOC list in Source sytem</b>, here also it is not showing any IDOCs.
Please let me know why BW sytem is not sending any IDOCs to source sytem.Is there any settings I could have miss in BW aswell as in R/3 system.
Note: In BW production I successfully loaded master data from R/3. aswell as I triggered infopackage-Initialization with data transfer, it is showing IDOC number properly in R/3 system.
Points is Assured for all replies.Hi,
- check you RFC destination (normal test + authorization test)
- Check you partner profiles in WE20 and its ports WE21
- from the source system tree (RSA13) right click your source system and perform a check
- the best is to restore your source R/3 source system from BW (right click on it ans select RESTORE); you'll need to be able to log in the source system as an admin as well as opening the source system for customizing in SCC4 so that BW can recreate the correct partner parameters automatically; the best is to do that with your basis group.
hope this helps,
Olivier. -
Changes are not reflecting on Script layout
Hi Gurus,
I made chandes in SO10 standard include this include can be used in Script,
when ever I copied script from DEV client to Test Client changes are visible in SO10 include text But not reflecting while executing the Script through Transaction.Please suggest.
Thank You,
Usha.G>
ushasri gadipally wrote:
> I copied script using scc4 and created a transport request even so10 include also, But not reflecting on Script layout.t
Check if the std. text changes are reflected in your testing server in SO10. If not you have to import the Std. Text using SCC4 as well.
Maybe you are looking for
-
can someone show me a code which shows the working of rtfeditor in jeditorpane.i want to have the multiple text format effect that u have in yahoo chat room.u can have multiple coloured text and multi script letters in the same text field at the same
-
Wanna add Nokia S60 emulators to WTK 2.5.1
Hi, guys! I installed the Nokia S60 3rd Edition SDK for Symbian OS, Supporting Feature Pack 2, for MIDP (Beta release) into the direcotry C:\S60 and its emulators works well with Netbeans IDE 5.5.1 with mobility pack. Now I want to add the emulators
-
After the update of iTunes 10.3.3, I have been un-able to sync my iPhone 4 without iTunes asking me to restore my iPhone using an old back-up that I have on an external hard drive. Once I went ahead and restored it, but then when I went to sync them
-
Hi All, Where can we mantain the gloabl emoplyee number if its in 4.6c or other version also. ASAP help woule be apprecaited Thanks and Regards
-
Process chain is not triggering
Hi All We have around 4 process chains. these are triggering by an event and these are triggeing since 1 month. We have checked and tried to run them direc scheduling with immediate option. But no use and the process chain will show in yellow and no