IDOC_INPUT_STPPOD not updating POD status

Hi fellow SDN people.
We are posting IDOC_INPUT_STPPOD with only the E1EDL20 segment filled.
The IDOC posts OK and PODAT and POTIM is updated in transaction VLPODA.
But the problem is that the POD Status is A (Relevant) and not C...
If we go to the transaction and "Confirm the Proof of Delivery" the flag is set to C, but we want this to happen in the IDOC. Does anyone have any suggestions on how we can achieve this? Do we need to fill any more segments in the IDOC?
Best Regards
Niklas

Sorry everyone.
If I had read the documentation a bit more carefully I would have noticed that I had to fill the E1EDL24 segment for all items to get the status change...
This solves the problem.
Best Regards
Niklas

Similar Messages

OOTB Approval Workflow on Custom List does not Update Approval Status

I have a custom list on which I've required content approval. I then created a workflow instance from the "Approval - SharePoint 2010" template. For this workflow I have selected "Update the approval status after the workflow
is completed (use this workflow to control content approval". When I approve the list item via the workflow task item the status of the item is not updated but stays at pending even though the
workflow shows "Completed" with the Outcome of "approved". Is this the expected behavior, i.e. does "Update the approval status after the workflow is completed (use this workflow to control content approval"
not work for custom lists? Does it work on any of the lists?

Hi Kalos1840,
If you check "Require Content Approval" setting, only the way above can update the approval status due to the approval status is for this approval workflow. As this approval workflow cannot achieve your demand, I recommend you un-check "Require Content Approval"
setting and create a custom workflow such as the OOTB Approval Workflow or SharePoint Designer workflow.
Here is the steps of a SharePoint Designer workflow:
1.Go to your custom list , click Create a Workflow in SharePoint Designer.
2.Add a “Start a task process” action in your workflow.
3.Click “these users” and Start a Task Process edit page will pop up.
4.In the Participants field, input your approvers based on the order of approval.
5.In the right of Participants field, select “Serial (one at a time)”.
Best Regards,
Eric
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

IPod 4th Gen not updating "played" status.

Hi, recently I'm having a problem with my Ipod touch 4th Gen. It works fine, plays music and videos normally, but it does not update the "last played" status, nor "last played date". This is a problem because I sync my videos based on "most recent not played", and I have some smartlists that make use of that statur or date too.
This happened once before I upgraded from iOS 5 to Six, but apparently was corrected; however, since I upgraded to iOS 6, none of my played items is being updated. Could it be because of the iOS upgrading, or maybe there is something else I'm missing?

iOS: Device not recognized in iTunes for Mac OS X
It will not show up in Finder/Spotlight search

CLEAN_REQREQ_UP not updating the status of all confirmations.

Hello All
We have scheduled the cleaner report as a job running every 2 minutes.
This job changes the status of the confirmations from 'Approved' to 'Transmit to backend system'.
However the job doesn't process a few confirmations randomly.
In such confirmations, the status remains as ' Approved'.
There is no issue for replication for such confirmations in the backend.
This happens on 30 % of all confirmations.
All these confirmations are coming from an interface and the following sequence occurs
1) MFG Batch user creates Confirmation in SRM
2) WF Batch user sets the status as Approved
3) Job Batch user( CLEAN_REQREQ_UP) updates the status to 'Transmit to Backend system'
I am trying to find out why the job wont process these confirmations.
Regards
Kedar

HI
for eg,
when we do confirmations in SRM
message type MBGMCR and RFC takes GOODS CONFIRMATION / SERVICES data to .ECC
and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 job bring the informations of ECC GR status and update in SRM.
bbp_docuemnt_tab get entries of srm confirmation data and clears clen req up table (po+confirmation number).
clean job must clean this PO+confirmation line in the bbp_docuemnt_tab table.
check your PO number in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB TABLE.
i need to check it up.
br
muthu

0FI_AR_4 not updating item status

Hi !
I am facing a problem with extractor 0FI_AR_4. When loading a delta load with clearing docs the status of the document cleared by this delta is still O.
I can find the clearing doc in the ODS, but the cleared one is still the same, with blank clearing doc and clearing date.
Is this correct ? Shouldn't the cleared doc appear as cleared with its corresponding cleareing doc and clearing date ?
edit: I have just found an OSS Note 1051099 - BUC: Change to clearing information not reported to BW, but I know for certain that the clearing process is made through SAP standard transactions and not the program mentioned in the note. But the problem is the same. The chage of status that should update the record in the ODS is not beign generated, so I have only two records in PSA, one for the original document and another for the clearing doc, but there should be a third one for the update of original doc with status changed to C. Am I right ? Has this happened to anyone else out there ?
Please tell me where to start looking for answers !!
Regards,
Santiago
Edited by: Santiago Reig on Mar 11, 2008 7:32 PM

Hi..
For FI datasources you will not be able to see any data in the delta queue..
Data will get populated in the delta queue during extraction..
After init...it writes the entries into the time stamp table BWOM2_TIMEST in the SAP R/3 System with a new upper limit for the time stamp selection...
Depending on that data will get fetched from the table BKPF based on creation date (CPUDT)...
For 0FI_AR_4 (AR- line items )Selections are made from tables BSID/BSAD (Accounts Receivable)
This is for new entries.......
For changed records data will get fetched from the table BWFI_AEDAT , depending on the time stamp table BWOM2_TIMEST....
Check the following blog :
/people/swapna.gollakota/blog/2008/01/14/one-stage-stop-to-know-all-about-bw-extractors-part1
Regards,
Debjani.........

CUP not updating OCS status when user ends call

Hi All,
I have an issue where, when a user places/receives a call their MOC status shows them as "on a call", 99% of the time when they end the call the MOC status changes back to what ever is was set to, i.e. Available.
The 1% of the time is will stay "in a call".
Now I have managed to trace a call from the CUP server and when the status updated correctly I can see a SIP message "ConnectionClearedEvent", however when the status does NOT change back there is no "ConnectionClearedEvent" in the SIPProxy trace file.
So I am assuimg that some thing between CUCM and CUP is failing everynow and again.
I am having a mental black and need to be pointed to the CUCM process that would pass the information to the CUP server.
CUCM 6.1.5.10000-10
CUP 7.0.3.10000-63
Any other help would be appreciated too..
Cheers
Jason

I would recommend you upgrade to CUPS 7.0.8 before troubleshooting.
In each relase between 7.0.3 and 7.0.8 there are some OCS bugs fixed. Not saying that upgrade would fix your problem. But at least it would rule out the known defects.
If there's no CSTA (INFO) message sent to OCS, the problem would be on CUPS side. It could be the CUPS lost its connection with CTIManager thus not able to get CTI event updates.
Michael
http://htluo.blogspot.com

Auto Approval EBP Purchase Order is not updating the status at the header

Hi There ,
We are facing an issue in EBP auto approval PO ,
The process level schema is set to Auto Approval (Standard 9CBUS2201_EX01_55)
During the PO creation , the standard schema is triggered and it gets approved .
The status of the PO in the Approval Tab is showing as Approved .
But in the docuemnt level the status is still Awaiting Approval .
While checking in SWI1 we came to know that an error has happened in the Task TS40007972
and the Guid ID of SRM Purchase is initial that has made the status(EV_STATUS) as initial .
The ERROR is from the below class & method.
Class: /SAPSRM/CL_WF_PROCESS_MGR_SBWF
Method:GET_PROCESS_DECISION_STATUS
Can anyone suggest to overcome this issue .It will be very usefull if anyone could suggest debugging possibility if any .
Regards,
Arun.

Have you tried notes?
1625513 - Workflow without approval is Awaiting approval status
1724251 - Workflow log error: CREATE_DECISION_SETS cannot be executed

IWeb not updating published status within application

I'm having a strange iWeb problem that just started up within the last day or so. When I publish any of the sites within my domain (I have seven separate "sites" that are all part of the same domain file) the updates get published to my site, but the icons in iWeb do not change color back to blue. This happens whether I choose to publish changes or publish all.
Another symptom of this problem is that my published site (http://www.adamreisinger.com) does not reflect the changes online until about five minutes after iWeb gives me the dialog box that my site has been successfully updated.
The only thing I've changed on my system recently is applying the last round of software updates, including the iLife update. I've tried trashing the application preferences and the iWeb cache and re-publishing, as well as logging out and logging back into MobileMe within System Preferences.
Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried the steps you outlined, and unfortunately the problem persists. Also, because the files were deleted from the Web folder the iDisk, iWeb is now under the impression that EVERY page has been modified, which has actually increased my publishing time.
Some other troubleshooting steps I've taken to try and narrow down this problem:
- I've tried publishing the domain from a newly created user account on the same computer (MBP running 10.6.2 and all latest updates applied)
- I've tried copying the domain file to a different computer (one that has not had the latest iLife support update applied) and publishing from there
- I've tried publishing to a different MobileMe account (a test account set up by Apple)
- I deleted an entire site from the source list in iWeb (one that, fortunately, was not needed)
After all these steps -- tried individually -- the issue persists.

Mailbox Database not update and status is suspended

Dear,
I got below when I wants to update suspended database on DAG mode
MailDB
Failed
Error:
A source-side operation failed. Error An error occurred while performing the seed operation. Error: An error occurred while processing a request on server 'MAIL2'. Error: An I/O error occurred while attempting to access file 'C:\Mail Data\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange
Server\V14\Mailbox\MailDB\MailDB.edb' on source server MAIL2. Error: EseDatabaseBackupReader: PerformDatabaseRead failed with error code 0xFFFFFC18. Expected 65536 bytes read, but actually only 0 were read.. [Database: MailDB, Server: MAIL.teletalk.com.bd]
An error occurred while processing a request on server 'MAIL2'. Error: An I/O error occurred while attempting to access file 'C:\Mail Data\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Mailbox\MailDB\MailDB.edb' on source server MAIL2. Error: EseDatabaseBackupReader:
PerformDatabaseRead failed with error code 0xFFFFFC18. Expected 65536 bytes read, but actually only 0 were read.
An I/O error occurred while attempting to access file 'C:\Mail Data\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Mailbox\MailDB\MailDB.edb' on source server MAIL2. Error: EseDatabaseBackupReader: PerformDatabaseRead failed with error code 0xFFFFFC18. Expected
65536 bytes read, but actually only 0 were read.
EseDatabaseBackupReader: PerformDatabaseRead failed with error code 0xFFFFFC18. Expected 65536 bytes read, but actually only 0 were read.
Click here for help... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.140).aspx?v=14.2.247.1&t=exchgf1&e=ms.exch.err.Ex4543D9
Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
update-MailboxDatabaseCopy -Identity 'MailDB\MAIL' -SourceServer 'MAIL2' -Network 'MailBoxDAG\DAGNetwork02' -DeleteExistingFiles
Elapsed Time: 00:39:28
Thanks, Limon ,Dhaka,Bangladesh

Hi ,
1.Please have a look in to the error message and it clearly says that the database is not active on the source server and also please check the active database on the source server is on healthy state .
Error: An error occurred w
hile processing a request on server 'MAIL2'. Error: Database 'd779408f-7923-4749-963a-05ab9ba77bd6' was
not active on source server 'Mailboxy'.. [Database: MailDB, Server: MAIL.domain.com]
2.test-replicationhealth | fl
3.get-mailboxdatabasecopystatus -server "the server which is holding the active database" |
fl
Please run the above commands to check is there any error messages coming on the output and also if possible
please share me that .
Please reply me if you have any queries.
Regards
S.Nithyanandham
Thanks S.Nithyanandham

Exchange Server 2013 Management Pack in SCOM 2012, can not update healthset status automatically

Hi, all
I have Exchange Server 2013 and SCOM 2012 installed. I have imported Exchange Server 2013 Management Pack to SCOM 2012. Now I have a question that when there is a service not healthy, I can find the red alert in my alert view with the Exchange 2013 server,
but after the service is healthy automatically, the red alert is still there. I can only make it become green healthy status after reseting the healthset status in the healthset explorer.
Does anyone know how to make the server become green healthy status automatically after the monitor is healthy?
Thank you.
Nile

Hi,
How many Exchange Servers do you have? Does this issue only occur on one Exchange Server?
Please check the application log on the problematic Exchange server and see whether there are any related event error.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Issue with CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN - Not updating user status immediately

Hi Everyone,
I need to set a user header status in CRM based on the delivery block selected in ECC sales order. for example, If the delivery block is A2 then user status should be E0008(Image review) etc. For this to happen in the transaction CRMD_ORDER, in save userexit I am reading the shipping data and based on the delivery block, I set the user status using FM "CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN".
When I open the sales order again using CRMD_ORDER, I could see the old status still remaining but when I go to change mode, the user status is reflecting correctly. Can someone pls help me how I can fix this i.e status should change to correct one soon after I open the sales order in CRMD_ORDER.
Thanks,
Dharmendra G

After call of CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN you need to call BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
call function 'CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN'
    exporting
        objnr               = iv_guid
        user_status         = iv_status
    exceptions
        OBJECT_NOT_FOUND    = 1
        STATUS_INCONSISTENT = 2
        STATUS_NOT_ALLOWED = 3
        OTHERS              = 4
if ( sy-subrc = 0 ).
    call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
        exporting
            wait = ABAP_TRUE
else.
    "!+ Handle error
endif.
Best regards,
Tomas.

DLV status not updated in Process order

Hi guys,
I did GR and got goods receipt documents but system is not updating DLV status in process order.
Actually i have by-product and co-products as components in order. I did posting of by-product from Confirmation screen COR6N and for co-products i did MB31 and goods movement doc. get generated. Qty. is also updated in order but NOT the dlv status.
Pl.suggest

Dear,
This is System status and you cannnot maintain it manually once that Business Transaction(FULL Delivery) happens System will automatically sets that status.
DLV status updated once Del completed tick is activated in order header, This tick will get uodated once you do GR for complete qty.
You need to Final confirm (CNF) the Order to get the DLV Status.
Or if the Delivery completed indicator is set in the Process Order, then also th System status will be DLV.
If you want to make it manually then goto co02, enter the order, goto goods receipt tab page and activate delivery completed tick and save...DLV is activated in the head as status.
Please check in BS22-I0012
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Connector Status not updating

As a result of a dramatic failure of communication the SCSM workflow AD account was deleted and recreated, after some muching about everything in SCSM is now working normally again except the config manager and AD connectors are not updating their status.
I initially thought they were not running at all but I have confirmed that they are in fact synchronizing data from their respective sources and its just the display of the status that is not updating. I tried deleting them and recreating them and
now they display no status i.e. the start time, finish time, status, and Percentage columns are all blank.
I have done a bit of research and believe that the problem is that the relationships between the Connectors and their respective SyncStatus objects is missing/broken, and for some reason creating new Connectors either does not establish a corresponding
SyncStatus object or does but does not relate it to the connector.
I have a couple of reasons for this hypothesis first is when I run this powershell*:
$connectorDispName="Your Connector Name Here"
#Following will return in instance of Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.Sdk.Connectors.ADConnector
$myConnector=Get-SCSMConnector -DisplayName $connectorDispName
#Get the EMO object for relationship lookup
$emoConnObj=$myConnector.ConnectorObject
#Relationship id can be retrieved with following:
#Get-SCRelationship -Name 'Microsoft.SystemCenter.LinkingFramework.DataSourceHostSyncStatus'|select id
$relationshipId='1548950d-6cea-d9c1-11ec-53701fbcbbec'
#Find the matching relationship object (with the above relationshipId)
$relationshipObject=Get-SCRelationshipInstance -sourceInstance $emoConnObj|?{$_.RelationshipId -eq $relationshipId}
#$relationshipObject.TargetObject contains an EMO.
#Grab the id and use Get-SCClassInstance to return a type of Microsoft.SystemCenter.LinkingFramework.SyncStatus
$syncStatusObj=Get-SCClassInstance -Id $relationshipObject.TargetObject.Id
The following error is returned:
Get-SCClassInstance : Cannot validate argument on Parameter 'Id'. The argument is null or empty. Provide an argument that is not null or empty, and then try the command again.
At D:\tools\scripts\ConnectorSyncStatus.ps1:14 char:40
+ $syncStatusObj=Get-SCClassInstance -Id $relationshipObject.TargetObject.Id
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [Get-SCClassInstance], ParameterBindingValidationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentValidationError,Microsoft.SystemCenter.Core.Commands.GetSCClassInstanceCommand
Possibly the Powershell is incorrect but this result implies to me that the Get-SCRelationshipInstance call is returning a null value for the syncstatus object which is being fed into the Get-SCClassinstance call.
My second reason for this hypothesis is the following SQL results:
select RelationshipTypeId from dbo.RelationshipType
where dbo.relationshiptype.RelationshipTypeName = 'Microsoft.SystemCenter.LinkingFramework.DataSourceHostSyncStatus';
1548950D-6CEA-D9C1-11EC-53701FBCBBEC
select * from dbo.relationship
where RelationshipTypeId = '1548950D-6CEA-D9C1-11EC-53701FBCBBEC';
Returns no results.
This implies to me that there are no instances of the relationship linking a Connector to its corresponding SyncStatus object.
I am not an SQL or Powershell expert but I know enough to be dangerous, so does my reasoning seem correct? And if so how could I fix this?
Thanks In advance
* this Powershell is not of my own devising, I cribbed it from
Steve IAnson in this question:
Query Connector Status

Yes there is every 1 minute there is a squence of entires as follows:
Source: Lfx Service
Event: ID 3334
Data:
Error setting status for property &. Error:The relationship source specified in the discovery data item is not valid.
Relationship source ID: ae5465d3-2565-c7d3-0de2-acc994c1e928
Rule ID: eb496966-4fb7-45bd-bdda-b689af383733
Instance:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<RelationshipInstance TypeId="{1548950d-6cea-d9c1-11ec-53701fbcbbec}" SourceTypeId="{71f6cfcd-99b3-3a07-471d-bb9c4bf5ba76}" TargetTypeId="{2d4afd51-d2ff-92c6-266f-2b6060000dae}">
<Settings />
<SourceRole>
<Settings>
<Setting>
<Name>29906075-e9fc-7bc4-487b-f964f91d6532</Name>
<Value>1e6592a2-96c3-4b99-a50a-c04ee2a793e6</Value>
</Setting>
</Settings>
</SourceRole>
<TargetRole>
<Settings>
<Setting>
<Name>29906075-e9fc-7bc4-487b-f964f91d6532</Name>
<Value>1e6592a2-96c3-4b99-a50a-c04ee2a793e6</Value>
</Setting>
</Settings>
</TargetRole>
</RelationshipInstance>
Status data:ConnectorId:ec4a037e-e0f0-47a2-b7e7-7932eba2a0ac;
BaseManagementEntityId:e22fffb2-9b85-de47-fe3d-875914b21797;
LastRunStartTime:25/11/2014 2:00:44 AM;
LastRunFinishTime:25/11/2014 2:02:57 AM;
NextSyncTime:27/11/2014 2:00:00 AM;
Status:FinishedSuccess;
SyncPercent:100;
MaxValue:100;
MinValue:0;.
Source:OpsMgr SDK Service
Event ID: 26319
Data:
An exception was thrown while processing ProcessDiscoveryData for session ID uuid:e47c3453-2524-44af-a9d9-2475e3a204a6;id=3.
Exception message: The relationship source specified in the discovery data item is not valid.
Relationship source ID: ae5465d3-2565-c7d3-0de2-acc994c1e928
Rule ID: eb496966-4fb7-45bd-bdda-b689af383733
Instance:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<RelationshipInstance TypeId="{1548950d-6cea-d9c1-11ec-53701fbcbbec}" SourceTypeId="{71f6cfcd-99b3-3a07-471d-bb9c4bf5ba76}" TargetTypeId="{2d4afd51-d2ff-92c6-266f-2b6060000dae}">
<Settings />
<SourceRole>
<Settings>
<Setting>
<Name>29906075-e9fc-7bc4-487b-f964f91d6532</Name>
<Value>1e6592a2-96c3-4b99-a50a-c04ee2a793e6</Value>
</Setting>
</Settings>
</SourceRole>
<TargetRole>
<Settings>
<Setting>
<Name>29906075-e9fc-7bc4-487b-f964f91d6532</Name>
<Value>1e6592a2-96c3-4b99-a50a-c04ee2a793e6</Value>
</Setting>
</Settings>
</TargetRole>
</RelationshipInstance>
Full Exception: Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Common.DiscoveryDataInvalidRelationshipSourceException: The relationship source specified in the discovery data item is not valid.
Relationship source ID: ae5465d3-2565-c7d3-0de2-acc994c1e928
Rule ID: eb496966-4fb7-45bd-bdda-b689af383733
Instance:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><RelationshipInstance TypeId="{1548950d-6cea-d9c1-11ec-53701fbcbbec}" SourceTypeId="{71f6cfcd-99b3-3a07-471d-bb9c4bf5ba76}" TargetTypeId="{2d4afd51-d2ff-92c6-266f-2b6060000dae}">
<Settings />
<SourceRole>
<Settings>
<Setting>
<Name>29906075-e9fc-7bc4-487b-f964f91d6532</Name>
<Value>1e6592a2-96c3-4b99-a50a-c04ee2a793e6</Value>
</Setting>
</Settings>
</SourceRole>
<TargetRole>
<Settings>
<Setting>
<Name>29906075-e9fc-7bc4-487b-f964f91d6532</Name>
<Value>1e6592a2-96c3-4b99-a50a-c04ee2a793e6</Value>
</Setting>
</Settings>
</TargetRole>
</RelationshipInstance>
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DiscoveryDatabaseAccess.ManagementStoreWriter.BulkUpsertRelationshipInstances(DiscoveryDatabaseApi dbApi, DiscoveryDataInstance discoveryDataInstance, Boolean isCalledByWorkflow, TypeSpaceData typeSpaceData)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DiscoveryDatabaseAccess.ManagementStoreWriter.BulkAddUpdate(DiscoveryDataInstance discoveryDataInstance, Boolean isCalledByWorkflow, TypeSpaceData typeSpaceData, DiscoveryDatabaseApi dbApi)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DiscoveryDatabaseAccess.ManagementStoreWriter.Write(DiscoveryDataInstance discoveryDataInstance, Boolean isCalledByWorkflow, TypeSpaceData typeSpaceData, DiscoveryDatabaseApi dbApi)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DiscoveryDatabaseAccess.DiscoveryPackageProcessor.ProcessWithNoRetryUnauthorized(DiscoveryDatabaseApi dbApi, Boolean useProcessContext)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceDataLayer.DiscoveryDataManager.DiscoveryPackageIncrementalProcessingHandler.ProcessIncrementalDiscoveryData(DatabaseConnection databaseConnection)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceDataLayer.DiscoveryDataManager.DiscoveryPackageIncrementalProcessingHandler.Process()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DiscoveryDatabaseAccess.DiscoveryPackageProcessor.ProcessWithRetry(HandleProcessing handleProcessing, RetryPolicy retryPolicy)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceDataLayer.DiscoveryDataManager.ProcessDiscoveryDataWithRetry(DatabaseConnection dbconnection, Guid discoverySourceId, IList`1 sdkEntityInstances, IDictionary`2 streams, IContext context)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceDataLayer.ConnectorFrameworkConfigurationService.ProcessDiscoveryData(Guid discoverySourceId, IList`1 entityInstances, IDictionary`2 streams, ObjectChangelist`1 extensions)
Source:DataAccessLayer
Event ID: 33333
Data:
Data Access Layer rejected retry on SqlError:
Request: ProcessRelationshipStagingForUpsert -- (TransactionId=732419), (DiscoverySourceId=eb496966-4fb7-45bd-bdda-b689af383733), (TimeGenerated=26/11/2014 9:31:53 PM), (PerformHealthServiceCheck=False), (HealthServiceId=), (RETURN_VALUE=1)
Class: 16
Number: 777980002
Message: The specified relationship doesn't have a valid source.

Status of UWL will not update

Hi
I configured the UWL iView. Everything but for the <b>Status</b> of the work item seem to work correctly.
Once any work item is approved or rejected, the UWL will NOT update the status.
I checked the UWL properties to fix this, but I'm having no luck.
Can anyone help me with this issue
Thanks in advance
regards
Priya

Hi Priya,
First thing is u can make such changes or set thr status of UWL using API too
But in such case u need the par ..
The property of UWL ststus can me changed using
Class StatusEnum
static StatusEnum COMPLETED
          This indicates whether or not the task is completed.
static StatusEnum EXECUTED
          This indicates whether or not the task is executed.
static StatusEnum INPROGRESS
          This indicates whether item is in progress.
static StatusEnum NEW
          This indicates whether the task is new.
static StatusEnum READ
          This indicates whether or not the item is read.
U can find the detailed API --<a href="https://help.sap.com/javadocs/NW04S/current/uw/index.html">UWL API</a>
Thanks,
Swathi
<i>Pls offer points if helped in any way</i>

Error while updating the status record of IDOC in SAP

Hi All,
I am facing this problem. I have done outbound processing and IDOC was sent successfully from SAP to EDI system and it was processed in EDI and now EDI system wants to send the status back to SAP with a status message and the status number that we are using is '24' and we have mapped all the fields in the status table EDIDS and made sure that EDI system sends all those and I think Counter field can not be determined by EDI system so EDI system used the counter '1' since it can not determine how many counters are already there in SAP and unless we pass the value to this counter field we were getting the error. After passing all the values the status of the IDOC is updated with the status '00' instead of '24' and we do not know why it is happened and I would like to know how SAP converts the status record that is received from the EDI system.
Please let me know how the status record will be translated into SAP from EDI system and I ahve followed basically EDIDS structure and the IDOC status is updating in SAP but with wrong status number and the alignemnt also missing in SAP fields like if I give some text in the EDI it is splitting and storing in 2 fields.
Please help me in this and I think I have explained the problem in a detail manner.
Thanks,
Ramesh.

Hi Naresh,
Thanks for the reply and my question is since EDI system is able to send the status back to SAP from EDI system and only problem is it is updatinf the status wrong and I have checked the EDIDS table also and the entry is creating with another counter and please confirm me that it is because of EDI does not support the status record update so that I can confirm to the client that there is nothing wrong in the way SAP functions and EDI system can not update the status code in the SAP.
Thanks,
Ramesh.

IDOC_INPUT_STPPOD not updating POD status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for