IDOC mapping 1 to 0..unbounded problem in PI 7.1
All,
We've recently implemented SAP PI 7.1 but we face an issue at the moment. Let me describe the case
We have a Source message which is the DEBMAS IDOC.
Within the IDOC we use mappings for Header data and for Detail Data.
Mapping the header data is no issue that is a 1 to 1 message mapping to our canonical data.
BUT
When we want to use the message split mapping in order to extract the detail data PER line we have discovered a problem.
When within a message mapping or within the operation mapping we use as Source the IDOC ( occurancy 1 ) and the target we take our detail canonical message (occurancy 0..unbounded) we are getting the message in our mapping that the IDOC cannot be resolved.
When we change the target occurancy to 1 then the mapping works well.
Is there any one facing the same issues as we do.
thanks in advance
This is an issue with queues with different length. You should always avoid this, as you cannot be sure, what happens.
Instead of assigning a single entry queue to a target that expects a multiple entry queue, you should go for a generating function. A generating function delivers as many queue entries as requested.
In your scenario, just use an empty constant. Of you have a value to be repeated, use CopyValue.
Regards
Stefan
Similar Messages
-
Hello,
We'd like to store the idoc data extracted from EDI 852 inbound transaction in an infocube for DP. SAP Note 154604 suggests that trx <b>/sapapo/map_tser</b> can be used for specifying the infocube.
However, in SCM 4.1, this trx has a field for PA only, not infocube. I was wondering how to pull the data into infocube.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you,
MalliHello,
I'm afraid that i can not help you.
I am witting you because i am trying to get information about VMI/ SMI implementation, for ex. IDOC mapping, best practices, etc.
I will be appreciate if you can provide me this information.
Thanks&Rgds
Angélica -
Need to generate 2 idoc"mapping issue"
Hi Experts,
When the Purchase_order_type is coming like HIGH,REGULAR,NEW,BOUNCED. In this case i need to generate 2 idoc, based on HIGH is one and Other than HIGH is one, even though if it's REGULAR,NEW,BOUNCED.
I can't generate. pl suggest
rgds
selvamHi,
Please make sure you will sort the data in your select query.
Now, you need to have two idocs in mapping. Click on Duplicate Subtree to have second IDOC. Now lets assume, your first IDOC represents mapping when ORDER TYPE is HIGH and your second IDOC represents mapping when your ORDER TYPE is not equal to HIGH that is NEW, BOUNCED, REGULAR etc.
I have defined Source and Target data type as follows.
Source Data Type:
SDN
<Row>
<CQ_NO/>
<ORDER_TYPE/>
<LINE_NO/>
</Row>
Target Data Type:
SDNTarget
<IDOC>
<Node>
<CQ_NO/>
<ORDER_TYPE/>
<ItemNode>
<LINENO/>
</ItemNode>
</Node>
</IDOC>
Mapping for IDOC 1:
IDOC:
Order Type -->Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed) -->collapse context
Output of point 4 will be first input to u201CStart withu201D function and second input will be constant u201Ctrueu201D
Output of Point 5 --> create if --> IDOC
Node:
Map with constant
CQ_NO:
Order Type --> Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed)
User Format By example. Pass CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at Row) as first input and second input should be output of point 4.
Pass Output of format by example that is point no 5, to collapse context --> Split by value (Each Value) --> CQ_NO
ORDER_TYPE
Order Type --> Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed)
User Format By example. Pass ORDER_TYPE (Context of CQ_NO should be at Row) as first input and second input should be output of point 4.
Item Node:
Order Type --> Fix Values --> remove context
Fix Values (This should have default u201Cfalseu201D and HIGH = true)
Concatenate Output of point 1 with CQ_NO (Context of CQ_NO should be at SDN)
Output of point 3 --> Split by value (value changed)
Output of point 4 will be first input to u201CStart withu201D function and second input will be constant u201Ctrueu201D
Output of Point 5 --> create if --> IDOC -
Hi all,
i'm getting an error from SXMB_MONI in a scenario File to Idoc.
I have done the mapping from source file and Idoc CREMAS03, when i try to test from Integration Repository it's all ok, but when the scenario is executed i find this error in Idoc Adapter :
<SAP:P1>MSGGUID EF7E2140A08811DDBE1202004C4F4F50: Tag #TEXT found instead of tag IDOC BEGIN=</SAP:P1>
The field BEGIN in idoc structure is filled with constant value 1, than i dont understand the error.
This is the xml source file :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:Vendor xmlns:ns0="urn:tbit40:workshop:group01:legacy">
- <Address>
<Country>IT</Country>
<Zip>001</Zip>
<City>ROMA</City>
<Street>SATTA</Street>
</Address>
<Currency>USD</Currency>
<SearchTerm>TEST</SearchTerm>
<LastName>GUIDA</LastName>
<VendorNumber>44332</VendorNumber>
</ns0:Vendor>
Any help is really appreciated.
Thanks.Hi all and thanks for your answer.
My problem is that for what i can see all Idoc attribute (like the attribute BEGIN) are mapped with constant value.
In taget source i can see : BEGIN = Constant([value=1])
What i dont understand is why when i execute the scenario it ends with this message :
<SAP:P1>MSGGUID EF7E2140A08811DDBE1202004C4F4F50: Tag #TEXT found instead of tag IDOC BEGIN=</SAP:P1>
It seem to me that the tag BEGIN is not filled with value, i also tried to copy the source xml file directly from SXMB_MONI (from payload) and test it in Integration Repository mapping section, but here is all ok and the test end succesfully. -
hi,
I have a file to idoc scenario. Have a header and 5 line items segment on the source. After doing mapping when i test, the message mapping does not ouput all the corresponding nodes in the Idoc structure for each item segment on the source side. The output is only displaying the first two segment from the source. Could someone help with this?
thx,
PradipHi Pradip,
just check the cardinality of target node - which is mapped to your line item.....it should be 0..unbounded
moreover, the target node if it under some other node then check the cardinality of the above node, it should also be 0..unbounded
if you are using any condition for target node generation, then check the condition again.....
Thanks,
Rajeev Gupta -
Hello,
I'm stuck with a complex mapping issue that I can't figure out. I'm trying to pull 0..N Variant Configuration segments from the ORDERS IDOC and map it into a 0..N XML segment.
The inbound ORDERS IDOC is structured like this:
IDOC
...E1EDP01 (Item segment 0..N)
......E1EDP19 (Product data 0..5)
...........Z1EDPIT (Configuration Data 0..N)
.................ATUE1 (Description)
.................ZCODE (Category)
.................RTWTB (Value)
Target XML:
Order
....Item (Item segment 0..N)
.......Product (Product data 0..1)
............VariantConfig (configuration data 0..N)
....................Description
....................Category
.....................Value
I need to create a new VariantConfig segment in my XML for every Z1EDPIT segment for that PO Item. But I need to skip any Z1EDPIT segments when ATUE1 = 'OPTIONS' or when ATUE1 does not exist.
The problem I'm running into is that my mapping is capable of creating the VariantConfig segment under those conditions but the following mappings used to create the Description/Category/Value are unable to skip the Z1EDPIT segments.
For example:
IDOC
...E1EDP01
......E1EDP19
...........Z1EDPIT
.................ZCODE = REQT
.................RTWTB = 5644
...........Z1EDPIT
.................ATUE1 = Finish
.................ZCODE = REQT
.................RTWTB = 7712
The output XML should read:
Order
....Item
.......Product
............VariantConfig
....................Description = Finish
....................Category = REQT
.....................Value = 7712
So I determine to create the VariantConfig segment if ATUE1 exists and does not equal 'OPTIONS'. So my mapping creates one VariantConfig segment because the second Z1EDPIT qualifies. But each element within that node is reverting back to the first Z1EDPIT segment.
I thought the top of the Node (VariantConfig) would determine the context for the following fields. Therefore, when the 2nd Z1EDPIT segment generates the VariantConfig node then the elements should refer to the current context of the root node (VariantConfig).
What tools does PI's mapping provide to resolve a situation like this?
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
MattJob,
Thanks, for the responses!
What do you mean by "add a context change for the fields".
Is there some mapping function to add a context change or is this a UDF I need to write to handle the context changes when ATUE1 is missing or equal to "OPTIONS".
In my example:
VariantConfig:
ATUE1 (E1EDP01) >mapWithDefault [OPTIONS] equatsS [OPTIONS] -> Not ->createIf->VariantConfig
Sub Element
Category
ATUE1 (E1EDP01) >mapWithDefault [OPTIONS] equatsS [OPTIONS] -> Not ->ifWithoutElse>ZCODE->Category
The problem is that this does not keep the ATUE1 and the ZCODE in the same Z1EDPIT segment. So I get the first ZCODE value when I only want the 2nd. Even if I insert a context change I can't say for sure that next time I won't have 5 Z1EDPIT segments missing the ATUE1 segment before I find my first good segment that I need to map.
...confused...
Thanks,
Matt -
Hi,
Target field is : Bank Address 1:
Source mapping: it is a Idoc with the following requirements
IF E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER = CNY and LEN(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM)<=11
then MID(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM,2,10)
IF E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER = CNY and LEN(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM)>11
then MID(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM,12,11)
IF E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER <> CNY and LEN(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM)<=35
then MID(E1IDB02 BB-STRAS,1,35)
IF E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER <> CNY and LEN(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM)>35
then MID(E1IDB02 BB-FIIBKNAM,36,35)
E1IDB02 -- is a segment name with occurence 1..1
BA and BB are the qualifiers
FIIBKNAM is the field name.
I am unable to map this as the condition has to be given with two qualifiers at a time.
Can some one help me out on this. Can we define the UDF where we can store this information as temporary variable. If UDF can be defined, please let me know with the details.
Regards,
ManojHI,
Yes, but you have to write your own UDF ,
but i can give example use this to solve your problem.
IF E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER = CNY
then MID(E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1,12,11)
1)
input E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1,E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER
if (E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER = CNY) {
return substring(E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1,12,11);
2)
input E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1,E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER
IF (E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER <> CNY ) && ( (E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1).length<=35)
return substring(E1EDKA1 BE-STRAS,1,35);
3)
IF (E1IDB02 BA-FIIKWAER <> CNY) && ((E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1).length>35)
return substring(E1EDKA1 BE-NAME1,36,35);
Before map this first map with same level of empty constant and concat it, if it is empty,later map with substring.
Regards
Chilla -
Hello,
I have a connection going from a SQL (via a JDBC connection), mapping into an IDOC. Connections all work, but for some reason when I turn on the communication channel to pull from the database through a SELECT statement, I only get the header of the Idoc (below). I have tried many different things and cannot see why the mapping does not seem to be working. When I load the test data as a test instance in the mapping, it works. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<CRMXIF_PRODUCT_MATERIAL_SAVE01 />Hi,
Document Name
The document name is inserted in the message as the main XML tag. The default value is resultset.
Document Namespace
The namespace is added to the document name.
See the example below
The system converts the table resulting from the query SQL statement into a valid XML document and sends it to the Integration Engine. The document looks like this:
<resultset>
<row>
<column-name1>column-value</ column-name1>
<column-name2>column-value</ column-name2>
<column-name3>column-value</ column-name3>
</row>
<row>
<column-name1>column-value</ column-name1>
<column-name2>column-value</ column-name2>
<column-name3>column-value</ column-name3>
</row>
</resultset>
Regards
Chilla.. -
Query on Context Handling ( File to IDOC mapping )
Hi All,
I've a scenario from file to IDOC. The structure of file is as follows.
Struct ( occurs unbounded times )
|
- Name
Str. of IDOC
Node
|
- name1
- name2
- name3
- name4
The problem is that the name in file can occur many times.
So if say name occurs 2 times in the file then it has to be mapped to name1 and name2 in IDOC.
If Name in file occurs 3 times it'll be mapped to name1, name2 and name3 in IDOC.
Am looking for some help.
Thanks,
Joe.Hi Joe,
For every name in the file, you will have to map the value to the name field in the IDoc. Use SplitByValue node function available in the graphical editor. You will be able to achieve this mapping. For more about the usage, here's the documenation and a blog(where an example has been given):-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/3bb8c495125e4eb5969f0377885fe0/frameset.htm
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Regards,
Sushumna -
Flat file to idoc mapping issue
Hi Gurus,
i had a flat file format in sender side as below:
H_ID TYP_CODE line_elemet Quantity
5896 STANDARD 1.transmitter 1
5896 STANDARD 2.xxxxxxxxx 1
5896 STANDARD 3.yyyyyyyyy 2
6895 STANDARD 1.aaaaaaaaa 1
9436 STANDARD 1.bbbbbbbbb 4
9436 STANDARD 2.ggggggggg 3
The above file need to be send to an Idoc.
for which same header_ID values should create only one header segment, under that many a line segments should create as many line items appear on that header_id value.
Here my query is how to suppress the repetetive header values to create onlyone header segment. And how to create as many line_item segments as the number of line items appear.
points obvoius for the response
Thanks in advance,
Sekhar.About map problem I suggest youn to see the following link that are really helpful to improve knowledge about mapping:
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/08/16/message-mapping-simplified--part-i
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
I suggest you to see the following link to learn more about mapping:
Mapping functionality in XI
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9202d890-0201-0010-1588-adb5e89a6638
SAP Exchange Infrastructure - Graphical_Mapping
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6658bd90-0201-0010-fbb6-afe25fb398d3
SAP Exchange Infrastructure - Graphical Mapping Exercise
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fd5ebd90-0201-0010-d697-91374d5b5190
SAP Exchange Infrastructure - Graphical Mapping - Advanced
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/be05e290-0201-0010-e997-b6e55f9548dd
SAP Exchange Infrastructure: Mapping Patterns - Understand Context Handling in Message Mapping - Webinar Powerpoint
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f59730fa-0901-0010-df97-c12f071f7d3b
SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure Mapping Troubleshooting - Webinar Powerpoint
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e01e9400-9e81-2910-20a5-a862945a5e98
Mapping Lookups a RFC API
Mapping lookups - RFC API
XI 3.0 New Mapping Features
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8a57d190-0201-0010-9e87-d8f327e1dba7
I hope these links will be usefull.
Regards,
Salvatore -
Hello everybody,
I have the next scenario Oracle DB-> XI-> Idoc PAYEXT, now the problem is that I get the error in the message mapping that Mapping not sufficiently defined, my strcutures look fine, so is there a way to know all the required fields for an Idoc, there is no fields in red as in other ocassions indicates mapping required, any suggestions????, thanks in advance.
Regards,
Julio CesarHi Julio,
As Aamir suggested, you can used TC :WE60 to check the idoc structure and mandatory fields.
Just in addition to Aamir, In most of the idocs when you assign constant to a idoc segment in order to generate segment you need to populate the mandatory fields of that segment as well. So you need to assign values to mandatory fields of segment only if you want to generate that particular segment ( By assigning constant / mapping input element value for repeatation.)
In you case can you please check if you are trying to generate some segment, but you havent mapped mandatory fields of that segment.
Hope this will help.
Let us know if you need more detals.
Nilesh -
Automatic (EDI) vendor posting fails - can I update the IDOC mapping?
Hi -- I am testing a new intercompany sales process and having trouble with returns. The INVOIC01 IDOC for the vendor posting (document type VC - Vendor Credit FI) is failing because text is required on the line item (field SGTXT on BSEG). So it appears that the IDOC doesn't have this text field mapped.
If I can identify a field in the existing IDOC to use for the text, is there a way that I can add that mapping? For example, let's say I want to populate the BSEG text with field BELNR on segment E1EDP01, is there a way to specify in the INVOIC01 idoc that this field should be plugged into BSEG-SGTXT? I don't have EDI experience, so this is all new to me!
Thanks
AllisonHi Allison,
Since it's just for testing, just change the Text field on FI field status group become optional entry. It will solve your problem rather than modifying the standard IDOC
Regards,
Gumanti -
Help!! - File to Idoc Mapping with Nested structure
Scenario:
I have an inbound file that has three nested records.
eg. A00, B00 and C00. C00 is nested structure of B00 and B00 nested structure of A00. All these structure can repeat N number of times in a file.
How do I map this to IDoc structure that have one segment each for the three structures in the file and nested in the same way.
Question: How is the parent child relationship established?
Suppose I have a file
A00 1234 Sam 29
B00 london LE3 XYZ
B00 US 123456
C00 2 XYZ
A00 5678 Joe 22
B00 US 23456
If I make a nested structure and then say in the file conversion properties that A00 go to segA and then B00 go to segB, but then when I come back to A00, how do I move the data to the A00?
Thanks in Advance
RgdsFrom what you have layed out, you can create a data type with 3 children, all 1..unbounded cardinality, each containing their own elements. You say they are nested, but the example you gave isn't nested... it's just A's followed by B's followed by C's. If that is the case, you can then use a data type w/ 3 subelements (A, B & C) and each of those is actually a container with the real attributes of that line in your file. (I can email you a schema quickly if you need it)
If you are saying they can occur like this:
A00 1234 Sam 29
B00 london LE3 XYZ
B00 US 123456
C00 2 XYZ
B00 US 23456
C00 2 XYZ
THEN they are nested - ie B's & C's repeat under any A. Then you must create segment B as a subelement of segment A instead of on the same level, then bury C under B. (I find this easiest w/ a text tool rather than inside XI, as I can cut/paste segments where I want them to belong...)
Good luck with setting up content conversion on that file adapter... We have done this a few times, and it can be quite interesting.
If you have trouble with the schema, you can post your email & I can give you a quick example.
Message was edited by: Amanda Derringer -
File - XI - Idoc : mapping issue
Hello gurus,
I have a mapping issue:
I have a mapping between FICABillingNotification to FKK_EBS_DOC_TREE
Some fields are mapped one to one, others a mapped to constants.
But for some reason i don't know, not all fields get the right value.
For example:
Working:
Constant 1 --> BEGIN
Constant LS --> RCVPRT (Receiver Partner Type)
Not working:
Constant FILE-->RCVPOR (Receiver Port)
I had an other value the first time i tried it, but now i changed it to FILE but this value is not used by the mapping.
Any help would be welcome
Thanks
Thomas
Edited by: Thomas Pary on May 28, 2008 3:36 PMThis was allready done (sorry i didn't answered that question).
But Ok now i see, that for this RCVPOR the value of the constant "FILE" is mapped, and i can see it in the payload in SXMB_MONI after the mapping. But it isn't populated to the IDoc field :-s
Another problem is, that like the one said above, some of my values are not mapped :
<FICAExternalBilling>
--<DocumentHeader> mapped to EF1KK_EBS_DOC_HEADER
<BillFromId>25001254</BillFromId> mapped to REF_DOC_NUMBER
<PostingDate>20080520</PostingDate> mapped to POST_DATE
<DocumentDate>20080520</DocumentDate> mapped to DOC_DATE
<OriginTypeId>IV</OriginTypeId> mapped to EXT_DOC_TYPE
<ObjectType/>
<ObjectKey/>
<PendingCommitmentGroupID/>
<InvoiceReferenceID/>
<DisputeDocumentReferenceID/>
--</DocumentHeader>
The value of OriginTypeId is not mapped, but the value of DocumentDate and PostingDate are mapped. -
Hi Experts
I have facing some confusion when i am doing mapping for my scenario FILE to IDOC.
The IDOC Structure is as follows
HeaderRecord 0-1
DataRecord1 0-unbounded
(Subnode)DataRecord2 0-unbounded
(Subnode)DataRecord4 0-unbounded
DataRecord5 0-unbounded
(subnode) DataRecord6 0-unbounded
TrailerRecord 0-1
when the DataRecord1 is executed, an idoc is generated and all the DataRecord2,DataRecord4,DataRecord6 shld come under that particular Idoc. And when another Idoc is generated,all the DataRecord2,DataRecord5,DataRecord6 shld come under that particular Idoc.
How to achieve mapping for this??
please help me out.
Edited by: vemuganti naga phalguna on Oct 27, 2010 7:56 AM
Edited by: vemuganti naga phalguna on Oct 27, 2010 7:59 AMHi
1) Source file is Text File.
sample source data.
A|20101006142345|SAPQMP|40|
B|5999|R00003D||N|20072008|Unknown|
C|T0014|M1556||colourless Pale yellow||Receipt-Bulk|1|Yes|Y|Text||
C|T0001|M1556||Limpid liquid ||Receipt-Bulk|1|Yes|Y|Text||
C|T1379|M1398|18||23|Receipt-Bulk|1|Yes|Y|Number|mm²/s|
B|5998|R00014A||N|20072008|Unknown|
C|T0014|M0211||2.0||CoA|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0014|M0211||2.0||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0014|M0211||2.0||Transfer|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0051|M0271|97|||CoA|1|No|Y|Number|None|
C|T0073|M1356|Pass|||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|||
C|T0073|M1356|Pass|||Transfer|1|No|Y|||
C|T0025|M0331||0.880||CoA|1|No|Y||g/ml|
C|T0025|M0331||0.880||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y||g/ml|
C|T0025|M0331||0.880||Transfer|1|No|Y||g/ml|
C|T0001|M1556||Clear & Bright ||CoA|1|No|Y|Text||
C|T0049|M0341|28.0||32.0|CoA|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0049|M0341|28.0||32.0|Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0049|M0341|28.0||32.0|Transfer|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0042|M0422|||-15|CoA|1|No|Y||°C|
C|T0092|M0578|||16|CoA|1|No|Y|Number|% Loss|
C|T0021|M0199||||CoA|1|No|Y||minutes|
C|T0039|M1453|Mktble|||CoA|1|No|Y|||
C|T0050|M0341||5.1||CoA|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0050|M0341||5.1||Receipt-Bulk|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0050|M0341||5.1||Transfer|1|No|Y|Number|mm²/s|
C|T0026|M0412|210|||CoA|1|No|Y|Number|°C|
Z|20101006142355|SAPQMP|40|
where Records A indicate File Header, Z indicates File Trailer
Recodrs B indicateds Material header and Would be repeating multiple times
No. of B Records = No. of Idocs generated with corresponding C records data which indicates Component Rows (multiple)
i.e as many B records file contains, that many Idoc will be created
For Mapping I require B and C Records. Field Separator is Pipe | symbol
I need to Ignore A B C Z
How to define the source structure and the respective FCC Parameters
please help me out
Maybe you are looking for
-
[Feature Request] Better support for new buttons in JUNavigationBar
In my project I use a home made sub-class of JUNavigationBar, which contains some new functionality apart from a new button as well. This button allows me to refresh the currently selected row. However, since I added this button though a simple this.
-
this iphone cannot be used because the apple device serice is not started? what do i do
-
How to uninstall the patch?
i'm upgrading from portal v3.0.9.8.0 to v3.0.9.8.3 but there's some major error, portal is not showing! anyway to uninstall the patches? thx
-
Changing Architecture Design - SSRS Sharepoint Integrated Mode
Hi. I have a multi-server SharePoint configuration I am trying to simplify and was wondering if I could get some advice here. I am not very knowledgable of SharePoint but have a good understanding of how distributed server architectures basically fun
-
FOR ALL ENTRIES in Object Oriented Context
Dear all, is it possible to use FOR ALL ENTRIES for an internal table with out header line ? I Am using Objected Oriented Programming and I Am not able to create internal table with header line . Please provide your valuable inputs on thi