IDSM-2 ver 7.0(4)E4-- processing load percentage=100

Hi all,
i am running cisco idsm-2 version 7.0(E4). health sensor is under critical condition
i can see "Processing Load percentage = 100" under show stasts virtual-sensor
and also receive overruns on the one of the interface.
can anyone explain me how this probem can be resolved
Thanks in advance.

How much traffic are you passing through your IDSM?
We typically see the interface drop packets at bandwidths above 250 Mb/s
- Bob

Similar Messages

Processing Load Percentage = 100

Hello,
Guys I have been working with 3 IPS 2 4260 and a 4270 since yesterday I have noticed that the Inspection LOAD is RED. On the 4260 the inspection load is.
SJDetec1# sh statistics virtual-sensor | inc Load
         Processing Load Percentage = 99
On the 4270!!!!!!!
DCDetect1# sh statistics virtual-sensor | inc Load
         Processing Load Percentage = 100
DCDetect1# sh statistics analysis-engine
Analysis Engine Statistics
   Number of seconds since service started = 174759
   The rate of TCP connections tracked per second = 0
   The rate of packets per second = 4711
   The rate of bytes per second = 8402
   Receiver Statistics
      Total number of packets processed since reset = 823334516
      Total number of IP packets processed since reset = 822979042
   Transmitter Statistics
      Total number of packets transmitted = 823478816
      Total number of packets denied = 0
      Total number of packets reset = 0
   Fragment Reassembly Unit Statistics
      Number of fragments currently in FRU = 0
      Number of datagrams currently in FRU = 0
   TCP Stream Reassembly Unit Statistics
      TCP streams currently in the embryonic state = 0
      TCP streams currently in the established state = 0
      TCP streams currently in the closing state = 0
      TCP streams currently in the system = 0
      TCP Packets currently queued for reassembly = 0
   The Signature Database Statistics.
      Total nodes active = 16115
      TCP nodes keyed on both IP addresses and both ports = 3438
      UDP nodes keyed on both IP addresses and both ports = 29
      IP nodes keyed on both IP addresses = 1715
   Statistics for Signature Events
      Number of SigEvents since reset = 153308490
For example in the 4270 we are passing almost nothing through the sensor... ANd its working in promiscuos mode. Why is the Inspection Load that High? In the 4260 is the same.. It is working in promiscuos mode.. There are alarms for missed packets as well.
I have been seeing several Discutions for the same reason but none has a fix. The Issue with the inspection load is random. DUring the day sometimes it high and sometimes is low.
Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 7.0(2)E4
Signature Update    S499.0
Any advice will be really appreciated.
Diego.

Diego,
What is your traffic profile? Can you provide packet captures during a time of high processing load along with a show tech? What changed in your network when the issue started?
You are seeing quite a few signature events:
Analysis Engine Statistics
   Number of seconds since service started = 174759
   Statistics for Signature Events
      Number of SigEvents since reset = 153308490
From the limited amount of information we have, it appears that you may be experiencing traffic spikes throughout the day that lead to many events firing which cause the IPS to become oversubscribed. There is quite a bit of data that we will need to examine to validate this. Please open a TAC case and we can begin to investigate.
Thank you,
Blayne Dreier
Cisco TAC IDS Team**Please check out our Podcast**
TAC Security Show: http://www.cisco.com/go/tacsecuritypodcast

Oid Processing Load Percentage ASA-SSM-10

Hi Guys ,
Anybody knew the oid for Processing Load Percentage from module ASA-SSM-10 ? Because i want generate graphs in Cacti box .
Thanks
Jorge Ferreira

I don't think you can do that vai SNMP. You can script it via
the CLI tough 'show statistic virtual-sensor | inc Load'
Regards
Farrukh

Process LOADING has no predecessor in Process chain

Hi Experts,
I have copied Process chain with all process and I have included new steps in process chain like change log deletion and delete & create index(the process chain has data mart functionality which mean that, first it load to DSO and then from DSO it load to Cube) so after Start variant I have included Change log deletion Step and then after Activation of DSO I have included delete Index step and then after IP load to Cube I have included Create Index step therefore which is the PC in the form of
1) Start Process
2) Change log deletion
3) Load IP (Target to only PSA)
4) Read PSA and Update to data target (DSO)
5) Activate the DSO
6) Delete Index
7) Load IP (Data mart from DSO to Cube)
8) Create Index
9) Delete request from PSA.
all process are connected but when I activated I was getting error message that Process LOADING has no predecessor
so pls advise me what went wrong or what should I do.
Note
1) load type is full load and I was in BI.7
2) there is no DTP engaged

Hi
during creation of modification of chain you must have deleted few links to Loading step.
Go to settings-> Default chains and see if autosuggest is on, if it is on this might have cause this.
To Resolve this problem go to edit mode of chain and then go to View->Detail view on
now you will be able to see unlinked loading step.
Delete unlinked and un necessary steps from here and reactivate chain.
Hope this works
Regards
Sudeep

Too many logical errors (in terms of business processes); maximum was 100

hi friends !
I'm using the direct input program RMDATIND for uploading the material master data. and i'm facing the error:
"Too many logical errors (in terms of business processes); maximum was 100"
thanks and regards,
sachin soni

Hi,
If you checked in standard program,problem is occuring in the function module
'MATERIAL_MAINTAIN_DARK'.

Some Oracle processes are consuming 100% CPU

Hi,
Some of my oracle processes are consuming most amount of cpu continuously.What are the general steps to sort out this problem.I think the query is a tuned one.

Hi,
What is your veriosn of Oracle? what is the OS? which oracle process is consuming 100% CPU? how did u find out it is conuming?
and you have mentiond query is tuned one... it does your query is taking time to execute?
there is no clarity in your question...
Regards,
Vijayaraghavan K

Web browser processes use over 100% CPU (OS 10.6.8)

Hey, I know this problem has come up a lot in the last couple of years, but I've looked everywhere, at every thread and possible solution to my problem and none have ever worked, so as a last resort I'm going to just straight up ask bout again and hope I'm missing something.
So whenever anything on my browser is moving, wether it be Flash, HTML 5, Java or even an embedded video, on every browser I've tried from Opera to Safari and every time it will put two or three processes related to the browser up to 60%, usually amounting to over 120%. I have tried doing a fresh install of Snow Leopard, which only softened the problem for a small while. This problem, and a couple others started happening after the 10.6.8 update was installed. I have never installed Safar Extensions, I have fixed permissions, cleared caches, binned files, tried running Safari under 32-bit and 32-bit Rosetta.
Nothing works. After 20 seconds of a youtube video my macbook will freeze and ask me to hold down the power button. If I download the video through activity and play it in VLC it's fine. If I play it in Quicktime it's fine for 20 seconds and then the video stutters and slows right down before the audio stops and Quicktime refuses to play anything unless it's closed.
Among other problems caused by the update: Alt 3 is no longer hash, it just turns my cursor into a crosshair temporarily and MDS/MDworker sometimes randomly decide they're going to join in on the rogue processes for a while. I'm so close to having to sell a bunch of stuff in order to get a laptop so I can finish my uni course, it's particularly horrible knowing that I rely on my macbook for all my university work and gigs yet it's been letting me down so much.
Model Name:          MacBook
Model Identifier:          MacBook2,1
Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:          1.83 GHz
Number Of Processors:          1
Total Number Of Cores:          2
L2 Cache:          2 MB
Memory:          2 GB

Oh, I posted this to the Macbook forum as it's ambiguous whether the update caused a hardware/software confliction, since a fresh install of Snow Leopard did not work.

Background processing - load distribution guidelines

Hello,
We are using the HR module (ESS/MSS type Web application) in an ECC6 system.
Due to the business needs we need to run heavy interfaces job.
Basically the interfaces background jobs would turn round the clock and we fear this will impact the end users running the dialog transactions.
While we can scale up the environment I was wondering if there are any guidelines or best practices from SAP regarding SAP background processing and interfaces. Recommendations like running interfaces background jobs outside businnes hours. Or anything similar that could help us approach the topic in a good way.
Currently we fell that we will misuse the system and we will generate a big impact on the end-user dialog performance.
Any hint is greatly appreciated,
Kind Regards,
Florin

you can use logon load balancing in scheduling those background jobs,
Re: Scheduling background job on Logon group
Re: Scheduling background job on Logon group
or you can speficify some particular jobs to be run only on application server so as to avoid the load in CI
and following also might help you
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c4/3a7f39505211d189550000e829fbbd/frameset.htm

No error generated if batch process load file uses wrong naming convention

Another interesting one...
When using the batch processing functionality of FDM, which can be executed by either:
- FDM Workbench (manually)
- Hyperion FDM Task Manager (scheduled)
- upsShell.exe (scheduled and executed from a batch script)
..., one has to name the data file (to be loaded) using a specific file naming convention (i.e. "A~LOCATION~CATEGORY~PERIOD~RA.csv" format, for example). However, if one does not name the file correctly and then tries to process the file using batch processing functionality using any of the above three methods, FDM happily moves the file out of the OpenBatch folder and into a new folder, but the file is not loaded as it does not know where to map it to (as expected). However, there are no errors in Outbox\Logs\<username>.err to inform the user, so one is non the wiser that anything has gone wrong!
When using FDM Workbench, an error is displayed on the screen (POV - "Batch Completed With Errors, ( 1 ) Files Contained Errors"), but this is the only indication of any error. And normally, one would be scheduling the load using upsShell.exe or Hyperion FDM Task Manager anyway...
Has anyone else noticed this, or am I doing something wrong here? :-)

Yes, as per my original post the only feedback on any POV errors appears to be when using the FDM Workbench Batch Processing GUI.
Regarding the "Batch Process Report in FDM" you mentioned, are you referring to Analysis | Timeline accessible via FDM web client? Unfortunately this does not appear to provide much in the way of detail or errors, only general events that occurred. I cannot locate any batch process report, other than the log output I defined when calling upsShell.exe. However, this contains no POV errors...

Initial Load R3AM1 Parallel Processing (load objects)

Dear
After optimizing the parallel processing for the initial load between ISU -> CRM (Initial Load ISU / CRM Issues), I would like to know the following:
On the CRM system , transaction R3AM1 you can monitor the Load Objects.Is it possible to parallel process the load objects?
At this time we can see each block being processed one at the time. We can however see there are multiple queues available.
Any info would be most welcome.
Kind regards
Lucas

There you have it!
increase MAX_PARALLEL_PROCESSES(changing crm table smofparsfa) from 5 to 10 and you will see more queues getting processed simultaneously.
More info:
The maximum number of loads and requests that can be processed simultaneously is defined in the table SMOFPARSFA under the MAX_PARALLEL_PROCESSES..The hierarchy in order of preference is initial load, request load, and then SDIMA.
If the number of running loads and the number of running requests in total is as much as or higher than this number, the remaining loads have to wait until a process is free again.Consequently this parameter can be modified if the processing of loads\requests is delayed due to non availability of free processes.The default value of this parameter is 5(as is there in your CRM as well)
There's no need to change anything in table 'CRMPAROLTP' on the CRM system

10.5.7 Translator and mds processes running at 100%

Hi,
Since 10.5.7 installation I've had a couple processes that decide to operate at high CPU load with no apparent cause. With no applications running I've had Translator and or mds operate at 100% CPU load, making most other operations impossible.
I am aware that mds is linked to Spotlight and placing my system disk into the Spotlight privacy list seems to temporarily solve the mds problem. However, the Translator issue is different. Once it starts drawing high CPU load it will not stop. I've tried to quit the process and it leads to a OS freeze. With or without trying to quit it, it leads to having to do a hard reset as soft resetting or shut down is also frozen.
I first installed 10.5.7 from software update. After seeing issues I tried other's suggestions to use the combo update. This seemed to work momentarily, until the same issues started popping up again. Anyone have similar issues? I don't think I'm the only one ... I hope!

Translator is linked to the Address Book and sync services with MobileMe... I've had it crashing since 10.5.5 Doesn't seem to actually do anything as all my data is synced correctly. Go figure! Here're a couple of lines from this morning's system log.
May 26 06:50:27 synner-mbp com.apple.syncservices.SyncServer[11827]: 2009-05-26 06:50:27.042 Translator[12402:10b] Invoked to sync conduit com.apple.ExchangeConduit for entityNames: com.apple.contacts.Contact,com.apple.contacts.Email Address,com.apple.contacts.Phone Number,com.apple.contacts.Street Address,com.apple.contacts.URL
May 26 06:50:29 synner-mbp ReportCrash[12403]: Formulating crash report for process Translator[12402]
M

Processing files takes 100% of CPU

When downloading an album, it takes a >5 minutes for each track to get through the "Processing files" stage. iTunes uses 100% of my CPU while processing, also.
I've used iTunes to download albums without problems before-- this seems to be a new problem.

Go to folder "downloads" in iTunes music folder which is the temporary downloads folder for Tunes itself.
If there is any item within (as a leftover from a former download), delete it.

Dialog process (loading)

Hello,
We have upgraded the system to BW2004s. Now when loading fom cube to cube. We get 2 dialog processes. Before we got only 1 dialog process.
Does anybody know how to select only 1 dialog proces during loading?
regards,
Jos.

<b>Rules -</b>
You cannot change the number of dialog processes directly. The number of dialog processes is calculated automatically from the total number of work processes minus all the other work processes.
There must always be at least 2 dialog processes. The number of other work process types can only be increased if there are more than two dialog processes.
<b>Transactions</b>
SM50 - To check how many DIA processes are available for you.
RZ04 - Is the transaction to configure the number of DIA processes need to be increased,done by BASIS ...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c4/3a5ef8505211d189550000e829fbbd/content.htm
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

After instaling ver 3.6 I can't load facebook games. And I can't un-install

After installing new ver of firefox 6.1 I think, firefox will not load facebook games. It says that the adobe flash crashed. I looked for an update to no avail. How can I either fix this or revert back to the previous ver?
== URL of affected sites ==
http://www.facebook.com

Hello Alsohim.
You may be having a problem with some Firefox add-on that is hindering your Firefox's normal behavior. Have you tried disabling all add-ons (just to check), to see if Firefox goes back to normal?
Whenever you have a problem with Firefox, whatever it is, you should make sure it's not coming from one of your installed add-ons, be it an extension, a theme or a plugin. To do that easily and cleanly, run Firefox in [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode safe mode] and select ''Disable all add-ons''. If the problem disappears, you know it's from an add-on. Disable them all in normal mode, and enable them one at a time until you find the source of the problem. See [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes this article] for information about troubleshooting extensions and theme. You can troubleshoot plugins the same way.
If you want support for one of your add-ons, you'll need to contact its author.

Unable to process more than 100 fields from a form

I am having trouble with posting data from APEX to the database when a form has a large number of columns. I get a 404 “The webpage cannot be found” error when submitting.
The Apache logs showed the following error when a form containing 109 fields is processed (update or insert):
+*[Fri Jan 29 10:45:39 2010] [error] [client ##.#.##.#] [ecid: 79599930492,1] mod_plsql: /pls/apex_dev/wwv_flow.accept HTTP-404*+
wwv_flow.accept: SIGNATURE (parameter names) MISMATCH+
VARIABLES IN FORM NOT IN PROCEDURE: P_T101,P_T102,P_T103,P_T104,P_T105,P_T106,P_T107,P_T108,P_T109+
NON-DEFAULT VARIABLES IN PROCEDURE NOT IN FORM:+
This seems to suggest that the large number of columns (109) or the string length of the post associated with the larger forms may be the problem.
Since the sting length of a post has a limit of 2MB then this can not be the problem source.
I found from APACHE server documentation that there is "LimitRequestFields" Directive with a Default: LimitRequestFields 100
I found further support for this theory when I tested forms with 99,100,101 fields respectively.
The error (HTTP-404) only occurs when the number of fields on the form exceeded 100.
I then had our DBA change the default setting in the httpd.conf file to 128 fields which I read somewhere was an APEX limit (not sure of this).
This did not fix the problem and the same HTTP-404 and Apache log result occurs.
Any ideas on a solution would be greatly appreciated.

Varad,
Thank you for clarifying. I did convince myself that I had found the solution in the Apache config. idea but all I had found was a red herring. Also, I did search the forum before asking my question but obviously not well enough. Since your reply have found a number of references to the 100 limit.
I think I may have a workaround, possibly involving a wizard insert/update approach. Will need to test.
Cheers,
Meagain

IDSM-2 ver 7.0(4)E4-- processing load percentage=100

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for