Idoc not created for a particular sales order

Hi,
For a particular sales order , idoc is not created .
The idoc has to be generated when we create a sales order ,
but for a particular sales order , the idoc is not generated when the sales order is created. The program is assigned in
nace for output type zd00.
RSNASTED is the program which triggers the idoc and FM: IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDRSP.
How to debug and see why the idoc is not generated,
i had kept break point in idoc_output_ordrsp function module
and program rsnasted, but my control does not
reaches this point.
can anyone help me in this issue.
Thanks and regards,
A. thirumaran.
Edited by: thirumaran a on Jul 22, 2008 1:35 PM

Hi,
Could you please check if the output is processed or not, whether in the output type what all conditions you have maintained e.g send immediately.
Reward me point if you find this helpful.
regds.......
Sumit

Similar Messages

Preventing update to COPA tables for a particular Sales order type

Hi ,
We need to have incoming sales order transfer to COPA activated only for one particular sales order type activated.
Earlier we implemented note 571697 for user exit to allow COPA update only for particular sales order type.
This prevented the transfer of SO to actuals table, but off late the performance for VA01 and VA02 has decreased substantially.
Upon checking, we found this is happening because of other CE4XXXX tables (excluding CE1XXXX) which are getting updated during creation/ change of SO. as the data in these tables is huge .
If possible, please advise, right userexit to prevent update to these tables.
Thanks.
Neeraj

Thanks for your inputs..I have few more queries on same.
Initially we had incoming sales order activated in KEKF allong with implemented SAP note 571697, which helped us to update CE1XXXX only for a particular sales order type. This was initial requirement to have system updating COPA values only for one particular sales order type.Also, KEQ3 was also activated which resulted in updates to CE4XXXX. This was not a problem initially since we had few sales orders now that plant has grown old with more sales order (resulting in huge size of CE4XXXX) VA01 is impacted..
Currently ,since we have KEQ3 activated so, Segment is created the moment we create sales order.. and table CE4XXXX is updated..
As most of you have suggested to switch off sales order in KEQ3, i need to analyze the impact of this..
From what i understand CE1XXXX will continue with updation for that order type... and CE4XXXX won't be updated in future..Please correct me if i am wrong..
Also, please advise what all can be possible impacts on COPA reporting if I switch off from now onwards (client has been using this since long) , and what all should be the precautions that i should take while doing this.
Thanks

CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle

Dear Experts,
I have 4 company codes in my controlling area. I did all CO-PA configuration. But CO-PA Document is generated in Only one company code. Remaining company codes CO-PA document is not created while doing the sale order cycle
Ive carried a standard sales cycle that contains sales order (VA01),
and (VF04,VF02). System should generate 4
documents as follows
1) FI Document
2) CO Document
3) Profit Center Accounting Document
4) COPA Document
But in my case for 3 company codes only 3 documents are generated instead of CO-PA. But for one company code 4 documents are generated.
In my case i did all settings Operation concern level and assign to controlling area. I can,t Understood why system is generating CO-PA document for Only one company
Please suggest me where i miss the settings..
Regards,
Krishna.V

Dear Ajay,
Cost element category is 01. Because hear is one another company they have FI only all transactions they maintain through FI only. so hear we maintain Cost elements category 01.
I think it is not a problem. because hear i got CO-PA document from one company. Remaining 3 company is not generated.
Hear we maintained all gl's chart of acc level and cost elements also.
Please suggest me...
Regards,
Krishna. v

BP replication not happening for a particular sales area.

The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
However for other sales areas it flows.
Where should I look to resolve this situation. All entries in PPOMA etc are rightly made and untouched.
Thanks and regards,
Tariq

Hi
The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
DJ>> Hope the required sales area is available in CRM.
The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
DJ>> Please check the following -
1. Create a BP in CRM (with the sold-to party role) with the required Sales area and see if this customer when replicated to ECC has the relevant Sales Area. Ideally it should get replicated if all you middleware settings are fine.
2. See you have not set a filter for a specific Sales Area and becuase of that BP is getting replicate but not the sales area.
Hope this will help
Regards

Accounting entry against Excise invoice not created for Service Tax sales

Dear all,
I am facing one problem related to accounting entry against excise invoice not created, for service tax sales scenario in SEZ plant.
Accounting entry against billing document is generated,which contains revenue account-Debit entry,service tax 10% --Debit entry,ECS-Service tax 2% --Debit entry, SECess Service Tax 1% --Debit entry & Sundry Debtors (Reco) - Domestic(Customer receivable reconciallation) account-Credit entry.
But after generating excise invoice, accouning entries not generated for clearing of Cenvat suspense entry(i.e.service tax 10% ,ECS-Service tax 2% , SECess Service Tax 1%) which is generated during billing document.
Plz. suggest step by step guideline to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Mukesh Pardeshi

Hi ReazuddinMD,
thanks for your reply and support...I checked all the entries/accounts maintained correct.. but the Accounting entrys against Excise invoice not created..
Now i am geeting error as below at the time of saving Excise invoice,
No account is specified in item 0000000001
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
System Response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.

Need IDOC and segment for mappping the sales order number

Hi,
we need the IDOC name and segment for mapping the sales order number created by oracle in sap for transaction VA01.
Whether the sales order number created by Oracle can be used to create the sales order in sap using the idoc ACC_SALES_ORDER01?
. If we can do,then what is the segment and field for the sales order number in the idoc ?
Please reply asap it's very urgent
Thanks
Edited by: suresh kumar nandhagopal on May 16, 2008 12:07 PM

Hi,
IDOC for sales order is ORDERS05. Segment E1EDKA1, for field go to SE11 and enter E1EDKA1 to find field for sales order.
Cheers.
...Reward if useful.

Payment terms for a particular sales order

Dear Gurus,
I want to trigger a particular payment term for a particular sales document type.
i.e., when i create a sales order with this particular sales document type the desired payment term should be copied into sales order by default. Is this possible.. please suggest.
thanks
suri

Dear Suri
As you would be aware, by default, Payment Term will flow in sale order from customer master. However, if you want to have a different payment term to flow automatically, then you have try with any of the following user exits.
User exits in the program MV45AFZZ - USEREXIT_READ_DOCUMENT
User-Exits in program MV45AFZB - USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Issues in Web service created for updating the Sales Order

Hi All,
We created a Web service using the Web service tool in CRM 7.0 ( Using the Component WS_DESIGN_TOOLS )
Web service was created for three modes such as READ, CREATE and CHANGE Modes.
READ Web Service we tested and its working fine as we were able to see the data for an existing Sales Order in the Web Service.
We expect that the Change Web Service will update the data of an existing Sales Order.
Through our Web service we are passing the Order GUID ,Order ID and some Header Fields as well as Item Fields but the in the Web Service we are getting a message that Web service executed successfully but the CRMD_ORDERADM_H Table isnot getting updated.
What could be problem.
Any suugestions will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Sijo

Hi Gourav,
I checked in SICF for the Webservice name created.
this is the service path
/default_host/sap/bc/srt/rfc/sap/ for the corresponding Web Service created in DEV 200 Client.
I checked in SOAMANAGER and saw that the endpoitnts were zero.
the Search Operation for Webservice have got three query fields mainly
Object Id, Posting Date,Procees Type
If we give Process Type
sign - blank
option - blank
low - YPO ( Custom )
High - blank we are getting 126 entries.
and if we check for the Process Type YPO (Custom ) in CRMD_ORDERADM_H Tbale also we are getting the same no of entries.
but only for option BT , for Posting Date issue is thr..
Any inputs to move forward will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Sijo.
Edited by: sijokjohn85 on Mar 5, 2010 10:52 PM

IDOCs not created for Payment method "P" and "B"

Dear Experts,
I have executed the Automatic Payment program for three payment methods (P,V and B - Foreign Currency) in one Run ID. Payment run was successful but it has created IDOCs for the documents / Vendors attached with payment method "V" but IDOCs were not created for the payment methods "P" and "B". I have checked the configuration relating to payment methods and those were assigned with Form details and the maximum amount is also defined in the payment methods.
Can any one suggest me where I had made the mistake / where I need to check the configuration settings.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Ramnath.

Hi Surya,
Please find below error log created while executing the Payment run for the issue.
Step 002 started (program SAPFPAYM_SCHEDULE, variant &0000000116195, user ID V-PIZHA)
Step 003 started (program RFFOEDI1, variant &0000003957078, user ID V-PIZHA)
Maintain an output device in your user master record
Job cancelled
Thanks and Regards,
Ramnath,
SAP FIMM Team

Repeat credit check does not happen for already released sales orders when CMGST =D, for the second time using FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK

Hi,
I have written a routine which will call the FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK whenever there is a rejection and again unrejection of a same sales order, we are only concerned about already credit released sales orders, the scenario is as follow
1). Sales order created in the system --> Credit check --> Credit blocked
2). Release credit block manually CMGST =D
3). Reject sales order then unreject the same
4) Routine will determine rejection and unrejection of the order while saving and will call the FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK
5) The order is credit checked and blocked if necessary
All goes well till this point
but when the same sales order is rejeceted and unrejected multiple times either partially/ fully then the Custom routine calls the FM for credit check but the FM fails to put the order back on credit hold
in short the FM works only for the first time incase of mutiple rejection and unrejection of teh same sales order then the FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_CHECK fails to put the order back on credit hold from the second time onwards
if some one any idea of the behavior of this FM please share your thoughts and inputs . thanks !!

Issue resolved
The Standard FM “SD_ORDER_CREDIT _CHECK” uses the field “Release date of the document determined by credit management VBAK – CMFRE”
For any sales order that is manually credit released in a single day, Only one credit check is triggered (per day) if there is any change in the sales order and then the order goes back to credit hold and if again the order is manually credit released for the second time in a single day there will be no credit check (still the order will pass into FM but the update entry in the internal table will be blank)this is a standard functionality
Process of rejection and unrejection :
Blocked order -->released-->blocked again (first time after manual release same day) unrejected (same day) -->but no credit check (all this in a single day)
note : OVA8 - released document still unchecked = 0 Days , Deviation %= blank

2 deliveries created for the same sales order

2 Return Del docs & 2 credit notes were created for one return order no.
Posted: Apr 17, 2008 5:33 PM       E-mail this message      Reply
Dear SAP Support,
I would like to know why does the system created 2 return deliveries with the same qty for a single return order document no.? One return delivery doc.no. was created 2 mins earlier than the 2nd return delivery document no. on the same day. After these 2 return deliveries were created, a credit note was also created for each return delivery doc. number. Here is the document flow:
On Jan. 10, 2008, the Return Order was created
The Delivery block field is set to 90- (Return block)
The Billing block field is blank
On Jan. 14, 2008 @ 12:08:44, the 1st return delivery doc. no. was created. And on the same day also @ 12:10:44, the 2nd delivery doc. was again created. These 2 deliveries were created by 2 users. 1st delivery is by manual job, the 2nd is by background job processing. there was a 2 mins. interval for these 2 deliveries.
On Jan. 21, 2008 @ 9:47:33, the 1st Credit Return Note was created. And on the same day also @ 9:48:00, the 2nd Credit Return Note was again created.
In my initial investigation, I found out that there were changes made on the return order document before the 2 return delivery documents were created. Below are the changes that happened:
On Jan. 14, 2008, @ 9:25:22 hour, the following changes occurred:
a) Delivery block was changed from 90 - (Return block) to blank
b) Billing block was changed from blank to 08 - (check credit memo)
On Jan. 14, 2008, @ 12:08:44, T-Inv Comb field was changed from DC to C
On Jan. 21, 2008, @ 9:47:20, the Billing Block was changed again from 08 - (check credit memo) to blank
Will the above changes, contribute to this issue?
I am also suspecting that the timing on the creation of deliveries via manual job and scheduled background job processig could be the root cause because of the slim time frame between the two job?
I hope you can help me get an explanation to this and how this can be avoided.
Thank you very much in advanced for your help on this matter.
Hoping to hear from you soon.
Kind regards,
Cynthia M. Ondillo
SAP SD Functional Support

Hello Jonathan,
Yes, the 'update document flow' box is ticked and the entry in the 'Pos./negative quantity' field is '+'
Target delivery type is LR - Returns Delivery    Source sls doc. type is ZRE - Coats Returns Order
Item category is ZREN - Coats Returns Item
Since we do not see anything missing in the above setting, can we say that it is a system bug when running manual delivery job close to the time for running the scheduled background job?
If it is a system bug, how can this be corrected?
Regards,
Cynthia

Seggragating Deliveries created for STO and Sales Order

Hi Friends,
I have a requirement..
I am looking for list of deliveries in LIPS table. But I find that this table lists all deliveries created for STOs as well as Sales order. My requirement is to select only those deliveries which are created for Sales orders. Can anybody tell me how to seggragate the deliveries for sales order from deliveries created for STOs? Any other table should I look for deliveries created only for sales order?
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Satya

Hi Satya,
If you need table level data then you can go with method suggested by Andy Slania or if you have access to SQVI, you can join VBFA and LIKP tables and decide on your choice of search and list display. You can save the query for future use.
-Naminator

Different Tax base in pricing procedure for a single sales order for different line item material.

Hi,
I have a scenario wherein in a sales order, for two different material, the tax base of pricing should get triggered on the basis of sold to party and the material entered at line item level.
Logic triggers on the basis of Region of Customer & a unique field in the Material Master but problem comes in the calculation of Tax base as the sequence of condition type (from – to) is already defined in the pricing procedure to pick from a particular step but in second line item the base is different i.e. the sequence of condition types that are maintained in pricing procedure should be different for Tax to calculate differently.
Kindly suggest if the same can be handled in a single pricing procedure and dynamically taking care of condition type sequence through Alt Cal Base Formula, so far I’ve tried both Alt Cal Formula & Base but it is not working
Client doesn’t want to go ahead by creating two different orders (through separate Pricing Procedure) for that. They want to have both materials in same order.
Kindly suggest a suitable way to handle this scenario.
Regards,
Aashika Agarwal

Hi,
Click on the ''check availability'' button at item overview and then click on ''One-time delivery'' on the top. This will ensure that you will have only one delivery for whatever quantity is confirmed on that date.
If you want to apply this rule for all orders across a sales area, then you can do the below configuration step :
SPRO->sales and distribution->basic functions->availability check with ATP logic->Define default settings-> Here in avail. checking rule select A (one time delivery). This will ensure that all orders created for a particular sales area will have only one delivery.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Palani

All the pricing conditions are not visible for a given sales area, material

Hello All,
There is a customized screen with sales area(Sales org, distribution channel and division), material and sold to party. There is buttton when we click it has to display the pricing conditions. The problem here is it is not displaying all the conditions some conditions like ZB02 and MWST are missing. The Function module used is PRICING.
Whereas in VA03 tranaction for a sales order created with this sales area, material it is showing all the conditions for a item.
Please help me to solve this issue.
Many Thanks,
Rama

Hi
The BP's created for one particular sales area are not getting replicated into CRM, though before sometime it was happening.
DJ>> Hope the required sales area is available in CRM.
The BP with the "general data", and "role of sold to party" only flows but not with the sales area. There is no BDoc error in the SMW01 either. While displaying BP for the role of sold to party, it shows "Sold-to-party(maintained)" but the sales area entries though maintained for this sales area in the ECC, do not flow to the CRM.
DJ>> Please check the following -
1. Create a BP in CRM (with the sold-to party role) with the required Sales area and see if this customer when replicated to ECC has the relevant Sales Area. Ideally it should get replicated if all you middleware settings are fine.
2. See you have not set a filter for a specific Sales Area and becuase of that BP is getting replicate but not the sales area.
Hope this will help
Regards

Backend Tables for Chargeback regarding Sales Order.

Hi,
I am Searching for the tables Chargeback Data regarding Sales Orders, and also Joins for sales tables.
Can any one help me in this.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Vamsi...
Edited by: 965678 on Apr 29, 2013 6:05 AM
Edited by: 965678 on Apr 29, 2013 6:42 AM

Thanks for your inputs..I have few more queries on same.
Initially we had incoming sales order activated in KEKF allong with implemented SAP note 571697, which helped us to update CE1XXXX only for a particular sales order type. This was initial requirement to have system updating COPA values only for one particular sales order type.Also, KEQ3 was also activated which resulted in updates to CE4XXXX. This was not a problem initially since we had few sales orders now that plant has grown old with more sales order (resulting in huge size of CE4XXXX) VA01 is impacted..
Currently ,since we have KEQ3 activated so, Segment is created the moment we create sales order.. and table CE4XXXX is updated..
As most of you have suggested to switch off sales order in KEQ3, i need to analyze the impact of this..
From what i understand CE1XXXX will continue with updation for that order type... and CE4XXXX won't be updated in future..Please correct me if i am wrong..
Also, please advise what all can be possible impacts on COPA reporting if I switch off from now onwards (client has been using this since long) , and what all should be the precautions that i should take while doing this.
Thanks

Idoc not created for a particular sales order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for