IDOC Sender Adapter and Receiver Adapter

Hi,
Why we don't require IDOC Sender Adapter to communicate with PI and why IDOC Receiver Adapter is required to communicate with SAP ?
Regards,
J Augastine

Hi,
>>>Why we don't require IDOC Sender Adapter to communicate with PI
you're talking about sender and receiver agreements right ?
as this adapter is based on abap stack - with new functionalities of IDOC adapter
require sender agreement
>>>and why IDOC Receiver Adapter is required to communicate with SAP ?
as we need to put the RFC to the destination system somewhere...
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Similar Messages

  • PI 7.1 Sender Interface and Receiver Interface  gets interchanged

    Hi All,
    I m facing a strange problem in PI 7.1
    For many of my scenarios, the Sender Interface, sender namespace and receiver Interface, receiver namespace  information gets interchanged and displayed incorrectly.
    But sometimes its working fine.
    When we analysed the Log messages, found that, after xml validation step, the sender and reciever interface gets interchanged.
    Any idea why this happens?
    How to rectify this error?

    Aarthi,
    Please check your message interfaces once again. Sender is outbound and Receiver is inbound.
    Also please check your receiver determination.
    Regards,
    ---Satish

  • Sender DEBIT and receiver DEBIT

    Dear all,
    I notice in settlement, there are 2 button : sender and receiver. Now, what confused me is why both also called sender debit and receiver debit?
    Why both also DEBIT?
    Please advise me.
    Thanks

    Dear All,
    I see mostly it is like that where sender debit and receiver debit. If you go into KO88 previous settlement, you will get this.
    I read in forum also it is explaining in debit.
    You assign the debit cost element groups to a settlement cost element.
    You settle by cost element - that is, the debit cost element is the settlement cost element.
    so i would like to know why the title is sender debit and receiver debit. why both debit.
    thanks

  • Regarding Sender query and receiver query

    Hi Masters
          I have one sender query and receiver query. Both queries contain G/L account.
    First I got sender query report, in this report I drill down one free charactteristics field to get correponding field sales document in receiver report.
    Is it mandatory which field i drill down in sender report should be in receiver report?
    Could you please help ?
    Thanks in Advance
    Raja.S

    I would rewrite the first one to:
    Select t.id_entity,t.id_trade_ref,p.am_stock
    from trade t,posting p
    where t.id_trade_ref = '5V973781B'
    and p.id_trade_ref = t.id_trade_ref
    This way, you really make the join between the table.
    I think the join is better because it uses less code. I do not think you will notice much performance win between one or the other, especially because it concerns only a few rows.

  • Send Task and Receive Task

    In our beta test, we came upon several issues, one of them is when we create a BPMN process that consists of the following simple flow: Start -> User Task 1 -> Send Task -> User Task 2 -> Receive Task -> User Task 3 -> End
    When we deploy and run the flow, it always stops at the Receive Task. But when we remove User Task 2 from the flow and redeploy and run, the process runs fine all the way to the end. I am wondering if this is a bug in BPM 11g where if you put an activity between Send Task and Receive Task, it does not work, but when you do not have a task between Send Task and Receive Task, it works fine. Can someone confirm this scenario please?
    Within the Send Task and Receive Task, we are invoking a BPEL process that has a simple asynchronous service. The Send Task invokes the BPEL process, and the Receive Task has the callback to the BPEL process.
    Makes sense?
    Thanks.

    What does the bpel process do? Does it work with a synchronous bpel process?
    I think you should submit an SR for this since it works when there is no activity between the send/receive.
    Heidi.

  • I need an application that will enable my ipad to receive calls, make calls , send sms and receive sms. line2 is not available in south africa

    i need an application that will enable my ipad to receive calls, make calls send sms and receive sms. line2 is not available in south africa

    Skype would be a possibility for phone calls, though I don't know if it's available in SA. Search the iTunes Store for "SMS" and you'll quickly see if there are any SMS apps you can try.
    Regards.

  • IDOC sender adapter

    Hi all,
                i am configuring IDOC adapter i can c sender side of the adapter also available (i am using SP12 of PI),before it used to be disable state but now sender also active.
    If we sending IDOC do we have to create sender adapter also..
    Regards
    Rao

    Hi,
    and how to configure when i receive IDocs from non-SAP System via program directly
    RFC-Destination of type T (TCP/IP) and registerd Server program?!
    any experience?!
    br

  • Suppress Acknowledgment from PI IDoc Sender Adapter

    Hi,
    i m sending IDocs from SAP ECC to PI. Sometimes (!?) the PI Idoc (Inbound) Adapter sends back an acknowledgment. This leads to red flags in ECC / WE02 as the corresponding partner profile is not there. We dont want to set that up as it would give us a not wished status change.
    How can i suppress automatic acknwoledgments from PI IDoc adapter?
    (this has nothing to do with IDX_NOALE)
    Regards,
    Udo

    Hi,
    of course you are right.
    There is only one more thing I could suggest:
    In general, acknowledgments have to be requested explicitly by the sender. However,
    this does not apply to IDocs. The following acknowledgments are sent back by default:
    u2022 System error acknowledgment.
    u2022 Application acknowledgment.
    u2022 Application error acknowledgment.
    To change the default request setting, the corresponding message type has to be
    maintained in an exception table. Prior to SAP NetWeaver '04s Exchange
    Infrastructure SPS09, the exception table has to be explicitly edited. As of SAP
    NetWeaver '04s Exchange Infrastructure SPS09, a program is provided to configure
    the acknowledgment requests (see chapter 3.4).
    (It's from this document: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb&overridelayout=true)
    Regards
    Patrick

  • Are sending box and receiving box IDOC same?

    my sending client is Box1, receiving client is Box2, every month, we send GL balance from box1 to box2 thrugh IDOC
    I compare WE82, WE30, SM59, WE20, all setting are same in BOX1 and Box2. I doubt this, in SM59, we only maintain RFC connection to Box2 in both Box1 and Box2.
    Are the above correct? under what circustance, we should maintain different configuration in box1 and box2 for GL balance transmission?

    Hi anand,
    in we 19 when you send the idoc, the sender port refers to the port used by R3 to send the idoc and the reciver port is the port used by XI to recive the idocs.
    If you are going to use the same sender and receiver port, then where is your idoc being sent from r3 back to r3??
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Java IDOC_AAE configuration issue in PI IDOC sender channel and in ECC SM58.

    Dear Experts,
    My configuration scenario is  outbound:   SAP (IDOC)-------->PI------->AS2 ThirdParty.
    SAP PI version: 7.31 dual stack.
    First time i have done IDOC_AAE settings done in ECC and PI NWA with the help of below links.
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-34155
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-31398
    While sending the DESADV.DELVRY05 standard idoc from ECC to PI i am getting below error in Sender IDoc channel.
    Could you please help me on this issue ,I will appriciate you .This is very urgent.
    Error in PI IDOC Sender channel : Processing error = Value with name ApplyCntlRecFromPayload not available
    and I are getting below error in SM58 ECC system.
    Error in  ECC SM58: Commit fault: ASJ.ejb.005043 (Failed in component:
    Thanks,
    Aadi

    Hi Aadi,
    Please check the below SAP notes
    1952406 - "Commit fault" error in SM58 transaction when sending IDOC from backend system to PI sender Java IDOC adapter
    1928302 - Possible NullPointerException with IDOC_AAE sender channels processing
    reference - Commit fault: ASJ.ejb.005043 (Failed in component: sap.com/com.sap.aii.ad) while sending to PI system
    also check the link - http://saphelp.me/commit-fault-asj-ejb-005043/
    regards,
    Harish

  • Sender system and Receiver system

    Hi,
    I have installed xi on on the server name is XI1 and there is two client 001 and 300. i have created xisuper user on 001. Pls tell me which is sender system or receiver system and xi system.
    Please give me some secnario
    Thannks

    Hi,
    you can Use Either (001 or 300 )one of the client for XI Perspective.
    And you can send the data through this Client in Xi to any Application
    Example:
    if you want to send the data from FTP Server to SAP R/3 (100 Client)means
    Here You can use either 001 or 300 client of XI as Middleware to send the data to SAP R/3
    in this case
    Your sender is the FTP Server(File Adapter)--XI is the Middleware--SAP R/3(100 Client) is the Receiver
    Regards
    Seshagiri

  • Mail sending issue and receiving sound intermittent

    I have three mail accounts on the 3G iPhone if that matters.
    The primary SMTP server I have setup for when using email at home on wi-fi. Set up the same as on the Mac to the ISP I connect to. Works fine sending and receiving on the iPhone.
    Under other SMTP servers I have set to reflect the mobile provider I connect to when not on wi-fi.
    The only way I can send mail using the mobile provider is to turn off the primary server.
    The instructions on the screen say " If mail is unsuccessful using the primary server it will try the other SMTP servers in succession. Clearly not doing this as if it can't connect using the primary server it doesn't continue searching through other servers.
    Anyone else experiencing the same problem?
    In addition the sound on receiving mail is intermittent and generally doesn't work. If it does it only works the one and then only one of the three accounts. And then goes away again.
    I was hoping that the 2.1 update may have fixed both of these.

    Bump

  • (RFC vs files), where Sender SAP and receiver multiple system

    Publish and Subscribe using  BPM or Without BPM (RFC vs files), where Sender SAP and receivers multiple system,.
    This is my 1st BPM scenario in sandbox system
    For this scenario
    I Created 2 Data types
    2 MT,
    Service interface:
    Request interface Mode:Asynchronous
    Abstract Req interface,Mode:Asynchronous
    Response Interface,Mode:Asynchronous
    Abstract Respomse Interface ,Mode:Aysnchronous
    Synchronous Interface ,Mode:Synchronous
    2 Message mapping for Req and Resp
    1 Operation Mapping
    BPM design: Plz find the attatchement
    Can anyone please help me how many Interface determinations,receiver determinations ,sender agreements,receiver agreements need to create for this.......
    It will be good if anyone send the BPM design flow for this.........
    can we do this scenario without BPM?
    Regards
    A.Muni kumar
    Edited by: Muni 1234 on Jan 31, 2012 10:24 AM

    Hi
    Receiver is FTP only.....
    SAP side is RFC.........
    RFC sender will be initiating the scenario, and there is receiver is File, PI should go to file directory and take the file then send it back to RFC as response.
    Sender: RFC
    Receiver: File
    1. is this scenario with condition based routing.. so that each time outof many receiver systems it will trigger any specific system.
    if above is the case then you can achive this without BPM also..
    Yes...its condition based routing...
    I Used async in this scenario.....sender side configurations also done....
    But when when I am triggering BAPI from SE37 I am getting an error
    Exception SYSTEM_FAILURE
    Message ID: 00 Message number: 341
    Message:
    Runtime error CALL_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND has occurred
    How to Solve this????
    I checked the RFC destination which i created in TCP/IP..a nd i mentioned the same in se37 RFC target system..
    Connection is Ok
    Or we need to create proxy for MI and report for this?
    Edited by: Muni 1234 on Feb 1, 2012 8:38 AM

  • HT201320 Trying to send mail and receiving error msg "the recipient was rejected by the server"

    Setting up new email account and getting above MSG when trying to send. Can receive mail ok to the account. Can send/receive fine to other accounts on the device.

    Try going into Settings > Mail, Contacts, Calendars > select the account > account name , tap on SMTP (under the 'Outgoing Mail Server' heading) and then tap on your Primary Server and try entering your email account and password and see if it then works

  • IDOC Sender Adapter acknoledgements

    Hi,
    we have a scenario IDOC -> PI => HTTP Plain (ASync) .
    I have configured the Message Type ALEAUD and AUD1 in sender system.
    I also have the ACK_SYSTEM_FAILURE = 1
    Now , when I get a permanent error from the HTTP receiver adapter. The acknolegement message falls in error .
    The message says that the Receiver component (HTTP system) canot be converted into an ALE logical system.
    What is missing... I thought we didn't have to define the external system anywhere except as a Business Component in Integration Builder ... ?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    thanks... it worked, now the ALEAUD IDOC is sent back to ERP but the status of the outbound IDOC is not changed.
    In fact in WE02 on ERP , the message is that the EDI interchange accord is not created for the thirds party's logical system (that's the one that had the http error) ...
    Now , since I'm planning to have possible 50 third party systems, I'm hoping we don't have to define a accord for each third party.
    Can't it just be set to some generic value ??? or done more elegantly ... I thought this should be a lot simpler to maintain.
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for