Idoc error mapping error for segment "E1EDT13 006" in DESADV idoc

Hi SAP Gurus,
DESADV IDOC for few articles is not getting passed from SAP to legacy system. It is missing one segment"E1EDT13 006" for goods issue.
Why is this mapping error happening. How can this be resolved.
Regards.
Sumi

Hi Nsangle/SAP gurus,
Thanks for that. But, I have already compared the failing idoc with the successful one. It's the segment E1EDT13 006 missing in the wrong idoc. I have already added that idoc and reprocessed it.
But, I wanted to know why such kind of idoc segment missing/ mapping error happens.
Regards.
Sumi

Similar Messages

List of Qualifiers for Segment E1EDT13?

Hi,
in my iDoc XML I have six E1EDT13 Segments with different qualifiers and I want to know what they stands for. Could anyone tell more about these qualifiers?
Here my xml snippet:
<E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
               <QUALF>006</QUALF>
                    <NTANF>20070919</NTANF>
                    <NTANZ>094017</NTANZ>
                    <NTEND>20070919</NTEND>
                    <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
                    <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
                    <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
                    <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
                    <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
               </E1EDT13>
               <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
                    <QUALF>003</QUALF>
                    <NTANF>20070919</NTANF>
                    <NTANZ>094017</NTANZ>
                    <NTEND>20070919</NTEND>
                    <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
                    <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
                    <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
                    <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
                    <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
               </E1EDT13>
               <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
                    <QUALF>001</QUALF>
                    <NTANF>20070919</NTANF>
                    <NTANZ>094017</NTANZ>
                    <NTEND>20070919</NTEND>
                    <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
                    <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
                    <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
                    <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
                    <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
               </E1EDT13>
               <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
                    <QUALF>007</QUALF>
                    <NTANF>20070920</NTANF>
                    <NTANZ>094017</NTANZ>
                    <NTEND>20070920</NTEND>
                    <NTENZ>094017</NTENZ>
                    <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
                    <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
                    <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
                    <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
               </E1EDT13>
               <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
                    <QUALF>010</QUALF>
                    <NTANF>20070919</NTANF>
                    <NTANZ>094017</NTANZ>
                    <NTEND>20070919</NTEND>
                    <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
                    <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
                    <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
                    <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
                    <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
               </E1EDT13>
               <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
                    <QUALF>015</QUALF>
                    <NTANF>20070924</NTANF>
                    <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
                    <NTEND>20070924</NTEND>
                    <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
                    <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
                    <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
                    <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
                    <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
               </E1EDT13>
Thnx

Has this question been answered? I have looked everywhere is WE60 and I cannot find find anything that tells what all the qualifiers mean. I have the exact same problem, except with Segment E1EDK14.

Seeburger help required for 850, 810, Dispatch Advice (DESADV IDOC)

Hi All,
Pls let me know for below 4 points:
1. Please let me know blogs which clearly shows settings for Seeburger components for 850 or 810.
--- Seeburger Workbench
--- Seeburger Mapping Designer (BIC)
--- Seeburger Counter and Varaibles
--- Seeburger AS2 Spoke
--- Any other Seeburger Component setting required
I have understand blog for 850 -- /people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/08/05/wanna-implement-seeburger-for-edi-find-the-booster
2. Anybody has blog for 810 or Dispatch Advice (IDOC type DESADV).
3. Can anybody provide me Mapping Logic (at field level) done in XI/PI for 850, 810 , Dispatch Advice (IDOC type DESADV) .
4. I have heard that Seeburger now provides standard mappings for PI/XI for 850, 810 , DESADV etc. so we do not require to do mappings in PI/XI now as it is already done. Any one knows about it.
Regards

> Pls let me know for below 4 points:
>
> 1. Please let me know blogs which clearly shows settings for Seeburger components for 850 or 810.
> --- Seeburger Workbench
> --- Seeburger Mapping Designer (BIC)
> --- Seeburger Counter and Varaibles
> --- Seeburger AS2 Spoke
> --- Any other Seeburger Component setting required
Hello Rickk,
There is no blog for the 810 scenario ...
you need to configure the partner related stuff in seeburger workbench if it is inbound only like 850,852,860..
not for outbound like 810,856...i.e no need to configure the partner data in seeburger workbench for this..
You need to look for developing mappings if EDI message is other than Version 4010 by default there are mappings available for
810,856,850,997..if your edi messages are other than this then you need to look for BIC tool for developing mappings.
There is no need to set anything for counter and varaibles
..no idea about AS2 spoke,,,
Apart from thjis no need to do anythings in seeburger ...
HTH
Rajesh

IDoc status 51 - LSMW for Creating Purchasing Info Records using IDoc meth

Dear All,
My req is to create a Conversion for Purchasing Info Records. LSMW's IDoc method is used to develop this conversion wherein Message Type "INFREC" and Basic Type "INFRECMASS01" are being used.
In the 14th step (Start IDoc Processing), I 'am getting the IDoc status "51" and Status Text "Application document not posted". If I double click on respective IDoc number, I got its Control record, Data records, and Status records; in the status records I can see "51" in Red color with the message "Function module not allowed: IDOC_INPUT_INFREC". If I double click on this it asks me to check the process code...
Request you guys to resolve the issue....
Solution will b rewarded.. Thanks in advance....

U should use basic type INFREC01 instead of NFRECMASS01.
Within the FM there is a check for basic type like:
check idoc type
    if f_idoc_control-idoctp <> c_idoctp_infrec01. " INFREC01
      raise wrong_function_called.
    endif.
Edited by: Joyjit Ghosh on Sep 15, 2008 4:57 PM

IDOC Mapping ; Error CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING

After we transfered an IDoc 1:1, w/o mapping, successfully from one to another SAP system, we added a mapping like follows:
1. created a message mapping per drag&drop from imported objects - IDocs, using a 1:1 mapping (no field changes, just for testing purposes)
2. created an interface mapping using that message mapping.
3. after activating in repository, we added that interface mapping in interface determination in configured inbound-interfaces.
After starting a test data transfer we received the error message
"CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING Programm: CL_XMS_MAIN===================CP, Include CL_XMS_MAIN===================CM00A, line: 535"
And an odd error id with strange crosses in the overview.
Did we forget something? Any hint is welcome.

@Sridhar: Thanks for the hint, but unfortunately it did not change anything. Do you think it has something to do with cached information?
@Bill: Yes, we test it in the IB Repository using the mapping tool. The mapping is very simpel each field from the source IDoc is mapped to the same field in the target IDoc.
Maybe the problem ist because of the different SAP releases (we send from an 4.6C to an 4.7) ?

Mapping Error: Mappings are not required for this Integrator

Hi,
when I created my upload integrator with the Desktop Integrator Manager (12.1.2) I am not able to attach a mapping to it. I get the following error:
Mapping Error: Mappings are not required for this Integrator because the ability to download information has not been enabled.
Does anyone know what I've missed?
cheers
Jeroen

Hi ,
Without creating the content if you are trying to do mapping this error will come.
Solution:
Create the content and then do mapping..
Regards,
Sreekanth.S
Edited by: user12045904 on Dec 9, 2010 10:55 PM

Mapping of multiple segments of Idoc HRMD_A06 to flat file

Hi Experts,
           I am doing an Idoc to file scenario. Idoc i am using is HRMD_A06, which is having around 38 segments, contains the hiring action details of multilpe employees (Infotypes 0000,0001,0002,0003,0302,1001).
          When i have send the idoc , I am getting the file in the destination path, but having only one line which is having the the details of first employee.
          As the segments are repeating my mapping is not proper. Can anyone please help me with some details for mapping Idoc to file, when the segments repeats in a single idoc.
         Please also give me the details regarding the destination message interface.

Hi
Please go through below link,
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
Its very simple to do some changes in your existing mapping and some occurance changes.
Verify that if your file message structure has 0..Unbounded Occurance.
Use 0..Unbounded and map accordingly to target structure with 0...unbounded..
and test with sample xml in message mapping with multiple idocs data and see whther u get multiple records in target
Also if you need each sengment on new line with FCC then refer below links
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/02/file-receiver-with-content-conversion
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Jan 24, 2008 10:09 AM
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Jan 24, 2008 10:09 AM

Mapping Error- In IDoc to File scenario

Hi Experts,
Got the Mapping error for one interface (IDoc to file). After comparing with successful message found that the field value (TDLINE) is not availbale in first segment (E1EDT10) in idoc for this failed one.
Mapping is :
TDLINE -- Exists --- Creatif --- Receiver field(in the file)
But here due to the the empty value in first segment the message is failed in XI system, next segment values is not trasmitted to the recever end(maping is the same above). To overcome this issue please suggest the suitable mapping design in IR.
Regards
Mahesh

Hi,
After your CreateIf, use a "IfWithoutElse" by selecting the properties "Keep SUPPRESS Values". To do that, do a right click on IfWithoutElse, choose "Properties".
With this option, you will keep the fact that you have nothing in the source, and so the target context will have a "SUPPRESS" line. I have not THE solution, so do your own test.
If it's not enough, see also about the "mapWithDefault" (but that depends of your real rule).
Regards.
Mickael

MAPPING ERROR with IDOC

Hi Friends,
I am working on IDOC to JDBC scenario. Here i am using DEBMAS06 IDOC . when i tried to trigger an IDOC from BD12 T code its triggering an idoc but when i see it in MONI of XI, its giving mapping error. when i test my mapping program its executing successfully. even i tried to execute with the incoming data in the sxmb_moni, i mean that i filles my mapping test with the same data coming into MONI by filling all the segments coming into XI its executing successfully in mapping test.
but when i tried to trigger an idoc from we19 or from bd54 i am facing this error. can any one please let me know what else i can do for running this scenario. let me know your comments.
Thanks
Ramana.

Hi friends, I am getting the following error. On the sender side we dont need to take care of the structure because we will be importing the IDOC from the application system directly. on the receiver side i have created the structure for the data base. the mapping is running fine in my mapping test. still i am not getting what else i need to do. please comment on this.
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_MessageMapping_</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MessageMapping_: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

How to isolate error with a record/segment in IDOC with multiple records

I have an IDOC with multiple records/segments (typically 1000 records/segments). Sometime XI can not process the IDOC because of some control characters in data.
1. How can I pre-processed the IDOC to remove those control characters?
Can I use XPATH expression/Java class to do it? How can I configure the XPATH expression/Java class in XI to pre-process the file?
2. Until I have answer to 1st question. I would like to find out the error is exactly for which record? What configuration can I do in XI to isolate the error is with which record/segment in IDOC?
Thanks in advance.

Split the IDoc.
with in the UDF, after the validations if every thing fine, pass as successful records to success_MT and pass it to target system using Branching in BPM.
if errors found in the record, then store the error records in Hash table with in UDF, get the IDoc number, frame as a string and raise alert.
U have to do this in the context of IDoc.
If U wanna get the IDoc Number, Segment Name and field name for every failure, U can pass the expected error field name as constant to UDF, frame the sentence in the UDF like -> <b>IDoc 1234321 segment SEG001 field FLD03 has a special character *</b>.
If U wanna pass this string to source/target, U can do in error messages branch in BPM.
U must use BPM for splitting the IDoc, since it is multi-mapping.
reg.,
Yallabandi.

Mapping Error - IDoc

I get the following runtime exception in XI Monitor when mapping flat file data to ORDERS05 IDoc.
<b>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ORDERS05. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start</b>
I've checked the following so far:
1) Succesfully tested the test data instance in Design.
2) Disabled the EDI_DC40 segment
3) Verified the sender and receiver agreements
4) Verified the data against the XSDs
Is there anything else I can check that indicates what is wrong?

Error can be due two scenarios.
1.Is message mapping tested for the sample data in the integration repository?If not please test the message mapping in the Mapping Objects->messaging mapping of the Integration Repository.If the error is thrown in the test envirnonment of the integration repository then your target field mapping is not correct.The error might be either due to non-mapping of Mandatory elements in the target structure or nodes in the target structure are not assigned to empty constants(If the elements in any node is mandaory then the node needs to be explicitly initiated by mapping it to an empty constant).
2.If the mapping is successful in the integration repository check in the integration directory if the "Apply control record values from payload" Checkbox in the Idoc Reciever Adapter deselected?(Integration Directory).

Mapping Error in XI Configuration for MM-SUS Scenario

Dear Experts,
I am working on MM-SUS Classic Scenario,
We have done all basic setting in SRM, ECC and SUS.
Now we are configuring XI Scenario(Working on ESOA Architecture), while configuring XI Scenario, I follow the mention steps :
I have started from Integration Builder in XI (using T-code SXMB_IFR)
1. I have assigned two Business System( for ECC and SUS) In integration Builder (Creates Communication Channels Automatically) .
2. Modify IDOC and XI Communication in ERP and SUS Business system respectively.
3. Now select Tools -> Transer Integration Scenario from Inegration Repository and Create Scenario in it properly
(Included Assign Services, Configure Connections, Generate etc).
4. In last, save scenario.
After configuration XI I am not getting Scenario Data (Objects and Configuration Overview data) in it.
When i click to Check Configurability under Model Configurator of mine Scenario, I found following Errors ( I am Mentioning only some errors) :
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from Send Z_CREMAS_SUSMM to Business Partner empfangen has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from Send_PO_From_MM to Receive_Purchase_Order has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmationRequest to ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmationCreate has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from InvoiceRequest senden to Receive INVOIC has no mapping
Kindly correct me if am missing some, and help me out, what should have been done to remove this mapping errors.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani

If you are on >= SP9 you do not need to perform that action at all.
Go to SU01 transaction assign SAP_XI_DEVELOPER role for the desired users and try it.
regards
Shravan

IDOC Serialization(EOIO) using IDOC Adapter throwing Mapping error

Hello SDN Gurus,
The scenario I am working on is IDOC(PAYEXT & EUPEXR) --> XI (ABAP Mapping) --> Flat File (IDOC Structure).
The IDOCS produced in Appl system may be in the following order
PAYEXT
PAYEXT
EUPEXR
PAYEXT
PAYEXT
PAYEXT
EUPEXR
I need them to be processed in the same order into flat file.
The scenario is working good except for the serialization. So I did the following
Created two entries in IDXQUEUE one for each message type with the same Queue name in XI system.
Created a new rule for the queue and an associated function module. Used this rule in partner profile for both the message types. I used the following link to create the above two steps.
/people/community.user/blog/2006/11/04/how-to-serialize-idoc-xml-messages-fed-into-xi
The SAP system in based on WAS 6.4.
I can see the queue name & EOIO in the inbound message header.
I am getting a mapping error in ABAP program. If I inactivate the queue(in Appl system SAP ECC), I don't get any error.
Does anybody had this problem earlier? Please advice.
Thanks
Srini Vaidyam

I found an OSS note to resolve my issue. The note number is 1057573.
Whenever the queue is activated, the sender system will not send the <TABNAM> field value in EDI_DC40 structure. This note addresses this problem.
I found out this by comparing the results from SXI_MAPPING_TEST individually for the message that failed after queue is activated and the message that was successful if the queue is inactivated.
Only thing I noticed now is even if you selected the radio button "Trasfer Immediately" in Partner profile of Appl. system, the messages are not sent. They are getting collected. So we need to manually push them out using WE14.
This forum Rocks.
Thanks.
Srini Vaidyam

Error : IDoc XML data record: In segment attribute occurred instead of SEGM

hi friends
i am doing the file to idoc scenario. in message mapping i had done the static test. but what ever the fields i mapped in the idoc it was not populated in the idoc. and i am getting the error as
error :IDoc XML data record: In segment attribute occurred instead of SEGMENT
can any one solve the problem please
thanks in advance
Vasu

Hi Vasudeva,
Pls do check the nodes which you have mapped to. Also make sure that your SEGMENT field in the target structure is mapped properly.
Cheers
JK

Error : idoc xml data record : in segment attribute instead of SEGMENT

hi all
i am doing the file to idoc scenario. in that i am getting the error
error : IDOC XML Data record : In segment attribute instead of SEGMENT
i am doing this scenario since 4 days.
can anyone help me
thanks a lot
Vasu

in ref. to my post in your earlier thread.
>>>>
in your mapping check, in your IDOC if Begin , segment etc are mapped to a constant say '1'.
Also ref: In segment IDOC attribute I occurred instead of SEGMENT

Idoc error mapping error for segment "E1EDT13 006" in DESADV idoc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for