Idoc data comparison between different R/3 clients.

Hi ppl ,
Is there a way idoc comparison can be done between different clients without going
by Segment by Segment comparison ?
I have a requirement wherein i have thousands of idocs in QA system and i need to
compare those with the ones in PROD system. The segments in the idocs may vary
depending on the data that flows from the third party system which will post idocs in R/3.
So, the segment wise comparison of data is also ruled out .
Do we have any standard reports which will help in achieving this purpose ?
Please let me know how the idoc data comparison can be carried out .
Regards,
Nick.

Hi Nick,
There is no standared tools available for comparing the data of two idocs.
By using beyond compare s/w you can check the data, but the thing is you have to download the idoc data to file format.
By using Idoc_xml_transform function module you can download idoc data to xml format, after you can compare.
Check this
http://download.cnet.com/Beyond-Compare/3000-2242_4-10015731.html
Regards
Ramesh

Similar Messages

EhP5 Report: Actual/Actual Comparison Between Different Ledgers

Dear all,
Hoping that someone here has faced the same challenge and found a solution...
My client wants to see a side-by-side comparison of the financial statements for several ledgers; ideally three, but two will do.
It appears that EhP5 includes an enhancement of the standard actual/actual comparison report which allows a comparison between two ledgers. However, we are running EhP4, and an upgrade is unlikely to happen very soon. Do you know whether the report is available separately? Our search for a separate SAP note was unsuccessful.
Our other alternative would be to develop a report ourselves, but if a standard solution is available, that would feel rather daft...
Thanks in advance!

Thanks for the advice - as the system would not let me create versions for these non-FISL ledgers, I assumed it was not possible to run the report for them at all.
Unfortunately, I do not have the actual/actual comparison for two different years built in, nor the financial statement version, so we may still have to develop a new report (as per project standards, in BI rather than ERP)...
Kind regards

IDOC data transfer between 2 SAP Clients on same system

HI All,
i was transferring data through standard IDOC from table A609 in client 100(say) to client 301(say).
Sender u2013 100 (sender side)
Receiver u2013 301 (receiver side)
I did all configurations that were required for transferring data.
But at receiving side i.e. client 301, data is not populating in the table A609.
The status at sender side is:
status 03: Data Passed to port OK.
But the status is at the receiving side is:
status 64: IDOC ready to be transferred to application (yellow light)
My query is why the data is not getting populated in table at receiver end.
Waiting for your responses.......

Hi,
Instead of using idoc ..
You can write code in RFC function module and update the table directly.
If it is a Application i mean transaction back end many tables need to update on that case Idoc is necessary other wise use RFC preferabble,
Program RBDMANI2 for status 51 & 52
Program RBDAPP01 for status 64 ,66 "Run this Program By Passing Idoc number it will turn to Green and Table wil be updated
Program RBDAGAIE for status 32 and 69 (Edited IDocs)
Program RBDSYNER for status 26
Program RSEOUT00 for status 30
re-process IDocs failing in 29 status, use program RBDAGAIN.
transactions WEINBQUEUE and WEOUTQUEUE to control the individual queues
Regards,
Prabhuads

IDoc Data Lost between ECC and MII Message Listener.

We have recently experienced some network issues which caused the IDoc's to stop flowing outbound from ECC to MII Message Listener. This happened 3 times during a network switch reconfiguration. 2 of the three occasions the MII Message listener had to be restarted on the MII server in order to get data to flow again. Interestingly some of the IDocs that were generated during this outage time were processed by the message listener and some didn't.
We are running MII 12.0 sp11 and ECC 6.0. The ECC server and MII server are located in different geographic locations.
When we look at the ECC system in WE05 we see only sucessful status for the IDoc messages saying the Data passed to port OK.
When we check the Message listener on the MII end there it only shows processed successfully. There are no failed messages or messages without rules.
Where can I check further to see the IDocs that really didn't make it to be processed by the Message Listener on the MII server?
Also is it possible that these IDocs that got lost somewhere are still sitting on the ECC or MII servers somewhere where we can re-process them?
And the Last question is, Why didn't the Message Listener handle the network issue automatically instead of needing to restart it?

Hi Robert,
Did SAP ever respond/resolve the ticket you created for this issue? Someone told me that this was a known issue, but I have yet to have it verified by SAP. They asked me to simulate the issue - but our non-prod systems are on a VM server with other systems. So I can't exactly start pulling network cables out - I did drop it from the network a few time while sending IDOCs down - but this failed to hang the processing of the IDOCs.
We're hopefully going to MII 14/15 next year - but the business is keen to resolve this issue as it has impacted production a few times. The MII sites are in some remote regions and I don't think we can really improve the WAN links much further.
@Christian - thanks for the link, we don't really have an issue with IDOC's not being received, its just the message processing just hangs and we either need to restarted the services or sometimes the system.

Data comparison between 2 models

hi,
we've 2 models - consolidation and planning in our BPC 10.0 environment.
we consolidate actuals and send data to planning using BADI embedded logic script.
Some times, we are seeing differences between CONSOLIDATION model and PLANNING model data. So, we'd like to develop an automated process that looks for difference of data between 2 models and alert business, if there is any.
Any suggestions on how best we could implement this process?

Hi,
You have 2 options:
1. Some detailed comparison report in Excel...
2. Badi developed to compare 2 models on the level of base members and showing the comparison results in script log (only mismatched values with members).
We use 2nd option in the similar case.
B.R. Vadim

How to sync data/apps between different iTouches?

I have my itouch, and some apps for my kid.
If I buy a new itouch, I'd like to move all my existing data to the new ipod touch, then put only a few apps on the old ipod touch.
how would i go about managing multiple ipod touch devices using itunes?
Can I mix and match apps between the various ipods?

You can sync as many ipods as you like to one computer/library.
Each device is different and can be set to sync whatever you like.

Billing master data - Comparison between systems.

Hi Gurus:
We need to compare billing master data between DEV, QAS and PRD to see the differences, since we must normalize the 3 ambients before starting a high impact project in our rates.
¿There is any standard functionality that allows me to make this comparison?.
If not so, was thinking of a customer program (Z) to directly compare the table entries: ESCHS, EKDI, ETRF, TE221, ETTAF, ETTA, ERTFND, TE069, EPREI, etc.
Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
David

When I need to compare my Billing tables, I have my Basis guys run SCMP (table compare) and provide them the tables names to use. They have the option to give you only the differences which is nice since that is what I am usually looking for.
Good Luck!

Date comparison behaves differently in deployment

Hi All
I needed to compare dates entered by the user when selected thru an lov or inputed. So I went about converting the string dates in its screen related format(dd/MM/yyyy) to comparable oracl date format(yyyy-MM-dd). I'm not sure why I went for yyyy-MM-dd, but thats how I guess it expected it when comparing.
- The lov provides the items in String format
- I convert string date to oracle.jbo.domain.date with the required format
- and then do the comparison
Now the problem I'm having is the comparison works fine in IWLS, but it does not compare when I deploy the app.
The IWLS is 11.1.1.3 and the deployment server is 11.1.1.6.
Also the IWLS is in a windows box and the server is in linux.
I'm not sure that the server or OS would be an issue which I suspect it wouldnt be.
The reason I pointed out the OS and server versions is because the logs that I print out shows different date formats when run in both servers.
for instance, in IWLS/Win, my log shows
rowDateSTRING= 01/09/2012, convertedRowDateDATE=Sat Sep 01 00:00:00 GMT 2012, finalEndDateDATE=2012-09-01
in my deployed app on WLS/linx 11.1.1.6 it shows
rowDateSTRING= 01/09/2012, convertedRowDateDATE=Sat Sep 01 00:00:00 WST 2012, finalEndDateDATE=2012-09-01
Notice the WST vs GMT.

Also the date forma displayed on the screen is different to that when I entered it.
I entered in dd/MM/yyyy format and on reslecting the row in the view page the entered row is displayed as mm/dd/yyyy.
But in IWLS, its the same when I enter and when I view
Edited by: bigchill on 26/02/2013 19:46

Data exchange between different application domains

is this possible?
say i have example.com/swf_1.swf which dynamically loads a module example.com/swf_2.swf in a different application domain. is it possible to still exchange data between the two swf files? if so, how?
thanks.

Have a study of LocalConnection Class
link is:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=security2_13.html

Data migration between different ECC versions

Is there a way to migrate data between two different ECC versions?
I know that there are differences between the tables and therefore TDMS transports are not possible. But is there another way to get master data from one version (6.0 EHP 3) to another one (6.0 EHP 4)? For example a tool that can prepare the exported data for the import in a higher version?
thx

That's indeed the most feasible option we have on the table right now. Although we have a lot of Z-fields and would need to transfer them with LSMW.
The ZMATMAS has only been built for outbound...

Changes to data verification between 10g and 11g Clients

The 10g and 11.1.0.7 Databases are currently set to AL32UTF8.
In each database there is a VARCHAR2 field used to store data, but not specifically AL32UTF8 data but encrypted data.
Using the 10g Client to connect to either the 10g database or 11g database it works fine.
Using the 11.1.0.7 Client to go against either the 10g or 11g database and it produces the error: ORA-29275: partial multibyte character
What has changed?
Was it considered a Bug in 10g because it allowed this behavior and now 11g is operating correctly?

jfedynic wrote:
The 10g and 11.1.0.7 Databases are currently set to AL32UTF8.
In each database there is a VARCHAR2 field used to store data, but not specifically AL32UTF8 data but encrypted data.
Using the 10g Client to connect to either the 10g database or 11g database it works fine.
Using the 11.1.0.7 Client to go against either the 10g or 11g database and it produces the error: ORA-29275: partial multibyte character
What has changed?
Was it considered a Bug in 10g because it allowed this behavior and now 11g is operating correctly?
29275, 00000, "partial multibyte character"
// *Cause: The requested read operation could not complete because a partial
//          multibyte character was found at the end of the input.
// *Action: Ensure that the complete multibyte character is sent from the
//          remote server and retry the operation. Or read the partial
//          multibyte character as RAW.It appears to me a bug got fixed.

Master Data conflict between different sources

Hello Experts,
We have conflict in Master data which is getting extracted from different R3 systems.
So we have maintained the transcodifiction by adding Prefix ID of logical system ID for the second R/3 system where we have a confict in the Master data. (Say in my case we have this for 0Material, 0Vendor, 0Customer).
We have done this transcodification at the Transfer rule level by maintaining a routine for both the Attribut information and text information with some codifidition. And its working fine in Production.
Now we have stuck with the Hierarchy information for this?
As in the case of Attr and Text we have option to write a routine at the transfer rule level but we dont have the same for Hierarchy!!!!
So please guide me as to what needs to be done for the Hierarchy level transcodification. (We are not maintaining this routine at the Object level but we are maintaing this at transfer rule level because of some reasons).
Help me with the solution!
Thanks
Raman
Edited by: Raman R on Mar 31, 2009 8:04 AM

Are you maintaining hierarchy manually or loading via flat file ???
When you maintain you will have access to your transcoded master data hence you wil be able to maintain.
When you load from flat files you need to maintain it appropriately.
P.S : Didn't you go with compounding concept of sourcesystem or logsys to separate master data ??
Edited by: Praveen G on Mar 31, 2009 7:32 AM

Data guard between different platforms?

I'm pretty sure the answer is no but just want to be sure, so my question is...Can you have a data guard physical standby server that is running on a different platform than the primary?
For instance, We have just been informed by our sakes rep that Oracle is dropping the Itanium platform because future releases of red hat will no longer be supporting the Itanium platform and that Oracle is following the red hat model...
Can we setup dataguard to migrate off of current hardware platform to a new X86_64 platform?
Thanks.

user520056 wrote:
I'm pretty sure the answer is no but just want to be sure, so my question is...Can you have a data guard physical standby server that is running on a different platform than the primary?No, this is not possible.
For instance, We have just been informed by our sakes rep that Oracle is dropping the Itanium platform because future releases of red hat will no longer be supporting the Itanium platform and that Oracle is following the red hat model...
Can we setup dataguard to migrate off of current hardware platform to a new X86_64 platform?
Thanks.This would follow the same rule that both, primary and standby must run on the same platform and o/s. So I guess, the answer would be that you would need to move both of your servers. But, just to be assure, you should raise the same question on the dedicated forum of dataguard where product manager of DG , Larry Carpenter hangs around as well. That would be the place where I would ask my data guard doubts.
Data Guard
HTH
Aman....

Object Comparison between different systems

Hi to all,
any of you have made a program to compare object/object versions between diferent systems (with RFCs).
Can you tell me wich Function Models and tableshave you used.
I found a very usefull Function Model SVRS_GET_VERSION_DIRECTORY_46 very usefull for my purpose but i depared myself with a strange problem. The table VRSD used in this FM have all the Objects in the System but when i tried to transport a request between 2 diferent Systems no new entry was added to VRSD in the target system so SVRS_GET_VERSION_DIRECTORY_46 is no usefull.
Any one knows if there is any customizing relative to this table or any process to catch this transported objects in the target System?
There is one entry in E070 but here thre is no reference for Object versions.
Many thanks and any help will be very Helpfull.
Thanks In advance
PPaiva

Hi Pedro,
Can you let me know which object you are comparing? Were you not able to do remote comparision for that object?

Comparison insertion/search time between different Collection class

Hi,
Does someone know where I can find a clear an complete comparison between different JAVA class which implements interface Collection?
I want to compare:
- elements insertion time
- elements search/removal time
Thank you very much in advance
Diego

from wikipedia: Its purpose is to characterize a function's behavior for very large (or very small) inputs in a simple but rigorous way that enables comparison to other functions.
meaning if I ask how quick an algorithm is you might say it completes in 10 seconds but the next time you run it it might take 8 seconds. It kind of depends on what else your computer is doing/ how fast your computer is or how much data you are putting through ie if the puter has little memory it might need to use virtual memory which will have an effect on your performance.
Big O notation identifies how much work has to be carried out. The easiest example is a simple search of an array:
for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i] == "weijewr") {
return i;
}Where n represents a number of elements:
This takes O(n) (big Oh of N) as potentially you need to look at each element.
if you were to write a standard bubble sort it would be O(n2) as potentially you need to iterate the array once for each element.

Idoc data comparison between different R/3 clients.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for