IDOC to FTP File - Error : SAP:Stack No receiver agreement found for send

Hello Friends,
I need to configure a senario Idoc to FTP File, Í did required settings in R3 and in PI... , did mapping and configuratino in PI... and when I send my idoc I got error msg in monitor
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender ,BMG_ASN_File_Component to receiver ,GTN_224,http://adis-bmg.de/asn,SI_BMG_ASN</SAP:Stack>
I search the fourm but did not got my answer, me just a bit confused...
In my senario I have having followings:
1. Bussiness System ( RFT : sender R3 system). ( I have define a party and make a connection under Idoc Partner )
2. Bussiness Component ( ZTEST_COMP as on Reciever side is File Server, so I define the reciver as bussiness component )
3. Communicatin Channel
    File with protocol FTP having communicatin component as my Bussiness Component ( reciver ). there I defied the required info for FTP
4. Reciever Determination
    Sender:
    - RFT
    - Idoc-Interface
    - urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
   Reciever
    communication party = space
    communicatin component = ZTEST_COMP
    Configure Reciever:
   There I again define the communication component as ( ZTEST_COMP)
5. Interface Determination
    -RFT
    - Idoc-Interface
    - urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
   Reviever:
    ZTEST_COMP
and define the mapping which I did in design ( although I have seen some threads where mentioned we dont need maaping in this case ) ?
6. Reciver agrement
sender:
- RFT
Reviver:
- ZTEST_COMP
- SI interface ( SI_BMG_ASN )
- http://test-etc.de/asn
and included my CC for file .....
Now when I send Idoc I got error msg that Reciver is not found : am I dong something wrong ? do I have to defien a bussiness system instead of Bussiness Component ?
Pls suggest...

( I have define a party and make a connection under Idoc Partner
Do you really need a party in your communication? Should it not be a partly-less communication.
In the receiver agreement ensure that you have included the inbound message interface.
communication party = space
No need to give any space.
In the Interface Determination i hope that you have included the receiver meessage interface and then the corresponding Interface Mapping.
If still not works then make some dummy changes and again activate....correspondingly check the cache status of the ID-objects
Regards,
Abhishek.

Similar Messages

Error in BPM (No receiver agreement found from sender to bpm)

Hi all
In a simple bpm scenario, I am getting a error that No receiver agreement found for sender service to bpm integration process.
What might be the reason?

your configuration should like this.
say u are doing File to File using BPM
File to BPM
then BPM to File.
so u need to create RD where sender is fileservice and receiver is BPM.
second u hav to create another RD where BPM is sender and Fileserviceis receiver.
So there should be
one Sender Ag
two RD
two ID
one RA.
Thanks
Farooq.

No receiver agreement found Error in SXMB_MONI

Hello all,
I am working sample file to file scenario. after compliteion of my scenario i tested through component monitoring. i got following error in sxmb_moni, No receiver agreement found for sender, But i defined receiver agreement and communication channel, can any body suggest me how can i resolve this problem,
Thanks&Regards,
VenkatK

Dear Venkat,
Once check whether you have defined the correct reciver aggrement. If it is fine, Then delete the receiver aggrement and configure new one and activate it. And test the sceanrio once. I think this may solve ur problem. If the problem exists again, then follow the below steps.
In SAP system, Goto SICF tcode.
1.There you just click execute button or F8.
2.Then expand "Default Host" .(This will be in below the Virtuelle hosts/services)
3.Then expand SAP.
4.Then expand XI.In that just activate all the service elements.Just right click and select activate service.
After this, execute your sceanrio. This will solve your problem.
If Helpful reward points.

SAP PI Party setup IDoc - HTTP: no receiver agreement found

Hi,
We have setup SAP IDoc -> SAP PI --> HTTP with 2 parties, as described in the the 'HOW..TO Sample IDoc - XI scenario's' case 7:
For the clarity of the example, the sender at our side is 'AAA', and the receiver side is 'BBB'.
1. Sender Party
Agency -
Scheme -
Name
http://sap/com/xi/XI -
XIParty -
PA_AAA
BS_BBB    -
ALE#LI -
0000100581
2. Receiver Party
Agency -
Scheme -
Name
http://sap/com/xi/XI -
XIParty -
PA_BBB
AD2_200 (SAP system) -
ALE#KU -
DE217560
The other components in XI are as follows:
3. Business component: PA_BBB | BS_BBB (party and Business System)
4. Receiver determination: sender AD2_200, receiver party: PA_BBB, receiver component: BS_BBB
5. Receiver agreement: sender AD2_200, receiver party: PA_BBB, receiver component: BS_BBB
    Header mapping: sender comm party: PA_AAA, receiver comm party: PA_BBB
6. Communication channel (HTTP): CC_HTTP_RCV_BBB
    Identifiers: sender agency: BS_BBB ALE#LI, receiver agency: BS_BBB ALE#KU
When we send an IDoc with SNDPRN=AD2_200, RCVPRN=DE217560, RCVPRT=KU, SAPXI doesn't seem to find receiver determination, iinterface determination and receiver agreement
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start with given receiver PA_BBB -</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Using Receiver Determination 00000000000000000000000000000000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers.</Trace>
<SAP:AdditionalText>No receiver agreement found for , AD2_200, PA_BBB, , urn:sap- com:document:sap:idoc:messages,
Can someone explain why these parties have to be indicated in all these different places (the party descriptions, the receiver agreement, the communication channel), and why the receive determination with receiver party PA_BBB is not found, although it is created and refreshed in the cache ?
Regards,
Jan Macken

I am also facing same issue when using 2 parties. Could you please let me know if you got solution for this?

Error in AEX Itegrated Configuration Testing "No receiver agreement found."

Hi,
          I am working on PI 7.3, doing a File to Idoc by using the AEX(Advance Adapter Engine Extended). While doing the configuration testing i am getting the below error "
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -BC_XXXXXXX to receiver -BS_XX5_100,urn:XXXX.com:POC:MasterData:Article:ECC:Sender.SI_OA_POC: No receiver agreement found for , BC_xxxxx, , BS_xx5_100, urn:xxxx.com:POC:MasterData:Article:ECC:Sender, SI_OA_POC."
        I gone through the SDN but not got usefull links. I tryied to recreating whole scenario, Cache refresh, but no luck. Can you pls let me know where is the problem. Do i need to do any additional configuration other than creating RFC in Java stack for AEX?
Thanks & Regards,
Dev

Hi RK,
        Thanks for your reply.
              Yes i have created the Idoc_AAE channel and assigned this channel in my Outbound Processing tab.
What do you mean by java channel in Inbound Processing? My sender is File so i created File channel and assigned in the Inbound processing tab.
@ Raghu,
            I have created the Receiver channel. I no need to create Receiver agreement because i am using the ICO so if i give the Receiver and Inbound interface details that is enough. And one more thing i am doing testing in ID Test confiuration.
Thanks ,
Dev

ERROR in PI : No sender agreement found for , , , , ,

Hello everybody,
i'm working with SAP PI 7.1
it's a new installation.
I created the first easy interface JDBC-Pi-File.
when i activate the CC i don't see any message in SXMB_MONI but in RWM i see the messages in Waiting status and when i look inside i see the follow error:
SOAPFAULT received from Integration Server. ErrorCode/Category: XIServer/INBOUND_BINDING_ERROR; Params: BS_CSIS_DEV, http://xxxx.com/test, SI_DB2SP_DOCUMENTS_AA_02; AdditionalText: null; ApplicationFaultMessage: null; ErrorStack: Error in sender agreement for party , service BS_CSIS_DEV, interface namespace http://xxx.com/test interface SI_DB2SP_DOCUMENTS_AA_02 No sender agreement found for , , , , ,
1-Configuration is ok. I create all steps and sender Agreement exist
2-end point http://yyyyy:50100/sap/xi/engine?type=entry is correct and the same in SLD and sxmb_adm -> Integration Engine Configuration
3-i suppose 50100 port is correct because when i try to use 8010 port i have a different error.
4- i alreadi used CPA cache refresh and SXI_CACHE.
Any suggestion?
thanks

after 20 minuts i retry.
Now the error message is changed:
Transmitting the message to endpoint http://yyyyyy:8010/sap/xi/engine?type=entry using connection JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Error transmitting the message over HTTP. Reason: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused.
Edited by: apederiva on Aug 25, 2010 11:35 AM

Error message - "Overlapping validity areas were found for country BR"

Hi Experts,
For a certain output type Y953 (e.g. for the shipment 2002355665 related to the DN 3087912658), an error message "Overlapping validity areas were found for country BR" is coming in as error.
The error message is appearing during the idoc processing of the shipment.
This is an incident of Dangerous Goods.
I would like to know if it is technically / functionally possible to find out as to why exactly this mesage is coming and how can we rectify the problem.
From technical point of view we checked that this message was not being called in the SAP system but was dynamically called.
kindly let me know of any breakthrough as this issue is critical as dangerous goods are being transported without needed documents printed.
Thanks in advance.
RIttik

Check whether note 836139 helps you.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

XML Form Error: java.lang.RuntimeException: No system found for alias

Hello,
We are currently having an issue with our XML forms. When we try to access our XML forms we receive the following error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No system found for alias SAP_R3_QWA
Is there a place within the forms to set the system alias?

Hi Jereme,
Have you installed the DMS Connector for KM?
I can imagine that this issue is related to an incorrect version of the DMS Connector for KM (regardless of whether you are using the DSMRM or not).
In that case you can do the following to correct the issue:
1) Undeploy your current version of 'DMS Connector for KM'
2) Download the latest version of 'DMS Connector for KM' from Service Marketplace and deploy it to your portal
3) Restart J2EE engine after deployment
Hope this helps,
Robert

IDoc to Flat File in SAP PI 7.11

Hi Experts,
I am working on PI 7.11 and I have scenario from Idoc to Flat File.
Idoc is posted from source side R/3 system.My requirement is "With out Converting the Idoc structure to XML Structure i want to send the data to Target system i.e. File system.
But the structure of the target structure is different from source structure.
My questions are:
1). Is it Possible to send the data to Target system without converting Idoc structure in to xml format through our PI 7.11 ?
2). If possible please provide me the way that executes in the Interface is?
Could you please provide the Inputs.
Best regards,
satya.T
Edited by: satyatanuku on May 24, 2010 3:26 PM
<Moved from Trial, Preview~ forum>
Edited by: Prateek Raj Srivastava on May 25, 2010 1:02 PM

Hello Folks ,
I am also facing the same scenario please provide me any options to achieve this scenario .
I am searched in Forums of SDN but no inputs or blogs available.
Let me know i am having one solution is it right or wrong ?
we have to achieve this IDOC Tunneling .... is it right friends ?
Still inputs required....
Regards,
Ravi.

No Receiver Agreement found - IDOC RCVPRN = Party

Hello,
I have created all the receiver agreements required and they are in the configuration scenario.
I have a receiver determination that is using the IDOC vendor number (RCVPRN) to determine the party for delivering purchase orders and another RD with the same config for delivering po changes.
In tests my POs are sending successfully and my PO Changes are failing even though they use the same party setup/config. In SXMB_MONI I can see that the receiver determination for the POs are creating the correct party:
PO Results:
<SAP:Party agency="http://sap.com/xi/XI" scheme="XIParty">Ventura</SAP:Party>
But the PO Changes seem unable to connect the vendor number to the party:
PO Change Results:
<SAP:Party agency="http://sap.com/xi/XI" scheme="XIParty">0000557129</SAP:Party>
In the sample above the party Ventura is set up under the party identifiers as follows:
Agency:
http://sap.com/xi/XI
http://stc.com/pi/SAPR3
Scheme:
XIParty
Vendor
Name:
Ventura
0000557129
How is it that PI 7.10 is getting the same value in RCVPRN and assigning the Party correctly in one case and incorrectly in another?
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Matt

Sometimes you just need to walk a way for a day or two... I rechecked the standard configurations over and over. But I didn't review the Party Extended selection. In the Receiver Determination I chose to use RCVPRN to identify the Party but upon further investigation I realized I was using the wrong scheme and agency on the Party extension.
So my party had the following:
Agency:
http://sap.com/xi/XI
http://stc.com/pi/SAPR3
Scheme:
XIParty
Vendor
Name:
Ventura
0000557129
My Receiver Determination was not using http://stc.com/pi/SAPR3 Vendor 0000557129 to determine the Party it was attempting to use http://sap.com/xi/SI XIParty Ventura. So it was unable to find a matchinig party using the Vendor Numbers.
Thanks for all the help.
Matt

Getting error EXP-00003: no storage definition found for segment(0, 0)

I am getting an error when using "Export: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production" on "AIX 6.1.0.0" and connecting to a remote database with version "Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production". I have tried many different options but the latest command that I ran is:
exp Userid=id/password@db TABLES=myschema.mytable file=mytable.dat log=mytable.log compress=y INDEXES=N
I am not using expdp for some specific reasons but this Export works on smaller tables whereas this has > 100,000 records. Also there is ample space on the landing directory.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you!

This is the bug. Read this
OERR: EXP 3 "no storage definition found for segment(%lu, %lu)" [ID 21599.1]
It also happens When trying to export an object, all associated objects are exported as well. If one of the indexes is owned by a user and the exporting user does not have permissions on that index object the export fails.
Edited by: TSharma on Feb 7, 2013 11:47 AM

LIBOVD ERROR - "validateContextToken: workflow session was not found for given context. Create a new workflow session with token"

Hello everyone,
I have the following scenario:
We're using "Oracle SOA Suite 11g 11.1.1.7.0" (Patched w/ 17893896) mainly for a BPM/Human workflow composite. Former, we were having the error bellow:
<Mar 16, 2015 1:13:03 PM BRT> <Error> <oracle.soa.services.workflow.query> <BEA-000000> <<.> Verification Service cannot resolve user identity. User weblogic cannot be found in the identity repository. Workflow Context token cannot be null in request.
ORABPEL-30511
When that error ocurred, no one was able to use the system (BPM/Human Workflow).
I opened an SR, and after some analysis from the support, it recommended me to set up "virtualize=true" in EM, and restarting the domain. Then it started logging the following:
connection to ldap://[10.200.10.57]:7001 as cn=Admin.
javax.naming.NamingException: No LDAP connection available to process request for DN: cn=Admin.
Looking up on support KB, I found this note Doc ID 1545680.1 and increased from Max size of Connection Pool 10 to 200. That did work successfully! Problem now is that the <SERVER>_diagnostic.log is being filled up with the following error:
[2015-03-31T16:03:46.421-03:00] [soa_server2] [ERROR] [] [oracle.soa.services.workflow.verification] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: e0194e38aa6c9a2f:39fc1ff9:14c5def5247:-8000-00000000000a5653,0] [APP: soa-infra] <.> validateContextToken: workflow session was not found for given context. Create a new workflow session with token=51490173-e3d0-41dd-ae99-983915aa8454;;G;;Z+P7Oe9ABnoTUQD9ECryEW2l0/8yRcqPDyZsOWBCuzMmRgA3Qsj601TxmWQ87z2MjuwW5AH+KzgjIwkPmhJFdpc1FrE6Y/MrN1bxIDHJWu2/zP3iSNwKD07hRrh/U37Ea0TvaQyuaHJIog9y3Ptmzw==
One important point is that we're using only the embedded WLS ldap. So I am not 100% sure if we should be using the virtualize flag=true, once all docs I read point out that this should be done when using multi-ldap providers.
Also, I only got this error in the "diagnostic.log".
Although, no user has complained about using the system, I really want to work it out. Anyone has any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!

I have moved your thread from Certification to SOA Suite to get proper assistance.
Thanks,
Lisa

Error: No standard agreement found for....

Hello,
I've been fighting during hours with this error. I'm using PI 7.1 ehp 1 in a SOAP to RFC scenario and I can't find why this is happening.
In the scenario everything it's ok. If I go to the receiver determination I can see the interface determination, receiver agreement and receiver communication channel but when I test the scenario PI isn't capable to determine the receiver interface (the system determines that the receiver interface is the sender interface)... It doesn't matter if I use a SOAP client or I use the RWB tool to test it directly to the IE.
I've refreshed all the caches, and I created allt the scenario again but the problem is still there...
Can it be a problem with this last PI version?

Thank you Rajesh,
I've tested the configuration in ID and it's much more clear there. The problem is that the system didn't found any interface determination... and then it uses the sender interface as receiver interface... But it has no sense because if I go to the receiver determination object I can see how PI detects the interface determination for that receiver...
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service "RECEIVER" </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) "RECEIVER" "OUT INTERFACE" </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: "IN INTERFACE" </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>

Receiving Error : Please set the Receivables system options for this operating unit and ensure that the MO: Operating Unit profile option is correctly set with an operating unit that is set up in Receivables. while trying to create a new Customer.

Hi All,
We have set up a new Operating Unit in Oracle Apps. Now when I am trying to create a new Customer in that Operating Unit, I am receiving following error:
ERROR MESSAGE:-Please set the Receivables system options for this operating unit and ensure that the MO: Operating Unit profile option is correctly set with an operating unit that is set up in Receivables.
We do have MO: Operating Unit and MO: Default Operating Unit set properly at Responsibility level for the Responsibility through which I am accessing this form.
Your help is appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
SKA

You can refer this thread and check your MO operating unit is set or not https://community.oracle.com/message/3937028 thanks

Error. in WS Navigator - no endpoints found for interface

Dear Friends,
I have created a new Enterprise Service Interface and implemented in ABAP. After the implementation I used SOAMANAGER to create the endpoint and publish the service using WSPUBLISH to Service Registry. When I tested this service from SOA Management application(SOAMANAGER), the endpoint is working very good, but when I am testing this service from Service Registry, it is now showing any endpoint in the 'Enter Input Parameters' Step. Also when I am trying to search the Service by using 'Search by Logical Destination', it shows the Service and when I select it, it shows an error message, "no endpoints found for interface (<namespace>/document)<Service Interface Name>_Document".
If some one knows about this issue, please advice me to do next steps.
Also I am planning to call this service from Visual Composer, I have configured the two logical destinations over there, also the service registry, even though, when i am searching the service, it shows an error like "Could not complete search".
Please advice me for the above issue also.
Thanks in advance
Vipindas

Hi,
If you have configured and tested from SOAMANAGER (which opens WSnavigator) then it is configured correctly. May be you are using wrong WSDL address.
Copy url of wsdl from SOAMANGER test screen and use it directly in WSnavigator for testing.
Regarding publishing of service WSPUBLISH should be able to publish correct service into service registry, but if for any reason it is not working then you can "publish" it directly from service registry by using publish option and provide url of wsdl from above option.
If for any reason VC is unable to search service registry then create destination template for your every service by providing WSDL and use it in VC.
Regards,
Gourav

IDOC to FTP File - Error : SAP:Stack No receiver agreement found for send

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for