IDOC:inbound scenario for posting Message type ORDRSP

Hi All,
I am doing a inbound scenraio to post message type ORDRSP.
Acknowledgement gets created in Purchase order successfully but texts at header level and item level are not getting updated in the purchase order
I am using the segment E1EDKT1 and E1EDKT2 for header texts . For item texts I am using the segments E1EDPT1 and E1EDPT2.
Any pointers to this is appreciable.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Depending on whether the Order is a third party order are not, the texts are picked up from either SO or PO.
Put a break point on line 842 in the Include LEINMF11 and debug, this should help you get to the root cause of the issue.
Regards,
Chen

Similar Messages

IDOC Segment missing for MATMASS Message type

Through change pointer program for the message type YAUIHUBMATMAS IDOC is triggered.
1) Change pointers are defined in system for the message type T Code u2013 BD52.
2) If respective field is changed in material master , this data is stored in change pointers table BDCP.
3) Background jobs are scheduled every day, which searches for the changes pointer table and triggers the idoc.
In our case IDOC is getting generated but with one segment missing.
We have analysed the succesful and failed IDOC and found desrepency is field updation of BDCP table.
Succesful case contain material number in object value of ZZMDST field where as failed contain some other value.
Can anyone please help us to guide how the BDCP table is updated and the values are mapped in it or any other suggestion to find why the segment is missing in it.
Regards,
Roshni.

Jürgen L. wrote:
> I have never seen a YAUIHUBMATMAS IDOC, nor a ZZMDST field .
> This seems to be home made.
>
> You are expecting that standard SAP programs are generating change pointers for your z-fields?
> Do you see a change history in material master for your z-field?
>
>
> follow the slution from this thread:
>
Yes ,This is a Z -field.
Change pointer is triggering the idoc fo this Z-field but in some cases one segment is missing .
This is z-field in the basic data view of material master.
Yes , we have checked the change history in material master for this field it is getting updated there in BDCP table as well but in BDCP table if this field is flagged then object value is not contain material number instead it contain some other number .
But in case of succesful IDOC the object value is same as material number.
Regards,
Roshni

Error monitoring through workflow for idoc with message type ORDRSP

Hi All,
Through WE19 I am trying to post a failed idoc ie idoc in 51 status for message type ORDRSP to check whether the event IDOCORDRSP-INPUTERROROCCURED event is triggering or not. Though the idoc is going into 51 status and partner profile is maintained I cannot find this event in SWEL. I checked in fm IDOC_INPUT_ORDRSP fm and found that workflow_result is 99999.
Can anybody tell me why the event is not getting triggered for the message type ORDRSP or where do I debug to find out what is going wrong. IDOC_INPUT_ORDRSP fm is getting called from BUS2012 'S method confirmfromORDRSP which is very strange.So I am not getting where do I debug.
Regards
Suchandra

Hi All,
Solved it by my self.. To trigger the event we need to populate the EDIDC control record in WE19 and press standard inbound button 'not test by inbound fm) and then the inputerroroccured event will trigger...
Regards
Suchandra

Workflow Ends in Error " No auth to send IDocs with message type ORDRSP"

Hello All,
I have created an RFC user with limited Authoprizations including WE* tciodes and a few ME* transactons for an ALE Set up. I want to make sure i would not be giving more authorizations (extensive) to this RFC user and assign Just required authorizations. So i started testing testing and the inbound IDOC ended in error with a message " No auth to send IDocs with message type ORDRSP" Message no. SR053. Is there any way to find out what is the missing authorization object for the User. Any inputs would be really apprecaited.
Br,
Sri

Hi !
Becaus alle this happens in beckgound, things are a bit difficult but solvable....
What you should do is a "Authority trace" ... as follows....:
- Go to the ST01
- Mark "Authorisation Check"
- Swich the trace on for your Workflow user
- Execute the Workflow until the error uccurs
- Go back to the ST01
- Press the "Analyze" button and see what error occurs
Dont forget to swicht the trace off... otherwise the tracefiles become realle BIG !
Regards
rainer
Some Reward poins would be nice if that helped....

Create 2 outbound Idocs for 1 message type

Hi Experts,
We are sending an outbound Idoc of message type DESADV. We would like to trigger 2 Idocs per Shipping Notification.
Could you please help?
Thanks,
Vitish.

Hello Vitish
Each output partner can have it's own output. Also for the same message type. Maybe the 2 DESADV IDOC's are sent to different partners or destinations. But even when not you still can define 2 different output partners for the message type. Then 2 outputs will be triggered for the same message type.
Regards Jack

Sales order idoc error only on ORDCHG message type (ORDERS01)

Hi. I am adding segment E1EDK04 to our sales order idocs in order to pass tax jurisdiction code to R3. When I create the order (message type ORDERS), I am extracting tax jurisdiction code from the idoc and I am adding it to the ship-to address screen via a BDC table within user exit include zxvedu04. The new order gets saved with the TXJCD, and this works fine.
I am now testing maintenance scenarios. For ORDCHG message types, I am inserting the TXJCD within user exit include ZXVDBU02. The idoc processor abends in 51 status with message:
"Control data in the IDoc E1EDK04 has been transferred. Check data".
If I walk the same status 51 idoc through BALE without changing anything, I see the TXJCD get posted to the order, and the order is saved correctly the second time.
Does this mean I need to add something additional to the idoc control data on an ORDCHG or something?
Thank you.
Brendan

I was not able to get any farther on this. It would seem that when the idoc is processed in the foreground, something is being populated that is not present when the idoc come across to R3...
The thing is, when I walk through the idoc in the forground, there are no errors that pop up. I can save the idoc after foreground processing and it moves into 53 status.
Thanks for any ideas that you might have on how to gather more infromation.

How to add custom infotype in ALE for HRMD_A message type

Hi Friends-
Pls help me for our req we are using HRMD_A Message Type for HR master data but now we need to add one custom infotype ( 9902 ) also in standard ALE filters for this message type how i can do that pls let me know ?
<<removed_by_moderator>>
Regards
Meeta & Glory
Edited by: Vijay Babu Dudla on Dec 14, 2008 11:38 PM

Hi
Thanks for your support,
Pls let me know which steps i should go ? my secanrio is inbound side only,
step 1 ) Define idoc extension for HRMD_A01 using WE30 transaction and define it in partner profiles
step 2) do i need to write some code in BADI also to update information for my custom infotype also if yes then where and which BADI pls let me know ? because already am working on one badi HRALE00INBOUND_IDOC for few validation for incoming data.
step 3 ) add this new custom infotype in my standard ALE filters.
Pls let me know if am mistaking some where or if i have to do some thing else ?
Regards
Meeta & Glory

IDoc Inbound Processing for CREMDM & DEBMDM

Hi experts,
I'd like to gather some feedback from you regarding the topic ERP IDoc Inbound Processing for CREMDM & DEBMDM. As you all know, there's currently no option to directly process CREMDM/DEBMDM IDocs in ERP. Currently you have to use PI for splitting the CREMDM/DEBMDM message into its related ADRMAS and CREMAS/DEBMAS IDocs.
My areas of interest are:
1) How satisfied are you with the current situation? Does the split work? Are there issues or problems in the current message handling? What are the Pro's and Con's from your point of view?
2) What would be the requirements for a CREMDM/DEBMDM handler? What would you expect? Maybe you have implemented something similar on project basis and could post some feedback?
One painpoint I'd see with a CREMDM/DEBMDM inbound is that you'll lose the IDoc Monitoring capabilities. The message split allows a single record tracing in the IDoc Monitor (as there is a 1:1 relation between IDocs and records). This changes for the mass processing. The monitor would display only the status of the IDoc and you'd need some other monitoring capabilities to check the results on record level. What are your thoughts about that? Is the monitoring important? Would the application log be a feasible solution for that challenge?
Additional comments are welcome, of course.
Best regards
Michael
PS: @ Matt, please contact me by mail. thanks.

Hello ,
Here are some other pain areas regarding the message split :
1. Complicated monitoring proess & reprocessing error idocs : We have to monitor ADRMAS & CREMAS or ADRMAS & DEBMAS during inbound processing. Also we could not find any best practices to reprocess error idocs. E.g. If ADRMAS fails & CREMAS succeeds what is the impact . Also the impact if it is reveresed. We know for sure that if CREMAS fails , vendor will not be created / updated. But we could not find specific pointers for ADRMAS failures.
2. It is a tedious process to link CREMAS with corresponding ADRMAS idoc specially when SAP maintains internal number range for vendors.
3 . The process is complicated if you are managing customer or vendor contact information with contact address . We could succesfully implement the integration but it took us a while to reach end-point.
4. Splitting really does not seem to support if ERP maintains internal number range.
5. Another major issue we observed is , if ADRMAS is under process & corresponding DEBMAS or CREMAS is posted , it fails raising the message that Account is locked. Default serialization does work in ERP system . But overlap of few microseconds also cause this error.
Hope this helps !!
Please let me know if you need any other specific details since we have used MDM - ECC integration using PI to its maximum extent .
Regards
Yogesh

RE:idoc inbound scenario "mapping issue"

Hi experts,
we r facing the problem in idoc inbound scenario, while to generate multiple idoc's.
we need to generate the idoc's based on two fields, Location_code and Date. If any of the field is changing we need to generate the new idoc.
below is the sender payload :
<row>
 <Date>20100111</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>1890.30</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001000</Location_Code>
 </row>
 <row>
 <Date>20100112</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>1890.30</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001000</Location_Code>
 </row>
 <row>
 <Date>20100112</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>1890.30</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001001</Location_Code>
 </row>
 <row>
 <Date>20100112</Date>
 <Sign>+</Sign>
 <Tender_Code>ZSHT</Tender_Code>
 <Tender_Amount>4532.32</Tender_Amount>
 <Location_Code>0000001001</Location_Code>
 </row>
for the above payload ,we need 3 idocs as below
idoc1:
Location_code>1000 Date->20100111
idoc2:
Location_code>1000 Date->20100112
idoc3:
Location_code>1001 Date->20100112
under the third idoc fourth row should get repeated.
at present we have the following mapping which is generating multiple idocs bsased on only location code, it's like
Location_code-->removecontext-->sort-->splitbyvalue(valuechange)-->collapsecontext--->idoc
rgds
selvam

Hi,
Thanks Suraj , logic has worked but there is a simple issue , LOCATION_Code is mapped with SNDRPRN and RCVPRN of the EDI_DC40 segment when i m execuiting the payload it throws error for the second idoc generated , when the LOCATION_CODE changes this should also get updated to that field. Mapping for SDNPRN has been done like this.
LOCATION_CODE --->removecontext-->|
 formatbyexample--->SNDRPRN
idoc mapping logic---------------->|
pl suggest...
rgds
selvam

Finding Process Code for a message Type

Hi,
Is there any way to find process code for a specific message type.
Message Type WFRESOURCE_CHANGEAVAILABILITY

Hi Swathi,
I have already mention the process codes that can be used for this message type. For your convenience i am also attaching th description ,which process code can be used when.
ABI_AIDN_IN     Auto- ID Idoc process
ED00                Display Idoc using work item
ED00_XML        Display idoc using work item (xml)
ED08                Forward idoc
ZABI_DLV_IN    Delivery advice ( AIDDESADV with DELVRY04)
Regards
Vinod

ALE-IDocs: Issue on COGRP1 & COGRP6 Message Types

Dear Experts,
I need to send the Cost center groups data and Profit Center groups data from one system to other, I had sent this for one time using the tcodes, from now on I need to send only the changed data, so configured the ALE for this.
I activated change pointers generally in BD61 and then activated change pointers for message types in BD50. Cost Center Group (COGRP1), Profit Center Group (COGRP6).
Why is RBDMIDOC program not showing any output when executed with standard message types COGRP1 and COGRP6 ?
It is working fine with other message types like MATMAS, DEBMAS, COSMAS, PRCMAS, CREMAS.
Tcode: BD59: Assignment of Object Type to Message
Tcode: WE30: Develop IDoc Types
Tcode: BD52: Change document items for message type
So, COGRP1 does not have assignment of all the segments that are displayed for the IDoc Type: COGRP01 in WE30. Do we need to assign all these segments and fields to the message type in BD59? If so, how to create this ALE Object Types and what are these table names and fields in BD52., any user exits kind of thing for populating the fields if we do this way?
I am really having trouble and great confusion with this.
I would really appreciate you if you could provide me an answer or a hint.
Thanks in advance for the time you spent on this.
RV

Hi,
You need to follow following steps for the activation of change pointer.
1) Enable change pointer globally (BD61)
2) Enable Change Pointers for a Message Type (BD50)
3) Specify the Fields for Which Change Pointers Are to Be Written (BD52).
BD59 is used to Assign Filter Object Type to IDoc Field. Then you can add filter while creating distribution model.This is used when you have to filter the Idoc at distribution stage. It has nothing to do with the change pointer technique.
In BD52 , you have to assign the change pointer object(this you can find using T.code SCDO), table name and field.In your case change doc object is ALESETS
Just make sure that you are making changes in Cost center groups data and Profit Center groups and then execute program RBDMIDOC.
Regards,
Monika

Need help for new message type for PO archiving

Hello All
I have configured new message type ZARR for PO archiving process. After configuring all the steps this condition is not getting picked to by itself. And after maintaing it manually it is giving red flag without any error message. Here I am listing all the step that I have followed for config. Please help me am I missing something or any parameter is wrong.
Steps for new Message Type for PO Archiving
1.     Defined new Table 513 Purch.Org./Plant.
2.     Defined new access sequence Z513 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 21
Table = 513
Description = Purch.Org./Plant
Requirement = 101
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3.     Maintain Output Type ZARR for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z513
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Program = FM06AEND
FORM Routine = CHANGE_FLAG
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = Print Out
Storage System
Storage Mode = Archive Only
Document Type = ARCHIVE
Mail Title and texts
Language = EN
Title = Archiving for Legal Requirement
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 1 (Print Out)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = ZJ_9H_MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = Print Out
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4.     Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 1
CType = ZARR
Name = Testing for Archivin
Short Text = New
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
Oprat. = 2
CType = ZARR
Name = Testing for Archivin
Short Text = Change
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5.     Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
Step = 100
Cntr = 1
CTyp = ZARR
Description = Testing for Archivin
Requirement = 101
6.     Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7.     Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZARR
Med = 1 (Printout)
Funct = VN
Name = Testing for Archivin
Name = Vendor
8.     Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Plant = 24
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 1 (Printout)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = HUL1
Storage Mode = Archiving only
Thanks
Ankit

the problem is the Exclusive = Yes indicator in the access sequence.
Your other message has this exclusive indicator as well.
so if the first message is found, then no other message wil be determined
to allow several messages in one PO, you must not set this exlusive indicator

Are there any standard Idocs or Bapis for posting the data into transaction

Hi,
Are there any standard Idocs or Bapis for posting the data into transactions ME42N and IK11?
Thank You.

Thank you.
Any idea of the other one?

Filter Infotypes based on Company Code for the Message Type HRMD_A

Hi,
I have a requirement to send different infotypes for different Company codes using the same distribution model for the message type HRMD_A.
Example :
For the BUKRS 2500 I need to send infotype 0000 ,0002,0006
For the BUKRS 2600 I need to send infotype 0000 ,0008,0009
It will be a great help for me if any one can guide me on that.
Regards,
Raka

Hi ,
Thanks for the reply.
I alredy have done that . But its not working.
Its working only for infotype 0001.
If the infotype is there in any of the filter groups, the data will be sent irrespective of the Com Code.
Regards,
Raka

Inbound Idoc for own Message type

Dear All,
I have created a message type for outbound and sent data to the Java System.But when distributing in BD64 inbound parameters are not getting created.
For inbound idoc if i am creating a new message type,How i can get data from external server and commit it in database.
We have to write any program as we do for outbound?
Another issue outbound idoc is in waiting status i have to process it in BD87.How i can sent it immediately and in partner profile, distributing in module view BD64 i have given Transfer IDoc Immediately.
PLZ reply ASAP.
Thanks & Regards,
Arun.

Dear rhea,
I want to receive the IDOC data for message type WPUUMS from a java server. Currently i am working on sample values for segments
E1WPU01
E1WPU02
E1WPU03
E1WPU04
E1WPU05
E1WXX01
I am facing problems in passing the correct values .
Its throwing a error message status 51.(Application document not posted) IDoc not fully processed.
can you help me with some dummy data for all the fields in the above segments.
reply ASAP
regards
arun

IDOC:inbound scenario for posting Message type ORDRSP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for