Idoc error during syntax check - error26
hi everyone
I need help understanding where this idoc error is generating and what is it about. I went through the steps many times but it's still the same.
hi
where is the section which populates the segments? Could you ask for the info you need I am happy to take screen shots because till now from all suggestions so far I'm not able to solve this.
Here is the idoc program for this:
*& Report ZIDOCPG
REPORT ZIDOCPG.
PARAMETERS PLIFNR TYPE LIFNR.
PARAMETERS PNAME1 TYPE NAME1_GP.
PARAMETERS PORT01 TYPE ORT01_GP.
DATA VSEG LIKE Z1TRANS.
DATA VEDP13 LIKE EDP13.
DATA: BEGIN OF FEDIDC OCCURS 0.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE EDIDC.
DATA: END OF FEDIDC."MASTER IDOC
DATA: BEGIN OF TEDIDC OCCURS 0.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE EDIDC.
DATA: END OF TEDIDC."COMM IDOC
DATA: BEGIN OF TEDIDD OCCURS 0.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE EDIDD.
DATA: END OF TEDIDD.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM EDP13 INTO VEDP13 WHERE MESTYP = 'ZTMSG' AND
IDOCTYP = 'ZTRANS'.
VSEG-LIFNR = PLIFNR.
VSEG-NAME1 = PNAME1.
VSEG-ORT01 = PORT01.
TEDIDD-SEGNAM = VSEG.
TEDIDD-SDATA = VSEG.
APPEND TEDIDD.
*TO GEN IDOC CONTROL RECORD.
FEDIDC-MESTYP = 'ZTMSG'.
FEDIDC-DOCTYP = 'ZTRANS'.
FEDIDC-RCVPOR = VEDP13-RCVPOR.
FEDIDC-RCVPRN = VEDP13-RCVPRN.
FEDIDC-RCVPRT = VEDP13-RCVPRT.
APPEND FEDIDC.
CALL FUNCTION 'MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE'
EXPORTING
MASTER_IDOC_CONTROL = FEDIDC
TABLES
COMMUNICATION_IDOC_CONTROL = TEDIDC
MASTER_IDOC_DATA = TEDIDD.
COMMIT WORK.
Similar Messages
-
26 Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound)
Hi Experts
I am using TPSDLS - Idoc(outbound).
When we view in WE02 : for few of the deliveries it is working fine , but for some it is giving the following error
26 Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound)
Please any one help me out for the same
Thanks & Regards
ShavetaPlease check the segments for the idocs in error status in WE02. The segments in the idoc should be in the same sequence as defined while creating idoc in WE30.
For eg. taking the case of invoic02 idoc.
Segment E1EDP01 cannot come prior to segment E1EDK01.
As in WE30 it is defined to come after E1EDK01\
Please reward the points if this information is useful. -
Error 26: Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound)
Hi all,
I am getting error when we try to generate IDoc in Outbound process (to send data from SAP to external Interface).
Error no is 26. And I have checked the status records, it shows the below error message. "EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (too many repetitions of a group). According to the syntax description of the basic type SHPMNT05 (customer enhancement ZSHPMNT05), the segment group E1EDL37 can be repeated a maximum of 0000000260 times. However, this segment group occurs more frequently in the IDoc. Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type SHPMNT05 (customer enhancement ZSHPMNT05).
Can any one tell me is there any limitation for data records for segment E1EDL37?
Kindly suggest me what is the problem & what needs to be done to fix this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Mohammad.Hi Guys,
This is a problem which occurs throughout lots of SAP systems. This occurs due to someone changing the IDOCSYN table without making the neccessary changes to the EDISYN table.
For more information on this you can check out the note - 370021. Also if you run the following program in your system and make the changes to your IDOC segment, this error will go away.
(Please note that this program is provided by SAP and I just made a small adjustment by adding the COMMIT WORK AND WAIT statement) .
Hope this helps.
REPORT ze1edp19.
TABLES: idocsyn, edisyn, cimsyn.
DATA: old_idocsyn TYPE idocsyn,
lt_idocsyn TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF idocsyn,
ls_idocsyn TYPE idocsyn,
old_edisyn TYPE edisyn,
lt_edisyn TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF edisyn,
ls_edisyn TYPE edisyn.
PARAMETER idoc_typ TYPE idocsyn-idoctyp DEFAULT 'ORDERS05'.
PARAMETER idoc_seg TYPE idocsyn-segtyp DEFAULT 'E1EDP19'.
PARAMETER occmax TYPE idocsyn-occmax DEFAULT '99'.
PARAMETER upd_flag AS CHECKBOX DEFAULT space.
START-OF-SELECTION.
table IDOCSYN
SELECT * FROM idocsyn
INTO TABLE lt_idocsyn
WHERE idoctyp = idoc_typ.
READ TABLE lt_idocsyn INTO ls_idocsyn
WITH KEY idoctyp = idoc_typ
segtyp = idoc_seg.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
MOVE ls_idocsyn TO old_idocsyn.
ls_idocsyn-occmax = occmax.
IF upd_flag EQ 'X'.
UPDATE idocsyn FROM ls_idocsyn.
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
WRITE: 'Table IDOCSYN updated',
/,' Idoctype: ',idoc_typ,
/' segment number: ',ls_idocsyn-nr.
WRITE: /,'OCCMAX changed from',old_idocsyn-occmax,
' to ',ls_idocsyn-occmax.
ELSE.
WRITE: 'No UPDATE done in table IDOCSYN',
/,' Idoctype: ',idoc_typ,
/' segment number: ',ls_idocsyn-nr.
WRITE: /,'OCCMAX changed from',old_idocsyn-occmax,
' to ',ls_idocsyn-occmax.
ENDIF.
ELSE.
WRITE: 'no such record in table IDOCSYN'.
ENDIF.
ULINE.
table EDISYN
SELECT * FROM edisyn
INTO TABLE lt_edisyn
WHERE idoctyp = idoc_typ AND
cimtyp = space.
READ TABLE lt_edisyn INTO ls_edisyn
WITH KEY idoctyp = idoc_typ
cimtyp = space
segtyp = idoc_seg.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
MOVE ls_edisyn TO old_edisyn.
ls_edisyn-occmax = occmax.
IF upd_flag EQ 'X'.
UPDATE edisyn FROM ls_edisyn.
WRITE: 'Table EDISYN updated',
/,' Idoctype: ',idoc_typ,
/' segment number: ', ls_edisyn-posno.
WRITE: /,'OCCMAX changed from',old_edisyn-occmax,
' to ',ls_edisyn-occmax.
ELSE.
WRITE: 'No UPDATE done in table EDISYN',
/,' Idoctype: ',idoc_typ,
/' segment number: ',ls_idocsyn-nr.
WRITE: /,'OCCMAX changed from',old_idocsyn-occmax,
' to ',ls_idocsyn-occmax.
ENDIF.
ELSE.
WRITE: 'no such record in table EDISYN'.
ENDIF. -
Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound)
Hello,
I did an insert into idoc_data of segment E1TXTH8 (level 3 - as child of E1EDL20) and E1TXTP8 (level 4 as child of E1TXTH8).
inside user-exit ZXTRKU02.
But idoc is created with error 26 (and hierarchy is not respected! (WE05)).
Am I using the right user-exit or i miss something in the sequence while insert??
Error:
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment E1TXTH8 does not occur at the current level of the basic type DELVRY03 (extension ).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment E1TXTH8 is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment E1TXTH8 does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type DELVRY03 (extension ).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type DELVRY03 (extension ).
Thank you in advance for your help.
Edited by: Fakher Baklouti on Apr 9, 2010 7:12 PMHello Faker,
It depends on the previous available segment.
Here is the procedure,
1. Get all the segments from the database table IDOCSYN where basic type is DELVRY03
2. Sort them by Sequential number in DESCENDING
3. Get the Index (say GV_INDEX) of the segment in IDOCSYN which you want to insert or edit
4. LOOP internal table of IDOCSYN from index GV_INDEX and check for the availability of the segment of IDOCSYN in idoc data
5. If it is success, break the loop and now you got the previous available segment
6. Now just insert your segment in the idoc table just after it. -
Idoc outbound errors05(error during translation) 07(error during syntax ch)
hi,
i found all idocs in the system fails with status 07(error during syntax check)
idoc got different stats:
flow of status:01
30
03
18
24
05 (error during translation)
07 (error during syntax check)
what could be the problem ?Hi,
This could be the format which you are sending not matching with other system.
For example, if your are sending the Idocs to EDI, system, the mapping should be correct with the idoc which you have are sending. If haven't changed any posting program logic or idoc segments, then check with other system who is supposed to transmit the idocs.
Regards,
Ashok -
No syntax error on syntax check, but syntax error on activation
Hi all,
I have a confusing problem.
I want to default some values on item level of purchase order (ME21N). I added a module call in flow logic of screen 1313 of program SAPLMEGUI. The module itself I added to include LMEVIEWSF01. Here I default some fields of structure MEPO1313. This structure is defined in TOP-include using TABLES.
Before modification I debugged the transaction and found out, that structure MEPO1313 is accessible during PBO. Changes in debugger are shown as expected on screen.
Now, syntax check on LMEVIEWSF01 and even on SAPLMEGUI returns no error. But on activation I get syntax error saying MEPO1313 is not know ??
So, structure MEPO1313 is accessible in debugger, no syntax error on syntax-check, but syntax error on activation ?
What is going on ??
Elkogo to SE80 and Check syantax at package level.
you might be checking syantax for other include and problem si somw ehere else, justa thought. -
Hi,
We are developing a report, where we have written the following piece of code:
LOOP AT lt_kondd2.
DO.
If lv_first = "X". "1
READ TABLE lt_kotd2 WITH KEY knumh = lt_kondd2-knumh.
Else. "1
READ TABLE lt_kotd2 WITH KEY knumh = lv_smatn.
Endif.
Some Statements.
Enddo.
Some statements
Endloop.
During syntax check the above code is giving the following error:
Field "READ" is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement.
Please help point out what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Peter>
Peter Grosvenor wrote:
>
If lv_first = "X". "1
You are using double quotes (") rather than single quotes (').
Next time, do more desk checking before posting here.
Rob -
Can not Update icloud for win7 Gets
Sheep error during transformation. check that the indicated transmitter propagating path is valid.
tryet in appel updater and tryet downloading from apple but the sameHi,
Found a note explaining the significance of these errors.
It says:
"NZE-28862: SSL connection failed
Cause: This error occurred because the peer closed the connection.
Action: Enable Oracle Net tracing on both sides and examine the trace output. Contact Oracle Customer support with the trace output."
For further details you may refer the Note: 244527.1 - Explanation of "SSL call to NZ function nzos_Handshake failed" error codes
Thanks & Regards,
Sindhiya V. -
Adhoc Query : Error during selection; check the selection conditions
Hi
We have a report set-up and which we want to run using our adhoc query report tcode S_PH0_48000513
The report, has a few different selection criteria in it to look at all action IT screen data in the system for ee's in specific personnel areas. There is also a criteria to allow us to paste in specific employee numbers we are interested in. The issue I am facing is that over about 3000 ids, the system automatically returns me a message when I click on the Output button to run the report which states:
Error during selection; check the selection conditions
Message no. PAIS206
I am not sure why this is happening. The selection criteria are fine and the other day I ran the report and I experienced no issues. The report ran successfully. Now though, if I try and paste in all the ids I am interested in (about 8000) I get this message straightaway.
Can anything be done to overcome this issue?
Any advice would be much appreciated.
NicolaHi
The message in full is:
Error during selection; check the selection conditions
Message no. PAIS206
Diagnosis
A runtime error occurred during dynamic selection.
System response
The runtime error will be caught; no short dump will be created. This error should not occur as a rule. However, very large select statements may trigger the runtime error SAPSQL_STMNT_TOO_LARGE or DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL. There is no way to prevent this happening. In this case, the error can only be caught.
Procedure
Check the selection conditions to see whether the error was caused because the option "Import from text file" included too many objects in the "Multiple selection" dialog. If this is so, you must limit the number of individual values. -
Tp error during EHPI checks NTCHK phase
Hi,
We are running the EHPI and recieve the following error during the Checks phase:
Severe error(s) occured in phase PREP_GENCHECKS/NTACT_CHK!
Last error code set: Process 'tp' exited with 12, see '/uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/log/TP.ECO' for details
Error during "tp ntaction"-call - check TP.ECO
TP.ECO=
SAPehpi> Starting subprocess 16165 at 20101007100438
ENV: DIR_LIBRARY=/uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/exenew
ENV: JAVA_HOME=/opt/java1.4
ENV: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/exenew:/uexports/DV1/EHPI/jvm/jre/lib/ia64/server:/uexports/DV1/EHPI/jvm/jre/
lib/ia64:/uexports/DV1/EHPI/jvm/jre/../lib/ia64
ENV: NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.UTF8
ENV: ORACLE_BASE=/oracle
ENV: ORACLE_HOME=/oracle/DV1/102_64
ENV: ORACLE_SID=DV1
ENV: PATH=/uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/exenew:/opt/java1.4/bin:/oracle/DV1/102_64/bin:.:/home/dv1adm:/usr/sap/DV1/SYS/exe/run:/
usr/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/contrib/bin:/usr/contrib/Q4/bin:/opt/perl/bin:/opt/hparray/bin:/opt/nettladm/bin:/opt/fcms/bin:/
usr/contrib/kwdb/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/opt/graphics/common/bin:/opt/upgrade/bin:/opt/ipf/bin:/opt/resmon/bin:/opt/perf/bin:/op
t/wbem/bin:/opt/wbem/sbin:/opt/prm/bin:/opt/sec_mgmt/bastille/bin:/opt/dsau/bin:/opt/dsau/sbin:/opt/gnome/bin:/opt/ignite/
bin:/opt/sec_mgmt/spc/bin:/opt/ssh/bin:/opt/hpsmh/bin:/opt/wlm/bin:/opt/hpnpl//bin:/usr/contrib/bin/X11:/opt/sfm/bin:/opt/
mozilla:/opt/perl_32/bin:/opt/perl_64/bin:/opt/swa/bin:/oa/cdirect/ndm/bin:.
ENV: SAPSYSTEMNAME=DV1
ENV: auth_shadow_upgrade=0
ENV: dbms_type=ORA
ENV: dbs_ora_schema=SAPR3
ENV: dbs_ora_tnsname=DV1
EXECUTING /uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/exenew/tp (/uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/exenew/tp) ntaction ntop=chkant DV1 pf=/uexports/DV1/
EHPI/abap/bin/DEFAULT.TPP srctt=DDNTT srctf=DDNTF dsttt=DDNTT dsttf=DDNTF intdel=YES -Dntact_timecmp=no protyear=40
initial value of NLS_LANG: 'AMERICAN_AMERICA.UTF8'
This is /uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/exenew/tp version 372.04.88 (release 701, unicode enabled)
Warning: Parameter INTERRUPT is no longer used.
Warning: unknown parameter MAX_SEMAPHORE_WAIT in parameter file (line 8).
Warning: Parameter DAYLIGHT_SHUTDOWN is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter WITH_TACOB is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter IMPDP_BY_EVENT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter INTERRUPT is no longer used.
Warning: unknown parameter MAX_SEMAPHORE_WAIT in parameter file (line 8).
Warning: Parameter DAYLIGHT_SHUTDOWN is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter WITH_TACOB is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter IMPDP_BY_EVENT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter DBCONFPATH is no longer used.
tp finished with return code: 12
meaning:
A tool used by tp aborted
Process with ID 16165 terminated with status 12
NTCHK.LOG=
1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "NTACT_CHK" ("20101007100438")
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPR3
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=0
4 ETQ399 Set environment for standard connect:
4 ETQ399 ENV: dbs_ora_schema=SAPR3
4 ETQ399 ENV: auth_shadow_upgrade=0
4 ETQ399 Set RFC variables for standard connect:
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00'
4 ETQ399 Set tool parameters for standard connect:
4 ETQ399 default TPPARAM: DEFAULT.TPP
1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'PREP_GENCHECKS/NTACT_CHK'.
1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:
2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = 'CHKANT'
2 ETQ399 Arg[1] = 'DDNTT'
2 ETQ399 Arg[2] = 'DDNTF'
2 ETQ399 Arg[3] = 'DDNTT'
2 ETQ399 Arg[4] = 'DDNTF'
2 ETQ399 Arg[5] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[6] = 'NOBUFRESET'
2 ETQ399 Arg[7] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[8] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[9] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[10] = 'NTCHK.ELG'
4 ETQ380 computing toolpath for request "TP_NTACTION_SHD"
4 ETQ381 request "TP_NTACTION_SHD" means "tp ntact for shadow tables"
4 ETQ382 translates to group "R3UP_TOOL_GROUP_SHDNEW"
4 ETQ383 translates to path "exenew"
4 ETQ383 translates to path "exe"
2 ETQ399 Checking of nametabs ...
4 ETQ399 2010/10/07 10:04:38: put_execute: (tp) forkpid:16165
It doesn't even get to the point of creating NTCHK.ELG
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 287923 Oct 7 10:19 SAPehpichk.log
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 13144 Oct 7 10:19 TROUBLE_SAVELOGS.LOG
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 151957 Oct 7 10:19 SAPehpi_troubleticket_logs.sar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dv1adm sapsys 10039 Oct 7 10:19 SLOG700
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dv1adm sapsys 80609 Oct 7 10:19 ALOG700
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 9238 Oct 7 10:19 TP.ECO
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 1729 Oct 7 10:19 SAPehpi_troubleticket.log
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dv1adm sapsys 112988412 Oct 7 10:19 PN401007.DV1
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 1292 Oct 7 10:05 NTCHK.LOG
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 57379 Oct 7 10:05 SAPehpiConsole.log
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dv1adm sapsys 148736 Oct 7 10:04 ULOG10_4
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 10692 Oct 7 10:04 SAPehpi.ECO
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 10581 Oct 7 10:04 NTCHK.SAV
takderp1:dv1adm 530> ll NT*
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 1292 Oct 7 10:05 NTCHK.LOG
-rw-rr 1 dv1adm sapsys 10581 Oct 7 10:04 NTCHK.SAV
SAPehpi_troubleticket.log=
This trouble ticket was created by SAPehpi on 20101007101947
SAPehpi broke during phase NTACT_CHK in module PREP_GENCHECKS / General checks
Error Message: Process 'tp' exited with 12, see '/uexports/DV1/EHPI/abap/log/TP.ECO' for details
Error during "tp ntaction"-call - check TP.ECO
Summary of SAPehpi:
SAPehpi Release: 7.10/1
SAPehpi Version: SAPehpi version 7.10/1
Start Release: 700
Target Release: 701
Summary of host system details:
SID: DV1
Host: takderp1
MS Host: takderp1
GW Host: takderp1
Start Path: /usr/sap/DV1/SYS/exe/run
Kernel Path: /usr/sap/DV1/SYS/exe/run
Summary of operating system details:
OS Type: HP-UX IA64
OS Version: 11.23
Summary of database details:
Database Type: ora
Database Version: 10.2.0.2.0
Summary of RFC details:
Host: takderp1
GW Host: takderp1
Client: 000
Destination: DV1
Language:
System No.: 00
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
JimHi Eric,
I have the log posted above but here is an excert from the TP.ECO log.
Warning: Parameter INTERRUPT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter DAYLIGHT_SHUTDOWN is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter WITH_TACOB is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter IMPDP_BY_EVENT is no longer used.
Warning: Parameter DBCONFPATH is no longer used.
tp finished with return code: 12
meaning:
A tool used by tp aborted
Process with ID 22858 terminated with status 12
Regards,
JIm -
Error during availability check for order
Hi PM experts,
How can I make below warning message (W) to an error message (E)?
Message no: CO820 (Error during availability check for order)
Regards,
Nizam
PM ConsultantHi,
you can cantrol not to release maint orders in case if parts are missing by OIOI transaction, here under Material Availability against Release material you maintain option 3 No release if parts are missing. This way you can achieve this. If there are other components which has stock on Maint order then delete the un-available material from maint order then it will allow you to release the order.
Hope availability check rule is maintained on material master.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
N.Nagaraju -
ERRORS during NAMETAB CHECK in checks phase of EHP Inst.
Hi SDNers,
I'm implementing SAP Enhancement Package 4 for ECC6 system (ABAP).I started the application and it gets through the checks phase ok, except errors during the GENCHECKS/NTACT_CHK TEXT .
I logged on se11 but I could not able to see Runtime Object .
See below error message:
%BEGIN PREP_GENCHECKS/NTACT_CHK TEXT
ERROR> *** ERRORS during NAMETAB CHECK found ***
Analyze the logfile NTCHK.ELG to determine
the nametab, that caused the error.
Call transaction se11 for the corresponding
DDIC object. Choose menu Utilities -> Runtime Object -> Check
If you repeat the phase and there is still an error,
see also note Nr. 179334 for additional information
+++++++++++++ Content of NTCHK.ELG +++++++
1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "NTACT_CHK" ("20100309081807")
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPR3
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=<null>
4 ETQ399 Set environment for standard connect:
4 ETQ399 ENV: dbs_ora_schema=SAPR3
4 ETQ399 ENV: auth_shadow_upgrade=0
4 ETQ399 Set RFC variables for standard connect:
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00'
4 ETQ399 Set tool parameters for standard connect:
4 ETQ399 default TPPARAM: DEFAULT.TPP
1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'PREP_GENCHECKS/NTACT_CHK'.
1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:
2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = 'CHKANT'
2 ETQ399 Arg[1] = 'DDNTT'
2 ETQ399 Arg[2] = 'DDNTF'
2 ETQ399 Arg[3] = 'DDNTT'
2 ETQ399 Arg[4] = 'DDNTF'
2 ETQ399 Arg[5] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[6] = 'NOBUFRESET'
2 ETQ399 Arg[7] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[8] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[9] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[10] = 'NTCHK.ELG'
4 ETQ380 computing toolpath for request "TP_NTACTION_SHD"
4 ETQ381 request "TP_NTACTION_SHD" means "tp ntact for shadow tables"
4 ETQ382 translates to group "R3UP_TOOL_GROUP_SHDNEW"
4 ETQ383 translates to path "exenew"
4 ETQ383 translates to path "exe"
2 ETQ399 Checking of nametabs ...
4 ETQ399 2010/03/09 08:18:07: put_execute: (tp) forkpid:1175614
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20100309090358
Has anyone encountered anything similar? Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Faris AL-Saweedhi Niraij,
below more details of SAPehpi_troubleticket.log
This trouble ticket was created by SAPehpi on 20100310093046
SAPehpi broke during phase NTACT_CHK in module PREP_GENCHECKS / General checks
Error Message: No lines found in logfile matching 'PN......\.EQA'
Summary of SAPehpi:
SAPehpi Release: 7.10/1
SAPehpi Version: SAPehpi version 7.10/1
Start Release: 700
Target Release: 701
Summary of host system details:
SID: EQA
Host: wmdsapeqa
MS Host: wmdsapeqa
GW Host: wmdsapeqa
Start Path: /usr/sap/EQA/DVEBMGS00/exe
Kernel Path: /usr/sap/EQA/DVEBMGS00/exe
Summary of operating system details:
OS Type: AIX
OS Version: 5.2.0
Summary of database details:
Database Type: ora
Database Version: 10.2.0.4.0
Summary of RFC details:
Host: wmdsapeqa
GW Host: wmdsapeqa
Client: 000
Destination: EQA
Language:
System No.: 00
regards,
Faris
Edited by: Faris Solaiman Saweed on Mar 10, 2010 8:07 AM -
Getting Error 26 in ALE IDOC scenario .- EDI Syntax Check Error...
Hi..
i am working in ALE Idoc scenario...I am getting Status 3 as well as status 26 in we02 transaction in my custom IDOC scenario for outbound process..
The error is 'EDI- SYntax Check'..
How to remove this error..
Pls help.ya, there is only one segment available in IDOC..named i.e zseg_a .
So , error in postion is avoided..
How to find syntax error then? -
Idoc Error - EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Hi All,
have created a new reduced message type for our new vendor A/C group through BD53. Also done reqd config for sending the vendor master through this message type. .
I have created couple of vendors for testing with X01 with withholding tax functionality and when try to send these vendors , Idocs are getting failed .
When I create vendor without withholding tax functionality , idoc is getting posted succesfully . If create vendor with entries in the feild whih are related to withholding tax . Idocs are getting failed .
If I see the status in WE05 ,Idocs which are posted succefully are showing the basic type as CREMAS03 . For idocs which are getting failed have the basic type as CREMAS04 and also the extension as Z1CREMAS . I don`t understand why the system is defaulting CREMA04 & Z1CREMAS when I send the vendor master with withholding tax feild entries.
I am not much familiar with ALE /Idoc set up. Please can any body help me to resolve the issue.
The error message in we05 as below
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment Z1LFA1M does not occur at the current level of the basic type CREMAS04 (extension Z1CREMAS).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment Z1LFA1M is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment Z1LFA1M does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type CREMAS04 (extension Z1CREMAS).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type CREMAS04 (extension Z1CREMAS).
ThanksHi,
I don`t understand what do you mean release after adding segment.
Message type works i.e. Idoc get posted if I send with the vendor w/o withholding tax field entries. Idoc fails when send vendor with withholding tax field entry.
Regards -
Idoc, error during dispatch
Hi,
How can we correct idocs in staus 11 ie error during dispatch. What can be the reason behind the error? How can i check that?
Thanks in advance.Hi,
ALEFailureCode 11
An IDoc that is not successfully sent to the endpoint is considered a failure and the IDoc status is updated by the adapter to 11
try to reprocess the idoc in BD87.
Prabhudas
Maybe you are looking for
-
adobe photoshop elements 4 cd is not working on my new computer can not install the programm what to do? Message was edited by: Pat Willener - removed serial number.
-
Qosmio G20 - How to install with one single HDD and without RAID?
I want to set up Qosimo G20 new with Windows XP 32. I bought a new harddisk and put it into slot 1. I would like to run it without any RAID (so slot 2 is empty) XP installation CD did not discover the HD I entered BIOS to see if the HD was there - Th
-
Can I set PS Elements 11 as an export plug-in in LR5? Have tried using the LR5 Plug-In Manager which shows an error each time I try
-
What is the right product for the electronic form?
I need your help to choose an Adobe product. I need a product that I create an electronic form as a purchase order and when necessary, open the source file, fill the fields and saved in electronic format with the fields filled. What Adobe product doe
-
Hi All, I need a help on JList. I just want to print all contents of JList. Can anyone give me suggestion or any sample code on this?. JList may have maximum of 1000 Lines. I need to keep it in mind about line wrapping and multiple pages printing.