IDOC sticks in XI - forever?

Hi,
an Idoc sticks in the XI system for over 7 days. Is there a chance to restart that message?
The queue entry shows that:
Caller
XIAPPLUSER
Function Module
IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS
Target System
CRP_100
Date Time
18.01.2006 11:00:23
Status text
Transaction executing
Transaction ID
C0A83D0E0D9C43CE11B70077
The column outbound status in SXMB_MONI shows a green flag with tooltip "message scheduled on outbound side".
That message definitly did not receive the target system - I have checked that.
I couldnt restart from SXMB_MONI: You cannot restart XML message
49A3CD43AA2DF502E1000000C0A83D0E with this
status/type -> can I change the status, so that a restart is possible?????
What can I do?
Is there a way to monitor such errors/problems within XI (CCMS...)?
Many thanks for every help!
Regards,
Christian

Hi Michal,
SMQ1 and SMQ2 are empty - nothing at all.
But if I start the TRFC monitor (SMQS) I can see the entry described above. Should I execute "execute LUW" from the "Edit" menu or "Reset status" from the "Edit" menu??
Thanks and regards,
Christian

Similar Messages

If you are a professional, FCPX is unusable

First of all, I'm not in the target group for this app. I'm a video professional, I run a post production studio. This is, despite the name, an upgraded iMovie and has little to do with Final Cut. It has tons of more features than iMovie, but that doesn't change the fact that this is an app for the beginner, hobbyist and not the video professional. If it was called iMovie Pro I would not object. But calling this Final Cut, giving this app the name of this brilliant, but aged, peace of software is nothing short of misleading marketing.
We cannot use an app which main screen is dominated by the message "Import iMovie events". We cannot use an app where you use drop down menus to select resolution. This makes me concerned, what will this leave us? I decided to leave Avid behind long ago, and I definitely haven't changed my mind. Premiere? Maybe in the future, but it still feels too clumsy. I guess we have to stick to good, but flawed and old, Final Cut Pro 7. Just the way we use QuickTime Pro 7 and not QuickTime X.
When Vista came I decided that we couldn't use that and we couldn't stick with XP forever. So we made the switch to OS X, despite the fact that 3D and compositing apps were lagging behind on the system. We did it because we felt there was no future in Windows for us, we couldn't stick with an old system. Now, sadly, I feel the exact same about Final Cut, except I have no other system to go to.
If you are a video professional, I strongly advice you not to buy this app, despite the low price. If you are a hobbyist that like iMovie and want more powerful features, you will love this app.
And, Apple, if you find ONE video editor working on a professional level (no, not a wedding photographer or hobbyist music video maker) that does not agree with the above, please let him explain to me why I'm wrong.

I have been an Editor and Assitant editor working in network television for many many years now. After working with FCP a few times on some independent projects and being fed up with Avid's pomposity and arrogance I started urging shows to start using FCP. And in fact, a few years ago convinced a very prominent production company that it was time to ditch the idea of renting Avids everytime they went into post production on a show and to take the costs of a one season's worth of Avid rentals in order to purchase their own Macs running FCP and an XSan. I worked in concert with Apples Pro Apps point people to show the Producers how a tapeless workflow in FCP would not only save them a large amount of money in equipment, but the additional control over delivery would also save them thounds per episode by doing more of the finish work in-house rather than at a costly post production facility. Imagine my disappointment to discover that my loyalty to, and promotion of, Apple's products is being rewarded by by having Apple make that progression towards FCP pointless in the long run. While for the time being, we can certainly use FCP7 to continue to professionalt cut and finish a show, that will come end rapidly as support dries up for FCP and future OS's leave it behind. There is no way I can tell that same producer at this point that we can do shows in what I now view as iCut Enthusiast. I'd have to tell everyone on the Post team that they need to jump through hoops finding workarounds for the same things that were virtually effortless to do before.
Apple has frequently missed opportunites to corner the profesional film and television market and this move proves why they will never do so. They have no conept or concern for what a truly professional tool set needs to be. They have done what Avid folks have been predicting for years. Dumbing down the product in order to sell more software and promote the use of their hardware by bring things to their iOS world.

Kernel panic in os x.5

I have never had a problem with sudden crashes with my mac or os x. In fact, that's why I preffered os x to windows and had decided to make mac my primary computer.
However, in the past few days, I have had 3 "kernel panics" which have crashed my computer. Being technologically illiterate, I googled my problem by copying the words from the error, and I found out it is the mac equivalent of the spontaneous "Blue screen of death" error in windows os. As much as I appreciate how the developers at apple have made the sudden crash error more aesthetically pleasing than its windows cousin, I would like it to stop.
Below, I have copied and pasted the readout of the errors (saved in Library/Logs/PanicReporter) in chronological order of occurance. Can anyone who is more tech savvy than I am tell me how to stop this from happening? I have not downloaded or installed any hardware or software lately.
The only change I made was bringing the mac pro tower home for the memorial day vacation (5 hour drive) to my parents house, and installing mac drivers for a belkin wireless network adapter. Any help would be appreciated.
~Bryan
Error readouts from Library/Logs/PanicReporter:
Sun May 25 01:32:57 2008
panic(cpu 3 caller 0x0039A8F1): "m_free: freeing an already freed mbuf"@/SourceCache/xnu/xnu-1228.4.31/bsd/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:3574
Backtrace, Format - Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
0x81393648 : 0x12b0f7 (0x4581f4 0x8139367c 0x133230 0x0)
0x81393698 : 0x39a8f1 (0x48fb60 0x84b9d000 0x105cf000 0x0)
0x81393718 : 0x84b82d0b (0x7d06c500 0x7d06c500 0x0 0x1)
0x81393828 : 0x84b82e64 (0x84b9d000 0x84b9d000 0x7d06c500 0x2)
0x81393888 : 0x84b83036 (0x84b9d000 0x84b9d000 0x0 0x55a6)
0x813938b8 : 0x84b84187 (0x84b9d000 0x84b9d000 0x7d06c500 0x41e94e)
0x813938d8 : 0xbb1186 (0x84b9d000 0x7d06c500 0x0 0x41f18d)
0x81393908 : 0x42004a (0xc345300 0xc345300 0xbf117d0 0x8139398c)
0x81393938 : 0xbb122b (0xbf0b4c0 0xbb113a 0xc345300 0xbf117d0)
0x81393968 : 0xbb14c4 (0xc345300 0xbf117d0 0x8139398c 0x1a7bc9)
0x813939a8 : 0xbb199a (0xc345300 0x206 0x813939d8 0x228006)
0x813939d8 : 0xbace0b (0xc345300 0x7d06c500 0x0 0x0)
0x81393a18 : 0x215b05 (0xc579a04 0x7d06c500 0x11b26614 0x81393a58)
0x81393a98 : 0x227cc4 (0xc579a04 0x2 0x7d06c500 0x11a8c1c8)
0x81393ac8 : 0x241883 (0xc579a04 0x2 0x7d06c500 0x11a8c1c8)
0x81393c18 : 0x24841f (0x7d06c500 0x1 0x0 0x11abfdfc)
Backtrace continues...
Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies):
com.Ralink.driver.RT73(1.1.7)@0x84b68000->0x84b9cfff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x60c000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(1.6.0)@0xba2000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(1.6.0)@0xba2000->0xbb7fff
BSD process name corresponding to current thread: Transmission
Mac OS version:
9C7010
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.2: Tue Mar 4 21:17:34 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.4.31~1/RELEASE_I386
System model name: MacPro1,1 (Mac-F4208DC8)
Sun May 25 15:18:36 2008
panic(cpu 1 caller 0x0039A8F1): "m_free: freeing an already freed mbuf"@/SourceCache/xnu/xnu-1228.4.31/bsd/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:3574
Backtrace, Format - Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
0x91f37ac8 : 0x12b0f7 (0x4581f4 0x91f37afc 0x133230 0x0)
0x91f37b18 : 0x39a8f1 (0x48fb60 0xf62e280 0x64 0x64)
0x91f37b98 : 0x81362d0b (0x7ce5a800 0x7ce5a800 0x0 0x1)
0x91f37ca8 : 0x81362e64 (0x82308000 0x82308000 0x7ce5a800 0x2)
0x91f37d08 : 0x8135f1ac (0x82308000 0x82308000 0x0 0xbbca800)
0x91f37d48 : 0x5a1462 (0x82308000 0x8237914c 0x0 0x0)
0x91f37da8 : 0xbdae6d (0xbbbb800 0xbbcdb00 0x0 0x0)
0x91f37e48 : 0xbdb80c (0xbbbb800 0xcb173a0 0x0 0x0)
0x91f37ec8 : 0xbdb861 (0xbbbb800 0x0 0x0 0x40b5d2)
0x91f37ee8 : 0xbd4998 (0xbbbb800 0x0 0x91f37f18 0xbd4a7c)
0x91f37f18 : 0x41f963 (0xbbbb800 0x0 0x1 0x19d4b1)
0x91f37f68 : 0x41eac0 (0xbbcae80 0xf66f454 0xf66f42c 0x1369d8)
0x91f37f98 : 0x41e7a2 (0xbbc67c0 0x0 0xbd5ea00 0x0)
0x91f37fc8 : 0x19eadc (0xbbc67c0 0x0 0x1a20b5 0xf66f410)
Backtrace terminated-invalid frame pointer 0
Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies):
com.Ralink.driver.RT73(1.1.7)@0x81348000->0x8137cfff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x60c000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(1.6.0)@0xba2000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI(3.0.7)@0xbd1000->0xbe2fff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x60c000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000->0x5c3fff
BSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task
Mac OS version:
9C7010
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.2: Tue Mar 4 21:17:34 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.4.31~1/RELEASE_I386
System model name: MacPro1,1 (Mac-F4208DC8)
Wed May 28 21:08:44 2008
panic(cpu 1 caller 0x0039A8F1): "m_free: freeing an already freed mbuf"@/SourceCache/xnu/xnu-1228.4.31/bsd/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:3574
Backtrace, Format - Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
0x80f73ac8 : 0x12b0f7 (0x4581f4 0x80f73afc 0x133230 0x0)
0x80f73b18 : 0x39a8f1 (0x48fb60 0xbfaac00 0x64 0x64)
0x80f73b98 : 0xd9bd0b (0x7cf12b00 0x7cf12b00 0x0 0x1)
0x80f73ca8 : 0xd9be64 (0x81375000 0x81375000 0x7cf12b00 0x2)
0x80f73d08 : 0xd981ac (0x81375000 0x81375000 0x0 0xc00f580)
0x80f73d48 : 0x5a1462 (0x81375000 0x813e60dc 0x0 0x0)
0x80f73da8 : 0xbdae6d (0xbaa9800 0xc013c00 0x0 0x0)
0x80f73e48 : 0xbdb80c (0xbaa9800 0xc017418 0x0 0x0)
0x80f73ec8 : 0xbdb861 (0xbaa9800 0x0 0x0 0x40b5d2)
0x80f73ee8 : 0xbd4998 (0xbaa9800 0x0 0x80f73f18 0xbd4a7c)
0x80f73f18 : 0x41f963 (0xbaa9800 0x0 0x1 0x19d4b1)
0x80f73f68 : 0x41eac0 (0xbbde280 0xc394048 0x80f73f98 0x1369d8)
0x80f73f98 : 0x41e7a2 (0xbbf7880 0xbbf7880 0x80f73fc8 0x1a7e22)
0x80f73fc8 : 0x19eadc (0xbbf7880 0x0 0x1a20b5 0xbb60410)
Backtrace terminated-invalid frame pointer 0
Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies):
com.Ralink.driver.RT73(1.1.7)@0xd81000->0xdb5fff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x60c000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily(1.6.0)@0xba2000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI(3.0.7)@0xbd1000->0xbe2fff
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x60c000
dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily(3.0.8)@0x59c000->0x5c3fff
BSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task
Mac OS version:
9C7010
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.2: Tue Mar 4 21:17:34 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.4.31~1/RELEASE_I386
System model name: MacPro1,1 (Mac-F4208DC8)

Though I not very sure what is going on, I have this feeling that this has something to do with hardware (could be ram or disk). Another possibility is that some incompatible drivers (as you said) for your external hardware cause this when you connect these hardwares.
My first advice is that you repair your disk and permissions using disk utility.
Try to update all softwares and drivers for leopard. did you upgrade your OSX with leopard or clean/archive install it?
I could assure you that I have been using Mac OSX for more than one year and just had one or two kernal panic ever which is primary reason I am sticking to Mac forever.
With little experience with kernal panics, just another piece of information i could add is that Kernal panics are mostly because of illegal or corrupt memory address referencing, in short disk or memory issues.
Though I would agree Tiger is ten times more stable than leopard. I am sure things will be better with future 10.5 updates.

Suggestion to iPad developer: the screen is too bright for an E-reader

Hi,
I have been using kindle DX for reading e-book and newspapers for a year. I bought the iPad and have been using for a week. iPad has many advantages over Kindle in many ways(very fast, zoom-in zoom out, great apps for editing PDF, and many more) however, it lacks the appreciation of the display for reading. *_The brightness is quite too high(even when you try to lower the brightness setting to lowest). When I read WSJ or PDF for a while, my eyes go very very tired. It is fine in the apps like Kindle or iBook or GoodReader where you can adjust the brightness even more._* So you could read with the same light intensity like the kindle or other e-reader. However, it is still very bright in safari or WSJ apps where you cannot adjust even further. You cannot use iPad to read something in the dim light environment with this lowest brightness adjustment.
I made an appointment to the Apple store to discuss about this issue. I also compare the brightness adjustment to MacBook and other device. You can eventually dim the screen even more and more for other device except the iPad. You could also dim the brightness even more for an iPhone. The technical support told me to send a suggestion to the iPad developer so that they can do the adjustment for the next OS Update.
*My advice is to increase the range on the dimmer side of the brightness. You could also add the option to adjust for the contrast. In this case, you will have low light coming out of the device and the character is still crisp by lowering the brightness and increase the contrast of the display. The eye strain problem will be significantly reduced.*
Many of my e-reader colleagues also complain about this issues. So I hope you take this into serious consideration. Please Adjust the brightness range and everything else should be perfect. You could even think about the display like Mirasol display for the next generation of iPad as an option for display rather than only IPS LCD. This will help the e-reader oriented like me to stick with iPad forever
I strongly hope there will be some of these changes in the new OS update. Since you guys want the iPad to be one of the option of an e-reader, then the display and the brightness is very very very important.
Message was edited by: superipad
Message was edited by: superipad
Message was edited by: superipad

I adjusted everything including turning the auto brightness off( like I did for my iPhone ). And you could see that the lowest brightness of the iPhone is dimmer than the lowest level for the iPad. I have no problem reading on the iPhone without that level of brightness either. This is the only reason that I don't like about iPad and the small adjustment should satisfy all my need. I don't see any reasons for returning it.
Moreover, the eyes sensitivity to the light level or brightness for each people is different. It's correct that you and some of my friends do not have difficulty reading with this level of brightness. But some of my friends and I are having this problem in safari and the apps that do not have further brightness adjustment.
The best way for me to avoid this problem now it to alight the iPad 75-90 degree to vertical so that the light does not come directly to my eyes when I use the apps that does not contain brightness adjustment. This way reduces the light traveling to the eyes from iPad. The brightness goes down a bit more. That is why I said just reduce the lowest level to a bit more then everything is great.
I also try the inpicio anti glare to reduce the light from reflection but this does not help either because it produces bad image output and does not filter any light out.
Message was edited by: superipad
Message was edited by: superipad
Message was edited by: superipad
Message was edited by: superipad

Anyone from Blackberry Reading this Forum? If so....

Hi there, just became aware of this forum after it being mentioned over on Crackberry.com.
Anyways, if you work for Blackberry and are reading this forum and this thread, then PLEASE take stock of all that is said in this Z10 thread over on Crackberry.com here:
What Tweaks do you want to see in next BB10 software update?
And. Please. Make sure it is thoroughly shared and heard at Blackberry...
Many of us *really love* our Z10's, but can't help but feel that Blackberry/RIM *yet again* came out with an imperfect awesome device.
Is it impossible to have a nearly perfect smartphone because, although the Z10 is the best smartphone on the market according to me and others, it certainly has MUCH to be desired? Is it impossible to add (or *return*) to the Z10 most if not all of the MANY MANY MANY really great features we miss in the 7.0 system outlined in the above thread, because if it had most if not all of those features, you would be selling a lot more devices over the coming months to-be-sure?
If I were you and worked for Blackberry, I would see that Thorsten Heinz et al knew that, for the benefit of its many Z10 customers and the future of the company, Blackberry should come out with some kind of serious PR and SOON to assure us that 10.1 or other future updates will add many of the features that kept so many of us afloat in the hopes for so long that Blackberry would come out with the very best device, while we now sit here wondering why Blackberry left out SO MANY features we loved and frankly depended on with 7.0 etc, making our Z10 imperfect.
If you do not, or you tell us that we will not see many of those features, or leave us wondering much longer, then it is hard to imagine that we will stick with you forever and that Blackberry will be the flagship of smartphones it could be and succeed.
Thorsten et al, you do want to keep and grow your customer base, don't you? You do want to strike real concern and embarrassment in Apple and Android, don't you? You do want to not have future repeats of last week's sell-offs of the BBRY stock because of one tech firms' downgrade of the company's future over false rumors, but rumors still, of a high rate of returned devices, don't you? You do want to hear loudly from us that you have the most amazing phone on the planet ever, don't you?!
Then please hear and acknowledge our feedback, and execute much more of what we as Blackberry fanatics came to expect in great anticipation of what has turned out to be a three-quarter-baked awesome smartphone, the Z10, please.

OK, HTML got me again. Try this code:
case 62: // '>'
stringbuffer.append(">");
break;

The little sticks or spokes inside my iPod charger input or port are broken. and falling off. Can this be fixed without replacing my iPod I haven't backed up my iPod in forever. My iPod is also dead.

The spokes or sticks inside my iPod charger port or input or broken and falling off. Can this be fixed without replacing my iPod? I haven't backed up my iPod in forever. Can I get back all my photos and videos even though I havent backed up my iPod in FOREVER?

- Contact a data recovery company if you want the data on your iPod
- This place may be able to replace the connector without erasing the iPod.
Simple and Affordable iPod Repair Services and parts from iResQ

PO and SO IDoc Type

Hi,
I understand that the IDoc type ORDERS05 can be used for Sales Order as well as Purchase Order. My requirement is to receive Order IDoc and create the sales order and send the PO details to a partner. Please let me know whether I can use the IDoc ORDERS05 for both these cases.
Also I found that IDoc type PORDCR04 is available for PO. Can we use this IDoc type for sending Purchase order details.
Thanks
N

Hello Nanditha,
Yes you can do that.
Also go to WE60 and put in PORDCR04 and downloadd to your PC if needed.
Then search if all the fields you need are in that Idoc type.
There are no rules as to which Idoc type you have to use, but you should try your best to stick to SAP recommended one's.
Hope this helps.

SOAP to IDocs Scenario...IDocs getting locked at SAP

Dear Experts
We are sending measuring point details to SAP system from 3rd Party. Scenario is working fine for small amount of load. If more number of messages triggered (say 100) IDocs at SAP are getting stuck u201CMeasPoint 10000211 currently locked -> document processing not possibleu201D.
I tried configuring Sender SOAP adapter as EOIO and specified the Queue name as Test Queue. Still IDocs are getting stuck at SAP ECC. Now one more issues messages are getting stuck in queue SMQ2. We can control the flow by using BPM in PI. I donu2019t want to use BPM for this. Can we control this from SAP or using Trigger by background program in Partner profiles?
Please suggest. Thank You.
SAP Error Details:-MeasPoint 10000211 currently locked -> document processing not possible
Message no. IR007
Diagnosis
The object you want to access is locked, either
u2022     By yourself in another session, or
u2022     By another user
u2022     or by the system, which is still processing data for this object
System Response
The system cannot access the object.
Procedure
u2022     If you are locking the object yourself in another session, exit processing in the other session and continue processing in this session.
u2022     If the object is locked by another user, you can
o     contact the other user
o     wait until the other user has finished processing the object
u2022     If the object is locked because the system is still processing its data, wait a while, and then call up the object again.

1. Create a new process code "Z" and check the enque state of the objects before passing back to standard processing modules. Id also change to process immediate as part of this change
or
2. I think assuming RBDAPP01 is still used you may be able to make use of an exit there to do the same thing .. check and wait before processing.
or
3. In message mapping place a UDF that has some kind of wait timer in it (this is random and wont always work cause you wont know when the lock is dropped) but should work.
or
4. Dont use IDOC's create an abap proxy to do the work as a sync process. Processing will need to finish in the proxy and return to the PI stack before the next message is processed in the EOIO queue - this would be the prefered option as far as im concerned, it guarenteed to work and as long as your proxy sticks to the standard rouintes it should be upgrade friendly.
or
5. Use a proxy as above but dont do any processing, just use the proxy to build the IDOC and post it - then check the status of the locks until you are ready then rinse and repeat ..... but like scratching your right ear with your left hand .. but it will work.

BPM - IDOC System Acknowledgements from R/3

Hi My scenario is File-XI/BPM-R/3(Idocs).
In Integration process, we configured 'system ack' in Send Step which sends Idocs to R/3 system.
BPM Process stays in 'STARTED' state forever though XI received acknowledgement ( in SXMB_MONI, on the main screen ACk Status is in '?'mark meaning its still waiting for Acknowledgement. But the moment you click on the message Ack status becomes 'Ack received' and BPM ends".
This seems to be a bug.
How can the Acknowledement staus changes the moment you clike on the message?. Does anyone have same issue?. Any suggestion will be appreciated. we are on PI7.0 sps6.0 environment.
we donot want to deal with ALEUPD..so please do not suggest to config ALEUPD.

HI,
see the below
The Business Process Engine supports Acknowledgments when sending asynchronously as follows:
Acknowledgment------ Processing of Send Step
Receiver system does not support requested acknowledgments --- Send step completed successfully
Positive acknowledgment----
 Send step completed successfully
Permanent negative acknowledgment------ Send step triggers system error for which you can define a specific exception handling.
Temporary (transient) negative acknowledgment------- Send step continues to wait because the temporary acknowledgment can still change to a permanent or negative acknowledgment. This can occur in the IDoc environment in particular, for example, when a user intervenes.
Exception or error handling within the integration process is not possible. However, using message monitoring you can determine whether the acknowledgment is temporary or not.
Acknowledgment with multiple receivers A message sent from a send step can have multiple receivers. In this case, the system duplicates the message accordingly. Acknowledgments returned from the respective receivers are ignored and the send step continues to wait.
If multiple receivers are possible and you want to evaluate the individual acknowledgments, you must define the integration process accordingly. To do this, determine the receivers in a receiver determination step and send the message to the individual receivers in a loop.
For more information about acknowledgments, in particular how they are used in the adapter environment,
Note: see SAP Note 837285.
Regards
Chilla

Using PI to map IDoc BENEFIT3 to EDI 834

Has any used PI/XI to map IDoc BENEFIT3 to EDI 834? We are looking to use this approach but have had problems finding a standard map. You would think SAP would have one since they stand by their BENEFIT3 IDoc being sufficient to map to the 834. This will take forever to do it from scratch or even without an example. Help please.

Hi
You can do 1:n multimapping
in message mapping in messages tab ..add both the structures in target tab and do the mapping
and in operation mapping add both the message interface on the target side
PLease go through this blog
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Control record in File to Idoc

hi guys,
i am new to XI and now learning File to Idoc scenario.
after going thru some forums and blogs i found that while mapping the control record EDI_DC40 in the idoc should be disabled.
my question is will this control record be disabled forever or should the proper data be filled at the runtime.
help me in understanding this concept plz.
Points will be awarded
Regards
BHASKER

Hi Bhasker,
The control record acts as router. This control record has information like which is message type, Idoc type, sender port etc. [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/13/95244269625633e10000000a155106/content.htm ]
The control records need to filled since data in the Idoc has to be filled accurately. But again it is not necessary, XI has option to fill the control records by itself at runtime using receiver determination
This blog will help you understand more
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/01/xi-idoc-adapter--edidc40--demystified
regards
Ramesh P

Safari 6 (Lion) bookmark icons won't stick

I am still using Lion but I upgraded to Safari 6. If a web page has a pic next to it's URL, that pic goes with the bookmark. After upgrading, all my bookmarks have the blue ball before the each bookmark. If I click on a bookmark with a pic, it shows. However, after closing Safari and reopening, those pics are not sticking, hence back to the default blue ball showing.
What gives? A new unknown Apple setting? Glitch?
Any help with be appreciated.
Wow, I just figured it out thinking outloud to myself while studying the icons showing. Everytime history gets erased, so do the bookmark icons. Really Apple?
Any way to get them to stick besides keeping history forever?

Rats! I just noticed the same thing.
Hey, Apple: This is a bug. Erasure of the history should not erase icons associated with a site.

External screen arrangement has stopped 'sticking' after logout on one account.

I've been using an external screen with my 2006 MacBook 2.1 since forever, but recently the screen arrangement I've set up doesn't stick when I reboot or relogin. It reverts to a previous arrangement, and I have to redo the arrangement in System Preferences each time.
Is there a way round this short of a new user account?
thanks

Reply much appreciated. Although I do not claim to have much knowledge of this type of hardware and software problems but they do give me a challenge. I have been trying various things. while I was doing this, switching the pc on and off, at one point the display on LCD came back.
When I checked the status in Device manager the error message,'WINDOWS HAS STOPPED THIS DEVICE AS WINDOWS HAS REPORTED PROBLEM (CODE 43) had disappeared and it said.' The device is working properly'!
I notice that the CPU temp rises upto about 51 deg C, the fan goes crazy (fast and slow)and the temp falls down and fluctuates between 27 and 48.
The screen goes blank again and come on some time and most times not!
To me it looks like that the chipset gives up when too hot.
I intend to open up the laptop and see if the GPU chip is seated, has good contact with its heatsink etc.
If anyone has any further suggestions, will be appreciated.

Transferring inactive personnel numbers via IDOC (HRMD_A) - how?

Hello everyone,
we are using IDOCs of type HRMD_A to transfer some infotypes (0,1,2,3 and a few others) of all employee numbers from the HR system to the FI system. The transfer is initiated using transaction PFAL with transfer type "Insert". So far, so good.
Now we find that employees that have gone inactive (e.g. left the company) are not being transmitted, not even if in PFAL the time period selection is set to "ALL". As the consequence, these personnel numbers remain active in FI because their exit action is never being transmitted.
Since transaction PFAL uses object type and object id parameters for identification of the objects to be transmitted, I reckon that object-selection is OM-based. By setting object type to 'P' and leaving object ID blank, I choose to transfer all personnel numbers that are known in OM. Once an employee exits the company, however, he is effectively leaving the OM, seeing that he no longer occupies a position. I take it that this causes this personnel number no longer to be transmitted, even though in past periods she existed in the OM, and even though time period "all" was selected in the selection-screen of PFAL.
A possible factor in this may be that sometimes exits of employees are maintained in the HR system retrospectively, i.e. after they have already left the company.
How can I deal with this and make sure all personnel numbers are being transmitted including the information that they have left the company? As it is now, these personnel numbers remain "active" in the FI system forever, because PFAL on the HCM system stops transmitting them for good once they have become inactive.

1. start BD61 and active globaly change pointers
2. start sm31 and maintain V_TBDA2 for activation change pointers for HRMD_A message
3. start we20 and check you linked system for message HRMD_A
4. start bd64 and check you distibution model for HRMD_A.
if all this step is configured you can chang master data via ppome or pa30 and check via re_rhalecps generated changepointers.
than you can use bd21 for hrmd_a message for generated master hr data in outbound idoc (use we02 to see outbound idocs)

File to IDOC with some delay

Hi Experts,
My requirement is that i need to read text file line by line and post IDOC to R3 with 3 minutes delay.
That means, between two idocs that got posted ot R3, there shuld be 3 minutes delay from XI.
Is this possible, If it is possible how it si possible?
Thanks,
Subbu

Hi,
Two Mappings involved are:
1..source file to idoc imported as external definition (whose occurance is 0..unbound)
2..file(idoc imported as external definition) to IDoc
1) When you are spllitting messages with 1:N mapping in BPM, with what name you saved the multiple fies at target.
in BPM after receive step u need to add transform step where u specify ur mapping and there ur messge is getting spilt. and in File adapter for receiver give file name as temp.xml and choose option as add timestamp..so that ur file name will be "temp<timestamp>.txt" when it gets created and in sender file adapter choose option as "delete" bcoz if u don't delete it ...XI will just keep generating new multiple files
2) How could you manage picking files at 3 mintes intervals from file communciaion channel from FTP.
Now while picking file, in file adapter give file name as "temp*.xml"...here this * plays main role as it picks all files starts with temp...and again select "delete" option ..else XI again will just keep picking file forever
and in polling interval in sender file keep 3 mins delay
Hope this clears ur doubt.
Regards,
Manisha

IDOC sticks in XI - forever?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for