IE problem- in same versionsite  looks different

Hi,
I am very baffled by this IE behavior. I look at the page
(all gallery pages do this BTW), on my PC-Explorer version
7.0.5730.13 and everything is where it should be. My client (!)
looks at the same page on her computer IE version 7.0.5730.11, and
the signature/image is straddling the bottom container line,
pushing the footer down. I have run the test on browsershots.org/
and it works fine on IE 5.5, IE6. Why would one version of IE7 give
different result than another?
Here is
the link to the site
Here
is the link to the style sheet
I even added a space under the image/signature to see if that
would help (which looks terrible) but it has no effect on that
image at all.
Thanks so much on your help on this. I really appreciate the
wonderful help I get on these boards!
Cheers,
Janell

Janell1 posted in macromedia.dreamweaver:
> Hi,
> I am very baffled by this IE behavior. I look at the
page (all
> gallery pages
> do this BTW), on my PC-Explorer version 7.0.5730.13 and
everything
> is where it should be. My client (!) looks at the same
page on
> her computer IE version 7.0.5730.11, and the
signature/image is
> straddling the bottom container line, pushing the footer
down. I
> have run the test on browsershots.org/ and it works fine
on IE
> 5.5, IE6. Why would one version of IE7 give different
result than
> another?
>
http://www.acmedigitaldesign.com/marmit/steel.html
You've got some invalid CSS that may be causing it. Enter
your URL here
to see the errors:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator
Mark A. Boyd
Keep-On-Learnin' :)

Similar Messages

  • Split line/tone Pantone swatches of same color look different

    QUESTION: In Illustrator I need to split a Pantone color into two different swatches (line and tone). When I duplicate the swatch and rename it with an "L" in front, the color looks different (with overprint preview)! Same CMYK values – I checked. I know it has something to do with how the swatch is named, because if I rename both swatches I don't have this problem. What's going on and how can I fix this?

    John Danek wrote:
    Not sure, but I would not recommend renaming Pantone Spot color swatches.  What's the point?  I mean, why would you mess with the names?
    I think they wants to use one swatch for certain parts of elements like the stroke and and perhaps the other for fills but of different and not necessarily common paths.
    Changing the name make it easier for them to know which is applied to the other. There coud be a reason to keep them separate and to have the names be different to make the work flow effiecient.
    I think the reason is that since they are now two different swatches it treats it as two different inks one from the book and the other from a CMYK mix.
    It simply does not recognize the second swatch as a book color which would have to be a second plate with the same ink.
    You cannot rename a book color.
    So unless you were planning to hit the piece with two plates with the same spot color what you want to do is not possible.
    I can see where you want this but I see no way of fixing it except a feature request.
    Perhaps placing the same swatch in two different color groups?

  • Overprint Preview and Workspace are set to the same, but look different

    I'm working for something to be viewed on a screen, so I work in the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 (Edit > Color Setting > Working Spaces - RGB: sRGB IEC61966-2.1 ). I have set the Overprint Preview to the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 as well (View > Proof Setup > Device to simulate : sRGB IEC61966-2.1). But when I tick Overprint Preview the colors look completly different. Why?
    Thanks, Andi

    Maybe you are right and it doesn't make much sense to use the Overprint Preview in this case. I think what happens is, when you tick Overprint Preview, ID converts from your actual RGB-Color Space to a set CMYK-Color Space and back to the old RGB-Color Space (if set to the same one). On it's way the colors change through it's conversion from RGB to CMYK and back to RGB. That could explain it.
    Thanks a million, Andi

  • User license problem of same user but different client  for ERP

    Hi ,
    Our customer have many region, some region config is totally different from other region
    so we want to separate it by two client
    But in head office, the user will need to do operation for different region,
    so they need to login to different client,
    same people use the same user name but login to different client
    So how to count the license?
    as our customer bought named user license.
    Thanks

    hi
    licenses are per client

  • Deploy problem - CSS and overall look different on development machine

    Hi.
    My ADF app looks nice on my development machine. However, when I deploy it to weblogic server, CSS or something seems to be missing (for example, I lost nice textfield look)
    Did I forget to turn on some deployment setting?
    BR
    Edited by: user509804 on 22.4.2011 12:54

    chk for all the files...it seems u hv missed out on some css

  • Theme looking different before and after previewing an advanced style

    Hello,
    i have a problem with a theme looking different before and after previewing an advanced style in mapbuilder Ver11_1_1_5_B110527
    My style xml looks like this:
    <?xml version="1.0" ?>
    <AdvancedStyle>
        <CollectionStyle>
          <style name="color_style" shape="polygon"/>
          <style name="line_style"/>
      </CollectionStyle>
    </AdvancedStyle>It is a combination of a color style and a line style styles:
    <?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
    <svg width="1in" height="1in">
        <desc/>
        <g class="color" style="fill:#B6D1CA">
            <rect width="50" height="50"/>
      </g>
    </svg>
    <?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
    <svg width="1in" height="1in">
      <desc/>
      <g class="line" style="fill:#969696;stroke-width:2;stroke-linecap:BUTT">
        <line class="base"/>
      </g>
    </svg>The styles and theme are created using insert statements, and not the mapbuilder.
    When i take a look at the theme preview in mapbuilder, it will look like this: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22117905/before_preview.PNG
    Now i open up the advanced style and hit the preview button.
    If i take another look at the theme preview, it will now look like this (and this is the desired output btw.): http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22117905/after_preview.PNG
    Now my question is, why does the same theme look different, after previewing the advanced style?
    I tried clearing the cached geometries and metadata cache of mapviewer, but that didn't help.
    Apart from previewing every style, what can i do to make sure that the themes are styled correctly?
    Thanks for help in advance,
    Dirk

    Hello Joao,
    i just found the error. It is in my pl/sql package where i create the styles.
    Mapbuilder showed the staly as in my first post, but that i created looks like this
    <?xml version="1.0" ?>
    <AdvancedStyle>
        <CollectionStyle>
          <style name="color_style" shape="polygon"/>
          <style name="line_style" shape="all"/>
      </CollectionStyle>
    </AdvancedStyle>Notice the "shape=all" attribute in line_style. Apperently Mapbuilder doesn't like it, if i set this in the style. After previewing or saving the style in mapbuilder, the sttribute is removed and the style is correct.
    I now edited my package and rerun it, and now the themes are displayed correctly.
    Regards,
    Dirk

  • LinkedHashMap problem (Same key but different value)

    Dear Friends,
    There is problem in LinkedHashMap for same key but different values.
    I want both values of same key as Output.
    Plz help me from an example code & it's output
    LinkedHashMap<Object, LinkedList<Object>> linkhash = new LinkedHashMap<Object, LinkedList<Object>>();
    LinkedList<Object> ll6 = new LinkedList<Object>();
              LinkedList<Object> ll7 = new LinkedList<Object>();
              LinkedList<Object> ll9 = new LinkedList<Object>();
    objectName="Listitem";
              ll6.add("id\tlisti");
              ll6.add("tag\tlistcell");
              ll6.add("tag\tlistcell");
              linkhash.put(objectName, ll6);
              System.out.println("List is "+linkhash);
              objectName="Listcell";
              ll7.add("id\tlistc");
              ll7.add("label\tCEO");
              linkhash.put(objectName, ll7);
              System.out.println("List is "+linkhash);
              objectName="Listcell";
              ll9.add("id\tlistc1");
              ll9.add("label\tNKC");
              linkhash.put(objectName, ll9);
              System.out.println("List is "+linkhash);
    output is
    List is {Listitem=[id     listi, tag     listcell, tag     listcell]}
    List is {Listitem=[id     listi, tag     listcell, tag     listcell], Listcell=[id     listc, label     CEO]}
    List is {Listitem=[id     listi, tag     listcell, tag     listcell], Listcell=[id     listc1, label     NKC]}
    I want output as
    List is {Listitem=[id  listi, tag  listcell, tag  listcell],Listcell=[id   listc, label CEO], Listcell=[id     listc1, label  NKC]}
    Plz help me
    Thanks Friend
    Edited by: kkcnkc on Apr 1, 2009 6:47 AM

    Double post. Locking.

  • Same file name - Different extension - Viewing problem

    I know this has been written about quite a bit and I have searched through the posts but I cannot find a solution to my problem. I shoot RAW, import then into Lightroom, make changes, import into CS3 & make more changes, save as a .psd file; no problem so far. I use Neat Image on some files that need the noise reduction so in CS3 I save the .psd as a .tif, run it through Neat Image and save it to the same directory where the RAW and .psd files are. Go back to Lightroom and no .tif file. If you "find" the file in Lightroom it shows up but shows as the .psd file. I have tried unstacking and everything else I can think of but I cannot make the .tif file display. I can go back to CS3 and locate the file through it but if in a few months or however long it takes me to forget that the .tif is there, the .tif will be lost in never never land. Bottom line, how do I get Lightroom to show ALL files, no matter name, extension, etc?
    I am using Version 1.3.1 on Windows XP, 2Gigs ram, 3.4 Gig P4 processor

    This issue was argued down to skeletal remains in beta and after. Adobe finally rlented somewhat and allowed the importation of files with same name and the RAW and jpeg extensions, because for one good reason some cameras produce both and some shooters utilize both for differring purposes.
    Jao,
    I will disagree with your reading of what is standard. That MS's stupid explorer or anything else won't show extensions is immaterial. First, anyone wanting to work at any speed and efficiency will be using something like Total Commander instead of Explorer, and it and virtually every other app I own shows extensions and treats files with the same name but differing extensions as unique files unto themselves--as it should be.
    After all it is digital data in the file that is unique. The extension is a tag to tell you and the computor how to deal with that data. The content is not identical, and therefore it ought not be treated as if it were by any application.
    Anyone with an interest in wasting several hours can trace the arduous wailing at the LR team to treat the extension as part of a unique name. As I said bdefore, they did make some concessions. Hopefully, they will go the whole distance soon.

  • Why same custom designed item looks different on different MIDP phones?

    Same MIDP application looks different on different phones, which is obvious. But the sizes of custom items are also looks different, which is some thing trouble some. IE the custom designed button of size say 50 X 20, looks proper on BlackBerry MIDP phone, but same button looks very small [cant even recognize] on Nokia MIDP phone. Why it is so?
    Is there any way to design items as per the phone dimensions? Regards.
    Note: I want to get standard item size, font size etc. so that I can use them directly. In this case on every device the designed items will look proper
    Edited by: nikhil_shravane on Aug 21, 2010 04:27 AM

    The look depends on mainly three things, the screen size, screen resolution and dpi. Although dpi is related to the ration of screen size and screen resolution. If the dpi is higher, the same image or item will look smaller than from a device which has a lower dpi. Like the iPhone and BB Bold both has almost identical screen resolution, however Bold has a higher dpi so the same image or a html page looks smaller on Bold than it is in iPhone.
    Regards,
    SD

  • I just downloaded the new Firefox 4, rebooted, and viewed you videos re the new look and new features. Problem is, my toolbars look no different than before. The new icons you talk about do not appear on my screen. Please advise. Thank you.

    I just downloaded the new Firefox 4, rebooted, and viewed your videos re the new look and new features. Problem is, my toolbars look no different than before. The new icons you talk about do not appear on my screen. Please advise. Thank you.

    The Firefox icon is the default feature for Windows Vista and 7 only, it does not apply to Windows XP users.
    To have the Firefox icon instead of the Menu Bar:
    View > Toolbars and UNCHECK the Menu Bar.
    After that, click on the Firefox icon and you'll have the Menu Bar appear again.
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Menu%20bar%20is%20missing

  • Fonts that are the same look different why?

    These 2 images (the copy text within the image) are the same in every way, yet when saved as .jpg look different. Why does this happen?
    I have tried saving at 100% instead of the 60%, and this helps make them a bit clearer, but still not as crisp as the image beside it.  Please help.  Thanks
    It is always the left side images that are blurrier as well...what is up with that  lol  See my page
    http://www.partsconnexion.com/t/eblast/bbb/bb.html

    It's rather fine text, and when you save it as an image, it's alignment to the "pixel grid" may differ (from the same type/size text in similar images) by a fraction of a pixel.
    Fonts have a built-in parameter called "hinting" which helps ensure that varying proximity to the pixel grid doesn't distort the glyphs of live type while they're displayed on-screen. It's a scientifically grizzly little property that dictates which portions of a glyph are always black, versus the portions that are subject to "anti-aliasing." When you rasterize the text as you have, it loses its hinting and becomes subject to "accident" in terms of pixel grid alignment, anti-aliasing, and subsequent perceptual rendering on-screen.
    Considering the above, rasterizing text is somewhat of a crap-shoot and should be avoided. Your layouts could be composed with live text; and should be. Methods might differ depending on whether the end-product is an "email blast" or something that's always and only ever rendered in a browser.

  • 2 files with exact the same PMS color look different

    I was working on a print project for my company and all files are created in Illustrator CC. Here is the confusing part, in this logo color file I found from the company inside files, the PMS color code actually matches the CMYK color code, and they look exactly the same on screen:
    But on all the files I'm working on, the PMS color looks washed, when using the convert button to convert PMS to CMYK, the code looks different too:
    Is there a file color setting I need to change? Besides illustrator, the PMS color in Photoshop cc and InDesign cc all look wash out.

    The Color Mode of the swatch only impacts how the the color appears on your monitor. The important thing is that the Color Type always be "Spot Color" regardless of the Color Mode when you're dealing with files for print. If it's set to Spot Color, then exporting the file to film will have a single color pass. If it's set to Process Color you'll get 1-4 color passes when exporting depending on your CMYK values.
    For the company's branding guide, you have both color options depending on how the logo will be printed. If you had something that included a photo, then you would want to use the CMYK version of the logo because you're already going to have CMYK values from the photo. Using an additional spot color just for the logo then makes it a 5-color job, thus increasing the cost. If you were printing something that only used black for text and also included the logo, then you would use the PMS version as this makes it a 2-color print job.
    In some circumstances you don't have an option of a CMYK break of a PMS color, such as metallics and fluorescents. Some companies only print their logo in a spot color despite having it as part of a 4-color print just due to how a CMYK version of their logo appears. Not every PMS color has a 100% accurate CMYK break. Most frequently the CMYK version is dull compared to the PMS color simply because the gamut for CMYK is not as diverse as the full range of PMS colors are.

  • If I open Muse from my dock (grey/silver look), it looks different than if I double click on an existing muse site (opens with a black background and different layout)... are they still the same versions?

    Anyone know if these are the same versions or different? and why does this happen?

    The one on your dock is an old version. The darker version of Muse is the newer version. Replace your icon on your dock with the newer one.

  • Duplicate version looks different than original -- same adjustments

    This morning I imported a few photos (D70 RAW), found they looked good with the default processing (no adjustments applied other than the default RAW 1.1 processing), and created duplicate versions to crop to different sizes. The duplicate versions look different -- the dark areas of the photos are lighter and noisier (sorry, still learning proper photo terminology). The duplicate versions have the identical adjustments (none). I tried toggling the cropping on/off, and the duplicate versions still look different.
    This is very odd... has anybody else experienced this?
    iMac 24" 2.16GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   2.0 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB Nikon D70

    I did a little more investigation on this issue, and found that when I make the duplicate version, the image still looks identical. It is when I crop the image that things get messed up -- even if I then remove the crop adjustment.

  • HT5622 I have 2 iPads in the same household with different addresses and I get my wife's emails which I don't want , she doesn't get mine , what is the problem

    I have 2 iPads in same household with different email addresses , I have just set up my wife's one and her emails are coming to both address why is that, as her details are not on my machine and vice versa, help

    You must have added your wide's email account in the Settings app.
    Settings > Mail, Contacts, Calendars > select on your wife's email account > scroll down to Delete and delete her account from your iPad.

Maybe you are looking for