If ESB routing rules supports XSLT2.0 ?

If routing rules supports XSLT2.0 ? Especially xsl:character-map.
Ja have problem with transform document with opaque schema to opaque schema changing characters ( sometimes one char to many chars ). If this possible?
Any other solutions?

Have you tried setting
"<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" to "2.0" and manually edit the xsl to use the 2.0 functions?
Im not sure if this helps, i would give it a try.

Similar Messages

ESB Routing rule priorities/sequence

I am new to Oracle ESB and I have written a flow which contains a set of rules.
In the first rule, I insert a row into table A.
In the second rule, I call a Stored Procedure to perform operations on the data inserted into Table A in rule1.
In the 3rd rule, I log some information into log table.
I have written these rules in a sequence in a Routing Service.
But when I see the ESB control to check how it performed, I see it performing insert into TableA as the 2nd or third rule.
Please tell me what is controlling this sequence.
Thanks,

Hi.
It should work in the order as expected.
Check that your routing rules have the Execution mode marked as Synchronous.
Denis

Is it possible to ensure ESB routing rules are executed sequentially

Hi,
I have an ESB that updates a database table and updates a file
My requirement is to update the file only when the database update has been completed. Is it possible in Oracle ESB.
I have noticed that in general, the rules are executed sequentially (although visually the diagram shows all being executed parallely, I have noticed the rules work sequentially in practice, but I am not sure if this is actually a fact or mere coincidence)
--Amit
Edited by: AmitSoaDev on May 9, 2009 9:45 PM

You can't get it to do sequencially. What you can do though is to put the insert / update into a procedure. This has output, you use this output to then go and update the file.
The issue with this is that you have to pass the payload for the file through the PL/SQL.
cheers
James

Unity max routing rules

Does anyone know the maximum amount of routing rules that can be created for each table. I thought it was around 50

Unity 7.02 / 200 ports / 4000 users - is there a maximum number of routing rules supported with this config? We are currently trying to determine the best way to integrate several Avaya systems using PIMG and may need to use routing rules to do so....What are the overhead /considerations?
Thanks.

Exception in creating XSLT transform for ESB Routing Service

Hi,
I am trying to create a Routing service in an ESB project. When I try to create the XSLT in a routing rule I get this error "Error while reading wsdl file esb:///ESB_projects/...../ship.wsdl ... Failed to read WSDL file at location esb:///ESB_projects/...../ship.wsdl . java.net.Socket Exception.
I am able to create and register other adapter/soap services on the ESB server but not able to create this transform.Could anybody guide me as to how to resolve this?
Regards,
Sri

The file doesn't physically exist on the server. If you explore the subfolders of the %OH%\integration\esb\oraesb folder, you'll see how ESB projects are deployed.

Asynchronous routing rules fails in soa suite 10.1.3.5.1 on wls 10.3.1

Hi,
I have been testing my 10.1.3.4 esb projects in soa suite 10.1.3.5.1 on wls 10.3.1 and these fails when I have an asynchronous routing rule,
i made a simple test project with a jms dequeue adapter and a router with asynchronous routing rule to a file adapter.
Thanks Edwin
oracle.tip.esb.server.common.exceptions.BusinessEventRetriableException: Failed to enqueue deferred event "oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.QueueHandlerException: Publisher not exist for system "{0}"
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.deferEvent(InitialEventDispatcher.java:719)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.processSubscriptions(InitialEventDispatcher.java:636)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.EventDispatcher.dispatchRoutingService(EventDispatcher.java:90)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.dispatch(InitialEventDispatcher.java:172)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.BusinessEvent.raise(BusinessEvent.java:2011)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.BusinessEvent.raise(BusinessEvent.java:1470)
     at oracle.tip.esb.utils.EventUtils.raiseBusinessEvent(EventUtils.java:122)
     at oracle.tip.esb.utils.EventUtils.raiseBusinessEvent(EventUtils.java:68)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.service.impl.inadapter.ESBListenerImpl.processMessage(ESBListenerImpl.java:726)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.service.impl.inadapter.ESBListenerImpl.onMessage(ESBListenerImpl.java:411)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.fw.jca.messageinflow.MessageEndpointImpl.onMessage(MessageEndpointImpl.java:358)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.jms.inbound.JmsConsumer.doSend(JmsConsumer.java:718)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.jms.inbound.JmsConsumer.sendInboundMessage(JmsConsumer.java:586)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.jms.inbound.JmsConsumer.send(JmsConsumer.java:402)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.jms.inbound.JmsConsumer.run(JmsConsumer.java:321)
     at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.runIt(WorkImpl.java:108)
     at weblogic.connector.security.layer.WorkImpl.run(WorkImpl.java:44)
     at weblogic.connector.work.WorkRequest.run(WorkRequest.java:95)
     at weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl$WorkAdapterImpl.run(SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl.java:516)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
Caused by: oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.QueueHandlerException: Publisher not exist for system "{0}"
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.JMSEnqueuer.createConnection(JMSEnqueuer.java:200)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.JMSEnqueuer.<init>(JMSEnqueuer.java:110)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.JMSEnqueuer.<init>(JMSEnqueuer.java:82)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.common.RuntimeESBSystem.getDeferredEnqueuer(RuntimeESBSystem.java:404)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.deferEvent(InitialEventDispatcher.java:708)
     ... 20 more
Caused by: oracle.jms.AQjmsException: JMS-243: Topic OracleASjms/ESBDeferredTopic niet gevonden.
     at oracle.jms.AQjmsError.throwEx(AQjmsError.java:353)
     at oracle.jms.AQjmsSession.createTopic(AQjmsSession.java:2293)
     at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.JMSEnqueuer.createConnection(JMSEnqueuer.java:185)
     ... 24 more
Caused by: oracle.jms.AQjmsException: JMS-190: Wachtrij ORAESB.OracleASjms/ESBDeferredTopic niet gevonden
     at oracle.jms.AQjmsSession.getTopic(AQjmsSession.java:5084)
     at oracle.jms.AQjmsSession.createTopic(AQjmsSession.java:2286)
     ... 25 more
Caused by: oracle.AQ.AQException: JMS-190: Wachtrij ORAESB.OracleASjms/ESBDeferredTopic niet gevonden
     at oracle.AQ.AQUtil.throwAQEx(AQUtil.java:196)
     at oracle.AQ.AQOracleSession.getQueue(AQOracleSession.java:721)
     at oracle.jms.AQjmsSession.getTopic(AQjmsSession.java:5059)
     ... 26 more

Edwin,
I received the same error when soa10g_server1 starts.
I changed in ESB_PARAMETER table on ORAESB schema the following parameters:
PROP_NAME_CONTROL_TCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/ControlTCF
PROP_NAME_MONITOR_TCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/MonitorTCF
PROP_NAME_ERROR_TCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/ErrorTCF
PROP_NAME_ERROR_RETRY_TCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/ErrorRetryTCF
PROP_NAME_DEFERRED_TCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/DeferredTCF
PROP_NAME_ERROR_XATCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/ErrorTCF
PROP_NAME_DEFERRED_XATCF_JNDI     OracleASjms/DeferredTCF
to
PROP_NAME_CONTROL_TCF_JNDI     ESB_CONTROL
PROP_NAME_MONITOR_TCF_JNDI     ESB_MONITOR
PROP_NAME_ERROR_TCF_JNDI     ESB_ERROR
PROP_NAME_ERROR_RETRY_TCF_JNDI     ESB_ERROR_RETRY
PROP_NAME_DEFERRED_TCF_JNDI     ESB_JAVA_DEFERRED
PROP_NAME_ERROR_XATCF_JNDI     ESB_ERROR
PROP_NAME_DEFERRED_XATCF_JNDI     ESB_JAVA_DEFERRED
And It's working right now. I hope to you too.
JP

Incoming email - Routing rules on exchange server 2003

I am configuring SAP system to receive emails as per note 455140. We currently have only one client and have updated necessary profile parameters including setting SMTP port to 25 for incoming mails. We have specified our enterprise exchange server 2003 as the mail server in SCOT transaction and are able to send out emails from SAP without issues, but cannot receive emails in SAP.
Following note 607108, I am able to receive emails in the SAP system using telnet test (by passing mail server), thereby I believe all relevant configuration settings in SAP system have been correctly maintained. Now, if I try to send an email to SAP user from another SAP system or Microsoft Outlook or Internet, these emails are not being received in SAP. No inbound traces are generated in SAP since the mail has not been received by SAP.
As part of the config, our server admins have set up a rule on mail server to forward specific emails to SAP system. Does anyone have any insight into what might be the issue here? Also, if someone can provide links/directions on how to setup routing rules on exchange server 2003 to forward specific requests to SAP system (I believe this is where our issue is).
Thanks!
Fahad

Hello Markus,
By specific, I meant emails addressed to specific users need to be forwarded to SAP. Instead of specifying *ATcompany.com --> WebASHost:25000, we put in a rule userATcompany.com --> WebASHost:25000
Based on your response, I asked SAP support whether there is such restriction when SU01 email address and exchange email address are same, exchange will not forward to SAP. Below is there response
"SAPconnect like most mail platforms route mails via the email address.
SAP recommends the following:-
UserATClient.SID.company.com
I know that a DNS entry will have to be written for this to be routed
to your Exchange server for relay into SAP.
The only other recommendation is to use the local part of the mail
address to route the mails. This will not require an external DNS
entry but every new user will have to be updated in Exchange.
User.client.sidATcompany.com
There are no other way of correctly routing mails other than these
methods. Thank you."
Now SAP says when email addresses are same and if we put in a rule based on local part of the mail, it should still forward.
Since the issue is through exchange, SAP will not provide further support to resolve this and we cannot go with sub-domains currently due to business requirements.
Any suggestions.
Thanks,
Fahad

Error in Invoking all the routing rules if one of them fails

Hi,
I have an ESB which has 4 routing rules to route to 4 different systems. If one of my routing errors out, other routing rules are not getting executed. For ex, if my ESB system has 4 different traget systems and 4 routing rules. If there is an error in invoking system 2 then, system 3 and system 4 routing rules are not getting executed. How to make them(system 3 and system4) executed even when there is error in some other invocation of system(system 2)?
Kindly reply asap as it is urgent.
Thanks,
Lakshmi S

You can't in that way, if you want to make them independent in ESB build 4 different services using the same source otherwise you have to build BPEL app for that.

Does Huawei router NE40 support Class-Based QoS?

As I know Class-based QoS defines traffic classifiers based on certain rules and associates traffic classifiers with certain traffic behaviors, forming certain traffic policies. After
these policies are applied to interfaces, class-based traffic policing, traffic shaping, congestion management, and precedence re-marking are implemented.
Does Huawei router NE40 support Class-Based QoS？

The NE80E/40E supports DiffServ and provides standard forwarding services such as EF and AF for users by using the following traffic management measures:
1 Traffic classification
2 Traffic policing
3 Traffic shaping
4 Congestion avoidance
QoS of the NE80E/40E supports traffic policy with the above measures and mapping between the QoS fields in the IP header and the MPLS header.
And more information about router NE40, please visit:
http://www.huanetwork.com/huawei-router-ne40e-series-price_c89

ESB: Multimple instances support ?

Hi all,
I'm trying to invoke a Siebel webservice from a ESB service using multimple instances (like BPEL do, if possible) of my ESB Services . Here are my steps (quite simple):
1. Read data from a file (File Adapter Service), 3000+ records, 20 tab delimited fields each
2. Transform the data (File Adapter generated Routing Service)
3. Call Siebel web service using Soap Service (Routing rule in File adapter generated routing service) service
Results: On the Siebel Side, i clearly see that only 1 task instance is being used. BUT, using BPEL and doing the same process, i can see more thant 39 tasks being used on the Siebel side....
So, do you guys have little idea on this ? Thank you in advance. Regards,
Edmundo

Ok, here are the file adapter values set:
1. Operation type: Read File
2. Messages are published in batches of 1
3. Pooling frequency set a 5 sec
4. File is "end on line" delimited records, tab delimited fields, first record used as field names
I have 1 routing service for the file adapter wich has a asynch routing rule to a Soap service wich is the Siebel web service call.
Again, what a i want to do is parallel processing (5+ simultenous like Siebel web service calls) like BPEL using the same file adapter, schema and adapter configuration.
Is there any other info you guys need ? Sorry for my bad english... And thank you again for your help. Have a nice day,
Edmundo

Parallel or sequential routing rule and recovery

I'm trying to implement fault handling via fault policies for a composite, to get faults into the error hospital so recovery is possible.
The fault I'm trying to catch is a service call from a mediator component, but for that to work I have to change the routing rule from sequential to parallel.
So far no problem, it's working.
There are a few synchronous services I want to be able to recover as well, but this is not supported:
"parallel routing rules are not supported for Oracle Mediators with synchronous operations".
Is there another way to get instances of synchronous services into the error hospital for recovery?

Hi ,
Check the below blog to set your conditions using condition and expression editor in your receiver determination
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
Let me know if you need any further clarifications on this.
Thanks,
Sekhar D

Echo static routing rule

Hi all,
Can some one please explain to me when i can use the echo static rule in a mediator component.
oracle student guide present the echo service like this : "the echo service, to use an internat echo mechanism that enables the request message to be echoed as a response message, which can be transformed before returned to the caller"
any help are welcome.
thanks

According to the documentation Echo is available for the follwing patterns
The echo option is supported only with the Mediator interfaces having the following types of WSDL files:
Request/Reply
Request/Reply/Fault
Request/Callback
Note:
The echo option is not available for Mediator interfaces having Request/Reply/Fault/Callback WSDL Files.
The echo option is available for synchronous operations like Request/Reply and Request/Reply/Fault.
Note:
The echo option is available for the synchronous operations only when the routing rule is sequential because parallel routing rules are not supported for Mediators with synchronous operations.
For synchronous operations, having a conditional filter set, the echo option does not return any response to the caller, when the filter condition is set to false. Instead, a null response is returned to the caller.
The echo option is available for asynchronous operations only if the Mediator interface has a callback operation. In this case, the echo is run on a separate thread.
Note:
The asynchronous echo option is available only when the routing rule is parallel. To use the echo option, then sequential routing rules are not supported for Mediators with asynchronous operations.
You can use the follionw link for further information
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/integration.1111/e10224/med_createrr.htm

Notification routing rules V4

Hi,
I have been looking at notification routing rules in in SSHR V4 and it appears to be different to 3.4.
It looks as if you cannot define rules at a notification level but lets you define rules on a
'...has been forwarded to...' basis.
I can find no documentation of these new style routing rules and hence am seeking devine guidance.
Can you point me in the direction of any relevant documentation especilly with respect to customizing these notification routing rules?
Thanks for any assistance
Joel.

Hi Joel
Workflow does have Notification Routing rules, but this has not significantly changed in 11i. You might want to follow up with SSHR product forum/support forum.
Cheers
Mark
Hi,
I have been looking at notification routing rules in in SSHR V4 and it appears to be different to 3.4.
It looks as if you cannot define rules at a notification level but lets you define rules on a
'...has been forwarded to...' basis.
I can find no documentation of these new style routing rules and hence am seeking devine guidance.
Can you point me in the direction of any relevant documentation especilly with respect to customizing these notification routing rules?
Thanks for any assistance
Joel.

Extending routing rules

Hello All,
Just wondering how to extend routing rules and route the message to a inbuilt legacy system and The out of the box PIP provide integration between two systems say siebel and EBIZ, customer also wanted to route the message to a legacy system, do i need a develop a Custom EBS or add new routing rule to EBS?
Would appreciate your help..

I have not used the PIPS but within the AIA Foundation Pack (v2.4) there is a concept of creating an EBF (Enterprise Business Flow) in the docs. It is summarized as
"An EBF is needed when an enterprise business Service (EBS) operation needs to be implemented with a set of tasks and involves invoking of multiple services. An EBF can invoke only another EBS. In no situation should an EBF invoke and ABC service directly."
This may be possible, if not then adding a routing rule to the ESB/Mediator Service would seem the logical step.
HTH

Notification routing rules

Hi,
I have been looking at notification routing rules in in SSHR V4 and it appears to be different to 3.4.
It looks as if you cannot define rules at a notification level but lets you define rules on a
'...has been forwarded to...' basis.
I can find no documentation of these new style routing rules and hence am seeking devine guidance.
Can you point me in the direction of any relevant documentation especilly with respect to customizing these notification routing rules?
Thanks for any assistance
Joel.

Hi Joel
Workflow does have Notification Routing rules, but this has not significantly changed in 11i. You might want to follow up with SSHR product forum/support forum.
Cheers
Mark
Hi,
I have been looking at notification routing rules in in SSHR V4 and it appears to be different to 3.4.
It looks as if you cannot define rules at a notification level but lets you define rules on a
'...has been forwarded to...' basis.
I can find no documentation of these new style routing rules and hence am seeking devine guidance.
Can you point me in the direction of any relevant documentation especilly with respect to customizing these notification routing rules?
Thanks for any assistance
Joel.

If ESB routing rules supports XSLT2.0 ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for