IDX1 - Port for Subsystem?!

Hi guys,
well i gonna receive an IDoc from EDI-Server in native IDoc-Format. This i want to just route through without mapping (IDoc-Tunnel).
a. In IDX2 i imported the meta-data for the IDocs which will be received.
b. I made a RFC-Connection Type T pointing to a registerd Server-Program (Connection Test etc. works fine)
b. in IB Design i imported the IDocs
c. in IB Directory i configured a Sender-Channel
When we try to send an IDoc to XI, in my understanding the IDoc-Adapter listens on the RFC and will work with the IDoc. But i guess we forgot sth. because we receiver this error:
<i>Code 3 (RFC_SYS_EXCEPTION) reported from RFC interface at RfcIndirectCall(IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS) with TID=0A5E0F0B3E94470D2F67173F
rfc_error_info.message="Transaction IDX1: Port EDI_Test, client 100, RFC destination contain errors"</i>
In the Idoc we posted EDI_Test in the Header-Data for SNDPOR. This error seems to point to IDX1 entry but what should i enter there?! Because the Client is mandatory...
Could u give me a hand?! What is wrong in my understanding?!
br

Hi Sarvesh, well i am nearly desperate on this.
We have to use tRFC because of a Unix-Program on the EDIServer which connects to the RFC-Destination. As described, the connection seems to work.
However, because i am not able to test sending an IDoc from the EDI-System on my own i always have to check the EDI-Guy to send data for testing purposes. Well it's not working yet and i am still not getting what might be wrong.
Even when i give the SNDPOR from WE21 in target R/3 its not working and we get always the same Error message. Again i gonna list what i have done:
<<[all motivated by the IDoc-Tunneling blog from Michal]>>
a. Port added in IDX1 , called EDI_Test and Imported IDoc-Metadata from another R/3 System in IDX2
b. I created a RFC-Connection Type T pointing to a registerd Server-Program (Connection Test etc. works fine)
b. in IB Design i imported the IDocs
c. in IB Directory i configured a Sender-Channel
The EDI-Guy i gave the port-name in XI called EDI_Test but i guess he don't have to use this. Instead he should use Port from target R/3?!
Target R/3 configuration:
a. Working RFC-Connection to XI
b. WE21 'ZXI' for connecting to XI-System
c. WE20 Partner-Type LS, called EDI with outbound-parameter DESADV
So do u think port ZXI should be entered by EDI-Guy for sending the IDoc to Target via XI?!
sorry for my disqualification but its first time i deal with this scenario....
br

Similar Messages

IDX1: Port SAPIDS, client 800, RFC destination contain error

hi
i changed the client on xi for idoc to file scenario.
in sm 58 iam getting following error
Transaction IDX1: Port SAPIDS, client 800, RFC destination contain error
regards viju........

VIJENDER SRIRAMOJU,
If you change the client on xi for that scenario, make the corresponding changes
in Idx1.
Also delete the entries from Idx2. (entries in idx2 are read automatically during runtime)
There is a howto on idoc scenario in sdn. Just go through that.
reg,

Assignment IDX1 port to sender idoc adapter ...

Hi gurus,
I have a big problem and I don't have any idea how to solve it. Please, help me.
I have a non-SAP system, regular SAP ERP and SAP XI and I need to transfer IDocs between them.
There is no problem to send IDoc from ERP to XI and forward it to non-SAP system. Unfortunatelly communication in opposite direction doesn't work. XI is not able to receive IDoc sent from non-SAP system because appropriate metadata can not be found in IDX2 cache.
In configuration of communication channel for sending IDocs to non-SAP (receiver idoc adapter) I selected IDX1 port that is directed to the ERP and it's worknig fine. I can send IDoc from XI to non-SAP.
But in configuration of communication channel for receiving IDocs from non-SAP (sender idoc adapter) is not possibility to determine any port. Does exist a way how to force sender idoc adapter to use some specific IDX1 port?
Thank you in advance for every reply!
Regards,
Zbynek

The IDocs are sent from non-SAP system by means of tRFC. Connection type of the RFC destination is type T (TCP/IP) and activation type is Registered Server Program.
If we sent the IDoc directly into SAP ERP (where the IDoc Type is known) everything is fine
Edited by: Zbynek Kabrt on May 19, 2009 8:59 PM

Error: Transaction IDX1: Port SAPRP1, client ,RFC destination contain error

Hi All,
I am faceing the problem while executing the XI ,
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_IDOC_METADATA</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Transaction IDX1: Port SAPRP1, client , RFC destination contain errors</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Error: Transaction IDX1: Port SAPRP1, client , RFC destination contain errors</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
============
It is showing this error and the idoc is not posting to the SAP. When i checked out the IDX2 i am not getting any such structure of our IDOC type, So do i need to create the structure manually, or will it create automaticallywhen the idocs willposted .
Is there any import and export option for this.
Please treat this as urgent , thanks in advance...

Hi Jay,
how did you create port using IDX1 ,I think you must have to follow the naming convention there.Any user given name might not work.
I think in your case , create port as SAPRP1 using IDX1.
can you you give a try with that.port name exactly same as SAPRP1.
you may also refer this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm

Transaction IDX1: Port SAPQA1, client 500, RFC destination contain error

Hi experts
I am configuring XI for MM-SUS scenario, when I try to send Idocs from R/3 to XI I have this message:
Transaction IDX1: Port SAPQA1, client 500, RFC destination contain error
In XI transaction IDX1 I have maintened a port (MM_QA1) and RFC (MM_RFC) that points to R/3
In XI transaction IDX2 there is no entries
Some idea how to solve it?
Thanks
Nilson

Hi,
>>Could you clarify it for me, In XI side Transaction IDX1 I have a PORT and RFC destination to R/3?
Yes you are correct..
You should have done this..
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Define Gateway service
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (IDX1)
a) Select create new button
b) Enter the port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
Thanks
SaNv...

I have a Mac OSX version 10.75 with just one Thunderbolt port. and it has been my Thunderbolt port to connect with Blackmagic wear my intensity. and I no longer can use the port for mini-DVI adapter to connect with me. I do not want to ask any other way f

i have a Mac OSX version 10.75 with just one Thunderbolt port. and it has been my Thunderbolt port to connect with Blackmagic wear my intensity. and I no longer can use the port for mini-DVI adapter to connect with me. I do not want to ask any other way for me to use to use my monitor. I monitor LG FLATRON E2041 brand .. PLEASE Helpp ME

i have a Mac OSX version 10.75 with just one Thunderbolt port. and it has been my Thunderbolt port to connect with Blackmagic wear my intensity. and I no longer can use the port for mini-DVI adapter to connect with me. I do not want to ask any other way for me to use to use my monitor. I monitor LG FLATRON E2041 brand .. PLEASE Helpp ME

Open ports for all in LAN

Hi, a few days ago I bought a wireless router WRT160n. I want to ask how to open some port for all in LAN(3 clients). For example all in LAN have PeerToPeer application for torrents. I want to open port for example 20202 for all. Now I open port from menu Applications & Gaming->Single Port Forwarding, but I must set port for each user IP address.
Can somebody tell me how to open port for all in LAN without to config for each computer?
Thanks in advance.

Hi gv. I read more about UPnP and the WRT160n User Guide. In section Administration>managment int wrote that UPnP is Enabled by default in my router it is corect. I Setup mu PeerToPeer(eMule) TCP/UDP ports to 20202 and check option "Use UPnP to setup ports". I test and close this port on my router configuration for my computer on "Single Port Forwarding", but in eMule the port is still block. Can you explain why it did not work. For UPnP it says that if Enable it allow users with Windows ME and XP automatically to gonfigure Router ports
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards.

Can there be more than one port for the same logical system

Can we have more than one TRFC port for tranferring data from one logical system to another?
The requirement is to transfer same basic idoc type from one logical system to another through two different ports. Is it possible?
For eg. some specific data (country specific) for the same basic idoc type can be sent through a separate port and the other data through a different port inorder to distinguish between the two.

Hi Shital,
I don't think so. Because of that what i told you. There would be a dirty trick (back routing) to solve your issue. But its quite difficult and not standard. You create two http receiver services and two http sender services. You route your message depending on payload to the one or the other http receiver channel. The receiver is in both cases: THE XI! Now you have a second message, which you can route to IDoc adapter. But in this case you have different sender and in the receiver determination you can put the sender, so you will be able to use different communication channnels and so different ports / destinations.
Advantage: Your task would run, no performance problem (http: very good, asynchron)
Handicap: You see every message double in the monitoring, the scenario is not easy to understand and it is a big task 4 other people to change it.
Regards,
Udo

How do I create Labview VISA ports for *individual* GPIB instruments using Prologix USB GPIB controller?

Hello,
I'm trying to use a Prologix USB GPIB controller to control GPIB
instruments, and I would like to have a virtual serial (VISA) port for
*each instrument*, as is the case with a normal GPIB controller with a
standard NI driver. However this is not what the Prologix driver
provides -- it provides a single VISA virtual serial port for the
entire controller. To address the instrument with GPIB address 11,
you first send "++addr 11" to the serial port, and then you're talking
to instrument 11. However, this means I have to change all old
Labview programs.
Is it possible to create a "wrapper" function of some kind that will
define a virtual serial (VISA) port for each *instrument* on the
controller? For example, to talk to GPIB instrument 11, call it
ASRL3::11::INSTR, each time it is written to it would have to write to
the virtual serial port of the controller, say ASRL3::INSTR, first "+
+addr 11" and then the command that is sent to it.
A clearer explanation of the difference (i.e. incompatibility), and of
my objective:
1) A normal GPIB controller with NI driver: I go to the NI
Measurement & Instrumentation Panel, under GPIB, and Scan for
Instruments; all the live instruments show up; subsequently when I
want to use Labview programs that use VISA ports, the VISA drop boxes
allow me to choose a different port for each instrument, e.g.
"GPIB0::11::INSTR", "GPIB0::12::INSTR" would be instruments at
addresses GPIB 11 and GPIB 12.
2) The Prologix GPIB controller that plugs into a USB port: In
Labview you get a *single* VISA virtual serial port, ASRL3::INSTR, for
the entire GPIB0 controller. Therefore to address GPIB instrument 11,
you write "++addr 11" to the virtual serial port ASRL3::INSTR, and
then you are communicating with device 11, so you can write and read
ASRL3::INSTR to talk to that device. Then to talk to device GPIB 12,
you write "++addr 12" to the same VISA port, and then you are talking
to that device. The problem is that this requires recoding all
Labview code, whereas I would like to be able to use the same program
either with a normal or with a Prologix GPIB controller. Therefore, I
would like to create code that scans the controller for all GPIB
attached devices and creates VISA ports for all. Such ports, when
written to, would have to first write "++addr DEVICENUM" to
ASRL3::INSTR (i.e. the port of the GPIB-USB controller) where
DEVICENUM is the GPIB address of the instrument corresponding to that
port, and then would have to do a write or read or whatever function
is being done on that instrument VISA port.
I haven't figured out if it is possible to do this easily. Help and
pointers on where to look for hints would be much appreciated. Many
thanks!
Milos

My first impression is that if you don't want to make any changes at all to existing programs is that the wrapper you need is one around VISA. You would need to intercept all of the calls into the NI VISA driver. If you create your own visa32.dll and in there, change the addressing and then call the real VISA driver, you might (repeat, might) get something to work. If this would even work, you still might find that you have to make significant changes anyway. The serial connection is going to be considerably slower, and interface specific functions such as service request handling, bus triggering of multiple instruments, etc., would be difficult to impossible. This would be a lot of work, imho, to just save a couple of hundred dollars over a real GPIB controller. I've seen this Prologix device before and have even used NI's RS-232->GPIB controller. The Prologix intended use to me seems to me more for a hobbyist or very casual user. Of course, I'm used to having multiple GPIB instruments worth 10s/100s of thousands of dollars and the cost of an fully compliant GPIB controller is just lost in the noise.

How to forward the same ports for multiple IPs?

Hi all, I just bought a Linksys WRT54GS router and I would like to forward the same set of ports for two different computers on my network (192.168.1.101 and 192.168.1.3) however when I try to, I get a "Port Overlap" error. Is there another way I can do this? I am trying to set up Age of Empires II. Thanks for any help!

No. You cannot forward the same port to two different computers (or IP addresses).
Here's the reason why:
You and your friend are both playing the game online. You score 1000 points. Your friend scores 10 points. The signal to increase your score 1000 points arrives on port 3078. Which computer is the router supposed to send this signal to? Both computers?   No way!
Most online games have a way to assign different ports to different computers. For example, you might use ports 3075 thru 3078, while your friend uses ports 3175 thru 3178. If your game is setup this way, it should work.
Also, you will want to forward ports to a fixed LAN IP address. In your WRT54GS, note that any fixed LAN IP address must be outside the DHCP server range, and it cannot end in 0, 1, or 255.   So the 192.168.1.101 address is probably an illegal fixed LAN IP address.
Here are all the Linksys rules for using fixed LAN IP addresses:
With Linksys routers, a fixed (static) LAN IP addresses must be assigned in the device that is using the address. So you need to enter the fixed address in the computer or printer, not in the router.
When using a Linksys router, any fixed LAN IP address must be outside the DHCP server range (typically 192.168.1.100 thru 192.168.1.149), and it cannot end in 0, 1, or 255.
Therefore any fixed LAN IP address would normally need to be in the range of
192.168.1.2 thru 192.168.1.99 or
192.168.1.150 thru 192.168.1.254
assuming you are still using the default DHCP server range.
Also, in the computer, when you set up a static LAN IP address, you would need to set the "Subnet mask" to 255.255.255.0 and the "Default Gateway" to 192.168.1.1 and "DNS server" to 192.168.1.1
It is also important that no two devices on your network be set to the same static LAN IP address.
Typically, when I setup gamers, I put thier fixed addresses all together at 192.168.1.21 , 192.168.1.22, etc.   But you can use any legal fixed addresses that you want.

Hi, I'm using a Mac Pro here. I am trying to connect it with my NAS hard drive. But i could not connect to it because i have an ethernet which connects to the intranet in my company and Air Port for the internet.

Hi, I'm using a Mac Pro here. I am trying to connect it with my NAS hard drive. But i could not connect to it because i have an ethernet which connects to the intranet in my company and Air Port for the internet and it could not detect the the ip address after i input the correct address on "Connect to Server" window. Please help! Urgent! Thanks

I did not say it is not possible.
I said if your company networks are monopolizing both ports, you should talk to them about what options are available.
Maybe you can get the company Intranet over wireless if you change some configuration items such as Subnet Mask.
Maybe you can get on the Internet over Ethernet.
You really need to ask them, and do not let them blow you off because you have a Mac. If they balk, ask them how it would be done on a PC (becasue it will be the same on a Mac).

Error while creating logical port for Reporting

Hi,
In one of the training materials for Duet Enterprise, i saw the steps for creating logical port for the consumer proxy /IWTNG/CO_PXY_RECORDS_REPOSITO.
When i am trying to create the logical port, i am getting an error saying,
" SRT Framework exception: Error in WSDL access: Exception occurred in communication framework:Error in HTTP Framework:500 Native SSL error
https://<server:port>/_vti_bin/OBAFileReceiver.asmx?wsdl "
I would like to know is it really necessary to create this logical port for "Reporting Scenario" and is it not created automaticallly using the Installation Wizard??
And in case it has to be created, how to resolve this SRT framework exception?
~ Ramanath.

Hi,
the consumer proxy /IWTNG/CO_PXY_RECORDS_REPOSITO was used in Duet Enterprise SP01. Now with SP02 the consume proxy /IWTNG/CO_OBAFILE_RECEIVER_SOA is created.
However, the SSL error that you are getting looks a little strange (it does not mean that there is an error, but it is worth checking):
So can you go to SOAMANAGER -> Service Administration -> Single Service Configuration. In here select "Consumer Proxy" from the "Search by", Search Pattern "/IWTNG/CO_OBAFILE_RECEIVER_SOA" and Field: Both.
You should find one entry. Select it and click "Apply Selection".
Now go to the Configurations tab. Here you should see one Logical Port with name "LOGICALPORTFORREPORTING" with Creation Type "Manually Created". In fact this logical port was created by the Wizard.
Click on Display and scroll down again. Now in the "Additional Information" tab there is a string after HTTP Destination, e.g. 0050568E3F5A1ED096F22339C44BAF83.
Copy this value and go to your SAP GUI -> Transaction SM59.
Here click on Find/Search and search for this HTTP Destination. You should find one Type G RFC Destination that has the target host of your SharePoint server and the path prefix /_vti_bin/OBAFileReceiver.asmx.
Now you can test the service. Just click on Connection Test. The result should be a HTTP Response: 200.
If not, then something went wrong with the automatic configuration and we should take another look at it (for example maybe the SSL certificate from SharePoint that was imported by the Wizard is not valid)
Regards,
Holger.
PS. Don't use the "Ping Web Service" test from SOAMANGER -- unfortunately this is not working consistently.

Error while creating logical port for Consumer Proxy in SOAMANGER

Hi,
While creating logical port for my consumer proxy in SOAMANGER, I am getting the error shown below
SRT Framework exception: HTTP: Current user does not have the required authorization to access the HTTP destination
I have searched in the forums but none of the answers helped me.
I have specifed my PI user ID and password and the user has the followwing roles assigned to it.
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_SERVICE_USER
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_ADMIN_TEC
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_CONSUMER
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_ADMIN
Current user in the error message refers to the PI user that i have specified or the user with which i have logged in the backend ABAP system?
Please help me reslove this issue.
Thanks and regards
Sreehari Nambiar

Hi,
Please add the following roles as well.
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_ADMIN_BIZ
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_DEBUGGER
SAP_BC_WEBSERVICE_OBSERVER
Also make sure that you are doing the role comparison after adding all SAP* roles in your profile.
Let me know if this works?
Thanks,
Sridhar

How to Open Ports for HP Printers for all computers within the network (router)

Hi,
I have the EA6700 router and a few HP printers and Multi purpose printers/scanner/fax ...
When installing the print drivers, they are ok. Sending to printers are not a problem. However, the problem comes with scanning.
The HP Software ask to open a port for it... How do I do that? I checked, it seems other computers are affected by it too after changing to this new router.
I read that it can be done on the "App and gaming" section at the Security page. Do I go to the port forwarding section? But it only forward to one computer. that doesn't work...
I'd like to open a port and a lot of other IPs can print and scan from it.
Thanks

Ports are not needed to be opened on the LAN side of the router for Printers and Scanners. I recommed that tiy contact hp for help and information regarding setup and configuration of those devices. Also the addition of a external Gb network switch for these devices is recommended as well. Would help eliminate any un-necessary router configuration or processing.

Forwarding port for Counter-strike: Source is not working

With my linksys router (Model WRT54G)I tried forwarding my port for a Counter-Strike: Source server. My friends tried it after I tried forwarding the ports and it did not work. It looks like this: |Application|Start|End--|Protocol|Ip-Adress------|Enabled| |CS1--------|1200-|1200-|Both----|192.168.1.[105]|Check--| |CS2--------|2700-|27015|Both----|192.168.1.[105]|Check--| |CS3--------|27020|27039|Both----|192.168.1.[105]|Check--| I can get on the server but my friends can not. And yes, I did uncheck "Block Anonymous Internet request". Message Edited by Iridium on 08-16-2007 07:37 PM Message Edited by Iridium on 08-16-2007 07:38 PM
Message Edited by Iridium on 08-16-2007 07:38 PM

Is the IP address 192.168.1.105 really the IP address of the server in your LAN?
Moreover, check what kind of modem you have. Follow the instructions here. If the IP address on the status page is a private IP address and the IP address on whatismyipaddress.com is different then your modem does routing too and you have to configure port forwarding there as well.

IDX1 - Port for Subsystem?!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for