IDoc to IDOC, Message Mapping settings

Hi!
I am going to implement IDoc to IDOC scenario.
The IDOC should be send from SAP ECC 6.0 system, client 100 to the same system in client 200 via SAP XI.
I have chosen the message type MATMAS05.
Questions
- What is the minimal message scenario (MATMAS:MATMAS05 to MATMAS.MATMAS05) in message mapping?
- when I change some mapping attributes do I need to activate the other related objects (e.g. Interface Mapping, etc.)?
My problem is that the IDOC will be received in SAP XI, but has the following error:
Error: must node 'E1MARAM' failed in structue MATMAS05
How can i correct this error?
Thank you very much!
regards
Holger

Hi Holger,
> * What is the minimal message scenario (MATMAS:MATMAS05 to MATMAS.MATMAS05) in message >mapping?
No Mapping at all or a direct 1:1 connection of all corresponding fields.
> * when I change some mapping attributes do I need to activate the other related objects (e.g. Interface >Mapping, etc.)?
You only have to activate objects that you changed - so no.
From the error I guess that a node in the target structure is not created although the idoc-definition states it as mandatory.
Do you really need the mapping? Does the incoming IDoc also miss the Node?

Similar Messages

Need Help with Message Mapping in PI 7.1 - JDBC to IDOC

I have an outgoing SQL function that sends multiple rows of data for use in creating an IDOC in ECC. I am trying to key the creation of new IDOCs (already did the maxOccurs trick to the IDOC definition) based on a field in the JDBC return data...
JDBC Message Format...
SEGNAM - TRANS_ID - MATERIAL - VKORG...ETC
MARA - 00001 - 1234 - <space> - ...
MARC - 00001 - 1234 - VK01 - ...
MARA - 00002 - 9876 - <space> - ...
MAKT - 00002 - 9876 - <space> - material description - ...
Each time there is a new TRANS_ID, I need to indicate a new IDOC in the message mapping. I have tried all kinds of combinations of TRANS_ID --> dropContext --> splitValue and TRANS_ID --> collapseContext --> splitValue, but nothing has worked.
Has anyone done this kind of message map (without any BPM please)?
Thanks,
Nathan

Hello Nathan,
For this one, you have to play with contexts.
row 1 SEGNAM = MARA, TRANS_ID = 1, MATNR = 123...
row 2 SEGNAM = MARC, TRANS_ID = 1, MATNR = 123, WERKS = PL01...
row 3 SEGNAM = MARA, TRANS_ID = 2, MATNR = 987
This also depends on the occurrence of the parent node. example, if I want MATNR to be populated, the logic would be like
ex:
IDOC1..unbounded) (The logic is the already provided in an earlier response)
-->MATNR (1..1)
MATNR --------> removeContext ----------------> FormatByExample --> MATNR
TRANS_ID --> removeContext --> splitByValue:ValueChange --> /
If the rows are not in order of trans_id, then you need to incorporate sorting into the logic above.
Hope this helps,
Mark

IDOC in Message mapping

Hi folks,
I am working on file to idoc scenario. I Imported the IDOC to my scenario. In Messaga Mapping IDOC structure displaying fields as a documention. but i need techincal names of those fields.
for Example: In my IDOC 1 field is showing companycode but I want to see that field as a BUKRS.
How to see the technical names of IDOC fields in Message Mapping.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anitha.

Hi bavesh...
thank you so much for very your quick responses..
i got xsd as source..based on xsd i created external definition for source xsd and i created outbound interface based on source external deifinition MI_OUT_WearUnits.
and i imported Idoc and exported as xsd and changed occurance to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
i did mapping between these two external definitions.
and i selected standard idoc for source and target interface for interface mapping and given message mapping of previous step.
In ID
sender agreement :
 sender service :BS_external
 sender interface :MI_OUT_WearUnits
receiver agreement:
 receiver service :R/3
 receiver interface : standard Idoc
Interface determination:
sender service :BS_external
sender interface :MI_OUT_WearUnits
reciever service :R/3
and clicked create
inbound interface : Standard IDOc
i am not getting Interface mapping which i created in IR.
i tried Enhance interface determination also..
please guide me....
waiting for your help.
regards
ram

Need help on message mapping screen

Hi folks,
I am working on file to idoc scenario. I Imported the IDOC to my scenario. In Messaga Mapping IDOC structure displaying fields as a documention. but i need techincal names of those fields.
for Example: In my IDOC 1 field is showing companycode but I want to see that field as a BUKRS.
How to see the technical names of IDOC fields in Message Mapping.
Your help is highly apprecia

Hi,
I dont think we would be able to see the data element names of the IDOC in XI. Even the imported XSD of Idoc doesnot contain data element name.
We would be only dealing with the field names/ structure of the IDOC for field message mappings. The field names are internally mapped to the data element names in SAP R3 system.
To view the internal mapping between field names and data element names of the Idoc fields, you can go to the transaction 'WE30'. Give the basic type of the Idoc and go to the segment editor. You can find the data element names for each field name there.
Thank you.
Regards,
Subbu

Issue with IDOC occurence and SeeBurger message mapping

Hey Guys
While developing a EDI 850 to IDOC scenario i came across this issue with pre-delivered Seeburger mapping(A_850_V4010_to_I_ORDERS05).
I actually need to post multiple IDOC's to SAP system in the same message so i changed the IDOC occurence to unbounded and re-imported that as a .XSD file in Integration repository.
Earlier the pre-delivered message mappings provided by SeeBurger(under SEEBURGER_HIGH-TECH, 1.7.1 of seeburger) was working fine for me since i was posting only 1 IDOC but now the mapping is failing as the IDOC occurence has changed(unbounded).
Is there a way we can do some settings on SeeBurger server or Bic so that we can use the pre-delivered mapping for Multiple IDOC's as well?
I just want to make sure before i start off with doing whole of the mapping manually.
Thanx
Aamir

Thanx for the input guys
@Deepthi.
Doing whole of mapping manualy is definitely the last option but i m looking for ways to re-use the pre-delivered SeeBurger mapping.
>>Seeburger Mapping is only just to convert XML to EDI and EDI to XML.
Bic mapping designer does this,i m dealing with message mapping of XI(convert source to target) not Bic designer right now,and Bic does more than just XML to EDI and vice versa,it handles other industry standards too.
@Jens
>>The XI message mappings from Seeburger in the Industry solutions are mapping templates
Yeah,but the mapping template i have deals with 850 to ORDERS05,when i change IDOC occurence and re-import it back in Integration repository,it doesn't stays as ORDERS05,it has to be changed to user defined message interface(in my case MI_ORDERS05) so i m unable to use 850 to ORDERS05 template.
@Seshagiri
>>Open the Seeburger SWCV From the IR--goto External Def---Select the right one and copy it and paste it in notepad.
Changing the occurence is not an issue,i want to re-use the pre-delivered mapping in Integration repository,which is not working.
Looks like i need to do it manually
Thanx
Aamir

PI 7.11: IDoc Message mapping

Hi there,
I'm currently working on a graphical message mapping using IDoc HRMD_A06 as source structure (HR master data transferred via PFAL).
In my result structure I have to fill a field CostCenter with the following logic:
If field KOSTL (cost center) is filled in node E1P0315, map this field to CostCenter in result structure, otherwise take KOSTL of node E1P0001.
The end date (ENDDA) has to be '99991231' in each case.
This is how the result structure looks like:
<e> [1...1]
<CostCenter> [1...1]
</e>
This is the simplified source structure:
<E1PLOGI SEGMENT="1">
<E1PITYP SEGMENT="1"> [0...n]
 <E1P0001 SEGMENT="1"> [0...n]
 <INFTY>0001</INFTY> [0...1]
 <ENDDA>99991231</ENDDA> [0...1]
 <KOSTL>0000012345</KOSTL> [0...1]
 </E1P0001>
</E1PITYP>
<E1PITYP SEGMENT="1"> [0...n]
 <E1P0315 SEGMENT="1"> [0...n]
 <INFTY>0315</INFTY> [0...1]
 <ENDDA>99991231</ENDDA> [0...1]
 <KOSTL>0000024001</KOSTL> [0...1]
 </E1P0315>
</E1PITYP>
</E1PLOGI>
How can I do the check if field KOSTL of node E1P0315 is null?
I've tried an existence check for the whole node (E1P0315->exists), but then it fails, because all E1PITYP nodes are processed.
I hope my problem is clear to you.
Would it be better to use another mapping type?
As I'm an ABAP developer, I would of course prefer some lines of code to this graphical drag&drop thing.
Thanks in advance!

Cheers, guys!
I did it now like that:
http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=mappingflknz.jpg
Click on the image to enlarge it!
The logic is as following (ABAP Pseudo-code ):
IF 0315_KOSTL and 0315_ENDDA are populated.
IF 0315_ENDDA equals '99991231'.
 map 0315_KOSTL to Cost_Center.
ENDIF.
ELSE.
IF 0001_KOSTL and 0001_ENDDA are populated.
 IF 0001_ENDDA equals '99991231'.
 map 0001_KOSTL to Cost_Center.
 ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
Is that a good way to do that mapping?
Do I also have to use the removeContexts function or is it ok like that?
Could I also do that with an ABAP mapping program?
Thanks in advance!

Doubt in fields - message mapping (file 2 idoc scenario)

while doing message mapping in file 2 idoc scenario, i could not able find the values for some field names
( i am following this wiki help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC& )
cremas04 idoc
vendorNo LIFNR
vendor name Name1
Pur_org ? ( I could not able locate field with the similar desc in idoc MT side)
Company code ?
Acc_Grp ?
Search term MCOD1
Address ADRNR
City ORT01
Pin_code PSLTZ
could you help me out with this?
Message was edited by: praba
praba

hi,
I got the answer.

In Idoc bundling ...message mapping not found

Hi XI Friends..
In my File to Idoc scenario..i want to send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM .
I am following blog by Michal.
<a href="///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change:///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
I have xsd for source ..so i created one external definition .and message interface for outbound.
following the above blog by michal..
i imported idoc ..and i exported that idoc into xsd and i changed the occurance of idoc to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
i created the message mapping between these two external definitions.and tested ..
As in michal 's blog..
In Interface mapping..i given source and target interface as standard idoc.and clicked on Read interface then i am not finding the message mapping created in previous step..
i refreshed cache also..
please guide me.....
regards
ram

Hi bavesh...
thank you so much for very your quick responses..
i got xsd as source..based on xsd i created external definition for source xsd and i created outbound interface based on source external deifinition MI_OUT_WearUnits.
and i imported Idoc and exported as xsd and changed occurance to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
i did mapping between these two external definitions.
and i selected standard idoc for source and target interface for interface mapping and given message mapping of previous step.
In ID
sender agreement :
 sender service :BS_external
 sender interface :MI_OUT_WearUnits
receiver agreement:
 receiver service :R/3
 receiver interface : standard Idoc
Interface determination:
sender service :BS_external
sender interface :MI_OUT_WearUnits
reciever service :R/3
and clicked create
inbound interface : Standard IDOc
i am not getting Interface mapping which i created in IR.
i tried Enhance interface determination also..
please guide me....
waiting for your help.
regards
ram

Error in message mapping of IDoC Invoic02

Hi,
i have imported the invoic02 idoc into PI system. i have mapped the required field os idoc with standard XSD which is imported through ED. I'm able to most of the fields with idoc and XSD. however, some of the node in xsd are repaeting.
so here the part of xsd with which i'm mapping.
(first_node)ListOfTaxSummary                      0..1
(second_parent_node)TaxSummary                   1..unboubed
(child_node) tax                                 1..1
(element)TaxAmount                                0..1
(element)TaxCategoryCoded                         0..1
here the i have mapped ListOfTaxSummary    with the idoc node E1EDS01
TaxSummary with E1EDS01
tax with E1EDS01.
i tried all possibilities with different mapping. but i'm able to get the tax node under taxsummary with the element. the problem its been repeated as E1EDS01 idoc repeats.
please help us in solving this problem.
Thanks
Kind regards,
Lalitkumar.

Could someone tell me is there any relation for the above error in XML messages and to the message mapping?
The error mentions that you have used an IDOC in your mapping program which is not found in the ESR....you need to check if the IDOC is present in the ESR and is present under the correct SWCV.
Once you have done the check do some dummy change to the mapping and activate it (if in DEV) and then check the CACHE.

Error in Message Mapping "Target message IDOC: ORDRSP.ORDERS02 does not exi

Hi,
I have joined newly to the team.
When I tried to open one message mapping it throwinf follwing error...
"Target message IDOC: ORDRSP.ORDERS02 does not exist in software component version ID: 44423362454456485465..
Check whether the software component version ID: 44423362454456485465 is in Enterprise Service Repository. Import this version if necessary"
Is there any impact because of which in the message flow?
In my case some of the messages are failing with mapping error "runtime exception occured during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_SUS2MMOrderResponse_; java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to invoke the method java.util.Map.get(java.lang.Object) of an object loaded from field com.sap.aii.map`"
And some of the messages are processed sucessfully and they also using the same mapping program 'SUS2MMOrderResponse'.
Could someone tell me is there any relation for the above error in XML messages and to the message mapping?
Regards
Baskaran K

Could someone tell me is there any relation for the above error in XML messages and to the message mapping?
The error mentions that you have used an IDOC in your mapping program which is not found in the ESR....you need to check if the IDOC is present in the ESR and is present under the correct SWCV.
Once you have done the check do some dummy change to the mapping and activate it (if in DEV) and then check the CACHE.

Message mapping challenge in IDOC to EDI scenario

Dear PI message mapping experts,
I'm a newbie in PI and facing a mapping problem using graphical message mapping.
I'm in an IDOC (INVOIC.INVOICE02) to FILE (EDI) scenario.
Here after is the mapping i need to perform :
Source structure IDOC :
<E1EDKA1> (0..99)
 <NAME1> A </NAME1> (0..1)
 <NAME2> B </NAME2> (0..1)
 <NAME3> C </NAME3> (0..1)
 <NAME4> D </NAME4> (0..1)
</E1EDKA1>
Target structure :
<AccountingCustomerParty> (1..1)
 <Party> (0..1)
 <PartyName> (0..unbounded)
 <Name>A</Name> (1..1)
 </PartyName>
 <PartyName>
 <Name>B</Name>
 </PartyName>
 <PartyName>
 <Name>C</Name>
 </PartyName>
 <PartyName>
 <Name>D</Name>
 </PartyName>
 </Party>
</AccountingCustomerParty>
I know i have to play with context and queues with stanard function or UDF but cannot succeed to do it.
Could you please help me ?
Thanks in advance,
Alysee

One approach out of available few ways to implement this:
NAME1 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[0]
NAME2 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[1] (Create deuplicate segment)
NAME3 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[2] (Create deuplicate segment)
NAME4 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[3] (Create deuplicate segment)
Srikanth Srinivasan

Message Mapping - IDOC to http

Hi ,
I am creating Message mapping for IDOC to Http scenario.
In which i have the following requirement. For a partner Role in segment E1BPDLVPARTNER we need to get the Address_No value
and then with that we need to get the address from segment E1BPADR1
<E1BPDLVPARTNER>
 <PARTN_ROLE>AG</PARTN_ROLE>
 <PARTNER_NO>0007745359</PARTNER_NO>
</E1BPDLVPARTNER>
<E1BPDLVPARTNER SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_NO>0007745359</PARTNER_NO>
 <ADDRESS_NO>0000267775</ADDRESS_NO>
</E1BPDLVPARTNER>
 <E1BPDLVPARTNER SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_NO>0007759123</PARTNER_NO>
 <ADDRESS_NO>9000001048</ADDRESS_NO>
</E1BPDLVPARTNER>
<E1BPADR1 SEGMENT="1">
 <ADDR_NO>000075</ADDR_NO>
 <NAME>BRIDT HOSPITAL INC</NAME>
 </E1BPADR1>
 <E1BPADR1 SEGMENT="1">
 <ADDR_NO>00775</ADDR_NO>
 <NAME>BRIDGA</NAME>
 </E1BPADR1>
 <E1BPADR1 SEGMENT="1">
 <ADDR_NO>05</ADDR_NO>
 <NAME>BRIDL INC</NAME>
 </E1BPADR1>
Can you provide inputs on this.
Thanks,
Vishal

For the Address No 0007745359 in E1BPDLVPARTNER we need to go to the E1BPADR1 segment and get the address from
it and populate the target. Also the data above is test one
Me a bit confused about your requirement!
In your structure Partner_Number is having the value 0007745359
What i get is you have to check for PartnerNo in E1BPDLVPARTNER and if that value matches then go to E1BPADR1 segment and get the Address......but to go to a particular E1BPADR1 you need to check for some field within it.....
Your mapping logic will be something like:
PartNum/ AddrNum -->
 --->equalS --->
Constant(0007745359)
 ----> And ----> IfWithoutElse ---> Target
Field_of_E1BPADR1 (validation logic) --> Then(Field_of_E1BPADR1)
Context of PartNum/ AddrNum to be raised and also that of Field_of_E1BPADR1 (the one on which validation is imposed.
If possible get some more details from your technical lead on how to select the E1BPADR1 ...
Regards,
Abhishek.

Java heap space error occured during message mapping of FILE to IDOC

hello Friends,
I am trying to do the message mapping for File to Idoc scenario.
Idoc which I am using is HRMD_A.HRMD_A06 and infotype which I want to update is 14. I am trying to map the message type which I hav created for infotype 14 with the IDOC
Its very simple scenerio but every time I try to save the mapping before activating it I get an error:
Java heap space
Internal problem occurred (INTERNAL_PROBLEM)
Java heap space.
I am not able to figure out what possibly is the problem wheather its from my end or the BASIS end.
Kindly help.
Regards,
Lokesh

As the server probably survives (you restart your Integration Builder and can probably connect immediately), the problem will be on your side (client). Did you add one or more large xml-test-instances to the mapping ? If yes, delete them, because they lower the performance and can make problems. If not, then this is a strange problem. Even if the Idoc structure is complex, the mapping object itself cannot be that large.Is this problem only with this one mapping ?
CSY
Edited by: Christian Sy on Mar 9, 2010 6:26 AM

IDoc and Message Mapping

Hi,
I have a question.
In a idoc to file scenario,idoc as a sender,.If the idoc is updated in r/3 system due to some change request after we finish the mesage mapping,what steps need to be followed to ensure the correct mapping.
Do we need to change the mapping.
Regards,
Haritha

Hello,
if just the values of your IDoc changed you don't have to change
your message mapping.
If the structure has changed you have to reload the metadata (idx2)
and the IDoc in your Repository and then update your message mapping with reloading your IDoc.
Regards
Patrick

IDOC Segment not getitng populated during message mapping

Hi,
In my scenario when i am testing, I send IDOC to XI and getting following message
<Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:I805_Abstr_CustOutlet_MT/Records/AMA_E1KNA1M_STATUS.
When I checked th IDOC xsd, it doesn't show the segment which mapped to above status field.
Can anyone of you please let me know what it is and how it can be resolved.
Regards
Edited by: ria sen on Jun 30, 2008 5:15 AM

Hi Amit,
Following is the payload from SXMB_MONI
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <_-AMA_-DEBMAS06E11>
- <IDOC BEGIN="1">
- <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="1">
<TABNAM>EDI_DC40</TABNAM>
<MANDT>110</MANDT>
<DOCNUM>0000000000415387</DOCNUM>
<DOCREL>700</DOCREL>
<STATUS>30</STATUS>
<DIRECT>1</DIRECT>
<OUTMOD>2</OUTMOD>
<IDOCTYP>DEBMAS06</IDOCTYP>
<CIMTYP>/AMA/DEBMAS06E11</CIMTYP>
<MESTYP>/AMA/DEBMAS</MESTYP>
<STDMES>/AMA/D</STDMES>
<SNDPOR>SAPDAR</SNDPOR>
<SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
<SNDPRN>DARCLNT110</SNDPRN>
<RCVPOR>DAX_001</RCVPOR>
<RCVPRT>LS</RCVPRT>
<RCVPRN>CCABASIS</RCVPRN>
<CREDAT>20080630</CREDAT>
<CRETIM>133535</CRETIM>
<SERIAL>20080627162157</SERIAL>
</EDI_DC40>
- <E1KNA1M SEGMENT="1">
<MSGFN>018</MSGFN>
<KUNNR>0001231235</KUNNR>
<BBBNR>0000000</BBBNR>
<BBSNR>00000</BBSNR>
<BUBKZ>0</BUBKZ>
<KTOKD>S</KTOKD>
<KUKLA>S</KUKLA>
<LAND1>AU</LAND1>
<NAME1>Drew Smith again</NAME1>
<ORT01>Ashfield</ORT01>
<PSTLZ>2193</PSTLZ>
<REGIO>NSW</REGIO>
<SORTL>DREW</SORTL>
<SPRAS>E</SPRAS>
<STRAS>29 Hardy Street</STRAS>
<UMJAH>0000</UMJAH>
<JMZAH>000000</JMZAH>
<JMJAH>0000</JMJAH>
<UMSA1>0</UMSA1>
<HZUOR>00</HZUOR>
<SPRAS_ISO>EN</SPRAS_ISO>
- <_-AMA_-E1KNA1M SEGMENT="1">
<_-AMA_-REF_KUNNR>200</_-AMA_-REF_KUNNR>
</_-AMA_-E1KNA1M>
- <_-SCL_-E1ADRMAS SEGMENT="1">
<QUALF>ADRMAS02</QUALF>
<OBJ_TYPE>KNA1</OBJ_TYPE>
<OBJ_ID>0001231235</OBJ_ID>
<CONTEXT>0001</CONTEXT>
<IV_CHECK_ADDRESS>X</IV_CHECK_ADDRESS>
<IV_TIME_DEPENDENT_COMM_DATA>X</IV_TIME_DEPENDENT_COMM_DATA>
- <_-SCL_-E1BPAD1VL SEGMENT="1">
<FROM_DATE>00010101</FROM_DATE>
<TO_DATE>99991231</TO_DATE>
<NAME>Drew Smith again</NAME>
<CITY>Ashfield</CITY>
<POSTL_COD1>2193</POSTL_COD1>
<STREET>29 Hardy Street</STREET>
<COUNTRY>AU</COUNTRY>
<COUNTRYISO>AU</COUNTRYISO>
<LANGU>E</LANGU>
<LANGU_ISO>EN</LANGU_ISO>
<REGION>NSW</REGION>
<SORT1>DREW</SORT1>
<TIME_ZONE>AUSNSW</TIME_ZONE>
- <_-SCL_-E1BPAD1VL1 SEGMENT="1">
<LANGU_CR>E</LANGU_CR>
<LANGUCRISO>EN</LANGUCRISO>
<ADDR_GROUP>BP</ADDR_GROUP>
<COUNTRY>AU</COUNTRY>
<COUNTRYISO>AU</COUNTRYISO>
<REGION>NSW</REGION>
<TIME_ZONE>AUSNSW</TIME_ZONE>
</_-SCL_-E1BPAD1VL1>
</_-SCL_-E1BPAD1VL>
</_-SCL_-E1ADRMAS>
<_-SCL_-DSD_FIELDS SEGMENT="1" />
<_-SCL_-E1KNA1M SEGMENT="1" />
<E1KNA11 SEGMENT="1" />
- <E1KNVVM SEGMENT="1">
<MSGFN>018</MSGFN>
<VKORG>AU01</VKORG>
<VTWEG>Z2</VTWEG>
<SPART>Z0</SPART>
<KALKS>1</KALKS>
<BZIRK>AU4</BZIRK>
<PLTYP>02</PLTYP>
<AWAHR>100</AWAHR>
<ANTLF>9</ANTLF>
<LPRIO>00</LPRIO>
<PERFK>AU</PERFK>
<PERRL>AU</PERRL>
<WAERS>AUD</WAERS>
<KTGRD>01</KTGRD>
<ZTERM>Z060</ZTERM>
<VWERK>1005</VWERK>
<VKBUR>A4TT</VKBUR>
<BOKRE>X</BOKRE>
<UEBTO>0.0</UEBTO>
<UNTTO>0.0</UNTTO>
<PODTG>0</PODTG>
- <_-SCL_-E1KNVVM SEGMENT="1">
<_-SCL_-CU_KZREG>000000</_-SCL_-CU_KZREG>
<_-SCL_-CU_KZPLP>000000</_-SCL_-CU_KZPLP>
<_-SCL_-CU_FBDWE>0000</_-SCL_-CU_FBDWE>
<_-SCL_-CU_VBDG1>0000</_-SCL_-CU_VBDG1>
<_-SCL_-CU_VBDG2>0000</_-SCL_-CU_VBDG2>
<_-SCL_-CU_VBDG3>0000</_-SCL_-CU_VBDG3>
<_-SCL_-CU_FEDWE>0000</_-SCL_-CU_FEDWE>
<_-SCL_-CU_VEDG1>0000</_-SCL_-CU_VEDG1>
<_-SCL_-CU_VEDG2>0000</_-SCL_-CU_VEDG2>
<_-SCL_-CU_VEDG3>0000</_-SCL_-CU_VEDG3>
<_-SCL_-CU_MTPST>0000000000</_-SCL_-CU_MTPST>
<_-SCL_-CU_MXHUB>0000000000</_-SCL_-CU_MXHUB>
<_-SCL_-CU_SORTR>0</_-SCL_-CU_SORTR>
<_-SCL_-PO_ZFHMG>0.000</_-SCL_-PO_ZFHMG>
<_-SCL_-PO_MXSTH>0</_-SCL_-PO_MXSTH>
<_-SCL_-PO_TWPLUS>000000</_-SCL_-PO_TWPLUS>
<_-SCL_-GC_LONGITUD>0.000000000000</_-SCL_-GC_LONGITUD>
<_-SCL_-GC_LATITUDE>0.000000000000</_-SCL_-GC_LATITUDE>
<_-SCL_-GC_REFID>0000000000</_-SCL_-GC_REFID>
</_-SCL_-E1KNVVM>
- <E1KNVPM SEGMENT="1">
<MSGFN>009</MSGFN>
<PARVW>YM</PARVW>
<KUNN2>0001231235</KUNN2>
<KNREF>00000038</KNREF>
<PARZA>0</PARZA>
</E1KNVPM>
- <E1KNVPM SEGMENT="1">
<MSGFN>009</MSGFN>
<PARVW>RE</PARVW>
<KUNN2>0001231235</KUNN2>
<PARZA>0</PARZA>
</E1KNVPM>
- <E1KNVPM SEGMENT="1">
<MSGFN>009</MSGFN>
<PARVW>RG</PARVW>
<KUNN2>0001231235</KUNN2>
<PARZA>0</PARZA>
</E1KNVPM>
- <E1KNVPM SEGMENT="1">
<MSGFN>009</MSGFN>
<PARVW>WE</PARVW>
<KUNN2>0001231235</KUNN2>
<PARZA>0</PARZA>
</E1KNVPM>
</E1KNVVM>
</E1KNA1M>
</IDOC>
</_-AMA_-DEBMAS06E11>

IDoc to IDOC, Message Mapping settings

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for