IDOC messages REMADV Version

Hi all,
I have to create idocs with REMADV message type. I would like to know how to find REMADV version. because i heared that there is different versions.
Regards
Mercuryx

Hello,
Please use transaction WE82 to find different versions of IDOC types linked to message type REMADV.  Message type REMADV has only one version.
Thanks,
Venu

Similar Messages

  • Invoice posting  is not triggering idoc message in EBP to FI backned ECC6

    Hi ,
    We are working on classic scenario with SRM 5 having EBP and SUS on separate clients on same srm system.
    Now we are extending standlone scenario for selected product categories .
    We have created product master ,product category & vendor master in SRM EBP client. Defined below settings
    1.Define Sourcing for Product Categories -local
    2.Define Objects in Backend System  -EBP of type Local
    3.Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignmet
    We are able to create Shpping cart ->purchase order( local)->confirm goods & invoice for local product
    With  central ccountant authorization employee user has created the invoice  and resulted status of invoice as
    "Currently Being Transferred" , expected   to post the invoice in ECC system but after invoice idoc is not getting generated in SRM in order to  transferred to backend  ?
    I have tried and in debug mode found that ,Logical System of Logistics Backend is wrongly
    attached to invoice ie instead of ECC logical system it is appearing SRM Local logical system . After changing the
    backend value  for invoice header -BE_LOG_SYSTEM from srm to ecc backend & executed
    FM-BBP_PROCDOC_TRANSFER  for particular invoice ,Idoc Basic type        BBPIV01 is generated and passed to ecc.
    But not able to identify why wrong "Logistic backend " is appeared in invoice. we have below attributes maintained in
    Employee
    Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     DSRCLNT254(SRM local)
    Company Code                                         BUK     100
    Cost Center                                                               CNT     430900
    System Alias                                                         SYS     LOGSYS250
    System Alias for Accounting Systems                   ACS     DSRCLNT254
    System Alias for Vendor                                      VENDOR_SYS     LOGSYS250
    Vendor
    Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     LOGSYS250(ECC)
    Company Code                           BUK                            100
    System Alias for Vendor                      VENDOR_SYS                            LOGSYS250(ECC)
    Kindly help me to post the invoice to ECC backend ,

    Thanks Sheetal,
    We have classic scenario in place so ECC system (LOGSYS250 ) is defined as backend system  of type- ERP_2.0   &
    FIvalid- realtime backend validation .
    We are using  ECC is the accounting system defined  in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
    Note: More to add that Invocie idoc generated after  backend logical system correction in invoice header data  of SRM ,
    it is posting invoice successfully in eCC backend .  So  data correction for logical system value is seems  some problem with standlone scenario configuration . 
    We have validating this scenario for selectd product categories as  with SRM 5 version in place,  customer is intrested to use Invoice management system ie.   invoice should be validated with exceptions  in SRM before posting to ECC.
    We have EBP & SUS in different client on SRM system ,so  in existing  classical scenario   invoices created in SUS  against ECC backned purchase orders is  not flowing to IMS in EBP . Can you help me to validate the scenario ?
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 2, 2009 1:51 PM
    Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 5, 2009 11:37 AM
    Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 9, 2009 7:38 AM.
    Issue is resolved  . It is the System Alias for Accounting Systems setting in organization  module .
    Now with completion of workflow  idoc message-BBPIV is generated in SRM and successfully posting in ECC.
    Thanks a lot for your inputs .

  • Message monitor - IDOCs messages

    Hi
    I've created and sent IDOC messages from ERP to MII. However there is no single message found in MII. Any idea? The error message in MII is "Unknown error no messages" (something like that as I translated from German to English)
    What I did checked
    1. MII IDOC listener status - ok
    2. ERP RFC connection -ok
    But I saw error message under transaction SM58  "Error when opening an RFC connection"
    Thanks for posting

    Dear Seng,
    I am working on MII12.1.5 build 91
    I was also getting error in idoc receiving see below thread but now issue got resolved.
    iDoc not received in MII
    In my case iDoc sent successfully from SAP but not received in MII.
    So i have created one more wrong RFC destination along with actual correct one.
    then configured it in SAP NW as well as in SAP MII with same setting as i done for correct one it worked.
    then i deleted the wrong RFC Destination and also deleted settings of wrong one in SAP NW and MII.
    then my actual correct one is worked.
    its strange but workes for me .
    may i know on which MII version you are working.
    Regards,
    Manoj Bilthare

  • File to Idoc (message split)

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a incoming xml file which is split into multiple debmas idoc for ecc.
    In message-mapping, message-tab
    source message occurance is set as '1' and target is set with "0...unbound"
    On target:idoc
    There is NO mapping for Messages and Message1 nodes. DEBMAS06 is mapped to source-field to create as many idocs. IDOC has NO map and BEGIN is set as constant(1).
    When i run the test, my result is as below: (NO Idoc)
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
    <ns0:Message1></ns0:Message1>
    </ns0:Messages>
    When i ran the scenario with a test-file, got following error message:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_IDOC_RUNTIME</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>MSGGUID C834F5D4235B44BD373F9F12AA5B0674: Tag found instead of tag IDOC BEGIN=</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Error: MSGGUID C834F5D4235B44BD373F9F12AA5B0674: Tag found instead of tag IDOC BEGIN=</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>

    Hi,
    IDOC multimapping (it's called bundling) is supported please fallow that Michal's blog:
    [/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change|/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change]
    You need to modify the xsd definition. It works perfect. E.g. in my company we are splitting 1000 idocs in one run.
    Best regards,
    Wojciech

  • Question IDoc-Messages

    Hi,
    I send an IDoc-Message from R3 to XI. So, in the transaction "sxmb_moni", I see in the field "ACK. Status" following entry:
    "Acknowledgement not possible"
    Is it possible to disabled this entry, so that the field "ACK Status" has no entries?
    Thanks.
    Regards
    Stefan

    Hi,
    idx_noale is not transaction,
    Whatever version you are using , just run SE38 and give the program name IDX_NOALE and give the port and Idoc message type, and check the changes by seeing the table
    IDXNOALE with the transaction SE16 - table name : IDXNOALE
    you can check these info in the below link - 3.4 section
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb
    Regards
    Chilla

  • Contract creation in Backend with Idoc message type BLAORD

    Hello,
    We are creating Backend contracts from the Bidding engine functionality. We only want to create backend contracts and did the necesary configuration.
    We activated BADI: BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
    Method CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE.
    We did not yet implement BADI:
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE in SRM 5.0
    In SAP R/3 Backend system (Version 46C) we see SAP is trying to create a contract via Idoc message Type: BLAORD.
    In the trx BD87 in the backend we get status 51 :
    Mesage number: 00 055
    "Make an entry in all required fields"
    In the segments of the Idoc however we do not see which field is missing!
    How can we best analise this problem. Or maybe anyone can give us a a hint what is missing.
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    Hello RRK,
    In ref. to your mentioning to change the backend configuration from WKK to MKK might not be as easy to do for organizations.  As those configurations effect the overall creation of purchasing document types in R/3. 
    The Key issue is why the "Target Value" in the Header of the SRM GOA does not get transferred to the R/3 contract.  That's why the issue is still there. 
    Were you guys able to figure out why that was missing? In the BLAORD IDoc the Target Value seems to not get transferred from SRM - its 0.00 if the IDoc is reviewed in WE19.  This seems to be the problem.
    Just wanted to know if you see the same issue in ur system.
    Thanks.
    Sunny.

  • EANCOM message : Separate channel per message sub-version

    Hello Experts,
    I have the following scenario:
    Flow 1 : ORDERS message  :  Dummy interface ( Sender AS2 channel ) -----> Dummy interface ( Receiver EDISeparator )
    Flow 2 :                                  SI_Orders_96AEAN008  ( Sender EDISeparator adapter ) ------------>   IDOC ( Receiver IDOC )
    Flow 3 :                             
    SI_Orders_96AEAN009  ( Sender EDISeparator adapter ) ------------>   IDOC ( Receiver IDOC )
    If you see, I need to configure 2 separate receiver communication channels based on message subversion to receiver 2 different messages; one CC for receiving EAN008 type of messages and one CC for receiving EAN009 type of messages. But the sender EDISeperator of type EANCOM does not have option to select the sub-version. Can you please tell how to configure 2 separate receiver channels per message sub-version.
    Thanks
    Saurabh

    Hi Piyush,
    My requirement is :
    Interface 1 : EDISeparator Sender Interface ( 96A-EAN008 ) ---> Mapping 1 ---> ZCNOSE_ORDERS.ORDER05
    Interface 2 : EDISeparator Sender Interface ( 96A-EAN010 ) ---> Mapping 2 ---> ZCNOSE_ORDERS.ORDER05
    There are around 21 GLN's sending messages of type 96A-EAN008 and 60 GLN's sending messages of type 96A-EAN010.
    As suggested by you in thread EANCOM message : Separate channel per message sub-version is that we have to use '|' as GLN separator. However since I have many GLN's, the option does not work for my scenario unless I create multiple communication channels with sets of GLN's in each communication channel.
    Will you agree that if the sender EDI separator adaptor had an option to choose the messag sub-version of the EANCOM message ( EAN008 / EAN010 ), then it would have been simple for me to create 1 Communicaiton channel such that all the messages of Interface 1 would use Mapping 1 and all the messages of Interface 2 would use Mapping 2 irrespective of any sender GLN.
    Thanks
    Saurabh

  • Idoc message type which contains all  data types & date format

    Hello experts,
    I have Two questions :
    1.Need Idoc message type which has all sap data types (24 types).
    2. I am getting output date in  31-05-1999, whereas am expecting 5/31/1999.
        is there anything to be done at system level, since same Func Mod gives expected output in 4.7 verions, whereas in ecc 6.0 version it doesnt.
    Thnx in advance

    Hi Taj,
      The date format usually depends upon the user settings in SAP. for this check your user settings... Go to menubar - > System - > user profile -> own data ->defaults tab -> change the date format in which you want.
    Or else.......
    There is a conversion exit to change the date in the format you wish to get.... use the Function Module  FORMAT_DATE_4_OUTPUT and give the date  and the format in which you want to print as input parameters.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ravikiran.

  • I'm trying to update my iphone 3GS to the 4.3.4 version and I am getting the error message "This version of itunes (version 9.1.1) is the current version.  How do I update my PHONE and why is an itunes update being confused for my iphone?

    I'm trying to update my iphone 3GS to the 4.3.4 version and I am getting the error message "This version of itunes (version 9.1.1) is the current version.  How do I update my PHONE and why is an itunes update being confused for my iphone?

    You need iTunes 10.0 or greater to update your phone...iTunes isn't confused at all. If you're on a Mac, you'll need OS X 10.5.8 or greater to update iTunes to 10.0 or greater.

  • I am trying to start DAC 11g server in AIX but getting erorr (MESSAGE:::Schema version is missing or old).

    OS detected: AIX
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:52 PM com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.DerivedConstants getDacDomainHome
    INFO: The DAC_DOMAIN_HOME set to /apps/DAC11g/dac
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:52 PM com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.DerivedConstants getDacConfigLocation
    INFO: The DAC_CONFIG_LOCATION value hasn't been found, the USERDIR value was used instead
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:52 PM com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.DerivedConstants getDacConfigLocation
    INFO: The DAC_CONFIG_LOCATION set to /apps/DAC11g/dac
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:52 PM com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.DerivedConstants getOracleDacHome
    INFO: The BI_ORACLE_HOME value hasn't been found, the USERDIR value was used instead
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:52 PM com.siebel.etl.etlmanager.DerivedConstants getOracleDacHome
    INFO: The ORACLEDIR set to /apps/DAC11g/dac
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:53 PM com.siebel.etl.bootup.ApplicationManager <init>
    INFO: Application booting up...
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:54 PM oracle.security.jps.internal.common.util.XmlSchemaValidationUtil$StrictErrorHandler warning
    WARNING: Failed to validate the xml content. SchemaLocation: schemaLocation value = 'http://xmlns.oracle.com/oracleas/schema/11/jps-config-11_1.xsd' must have even number of URI's. Location: line 2 column 272.
    Jan 14, 2014 4:33:56 PM com.siebel.etl.database.ConnectionManager init
    INFO: Creating repository pool
    Jan 14, 2014 4:34:00 PM com.siebel.etl.database.ConnectionManager init
    INFO: Repository pool created
    Jan 14, 2014 4:34:00 PM com.siebel.etl.net.QServer <init>
    GLOBAL: DAC Version: Dac Build AN 11.1.1.6.4.20121119.2022
    Jan 14, 2014 4:34:00 PM com.siebel.etl.net.QServer <init>
    GLOBAL: Process name: 18940116@lfx007qpa
    Jan 14, 2014 4:34:00 PM com.siebel.etl.net.QServer <init>
    GLOBAL: The System properties are: java.assistive       ON
    java.runtime.name       Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment
    ibm.signalhandling.rs   false
    sun.boot.library.path   /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/default:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64
    java.vm.version 2.4
    com.ibm.oti.configuration       scar
    java.vm.vendor  IBM Corporation
    java.vendor.url http://www.ibm.com/
    path.separator  :
    java.vm.name    IBM J9 VM
    user.country    US
    sun.java.launcher       SUN_STANDARD
    user.dir        /apps/DAC11g/dac
    java.vm.specification.name      Java Virtual Machine Specification
    java.runtime.version    pap6460sr9fp1-20110208_03 (SR9 FP1)
    java.fullversion        JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 AIX ppc64-64 jvmap6460sr9-20110203_74623 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
    J9VM - 20110203_074623
    JIT  - r9_20101028_17488ifx3
    GC   - 20101027_AA
    java.awt.graphicsenv    sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment
    java.endorsed.dirs      /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/endorsed
    os.arch ppc64
    com.ibm.vm.bitmode      64
    java.io.tmpdir  /tmp/
    line.separator
    com.ibm.util.extralibs.properties
    java.vm.specification.vendor    Sun Microsystems Inc.
    user.variant
    java.awt.fonts
    os.name AIX
    sun.java2d.fontpath
    java.jcl.version        20110203_01
    sun.jnu.encoding        ISO8859-1
    java.library.path       /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/default:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/default:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/j9vm:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64:/usr/java6_64/jre/../lib/ppc64:/apps/oracle/oraclehomes/11.2.0/lib:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/ODBC6.0/lib:.:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/usr/lib:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/oracle/oraclehomes/11.2.0/lib:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/ODBC6.0/lib:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/apps/Informatica9/9.0.1/server/bin:/usr/lib
    jxe.current.romimage.version    15
    com.ibm.oti.vm.bootstrap.library.path   /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/default:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64
    com.ibm.cpu.endian      big
    java.specification.name Java Platform API Specification
    java.class.version      50.0
    ibm.system.encoding     ISO8859-1
    java.util.prefs.PreferencesFactory      java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferencesFactory
    os.version      6.1
    com.ibm.oti.vm.library.version  24
    com.ibm.jcl.checkClassPath
    user.home       /home/snlmgr
    user.timezone   America/Los_Angeles
    java.awt.printerjob     sun.print.PSPrinterJob
    file.encoding   ISO8859-1
    java.specification.version      1.6
    user.name       snlmgr
    java.class.path ./lib/msbase.jar:./lib/mssqlserver.jar:./lib/msutil.jar:./lib/sqljdbc.jar:./lib/ojdbc6.jar:./lib/ojdbc5.jar:./lib/ojdbc14.jar:./lib/db2java.zip:./lib/teradata.jar:./lib/terajdbc4.jar:./lib/log4j.jar:./lib/tdgssjava.jar:./lib/tdgssconfig.jar:./lib/nzjdbc.jar:./lib/bijdbc.jar:./lib/ttjdbc6.jar:./lib/orai18n.jar:./lib/timestenjmsxla.jar:./lib/jms.jar:./lib/javax.jms.jar:./DAWSystem.jar:./lib/biacm.paramproducer.jar::./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.pki_11.1.1/oraclepki.jar:./lib/oracle_common/webservices/wsclient_extended.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jmx_11.1.1/jmxspi.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.odl_11.1.1/ojdl.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-internal.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-platform.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-se.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.idm_11.1.1/identitystore.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-az-rt.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jacc-spi.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.iau_11.1.1/fmw_audit.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jmx_11.1.1/jmxframework.jar:./lib/oracle_common/modules/oracle.igf_11.1.1/identitydirectory.jar::./lib/oracle_common/jlib/help-share.jar:./lib/oracle_common/jlib/ohj.jar:./lib/oracle_common/jlib/jewt4.jar:./lib/oracle_common/jlib/share.jar:./lib/oracle_common/jlib/oracle_ice.jar:
    com.ibm.oti.shared.enabled      false
    java.vm.specification.version   1.0
    sun.arch.data.model     64
    sun.java.command        com.siebel.etl.net.QServer
    java.home       /usr/java6_64/jre
    com.ibm.oti.jcl.build   20110202_1316
    user.language   en
    ibm.signalhandling.sigint       true
    java.specification.vendor       Sun Microsystems Inc.
    os.encoding     ISO8859-1
    oracle.security.jps.config      /apps/DAC11g/dac/conf/security/jps-config-jse.xml
    java.vm.info    JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 AIX ppc64-64 jvmap6460sr9-20110203_74623 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
    J9VM - 20110203_074623
    JIT  - r9_20101028_17488ifx3
    GC   - 20101027_AA
    java.version    1.6.0
    java.ext.dirs   /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ext
    jxe.lowest.romimage.version     15
    sun.boot.class.path     /usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ppc64/default/jclSC160/vm.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/annotation.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/beans.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/java.util.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/jndi.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/logging.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/security.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/sql.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmorb.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmorbapi.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmcfw.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/rt.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/charsets.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/resources.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmpkcs.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmcertpathfw.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmjgssfw.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmjssefw.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmsaslfw.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmjcefw.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmjgssprovider.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmjsseprovider2.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmcertpathprovider.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/ibmxmlcrypto.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/management-agent.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/xml.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/jlm.jar:/usr/java6_64/jre/lib/javascript.jar
    java.vendor     IBM Corporation
    file.separator  /
    java.compiler   j9jit24
    sun.io.unicode.encoding UnicodeBig
    ibm.signalhandling.sigchain     true
    Jan 14, 2014 4:34:00 PM com.siebel.etl.engine.core.ETLUtils logException
    SEVERE:
    ANOMALY INFO::: QServer will stop owing to repository version mismatch: Schema version is missing or old.
    Try upgrading repository.
    MESSAGE:::Schema version is missing or old.
    Try upgrading repository.
    EXCEPTION CLASS::: com.siebel.etl.upgrade1.VersionMismatchException
    com.siebel.etl.upgrade1.UpgradeUtils.isRepositoryValid(UpgradeUtils.java:96)
    com.siebel.etl.net.QServer.versionIntegrityCheck(QServer.java:461)
    com.siebel.etl.net.QServer.<init>(QServer.java:132)
    com.siebel.etl.net.QServer.main(QServer.java:499)

    (1) Download the Windows Installer CleanUp utility installer file (msicuu2.exe) from the following Major Geeks page (use one of the links under the "DOWNLOAD LOCATIONS" thingy on the Major Geeks page):
    http://majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4459
    (2) Doubleclick the msicuu2.exe file and follow the prompts to install the Windows Installer CleanUp utility. (If you're on a Windows Vista or Windows 7 system and you get a Code 800A0046 error message when doubleclicking the msicuu2.exe file, try instead right-clicking on the msicuu2.exe file and selecting "Run as administrator".)
    (3) In your Start menu click All Programs and then click Windows Install Clean Up. The Windows Installer CleanUp utility window appears, listing software that is currently installed on your computer.
    (4) In the list of programs that appears in CleanUp, select any iTunes entries and click "Remove", as per the following screenshot:
    (5) Quit out of CleanUp, restart the PC and try another iTunes install. Does it go through properly this time?

  • If I'm in Lightroom 5, and try to Edit in Photoshop CS6, I always get the following message: "This version of Lightroom may require the Photoshop Camera Raw plug-in version 8.6 for full compatibility." But I have updated to 8.6 and have no remaining updat

    If I'm in LIghtroom 5, and try to Edit in Photoshop CS6, I always get the following message: "This version of Lightroom may require the Photoshop Camera Raw plug-in version 8.6 for full compatibility." But I have updated to 8.6 and have no remaining updates. How can I fix this?
    If I click "Open Anyway" or "Render using Lightroom", I get the following message:
    "Adobe Photoshop CS6 cannot be opened because of a problem.
    Check with the developer to make sure Adobe Photoshop CS6 works with this version of OS X. You may need to reinstall the application. Be sure to install any available updates for the application and OS X."
    Please tell me what to do so I can edit from Lightroom to Photoshop.

    In Photoshop, if you choose Help - About Plug-in... - Camera Raw, does it say 8.6?
    Seems to me there was some hiccup they found in the update process, which prompted this:
    Camera Raw updates cannot be applied
    I honestly don't know if the problem could apply to 8.6 as well, which is why I asked you to check to make very sure you really got it.
    -Noel

  • I had downloaded and installed one of those automatic Windows update and now whenever I try to open my Firefox I get an error message, "Platform version 6.0.2 is not compatible with minVersion 6.0.1 maxVersion 6.0.1

    I had downloaded and installed one of those automatic Windows update and now whenever I try to open my Firefox I get an error message, "Platform version 6.0.2 is not compatible with minVersion >6.0.1 maxVersion <6.0.1

    If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then try to disable Virtualization.
    Do a clean reinstall and delete the Firefox program folder.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
    *[[/questions/869812]]
    *[[/questions/869951]]

  • How do you upload firmware to Airport extreme with the following message: This version of AirPort Utility requires this AirPort Extreme use firmware version 7.3.1 or later. Use AirPort Utility 5.6 to update this base station. I'm using airport utility 6.0

    The airport extreme at my parent's house has not had its firmware update in some time and it keeps dropping the internet connection and needing to be reset.
    I went to update firmware and opened up airport utilities (I'm running airport 6.0 on Mountain Lion, 10.7.4).  Everytime I open the airport utility I get the following message: "
    This version of AirPort Utility requires this AirPort Extreme use firmware version 7.3.1 or later. Use AirPort Utility 5.6 to update this base station. AirPort Utility 5.6 is available at AirPort Service and Support.
    I've followed the link and tried to update firmwares but none are available and the print says that airport utility will look to see if firmware are available and load them as necessary when prompted by user.
    One link said the only way to solve this problem is open up Airport Utility 5.6. I tried to do this, but 5.6 is not supported on Mountain Lion and couldn't be opened up.
    I'm getting the exact same message on my other computer, a Mac Air.
    So basically, can't download new firmware and am stuck with a ****** airport extreme that needs to keep being reset, a factory reset, in order to use the internet, but then continues to give me the same message.
    Thanks!

    See this article for instructions on how to install AirPort Utility 5.6 for Lion on Mountain Lion:
    http://www.macworld.com/article/1167965/mountain_lion_and_the_ancient_airport_ba se_station.html

  • WHEN RYING TO OPEN GETTING MESSAGE PLATFORM VERSION 8.0, MIN VERSION 7D MAX VERSION 7D

    ''duplicate of https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/903944''
    WHEN I TRY TO OPEN FIREFOX AS AN INTERNET BROWSER I GET A MESSAGE PLATOFORM VERSION 8.0 NO COMPATIBABLEW WITH MIN VERSION 7.D MAX VERSION 7.D

    I suggest you download a fresh copy from getthunderbird.com and reinstall. I do not know what has caused it, but a reinstall should refresh the files and fix it.

  • How can I output multiple IDOC messages in one dataflow in DS 3.2?

    Hi, we are trying to load some business partner data into CRM through an IDOC. The specific IDOC we are attempting to use is CRMXIF_PARTNER_SAVE_M02. We successfully created a Data Services flow which takes input from a file and can write out an IDOC message which updates the record in CRM. The problem is that we can only manage to run this job for one record at a time - if the file we are using for input contains 2 or more records (2 or more business partners which we are trying to update), then the batch job fails with the error message:
    IDoc Error: Message:      Adding this segment exceeds maximum allowed number of repetition E101CRMXIF_PARTNER_KEYS
    I'm guessing from this error message that it is trying to shove both business partner records into one IDOC which is not supported by this IDOC. Instead what we want it to do is send 2 IDOC messages to the server, one per business partner.
    Does anyone have any suggestions on how we can make this work?
    Thanks
    -Trevor

    Hi Werner,
    I am trying to load data into SAP for Functional Locations Domain using the 'FUNC_LOC_CHANGE' IDOC in Data Services and I am getting the following error.
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    |Data flow DF_ChangeIDOC|Loader FUNC_LOC_CHANGE01
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    IDoc target tried to generate IDoc <FUNC_LOC_CHANGE01> from NRDM data: <
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    IDoc Error: Message:      CIDocIterator::Field: No datarecord available for this segment type
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    IDoc Type:    FUNC_LOC_CHANGE01
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    Release:      731
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    IDoc Number:  Not Applicable
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    Segment Name:
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    Segment Type:
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    Field Name:   FUNCTLOCATION
    8236
    7776
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:36 PM
    >. Check your input data.
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    |Data flow DF_ChangeIDOC|Loader FUNC_LOC_CHANGE01
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    IDoc target tried to generate IDoc <FUNC_LOC_CHANGE01> from NRDM data: <
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    IDoc Error: Message:      CIDocIterator::Field: No datarecord available for this segment type
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    IDoc Type:    FUNC_LOC_CHANGE01
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    Release:      731
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    IDoc Number:  Not Applicable
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    Segment Name:
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    Segment Type:
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    Field Name:   FUNCTLOCATION
    6992
    8284
    R3C-244005
    2013/02/27 4:52:46 PM
    >. Check your input data.
    I am trying to update the ABCIndicator from 2 to 3 and hence have set the Flag to X in the source table as well. I have updated the EDI_DC40 mandatory schema with the necessary values and mapped the values to the schemas in the IDOC
    E1FUNC_LOC_CHANGE - from the source table 
    and sub schemas
    E1BP_ITOB - some from the source table and other values to NULL
    E1BP_ITOBX - FLAG X to the ABC Indicator from Source table and all others to NULL
    E1BP_ITOB_FL_ONLY - NULL for Everything
    E1BP_ITOB_FL_ONLYX - NUll for everything
    I have tried to play around the FROM cluase in the query as well as UNnesting...all of them failed to resolve the issue...Can you please suggest me where I am going Wrong..
    Thanks
    Chan

Maybe you are looking for