Idoc to RNIF scenario

Hi ,
I am trying to implement an idoc to RNIF scenario. Please help me to know how to configure it. I have loaded the Rosetanet package in Integration repository . How should I proceed further
Thanks in advance,
Hemanthika

Hi
The RNIF 2.0 protocol provides measures to enforce the following security aspects, authentication, authorization, confidentiality and message integrity
do chk this links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/01/15fc3f0ac2c642e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e08a2bc6-e76e-2910-69ae-d7c30c8d8505
Regards
Abhishek

Similar Messages

  • IDOC - JDBC - RNIF SCENARIO

    Hi Experts,
    Currently i am working on invoice idoc to JDBC(synchronous) to rnif. could you please help me the steps. depending on the bill to or soldto or plant i have to get the 14 fields from sql server and send it to the RNIF adapter. could you please send me the steps for this scenario. using BPM.
    Advanced Thanks
    Regards
    Sundher

    Hi,
    In BPM: without mapping lookup , but with Sync JDBC call
    1) Receive Step to receive the Idoc message
    2) Call the JDBC synchronously
    3). Map the Response to RNIF Receiver Message
    4) Send the Message to RNIF
    You can make the Sync. Mapping i,e Mapping between Idoc message to JDBC call and JDBC Response to RNIF outside the BPM..
    Check out this blog-/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    btw, what is the volume of data? based on that, you can decide to choose, mapping lookup or Sync JDBC call with BPM
    Rgds,
    Moorthy

  • Problem with RNIF Scenario

    Hi ,
    In a B2B scenario we have RNIF as receiver ans R/3 as sender.
    Is it possible to configure this scenario without BPM ? If yes ...
    We have configured an IDOC to RNIF scenario with out using BPM. When the idoc is sent from the sender system to XI , XI is not able to determine the receiver system. WE have configured the party for this and it is not able to determine the receiver .
    Please provide suggestions
    Thanks in advance,
    Hemanthika.

    Hi,
    >>Is it possible to configure this scenario without BPM ? If yes ...
    Yes, Check this document : http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/204e2606-b925-2c10-a2aa-8a43c62523e0&overridelayout=true
    >>We have configured an IDOC to RNIF scenario with out using BPM. When the idoc is sent from the sender system to XI , XI is not able to determine the receiver system.
    What error are you getting? Are you using party in sender IDoc side too.. I recommend reading the above article.
    Regards
    Suraj

  • How to suppress the Acknowledgement  Error in IDOC to File scenario?

    Hi -
    I got the status in SXMB_MONI as 'Processed Successfully' for the IDOC to File scenario but the Acknoledgement status throws an error saying 'Acknowledgement not possible'.
    I read one of the documents in the forums on how to suppress the acknowledgement using a table on R/3 side using IDXNOALE,
    i tried that option but i still get the 'Acknowledgement not possible' error.
    Is there any other way to suppress this error?
    Thanks,
    Tirumal

    Hi Tirumal,
    Receiver adapters that run on the Adapter Engine support system acknowledgments if they are requested by the sender. Acknowledgements are triggered when a message is successfully processed by the adapter or if an error occurs while it is being processed. Receiver adapters do not support application acknowledgments. The RNIF and CIDX adapters are exceptions to this rule, since they also support scenario-dependent application acknowledgments. Sender adapters of the Adapter Engine do not request any acknowledgments.
    This means, JDBC adapter does only send system acks, however IDoc adapter is requesting application acks. Therefore as mentioned by the previous poster, you have to disable acks for this scenario using report IDX_NOALE.
    Also go through these documents for any further help:
    http://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-how-to-guides/how to handle acknowledgments for idoc.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
    Regards,
    abhy

  • XML Payload with attachment idoc to rnif

    Hi Experts,
    I am doing the scenario Idoc to RNIF. i have to pick up some1234 .pdf , fieldticket.pdf files and attached to the xml payload of out put and send it to the customers. How can we do this. please any one help me. If you have any documents please send me.

    Anyone working/worked with RNIF adapter would like to share their experience.

  • Idoc-xi-file scenario.  how to display file in html format

    I am not sure whether this is a valid question.........but want to confirm as it was asked by somebody
    In idoc-xi-file scenario.......  how to display file in html format ??
    Thanks in advance
    Kumar

    Hi Vijayakumar,
    Thanks for your reply !! You mean to say I got to use XSLT mapping and also .htm and .html extension together to produce the html file ?? or it is sufficient to use any one of them to produce the html file ??
    Regards
    Kumar

  • In idoc to file scenario, if XI system is down where do idocs pile up?

    In idoc to file scenario, if XI system is down where do idocs pile up (get stuck)
    what tcode can I use to reprocess it?

    Sender System ,Check  BD87 .. you will see alll the IDOCs in Yellow state ..
    You can reprocess all the IDOCs in go from there .. if only they are in yellow state ...
    regards
    PS

  • FIle Content Conversion Problem in IDOC-XI-File Scenario

    Dear All,
    I am doing IDOC-XI-FILE scenario.
    I am facing one problem related to File Content Coversion.My requirement was to generate a dynamic file like <b>%store_code%_%current_date%_sitemaster.xml</b> , I have completed the dynamic generation successfully .
    Now there is slight change in the requirement ,<b>we have to suppress the current_date node of the xml content</b> . i have tried to suppress the current_date using these <b>DATE.fieldFixedLengths 0 , Date.fixedLengthTooShortHandling Cut</b> , But I am unable to suppress it Can some body provide me the details on this .
    The output xml version generated by Reciever file adapter is as below :
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER xmlns:ns0="http://sample-xitest.com/sitemaster">
    - <SITE_DATA>
    <STORE_CODE>N002</STORE_CODE>
    <TITLE_MEDI>Company</TITLE_MEDI>
    <STORE_NAME>Mount Road</STORE_NAME>
    <STREET>Chennai</STREET>
    <COUNTRY>IN</COUNTRY>
    <SALES_TAX_NO>12345678910</SALES_TAX_NO>
    </SITE_DATA>
    </ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER>
    Plz provide me the code I have to write in the file content conversion .
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Prabhat

    If u see my earlier reply, I mentioned that u can not suppress the field from the one node.i.e Form SITE_DATA data type u can not suppress the field called CURRENT_DATE.
    My suggestion is that , modify the Data type in such a way that you will be having two nodes as I have mentioned earlier.  Then use the Suppress Logic for the Current Date.
    So it will look like this-
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER xmlns:ns0="http://sample-xitest.com/sitemaster">
    - <SITE_DATA>
    <STORE_CODE>N002</STORE_CODE>
    <TITLE_MEDI>Company</TITLE_MEDI>
    <STORE_NAME>Mount Road</STORE_NAME>
    <STREET>Chennai</STREET>
    <COUNTRY>IN</COUNTRY>
    <SALES_TAX_NO>12345678910</SALES_TAX_NO>
    </SITE_DATA>
    <CURR_DATE>
       <CURRENT_DATE>20051105</CURRENT_DATE>
    </CURR_DATE>
    </ns0:MT_SITE_MASTER>
    So ur SITE_DATA is not having a field called CURRENT_DATE. This field is in separate node (segment ) called CURR_DATE. Now u can use the Suppress Logic for the same like this.
    CURR_DATE.fieldFixedLengths - 0
    CURR_DATE.fixedLengthTooShortHanling - Cut
    And in your Variable Substitution you can use the date from the other segment called CURR_DATE.
    Hope this solves ur problem.
    Regards,
    Moorthy

  • Error/Doubts in Idoc-XI-File scenario

    Dear All,
    I am doing one scenario in which DELIVERY idoc is posted from R/3 to XI and then from XI that idoc is to be sent as flat file to one local folder.
    For this scenario, I have done all ALE settings and I am able to see the idoc in XI in cXML format.Now I want to sent it as flat file.
    Now, for doing this I created 2 BS & 2 TS. 1 BS & TS of type Third Party for receiver & 1 BS & TS are of type Web as ABAP for sender. Then I have created one namespace in IR. I have not created any DT, MT, MI, MM becoz the structure of source and target file are same. Now, I created one IM in which I specified specified Type as "ABAP Class" & Mapping program name as one of the Z function module as specified in one of the SAP Guides.
    Then in ID, I created 2 Parties ie. one for Sender & one for receiver. Sender is having a communication channel of type Idoc & receiver is having communication channel of type File. And thn further Receiver Agreement, Inetrface Determination, Sender Agreement & Receiver Agreement are configured.
    In my system there is one scenario already configured which is using Delivery idoc so I have used party in my scenario for both sender & receiver.
    Now, when I am sending the idoc from R/3, I am able to see cXML in SXMB_MONI but it is taking receiver as the one which is defined for the already existing scenario but not the receiver defined by me.
    Can anybody guide if I have followed the correct steps & where I am doing the error.
    Warm Regards,
    N.Jain

    Hi ,
    Plese refer the following blogs ,
    IDoc to File
    /people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
    You have to do all this settings mentioned in the docuemnt:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/sapR3%28Idocs%29ToXI--Steps+Summarized&
    Also can you check this weblogs on the same:
    /people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi
    /people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
    /people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi
    /people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
    Thanks ,
    Suvarna
    Award pts if  it helps .

  • Pass system ack of JDBC adapter to ERP in IDoc - XI - JDBC scenario

    Dear all,
    i have an IDoc -> XI -> JDBC scenario (without using ccBPM). In the standard way the ERP system, sending the IDoc waits for an application acknowledgement. However the JDBC adapter is only capeable to send system acknowledgements.
    Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
    In help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/ab/bdb13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm) under "IDoc Processing with the IDoc Adapter " there is a table that maps XI system/applic acknowledgement to IDoc status. So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
    Can anyone tell, if this is really working? What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
    In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
    Many thanks and best regards
    Florian

    Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
    Without BPM, No.
    So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
    The ack referred here is related to idoc status whether it is properly reached till XI or not and not related to the JDBC ack.
    What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
    Then u won't have any ALEAUD message at sender R3.
    In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
    No
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario

    Hi,
    Will we configure integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario or the RFC destination related to the port will be suffice?
    For which logical system will the outbound partner profile configured?
    Regards,
    Gajendra.

    Hello,
    I feel that the RFC destination linked to the port is the key here.
    Because the scenario (IDoc to File) works in both the cases:
    Case 1: Used the logical system as Integration server
    Case 2: Used the logical system related to the file (third party) in the SLD.
    In both the above cases the RFC destination points to the integration server.
    Is this the case that in the XI scenarios (where IDoc are sent) the logical system name in the partner profile is just dummy and has not much significance??
    It is the port that matters and once the Idoc reaches XI the routing takes place based on the configuration in ID.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Gajendra.

  • IDOC to JDBC scenario in case of Cost Element Group IDOC.

    This is an IDOC to JDBC scenario.
    The Cost Element Group IDOC is having different segments. The main segment E1COGH (1...unbound) is consisting of different subsegment like E1OGS (0...unbound) & E1COGV (0...unbound). The main segment (E1COGH) along with subsegments E1OGS & E1COGV) is occuring more that 1 times. I have to insert data into the table, which we can do in single rows (no hierarchy  is possible in tables). I have used "use one as many" in message mapping. Now if E1OGS or E1COGV is repeating in a single E1COGH segment then we dont get any error. But if I duplicate the main segment then I am getting runtime exception.
    Please suggest about how to map in this case.

    In my scenario:
         E1COGH
         |
          -> E1COGS
             E1COGV
    where     E1CGH -> Main segment
         E1COGS & E1COGV -> sub segment
    E1COGH -> 1..unbound
    E1COGS -> 1..unbound
    E1COGV -> 1..unbound
    At the target side I have created two Statement Structure (ie.Statement & Statement_1) . One for E1COGS (ie. Statement) & the other for E1COGV (ie. Statement_1).
    Case 1 ->  If E1COGS is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
    Case 2 -> If E1COGS is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
    This will be mapped with Statement & in the absence of E1COGS this Statement structure is SUPPRESSED.
    Similarly,
    Case 1 -> If E1COGV is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
    Case 2 -> If E1COGV is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
    This will be mapped with Statement_1 & in the absence of E1COGV this Statement_1 structure is SUPPRESSED.
    All the elements of the segment E1COGH, E1COGHT & E1COGHR are replicated in all the rows for X (no. of occurance of E1COGS) + Y (no. of occurance of E1COGV).
    While testing in Message Mapping, I am able to get the output as for multiple occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV in a single E1COGH.
    But if I increse the occurence of E1COGH the it is giving the following error :
    Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_Cost_Element_Group_Response/Statement/DBtablename/access/GROUPNAME. The message is: Exception:[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.IllegalInstanceException: Too few values in first queue in function useOneAsMany. It must have the same number of contexts as second queue.] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.NodeFunctions method useOneAsMany[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.CollapseContexts@51197231, , ]
    Please suggest how to map the occurence of E1COGH simultaneously with the occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV.

  • RFC Destination not getting connected - IDoc to XI scenario

    Hi Everybody,
    I want send an IDoc from R/3 System to Xi, I have created Two logical systems (Sender and Receiver correspondingly) and i have assigned the clients to them.
    Once i create RFC destination, i have specified all my technical settings as well as Login/Security settings, once i click, "Remote Log On" it takes me directly to Login page of XI. Please guide me how to solve the problem. If i click Test---> Authorization, it prompts out with an error "Name and Password is incorrect (repeat Logon)", but i have given exact username and password.
    I am a fresher to XI.... please give me some documents related to IDoc to XI scenario step by step to [email protected] I would be grateful and appreciate you if u would help me to sort out this problem....
    Please give me step by step solutions.... Thanks in Advance...
    Regards/Guru

    Requirements in R3 system:
    1. Create RFC destination pointing to XI in SM59
    2. Create port for XI using we21
    3. create Outbound Entry in partner Profile for XI in we20.
    Requirements in XI system:
    1. Create Technical System pointing to the R3 system.
    2. create Business System pointing to the R3 system.
    If you want to send IIDOC out of XI,
    1. SM59 - Create RFC destination
    2. IDX1 - Create port
    3. IDX2 - Import Metadata.
    Note:u dont need a IDOC sender adapter or a Sender Agreement to sent a IDOC to XI.
    Check dis link for more info:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cdded790-0201-0010-6db8-beb9bb2b2660
    please refer to michel book on IDCO usage in XI
    Message was edited by:
            Sreeram Reddy

  • IDOC to file scenario

    Hi Experts,
    In IDOC to file scenario i did in this way.
    1)created logical system.
    2)Using SALE tcode I assign logical system to client ,created RFC destination,Port and Partner's profile.
    It is showing all the thing correct.
    3) In XI system , I configured using IDX1 and IDX2.
    Then I created the material and checked the status which is green in we05.
    But in tcode IDX5, the material is not coming.
    Here I am confused that why data is not coming to XI system.
    can anyone help me?
    Thanks
    Rabi

    Hi,
    The Following are the Possible checks
    1) Check in R/3 side SMQ1 & SMQ2
    2) Check in R/3 side SM58
       In R/3 system, Goto SM58 tcode and see if the IDOC have stuck up in Queue.
       If the entry is available then select it and press F6, to push it manually.
        This happens normally if IDOC stuck up in queues.
    3) Check in PI SMQ2 and IDX5
    regards,
    ganesh.

  • PI 7.1 scenario -- File to File , File to IDOC  and IDoc to File Scenario

    Hi All,
    *I have PI 7.0 . I have in that File to File , File to IDOC  and IDoc to File Scenarios*
    File to File -- This scenario is working fine.
    File to IDOC   --  Setting done in PI 7.0 like SM59,  IDXI, IDX2  and in R/3 like SALE (logical system)---  This scenario is working fine.
    IDoc to File  --  Seeting done in R/3 like SALE (Logical system, Distrubtion Model (Port, Partner Profile)) -- This scenario is working fine.
    Now I need to move to PI 7.1  -- for File to File , File to IDOC  and IDoc to File Scenarios.
    Please let me know do I require to make any changes in Design and Configuration and settings in PI 7.1 and R/3 for above scenarios or it will work fine as it is already working for PI 7.0
    If changes are required please let me know what changes to do for each scaenario and pls also send blogs for that.
    Regards

    >
    Rickkk wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Idoc metadeta is updated through idx2?
    >
    > Regards
    If there is no metadata maintained for an idoc type, the metadata for that idoc type gets loaded when an idoc of that type is received by PI for the first time. If you are looking at loading metadata of all idoc types before the first run, its really not required. Just make sure that the port is configured properly. Although, there is no harm in preloading the metadata using IDX2.
    You need to use IDX2 mandatorily when the the metadata changes and the metadata in ECC and PI is different. In that case, you need to delete metadata for the changed IDoc type and then either you can update the metada through IDX2 or let the system take care of.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Trouble with video's

    On my Panasonic HC-V500 video camera, I've got my movies stored as AVCHD instead of iFrame. I want to be able to work with those files (watch them, covert them if necessary to a Mac friendly format, burn them, etc.) VLC is supposedly able to allow me

  • HT201268 I cannot find the REPORT A CONCERN button under iTunes 11.0.1

    I am trying to have my podcast removed from iTunes as we have a new one and do not want this old one appearing. I have followed all the directions above but when I locate my podcast, I cannot find the REPORT A CONCERN button under the podcast title t

  • Workbench - create new project error

    This is what I get if I try to create a new project. I am on Sun Solaris SunOS Release 5.8 Version Generic_108528-14. java.lang.NullPointerException      at oracle.toplink.workbench.persistence.BldrDatabasePlatformPersistenceTools.loadPlatformNamesFr

  • BOOST ERRORS porting cs4 to cs5 , compiling plugin with cs5 sdk

    i have a project that is working fine with adobe indesign CS4 and now when im trying to build it with cs 5 , i got this error boost::move ambigous call to overloaded function in CS5 sdk file file "any_regular.hpp" im using VS2008 and boost version 1.

  • Migration of Htmldb 1.6 to Apex 3.2

    Hi All I am a new user to Apex ,I wanted to migrate our one applicatioin which is running on HTML db 1.6 to Apex 3.2 Please help to know the steps,tutorial which can be used to complete the same Regards Manish