Idoc to cXML scenario

Hi,
I have a requirement (IDOC to cXML file), where i have to map PO IDOC to cXML file format. I understand from the cXML.org url that there are some DTD's freely available.
I guess the cXML file format is same as normal xml file with special format. please correct me if i am wrong.
can we use FILE adapter to convert the file to cXML file format. for example to abc.cxml.
can some one help me .
thanks.
azim

Hi Azias,
> Do we have to use third part adapter for this?
3rd party expression is usually used for Business Systems. Yes, you should create a 3rd party BS.
> can i use FTP adapter to create a file?
Yes
> what will be the extension of the file (i.e. abc.cxml)?
*.cxml
> Do we require secure connection in FTP adapter?
if you want to secure the connection / if you have sensible data
>
> If i want to post the cxml message to URL, then which adapter should is use? (HTTP/SOAP)?
http
Regards,
Udo

Similar Messages

Extending the IDoc to cXML scenario

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario IDoc to cXML for sending ORDERS05 .
We got a requirement to develope a scenario by extending the Order header and line extention segements to include extra fields)of the IDoc used in the above scenario , hence I am doing the following
-Imported the extended IDoc into the Integration repository.
-Mapped the extra fields included to the target message.
-reloaded the IDoc Metada using IDX2.
As i am doing this as part of the other project please suggest on the following
--Explain the sections to be included in the Technical design document for XI configuration.
--configurations that I need to work on.
please do suggest any other things i need to work on to take the right approach.
Thanks in advance.
MK

Hi,
Nothing more u require in XI development when ever u are dealing with the Extended IDOC's.
Normal procedure as Standard IDOC's only.
If u are not able to view the extended IDOC's in the Repository means then u have to think the solution.
This problem is not there for u. so go a head with the normal procedure by importing those IDOC's in IR and do mapping as usual
Regards
Seshagiri

Error/Doubts in Idoc-XI-File scenario

Dear All,
I am doing one scenario in which DELIVERY idoc is posted from R/3 to XI and then from XI that idoc is to be sent as flat file to one local folder.
For this scenario, I have done all ALE settings and I am able to see the idoc in XI in cXML format.Now I want to sent it as flat file.
Now, for doing this I created 2 BS & 2 TS. 1 BS & TS of type Third Party for receiver & 1 BS & TS are of type Web as ABAP for sender. Then I have created one namespace in IR. I have not created any DT, MT, MI, MM becoz the structure of source and target file are same. Now, I created one IM in which I specified specified Type as "ABAP Class" & Mapping program name as one of the Z function module as specified in one of the SAP Guides.
Then in ID, I created 2 Parties ie. one for Sender & one for receiver. Sender is having a communication channel of type Idoc & receiver is having communication channel of type File. And thn further Receiver Agreement, Inetrface Determination, Sender Agreement & Receiver Agreement are configured.
In my system there is one scenario already configured which is using Delivery idoc so I have used party in my scenario for both sender & receiver.
Now, when I am sending the idoc from R/3, I am able to see cXML in SXMB_MONI but it is taking receiver as the one which is defined for the already existing scenario but not the receiver defined by me.
Can anybody guide if I have followed the correct steps & where I am doing the error.
Warm Regards,
N.Jain

Hi ,
Plese refer the following blogs ,
IDoc to File
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
You have to do all this settings mentioned in the docuemnt:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/sapR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized&
Also can you check this weblogs on the same:
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi
/people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
Thanks ,
Suvarna
Award pts if it helps .

ORDERS05 IDoc to cXML SOAP - SOAP failing (Ariba call)

I am performing the following scenario:
I am sending an ORDERS05 IDoc from R/3 4.6 to XI. XI then maps the IDoc into cXML. I am then attempting to send the cXML via the SOAP adapter to Ariba via HTTP.
Everything works except the adapter fails when trying to send to Ariba. Here is the audit log:
2005-07-06 17:05:39 Success The message was successfully received by the messaging system. Profile: XI URL: http://myserver:50000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI
2005-07-06 17:05:39 Success Using connection AFW. Trying to put the message into the receive queue.
2005-07-06 17:05:39 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
2005-07-06 17:05:39 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the receive queue.
2005-07-06 17:05:39 Success The message status set to DLNG.
2005-07-06 17:05:39 Success Delivering to channel: cXML2Ariba
2005-07-06 17:05:40 Success SOAP: request message entering the adapter
2005-07-06 17:06:01 Error SOAP: error occured: java.io.IOException: failed to get the input stream from socket: java.lang.NullPointerException
2005-07-06 17:06:01 Error Exception caught by adapter framework: failed to get the input stream from socket: java.lang.NullPointerException
2005-07-06 17:06:01 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: failed to get the input stream from socket: java.lang.NullPointerException.
2005-07-06 17:06:01 Success The asynchronous message was successfully scheduled to be delivered at Wed Jul 06 17:11:01 UTC 2005.
2005-07-06 17:06:01 Success The message status set to WAIT.
Does anyone know what the error message means?
Could it possibly be that I am taking an Async IDoc, and posting a synchronous SOAP to Ariba?
Thanks!

Mary -
Hi I was wondering how you were able to determine that your XI server did not have internet connectivity and what you were able to do? We have a similar scenario only we are trying to use SSL for the connection with certificate AND getting the following error :
2005-09-08 15:46:31 Success The message was successfully received by the messaging system. Profile: XI URL: http://XIServer024:50700/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XI
2005-09-08 15:46:31 Success Using connection AFW. Trying to put the message into the receive queue.
2005-09-08 15:46:31 Success Message successfully put into the queue.
2005-09-08 15:46:31 Success The message was successfully retrieved from the receive queue.
2005-09-08 15:46:32 Success The message status set to DLNG.
2005-09-08 15:46:32 Success Delivering to channel: PCARD_Activate_File_Receiver
2005-09-08 15:46:32 Success SOAP: request message entering the adapter
2005-09-08 15:46:32 Error SOAP: error occured: java.lang.NullPointerException
2005-09-08 15:46:32 Error Exception caught by adapter framework: null
2005-09-08 15:46:32 Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: RecoverableException.

Idoc-xi-file scenario. how to display file in html format

I am not sure whether this is a valid question.........but want to confirm as it was asked by somebody
In idoc-xi-file scenario....... how to display file in html format ??
Thanks in advance
Kumar

Hi Vijayakumar,
Thanks for your reply !! You mean to say I got to use XSLT mapping and also .htm and .html extension together to produce the html file ?? or it is sufficient to use any one of them to produce the html file ??
Regards
Kumar

In idoc to file scenario, if XI system is down where do idocs pile up?

In idoc to file scenario, if XI system is down where do idocs pile up (get stuck)
what tcode can I use to reprocess it?

Sender System ,Check BD87 .. you will see alll the IDOCs in Yellow state ..
You can reprocess all the IDOCs in go from there .. if only they are in yellow state ...
regards
PS

FIle Content Conversion Problem in IDOC-XI-File Scenario

Dear All,
I am doing IDOC-XI-FILE scenario.
I am facing one problem related to File Content Coversion.My requirement was to generate a dynamic file like %store_code%_%current_date%_sitemaster.xml , I have completed the dynamic generation successfully .
Now there is slight change in the requirement ,we have to suppress the current_date node of the xml content . i have tried to suppress the current_date using these DATE.fieldFixedLengths 0 , Date.fixedLengthTooShortHandling Cut , But I am unable to suppress it Can some body provide me the details on this .
The output xml version generated by Reciever file adapter is as below :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER xmlns:ns0="http://sample-xitest.com/sitemaster">
- <SITE_DATA>
<STORE_CODE>N002</STORE_CODE>
<TITLE_MEDI>Company</TITLE_MEDI>
<STORE_NAME>Mount Road</STORE_NAME>
<STREET>Chennai</STREET>
<COUNTRY>IN</COUNTRY>
<SALES_TAX_NO>12345678910</SALES_TAX_NO>
</SITE_DATA>
</ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER>
Plz provide me the code I have to write in the file content conversion .
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prabhat

If u see my earlier reply, I mentioned that u can not suppress the field from the one node.i.e Form SITE_DATA data type u can not suppress the field called CURRENT_DATE.
My suggestion is that , modify the Data type in such a way that you will be having two nodes as I have mentioned earlier. Then use the Suppress Logic for the Current Date.
So it will look like this-
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER xmlns:ns0="http://sample-xitest.com/sitemaster">
- <SITE_DATA>
<STORE_CODE>N002</STORE_CODE>
<TITLE_MEDI>Company</TITLE_MEDI>
<STORE_NAME>Mount Road</STORE_NAME>
<STREET>Chennai</STREET>
<COUNTRY>IN</COUNTRY>
<SALES_TAX_NO>12345678910</SALES_TAX_NO>
</SITE_DATA>
<CURR_DATE>
<CURRENT_DATE>20051105</CURRENT_DATE>
</CURR_DATE>
</ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER>
So ur SITE_DATA is not having a field called CURRENT_DATE. This field is in separate node (segment ) called CURR_DATE. Now u can use the Suppress Logic for the same like this.
CURR_DATE.fieldFixedLengths - 0
CURR_DATE.fixedLengthTooShortHanling - Cut
And in your Variable Substitution you can use the date from the other segment called CURR_DATE.
Hope this solves ur problem.
Regards,
Moorthy

Pass system ack of JDBC adapter to ERP in IDoc - XI - JDBC scenario

Dear all,
i have an IDoc -> XI -> JDBC scenario (without using ccBPM). In the standard way the ERP system, sending the IDoc waits for an application acknowledgement. However the JDBC adapter is only capeable to send system acknowledgements.
Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
In help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/ab/bdb13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm) under "IDoc Processing with the IDoc Adapter " there is a table that maps XI system/applic acknowledgement to IDoc status. So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
Can anyone tell, if this is really working? What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
Many thanks and best regards
Florian

Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
Without BPM, No.
So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
The ack referred here is related to idoc status whether it is properly reached till XI or not and not related to the JDBC ack.
What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
Then u won't have any ALEAUD message at sender R3.
In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
No
Regards,
Prateek

Integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario

Hi,
Will we configure integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario or the RFC destination related to the port will be suffice?
For which logical system will the outbound partner profile configured?
Regards,
Gajendra.

Hello,
I feel that the RFC destination linked to the port is the key here.
Because the scenario (IDoc to File) works in both the cases:
Case 1: Used the logical system as Integration server
Case 2: Used the logical system related to the file (third party) in the SLD.
In both the above cases the RFC destination points to the integration server.
Is this the case that in the XI scenarios (where IDoc are sent) the logical system name in the partner profile is just dummy and has not much significance??
It is the port that matters and once the Idoc reaches XI the routing takes place based on the configuration in ID.
Thanks.
Regards,
Gajendra.

How to suppress the Acknowledgement Error in IDOC to File scenario?

Hi -
I got the status in SXMB_MONI as 'Processed Successfully' for the IDOC to File scenario but the Acknoledgement status throws an error saying 'Acknowledgement not possible'.
I read one of the documents in the forums on how to suppress the acknowledgement using a table on R/3 side using IDXNOALE,
i tried that option but i still get the 'Acknowledgement not possible' error.
Is there any other way to suppress this error?
Thanks,
Tirumal

Hi Tirumal,
Receiver adapters that run on the Adapter Engine support system acknowledgments if they are requested by the sender. Acknowledgements are triggered when a message is successfully processed by the adapter or if an error occurs while it is being processed. Receiver adapters do not support application acknowledgments. The RNIF and CIDX adapters are exceptions to this rule, since they also support scenario-dependent application acknowledgments. Sender adapters of the Adapter Engine do not request any acknowledgments.
This means, JDBC adapter does only send system acks, however IDoc adapter is requesting application acks. Therefore as mentioned by the previous poster, you have to disable acks for this scenario using report IDX_NOALE.
Also go through these documents for any further help:
http://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-how-to-guides/how to handle acknowledgments for idoc.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
abhy

IDOC to JDBC scenario in case of Cost Element Group IDOC.

This is an IDOC to JDBC scenario.
The Cost Element Group IDOC is having different segments. The main segment E1COGH (1...unbound) is consisting of different subsegment like E1OGS (0...unbound) & E1COGV (0...unbound). The main segment (E1COGH) along with subsegments E1OGS & E1COGV) is occuring more that 1 times. I have to insert data into the table, which we can do in single rows (no hierarchy is possible in tables). I have used "use one as many" in message mapping. Now if E1OGS or E1COGV is repeating in a single E1COGH segment then we dont get any error. But if I duplicate the main segment then I am getting runtime exception.
Please suggest about how to map in this case.

In my scenario:
     E1COGH
     |
      -> E1COGS
         E1COGV
where     E1CGH -> Main segment
     E1COGS & E1COGV -> sub segment
E1COGH -> 1..unbound
E1COGS -> 1..unbound
E1COGV -> 1..unbound
At the target side I have created two Statement Structure (ie.Statement & Statement_1) . One for E1COGS (ie. Statement) & the other for E1COGV (ie. Statement_1).
Case 1 -> If E1COGS is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGS is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement & in the absence of E1COGS this Statement structure is SUPPRESSED.
Similarly,
Case 1 -> If E1COGV is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGV is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement_1 & in the absence of E1COGV this Statement_1 structure is SUPPRESSED.
All the elements of the segment E1COGH, E1COGHT & E1COGHR are replicated in all the rows for X (no. of occurance of E1COGS) + Y (no. of occurance of E1COGV).
While testing in Message Mapping, I am able to get the output as for multiple occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV in a single E1COGH.
But if I increse the occurence of E1COGH the it is giving the following error :
Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_Cost_Element_Group_Response/Statement/DBtablename/access/GROUPNAME. The message is: Exception:[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.IllegalInstanceException: Too few values in first queue in function useOneAsMany. It must have the same number of contexts as second queue.] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.NodeFunctions method useOneAsMany[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.CollapseContexts@51197231, , ]
Please suggest how to map the occurence of E1COGH simultaneously with the occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV.

RFC Destination not getting connected - IDoc to XI scenario

Hi Everybody,
I want send an IDoc from R/3 System to Xi, I have created Two logical systems (Sender and Receiver correspondingly) and i have assigned the clients to them.
Once i create RFC destination, i have specified all my technical settings as well as Login/Security settings, once i click, "Remote Log On" it takes me directly to Login page of XI. Please guide me how to solve the problem. If i click Test---> Authorization, it prompts out with an error "Name and Password is incorrect (repeat Logon)", but i have given exact username and password.
I am a fresher to XI.... please give me some documents related to IDoc to XI scenario step by step to [email protected] I would be grateful and appreciate you if u would help me to sort out this problem....
Please give me step by step solutions.... Thanks in Advance...
Regards/Guru

Requirements in R3 system:
1. Create RFC destination pointing to XI in SM59
2. Create port for XI using we21
3. create Outbound Entry in partner Profile for XI in we20.
Requirements in XI system:
1. Create Technical System pointing to the R3 system.
2. create Business System pointing to the R3 system.
If you want to send IIDOC out of XI,
1. SM59 - Create RFC destination
2. IDX1 - Create port
3. IDX2 - Import Metadata.
Note:u dont need a IDOC sender adapter or a Sender Agreement to sent a IDOC to XI.
Check dis link for more info:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cdded790-0201-0010-6db8-beb9bb2b2660
please refer to michel book on IDCO usage in XI
Message was edited by:
Sreeram Reddy

IDOC to file scenario

Hi Experts,
In IDOC to file scenario i did in this way.
1)created logical system.
2)Using SALE tcode I assign logical system to client ,created RFC destination,Port and Partner's profile.
It is showing all the thing correct.
3) In XI system , I configured using IDX1 and IDX2.
Then I created the material and checked the status which is green in we05.
But in tcode IDX5, the material is not coming.
Here I am confused that why data is not coming to XI system.
can anyone help me?
Thanks
Rabi

Hi,
The Following are the Possible checks
1) Check in R/3 side SMQ1 & SMQ2
2) Check in R/3 side SM58
   In R/3 system, Goto SM58 tcode and see if the IDOC have stuck up in Queue.
   If the entry is available then select it and press F6, to push it manually.
    This happens normally if IDOC stuck up in queues.
3) Check in PI SMQ2 and IDX5
regards,
ganesh.

PI 7.1 scenario -- File to File , File to IDOC and IDoc to File Scenario

Hi All,
*I have PI 7.0 . I have in that File to File , File to IDOC and IDoc to File Scenarios*
File to File -- This scenario is working fine.
File to IDOC -- Setting done in PI 7.0 like SM59, IDXI, IDX2 and in R/3 like SALE (logical system)--- This scenario is working fine.
IDoc to File -- Seeting done in R/3 like SALE (Logical system, Distrubtion Model (Port, Partner Profile)) -- This scenario is working fine.
Now I need to move to PI 7.1 -- for File to File , File to IDOC and IDoc to File Scenarios.
Please let me know do I require to make any changes in Design and Configuration and settings in PI 7.1 and R/3 for above scenarios or it will work fine as it is already working for PI 7.0
If changes are required please let me know what changes to do for each scaenario and pls also send blogs for that.
Regards

>
Rickkk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Idoc metadeta is updated through idx2?
>
> Regards
If there is no metadata maintained for an idoc type, the metadata for that idoc type gets loaded when an idoc of that type is received by PI for the first time. If you are looking at loading metadata of all idoc types before the first run, its really not required. Just make sure that the port is configured properly. Although, there is no harm in preloading the metadata using IDX2.
You need to use IDX2 mandatorily when the the metadata changes and the metadata in ECC and PI is different. In that case, you need to delete metadata for the changed IDoc type and then either you can update the metada through IDX2 or let the system take care of.

Mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario

mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
source structure
E1KNB1M
BUKRS = 1000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 9000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 2000
THE NODE E1KNB1M is repeated many times and the field BUKRS is also repeated with E1KNB1M as above
TARGET field : ISFRANCHISE
if any where value of BUKRS =9000 we have to pass Y to the target filed, else N
if BUKRS = 9000   THEN ISFRANCHISE= Y
               ELSE
            ISFRANCHISE=N
I've done the mapping as below
BUKRS = 9000--> IF THEN Y ELSE N--
> ISFRANCHISE
BUT everry time the target value is N only
pl suggest
rgds
mojib

mapped like this
BUKRS--->SORT---->
                                             EQUALS --------IF---THEN    Y
9000------------------------>                                               ----------------->ISFRANCHISE
                                                              ELSE   N
context of BUKRS set to parent node
its worked
thanks to all for valuable suggestions
rgds
mojib

Idoc to cXML scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for